Think Progress

NRO: Bush, Cheney deserve Nobel Peace Prize.

Commenting on Vice President Cheney’s latest threat toward Iran, National Review Online’s Tom Gross declares that Cheney and President Bush are “deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize” for their belligerent posturing:

They are super-mean about them now, but maybe, just maybe, one day peaceniks in America and Europe will recognize George W. Bush and Dick Cheney as the men who prevented World War Three. Surely then they would be deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize?

The NRO’s Kathryn Jean Lopez also encourages Lynne Cheney to run for President.

Digg It!



75 Responses to “NRO: Bush, Cheney deserve Nobel Peace Prize.”

  1. raynman says:

    Into what Orwellian wormhole have we all fallen?


  2. Peter C says:

    These people are so pathetically insecure – with their “Peace-prize envy”.


  3. Nevar says:

    There are no real straws to grasp as the neo-cons spin down into the vortex, they are left with imaginary ones.


  4. Zappatero says:

    this is your First Amendment on drugs.


  5. Perry logan says:

    In case you had any doubts the Right are insane.


  6. gummitch says:

    To be fair, we’ll have to give the award to every President since FDR because none of them launched WWIII either. And, anyway, I thought the neo-cons were convinced that WWIII was the Cold War and that we’re currently in the middle of WWIV — the West against Islamowhatchamacallit.


  7. SP Biloxi says:

    That must a serious joke. The Nobel Prize prize committee are laughing their asses off from the thought of Bush and Supreme Leader Cheney as nominees. Is Barney the dog next for a nomination?


  8. A Patriot Acting says:

    NRO: “Bush, Cheney deserve Nobel Peace Prize”….SHOVED STRAIGHT UP THERE ASSES BY AL GORE!


  9. mary says:

    But I thought that the right didn’t think much of the Nobel Peace Prize? Why should they care if that pair (of…you fill in the blank) got it?


  10. Pete Bogs says:

    for a “peace” prize? lunacy!!!


  11. Loonie says:

    They are super-mean about them now, but maybe, just maybe, one day peaceniks in America and Europe will recognize George W. Bush and Dick Cheney as the men who prevented World War Three.

    …until the DXM wears off.


  12. rocks911 says:

    Jesus H. Christ this country is evil


  13. Uncle Ho says:

    Nope. Sorry. Uh-Uh. WAR crimes is NOT a qualification for a PEACE prize.


  14. toasterhead says:

    Jesus H. Christ this country is evil

    Comment by rocks911 — October 22, 2007 @ 2:24 pm

    Not all of it – just 25% or so.


  15. Uncle Ho says:

    Raynman @ #1: The Twilight Zone.


  16. Bob says:

    That’ll be the same year Paris and Britney share the prize for science.


  17. dumbstruck says:

    Is Rush sharing his drugs with other comedians now?


  18. Wayne says:

    Raynman @ #1: The Twilight Zone.

    Comment by Uncle Ho — October 22, 2007 @ 2:27 pm

    I thought it was “Tales from the Dark Side”.


  19. ShamRockNRoll says:

    It’s so funny to watch all the right wingers cry and pout because they can’t win a Nobel Peace Prize, since none of them do anything to support PEACE

    And Lynne Cheney for prez??? LOL LOL LOL LOL How pathetic is their field that they are resorting to suggestions like that!?!


  20. Wayne says:

    And Lynne Cheney for prez??? LOL LOL LOL LOL How pathetic is their field that they are resorting to suggestions like that!?!

    Comment by ShamRockNRoll — October 22, 2007 @ 2:31 pm

    She is the best they have
    /snicker


  21. Max-1 says:

    .

    WAR = Peace Prize?

    .


  22. Nevar says:

    She is the best they have
    /snicker

    Comment by Wayne

    Rudy can be the veep.
    They’ll save a bundle on their wardrobes.


  23. Raphael says:

    Is National Review a satire publication?


  24. Uncle Ho says:

    Wayne; could be that too.


  25. pbg says:

    How dare we we criticize the President when we’re at PEACE!


  26. texaslady says:

    Bush and Cheney are preventing WWIII ? Ok, so what have these two accomplished with their agendas so far? Destroyed a country, put America in trillions of debt, killed 3838 young lives, made America number one enemy with countries that were our allies, can’t even fix our own destroyed states.

    I don’t think we can hold up under much more of this prevention, help whatever Bush and Cheney are doing for us.


  27. missmolly says:

    Would they give a Nobel Peace Prize to the party/parties responsible for averting WWIII if the same parties were the ones responsible for almost starting it?

    Is it terribly important to give Bush and Cheney a Nobel Peace Prize if the award is “meaningless” — as the sour grapes wingnuts have been calling it?

    The National Review only plays to a small group of cult-like followers. They’re hardly mainstream.


  28. Bush is a four letter word says:

    The war, therefore, if we judge it by the standards of previous wars, is merely an imposture. It is like the battles between certain ruminant animals whose horns are set at such an angle that they are incapable of hurting one another. But though it is unreal it is not meaningless. It eats up the surplus of consumable goods, and it helps to preserve the special mental atmosphere that a hierarchical society needs.

    War, it will be seen, is now a purely internal affair. In the past, the ruling groups of all countries, although they might recognize their common interest and therefore limit the destructiveness of war, did fight against one another, and the victor always plundered the vanquished. In our own day they are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact.

    The very word “war,” therefore, has become misleading. It would probably be accurate to say that by becoming continuous war has ceased to exist. The peculiar pressure that it exerted on human beings between the Neolithic Age and the early twentieth century has disappeared and has been replaced by something quite different. The effect would be much the same if the three superstates, instead of fighting one another, should agree to live in perpetual peace, each inviolate within its own boundaries. For in that case each would still be a self-contained universe, freed forever from the sobering influence of external danger.

    A peace that was truly permanent would be the same as a permanent war. This — although the vast majority of Party members understand it only in a shallower sense — is the inner meaning of the Party slogan: War is Peace.


  29. AlphaLiberal says:

    This is what happens when conservatives are high on the crack.


  30. PatrioticLiberalChristian says:

    No one in this administration deserves a PEACE prize unless it stands for:

    P reventing
    E very
    A merican
    C ivil
    E quality


  31. Tweedster says:

    The first time I have ever heard of a war being prevented by starting a war.

    Jeez these people are silly.


  32. Keltoi says:

    Comment by Bush is a four letter word — October 22, 2007 @ 2:46 pm

    What is the source of 29? I am guessing 1984?


  33. boreas says:

    “They are super-mean about them now, but maybe, just maybe, one day peaceniks in America and Europe will recognize George W. Bush and Dick Cheney as the men who {started} World War Three.”


  34. Frosty Cupcake says:

    The term “super mean” cracks me up.


  35. Bob says:

    Where’d they get that killer weed they’re smoking; is it the gov’t- grown cronic I’ve heard rumors of?
    Does NRO stand for Non-Reality Organization?


  36. Tigris Lily says:

    Are they kidding? Bush and Cheney want to start World War III! Bush is all giddy and giggly at the prospect!


  37. Not the senator says:

    Well, the war criminal Henry Kissinger, responsible for the Cambodian military coup and invasion which led directly to the killing fields won a Nobel Peace Prize, so anything is possible.


  38. ralph the wonder llama says:

    Uncle HO, I think you’re right — war crimes are not a qualification for the peace prize.

    In fact, I think they’re actually a DISqualification for it.


  39. texaslady says:

    Would the super-mean peaceniks be the same as the ones mocking a 12 year old boy’s voice, or the one mocking a man with Parkinson?

    Yeah, peaceniks are the really, really mean ones in the world.


  40. Wayne says:

    Rudy can be the veep.
    They’ll save a bundle on their wardrobes.

    Comment by Nevar — October 22, 2007 @ 2:38 pm

    I thought he would do better as First Lady


  41. Nevar says:

    I thought he would do better as First Lady

    Comment by Wayne

    Better, Wayne!
    (I was avoiding that one, ’cause it’s still lunch time here out west…)


  42. rocks911 says:

    15,

    That 25% is doing it in the name of 100% of Americans.


  43. This Machine Kills Fascists says:

    If by “preventing WWIII”, you mean “doing everything in their power to initiate it”, sure, they should be nominated.

    Oh, sorry, wrong word. not “nominated”, I meant “indicted”.


  44. Krazny says:

    I was under the impression, that in order to be eligible for the Nobel Peace Prize, you had to do something in a peaceful way. Starting wars, does no qualify as non-violent.


  45. FunMe says:

    Wow, those 24percenters sure are DILUSIONAL!


  46. FunMe says:

    Remember the “minds” of these FREAKS are so small and they require so little.

    The freaks they hire are a la “you’re doing a hecka of a job Brownie”.

    Hey you in the white coats. Yup, those are the ones. Round up and lock ‘em up where they belong … the Asylum!


  47. Bad Eye says:

    Well, DICK, I guess since Iran is a sovereign nation, like it or not I reckon they can do whatever the hell they want to.

    What is that you’d tell Russia in 1940 if they told us that we couldn’t have a nuclear weapon? Would it consist of two words starting with the letters F and Y?


  48. Wayne says:

    Well, the war criminal Henry Kissinger, responsible for the Cambodian military coup and invasion which led directly to the killing fields won a Nobel Peace Prize, so anything is possible.

    Comment by Not the senator — October 22, 2007 @ 3:02 pm

    Kissinger shared the Nobel with Vietnam’s diplomat, for ending the Vietnam war. Not that I agree with the choice for the prize that year, just to clarify.


  49. Willy says:

    Let’s see…

    1. Starting unnecesary wars.
    2. Torture.
    3. Rendition.
    4. Increasing the hatred in the world.

    Yup, that’s more than worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize.

    ** eyes roll **


  50. Mr Blifil says:

    There must be a mistake. I think Bush and Cheney are still in the running to receive the Nobel Piece-of-Shit Prize.


  51. joe cantwell says:

    president lynne cheney. hmmm, what kind of lsd makes you hallucinate like that?


  52. tombaker says:

    Nobel has a “dickhead” category now?


  53. Fan of Man says:

    funniest thing ive read all day! killing for peace… is that like FU(KING for VIRGINITY?


  54. Zimzone says:

    Bloviators bloviating about absolutely nothing.

    Has anyone ran this by Billy Krisco? He usually has the last word on

    what’s appropriate and forthcoming. Billy used the ‘bloviating’ phrase

    to demean Al Gore’s award, so I’m not sure a Neoturd can accept it.


  55. lefty says:

    There really are psychopaths among us.


  56. Zooey says:

    Why are these morons whining? The NPP has been given for this year. STFU!

    I’m trying to concentrate on getting armed for the War on Christmas.

    Sheesh…


  57. DanCaveman says:

    [...]— the West against Islamowhatchamacallit.

    Comment by gummitch — October 22, 2007 @ 2:18 pm

    Islamowhatchamacallit–Isn’t that a delicious candy bar?


  58. Keith says:

    I’m trying to concentrate on getting armed for the War on Christmas.
    Sheesh…
    Comment by Zooey — October 22, 2007 @ 3:51 pm

    What you gonna do? Shoot a reindeer?


  59. DanCaveman says:

    What you gonna do? Shoot a reindeer?

    Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 4:04 pm

    I don’t know about you, but I have to get my sleigh bombs ready.


  60. Gregor Samsa says:

    What is with the right’wingers and their Nobel Peace prize envy?

    One day it’s given to bloviators by bloviators, it’s an anti-American award, and a joke… the next Bush and Cheney deserve it.

    What a weird, illogical lot.

    Although, were it given to these two, then it would really be a joke.


  61. Zooey says:

    What you gonna do? Shoot a reindeer?
    Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 4:04 pm

    Peppering Santa’s ass with birdshot would be a hoot! :-D


  62. Keith says:

    Peppering Santa’s ass with birdshot would be a hoot! :-D
    Comment by Zooey — October 22, 2007 @ 4:08 pm

    And you wonder why you only got a lump of coal last year!


  63. Keith says:

    war is peace. up is down. black is white. if you don’t agree, you are aiding al qaeda.


  64. crick says:

    Please….please…….lynn cheney run for president. What a gift that would be.


  65. carollt says:

    And I thought the Nobel Prize was a peace prize. NRO should start the Chicken Hawk Prize with its own endowment. I am sure the President and the Vice-President and all the staffers at NRO would be eligible for the prize.


  66. Buckie Boy says:

    Wow, the Reighwingers are sooooo JEALOUS of Al getting the Nobel Peace Prize that they are tripping over each other to claim that some Criminally Insane Fascist Pigs deserve it for KILLING near 4 thousand of our soldiers and 600 thousand Iraqis, that sure makes NEOCON sense to me.

    Lynn “Early Western Lesbian Porno” Gal for President, oh man that one makes my sides hurt from laughing.

    Buck Fush


  67. Keith H. says:

    Yeah, those two deserve something, but it’s not a peace prize.

    Heard of a new bumper sticker.

    Impeach Bush . . . Torture Cheney.


  68. Brain From Planet Arous says:

    Into what Orwellian wormhole have we all fallen?

    Comment by raynman — October 22, 2007 @ 2:08 pm

    Bizarro World!

    You greet people by punching them

    Stop signs mean go

    People buy stocks that are losing money

    War means peace (Bizarros are very Orwellian)

    Bizarro Pretzel is President

    In the Bizarro world, a cube-shaped planet known as “Htrae” (Earth spelled backwards), society is ruled by the Bizarro Code, which states that it is a crime to do anything well or to make anything perfect or beautiful.


  69. ralph the wonder llama says:

    In other developments, NRO also proposes the following candidates for other Nobel Prize categories:

    Lierature: Ann Coulter
    Biology: Phillip E. Johnson for his Theory of Intelligent Design
    Chemistry: Charles Frito for the invention of Cheetos

    stay tuned.


  70. hterrya says:

    I read through the 70 comments with tears in my eyes, I was laughing so hard. With ABSOLUTELY no intent to insult the other posters (I clicked on “Recommend” for a BUNCH of them), I gotta say that the Comment by ralph the wonder llama — October 22, 2007 @ 5:25 pm topped them ALL!

    To the runner ups, congrats for giving my belly laugh for the day.

    Ain’t it WONDERFUL when we are in the “troll-free” zone for 71 posts?


  71. Arne Langsetmo says:

    Hey! I prevented, all on my own, WW2.5, WW4, WW5 and WW7-9. Thank goodness we won’t have to worry about them, eh? Where’s my Nobel?!?!?

    Cheers,


  72. Zooey says:

    And you wonder why you only got a lump of coal last year!
    Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 4:12 pm

    I stopped wondering years ago. ;)


  73. AngryOne says:

    Predictably, the conservative chattering class and its amen corner in the right-wing blogosphere are apoplectic about the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Al Gore. But their rage and angst about the Nobel Committee’s “politicized awards” for “mass exaggerators” and “deceptive rhetoric” isn’t merely a function of the inconvenient truth of the success of Gore’s global warming campaign. No, the rugged individualists of the right are just hopping mad that they never win prizes designed to recognize contributions to, well, the rest of humanity.

    To remedy this perpetual slight, then, here are:
    “Conservative Nobel Prizes We’d Like to See.”


  74. Kgprophet says:

    Dick Cheney for First Lady!


  75. steerpike says:

    Maybe Bush and Cheney will get the Nobel retroactively for sending the US into the gutter, thus removing the world’s last remaining military superpower.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll