Comments on: White House On $2 Trillion Iraq War: ‘Not Worried About the Number’

By: robert

robert — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:16:41 +0000

If she just had a bigger rack I could watch her.

By: ashabot

ashabot — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:00:41 +0000

She swallows everybody.

By: eddieinc97

eddieinc97 — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:38:54 +0000

Why should they worry. The number just makes his small group of friends richer. And the sheep just keep getting fleeced. Stealing from the American people is “hard work”.

By: PollM

PollM — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:46:25 +0000

We’ve been warned multiple times by David Walker at the GAO Government Accountability Office, that our budget numbers don’t make sense. “People need to wake up”.

He goes further and says:

“I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan or Pakistan but our own fiscal irresponsibility,” Walker tells Kroft.

War to cost $2.4 trillion, believable or not?
——> http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=792

By: karenfern

karenfern — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:31:34 +0000

It may not bother Bush but it scares the hell out of me.

For two trillion dollars, we could pay down the debt, we could insure every person born in the country in the next century, we could build schools and hospitals, we could counter the degradation of the environment, we could probably defeat cancer and AIDS and we would have a solid chunk of change left over for infrastructure improvements. We could definitively rebuild New Orleans.

If spending that amount of money on war doesn’t bother Bush, he is probably a candidate for removal from office under the amendment dealing with mental or physical incapacity.

By: Che

Che — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:19:41 +0000

She is evil!

By: LividLib

LividLib — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:06:10 +0000

“What I can tell you is Iâ€™m not worried about the number. What Iâ€™m worried about is making sure that the president gets what he needs in order to provide the safety and security for the country.”

what a bunch of crap!
how can she say that sh!t with a straight face?!?!

By: sugarmoes

sugarmoes — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:00:51 +0000

HEY BUSH!!! I WANNA STEAL SOMETHING TOO! WILL YA COVER ME???? I’LL CHANGE MY NAME TO LIBBY!!! GOOD!!!

By: Com_n_sense

Com_n_sense — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:54:21 +0000

Why should bush worry? It’s not his money. Matter of fact I’m convinced no small protion of it will find it’s way into his pocket.

By: sugarmoes

sugarmoes — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:53:12 +0000

how any human can lie like that… is just beyond me.

By: sugarmoes

sugarmoes — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:49:28 +0000

it’s “speculation” when the decider doesn’t like it and it’s “rock solid” when the decider does.

facts be damned.

By: katy

katy — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:10:36 +0000

show more cleavage, dana!!!

how LOW will she GO?!?

By: Nevar

Nevar — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:05:33 +0000

Dana’s not doing so well, the nervousness, the bags under the eyes, maybe the plunging neckline is an attempt to draw attention away from the fact she’s starting to sweat the load…..

By: YouCantHandleDaTruth

YouCantHandleDaTruth — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:50:26 +0000

In other words “…we hate our kids, we like to make sure they’re born so we can torture them…”

By: Roger_Roger

Roger_Roger — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:33:54 +0000

LOL,

Social Security and Mediaid ad over 2 Trillion in debt to us each and every year. The war on terrorism is cheap compaired to the entitlement programs.

By: xenon

xenon — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:37:28 +0000

â€œâ€¦it wouldnâ€™t serve the public well to put out numbers that we donâ€™t have any confidence inâ€¦â€

…but it WOULD serve the public to put out facts it has no confidence in (or erroneous facts that the government has the utmost confidence in).

Dana, you’re so full of shit.

By: Chocolate Jesus

Chocolate Jesus — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:34:51 +0000

>Good nightâ€¦and seriouslyâ€¦enjoyed the discussion.

spare us your fake politeness jake….another “millionaire” who has nothing better to do that sit on the internet and argue.. hahahahaha….

By: Chocolate Jesus

Chocolate Jesus — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:26:19 +0000

>Funny, if those people are making 83% of the money then why arenâ€™t >they paying only 83% of the taxes?

Bin Laden agrees with you that there should only be a low, flat tax..

By: Keith

Keith — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:01:03 +0000

Comment by Ditch Mitch KY â€” October 25, 2007 @ 12:45 am

Trillion, not billion.

By: Picklee

Picklee — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:52:07 +0000

No Lefty you just want someone who is willing to work harder to pick up the check that you are not willing to earn.

Comment by ThinkProgressPromotesSocialism â€” October 24, 2007 @ 9:51 pm

No, that’s the system we already have. The working class, working for the rich. It’s the rich that are cowards and won’t make a dollar for themselves.

Lefty those countries couldnâ€™t defend their sovereignty for a day. Quite frankly that is a piss poor argument and you know it.

Comment by ThinkProgressPromotesSocialism â€” October 24, 2007 @ 10:10 pm

OoO. You’re a hoo-rah American aren’t you? Who, on this planet, would have any reason to invade Switzerland? Sweden? Norway? The Netherlands?

Funny you should mention sovereignty. Iraq was a sovereign nation. Dictator or not. Maybe you should learn the fundamentals about sovereignty and how the world operates.