And also, i have looked into many anti-Bush and anti-Iraq websites to see their “facts” and “common sense.” And what i found was nothing more then biased point of view writing. People who write against Bush have hated him for a long time. So using your “common sense”, you should realize that what they write is just including facts and stuff that would make him look bad. Micheal Moore is a prime example. He has multiple uses of just partial qoutes, never using the full context. Really any political website should never be taken at full value, because they just write what they want to hear. I admit, i am wrong with a lot of things that i say. But if so, i do not do so intentionally. But i never make up facts to support what i want to hear, i mearly take the facts i see, and base my desicions off that. So i would like to see some real facts, not ones that you or anybody has has tampered with. Until you, or anybody else can provide me with some, then i will continue to believe in what i do. But if i am proven wrong, then i will happily admit it. So, please, as a challenge, somebody prove me wrong. But until somebody can prove me wrong, then what i say remains right, and that means you are wrong FearandSmear. And i will anounce it again, YOU ARE WRONG. all you can say to me is, “you have obtuse lies, and wrong accusations.” Really? Do I? At least i’m smart enough to actually say something worth while. Instead of being a typical liberal and never backing themselves up. Every single thing bad about Bush that you, or anybody else has said, is just the stretched truth. If Democrats can’t even come up with a bad accusation without tampering with data really says something. It says that you just make up lies so you can get what you want.

Are you annoyed at what i said? Well, once again, PROVE ME WRONG! Then maybe we can reach an agreement.

Now first, let’s clear some things up. I would very much would like to hear what you have to say on what i wrote before. Because it doesn’t make much sense saying, “Your wrong, telling ‘jaw-dropping obtuse statements’ that you just made up.” without even backing your self up. So i please ask you to do so, for my sake and yours.

Look, Zoot. I’m sorry to inform you that I have neither the time nor the inclination to drag you by the nose to the facts and common sense.

Your demand of me to do so for your sake and for mine (LOL) is entirely inconsequential and thusly ignored.

So if you want a less “corrupt” (which I may add that the USA is in one of its best times economically) nation, then support your country.

And by the way, you never were able to answer my questions. And what you wrote was extremely hypocritical, figures. And people don’t want to debate me because they have nothing to support there claims.

I guess you’re right… I just can’t properly debate you.

Indeed, I will give you the last word and let that gem of yours above hang there in the air like a stale fart.

I looked over the Wikipedia link, and i assume you did also. I would like to say that RWA isn’t concerned with a specific political party, so to retaliate, here is a link for your own personal interest:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_Wing_Authoritarianism
Read it over carefully. It very much applies to your website, assuming it is yours.

I’ve noticed this, and i hope you have to, that arguing with one of the opposing political party is just a waste of time, because neither one will change their points of view, unless of course they intend to. But never the less, i would like to very much hear what you have to say, if anything at all.

You have responded here in what seems to be good faith, so I am going to answer you in kind. However, time simply does not allow me to address the many jaw-droppingly obtuse statements that you’ve made.

Accordingly, I will simply submit for your perusal a link you should visit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_Wing_Authoritarianism

Do you even realize why this website doesn’t like the new Eagles album. It’s not because of the lack of islamofacism mentioned or the lack of mention of women being stoned. It’s the whole fact that the Eagles are basically dissin’ the US for being in Iraq, just like you, but they didn’t mention why. They, The Eagles, are being the non-patriotic ones who are using “stale cliches.” The Eagles are saying, “The US is in Iraq for no good reson getting killed and killing innocent people. And it’s all Bush’s fault. And it’s all Bush’s fault for Global Warming.” So the person who was saying why they didn’t like the new Eagles album was saying that because they thought it was unfair and unjust why the Eagles were writting songs like they were. I bet that if The Eagles wrote songs about Bush being the best president ever, and Iraq is a good idea, then you would have written a blog saying why you hate the new Eagles album on your extremely Liberal (and by Liberal i mean you distorting and bending facts so it seems like you are smart) website.

So again, read and interpret things with an open mind and maybe you would learn something. Music is a lot more enjoyable when it’s not political. Now, i’m not being “non-patriotic” by hating Liberals (The Eagles), i really like the Eagles and i really like many songs on there new album. But i don’t like the idea’s behind them. Why don’t you actually think on your own for once?

Why, yes it is quite possible to care deeply about soldiers. But you also have to realize that the men and women who are serving are serving the military by choice. So, yes, you have a right to be concerned, but there should be no reason for all US troops to be pulled out of Iraq. Because what will happen when there really is no protection for the already weak Iraqi government? A civil war would most likely occur, causing the country to spiral into what it was taken out of with the loss of US citizens. So if you would want to have less casualties and deaths, then it would be smart to keep troops in Iraq until the government can take care of itself, which it can’t at the moment now.

And I’m being patriotic way more then you realize. First, I’m not being “blindly allegiant” to Democrats. I base my decisions on what I have witnessed and experienced. I have many Liberal friends, but I don’t hate them for it. I would still support our country who ever would be its leader, Republican, Democrat, or even a third party. Now it makes more sense that those who laugh and criticize Bush for doing what he thinks is right are the non-patriotic ones. If you truly supported your country, then you would also support the decisions made by its leader, or any other member of the government. It’s not a sports game, so you shouldn’t support one team and blatantly mock and hate the other. The different parties just represent what they think should be done. But it is all done in good thought for the American people.

And why, what do you know, I have considered that terrorism is just mainly an idea. But it is an idea that needs to be stopped. Do you like the fact that these “ideologist” crashed American planes into American buildings killing thousands of American people? Now tell me, how many major terrorist attacks have happened since 9/11? Also, how many potentially major terrorist attacks have been prevented? If terrorism was truly just an “idea”, then why are there all those terrorist camps found? Terrorism is something that can’t be completely stopped, but it can be suppressed through actions taken by our leaders. So if you really want your loved ones home then support the USA fully and support its leader. As Abe Lincoln bolded stated, “A house divided against its self cannot stand.” So if you want a less “corrupt” (which I may add that the USA is in one of its best times economically) nation, then support your country.

And by the way, you never were able to answer my questions. And what you wrote was extremely hypocritical, figures. And people don’t want to debate me because they have nothing to support there claims. Once again, I never listed clichés, I listed the truth by what I have seen and heard, and I practically never listen to talk radio.

Now, maybe you in turn mean well yourself, but try and be more of a middle man in political issues, instead of just saying stuff to get Bush out of office. It would be the same situation for whoever the President might be. Democrats now who oppose the war are doing so for only one reason, and that is politics. They know that if they oppose the war, more people will like them. Many Democrats voted for the war before, John Kerry and Hilary Clinton to name a few, but now they bitterly oppose it for political influence. Maybe you do like Liberalism more, but that is not the only factor on how you should base your political standings. How about supporting what you think is right.

you are WAY over that one’s head, fear…
could be cause for an inferiority complex…

“the problum with you libruls is you think yer smarter than us.”

u-yup…
…

thanks colonel… i rather like the itunes also…
…

no Liberal can support their claims with fact. But it seems when Bush makes a claim, he has dosumented evidence. Hmmm… I wonder???

So i’m asking if ONE Liberal can actually support themselves? Anyone? C’mon, there has to be at least one. Guess not.

Alright zoot. So, you’re obviously not a real deep thinker but you mean well, right?

You have listed a litany of stale cliches in your couple of posts here tonight that, quite literally, come directly from the mouth of right-wing talk radio. So, when no one here is bored enough to engage you about them for the eleventy-millionth time, realize that it has everything to do with the inanity of the question.

But, for your trouble here’s a few clues for you to chew on if you so choose:

A) Being blindly allegiant to either party in this country is wholeheartedly unpatriotic as dissent is a necessary component of a functional democracy.

B) It is possible to care deeply about the men and women who fight wars that you vigorously oppose.

C) Victory is impossible against an abstract concept like “terrorism”. You cannot defeat an enemy that only exists in ideology. We cannot possibly kill all of the “terrorists” in the world into subjugation because for every one we kill, we create a family of new ones, including a whole new generation of hundreds of thousands of young middle eastern children who are now orphaned due to enormous civilian casualties and collateral hardship I am quite certain that you have never really considered.

http://www.FEARandSMEAR.com

Comment by republicans hate facts — November 5, 2007 @ 5:38 pm”

If your so smart, then tell me why you can’t explain anything? you just have to make fun of somebody else because they are smarter then you. So if you are so smart, you would answer the question. why don’t you?

So i’m asking if ONE Liberal can actually support themselves? Anyone? C’mon, there has to be at least one. Guess not.

What “lies” has Bush ever told to seduce us Americans so he can control us? Exactly, he has told NO lies about the war in Iraq or the situation over there. I don’t think Bush is some Anti-Christ who hates Americans and is only keeping the soldiers over there so they can die. Is that seriously what you Liberals think???

No the whole point of the criticism of the album is that it is a complete anti-war and anti-bush album. not to mention anti-AMERICAN in many ways. So if The Eagles, or any other American criticizes the way the country is run, think about this:

-Would it be better to have a insane dictator leading our country who mindlessly slaughters millions of people?

-If you hate America so much, move to Canada. It’s probably the most annyoing thing ever to see somebody criticizing something that they could do no better in (and yes, i’m referring to you demorcrats)

-So just shut up, and support your country, whoever the leader may be. Because would rather live in a country like Iraq? didn’t think so.

-The most obvious aspect of a Liberal is that EVERY SINGLE ONE of them are huge, and i repeat HUGE hippocrites. they can never do anything for themselves. If Bush does something, they criticize it, but if he didn’t do that same thing, they still criticize it. They never can agree.

is itunes a better mode than a cd at the music store?

what’s YOUR opinion?
…

Comment by BARTLEBEE — November 5, 2007 @ 3:49 pm

Be careful! She may interpret that as “Tell her Bartlebee’s at her cervix.”

After a re-listen, half of the songs on the album actually are about women getting stoned.