http://willyloman.wordpress.com/ 2007/ 11/ 07/ why-did-steny-hoyer-try-so-hard-to-kill-hr-333/ #more-185

…or then again, maybe it won’t.

Comment by willyloman — November 7, 2007 @ 9:40 am

This is along the train of thought that “Plunger” has been bringing to this blog. While he may seem extreme in some respects, I don’t think he’s incorrect about AIPAC pushing the idea of aggression toward Iran. Iran poses no danger to the U.S., but certainly could to Israel. It’s just possible that the U.S. is being “encouraged” to strike at Iran to precipitate a counter-strike against Israel by Iran. Israel would then feel justified in finally using their nukes against Iran.

Comment by Jim — November 6, 2007 @ 6:46 pm

The Constitution does not state that the House undertakes impeachment proceedings “if the polls support that idea.” It states that such impeachment proceedings SHALL be undertaken. It is a Constitutional RESPONSIBILITY and OBLIGATION. It is, in fact, a violation of the Constitution NOT to do so when evidence is clearly apparent that “high crimes and misdemeanors” have occurred.

Comment by wijg — November 6, 2007 @ 5:55 pm

“Worser” still, wijg – she forces Dennis to apologize…

Comment by Leftside Annie — November 6, 2007 @ 6:06 pm

I can see Pelosi apologizing, and I can also see her asking Dennis to apologize. He won’t. Not now, not ever. NOT EVER!!

http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMembership.aspx

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/why-did-steny-hoyer-try-so-hard-to-kill-hr-333/#more-185

…or then again, maybe it won’t.

“Impeachment is not on the agenda,” Rep. Hoyer had told Fox News.”We have some major priorities. We need to focus on those.”

What OTHER priorities does Stenny and Nancy propose supersede their Oath of Office? They act as if their Oath is an inconvenience.

… or are Stenny and Nancy that inconvenience?

.

T.P.

Stenny’s motion to “Table the Bill” would have effectively killed it.

Sending it to the House Judiciary Committee keeps the Bill alive where it can have a full examination, FACTS and all.

And please, the roll call?

Please note,
It was the republicans that moved to save it and move it to the Judiciary. It was the Dem’s that moved to “Table the Bill”.

Those that stood for YEA on Stenny’s motion feel upholding their Oath of Office is less important than any OTHER business.

We should all be asking from our Representatives:

How are you supporting and defending the Constitution of the U.S.A. when you continue to excuse your allowances of the usurpation and willful violation of the Constitution of the U.S.A. and the Constitutional Laws derived therein?

Comment by Keith

Fish n Eggs, must be caviar.

such crap… sour grapes…
Admit it, your republicans SCREWED up from confusion and now this bill is going to Conyers.