The two latest examples of RSC’’s alleged “deep reasoning”:

277 – “Perhaps you should switch your reasoning to “No war for WhateverSlackDisjointedReasonICanFindToHateEverything” ala Cindy Sheehan.” Comment by Rovian Stormtrooper Commander — November 7, 2007 @ 4:37 pm

292 – “Well, I managed to run this thread up to almost 300 posts by expertly chopping the liberals off at the knees in their usually profane and always uneducated attempts at debate.” Comment by Rovian Stormtrooper Commander — November 7, 2007 @ 5:05 pm

RSC has proven that he cannot think for himself, and can only swallow the “talking points” of the radical right-whiners.

Yup, and I pitched a no-hitter in the World Series – I say, if you’re going to have delusions of adequacy why not go whole hog?

It was great fun watching your shape shifting.

He doesn’t have to break ANYTHING at this moment because he is holding the trump card called ‘The Ace of Nuclear Weapons’, the ace he was dealt the moment Albright showed up with nothing more than a smile and an ink pen. He can make all the promises he wants today because if they don’t work out, he has his proven belligerence to fall back on, PROVEN by the fact he couldn’t even honor the original treaty.

In other words, you have no evidence to support your assertion that Kim is violating the current agreement.

Don’t honestly know why I expected you to substantiate your vapid assertions on this particular issue, when you’ve consistently and relentlessly refused to substantiate any of your previous vapid assertions with anything even resembling facts.

RSC, I’m officially bored with you. You’ve become tiresome.

Go get some rest. You’ve got a long way to go before you can sit at the adults’ table here.

Peace out.

Or better yet just blame the Joooos, everyone else does.

As I told one of your troll friends the other day, one shouldn’t pull out the “Joooos” card until one of your opponents actually mentions the Jews. Jumping the gun like this just makes you look even more absurd. ^_^

Now unless you believe that NK managed to create their entire program in a year, it would mean one of two things: either they started the program in the 90’s or they are pretty damn good at it and now it’s time to throw out the foolish notion that Iran is ten years from the bomb.

AGAIN, that not the issue in dispute, dolt. Your desperate attempts to move the goalposts have failed. Give it up.

You said:

Meanwhile Kim is starting up his nuke program while the ink is still wet on the documents promising that he won’s pursue such a program.

THAT is the issue in dispute…the issue I challenged you on. Provide evidence to substantiate your claim that Kim is breaking his latest agreement at this moment. Failing that, shut the fsck up, moron.

Actually, I would say that he is “exposed” for the double-standardizer-rer that he truly is. (That’s my Pres. Bush impersonation!)

For RSC, liberals are “all the same”, while neo-cons are “deeper” (for some unexplainable reason only RSC can justify to himself and nobody else).

One can only assume that “cognitive dissonance” is something that enablers are incapable of identifying.

–Pssst, the North Koreans had nukes before Dubya became president, pass it on.–

Sooooo, if Kim signed an agreement to not pursue nukes under Clinton but then announced he had them when Bush took office….uhhh…I guess that would mean he broke the deal arranged by Albright….who worked for Clinton.

Hmm.

Your assertion was not that Kim broke an agreement in the past. You assertion was that he is breaking the most recent agreement right now.

Evidence. Post some or STFU.

Just as you have to accept that the only “deeper” the neo-cons go is “war for oil, damn the cost in American soldiers lives.”

You know it, I know it, now all you just need to do is accept it for the fact that it is. ;-)

But if the reversed projection of ‘killing enough people’ was not killing anyone at all, you have reduced yourself to never using military force since war will definitely kill people.

Comment by Rovian Stormtrooper Commander — November 7, 2007 @ 3:49 pm

And I didn’t know that the liberal or progressive approach to foreign policy was “big hugs”. You have just shown again your amazing talent to distort the liberal or progressive views which are nuanced and open to a wide range of facts and options that do not fit your black-or-white perspective. You are “reduced”.