Fox attacks decency…with Bill O’Reilly leading the way.
By on Nov 8th, 2007 at 10:10 am
Fox attacks decency…with Bill O’Reilly leading the way.
In a new video called FOX Attacks Decency… with Bill O’Reilly Leading the Way, Brave New Films, with the help of Newshounds, demonstrates how the family values-touting cable news channel gratuitously displays sexually-charged imagery on all of its programming. In the words of Gloria Steinem, “Fox News shows more sexualized violence and humiliation than probably any other network.” Watch it:
Brave New Films has a petition to tell the FCC to offer “a la carte” cable television, so you won’t be forced to pay for FOX’s smut.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Just getting biillo and haniteehee off Faux NoNooz would be a major step in the right direction!
November 8th, 2007 at 10:11 amIt is scientific fact that right wing tv shows are more harmful than left wing shows.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:14 amThere is nothing Billo seems to like more than denouncing our degraded culture while rolling a three-minute film loop of scantily-clad women.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:15 ammurdoch has always used “porno power” move his product. perv sex is the cornerstone of the republican neo-con movement. just ask “loofah boy” o’reilly or any nearby troll. tcdon?
November 8th, 2007 at 10:17 amFAUX SNOOZ is the Playboy of TV, everybody watches it for the articles (hehehehe).
November 8th, 2007 at 10:17 amTP — please correct the spelling of Gloria Steinem. Or, if “Gloria Steinham” is a different person from the noted feminist, please explain to us who she is. Thanks!
November 8th, 2007 at 10:19 amThere is nothing Billo seems to like more than denouncing our degraded culture while rolling a three-minute film loop of scantily-clad women.
Comment by gulfwargrunt — November 8, 2007 @ 10:15 am
Oh, but if the skin parade is on Fox, that’s PATRIOTIC bawdiness. Not to be confused with shameless sexual exploitation in media not owned by Murdoch — THAT’S immoral.
/sarc off
November 8th, 2007 at 10:22 amAs long as it means I can pay for XM radio a la carte and quit paying for crap like Air America, I’m fine with that.
Comment by TCDon — November 8, 2007 @ 10:18 am
yes, you really need to increase your ignorance level, until you’re too stupid to breathe, unless it’s too late for that. keep swilling that koolaid, 24%er! kiss the GOP goodbye as well.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:23 amAs long as it means I can pay for XM radio a la carte and quit paying for crap like Air America, I’m fine with that.
Comment by TCDon — November 8, 2007 @ 10:18 am
Last time I looked, neither XM radio or Air America were on cable television.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:24 amThis story shouldn’t bother the leftoniards for two reasons:
1) Fox’s audience is supposedly made up of inbred red state hicks
2) Libfartians want to teach kindergartners sex-ed and give condoms to sixth graders, so exposure to such things fits right in with the plan.
Why oh why do progressaturds care so much about FOX when all we hear is how Fox is irrelevant?
November 8th, 2007 at 10:24 amABC is the same way. Sex, sex, sex.
Fox, of course, is State Sponsored Television.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:26 am1. My fellow Progressives-I posted this on an earlier thread but deserves repeating:
November 8th, 2007 at 10:27 amLulu the wonder troll posted from 8:55pm-3:36am. Looks like he/she spent his entire shift at the RNC disrupting this thread thanks to you contributers who just can’t help taking the trollbait. An important topic’s discussions were waisted discussing off topic/strawman arguments and slinging insults. Do you expect first time curious progressives to actually read through this BS and come back to contribute to an intelligent conversation when every other post is not relevant to the topic? PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS! I KNOW HOW HARD IT IS TO RESIST COUNTERING THEIR STUPIDITY BUT THERE ARE WAYS TO ACCOMPLISH THIS SWIFTLY WITHOUT DIRECTLY ENGAGING THESE PAID, DISRUPTING FLYING MONKEYS. They NEVER have a valid point and intentionally move off topic. Keep your focus friends and by all means DO NOT GIVE THE TROLLS WHAT THEY CRAVE MOST…ATTENTION.
Looks like the day shift has punched in (Minotaur). Funny…half man/half bull, huh. Sounds more like ALL bull(sh!t) to me. Please refrain from feeding this troll. They incite anger with their passive-aggressive droppings and HOPE you will respond in anger, They then act surprised that their ignorance incites frustration. They are nothing more than Administration strawmen by proxy and I well understand the temptation to vent all your frustrations to them. THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE HERE FOR. Please don’t fall for their act. They are well aware that their postings are factless and inciteful. Show some restraint, stick to the topic and remember… facts are the GOP’s enemy!
Fox News: Conservatives Gone Wild…all we need to see now is Anne Coulter’s…well does she even have one to begin with?
November 8th, 2007 at 10:31 amAn important topic’s discussions were waisted discussing off topic/strawman arguments and slinging insults.
Sounds more like ALL bull(sh!t) to me.
Yessir, both of these from the same person in the same post.
Shades of Hillary Clinton.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:31 ambill ‘falafel/loofah’ oreilly is the foxface for decency!?
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:32 amShades of Hillary Clinton.
Comment by Minotaur — November 8, 2007 @ 10:31 am
The next President.
Hahaha. Joke’s on you.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:34 amXM has 170 channels to choose from and someone b!tches about the ONE that refutes and lays to waste the wingnut philosophy…
i would have no problem with fox channels if my cable bill
November 8th, 2007 at 10:36 amwas only $13/month…
.
My family likes to watch Dancing with the Stars and we have to change channel during commercials because of the ABC sex-based prime time promos. One after another…
November 8th, 2007 at 10:36 amThis story shouldn’t bother my intellectual superiors for two reasons:
Comment by Minotaur — November 8, 2007 @ 10:24 am
We’re not bothered. It’s hilarious. Nothing funnier then watching O’Reilly complain about the declining morality of the U.S. while showing a 20 second ad detailing the decline. Republicans are all about embracing hypocrisy. It’s funny to point it out… again & again.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:40 amWhy oh why do progressaturds care so much about FOX when all we hear is how Fox is irrelevant?
Comment by Minotaur — November 8, 2007 @ 10:24 am
Just a dose of your own medicine, kicking you when you’re down, for fun.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:44 ami remember when jon stewart did a piece on the spring break murder story… hard to take it serious when boobies are abouncin’ in close-up and the guy telling the story is on a 1″ screen…
first rule of advertiseing, though, isn’t it? … sex sells…
always has… always will…
but, it’s the hypocrisy in this case…
November 8th, 2007 at 10:45 amSo Fox uses the clips to show what they are speaking out against. How dare they!
November 8th, 2007 at 10:46 amSo Fox uses the clips to show what they are speaking out against. How dare they!
Comment by Roger_Roger — November 8, 2007 @ 10:46 am
and here is the prime example of troll stupid. thanks, Rx2, you’ve shown us all what naked hypocrisy combined with room-temperature IQ produces. You should have a show on FOX, you have reached the bottom!
November 8th, 2007 at 10:48 amSo Fox uses the clips to show what they are speaking out against. How dare they!
Comment by Roger_Roger — November 8, 2007 @ 10:46 am
Using that logic pro-lifers should all have abortions to demonstrate how devastating it is.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:50 amSo Fox uses the clips to show what they are speaking out against. How dare they!
Comment by Roger_Roger — November 8, 2007 @ 10:46 am
rr’s right. more porno please!
November 8th, 2007 at 10:52 amI take it you support censorship, then?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 10:53 am
Only of antiAmerican treason. O’Reily and Hannity should be jailed for sedition and giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:55 amAnd that, of course, is an outright lie. Do all liberals lie like that?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 10:55 am
Proof that it’s a lie? Do all conturds have IQs in the negative digits?
November 8th, 2007 at 10:57 amMinotaur must be working on its own insult thesaurus with its frequent use of “cute” names for liberals and progressives. I wonder if it could be “best seller” in the right-wing manner.
November 8th, 2007 at 10:57 amRuppert Murdoch knows that softcore pornography sells, that’s why Fox “News” only hires young, attractive women and they make them wear above the knee cut skirts, while at the same time they deploy a camera on the gound so they can get close ups on their legs and even some upskirt shots.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:00 amSeriously, for what other reason would a “news” channel put their cameras on the ground?
Also, Murdoch actually sells pornography. He has a quasi
“news” paper with naked women in it. Google “page 3″ and you’ll see Murdoch’s pornography.
And to think, Murdoch is a right wing Republican saint.
I’m not a liberal.
Follow the money.
Any media that supports politicians the way FOX does is clearly State Sponsored.
I love America. I hate politicians. FOX loves politicians.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:00 amNo, if Hillary becomes the next Prez, the joke will actually be on you.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 10:59 am
Desperate, bigfoot? A Dem candidate destroying the GOP is a joke on me? Are you dabbling in meth or huffing glue today? We already have your joke, busily destroying the economy and losing all of his wars, in the White House. Another Clinton will create another surplus, another strong economy, and put America back in the world’s good graces again. No wonder you’re scared shitless. You should be.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:03 amI take it you support censorship, then?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 10:53 am
hooray! o. bigfoot’s on the fox porno band wagon too!
November 8th, 2007 at 11:05 amWell if O’Reilly doesn’t warn us of the inherent dangers of Girls Gone Wild and Girls Gone Wild II and Girls Gone Wild Las Vegas Edition, how are we going to know? I don’t see Bill Moyers or Jim Lehrer tackling this very important subject!
November 8th, 2007 at 11:05 amWell if O’Reilly doesn’t warn us of the inherent dangers of Girls Gone Wild and Girls Gone Wild II and Girls Gone Wild Las Vegas Edition, how are we going to know? I don’t see Bill Moyers or Jim Lehrer tackling this very important subject!
Comment by toasterhead — November 8, 2007 @ 11:05 am
don’t forget billy’s helpers o. bigfoot and roger_roger, they’re wallowing in fox porno right now!
November 8th, 2007 at 11:09 amAnd as for sedition and treason, you’d better thank God you wake up in the United States each morn. In many countries, you would have already dissapeared without a trace by now.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:05 am
and you’d love that, wouldn’t you, you supporter of treason and antiAmericanism. I’ve given O’reilly and Hannity their chance to show me that they aren’tt raitors and neocon bagmen, and they’ve proven that they are exclusively on the side of America’s biggest and most dangerous enemies: the rightwing treason organization known as the Bush GOP. I tell you this: when Bush is hanged for war crimes and treason against the USA, I will be in the front row. Sedition and treason are the hallmarks of the Bush administration, and they are the ones who should be afraid to go to sleep, lest they wake up in solitary confinement. Your continued support of treason and sedition marks you as well.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:09 amBoth O’Reilly and Hannity do more for the United States and our troops in one day, than you have done in a lifetime.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:05 am
This is so true. So very true. They’ve brought 3,856 of our brave soldiers much closer to God.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:09 amIs this why The Dick Cheney always requests TV’s turned to Fox News in his hotel rooms???
November 8th, 2007 at 11:10 amAs long as it means I can pay for XM radio a la carte and quit paying for crap like Air America, I’m fine with that.
Comment by TCDon — November 8, 2007 @ 10:18 am
You can see naked people on your XM radio because I can’t, dumbass. And in major markets Air America is on the air for free, stooge.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:11 amIs this why The Dick Cheney always requests TV’s turned to Fox News in his hotel rooms???
Comment by WaltinTexas — November 8, 2007 @ 11:10 am
if you’ve seen lynn, you can’t blame him.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:11 amFox News: Conservatives Gone Wild…all we need to see now is Anne Coulter’s…well does she even have one to begin with?
Comment by kwintessential reason — November 8, 2007 @ 10:31 am
Nobody ever needs to see that. You’ll scratch your own eyes out if you do. Just a friendly warning.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:15 amGood point, Lefty.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:15 amI don’t support censorship.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:19 amI oppose State Sponsored TV masquerading as “news and entertainment”, which is illegal.
i remember when jon stewart did a piece on the spring break murder story… hard to take it serious when boobies are abouncin’ in close-up and the guy telling the story is on a 1″ screen…
Comment by katy — November 8, 2007 @ 10:45 am
Kind of reminds me of the old joke about the two elderly straight-laced ladies who happen upon a skin mag in the grocery store checkout line:
First lady: Shocking! Just shocking!
Second lady: And just wait until you see what’s on page 43!
Yes — showing a great deal of naked skin to illustrate how much you condemn the practice makes about as much sense as those two elderly ladies.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:19 ambigo – I don’t want censorship, just that I find it funny that billo was a 3rd rate news reporter so he had to become a Faux entertainer and haniteehee was a Uber-right wing truck driver before he got his own show. Goes to show how easily the Righties are entertained.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:19 amBoth O’Reilly and Hannity do more for the United States and our troops in one day, than you have done in a lifetime.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:05 am
Bigfool has gobbled up the propaganda hook, line and sinker. He’s such an idiot he doesn’t even know it. People like him are what’s wrong with America. Too stupid to know they’ve been duped and taking us all down with them.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:21 amGoes to show how easily the Righties are entertained.
Comment by upside99 — November 8, 2007 @ 11:19 am
Also demonstrates how low the standards are at FAUX. No wonder intelligent people can’t stomach it.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:22 amTypical NeoConservative hypocracy, Repukes are either closeted gays or perverts.
They can’t relate to regular close relations between partners.
Could it be all the guilt from being Christofascists?
In advertising though (which I is my job) sex, puppies, babies are what sells.
Buck Fush
November 8th, 2007 at 11:22 amBoth O’Reilly and Hannity do more for the United States and our troops in one day, than you have done in a lifetime.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:05 am
and yet you can’t point out a single thing they’ve actually done to prop up your bullshit lie. what a surprise.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:23 amAlso demonstrates how low the standards are at FAUX. No wonder intelligent people can’t stomach it.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:22 am
They have to pair up to get the average IQ above 100.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:23 amthe trolls sure are passionate about their fox porno, aren’t they?
November 8th, 2007 at 11:25 amthe trolls sure are passionate about their fox porno, aren’t they?
Comment by joe cantwell — November 8, 2007 @ 11:25 am
Yea, I heard Britney, the Double-wide Queenie, will be showing her cooz as billo’s lead-in “human-interest story” tonight.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:27 amShe certainly won’t be know as “Slick Hillyâ€.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:28 am
Nor will she be known as the worst president in history, as Georgie-boy has that wrapped up. And socialized health insurance is a sure bet, as soon as we rid this country of the thieves and liars now actively working against the American people, the GOP, your party of perverts, liars, thieves, mass-murderers and traitors. Bill’s blow-job is still all you can come up with, while your congressional delegation propositions cops and chases pages around the halls of Congress. You’ll note that Bill Clinton still maintains a 60+% approval rating, while George Bush is still the one guy that allowed a successful, major terror attack on the USA and has done nothing about it since, except make money for his cronies. Nothing except profit for the gOP traitor scum. Republicans have proven themselves weak on natonal defense, incompetent on disaster relief, destroyers of the economy, and pals of the Chinese communists. The 24% is an inflated figure, by the way. Your real approval raings are about half that, and falling. Enjoy Hillary’s reign of terror on the vast rightwing conspiracy; she’s been waiting a long time for payback. I’m buying popcorn stocks.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:39 amYea, I heard Britney, the Double-wide Queenie, will be showing her cooz as billo’s lead-in “human-interest story†tonight.
Comment by upside99 — November 8, 2007 @ 11:27 am
Well, Coulter will be salivating.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:40 amComment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:28 am
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
interesting note there cowboy… but what does it have to do with the gop love of fox porno? please stay on point.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:44 amComment by Lefty Patriot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:39 am
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
mega facts… nice. all O has is “shady dealings” and innuendo. point to lefty patriot.
eh?
November 8th, 2007 at 11:46 amDon’t you remember the news hitting a few weeks back about how President Bush was counciling the “Democrat front-runner� Why for?
***********************************
Because he is an arrogant pric* who thinks he’s literally God’s gift to politics and that he should be obeyed and followed without question. Plus, he likes to say “Democrat party”. Finally, he’s avoiding giving any advice to the Republican candidates. Why for?
November 8th, 2007 at 11:49 ammega facts… nice. all O has is “shady dealings†and innuendo. point to lefty patriot.
eh?
Comment by joe cantwell — November 8, 2007 @ 11:46 am
Being factual, it will be ignored by bigfoot. but he has no comeback, so it should be good for a few more laughs at his expense. if he can tear himself away from FOX PORNO for a minute.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:51 amLooks like bigfoot’s blind fear and loathing of Hil and the Dems has him up at night, wondering how to maintain the status quo, which he finds so wonderful.
Gonna suck for him when the Iraq invasion ends, the budget gets balanced, the economy is back on track, gas is below $3, the military is rebuilt, the Constitution is restored and the US is again a respected entity.
How sh!tty will that be for everyone, huh?
November 8th, 2007 at 11:51 amFinally, he’s avoiding giving any advice to the Republican candidates. Why for?
Comment by PatrioticLiberalChristian — November 8, 2007 @ 11:49 am
Because he can’t run fast enough to catch them as they flee from his poisonous presence.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:52 amHow sh!tty will that be for everyone, huh?
Comment by upside99 — November 8, 2007 @ 11:51 am
Not so fast. Bill got a blowjob.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:52 amYea, I heard Britney, the Double-wide Queenie, will be showing her cooz as billo’s lead-in “human-interest story†tonight.
Comment by upside99 — November 8, 2007 @ 11:27 am
Well, Coulter will be salivating.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:40 am
And his/her oversized Adam’s Apple be going up and down like a pogo stick!!
November 8th, 2007 at 11:53 amNot so fast. Bill got a blowjob.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:52 am
Oh yea, and that, too.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:54 amFUX is the outward expression of *everything* that is wrong with the Reichwing. Murdoch is the master of cynical manipulation.
Schizophrenic, bi-polar, full of hatred, racism, bigotry, misogyny, violence and sex – overlaid with ranting fundamentalist Christianity, smarmy, hostile and rabid “America – love it or leave it” nationalism and sickeningly saccharine “Mom, flag and apple pie” all-American “patriotism.”
It’s toxic enough to make a sane person sick to their stomach. Or throw a brick through their television.
November 8th, 2007 at 11:56 amif he can tear himself away from FOX PORNO for a minute.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — November 8, 2007 @ 11:51 am
you ask for the impossible. O is not the “master of his domain”. it’s in neil cavuto’s hands and he’s not letting go. right O?
November 8th, 2007 at 11:56 amI lived quite well through all 8 years of Clinton’s Presidency, despite the national embarrasment caused by Bill’s personal foibles, his lying to cover them up, and both Clinton’s shady personal business dealings.
sorry about the OT, but i finally got an answer to a long time question
i’ve had: just what is the clinton hate all about?
and that’s IT? 70million tax payer dollars later?
it just doesn’t jibe… especially when those clinton haters “lived quite well” BECAUSE of the clinton years…
ok… i’ve always wanted to know that…
November 8th, 2007 at 11:58 ambut if i had asked that one directly, i STILL wouldn’t know…
…
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:00 pm
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
finished jacking off already? man you’re fast!
November 8th, 2007 at 12:03 pmHannity – Freedom Concerts.
O’Reilly – Families of Military Casualties.
Whoops, there’s two things. Shall I continue? Or do you look foolish enough as it is?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:00 pm
oh, so you haven’t read about the scandals surrounding the profit margins for these hacks, exploiting the service members they so gleefully send to their deaths, and then making a nice, fat paycheck? why an I not surprised? Freedom Concerts, my ass. Failure Concerts is more accurate. Nice try, bigfoot, but we know that the moral standards you on the right hold dear start with “what’s in it for me”.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:04 pmComment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:00 pm
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
now we know what the “O.” stands for.
eh?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:04 pmComment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:04 pm
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
O.
onanism
Main Entry:
onan·ism
Pronunciation:
\ˈÅ-nÉ™-ËŒni-zÉ™m\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
probably from New Latin onanismus, from Onan, son of Judah (Genesis 38:9)
Date:
circa 1741
1 : masturbation 2 : coitus interruptus 3 : self-gratification
fits O. Bigfoot like a republican glove.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:07 pmWhy do Bush supporters always have to justify their decider’s screw ups by saying Clinton did it too. Hey, nobody is arguing that Clinton and all the past Presidents had their little games.
But Bush is the meanest, most ignorant of any so far. So, stop trying to justify by saying Billy did it too. So far Bush has outdone all the dirty work of all Presidents in history.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:11 pmOnce again, when a kook lib is faced with facts, they merely ignore the facts.
Again, no surprise here.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:08 pm
Onan, stop now. before you go blind. and can’t troll anymore. don’t let fox porno turn you into a rancid, clotted, republican neo-con, sex perv.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:13 pmtook plenty of time out for fun.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:12 pm
i’m sure you did Onan. but it was the wrong kind of “fun”, wasn’t it?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:15 pm#73 Katy I really think it kills Bush people because the American public really liked Clinton. And it very apparent that Clinton did not screen his taxpayer paid visits. Dissent was allowed and heard.
We have two journalists in jail right now, one for 6 years with no charges listed because of dissent toward this administration. That is shocking beyond belief.
Bush supporters can’t stand the fact that we had world credibility and good economics during Clinton. How they can justify spending so much money to find out if Clinton had sex is incredible.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:17 pmMainstream America does not look for government to solve our problems, nor do we need government’s permission to succeed.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:12 pm
You’re not mainstream America, you’re the righwing treason fringe. you don’t, and never could, speak for mainstream America, you delusional liar. You’re in the 24%, or don’t you pay any attention?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:17 pm“Hey, now more libs will watch Fox news! Outstanding!â€
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:16 pm
Onan that’s a pretty funny line, give yourself a hand!
(ooops, sorry)
eh?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:19 pmHey Bigfoot how do you like paying those payroll taxes for your people? Did it occur to you that if the government lowered the payroll tax maybe you could pay your employees a living wage or even pay toward insurance for them?
If you are doing fine now, I would bet you did really well during Clinton years. So blowhard somewhere else.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:20 pm#87 I heard last night the approval for Bush is now at 21% dropping 3% in a week. I wonder how he can go.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:23 pmAnd isn’t Onan a brand of RV generator? Be careful of trademark infringment there, joe.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:20 pm
not surprising that you don’t even recognize your own king. your ignorance places you squarely in the lunatic fringe.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:23 pmMainstream America does not look for government to solve our problems, nor do we need government’s permission to succeed.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:12 pm
And in Bigfootland, the government apparently has zero effect on the economy. Someone alert the Fed! And the Republicans can lay off the “no new tax” mantra because taxes apparently have zero effect on the economy as well.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:24 pm“spelunking”
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:20 pm
“spelunking”? sounds like commie fun to me.
don’t know who Onan (your namesake) was? don’t you read your bible?
he was a famous “seed spiller”. just like you.
eh?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:25 pm“spelunking� sounds like commie fun to me.
Comment by joe cantwell — November 8, 2007 @ 12:25 pm
I used to have friends that went spelunking on acid, which I always thought was a little weird.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:27 pmcamping, backcountry exploration, hiking, spelunking, gold mining, boating
I wonder if he-man, no government help for me Bigmouth enjoyed any of these activities in government protected and maintained parks or recreational areas?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:28 pmI didn’t start my business until 2003, when Bush was already prez. Back during the Clinton years, I worked for someone else.
I’m not crediting George Bush with creating the economic situation to allow starting my own business. That was my idea, and mine alone.
As for my “peopleâ€: When I have any, they are contracted sales people, and handle their own taxes.
My business can easily be run as a one person show, which is fine by me, because I don’t have to worry about what’s going on when I am on one of my extended stays in the backcountry.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:29 pm
so that’s what it’s like to run your own porno empire… wow. no wonder you’re so passionate.
eh?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:31 pmyou ask for the impossible. O is not the “master of his domainâ€. it’s in neil cavuto’s hands and he’s not letting go. right O?
Comment by joe cantwell — November 8, 2007 @ 11:56 am
O salivating over Fox would be out of the contest faster than Kramer was.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:32 pm“a one person show”
Comment by joe cantwell — November 8, 2007 @ 12:31 pm
your life is a “one person show”.
eh?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:33 pmComment by O. Bigfoot @ 12:12 pm
wow… a direct response…
November 8th, 2007 at 12:34 pmdelusional, in denial, but a response… thanks?…
O’Reilly – Families of Military Casualties.
Whoops, there’s two things. Shall I continue? Or do you look foolish enough as it is?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:00 pm
You mean like Cindy Sheehan and Pat Tillman’s family. What exactly did O’Reilly do for them?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:34 pmOnce again, when a kook lib is faced with facts, they merely ignore the facts.
Again, no surprise here.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:08 pm
What facts did you give. You didn’t even have complete sentences. What proof do you have that these two did anything that helped anybody? All you gave us were two “campaign” slogans.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:37 pmWell bigfoot society is made up of people working for the good of the society and since you are a definite loner I can understand your appreciation of someone who cares nothing for the responsibilities he took an oath to uphold. Enjoy your backwoods you may have to live there when society falls apart from your man’s dictatorship.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:40 pmShayne – Pat Tillman and Cindy’s son would be the phoney soldiers Rush admonished, since both were questioning the legality of Bush’s war.
I wonder when Rush’s listeners will finally get sick of his mocking of children, sick people and soldiers who question Bush.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:42 pmIf you have any knowledge of the issue, you know that due to cutbacks and budget shortfalls, public lands are protected and maintained far less than they used to be.
If you consider 1 Ranger for every 500 to 1000 square miles “protectedâ€, then you need to do some serious thinking.
Some of the backcountry places I explore, I don’t see another person for days on end (except for those traveling with me), let alone any Rangers. And I like it that way.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:39 pm
As long as you’re happy, I suppose we should all be grateful that this administration has reduced protection of public lands. That’s a really big plus you’ve identified for us, Bigfoot. Because we all know that public land, national parks, national forests, et al should just be left to the devices of ranchers and miners. I bet you’d love that on your back country hikes, wouldn’t you? A few strip mines here and there, no problem.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:43 pmBigFoot since you enjoy being out in the woods take a look around at what your leaders want to do to the great outdoors. They will allow any corporation go in and ravage the beautiful woods and land for their greed. There will not be clean air and woods to walk in if this bunch gets their way.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:44 pmI wonder when Rush’s listeners will finally get sick of his mocking of children, sick people and soldiers who question Bush.
Comment by texaslady — November 8, 2007 @ 12:42 pm
I don’t want to wait for his listeners to figure it out. I’d like somebody to slap him silly before that. I bet he’s afraid to go out in public already. I’d like to see him go up to Alaska.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:45 pm“utteration”
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:43 pm
so ya like utters, huh?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:46 pmWell if O. Bigtool is happy I’m happy. He’s all that matters. The hell with my kid, her friends and their kids. When they tear up the national park he likes he can go spelunk himself somewhere else.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:48 pmYou shouldn’t need a conservative such as me to hold your hand for you.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:47 pm
hey onan speaking of hands, did you meet yours on eharmony.com?
November 8th, 2007 at 12:49 pm“Been around long, joe? Most of the regulars here already know what I do for a living. Do us a favor: Know of what you speak prior to utteration,
eh?
Comment by O. Bigfoot ”
Bigfoot is a coyote who runs “illegals” across the border, which is what he really does out on his “extended backcountry trips”. And it’s why he doesn’t want amnesty for undocumented workers, it will put him out of business.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:53 pmBigfoot is a coyote who runs “illegals†across the border, which is what he really does out on his “extended backcountry tripsâ€. And it’s why he doesn’t want amnesty for undocumented workers, it will put him out of business.
Comment by Bobwurst — November 8, 2007 @ 12:53 pm
now that’s the kind of “utteration” onan and i like!
November 8th, 2007 at 12:54 pmBut that’s another topic.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:54 pm
from fox porno to mining? when it comes to switching topics you’re the king onan!
November 8th, 2007 at 12:56 pm“Yeah….yeah…..That’s the ticket!!!
I suppose I do quite well for someone who doesn’t speak a lick of Spanish, eh Bobwurst?
Comment by O. Bigfoot ”
Si, jefe…
November 8th, 2007 at 12:58 pmYour definition of society is completely incorrect. However, if your “dictatorship scenario†ever actually developed, I would be fully prepared.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:45 pm
I’m dying to know what your definition of “society” is, Bigfoot. Apparently, it is distinct from either a dictionary or a historical definition. I can see why you chose “Bigfoot” as a nickname, though, because the rest of human culture has advanced considerably based on the concept of cooperation for the greater good. We’d still be scratching for grubs if we hadn’t made that evolutionary turn, and not even have reached the hunter-gatherer stage.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:58 pmWhat I heard about Sean Insanity’s Freedom Concerts was that the actual amount of money that went to the charity was only FOUR CENTS for every dollar that came in….
Woohoo. Big man. Big effing deal.
November 8th, 2007 at 12:58 pmsuppose I do quite well for someone who doesn’t speak a lick of Spanish, eh Bobwurst?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:57 pm
“lick”? onan? you dog!
November 8th, 2007 at 12:59 pmWell, Bonjour, ya’all..got some work to do.
Have fun!
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:58 pm
onan. quitters never win. winners never quit. accept the lord jesus christ as your personal savior. before it’s too late.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:00 pmthanks gummitch. you scared him off.
there’s goes our fun.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:02 pmHmm…hate to interupt, however briefly, the O’Reilly bashfest, but it looks like he is being quoted favorably on Media Matters for defending Bill and Hillary.
O’REILLY: You see, I don’t believe anything the press writes about Bill and Hillary Clinton at all.
STORM: Oh, really?
O’REILLY: No. I think they make it up. You know, it’s — and I do this because they make stuff up about me. They make stuff up about any controversial figure. So, they’re sitting around going, “What can we say about Bill Clinton?” We tracked it yesterday, and we couldn’t find any Swift boat reference that Bill Clinton –”
O’Reilly. Getting good press on Media Matters. Defending the Clintons.
Can someone living on either coast check to see if the sea is boiling?
November 8th, 2007 at 1:06 pmOh, oh Leftside Annie, you hit the Bigboob with facts and he went running off with his tail between his legs. I think it was his tail anyway.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:06 pmShayne you are much more kind than I am regarding Rush, Alaska is too nice for the likes of that looney loser.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful to have a conservative talking head that actually made sense, someone that you could listen to and perhaps find factually information. They all just sound insane using lies for talking points. Olbermann totally showed up every lie O’Reilly professed. I would think they would feel very foolish being shown up in their lying.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:07 pmComment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 1:02 pm
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
onan! bon jour! i knew you’d come back.
http://www.foxnews.com, is this a favorite porno site of yours? i hope you block it from the kids.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:08 pmWhat you heard was wrong, Annie. Quite reading the lib blogs and get some real news.
May I suggest:
http://www.foxnews.com
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 1:02
Sure OB it’s Annie who’s not getting the real news. Do you even see the irony here?
November 8th, 2007 at 1:08 pmComment by Keltoi — November 8, 2007 @ 1:06 pm
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
i’ll check with onan’s favorite porno site, http://www.foxnews.com.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:09 pmmaybe the sea is boiling…
Keltoi, I take it this is the first time you’ve gone to Media Matters. Who sent you? O’Reilly?
November 8th, 2007 at 1:10 pmActually I saw Bill Clinton angrily go after someone in the crowd asking about 9/11 being an inside job. My thought, we are still allowed to question our suspicions aren’t we or has that right been taken while I was sleeping.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:11 pmtexaslady, since Fox News viewers are too dumb to change the channel they won’t realize they’re being lied to. Witness OB and Keltoi.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:13 pmBush supporters are the most closed minded individuals I have every heard. I am a progressive yet some conservative issues I agree with. It doesn’t have to be a one note only thinking process.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:22 pmBeen around long, joe? Most of the regulars here already know what I do for a living.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — November 8, 2007 @ 12:43 pm
More arrogance – assuming that regulars would care enough to remember what he alleges to do for a living.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:23 pmKeltoi, I take it this is the first time you’ve gone to Media Matters. Who sent you? O’Reilly?
Comment by Shayne — November 8, 2007 @ 1:10 pm
Of course not, MM is bookmarked, as is TP, Slate, Salon, BBC, ad nauseum. I have never seen them say anything good about O’Reilly, which is why it struck me as noteworthy to this thread. In a truly crowning irony, the conservative Newsbusters was ridiculing him for what he said, but I read the transcript of Bill Clintons remarks and he DIDN’T compare the swiftboaters to the other Dem candidates – not sure who or what the genesis of the supposed comparison was, but it is not in the text.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:24 pmHa ha ha, Bigfoot says that O’Reilly/Hannity do lots for the troops. His evidence? Freedom concerts. Now think about yourself as a soldier fighting a clusterphuck in Iraq (of course Bigfoot can’t imagine that, chickenhawk that he is). You’ve got the Reps with their neverending war spiced up with Freedom Concerts & the Dems trying to end the war & bring the troops home. Which flavor of support do you think the troops prefer?
If Reps really want to support the troops they should either end the war or join the war. Otherwise their support is nothing more then lip service.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:27 pmBill Maher went after somebody in his audience for questioning 9/11. I guess all questions are off the table regarding that day, texaslady. Silly us for asking questions.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:30 pmMore arrogance – assuming that regulars would care enough to remember what he alleges to do for a living.
Comment by PatrioticLiberalChristian — November 8, 2007 @ 1:23 pm
Exactly what I was thinking.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:31 pmbut I read the transcript of Bill Clintons remarks and he DIDN’T compare the swiftboaters to the other Dem candidates – not sure who or what the genesis of the supposed comparison was, but it is not in the text.
Comment by Keltoi — November 8, 2007 @ 1:24 pm
So did most of us. Do you think we need your help with our cause. Puhlease. And you people forget most of us aren’t Hillary fans either.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:33 pmThat’s what they mean by log cabin conservatives? Watching porn on Fox? I always figured he was running a meth house but smuggling illegals is a possibility too. Either way it’s easy to see he’s no pillar of his community.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:38 pmApparently Bill Maher doesn’t like people bringing up subjects he is ignorant on. Especially since he presents all his facts like they’re the first time any of us ever heard them.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:39 pmi wonder if this is related:
http://www.foxnews.com/photoessay/0,4644,2621,00.html
November 8th, 2007 at 1:46 pmBill needs to watch his back. The Total Falafel Awareness Program is on to him.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:56 pmYes, this is a rare valid point made by lib blogs. Fox is skating very close to the line on this.
Laura Ingraham has been railing about the “pornofication” of our culture, which was lead by the left, but occurring even on the right, as you’ve revealed.
This is similar to another story showing Chris Matthews begging one of his female contributors to “get closer to the camera”. In that case, it was obvious Chris Matthews crossed the line.
November 8th, 2007 at 1:57 pmShayne I saw that show with Bill Maher physically throwing the people out. Well, it was his show. But at the Clinton deal, it was an open audience and Clinton shouted and pointed his finger, saying “How dare you say that.” That really surprised me.
Seems like any whisper of a question and there is instant repercussion. On the Rosie deal, she just asked how a building #7 could come down from fire hours later ? She did not say inside job or allude to an inside job. Yet, O’Reilly kept striking and striking at her.
What is wrong or unpatriotic about questioning? I’d like to know why the camera tapes from all around the Pentagon have never been released to see the plane hitting it. If it is too painful for some to watch don’t watch.
November 8th, 2007 at 2:23 pmLaura Ingraham has been railing about the “pornofication†of our culture, which was lead by the left, but occurring even on the right, as you’ve revealed.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — November 8, 2007 @ 1:57 pm
So we’re to assume that the people making billions of dollars selling porn are leftists? Are you joking?
November 8th, 2007 at 3:07 pmPredictions of the next 911 by a Professional Geologist.
http://www.H2onE2.com Glacial Respiration, Conceptual Ring of Ice, The End of Linear Western Religion
A Geological Exploration of an E2 Earthen Planet And the H2 Human Species
Author: B Billy Marse, Professional Geologist
Brief Description:
http://www.H2onE2.com is an exploration of the universe, geology, climate, biology, humans, psychology, folklore and ancient structures to uncover the beginning and disclose the end of linear western religion. The true DaVinci Code behind the bible is not a supreme spiritual power but a scientific record of climate change described as Glacial Respiration. The Greek philosophers originated the practice of communicating a hidden idea or message in the short story format, as a metaphor. In the bible, metaphors conceal historic climate change within the fanciful stories. The theory of Glacial Respiration explains the myth behind the Holy Grail, structures such as the Great Pyramids, Stonehenge, Easter Island and is the knowledge that was collected in the Jewish Ark of the Covenant.
The environmental changes of Glacial Respiration determine all biological evolution and can explain why higher forms of intelligent humans developed. Further, Glacial Respiration releases the secret hidden by the Knights Templars, Masonic Order and all religions. Uncovers an advanced Blue-Blooded semi-industrial Atlantian Civilization that was built and destroyed many times over for the last million years. The book ends with an explanation of how linear western religion will be physically ended and describes the construction of the doomsday device capable of fulfilling its own self defining prophesy, “Revelationsâ€. H2onE2 is a mind-expanding experience that stimulates the soul, instinct, intellect and is an almanac to the past, present and future of humanity. Rise, awaken and evolve into H3 human consciousness.
The discovery:
November 9th, 2007 at 4:59 pmAs a Professional Geologist, I attempted to link the Dust Bowl/Great Depression to a pre-glacial condition or mechanism and ended up writing the book H2onE2. I felt that there was a strong connection between the Dust Bowl and transition back into Glacial Winter. I did notice that my professors scientifically crumbled every time I mentioned the relationship. I could not go back in time or locate indisputable proof. The proof came from understanding all educational disciplines including history and theology. I soon discovered that all religious text both eastern and western continually described significant climate change conditions relating to Glacial Respiration. For years I fought off mixing science and religion until I discovered that the origins of all religions were founded or created to help humans psychologically survive the harsh earthen environment. Without reason I soon accepted that the world’s complicated religions were the same. This came true and I continued to write and discover. Everything came into place as though I was unlocking a 10,000-year-old puzzle. I also realized this puzzle was opened before I discovered it, by someone else, some other group. If so, further understanding of this knowledge might be extracted from significant historical events. Lastly, this is the vital information needed to make future predictions.
tjtuyjyj