Comment by Gregor Samsa — November 11, 2007 @ 10:07 pm
——————-

Please, understand this: have you ever tried to prove the negative?

That’s what Bolton is all about. He throws accusations at you and you’re supposed to defend yourself and prove that HE’S wrong while he, and those in the MSM, don’t worry if his charges are based on fact.

It’s somewhat like saying: prove to me that you’re not a child molester!

Was he not a thug for the US Attorney’s Office at the time?

The clock should have stopped for him at that moment but since it did not, this twit is now part of the coup that gave the Supremes a new tune, 5 to 4.

Comment by Gregor Samsa — November 11, 2007 @ 10:07 pm

These people use fear as the way to manipulate the American public in supporting all kinds of unAmerican behavior — preventative war, torture, spying on Americans, and an incredibly long list of other unconstitutional and FASCIST actions. Time to put these nuts back in the asylum they escaped from.

Why do people look at him with any credibility? Questioning the world recognized IAEA chief who is the nobel prize winner.

Shame on CNN to bring this low life to their program and giving him air time.

“The U.N. and U.S. intelligence sources have known for some time that Saddam Hussein has materials to produce chemical and biological weapons, but he has not accounted for them:
26,000 liters of anthrax—enough to kill several million people
38,000 liters of botulinum toxin
500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agents
Almost 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents
From three Iraqi defectors, we know that Iraq in the late 1990s had several mobile biological weapons labs. But he has not disclosed them.”

These were all lies. The “yellowcake from Africa” was known to be based on a poor forgery eleven months before it went into the SOTU Speech. The aluminum tubes use for nuclear weapons, also in the speech, was known to be false eleven months before.

The Mohammed Atta meeting in Prague was a lie. The ties to al Qaeda was a lie. The drones were a lie. The shack in the north was a lie.

Everything Mohamed ElBaradei, the IAEA, Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, and the other weapons inspectors said was true. Nothing they said was false.

Saddam did turn over about 20,000 pages accounting for past materials.

Correct, but, if the clock is running backwards (i.e. RePugniScum time) then the clock is NEVER right. Why?

Even though the hands of a clock running backwards crosses time with a correct clock running forwards the backwards running clock is always wrong. Why?

The backwards running clock is always wrong is its direction alone. Therefore never correct, just accidentally matching the comparision forward running correct clock ever so often.

And this would mean that Bolton is less than broken clock, because he and his pals in the Bush administration couldn’t be right even twice a day.

Saddam had the intellectual capability to put that program right back together.

But that was not how the war was sold to the American public. Prior to the invasion, the Bush administration insisted that Hussein’s WMD were a reality, that Hussein had “stockpiles” of “weapons of mass murder”, that Iraq was a “unique threat”, a “gathering threat”, etc.

The casus belli was built on the immediacy of the threat, not that Hussein could, maybe, perhaps, possibly, one day possess WMD.

Way to move the goal posts, Mr. Bolton.

I think [ElBaradei is] actually undermining the credibility of the IAEA by his overly politicized role in the Iran crisis.

Translation: The IAEA won’t bend to our will and is, therefore, “overly politicized”.

Of course, the US’ standoff with Iran has become a “crisis” because the Bush administration has decided to make it into one.

not the shinniest spoon in the drawer -

why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free-

why buy the pig if all you want is a little sausage -

All as relevant as Bolten and the entire Bush administration

Buck Fush

Of course, the bar keeps lowering. What amazes me about the neocon bobble-heads is that they not only get there facts wrong, they then make the worst possible choice given the wrong facts. These dangerous idiots couldn’t find a peanut in a bag of peanuts.

Comment by jb — November 11, 2007 @ 3:57 pm

They will just give the bears indigestion and give them tummy aches.
Some things just are not edible.