At a recent book party for former U.N. ambassador John Bolton, former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) told the Washington Examiner that conservatives in Congress need “some backbone.” As an example of what he means by “backbone,” DeLay described what he would like to do to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman: “I’d like to bitch-slap him.”

He should’ve said, “I’d like to squish him like a bug.”
November 20th, 2007 at 5:03 pmDelay gets to ride first class in the one-way plane ride to Gitmo!! HA!!
WHAT a looser…..
November 20th, 2007 at 5:05 pmAnd I’d like to smoke some drugs with Obama! Where’s the story of Obama keepin’ it real?!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:06 pmI’m sure you’d like to, Tom. Me? I’d like to see you try it.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:07 pmI WONDER WHEN TP WILL MENTION SCOTT MCLELLAN’S NEW BOOK?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:09 pmCome to think of it.. That would be pretty damn funny to see!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:09 pmI’m going to see Krugman speak on Nov.27th…. any questions y’all want me to ask?
:)
November 20th, 2007 at 5:10 pmDelay wants a sissy-fight with Krugman? C’mom Tom, threaten to pound him like a man. And then run like a girl when Paul brings some whoop-ass.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:12 pmGo ahead and try, bugman. You know he would kick your flabby fascist butt all to hell and back. None of you repukes have any courage at all. The only things you scum attack are children, women, puppies and kittens who can’t defend themselves from you cowards.
Bush/Cheney
Hague Trials ‘09
Buck Fush
November 20th, 2007 at 5:12 pmI WONDER WHEN TP WILL MENTION SCOTT MCLELLAN’S NEW BOOK?
Comment by whiteyfresh — November 20, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
Seven or eight entries ago. You’re a little late to that party…
November 20th, 2007 at 5:14 pmlol…mommy boy Delay couldn’t do anything….
have you seen him? he’s like that guy on the Green Mile that they locked up in the rubber room
November 20th, 2007 at 5:14 pmI WONDER WHEN TP WILL MENTION SCOTT MCLELLAN’S NEW BOOK?
Comment by whiteyfresh — November 20, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
Nice response: They mentioned as the first story of the the day after the Thinkfast thread today.
Not so nice response: If you would do a little reading first you would be able to answer your own question.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:14 pmHmmm…I think this is the first time I have heard a man use that term when speaking about another man — and neither man is gay.
But as amusing as that is, the real telling thing about such a statement is that it’s a mark of defeat. Whenever somebody b!tch-slaps someone, wants to b!tch-slap someone, or even just calls somebody a b!tch, it means they have run out of intelligent responses. Apparently DeLay is frustrated by Krugman, and this has happened to him.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:16 pmfirst off, I don’t have time to goof off at work like most people here,apparently.
second, It was 13 posts ago, not that it really matters, now, does it?
third, Nature Rules, guess momma didn’t raise you right, eh? PARDON ME.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:16 pmCome to think, ole Delay the Bugman just might be getting “B!tch-slapped” alot by his cellmate in prison. Good luck on that Buggy, bring lots of lube.
Shiver me timber with lube, Bush likes the tube. Arrrrggh matey.
Bush/Cheney
Hague Trials ‘09
Buck Fush
November 20th, 2007 at 5:18 pmToasterhead: Sorry bout that! But who doesn’t want to show up a little late to the party? That’s when it’s just getting started!
:D
November 20th, 2007 at 5:23 pmfirst off, I don’t have time to goof off at work like most people here,apparently.
second, It was 13 posts ago, not that it really matters, now, does it?
third, Nature Rules, guess momma didn’t raise you right, eh? PARDON ME.
Comment by whiteyfresh — November 20, 2007 @ 5:16 pm
My mom did just fine thanks. You will notice I gave the nice response first! AND the not so nice response wasn’t all that bad.
Oh and no, I’m not working this afternoon so I’m gleefully goofing off at my own expense!
Sorry if I offended, I thought it was somewhat funny to give two answers, no harm intended.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:25 pmCatfight!!!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:26 pmTom who?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:27 pmmeow!
Seriously…Tom Dealy tries to remain in the spotlight with this? Sheesh. What a puss.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:29 pmdon’t you have enough legal problems as it is? People that are out on bail should be a little better behaved.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:30 pmNature Rules….
I’m sorry…
due to Badmoonman being alllllll exited, I feel we should reconcile and move on. I work in a Bone Marrow Transplant Clinic and saw Sicko last night.
VERY rough day today…
the “mom” comment was childish. I’m better than that.
PS: Badmoonman-STFU, beeotch
November 20th, 2007 at 5:30 pmPuhhleeeaze, Tommy boy, go try it.
And when you’ve finished picking your dental work up off the sidewalk, I’ve got some bugs in the yard you can spray.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:31 pmAnyway, back to Krugman, should I ask him if he’d like to ‘open a can of whoop-ass’ on Delay?
:)
November 20th, 2007 at 5:31 pmzup RUC.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:31 pmDeLay: “conservatives in Congress need “some backbone.†- - Yo, Bugman, you quit Congress? How’s that spine of yours?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:32 pmwatchout, paul!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:32 pmtommy will scratch your eyes out!
(he fights like a girl)
oops, i guess that would be “zup RuC?”
November 20th, 2007 at 5:32 pmDeLay told Yeas & Nays that Republicans in Congress are “looking for something to believe in”
Obviously looking for something in a public restroom stall isn’t helping.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:32 pmLividLib- I just got a hilarious mental image of Delay, BOhNER, and McConnell all slap-hitting each other silly!!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:34 pmHey whitey! Just finishin up a daze work. Headin homeward right this minute!
Read y’all later.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:35 pmNature Rules….
I’m sorry…
due to Badmoonman being alllllll exited, I feel we should reconcile and move on. I work in a Bone Marrow Transplant Clinic and saw Sicko last night.
VERY rough day today…
the “mom†comment was childish. I’m better than that.
PS: Badmoonman-STFU, beeotch
Comment by whiteyfresh — November 20, 2007 @ 5:30 pm
We’re good whiteyfresh. Sorry about the bad day.
I would LOVE to see Krugman open a can of whoop-ass on Duhlay.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:36 pmhee-hee…
Krugman could then hose him with a beer truck and fire-hose…
November 20th, 2007 at 5:38 pmHe he, whiteyfresh and your comment made me picture the three stooges all slapping each other. Now that would be funny to see Delay, Boner and McConnell all stooge slapping each other.
NaaAAaaAAA, woob, woob, woob, woob. Heavens to murgatroid.
Buck Fush
November 20th, 2007 at 5:40 pmtest
November 20th, 2007 at 5:41 pmnyuk,nyuk,nyuk………………
November 20th, 2007 at 5:41 pmIsn’t Tom Delay the tough guy whose excuse for not serving in Vietnam was that all the minorities took the good positions in the military?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:41 pmKrugman could then hose him with a beer truck and fire-hose…
Comment by whiteyfresh — November 20, 2007 @ 5:38 pm
Using a low grade beer of course. More appropriate would be a good ‘beerboarding’ more commonly done willingly (or not) with a funnel at frat parties.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:41 pmBuckie, frikkin hilarious!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:41 pmWhy is TP filitering out my posts when I’m using the same term the story does?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:41 pmcan I be “beerboarded” with Brooklyn Pilsner?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:42 pm‘Beerboarding’ - did I just invent a new party game?!!?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:42 pmBrooklyn Pilsner!!! I am going to New York if February, I will have to try it.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:47 pmI do believe you did, NR!!!!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:47 pmIt’s great, but you should be able to get BP in most any “higher-end” beer shoppe.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:48 pmI’ll look for it but I’m in Western Canada so it may be tough to find.
It’s time to take the dogs for a walk. Then maybe I’ll work on some beerboarding rules that doesn’t involve drowning!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:50 pmIsn’t Tom Delay the tough guy whose excuse for not serving in Vietnam was that all the minorities took the good positions in the military?
Comment by scorpio83 — November 20, 2007 @ 5:41 pm
and just what kind of “position” was fat, pasty-assed DeLay looking for in the military?
November 20th, 2007 at 5:58 pmIt’s great, but you should be able to get BP in most any “higher-end†beer shoppe.
Comment by whiteyfresh — November 20, 2007 @ 5:48 pm
I don’t think Brooklyn beers get much distribution out of the immediate area, certainly not out west where we already have a lot of really good beer. I vaguely remember seeing some Brooklyn lager on a visit to California, but I wouldn’t expect that or their pilsner to be in good enough shape to drink anywhere outside the MidAtlantic.
November 20th, 2007 at 5:58 pmno,no,no! Brooklyn(TM) is just the Brand name! It’s a National beer as far as I understand.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:02 pmYeh, I noticed I got filtered for using the B!tch word as well.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:03 pmChilling & ugly comment from someone who says he speaks for God.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:07 pmWhenever somebody b!tch-slaps someone, wants to b!tch-slap someone, or even just calls somebody a b!tch, it means they have run out of intelligent responses. Apparently DeLay is frustrated by Krugman, and this has happened to him.
Comment by missmolly — November 20, 2007 @ 5:16 pm
Good point, miss molly. Of course, you’re overlooking another possibility; that tighty-righties inevitably embrace Violence before Reason. But I guess that’s just a function of the difficult relationship they tend to have with Reason. She’s been a cruel mistress to them… not even a mistress, really. More just a girl they imagine likes them but really has nothing to do with them.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:10 pmThe corrupt exterminator guy vs the guy with a conscience.
I’m betting on the Kruger man. Any takers?
November 20th, 2007 at 6:14 pmoop. Mid Atlantic-that’s me!
North CaKalac baybeeeeee!!!!!!!!
November 20th, 2007 at 6:14 pmBeerboarding
1)Put on Water Goggles that cover nose(the big, old school ones)
2)Lay on reverse incline, with head lower than feet.
3)have hot chick(or guy) sit on chest
4)Insert Keg nozzle and beerboard til you just cant take it anymorez!!!!
November 20th, 2007 at 6:17 pmThat’s it, Ralph!! Reichers are just a bunch of pissed-off, overgrown geeks who asked Reality to the prom - and she laughed in their pimply faces!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
November 20th, 2007 at 6:17 pmwhiteyfresh: according to their website, they actually have some Canadian distribution, even in BC. In the US, not so much; just the east coast. http://www.brooklynbrewery.com/find/
Garrett Oliver has connections with some British beer geeks, so they do have distribution in the UK. But, like I said, nothing out west.
I love the distribution zones, though, especially: Florida, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island
Heh.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:20 pmOh yeah, that’ll teach him Mr. Indicted Criminal. Seriously, why do people still want this guy’s opinion? He’s an indicted criminal, he’s been turned out of the house, he compares Dems to Nazis…….and yet this paper still solicits his opinion? If this was a student of mine, he would be in the office so quick. Of course it wouldn’t get to that point.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:22 pmTom Delay was probably looking for a cushy job with the National Guard stateside while everyone else deployed overseas to Vietnam. Like his buddy Dubya.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:32 pmor even just calls somebody a b!tch, it means they have run out of intelligent responses. Apparently DeLay is frustrated by Krugman, and this has happened to him.
Comment by missmolly — November 20, 2007 @ 5:16 pm
——————–
Missmolly: it’s their bully’s response.
Part of it is that they know they are intellectually inferior; they cannot compete in the FREE MARKET of ideas so they must suppress it.
Something to worry about until you realize that nature will take care of it!
November 20th, 2007 at 6:33 pmI would like Tom DeLay’s indictment to come to the top of the Justice Departments to-do list.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:43 pmChallenge him to try, Dr. Krugman. I got your back! No, really, the pleasure will be all mine.
November 20th, 2007 at 6:45 pmAt the same Georgetown party at Ken Mehlman’s, Mehlman called Bolton “the Atticus Finch of the United Nations.” These guys live in BizarroWorld. Their base is made up of the bad guys in “To Kill A Mockingbird”—-not the good guy!
How come Tom isn’t someone’s b!tch in prison, yet?
November 20th, 2007 at 6:47 pmChallenge him to try, Dr. Krugman. I got your back! No, really, the pleasure will be all mine.
Comment by stewarjt — November 20, 2007 @ 6:45 pm
———————
Couln’t be better said!
November 20th, 2007 at 6:54 pmTom DeLay ?
November 20th, 2007 at 6:56 pmWho is that . . . is he still alive ?
Oh . . . he said something ?
And it’s somehow . . . relevant ?
Nahhh . . . can’t be.
Daryll,
Conservatives ALWAYS want to use violence to solve every problem.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:00 pmTom made a very distasteful comment. I hope he umderstands that he cannot use violence as an answer to wake the democrats up. Jesus said,†hold your peaceâ€. He also said,â€vegeance is mineâ€. Leave it to the Lord. He will fix those who have filthy liberal views.
Comment by Daryll — November 20, 2007 @ 6:58 pm
BAHAHA, this from the religious wingnut that says war is christian? What’s wrong daryll, your boyfriend yell at you for your sinful ways?
Violence, hate, bigotry and ignorance is all you have son, we’re awake, but you’re so asleep and stupid, you don’t realize you’re the moron! How pathetic it is to be you! Almost as pathetic as listening to your ignorant, delusional ramblings!
November 20th, 2007 at 7:01 pmThe Bugman vs. Doc Krugman, film at 11.
Kind of reminds of the film Tombstone. Doc Krugman should challenge The Drunkie Bugman to a spelling contest.
- Tom
November 20th, 2007 at 7:02 pmDaryll,
November 20th, 2007 at 7:03 pmJesus had liberal views. Are you calling him “filthy”?
When is Delay going to jail?
November 20th, 2007 at 7:09 pmI think it was more like - In all things, do to others as you would have them do unto you. This pretty much sums up this administration. They all want to be b!tchslapped.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:16 pm“Tom made a very distasteful comment”. “I hope he understands that”.
So far, so good.
Then you said: “Leave it to the Lord”. “He will fix those who have filthy liberal views”.
Fix, as to how? Not being able to have children?
Are you stupid or what?
November 20th, 2007 at 7:19 pmThe filter must come on after dinner.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:23 pmRejected on tp. that a new one.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:24 pmLeave it to the Lord. He will fix those who have filthy liberal views.
Comment by Daryll — November 20, 2007 @ 6:58 pm
Interesting. My Lord says conservatives are holding back human growth. Maybe we could set up a cage match. My Lord vs Your Lord. Whaddya say Daryll? We could have it on cloud nine. No holds barred.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:28 pmWhy does anyone care what Delay says? He is under indictment isn’t he? He’s out of politics isn’t he? He is a slimy, lying crook and he should not be given an outlet to express his opinion.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:32 pmDaryll wants Jesus to return so he can nail the effeminate, long-haired, creep to another cross.
November 20th, 2007 at 7:32 pmI saw Krugman speak at the Tattered Cover book store a last week. Talk about a bi-otch slapping! He laid the repugs out and fileted them, on the economy, the national debt, the war, morality, etc.
I can see why Tommy Boy doesn’t like him; he calls a spade a f’ing shovel. Krugman rocks!!
November 20th, 2007 at 7:49 pmMy Lord vs Your Lord. Whaddya say Daryll? We could have it on cloud nine. No holds barred.
Comment by Nature Rules — November 20, 2007 @ 7:28 pm
————————-
Yeah, as long as you do not deny Daryl, Daryls’ right to believe in his God. If you do, I’m going to be against you. Do you understand that? Repect for you demands respect for me!
November 20th, 2007 at 7:51 pmwhat you want to bet that Tom is on your t.v. REAL soon talking about how somebody ELSE is acting and being all stern and “Miss Manners” about it?
did we go crazy all at once or did it happen a little at a time?
November 20th, 2007 at 7:53 pmDaryll wants Jesus to return so he can nail the effeminate, long-haired, creep to another cross.
Comment by pete — November 20, 2007 @ 7:32 pm
—————————
Well, that’s your opinion. But anybody who is willing to have himself crucified for his own opininions is worthy of my respect, even if it’s not you’re own
November 20th, 2007 at 8:00 pmI would like Tom DeLay’s indictment to come to the top of the Justice Departments to-do list.
Comment by Clumberfeet
Probably not going to happen as long as the Republiscums are in charge. Hopefully the statute of limitations won’t run out on his crimes by the time the new Democratic President takes office.
November 20th, 2007 at 8:05 pmHey folks, did Daryll finally get banned? I see a lot of posts here answering him, but none by him. Happy days if he is finally gone. He was a particularly disgusting troll. He gave both Christianity and the Republiscums a bad name.
November 20th, 2007 at 8:09 pmHey folks, did Daryll finally get banned? I see a lot of posts here answering him, but none by him. Happy days if he is finally gone. He was a particularly disgusting troll. He gave both Christianity and the Republiscums a bad name.
Comment by bilbobaggins — November 20, 2007 @ 8:09 pm
I’m pretty sure that today’s “Daryll” is not Daryll, as missmolly (I think it was) suggested earlier today. The language is all wrong, and much too mean-spirited. As a rule, for example, Daryll doesn’t direct comments at “Dildoduggins” and the like, and the attribution to Jesus of “vegeance [sic] is mine” just doesn’t ring true. Daryll might even have gotten it right (it’s Paul, not Christ, and he’s referencing the OT, which Daryll tends not to do), although that’s not certain.
I think this is actually a certain sociopath from Virginia, pretending to be Daryll–but many trolls and their sockpuppets are interchangeable, so who knows?
November 20th, 2007 at 8:25 pmComment by foreyes — November 20, 2007 @ 8:00 pm
I save my contempt for certifiable “Psyco-Christians” like the D-troll and Pat Robertson no matter how deluded I think the rest of them are.
November 20th, 2007 at 8:30 pmKrugman is an ECONOMIST, who by telling the TRUTH about the Bush Administration’s tax cuts in the early part of the decade, became
THEIR ENEMY de facto.
Krugman CONTINUES to tell the TRUTH, and so is the enemy of the EVIL which is Delay and the Bush WAR CRIMINALS.
Personally, I’d like to see Delay get his SKULL BASHED IN by a crowbar, but I’m sure his future MASTER Satan will have
“better” things in mind for this EVIL “christian”.
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
November 20th, 2007 at 9:21 pmIn light of Tom’s legal issues, I would say his chance’s of getting “b!tch-slapped” are higher than Krugman’s.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:23 pmAs Olbermann pointed out tonight, in order to b!tch-slap someone, you would have to be the b!tch.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:45 pmPosting test…….being blocked…don’t know why…..
November 20th, 2007 at 9:47 pmI save my contempt for certifiable “Psyco-Christians†like the D-troll and Pat Robertson no matter how deluded I think the rest of them are.
Comment by pete — November 20, 2007 @ 8:30 pm
————–
I couln’t respect you more. But please allow us the rest of us delusional Christians, the benefit of the doubt!
November 20th, 2007 at 10:18 pmhttp://www.crooksandliars.com/
November 20th, 2007 at 10:38 pmread this on Oberman
You people don’t understand. For Tom Delay b!tch-slapping is foreplay.
November 20th, 2007 at 10:39 pmOlbermann!
November 20th, 2007 at 10:39 pmBut please allow us the rest of us delusional Christians, the benefit of the doubt!
Comment by foreyes — November 20, 2007 @ 10:18 pm
That’s why I added the “Psycho” and referred to “them” as “them”. So long as “they” keep it out of my government “they” may believe anything “they” wish. If not? “They” are enemies of reason and liberty and, as such, “they” are my bitter foe. “They” deserve nothing but contempt. If you take an attack on “them” as an insult; it’s a self-inflicted wound.
BTW, the word “creep” is an example of expressions that “they” would use if faced with a living, breathing, Christ. “They” hate pacifists more than I hate “them”. As for “long-haired” and “effeminate”; neither is an epithet in my world and are based on observation of artist’s impressions.
November 20th, 2007 at 11:04 pm“Yeah, as long as you do not deny Daryl, Daryls’ right to believe in his God. If you do, I’m going to be against you. Do you understand that? Repect for you demands respect for me!”
Comment by foreyes
Ask Daryll how much respect he has for atheists, before getting your religious hackles up.
He thinks atheists are destined for Hell, and says so often enough. Since he doesn’t respect my beliefs, why should I respect his (and yours)?
November 20th, 2007 at 11:06 pmOne can always rise to the point of respecting another’s belief’s, even if they don’t respect yours. Which would be difficult.
November 20th, 2007 at 11:33 pmHi BART.
It’s off topic but, here’s a link to that video I mentioned the other night. Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yArPNtiQDcM
November 21st, 2007 at 12:15 amHe thinks atheists are destined for Hell, and says so often enough. Since he doesn’t respect my beliefs, why should I respect his (and yours)?
Comment by barfly — November 20, 2007 @ 11:06 pm
——————–
Because you keep telling everybody that you’re better than anybody else. ARE YOU OR AREN’T YOU?
November 21st, 2007 at 2:32 amDaryll wants Jesus to return so he can nail the effeminate, long-haired, creep to another cross.
Comment by pete — November 20, 2007 @ 7:32 pm
November 21st, 2007 at 3:26 am—————————
That’s a cheap shot. Sorry it had to be you
foreyes, you’ve made several unwarrranted accusations and you’ve jumped to several erroneous conclusions. your militant chritian stance is gaining you no converts, and you really need to be aware of helping to clean your own stall before pointing out everybody else’s problems.
November 21st, 2007 at 8:04 amSeveral unwarrented accussations: What are they?
My militant stance is not for the benefit of anyone. If that’s what it’s all about, I’m a very stupid person. I’m a Christian, should I
November 21st, 2007 at 8:40 amapologize? If so, please tell me and I will.
#66 - “He also said,â€vegeance is mineâ€. Leave it to the Lord. He will fix those who have filthy liberal views.” Comment by Daryll — November 20, 2007 @ 6:58 pm
There you go again, telling God how he should act based on your pick & choose approach to the Bible.
If you were true to your faith, and actually read the Bible, God would “fix those who refuse to help the downtrodden and are unable to turn the other cheek”.
One can only assume that you will be surprised when the GOP and the neo-cons are sent to hell for their transgessions against the word of God. Unless you end up with them for failing to practice what Jesus preached, and for following your pick & choose style of faith.
I’ll keep you in my prayers, Daryll. You obviously need God to help you correct your partisan mis-perceptions.
November 21st, 2007 at 8:59 amLeave it to the Lord. He will fix those who have filthy liberal views.
Comment by Daryll — November 20, 2007 @ 6:58 pm
Like his son Jesus?
November 21st, 2007 at 9:21 am“B*tch slap” What a thug. He could show a little refinement and use careful words like “pummel” or “knock about”… just classless.
November 21st, 2007 at 9:23 amfirst off, I don’t have time to goof off at work like most people here,apparently.
Comment by whiteyfresh — November 20, 2007 @ 5:16 pm
The French Fry deep fryer does need your undivided attention
November 21st, 2007 at 9:27 amB*tch slap? How Jeff Gannon of you!
Not exactly what a “man” would say…
November 21st, 2007 at 9:56 amPaul Krugman stood his ground against Jesse Ventura with Ventura SITTING RIGHT NEXT TO HIM.
The man has more balls than delay.
November 21st, 2007 at 10:01 am“He gave both Christianity and the Republiscums a bad name.”
Daryll gave other people named “Daryll” a bad name. Daryll gave people a bad name. Daryll gave biological life a bad name. Daryll gave baryonic matter a bad name.
November 21st, 2007 at 11:36 amThat’s a cheap shot. Sorry it had to be you
Comment by foreyes — November 21, 2007 @ 3:26 am
No. It’s a direct frontal assault on a particularly offensive troll.
November 21st, 2007 at 11:47 am