Will that “Liberal” media pick up on this and show how we were lied to?

No, you say, mmm, thought so.

Will the Democratic congress investigators pick up on this and show how we were lied to?

No, you say, mmm, thought so.

Will progress blogs be the only place this news will show up?

Of course, you say, mmm, thought so.

Bush/Cheney
Hague Trials ‘09

Buck Fush

I have no doubt that he has the blessing of the White House (What a misnomer with those dark, evil characters in there). He simply claims he had no idea…he will sell some books, and it will all blow over, as did the Tenet book, and the others that basically said the same thing.

These people feel they can do ANYTHING with inpunity because they are who they are…and thus far, no one has REALLY challenged them, not even Fitzgerald, in my opinion. My only hope is that the World Court will get them for CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

“Everything the right-wing does is designed to accomplish one of two things, either:
(a) transfer wealth from everyone else to the rich, or,
(b) distract everyone else from the fact that (a) is occurring.”

~Jack Clark (The Rational Radical)

McClellan was indeed the DISTRACTOR…as was/is Fox News; Snow, Perino; Limbaugh, et al.

Oh, wait…you meant the OTHER Deep Throat…

I sure Mr Bush and everyone else involved will get a new reprimand written into some report issued by some congressional committee. Yep, we’re talking real justice for the treasonous activity of outing a convert agent. Yep, a really long reprimand too.

See, there really are consequence for acts of treason even if you’re a Republican.

“… and it only took me a couple years to screw up my righteousness and my indignation at being so used enough to stop lying for them and leave….”

“Buy my book, please. I’m willing to do anything, screw anyone, for money. My ‘morals’ are entirely of the pecuniary sort.”

Cheers,

Summon this dude before Congress now, under the banner of impeachment hearings if necessary.

I might remind you all that impeachment requires only a majority vote of the House (removal is then discussed by the Senate), and it is possible to impeach a President several times.

I am extremely pleasantly surprised that someone is starting to break ranks and tell the full story. Let us hope that this is like a snowball rolling down a hill.

Comment by dwstar — November 20, 2007 @ 11:40 am

Nixon was paranoid and vicious, but he had more brains in his thumb than the entire Bush administration can claim. I hated the man’s guts while he was in office, but in retrospect some of his foreign and domestic policy decisions were positively “liberal”, particularly when compared to the Republicans who have followed him into the White House.

It creeps me out to think that I have any nostalgia at all for the Nixon years; just goes to show how things have deteriorated.

Q Do you think that the Justice Department can conduct an impartial investigation, considering the political ramifications of the CIA leak, and why wouldn’t a special counsel be better?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Let me just say something about leaks in Washington. There are too many leaks of classified information in Washington. There’s leaks at the executive branch; there’s leaks in the legislative branch. There’s just too many leaks. And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of.

And so I welcome the investigation. I — I’m absolutely confident that the Justice Department will do a very good job. There’s a special division of career Justice Department officials who are tasked with doing this kind of work; they have done this kind of work before in Washington this year. I have told our administration, people in my administration to be fully cooperative.

I want to know the truth. If anybody has got any information inside our administration or outside our administration, it would be helpful if they came forward with the information so we can find out whether or not these allegations are true and get on about the business.

Yes, let’s see, Kemper — he’s from Chicago. Where are you? Are you a Cubs or White Sox fan? (Laughter.) Wait a minute. That doesn’t seem fair, does it? (Laughter.)

Q Yesterday we were told that Karl Rove had no role in it —

THE PRESIDENT: Yes.

Q — have you talked to Karl and do you have confidence in him —

THE PRESIDENT: Listen, I know of nobody — I don’t know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified information. If somebody did leak classified information, I’d like to know it, and we’ll take the appropriate action. And this investigation is a good thing.

And again I repeat, you know, Washington is a town where there’s all kinds of allegations. You’ve heard much of the allegations. And if people have got solid information, please come forward with it. And that would be people inside the information who are the so-called anonymous sources, or people outside the information — outside the administration. And we can clarify this thing very quickly if people who have got solid evidence would come forward and speak out. And I would hope they would.

And then we’ll get to the bottom of this and move on. But I want to tell you something — leaks of classified information are a bad thing. And we’ve had them — there’s too much leaking in Washington. That’s just the way it is. And we’ve had leaks out of the administrative branch, had leaks out of the legislative branch, and out of the executive branch and the legislative branch, and I’ve spoken out consistently against them and I want to know who the leakers are.