Comment by cold_hard_left — November 28, 2007 @ 12:20 pm

That’s it? That’s all y8ou have? Treason in the White House, and you excuse it this weakly? Are you a citizen of Saudi Arabia, or another of our enemies?

Comment by Veritas — November 28, 2007 @ 1:11 pm

I have had those thoughts too but ended up thinking that it had
to be something outrageous that basically no members of Congress
as a whole, wanted to come out in the open.
Maybe information that would be uncovered in say . . a real
investigation into 911. I mean, that may sound a little far fetched
but I have a hard time believing that congress was just ‘faked-out’
by the mis-information and lies before voting for military action in
Iraq.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Pollard

BTW: remember Jonathan Pollard and Bill Clinton’s best buddy Marc Rich

fox news israeli spying documentary
Ask Fox News: How extensive is Israeli spying in America?

Watch these Carl Cameron documentaries

Fox Documentary Part I “Zoom Copters”
Fox Documentary Part II “Infliltration of Phone System”
Fox Documentary Part III “Comverse Inc … Israeli wiretapping”
Fox Documentary Part IV “200 Israelis Arrested…drug ring busted…Amdocs”

Israeli Co Is New Pentagon Computer Security Supplier!

The Israeli company for computer security Check Points has been appointed as the official supplier to the American Ministry of Defense. In particular, the company will supply American Federal agencies with a protection system for data stored on laptop computers.

This footage has been removed from the Fox News website.

But you can find the short broadcasts on links at http://www.YellowCakeWalk.net

Comment by Veritas

This is the one thought I consider when my anger for this administration grows to a fever pitch. It is the last refuge my brain can go to when I need to ‘chill out’ after visiting the daily blogs.

Thanks for reminding me that there is hope, after all.

Why do you think they illegally wiretapped individuals for whom a “warrant” would probably be denied?? Three guesses and the first two don’t count.

If manipulating intelligence and repeatedly flat out lying to get
support for their war of choice is not enough to impeach and
imprison these ba$tards you can forget about anything
touching them.

Unless of course a gutsy citizen . . . .

I encourage everyone to read the full article from the WSJ – its even funnier than TP’s synopsis.

This entire administration is outside the law and NO ONE is going to do anything about it. I just hope that there is enough left in 50 years when we actually have the will to investigate.

Bush/Cheney ‘09 at the Hague? I wish!

Well, even so, nothing will happen anyway. And, there is always a pardon for criminals at the end of the day.

All BUSH-IT again!!!

Comment by cold_hard_left

Since when does your king follow ANY law or policy? He said he was the decider, didn’t he?

Comment by cold_hard_left — November 28, 2007 @ 12:37 pm

Yes, and Mr Bloch was Bush’s CHOICE for the job. Gee, ya think Georgie would pick someone who might actually challenge him? NOT!!!

Comment by cold_hard_left — November 28, 2007 @ 12:20 pm

And your comment is intentionally ambiguous. The posters above did not assume that. Bush did nominate Mr Bloch for his current postion.

The Honorable Scott J. Bloch
Special Counsel

On June 26, 2003, President George W. Bush nominated Scott J. Bloch for the position of Special Counsel at the U.S. Office of Special Counsel. The U.S. Senate unanimously confirmed Mr. Bloch on December 9, 2003. On January 5, 2004, he was sworn in to serve a five-year term.

This is straight from the Office Of Special Counsel’s website, BTW.

Bush may not be able to fire the guy, but he most certainly has MAJOR say in who gets the job.

Bush/Cheney
Hague Trials ‘09

Buck Fush

“Effective immediately, you are not permitted to destroy any computer files on White House computers, no matter how much the client insists you do so…”

Comment by PatrioticLiberalChristian — November 28, 2007 @ 11:35 am

Yup.