Hostages at Clinton campaign office reportedly free.
By on Nov 30th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Hostages at Clinton campaign office reportedly free.
“Several news organizations are reporting that two volunteers who were held hostage are now free.” Though it is “unclear if there were any more inside,” police on the scene told Fox News that “you could deduce that all the hostages are gone.” People are now reportedly negotiating the hostage taker’s surrender.
UPDATE: “Local police are believed to be negotiating with a man described as a well-known local resident with a history of emotional problems who told his son to ‘watch the news today.’”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
What? Just like that?
Where is all the fire and bombs and superdextrous cops jumping to avoid bullets while shooting at the bad guy’s forehead? I mean there has to be a happy ending, right?
November 30th, 2007 at 3:47 pmTroll claiming this is a Hillary plant for publicity in …3…2…1…
November 30th, 2007 at 3:48 pmGiuliani was upset upon hearing the news. Apparently he had a deal with Ahmadinejad that the hostages wouldn’t be released until after the election.
November 30th, 2007 at 3:51 pmJuan, you need to lay off the Hot Fuzz.
November 30th, 2007 at 3:52 pmTime to bring back the Fox News “business poll” and ask the question:
November 30th, 2007 at 3:53 pm“Do you think its the right thing to bomb Hillary’s headquarters in NH?”
Back at ya Juan C and Missmolly……This is our Friday suprise, compliment’s of the Grand Old Pervert’s….Nothing else going on or they want a diversion while they sell out our air port’s and raid our pocket’s as usual….LOL.Yah know he can’t be a dem..Poor bad guy….LOL…Blessings
November 30th, 2007 at 3:53 pmYeah, no ones hurt. Now go check his computer and see where he visits on ReichWing Hate sites.
News Headline – Jake D. a impostor claiming to be a retired lawyer and korean war veteran was taken by police at a NH Clinton Campaign Headquarters today. There were stacks RNC pay sheets that paid him per post next to his computer.
Buck Fush
November 30th, 2007 at 3:54 pm#7.Good one..
November 30th, 2007 at 3:55 pmJuan, you need to lay off the Hot Fuzz.
Comment by gummitch
I just got back from the center of Mexico City, the Zócalo, a very popular place. I took the subway in order to get there faster. And there was this little girl, 14 y/o crawling inside the wagon, maybe looking for some dropped coins. Her clothes were dirty and I couldn’t see her face. The door opened at the next station and she got out still crawling. She wasn’t asking for money like most of beggars tend to do. She was just crawling…
The saddest thing I’ve ever seen in a long time, but somehow I’m getting used to that. My ability to be shocked has plummeted. Like when you see at the news some dead guy or a broadcast war. No sensitivity at all.
November 30th, 2007 at 3:57 pmI’m pleased no one was hurt.
I’m not pleased that Fox is the only reference used.
TP, couldn’t you use AP or Reuters or…
November 30th, 2007 at 3:57 pmThe guy was sent by Cheneeeeyyy’s office….
November 30th, 2007 at 3:59 pmHill’reh lags behind Obama by 2 points in Iowa, and latest poll has Clinton lead in New Hampshire down to 7 from 20+ just weeks ago:
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/FOX_NH_2008_release113007_web.pdf
November 30th, 2007 at 4:02 pmPiping hot Talking Point:
Clinton Did It!
November 30th, 2007 at 4:03 pmWow Jason, that was pretty quick getting back to your computer.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:03 pmA guy with a bomb duct-taped to his chest? Does this count as a terrorist attack? On U.S. soil?
Not unless the man is Muslim, I guess…
November 30th, 2007 at 4:04 pmor jewish… cultural ignorance…
November 30th, 2007 at 4:09 pmand, we are one freaked out people…
another chicago train story:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3477136,00.html
#15, For Truth,
Not sure what you mean by that, but I do wonder whether this is a stunt by Hill’reh to disrupt her diving poll numbers.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:12 pmSharon!!! Blessings…
November 30th, 2007 at 4:13 pmJason ManHandler is back!
Maybe you could weigh in on missmolly’s question…this does mean a terrorist attack on our soil, right?
Where’s Shirtoff and DHS? Let me guess, at an AIPAC meeting, supporting Israel’s insistence the US back off any peace deal, right?
Where’s your Bush? Crawford or Condi’s?
Where’s Cheney? Putting in new batteries for the Holidays?
ManHandler, your turn…
November 30th, 2007 at 4:13 pma well-known local resident with a history of emotional problems who told his son to ‘watch the news today.’â€
Ok. Now my money goes to Bigfoot.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:14 pm“Local police are believed to be negotiating with a man described as a well-known local resident with a history of emotional problems who told his son to ‘watch the news today.’â€
Great… The son has a wacko for a dad.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:16 pm#20…it isn’t considered a terrorist attack unless a teddybear is beheaded or cheese is smuggled onto an airplane. I’m sure Michael Shirkoff will be on teevee shortly to tell us that this is unrelated to terrorism.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:18 pmThey would have called for help from the campaign office but the Republicans here in NH have this thing about phone jamming.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:23 pmMenehune,
How about a teddy bear named Muhammad, stuffed with cheese, and missing in Aruba?
God, I hate those teddy bear terrorists!
November 30th, 2007 at 4:24 pmWBZ TV here is saying that only one hostage was released and that 2 more remain.
Fox “News”? Consider the source, dude.
We’re hearing that it’s someone’s stepfather who had asked last night for road flares.
So that’s my guess about what he has strapped to his chest.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:24 pmLOL – I can tell you libs have a lot of pent up frustration to hurl at any non-lib that posts, so have at. I would have thought you would be happy with Obama and Edwards SURGING – your favorite word.
Or maybe you are upset that even John Murtha has finally admitted that the surge is working, and Al Quieda is now re-focusing their efforts towards Afghanistan and Pakistan, having lost after making their central front of their war in Iraq.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314203,00.html
” … new remarks by Democratic Rep. John Murtha who said, “I think the surge is working.”
Go on, get it out of your system – start spewing.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:24 pma well-known local resident with a history of emotional problems who told his son to ‘watch the news today.’
Well, we know already from the VTech shooting that emotionally disturbed people who do things are not considered terrorists if they commit their acts in the U.S.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:27 pmJason H Manhandler the Turd has spoken. (shhhh…)
November 30th, 2007 at 4:27 pmComment by Jason M. Hendler — November 30, 2007 @ 4:24 pm
I am a little confused. Just when did AQ make Iraq its central front? They weren’t even there till we got things going. Guerilla style attacks on western nations is their central front.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:29 pmWhy, oh why are the Kurds cutting their own oil deals?
How is it that the central gummint in Baghdad doesn’t even know about it?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/iraq/2004043727_iraqoil30.html
Coupla key quotes:
“The Kurdish regional government’s oil deals with foreign companies drew sharp criticism Thursday in the Iraqi parliament, with some lawmakers saying the contracts set a dangerous precedent and threatened efforts to push through U.S.-backed legislation aimed at promoting national unity.”
Kurdistan’s leaders have signed an exploration deal with Hunt Oil of Texas and others with European companies.
Abdul-Lateef complained that the central government in Baghdad has no control over the Kurdistan region, which has enjoyed broad autonomy since 1991.
“According to what is going on, it seems that those people do not belong to Iraq,” he said of the Kurds.
I’m so glad the surge was so successful that the Iraqis are taking full advantage of it to, … what?
November 30th, 2007 at 4:29 pmAnd there was the guy right after 9/11 who slit the bus driver’s throat and tried to wreck the bus–that too was “unrelated to terrorism” because the perp was “emotionally disturbed”.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:29 pmEven though Jason was warned that we were waiting for the first idiot to say something stupid he just couldn’t help himself. Jason you really need to get some impulse control. We really don’t need to see what an idiot you are every few days. We remember that kind of dumb for a long time.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:29 pmHey Hill Billy even for you this is a stupid comment.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:33 pmWaiting for this ‘Lee Harvey Oswald’ to die in police custody.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:34 pmThe Ridge/Chertoff principle is: If the subject manages to commit their act whithin the United States, they are not a terrorist, but if they are caught prior to committing their act they are a terrorist. It is all very simple.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:34 pmIt’s Friday, Friday, Friday!
Have a great weekend, TPers. Here in MN we’re expecting 5-9″ of new snow with sub-zero temps. Brrrrrrr!
November 30th, 2007 at 4:37 pmJust when did AQ make Iraq its central front?
Comment by dbadass
You and your obnoxious facts. :)
November 30th, 2007 at 4:38 pm#32, dbigass,
You know that AQ’s #1 priority was trying to stop the emerging democracy in Iraq, to the neglect of all their other efforts. Now that their efforts have been suppressed in Iraq, they are now causing more problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where they will lose their support, as they did in Iraq, by causing too much violence and suffering, with no change in government.
What I can’t understand, with things now going well in Iraq, why isn’t Hill’reh doing better in the polls?
November 30th, 2007 at 4:39 pmComment by Jason M. Hendler — November 30, 2007 @ 4:39 pm
It is pronounced just like it is spelled dbadass. I don’t buy your premise no matter how much you wish to state it as fact. Why should anyone? Sure it is nice that things are finally starting to improve. What is your point? It still doesn’t make it a wise foreign policy decision. I can’t figure out how you are trying to pronounce that either but her name is spelled Hillary. Maybe it is because she is not the candidate of choice for many of us
November 30th, 2007 at 4:45 pmwas trying to stop the emerging democracy in Iraq,
Seems like occupying the country when 83% of the people want us out would be a good job of stopping democracy…
And what a hoot, that Bushy and Maliki, without the advise or consent of their legislative branches, decreed that the US and Iraq will have an “enduring” relationship.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:46 pmUntil the oil’s gone…
Jason,
November 30th, 2007 at 4:46 pmDid you make all that senseless drivel up by yourself, or did you just copy it from the daily Republican talking points memo?
Hey Jason, who’se your candidate”?
November 30th, 2007 at 4:46 pmThe surge is completing only the military portion. Without a political solution there won’t be any lasting peace. The surge is just securing areas that have largely been ethnically cleansed already. As long as Al Sadr has a cease fire in place the violence will go down.
It’s been going on 4 1/2 years now, I would hope we could qwell a 3rd world army and some “dead enders” by now.
Jason forgets the significant bumbling and f#@k ups the Bush administration has done so far. He wants to ignore the large reasons why there was the insurgent “surge” in the first place. He forgets L. Paul Brehmer and Rumsfeld. He forgets the billions lost in no bid contracts and the firing of the entire Iraqi military.
The “success” of the surge doesn’t absolve this administration.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:47 pmHey Jason, who’se your candidate�
Comment by RUCerious
Bush, of course.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:47 pmComment by Billy Hill — November 30, 2007 @ 4:43 pm
Rochester probably would be right up your alley. Those of us who live in NH find it to be a pretty sorry ass white trash burb
November 30th, 2007 at 4:48 pmAQ’s number one priority was to recapture Spain. Look it up outside the rightwing newz.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:49 pmWhy does Jason ManHandler seem to think that poorly-spelled taunts directed at Hillary Clinton will rile progressives?
Could it be that, cursed with a mind that only sees black or white, he imagines that, because he hates Hillary, we naturally love her?
How sad it must be to have such a limited range of vision, and of imagination. But at least it’s not wasted on one with intelligence.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:49 pmWho Would The World Elect for
the President of the United States?
http://www.whowouldtheworldelect.com/
Ron Paul Total Votes:40,094
Barack Obama Total Votes:15,192
Dennis Kucinich Total Votes:7,649
Hillary Clinton Total Votes:3,938
Votes for the Democratic party: 31,368
Votes for the Republican party: 45,163
Check it out ,
November 30th, 2007 at 4:50 pmTroy Stanley, known as the blogger Age of Rifles, finally binged his ass into jail, after drunkenly mistaking road flares for bombs, strapped them to his torso with duct tape and held a few Clinton campaign workers hostage.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:50 pmThe abduction ended with Troy passing out while muttering something about chickenhawk chairborne rangers…
“Just when did AQ make Iraq its central front?”
Ayman al-Zawahiri
Realities of the Conflict Between Islam and Unbelief
Speech released by as-Sahab Media
December 2006
“I repeat what I mentioned previously: the backing of the Jihad in Afghanistan and Iraq today is to back the most important battlefields in which the Crusade against Islam and Muslims is in progress. And the defeat of the Crusaders there — soon, Allah permitting — will have a far-reaching effect on the future of the Muslim Ummah, Allah willing.”
November 30th, 2007 at 4:50 pmTroll claiming this is a Hillary plant for publicity in …3…2…1…
Comment by missmolly — November 30, 2007 @ 3:48 pm
Not sure what you mean by that, but I do wonder whether this is a stunt by Hill’reh to disrupt her diving poll numbers.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — November 30, 2007 @ 4:12 pm
DING! DING! DING! We have a winner!
November 30th, 2007 at 4:51 pmAnd BCU finally exposes itself as an RNC operative.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:51 pm“Just when did AQ make Iraq its central front?â€
Osama bin Laden
To the Muslims in Iraq in Particular and the [Islamic] Nation in General
Audio Message Posted on Jihadist Web Sites
Dec. 28, 2004
I now address my speech to the whole of the Islamic nation: Listen and understand. The issue is big and the misfortune is momentous. The most important and serious issue today for the whole world is this Third World War, which the Crusader-Zionist coalition began against the Islamic nation. It is raging in the land of the two rivers [Iraq]. The world’s millstone and pillar is in Baghdad, the capital of the caliphate…
November 30th, 2007 at 4:51 pm#47, RUBiCurious,
If I had to tolerate a Democrat in the White House, then I would choose Joe Biden. He is far and away the best presidential prospect in the Dem primary race.
Sadly, I am not seeing any candidates with an eye for the future, in the mold of Teddy Roosevelt, etc., who lead large public works efforts in the past (Hoover Dam, Panama Canal, cross-continental railroad, interstate highway system, etc.).
Fortunately, venture capital(ism) is leading the way in the development of clean, renewable energy sources, and again, fortunately, it will be those venture capitalists who will profit from it.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:53 pmI see, Exley. So what you’re saying is that AQ made Iraq its central front three and a half years AFTER we invaded, and that it wasn’t their central front UNTIL we invaded?
Excellent. Thanks for that.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:54 pmHere in MN we’re expecting 5-9″ of new snow with sub-zero temps. Brrrrrrr!
Comment by Zimzone — November 30, 2007 @ 4:37 pm
And here in North Carolina we’re in the high 50’s and dry as a bone. I’ll even take some snow to help our drought problem — care to send some down?
November 30th, 2007 at 4:55 pmComment by Exley — November 30, 2007
I think you are failing to put this comment in a temporal context as in after we invaded a sovereign nation and gave AQ a cause in Iraq. No invasion, no alledged central front. See how that works?
November 30th, 2007 at 4:55 pmExley, curiously all those statements are AFTER 2003 invasion.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:56 pmRochester probably would be right up your alley. Those of us who live in NH find it to be a pretty sorry ass white trash burb
Comment by dbadass — November 30, 2007 @ 4:48 pm
Ironic db, the town with the Lilac Parade near me has the same demographic. Let that be a red flag to anybody buying a house. Funnier though is that Hillbilly thinks we believe he has friends.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:56 pmRalph,
I don’t think anyone is making the contention — I know I am not — that Iraq was the central front before Saddam was deposed. Regardless, according to the Al Qaeda leadership’s own words — Iraq and Afghanistan are indeed the central fronts in the war on terrorism.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:56 pmExley,
So good to see your posts again – don’t bother libs with facts, they will remain in denial, even when presented with the facts.
I can’t believe Murtha finally admitted that the SURGE is working. I don’t think that they know which way to shift, considering Hill’reh isn’t benefitting from her correct position in supporting the Iraq War.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:57 pmGood point Ralph. Is there anybody here who is a supporter of Hillary? If there is one of you would you please speak up so Jason, for the first time ever, can accomplish something.
November 30th, 2007 at 4:58 pmZim, I get out of the house tomorrow early AM to go teach programming and get to drive in the first snow of the year!
November 30th, 2007 at 4:59 pmJuan,
As I said to Ralph, that may be true. But dbadass’s question was “when did AQ declare Iraq the central front.” As we see, it was in 2004, at the latest.
You can certainly make the argument that Iraq would NOT have been a central front in the war with Al Qaeda had we not deposed Saddam. But the fact is that Al Qaeda is there now and today believes that success in Iraq is crucial to its survival and mission. We need to fight AQ where ever it turns up — Afghanistan, Iraq, the Philippines, Ethiopia, etc.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:00 pmJason, Ex-lax… time to get room, you two.
This isn’t a REPUBLICAN website, ya know…
November 30th, 2007 at 5:01 pm#66, Exley,
LMAOROTFL! Again, you are expending to much reason on these libs – they don’t want to understand.
AQ was running around the world, terrorizing various countries, when the US decided to clean house in Afghanistan and Iraq. Realizing that the greatest threat to their way of life is freedom and democracy, AQ decided to undermine democratic efforts in these two countries – and THEY LOST. AQ’s main front now is Pakistan, with Afghanistan a close second.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:01 pmAl Qaeda is there now
Then why on earth did the General in charge of the area north of Baghdad, just a month ago say that he could count the number of AQ fighters he’s encountered in the last three months on one hand??????
November 30th, 2007 at 5:02 pmAnother nutjob that went off his meds. RU…you able to blog AND hold off the Swat guys simultaneously? Impressive.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:02 pmComment by Exley — November 30, 2007 @
So if I follow your logic, we should start stuff so that they show up so that we can fight them whereever they show up. Am I following you correctly?
November 30th, 2007 at 5:02 pmAQ was running around the world, terrorizing various countries, when the US decided to clean house in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Typical troll stupidity again. AQ wasn’t in Iraq, so why clean house there?
November 30th, 2007 at 5:03 pm“hostage situation in N.H. Clinton HQ: hostage taker is troy Stanley. He was on a 3-day drinkin binge;”
Well, it is Friday night, so it is time for me to start a three-day drinking binge of my own!
Have a good weekend everyone.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:04 pmLooks like I rubbed a raw nerve on AoR! You slovenly twit!
November 30th, 2007 at 5:04 pmFor the last two years reich-wingers have claimed Murtha is anti-American, a terrorist, a liar, anti-military, etc. Jebus, can’t you reich-wingers keep your talking points straight any longer?
Opposite of the way the lib queens started treating their VP candidate Lieberman when he expressed support for the war effort; pariah overnight because of one issue.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:05 pmAl Qaeda is there now
Then why on earth did the General in charge of the area north of Baghdad, just a month ago say that he could count the number of AQ fighters he’s encountered in the last three months on one hand??????
Comment by RUCerious — November 30, 2007 @ 5:02 pm
Shhhh, Exlax and Jason are busy bonding, yes that’s a euphemism for man on man sex among Republicans.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:05 pm“I can’t believe Murtha finally admitted that the SURGE is working.”
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — November 30, 2007 @ 4:57 pm
Go ahead and believe it — Murtha did actually say that. And Republicans have grabbed that ball and are running with it. But if you’re going to quote Murtha, you might as well get the full context of what he said, so don’t ignore this part:
“The military surge has created a window of opportunity for the Iraqi government,†the Pennsylvania Democrat said. “Unfortunately, the sacrifice of our troops has not been met by the Iraqi government and they have failed to capitalize on the political and diplomatic steps that the surge was designed to provide.”
In other words, we’ve done our part. We’ve created that “window” for the Iraqis. However, we’re still not getting the results we were supposed to. This isn’t really all that different from what other Democrats are saying. And no — I have no desire to see the surge fail, since our people have already died to make it a success. It’s just that the political situation in Iraq is so bad that I remain skeptical.
As far as Hillary goes, she will just continue to play her little game of dodge-ball. That will work with some voters and disenchant others.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:06 pmThat is why I was wondering why Hillary had a big campaign headquarters there????? I would have chosen Gonic myself.
Comment by Billy Hill — November 30, 2007 @ 5:00 pm
If you do a little more research you will find that campaigns put headquarters in larger population areas. Being a small state with few if any locales which might be considered cities. Rochester is a logical spot. I think you probably are smart enough to figure that out but I realize that the need to work your Hillary issues out supercedes thought sometimes
November 30th, 2007 at 5:06 pmLooks like I rubbed a raw nerve on AoR! You slovenly twit!
Comment by RUCerious — November 30, 2007 @ 5:04 pm
The only thing you rub is your boy toy, gator bait.
Get back to work, boy, Cinnabon pays you good money to clean those floors!
November 30th, 2007 at 5:07 pmAnother nutjob that went off his meds. RU…you able to blog AND hold off the Swat guys simultaneously? Impressive.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:02 pm
Proof that there are only a couple of trolls with many names. Mention their name and poof … they show up immediately.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:07 pmExley,
Have a good weekend, thanks for providing the requisite quotes for the libs to chew on. I understood it was there way to say AQ wasn’t there before, yada, yada, yada, but they dont’ understand the significance of the power of freedom / democracy to reduce the causes of extremism, which is why AQ fights it all so hard.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:07 pmAs I said to Ralph, that may be true.
It has even denied by CIA and the 9/11 Comission Report (our new source for sublimating human bodies).
That was one of the excuses in the rationale for war. And now you say otherwise when you were fighting so hard months ago to prove that there was indeed a connection between Saddam/Al-Qaeda.
Man, you must feel stupid.
We don’t have enough troops to keep Iraq safe,
Comment by Dr. Matt
Make that Baghdad…err…no, just the Green Zone.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:07 pmWe need to fight AQ where ever it turns up — Afghanistan, Iraq, the Philippines, Ethiopia, etc.
Comment by Exley
Forgot to mention Saudi Arabia where most of the money for AlQaeda comes. And don’t use we, when you are not going to enlist. Please.
Circles. round and round. There was no opertational AQ in Iraq prior to our invasion. None. Exley’s and JH are connecting dots that didn’t exist and then claim we have to be there now because they are there. AQ is in Pakistan in the largest numbers but we have no full force hunting them down there. Afghanistan is turning into Bushfukdupistan with the Taliban and AQ reforming but we have no plans to place a “surge” there.
Quit trumpeting military without understanding it.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:09 pmWinston Churchill, as responsible cabinet minister in the early years, saw Iraq as an experiment in high-technology colonial control. Though officials in London sometimes had qualms about the violence, colonial administrators on the ground like Gertrude Bell expressed enthusiasm for the power of the imperial military enterprise.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It seems Exley, and Jason and the other corruption supporters are trying of obfuscate the fact that the hostage taking nut will be found to be a GOP supporter as well.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:10 pmThe only thing you rub is your boy toy, gator bait.
Get back to work, boy, Cinnabon pays you good money to clean those floors!
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
Sorry but RU isn’t a Republican. He doesn’t have a boy toy. When he wants one though he’ll call you, don’t be jealous.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:11 pmHow about the GOP? You guys aided and abetted them for years, and the current AG protected the CIA Agent responsible for much of their operations. How about we waterboard (kidding) you, terrorist sympathizer?
Comment by republicans hate facts — November 30, 2007 @ 5:04 pm
RHF, please don’t bother the trolls with facts, you’re expending too much reason on them as it is.
The fact that Republican support for bin Laden over the past twenty-five years gave rise to AQ only means that we should now listen to Republican plans on how to fight them. Just like we needed to listen to GWB, the guy who drove us INTO the ditch in Iraq, to get us out. Makes perfect sense, if you don’t think about it too hard. Or at all.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:11 pmAQ was not in Iraq prior to herr dubyah’s invasion.
Hear that, Jason? AQ was d@mn near everywhere else in the middle east EXCEPT in the country of a guy who had a pathological hatred for the U.S.
Always remember: you can try to reason with a lib, you can also try to reason with a tree for all the good it will do.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:12 pmWhen he wants one though he’ll call you, don’t be jealous.
Comment by Shayne
ROTFL!!!
November 30th, 2007 at 5:12 pmDamn, this troll has really damaged my stupidtrollmeter…
November 30th, 2007 at 5:13 pmBREAK OUT THE SUPER SOAKERS!!!
Comment by Billy Hill — November 30, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
Put it back in your pants little boy, nobody wants to see something that small.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:13 pmSorry but RU isn’t a Republican. He doesn’t have a boy toy. When he wants one though he’ll call you, don’t be jealous.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:11 pm
You seem to know a lot about him….why is that? No, don’t tell me, I don’t really want to know. Dolt.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:14 pmHendler is under the illusion that democracy will sprout in Iraq.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:14 pmRegardless, according to the Al Qaeda leadership’s own words — Iraq and Afghanistan are indeed the central fronts in the war on terrorism.
So the trolls admit America is the terrorist here? AQ is fighting terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan?
they finally have gotten something right. congrats, Exlax and jason Hitler.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:15 pmIt’s beginning to smell like urine in here…
Another “Pee” stained thread.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:15 pmDamn, this troll has really damaged my stupidtrollmeter…
Comment by Juan C. — November 30, 2007 @ 5:13 pm
I hear they haven’t invented the meter that can deal with that level of stupid. Maybe in a few years they’ll come up with one that starts at moron and works it’s way down to the stupid of our trolls.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:16 pmDamn, this troll has really damaged my stupidtrollmeter…
Comment by Juan C. — November 30, 2007 @ 5:13 pm
Which one? Hillbilly or AoR?
I don’t mean to leave out Jason ManHandler, but in my judgment he’s well within the range of most industrial-grade stupidtrollmeters. He’s kind of what they were built to measure. Hillbilly, on the other hand, there’s a whole ‘nother level of stupid.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:17 pmAfghanistan is turning into Bushfukdupistan with the Taliban and AQ reforming but we have no plans to place a “surge†there.
Haven’t you heard? A surge wouldn’t work anyway because the war is already lost and to believe otherwise to willingly suspend disbelief because our enemy is akin to the Minutemen and they will win and the war is already lost.
Ugh…this Edwards-style channeling gives me a headache.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:17 pmYou seem to know a lot about him….why is that? No, don’t tell me, I don’t really want to know. Dolt.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:14 pm
As a woman I have good gaydar and he’s not the one throwing off signals if you catch my drift, Nancy.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:17 pmHendler is under the illusion that democracy will sprout in Iraq.
Comment by hellinabucket — November 30, 2007 @ 5:14 pm
Uh, Hendler is under the DELUSION that he has an effing clue.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:18 pmProof that there are only a couple of trolls with many names. Mention their name and poof … they show up immediately.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
Sort of like rubbing a genie’s lamp, but your wish that they go away isn’t granted.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:19 pmUgh…this Edwards-style channeling gives me a headache.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:17 pm
Naw, that’s just what the rest of us call “thinking”. You’re just not that good at it yet.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:19 pmAs a woman I have good gaydar and he’s not the one throwing off signals if you catch my drift, Nancy.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:17 pm
A woman with Gaydar…come on, is that even possible?
November 30th, 2007 at 5:20 pmUgh…this Edwards-style channeling gives me a headache.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:17 pm
If your channeling Edwards maybe you could go get a job. Somebody needs to hose down your mom’s basement.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:21 pmA woman with Gaydar…come on, is that even possible?
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Another topic you know nothing about. It is just scary how little you know.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:22 pmNaw, that’s just what the rest of us call “thinkingâ€. You’re just not that good at it yet.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — November 30, 2007 @ 5:19 pm
I see…so this “thinking” that you refer to consists of liberals gladhanding one another in an attempt to create a virtual New Jersey truckstop? I see, I see. I better contact admin about this.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:23 pmHaven’t you heard AoR, you have your head stuck in a Bush. Afhganistan is a central front and was a justifiable military action. Rumsfeld said there were no good targets in Afghanistan, they were all in Iraq. That got us this far. Why don’t you just get in the back seat and let the sober people drive this country. We’ve been letting the likes of you wander in the desert without a road map for too long.
The only thing giving you a headache is the constant drumming of fear you hear from this administration.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:23 pmComment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:12 pm
This seems sort of a silly statement. Is AQ in Cuba, Venezuela, or anywhere else that there are governments opposed to the US.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:24 pmAnother topic you know nothing about. It is just scary how little you know.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:22 pm
Guilty as charged. I’ll leave the Gaydar to you and the rest of the liberal ladies here at TP. Hear that RU?
November 30th, 2007 at 5:24 pmIt is just scary how little you know.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:22 pm
The actual amount this one knows is too microscopic to be measured.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:24 pmWhich one? Hillbilly or AoR?
Comment by ralph the wonder llama
AoR. Frankly, I haven’t seen such stupidity since… the last post of AoR.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:25 pmAnd Hendler…well, I don’t even give my stupidtrollmeter the lightest glimpse of Hendler.
The only thing giving you a headache is the constant drumming of fear you hear from this administration.
Comment by hellinabucket — November 30, 2007 @ 5:23 pm
I thought it was because AoR has this little tiny brain rattling around his big fat skull. But you’re probably right.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:25 pmI’ll leave the Gaydar to you and the rest of the liberal ladies here at TP. Hear that RU?
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:24 pm
Don’t go away mad, just go away. Buhbye.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:27 pmIt’s incredible that this loser keeps coming to the TP gunfight with a butter knife he calls ‘wit’.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:27 pmAL Qaeda is YOUR CREATION – you completely ‘tarded little moron!
Comment by republicans hate facts — November 30, 2007 @ 5:24 pm
Hendler, Stanford? Oh that’s a good one. How drunk was he when he thought we’d believe that one? Oh Jason, look over their.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:29 pmFor those of you who didn’t want to dig through the raw data, here is the distillation of Hill’reh’s precipitous slide in the Granite State:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314244,00.html
RURiCurious,
Did I answer your question on prez candidates?
November 30th, 2007 at 5:30 pmComment by republicans hate facts — November 30, 2007 @ 5:27 pm
He left a while ago, you knuckle-dragging azzclown. Learn to read.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:30 pmIt’s incredible that this loser keeps coming to the TP gunfight with a butter knife he calls ‘wit’.
Comment by RUCerious — November 30, 2007 @ 5:27 pm
Yeah, if I wasn’t a woman I might feel guilty about fighting an unarmed man.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:31 pmSeven intelligence agencies working for Saddam and not even once did they have operational contact with AQ, sure sure.
And your evidence of this in 4, 3, 2…. Oh, you don’t have a shred, just a hunch?
November 30th, 2007 at 5:31 pmDoesn’t matter that the secular Sadaam was no friend to the Islamic Fundies?
No, facts don’t matter when you can just make shit up.
Did I answer your question on prez candidates?
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — November 30, 2007 @ 5:30 pm
Uh, NO.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:32 pmI asked you who YOUR candidate was. Can’t you effing read?
#131, Shayne,
Yep, went to Stanford, and just saw that my 7th patent has been approved. I will admit, that there were two classes of students at Stanford. Once class was always stacked up on perfect scores in the grade distribution curve. The second followed the normal bell curve, where I always fell right in the middle, so I do not pretend to be in the same league with those who were phenominally gifted in the maths / sciences, to the point of unfailing perfection.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:33 pmComment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
If your conjecture is correct then it should not be very difficult to come up with some strong evidences to support it.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:34 pmHe left a while ago, you knuckle-dragging azzclown. Learn to read.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:30 pm
Do you know how these posts work numbnutz. I suppose it’s too complicated for you to realize he hadn’t gotten to the post where Exlax was leaving for his weekend drinking binge. Try to pay attention.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:34 pmExlax, Hendler and you are neither liberal, nor ladies, but you’re most likely closet cases based on the GOP psychosis…
Comment by republicans hate facts — November 30, 2007 @ 5:25 pm
You are definitely not on your game tonight, medusa; usually by now you have called someone a “fascist ‘tard”. Get in the game, puddy, we all expect more out of you.
I am REALLY disappointed in the new crop of liberal morons here at TP, I miss the old guard like nutitch and the Good Spinster Zooey.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:35 pmNo, facts don’t matter when you can just make shit up.
Comment by RUCerious — November 30, 2007 @ 5:31 pm
Facts are like Kryptonite to our Repukian Trolls.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:35 pm#136, RUBiCurious,
I told you, I am looking for a leader who will push the next great economic / social / structural leap forward. Right now, those individuals are all in venture capital start-ups, so that they can cash in.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:36 pmCongrats on the 7th patent Jason.
Now if you can just find a market for snake oil, you’re in bidness.
BTW, try the White House…
November 30th, 2007 at 5:36 pmYep, went to Stanford, and just saw that my 7th patent has been approved. – Jason
If you went to Stanford you’d probably know that your patent HAD been approved in the previous sentence, idiot.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:37 pmYou gotta kind of admire the tactics of a troll like AoR. He goes for the twisted, tangled mass of lies, distortions and plain fcuked-up thinking in an effort to throw up a road block to progressive discussion. There are so many tantilizing loose ends of stupidity poking out of a statement like this:
AQ is everywhere over there except in the country of a guy who would have loved nothing better than to see its members take a few shots at the U.S? Seven intelligence agencies working for Saddam and not even once did they have operational contact with AQ, sure sure.
that it’s tempting to just grab one and start unraveling. But much like Bush’s anti-terrorism foreign policy, that’s a bad idea. There’s no straight through-line from one stupid statement to the next and you could get bogged down in a quagmire of troll feces before you know it.
Best just to leave it alone and call the clean-up crew.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:37 pmThen they aren’t candidates, are they.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:37 pmSo you’re telling me that you don’t support any of the declared candidates, Republican or Democrat?
Are you even going to bother voting? Write in, perhaps?
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:34 pm
I was just trying to be helpful to the young idiot; if not for me, she and the other dimwits like you would still be responding to posts from two hours ago.
Get your thumb out of you rear and keep up, I won’t give you advice for free much longer.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:38 pmOr spelling Hendler, obviously
PHENOMENALLY
Hard to believe you’d get into Stanford with your lack of skills. Unless of course you’re a Bush style legacy.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:40 pmBest just to leave it alone and call the clean-up crew.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — November 30, 2007 @ 5:37 pm
Liberalese for “I finally managed to understand a nugget of logic but I am not willing to admit it”.
You took the time to type out your hysterical (in more ways than one) rant but you aren’t willing to debate what I said…curiouser and curiouser.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:41 pmAQ is everywhere over there except in the country of a guy who would have loved nothing better than to see its members take a few shots at the U.S? Seven intelligence agencies working for Saddam and not even once did they have operational contact with AQ, sure sure.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
The nuances of the Middle East were lost on the Bush administration too. Iraq was secular. Al Qaeda is islamist. Iran is Shiite. Al Qaeda is sunni.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:41 pmThis IGNORANCE of the situation is what has landed us in the Quagmire we are in.
And the Surge is working BECAUSE Al Qaeda is no longer invisible. We have reversed Bremmers idiotic policies of DeBathification and disbanding Iraq’s military. We have granted Sunni’s defacto amnesty and duffle bags full of ca$h, and they are doing what no American troops could do….identify foreign Al Qaeda fighters in their communities. After FIVE YEARS!
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:41 pm
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Good one!
November 30th, 2007 at 5:42 pmI am REALLY disappointed in the new crop of liberal morons here at TP, I miss the old guard like nutitch and the Good Spinster Zooey.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:35 pm
You must have gone to school with Hendler. Look up the definition of spinster, Einstein. It means having never been married. Yeesh you really are dumber than a box of rocks.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:43 pmOnce class was always stacked up on perfect scores in the grade distribution curve. The second followed the normal bell curve, where I always fell right in the middle, so I do not pretend to be in the same league with those who were phenominally gifted in the maths / sciences, to the point of unfailing perfection.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler
Sometimes, you DO speak like a person, Jason.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:43 pmToo bad, the rest you are such a disgrace to humanity.
AQ is everywhere over there except in the country of a guy who would have loved nothing better than to see its members take a few shots at the U.S? Seven intelligence agencies working for Saddam and not even once did they have operational contact with AQ, sure sure.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
##
OK, I don’t have time to get into a long discussion about this for a variety of reasons. Let me just interject that Saddam was on speaking terms with the main heads of Al-Qaeda, mainly because they were a tremendous threat. Basically, Saddam viewed OBL the way that Rudy G. views Hillary. AQ is a Sunni organization, same as the former govt of Iraq, under Hussein. He knew that if they ever had a foothold in Iraq, he would be done for. Now Iraq, being majority Shia, will hopefully expel the Sunni elements out, but it is doubtful. Most of them receive a tremendous amount of funding from the Saudis, who have a limitless amount of money.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:44 pmComment by ralph the wonder llama — November 30, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
Thanks, though I didn’t expect it. :-)
November 30th, 2007 at 5:44 pm#146, RUBiCurious,
I haven’t voted in years, but I did vote for Perot twice.
Right now, there are only four candidates with executive experience: Bill Richardson, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney and Rudy Guilianni. Of those, only Mayor of New York comes close to the level of responsibility required to lead the US. These days, if you aren’t the governor of a large state (CA, NY, TX, FL, etc.) or mayor of a large city with a major port (LA, SF, NY, Miami, etc.), then you really aren’t qualified to be president.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:44 pmGet your thumb out of you rear and keep up, I won’t give you advice for free much longer.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:38 pm
That’s funny coming from somebody who obviously has his head wedged so firmly up his ass that his thumb couldn’t possibly fit. Stop projecting rightard.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:46 pmThanks for your honest response, Jason.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:48 pmYou must have gone to school with Hendler. Look up the definition of spinster, Einstein. It means having never been married. Yeesh you really are dumber than a box of rocks.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:43 pm
The Cat Lady was married? Whoa…what man would subject himself to that sort of abuse, I mean besides the toothless hobos that you have hooked up with?
You got me there, I had no idea that Zoo was married. (shudder)
November 30th, 2007 at 5:51 pmYou got me there, I had no idea that Zoo was married. (shudder)
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 5:51 pm
I assume even your crack whore mother was married for a short while. But I could be wrong and you’re a bastard.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:57 pmAoR, please take your tiny little derringer (pistol) and go shoot it off somewhere safe.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:59 pmSounds like you need some real release.
I assume even your crack whore mother was married for a short while. But I could be wrong and you’re a bastard.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 5:57 pm
It wasn’t crack, it was good ol’ fashioned marajooana. But like I said, you got me on the marital status of “currently between jobs” Zooster (and her eighteen cats). Big kudos to you!
BTW, do you use that potty mouth around your kid? Shame shame, they hear and understand more than you know, which obviously isn’t much.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:01 pmThese days, if you aren’t the governor of a large state (CA, NY, TX, FL, etc.) or mayor of a large city with a major port (LA, SF, NY, Miami, etc.), then you really aren’t qualified to be president.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — November 30, 2007 @ 5:44 pm
I suspect you aren’t alone in your thinking, because out of the past 5 presidents we’ve had, four were governors with no political experience on the federal level — the exception being H.W. Bush. Voters like electing governors. Maybe for the “executive” experience, or maybe because they are perceived as Washington outsiders.
Our current president was governor of a large state (Texas), supposedly making him more qualified to be president (by your standards) than any other president in the past 75 years with the exceptions of Reagan and FDR (also governors of large states).
Forgive me if I’m a bit unimpressed with the results of hiring such a “qualified” candidate for the job.
I agree that executive experience can be helpful in the POTUS job. But I also believe that foreign policy experience is just as helpful — something that the Washington crowd has over the state and city level execs, so I wouldn’t rule out U.S. legislative experience.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:02 pmTOTAL CONFIRM BY FAUX NEWS ON TROY STANLEY
Comment by ccokz — November 30, 2007 @ 6:00 pm
I’m grateful that the man wasn’t wearing a real bomb and that nobody was in any danger. I hope that this mentally ill man gets the help he needs. And, because he is obviously a threat to society, I hope is removed from society while he gets it.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:06 pmComment by RUCerious — November 30, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
Spousal problems creeping into your blog life? Don’t worry, you and gummitch can always start a self-help group for those who have trouble with maintaining marital bliss.
I don’t own a derringer, though my collection does include a beautiful and tricked-out M4.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:06 pmBTW, do you use that potty mouth around your kid? Shame shame, they hear and understand more than you know, which obviously isn’t much.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
Oh I guess it is you CT, outed yourself again. And I know this is all very confusing for you but I don’t have to talk out loud when I type.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:21 pmOT:
Evil Knievel died. Damm shame, he was too cool for words.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:23 pmEisenberg has been taken by police unharmed. Situation over.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:23 pmI don’t own a derringer, though my collection does include a beautiful and tricked-out M4.
Comment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 6:06 pm
He was just being charitable. I could have told him you’re carrying a pea shooter.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:23 pmhoorah… excellent police work…
November 30th, 2007 at 6:28 pmthank the gods…
He was just being charitable. I could have told him you’re carrying a pea shooter.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 6:23 pm
Realllllllyyyyyyy…and how would you know that? Stupid girl, perhaps if you spent less time ‘working out of the house’ (call girls working from their house??) and more time in the real world you might understand things better.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:29 pmDoes your M4 have the S-1-F or S-1-3 trigger group?
November 30th, 2007 at 6:29 pmDoes your M4 have the S-1-F or S-1-3 trigger group?
Comment by RUCerious — November 30, 2007 @ 6:29 pm
Pea shooters don’t have triggers. But Mr. P or CT who ever it is called me a girl. Ain’t he sweet?
November 30th, 2007 at 6:34 pmI have no idea about the trigger group, honestly. It is a pre-owned Colt though I added most of the external bling myself.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:34 pmHave you ever fired the damn thing?
November 30th, 2007 at 6:35 pmComment by Age of Rifles — November 30, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
Oh I guess it is you CT, outed yourself again. And I know this is all very confusing for you but I don’t have to talk out loud when I type.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 6:21 pm
I thought it was CT. Thanks for verifying for me, Shayne. There’s something about the heady combination of distortions, misplaced arrogance and vulgarity that was just so… “CT”.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:38 pmI have put maybe five hundred rounds through it, of mostly military surplus ammo. You would be amazed where some of that surplus ammo comes from, the stuff I currently have is Filipino, of all things.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:41 pmI am very glad no one was hurt, but is it just me or does this remind anyone of the anthrax attacks right before the passage of the Patriot Act in Oct. 2001?
We have the S 1959 “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007″ waiting in committee and it just passed the House 404 to 6.
And the guy being interviewed said that this guy (he was “told”) was into “conspiracy theories and such”.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/bomb-wearing-homegrown-terrorist-and-s-1959-vs-anthrax-attacks-and-patriot-act/
November 30th, 2007 at 6:42 pmWhen you took off the safety, were you able to fire on full auto as well as single shot, or only 3 round burst?
November 30th, 2007 at 6:44 pmI don’t need a gun, I have a big d!ck.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:48 pmAfter FIVE YEARS!
Comment by Badger — November 30, 2007 @ 5:41 pm
That is WAAAYYY too complicated for trolls to understand, Badger.
Is there any way to explain this using out takes from “Girls Gone Wild”? At least thye’d be paying attention.
Or perhaps “Pages Gone Wild” would work even better.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:50 pmI guess we should tell AoR that owning or possessing one of his tricked out M4s is a federal offense…
November 30th, 2007 at 6:50 pmDumbass, doesn’t even know what a trigger group is…Shouldn’t be playing with the damn thing anyhow.
Oh I guess it is you CT, outed yourself again. And I know this is all very confusing for you but I don’t have to talk out loud when I type.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 6:21 pm
I thought it was CT. Thanks for verifying for me, Shayne. There’s something about the heady combination of distortions, misplaced arrogance and vulgarity that was just so… “CTâ€.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — November 30, 2007 @ 6:38 pm
Eh, I figured it was Mr. Pee, who has always been fascinated by my personal life, and Zooey’s. I’ve tried to explain to him that I can’t possibly be his daddy, but the poor little twit is desperate for attention.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:51 pmi dunno about CT, but this one reminds me – unfortunately -
of a long-ago-banned “I R I” (think, “right between the eyes”)…
not sure how many here would remember THAT one,
but it was way too soon to have ever heard from it again…
useless trouble maker…
but, between ex and hintler, all combined, the derailing
November 30th, 2007 at 6:52 pmwas very effective… almost impressive…
…
I guess we should tell AoR that owning or possessing one of his tricked out M4s is a federal offense…
Dumbass, doesn’t even know what a trigger group is…Shouldn’t be playing with the damn thing anyhow.
Comment by RUCerious — November 30, 2007 @ 6:50 pm
hehehe…what law books are you studying? A federal offense? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Moron. Don’t be afraid, the nasty guns won’t bite.
November 30th, 2007 at 6:58 pmYou’ll run out of bullets, tRifleman, but I’ll nevar run out of rocks….
November 30th, 2007 at 7:01 pmIs there any way to explain this using out takes from “Girls Gone Wild� At least thye’d be paying attention.
Or perhaps “Pages Gone Wild†would work even better.
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — November 30, 2007 @ 6:50 pm
Girls Gone Wild is way to scary for our pansy trolls. They’d piss all over themselves looking at girls that actually move. They have to stick to their cheap magazines.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:02 pmHmm… this seventh-grade insta-troll trick seems more Mr. Pee than CT…
Not that it matters. Both are pathetic images of right-wing “manhood”.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:06 pmNow with his rapid responses, modeled after his nonexistant sex life, the little limp … wristed … troll does kind of seem like Mr. P modeling CT’s trolling. Too bad the dumb little rightard is going to get himself kicked out of here on one of his first forays back to adulthood. He’s not ready anyway.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:13 pmI must divorce that mutant!
Comment by Shaynes husband — November 30, 2007 @ 7:12 pm
Good one, divorce. You can’t even get a date on Friday night in a college town. You couldn’t get lucky in a prison, with a fistful of pardons. Not even a men’s prison you fatass rightard. Maybe if you weren’t such a loser you could go buy yourself a transexual crack whore but you mom probably won’t give you enough money for that will she?
November 30th, 2007 at 7:16 pmfrom wiki
Sales of actual M4s by Colt are restricted to military and civilian law enforcement. Only under special circumstances can a private citizen own an official M4 Carbine. While many machine guns can be legally owned with a proper tax stamp from the BATFE, an amendment to the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 barred the transfer to private citizens of machine guns made in the U.S. after May 19, 1986. The only exception was for Special Occupational Taxpayers (SOT): licensed machine gun dealers with demonstration letters, manufacturers, and those dealing in exports and imports. As such, only the earliest Colt M4 prototypes built prior to May 19, 1986 would be legal to own by civilians not in the categories mentioned.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:21 pmI support my wife financially and she does nothing for a living. That will soon change.
Comment by Shaynes husband — November 30, 2007 @ 7:23 pm
Keep talking rightard, I keep pasting them and sending them to administrators. You won’t be around much longer.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:25 pmI WANT A DIVORCE!
Comment by Shaynes husband
You’re already divorced from reality. I would think the alimony you’re currently paying for THAT little mistake would make you think twice.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:31 pmAnd… he’s gone. Well, we warned the little twit.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:34 pm“Perhaps I’ll need to force a judge to bring me back to reality!”
Advocating violence against the judiciary? Why does that not surprise me?
November 30th, 2007 at 7:41 pmLooks like a typical Friday evening. The TP moderators hit the cocktails, and the trolls have nowhere to go, so they crawl out from under the fridge to play.
Have a great evening, in spite of it all. I’m off for a beer or 12.
November 30th, 2007 at 7:41 pmDammit, gum. Now I have to have a beer when I get home.
November 30th, 2007 at 8:00 pmThe intelligent women always get targeted by the Wingnuts, they can’t handle dat’ sheet.
November 30th, 2007 at 9:34 pmHey we drove him crazy enough that he got booted out of here. The trolls are losing it.
November 30th, 2007 at 10:47 pmThe trolls are losing it.
Comment by Shayne — November 30, 2007 @ 10:47 pm
That bridge was crossed, and burned down, long before “Al created the internets”. Unfortunately, it seems to be contagious. Kind of like VD.
November 30th, 2007 at 11:42 pmGood job of exterminating the cockroach.
December 1st, 2007 at 12:41 amDidn’t know what a trigger group was.
For Kreists Sake, that kind of gun groupie is downright dangerous.
I don’t mind him blowing a few fingers off his own hand, but they usually wind up taking a couple of innocents with them.
These nut-cases always go after good people like John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Abraham Lincoln, Ghandi, Martin Luther King, and now an attempt on Hillary Clinton. Why didn’t he go after someone evil like George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, or Donald Rumsfeld?
December 1st, 2007 at 1:29 amYou seem to have this piece out of context. There was of course the why piece as well as the who and how.
December 1st, 2007 at 2:20 amFrom the NY Times, a cautionary tale to go with the “successfull surge”
The Iraqi government lacks a mechanism to settle property disputes if former residents return to Baghdad only to find their homes occupied, the officials said. Nor has the Iraqi government come forward with a detailed plan to provide aid, shelter and other essential services to the thousands of Iraqis who might return. American commanders caution that if the return is not carefully managed, there is a risk of undermining the recent security gains.
December 1st, 2007 at 7:22 amAl Qaeda’s there and so are US troops. Hence you kick the fk out of them there. That’s as complicated as the equation gets.
Comment by Kilo — December 1, 2007 @ 4:39 am
that sounds like the exact same approach Al Qaeda used, only they’re kicking the fk out of us. Good work, kilo, you crazies have gotten it wrong from the start, and have spent over 5 years losing to a ragtag bunch of nobodies who took all of their strength fromyour hatred and ignorance of how things work. 2007=highest US troop deaths. Way to go! You and your troop-hating minions of the 24% must be very happy, especially since you can now take a congressman’s words (a guy you called a liar and a traitor, even) out of context in order to get more Americans killed. You couldn’t be more stupid, but you have given it a good try.
December 1st, 2007 at 8:12 amSo this was literally cribbed from Tommy Boy? Road flares=dynamite, TV news comes running, you get your message aired. Holy schnikes..
December 1st, 2007 at 10:16 amIf Hill’reh can’t protect her own campaign headquarters from the average looney bird, then how is she going to protect our country from terrorists?
December 1st, 2007 at 10:49 amI wonder how this would have played out in Repuppetcan circles if this Man’s last name were Abdullah?
RIP
December 1st, 2007 at 11:47 pmSGt Stephen R. Sherman
C CO 1-5 IN (STRYKER)
KIA 3 Feb 2005
Mosul, Iraq