The Senate vote was 55 NOT guilty and 45 guilty. It really was in all the papers at the time. I don’t know how you could have missed it!

Republican Senators Chafee-RI, Collins-ME, Gorton-WA, Jeffords-VT, Shelby-AL, Snowe-ME, Specter-PA, Stevens-AK, and Warner-VA voted that Clinton was NOT guilty.

Craig-ID, the hypocrite, voted guilty.

U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright ruled that Clinton was NOT guilty of perjury nor obstruction of justice.

“Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.”—PS&AG

This excuse coming from a person who has helped pass laws that discriminate against gay people is not believable, in my opinion.

No straight man I know (let alone a homophobe) would ever even think of admitting to “lewd behavior” involving another man.

I can’t see how any honest person could come away with that.

And I think there is plenty of reasons to believe he is gay. But that is not the problem. The problem is that he pleaded guilty to lewd behavior.

Why does it hurt you so much that he might just be? So what if he is?

Oh well. You people have no shame, you will believe anything about any political opponent because all you have is your partisan hatred.

Yeah, I hate the man because of the party he belongs to. Right.

Cragi is right and everyone else is wrong, the police officer, the judge, the airport authority; they’re all trying to end Craig’s political career.

Your accusation is laughable.

We all know that none of you will feel any guilty or remorse if it turns out that it was all a political witch hunt.

And I suppose the Republicans who have also asked for his resignation are part of this vast conspiracy/political witch hunt.

Do you read your stuff before you hit “Post”?

Bleeding heart liberals apparently don’t exist any more.

I have no idea what this is even supposed to mean.

Craig is gay, a hypocrite, and not too bright. But the really bad news is that he likes trolling public restrooms for sex.

Is Larry Craig Gay yet?
.

Oh, and while I am on Snopes, you asked me to name names on who in the Republican party says they are anti-Gay?

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/falwell.htm

Before “Don’t ask, don’t tell” gays were banned from serving in the military entirely, thus with “Don’t ask, don’t tell” Clinton was achieving something towards at least to some small degree, meeting his promise of allowing gays to serve openly in the military.

Before “Don’t ask, don’t tell” gays were banned from serving in the military entirely, thus achieving at least to some small degree, his promise of allowing gays to serve openly in the military. What Clinton did was he compromised in order to let gays serve provided they keep quiet about it.

Of course, the fact that Clinton wasn’t perfect, also comes into play here. Just because Clinton did it doesn’t make it okay, it is after all, only the Republican party that seems to think that their leaders are infallible.

Or pretending that he authorized the CIA to kill Osama bin Laden – he didn’t.

Only if you believe Path to 9/11, which you are just about stupid enough to I must admit.

Personally, I check things out with…

Snopes

No, it’s only abhorrent when the aforementioned Republican is someone who makes his living attacking “the gay lifestyle” and “the gay agenda.” And even then, it’s only abhorrent because it’s hypocritical.

The latest report: Craig is still gay. And a sexual deviant, for trolling mens’ rooms.

In 8 short years, we have gone from debating what consitutes sexual relations (An really, what Clinton did qualified) to debating what constitutes torture.

We have gone from America having a president who got impeached over what amounted to lying about a blowjob, to a president who isn’t getting impeached over illegal spying, lying America into a war, and even possibly being behind a case of outright treason vis a vis the Plame scandal.

It really shows how things have slid now doesn’t it?

My mistake, she was Leon Panetta’s intern right up until her supervisors removed her because she was spending too much time with Clinton.

And before you say something along the lines of “Well he was getting rid of her” she then went on to try and convince Tripp to lie about the affair in what appears to have been a bid to protect Clinton.

Hardly evidence of her being in any way positively or negatively prejudiced by the affair when it came to her work.

Comment by DreamCrusher — December 3, 2007 @ 11

So spell it out for us. Does a deep kiss count as “sexual relations”? How about coping a feel? Flirting?

I have heard countless times on CNN, people say that Clinton committed perjury. Jack Cafferty said it about five days ago. It is NOT true.

Yeah, O. Bigfoot, that’s why in the middle of a war you guys still oppose having gays being allowed to serve in the military, get married, or having crimes which specifically target gays in order to terrorise them, being termed hate crimes.

Further, I am going to assume that you didn’t mean to say public sex is a liberal more – seen as that is one of the odder things liberals have been accused of being proponents of.