Comments on: Time for Boehner to update his website on Iran.

By: republicanSScareme

republicanSScareme — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:21:21 +0000

Boehner can’t change his shorts without an okay from Dubya.

By: natisman

natisman — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:04:39 +0000

Tears from the used car salesman of the house will will clear all this up if necessary. I mean now he has somthing to cry about again!

So do you think he really sells lots of undercoating with a coat of it applied to his body?

By: toasterhead

toasterhead — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:48:03 +0000

I had this great vista of the chymp hoisted up onto the top of a Titan missile, rocking back and forth trying to rattle the damn thing.
Patooie!~

Comment by RUCerious â€” December 4, 2007 @ 12:24 am

I picture Yosemite Sam dancing around on the nose cone trying to get the ICBM to launch after the fuse has already burnt its way up into the first-stage solid rocket motor but failed to ignite it.

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:24:48 +0000

Geez toasty, you know how to damper down, don’tcha?

I had this great vista of the chymp hoisted up onto the top of a Titan missile, rocking back and forth trying to rattle the damn thing.
Patooie!~

By: The Republic of Stupidity

The Republic of Stupidity — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:13:18 +0000

The name is BO-ner… John BO-ner.

By: toasterhead

toasterhead — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:37:10 +0000

God thatâ€™s funny, isnâ€™t there an Iranian web site that says that
America is â€œgoverned by a fanatic and actively rattling nuclear weaponsâ€:

Comment by RUCerious â€” December 3, 2007 @ 6:13 pm

Now that’s a complete and irresponsible fabrication – where did you read those LIES?

You can’t rattle a nuclear weapon – they weigh several hundred tons each and are built with 60s and 70s-era solid state technology. Even if you could manage to shake it in a manner that could be described as “rattling” you’d most likely shake a wire loose or disconnect a diode or something and that’d make for a REALLY expensive metaphor, wouldn’t it!!

By: MapleStreet

MapleStreet — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:53:35 +0000

As much fun as it is to rag Boehner, isn’t there some way this can be used constructively ?

For example, a commercial detailing the NIE conclusions (and the timeline of their release, including any pre-pub releases to congress)

-and-

juxtapose that with the wording on his web page ?

Perhaps a split screen showing the clock running with the NIE released and the web page just sitting there.

By: Badger

Badger — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:49:06 +0000

The NIE report will give China and Russia all the reasons they need to block further US sanctions against Iran. The NIE says that Iran has stopped their nuclear weapons program…..if we punish them for that…..what’s the incentive to cooperate at all.???

By: Lefty Patriot

Lefty Patriot — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:28:58 +0000

I must have missed it. Did Iran fully stop producing Nuke material today?

Comment by Roger_Roger â€” December 3, 2007 @ 5:34 pm

Why should they? We haven’t.

By: had enough

had enough — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:42:15 +0000

Leftside Annie
Thom Hartman has been talking of this issue… he is very concerned.
These neocons will do anything to win.
If they get enough signatures, and the election can be won by simple majority, then I can just imagine how fast they can get their base to vote in an election no one cares about and will not bother to vote.

By: Leftside Annie

Leftside Annie — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:29:48 +0000

36 – I’m in Los Angeles; this is the second time they’ve tried to sneak this crap through. I don’t think it’s gonna fly this time either. Even if they manage to cheat it onto the ballot, I think it’ll die a well-deserved death.

Fingers crossed.

By: Leftside Annie

Leftside Annie — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:27:41 +0000

32 – RU – that one made me laugh out loud. Good ‘un!!

By: had enough

had enough — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:21:49 +0000

OT
very worried about California proposal in play could sway 2008 presidential election

brought to you by Swift Boaters
It appears CA may get enough signatures… does anyone know if they need a simple majority to win this election held this summer?
This needs attention…if the Swift Boaters get this passed, the ‘08 presidency may go to the Republicans.

By: Bush Cover Ups

Bush Cover Ups — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:21:33 +0000

so glad im not got to see images of children being vapourised with nuclear weapons their skin falling off and millions dying of radiation sickness from dropping nuclear weapons on innocent people and I can say AGAIN

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:19:59 +0000

Santions?

Isn’t that an Iranian rock group? Moron!

By: Bush Cover Ups

Bush Cover Ups — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:15:59 +0000

lets drop the UN sanctions then and restore the republican Guards to normal soldier status and pay 10 billion as compensation to the poor of Iran who get affected by the Santions AND OF COURSE A BIG SORRY

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:13:52 +0000

God that’s funny, isn’t there an Iranian web site that says that
America is â€œgoverned by a fanatic and actively rattling nuclear weaponsâ€:

By: Bush Cover Ups

Bush Cover Ups — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:12:13 +0000

Heres the real reason

The New IAEA regulations should keep newcomers away from producing their own enriched uranium. The US, UK, France, Germany, Russia, China and Japan will become the worldâ€™s nuclear filling stations. Under the auspices of the IAEA these suppliers will dictate the rules, the prices and the currencies they want to get paid in. Iran has become the pretext and test case for their plans. The problems of tomorrowâ€™s world economy are being shaped today.

we now have an anti-Iranian alliance of the US and E3. They smell the opportunity for a coup to seize worldâ€™s nuclear fuel market. To succeed, they would just need some legal sauce on the prohibition of uranium enrichment by non-nuclear-weapon states, with Iran as example. And a UN Security Council resolution would be enough, if it legalizes IAEAâ€™s stand that it can forbid countries to enrich uranium.

Of course, they would make it impossible for Iran to stay within the Non-Proliferation Treaty then. To succeed their coup, they will have to take care, that Iran does not leave the organization before a resolution is successfully voted. For if so, there would not be any ground for a resolution anymore.

By: Chris L

Chris L — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:09:15 +0000

India has WMD, is a Socialist country, and refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. RogerX2, when should we invade?

By: Bush Cover Ups

Bush Cover Ups — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:08:56 +0000

Meanwhile, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s president, said that the issue of Tehran’s controversial nuclear programme was “closed” and that his country was prepared for any eventuality.

Me too Shutup Neocons