Think Progress

Joe Klein Calls Bush’s Response To NIE ‘An Amazing Moment Of Candor By The United States’»

This week Joe Klein authors Time’s front cover story on Iran, titled, “Iran’s Nukes: Now They Tell Us,” in reference to the recent intelligence revelations that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

Today on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Klein cheered President Bush’s response to the NIE, stating that it was “an amazing moment of candor by the United States”:

The Bush reaction to this — he didn’t try to block it. He didn’t try to postpone it. He didn’t spend weeks, he didn’t ask the intelligence community ‘give me a couple of weeks, let’s see if we can figure out some kind of negotiating initiative or some way to respond to this.’ He didn’t try to spin it to our advantage. This is an amazing moment of candor by the United States.

Watch it:

Screenshot

Contrary to Klein’s assertion that the White House “didn’t try to block it,” the NIE was completed a year ago but stalled by the White House in an effort to “make the document more supportive of U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney’s militarily aggressive policy toward Iran.”

Moreover, the White House confirmed that Bush lied to the public, as he was told in August that Iran’s nuclear weapons program “may be suspended.” (Bush previously said he was never told what information the intelligence community possessed.) A skeptical Joe Scarborough responded to Klein’s cheerleading for the administration, stating, “Well that’s one way to look at it,” then explained that Bush continued to warn of World War III with Iran despite knowing better. Klein chuckled, “There is that…”

In Joe Klein’s world, once White House deception and deceit is revealed to the public, it becomes “amazing candor.”

Digg It!

147







Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

146 Responses to “Joe Klein Calls Bush’s Response To NIE ‘An Amazing Moment Of Candor By The United States’”


  1. natisman Says:

    first, yaa ba dabba doo!


  2. deebaser Says:

    These people live in a different reality. It is frightening.


  3. PatrioticLiberalChristian Says:

    Joe Klein, what substance did you take and when did you take it?


  4. DieNowForPeace Says:

    Sure thing d*ckhead,
    As if Shrub WASN’T spinning the NIE to his advantage late yesterday, claiming it’s a “warning sign”?
    Yeah, a warning sign that our Presidunce is THE threat to our National Security.


  5. Kay Says:

    More pandering to the Israeli Lobby. Ready, Mossad? We’re going into Iran.


  6. BearCountry Says:

    Joke Line is simply incredible. This is considered to be the liberal voice at time magazine. How do they justify that except by saying that he is the liberal voice at time magazine; a circular definition. By time defining him in that way they can allow him to attack liberals as hard as they want him to and to praise any and all neocons to show how “nonpartisan” he is. In other words, when the viewer/reader has all the facts, as Joke Line did in the FISA columns, the conclusion would be that the rethug view is the correct one.


  7. Menehune Says:

    Hummina…hummina…hummina… does not equal candor.


  8. Krazny Says:

    So lying equals the truth. How I miss the days when a president could be impeached for lying to a grand jury.


  9. MapleStreet Says:

    Having no idea who Joe Klein was, I found his Conde Nast portfolio. They do a nice job on making fun of him:

    http://www.portfolio.com/ views/ blogs/ mixed-media/ 2007/ 12/ 05/ deep-read-radar-on-joe-klein

    The complementary line was (quoting John Cook): “Klein’s body of work amounts to little more than a festival of projection and poorly disguised vanity,”


  10. Zooey Says:

    I can never hear anything Joe Klein says….

    I’m mesmerized by his drag queen eyebrows…


  11. Leftside Annie Says:

    Wow. An “amazing moment of candor”….?

    Well, at least *he’s* not saying that it’s a “propaganda victory for Iran” like *this* mook:

    http://news.yahoo.com/ s/ realclearpolitics/ 20071206/ cm_rcp/ nie_report_is_propoganda_victo;_ylt=AjLOku4tQkCaNU6g4j9n2yj9wxIF


  12. km4 Says:

    Bush apologists like Joe Klein have become irrelevant media jackasses.


  13. grover nerdkissed Says:

    WTF is he still doing in the media?!?!?!?


  14. Exley Says:

    Former CIA agent (and frequent Bush critic) Bob Baer agrees with Klein:

    Was Bush Behind the Iran Report?
    By Robert Baer
    Tuesday, Dec. 04, 2007

    Bombing Iran, it seems, is now off the table. There’s no other reasonable take on the latest National Intelligence Estimate that concludes Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

    But there is also no doubt that the Bush White House was behind this NIE.

    While the 16 intelligence agencies that make up the “intelligence community” contribute to each National Intelligence Estimate, you can bet that an explosive, 180-degree turn on Iran like this one was greenlighted by the President.

    And explode is what the hawks in and outside the Administration are about to do. They were counting on Bush being the one President prepared to take on Iran…

    The real story behind this NIE is that the Bush Administration has finally concluded Iran is a bridge too far. With Iranian-backed Shi’a groups behaving themselves, things are looking up in Iraq. In Lebanon, the anti-Syrian coalition and pro-Syrian coalition, which includes Iran’s surrogate Hizballah, reportedly have settled on a compromise candidate, the army commander General Michel Suleiman. Bombing Iran now would upset the fragile balance in these two countries. Not to mention that Hizballah has threatened to shell Israel if we as much as touch a hair on Iran’s head…

    So how far is Iran from a nuke? The new NIE says 10 to 15 years, maybe. But that’s a wild guess. The truth is that Iran is a black hole, and it’s entirely conceivable Iran could build a bomb and we wouldn’t know until they tested it.

    Yet for now we should at least be happy with the good news: Armageddon is postponed.

    Robert Baer, a former CIA field officer assigned to the Middle East, is TIME.com’s intelligence columnist

    http://www.time.com/ time/ world/ article/ 0,8599,1690696,00.html


  15. rmwarnick Says:

    You have to wonder what the Bush administration has on these so-called journalists. Blackmail is the only logical explanation.


  16. PatrioticLiberalChristian Says:

    Joe Klein OR Joke Line?


  17. NoOneYouKnow Says:

    Wow. Joke Line: “The president told the truth (after being forced to). It’s a truly historical moment for this great country.” How is this guy a liberal?


  18. nellre Says:

    I wish the story with Bush demanding that Iran “come clean” that came out yesterday would stay in the top stories for days and days.
    It’s a repeat of his demands to Saddam.
    Can America really be this stupid?


  19. Chris L Says:

    “Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans wrote to the House and Senate committees on Intelligence today, demanding immediate hearings on the whole National Intelligence Estimate matter.”

    http://vetvoice.com/ showDiary.do;jsessionid=217E3052B2A5C34A31BE0AF410E4ED7F?diaryId=198


  20. Kevster Says:

    Joke Line must have Peter Hoekstra on speed dial. He just can’t seem to get his GOP talking points fast enough. To consider the release of the NIE and the WH spin around it as candor reveals just how out of touch with reality he is.

    The better story is: what cataclysmic behind-the-scenes machinations occurred before its release? You can bet the house that BushCo was facing a wholesale mutiny from the Armed Services if he continued to propagate a false case for war. As the Ashcroft/Comey/Gonzo hospital episode proved, the only thing Bush and Cheney will back down from is a wholesale mass resignation. I believe that’s what was on the line and I’d love to see some reporting on that.


  21. Juan C. Says:

    So this was the spin they prepared after Iran nuke’s fiasco?

    As creative as a porn movie…


  22. GSD Says:

    I’m just doing my job. Which is to fellate the powerful.

    -Joke Line


  23. bernard quatermass Says:

    “Yet for now we should at least be happy with the good news: Armageddon is postponed.”

    Not while jackasses like GWB have fingers anywhere near important buttons.


  24. raynman Says:

    Today’s journalism is more about pandering then about exposing the facts.

    What’s scary is that there are so many different articles, puff pieces and spin machines that the Right can access to ‘prove’ that they’ve been right all along.

    All we have are the facts… and the media seems to have decided that the facts’ noted liberal bias must be countered.


  25. Uncle Ho Says:

    I’m sooooo glad that I canceled my subscription to Time years ago. Between the Bush water carriers like Klein and krauthammer and kool-aid drinkers like Billy boy Kristol, Time has become a sick joke.


  26. Juan C. Says:

    Not while jackasses like GWB have fingers anywhere near important buttons.
    Comment by bernard quatermass

    I bet Bush is forbidden even to touch the glasses of wine.


  27. Juan C. Says:

    So, will somebody apologize to Iran soon?


  28. Menehune Says:

    Time Warner/CNN had completely moved on from the NIE story today. The omaha shooting completely moved it out of the news rotation. And there’s the “economy rebounded in one day and is now great again and everything will be back to normal once Bush saves the little guy from foreclosure” cheerleading. No time for “candor”.


  29. Exley Says:

    “…the NIE was completed a year ago but stalled by the White House”

    Ummm, no. That is false. And how do we know this? Because ThinkProgress itself in today’s “ThinkFast” section links to an article in today’s New York Times that reveals that the NIE was still being prepared in summer 2007 and that information discovered in 2007 was being corroborated “in recent months.”

    Sorry, Satyam. Your own Web site has provided the proof that undermines your baseless claim. This idea that the NIE was delayed a year is a myth. Even ThinkProgress acknowledges that.

    Details in Military Notes Led to Shift on Iran, U.S. Says
    New York Times:

    WASHINGTON, Dec. 5 — American intelligence agencies reversed their view about the status of Iran’s nuclear weapons program after they obtained notes last summer from the deliberations of Iranian military officials involved in the weapons development program, senior intelligence and government officials said on Wednesday.

    The notes included conversations and deliberations in which some of the military officials complained bitterly about what they termed a decision by their superiors in late 2003 to shut down a complex engineering effort to design nuclear weapons, including a warhead that could fit atop Iranian missiles.

    Ultimately, the notes and deliberations were corroborated by other intelligence, the officials said, including intercepted conversations among Iranian officials, collected in recent months.


  30. toasterhead Says:

    While the 16 intelligence agencies that make up the “intelligence community” contribute to each National Intelligence Estimate, you can bet that an explosive, 180-degree turn on Iran like this one was greenlighted by the President.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 11:24 am

    So which Bush is the real one? The passive-aggressive Bush who two months ago was whining about World War III, the Bush of Baer’s narrative who stood up to the neocons and greenlighted the NIE, or the Bush of Bush’s narrative who knew that there was information but didn’t know the information?

    The question is - what did Bush not know and when didn’t he know it?


  31. Anne Says:

    What is he talking about candor? Bush continues to spin this! Joe Klein is becoming the worst of the worst.


  32. Bob Says:

    It sure is exasperating hearing the same old justifications and excuses in the face of evidence to the contrary; being treated like three-year-olds by people with the mental capacity of two-year olds.


  33. Roket Says:

    I love the smell of journalists committing professional suicide in the morning. Sick him Glenn Greenwald.


  34. toasterhead Says:

    Sorry, Satyam. Your own Web site has provided the proof that undermines your baseless claim. This idea that the NIE was delayed a year is a myth. Even ThinkProgress acknowledges that.

    Details in Military Notes Led to Shift on Iran, U.S. Says
    New York Times:

    WASHINGTON, Dec. 5 — American intelligence agencies reversed their view about the status of Iran’s nuclear weapons program after they obtained notes last summer from the deliberations of Iranian military officials involved in the weapons development program, senior intelligence and government officials said on Wednesday.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 11:39 am

    And as Sy Hersh has been reporting and as the story you cite confirms, the administration had the critical info on the status of Iran’s nuclear weapons program in the summer of 2006, and the NIE was circulating in November 2006.

    http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5401


  35. john o. Says:

    Klein is moving beyond parody.


  36. Severus Says:

    Hmmm by Klein’s use of the word condor I thought it meant getting caught with your pants down, so I checked Webster’s and found that the meaning had not changed. Can Klein really believe himself?

    candor

    Main Entry:
    can·dor
    Pronunciation:
    \ˈkan-dər, -ˌdȯr\
    Function:
    noun
    Etymology:
    French & Latin; French candeur, from Latin candor, from candēre — more at candid
    Date:
    14th century
    1 a: whiteness, brilliance bobsolete : unstained purity2: freedom from prejudice or malice : fairness3archaic : kindliness4: unreserved, honest, or sincere expression : forthrightness


  37. Bobwurst Says:

    Exley,

    You’re regurgitating the whitehouse line again. Have you spoken with Dan Bartlett recently?


  38. gummitch Says:

    You’re regurgitating the whitehouse line again. Have you spoken with Dan Bartlett recently?

    Comment by Bobwurst — December 6, 2007 @ 11:55 am

    Exley loves a good liar.


  39. Buckie Boy Says:

    New speak -

    Caught in a lie = Amazing candor
    Black = White
    War = Peace
    Right = Right
    Left = Commie pinko

    Yes, it is amazing how they spin this crap.

    Bush/Cheney
    Hague Trials ‘09

    Buck Fush


  40. pluege Says:

    is there a greater fool and buffoon in our national discourse than Joe Klein?

    I think not.

    He seems to even be surpassing Thomas Friedman.


  41. DieNowForPeace Says:

    Exley needs an Ex-lax to relieve his mental constipation…


  42. DieNowForPeace Says:

    …but one dose only, cause too much can lead to verbal diarrhea.


  43. Marcus Aurelius Says:

    Rewriting history is one thing. Klein is trying to rewrite the present.


  44. DieNowForPeace Says:

    Comment by cold_hard_left

    Ah, is there anything better than watching the wingnuts just loose it, trying to spin their way out of the obvious fact that they worship a complete imbecile?

    Keep it up, you’re making our day…


  45. Chris L Says:

    Comment by cold_hard_left — December 6, 2007 @ 11:59 am
    ###

    So, what happened between July and now to make 16 intelligence agencies do a complete about face?


  46. GSD Says:

    Exley, what do you think of Bush exchanging love letters with Axis of Evil dictator Kim Jong Il?

    What next, a steam bath Pol Pot?

    -GSD


  47. Bush Cover Ups Says:

    It Turns Out Ahmadinejad Was the Truthful One


  48. hellinabucket Says:

    The latest NIE has had the same general content for the last 6 months according to several sources that are out there on the web.


  49. Exley Says:

    #44 “TP is lying to its drones and they blindly believe it, despite the facts.”

    Well, I don’t know if I would put it that way, but it is obvious that they have contradicted themselves is quite a dramatic fashion. It seems one hand did not know what the other was doing….

    Here Satyam publishes the false claim that the NIE was ready a year ago, yet in the ThinkFast thread, TP admits the NIE was not completed until recently and that new information was gathered in summer 2007 and being corroborated in recent months.

    Maybe Satyam did not know that the ThinkFast section contained information that completely undermined his false assertion. But now he knows….I am sure he will remove the incorrect statement or issue a correction shortly.


  50. Lefty Patriot Says:

    Exlax and cold flaccid lip are spinning like cop-car lights, trying to justify the admalistration’s treason and incompetence, but they are way out of the mainstream. America is now fully aware that Bush is a simpleton and a liar, and Republicans will pay heavily for this treason for decades. Funny that only two morons can be found to bolster Bushco’s lies and bloodlust.


  51. Exley Says:

    #48 GSD,

    I thought you folks believed in diplomacy and Sen. Obama’s assertion that we should talk not only with our friends but also our enemies.


  52. Lefty Patriot Says:

    I am sure he will remove the incorrect statement or issue a correction shortly.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 12:09 pm

    No correction needed, Exley, all the info that was necessary to show Bush a liar was available well over a year ago.


  53. Bullsmith Says:

    Amazing new low for political hackery reached by Joe Klein. Just when you thought he couldn’t be any more stupid and dishonest, Joe Klein finds a new sub-basement to his soul.


  54. Juan C. Says:

    We like bombing countries. It is the Western way to promote peace and freedom.


  55. Marcus Aurelius Says:

    The text of Bush’s letter to Kim Jong Il:

    Dear Kim, Exalted Leader and Love of My Life,

    My heart has already found it’s way you. I want you and no one else. You mean everything to me. I think we should try and make this work. You have to know you’re the one, and only one I want. Not only are you perfect for me, you’re the perfect friend and I hope we can and will be more. I could never ask for better then what we’ve had. I am hoping you’re feeling the same way because my heart is set on you, and only you, baby.

    Love Always,

    Your Admirer

    GWB

    P.S: Don’t let Dick see this.


  56. Badmoodman Says:

    Exley, what do you think of Bush exchanging love letters with Axis of Evil dictator Kim Jong Il?
    - - Talking is always better than chest-thumping. However, I’m guessing this was the real reason for Cheney’s recent abnormal heart palpatations and blowing off the WH holiday party. George and Dick are no longer BFFs.


  57. Bush Cover Ups Says:

    Hey Exley

    Ahmadinejad 1

    Bush 0


  58. DieNowForPeace Says:

    I thought you folks believed in diplomacy and Sen. Obama’s assertion that we should talk not only with our friends but also our enemies.

    Comment by Exley

    Oh we do dick-cheese, however it’s your favorite political party that prefers shooting first and asking questions later.


  59. gummitch Says:

    Maybe Satyam did not know that the ThinkFast section contained information that completely undermined his false assertion. But now he knows….I am sure he will remove the incorrect statement or issue a correction shortly.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 12:09 pm

    Or, maybe you need to read more, like the linked article.

    I’m sure your correction and apology are eagerly anticipated.


  60. Lefty Patriot Says:

    Exley, don’t forget to pick up your RNC check; you’ve earned it. maybe a bonus as well, for your willful ignorance and inability to tell truth from RNC lies. You’re a good little Nazi.


  61. Bush Cover Ups Says:

    British GCHQ eavesdropping played role in US intelligence U-turn on Iran

    The US intelligence U-turn on Iran was partly based on telephone conversations in Iran intercepted by the British intelligence listening station GCHQ, according to a source in Washington speaking on a basis of anonymity.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/ usa/ story/ 0,,2222750,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=12


  62. Bush Cover Ups Says:

    George Bush said on Tuesday that the decision to change the assessment was based on “a great discovery”. Diplomatic and official sources in the US said this was mainly based on human intelligence, almost certainly a major defector, but that intercepts were also a factor.


  63. A Patriot Acting Says:

    The desperation from the neocons is palpable these past few days. Bush candor? Get your shovels, Progs. If you thought the spin from the right (trolls included, natch) was building as of late, we will soon be waist deep in BS. They’ve got everyone of the neocons hitting as many media outlets as they possibly can to try to spin this report and distract away from our disingenuous leader and his war/power drunk cohort Dick Cheney. Remember, they have had months to come up with rationalizations and spin to work around these latest findings. They, along with their playmates in PNAC are a tiny minority in this nation but we should watch to see the full extent of their power and influence bubble to the surface in these, their most desperate of times. They know that their influence in American politics is slowly being dragged out into the light (thanks to those filthy blogs and the internets) and they will be grabbing for all they can with the time they have left. If you look closely at EVERY step this Administration has taken since day one, the only people who have stood to benefit are the neocons, PNAC and all their corporate bigwigs. Not ONE POLICY from this decider has been to the benefit of average Americans. These fascist thugs HATE the principles of our Democracy, our Constitution, and our system of government and have been raping and undermining it in full gear for the last seven years. I would be lying if I didn’t admit that I’mm more than a little fearful as to what this cabal of traitors and thieves have in store for us until Jan. 2009.


  64. hellinabucket Says:

    Thanks for the link gummitch. A notable nugget from the article:

    Former CIA officer Philip Giraldi provided a similar account, based on his own sources in the intelligence community. He told IPS that intelligence analysts have had to review and rewrite their findings three times, because of pressure from the White House.

    “The White House wants a document that it can use as evidence for its Iran policy,” says Giraldi. Despite pressures on them to change their dissenting conclusions, however, Giraldi says some analysts have refused to go along with conclusions that they believe are not supported by the evidence.

    In October 2006, Giraldi wrote in The American Conservative that the NIE on Iran had already been completed, but that Cheney’s office had objected to its findings on both the Iranian nuclear programme and Iran’s role in Iraq. The draft NIE did not conclude that there was confirming evidence that Iran was arming the Shiite insurgents in Iraq, according to Giraldi.

    Giraldi said the White House had decided to postpone any decision on the internal release of the NIE until after the November 2006 elections.

    Cheney’s desire for a “clean” NIE that could be used to support his aggressive policy toward Iran was apparently a major factor in the replacement of John Negroponte as director of national intelligence in early 2007.

    Negroponte had angered the neoconservatives in the administration by telling the press in April 2006 that the intelligence community believed that it would still be “a number of years off” before Iran would be “likely to have enough fissile material to assemble into or to put into a nuclear weapon, perhaps into the next decade.”


  65. An Outhouse Says:

    “He didn’t try to spin it to our advantage”

    Who is ‘our’? Is Joke a neocon now?


  66. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    Good work, Exley.

    Now, any reaction to the President’s lies to the American public?

    Or to Joke Line’s recasting lies as “candor”?


  67. Exley Says:

    Ummm, Gummitch, you do realize this IPS article is a month old and has been completely contradicted by the new information reported today by The New York Times (and passed along by ThinkProgress), don’t you?

    Oh, and Gummitch. did you know the author of the IPS article, Gareth Porter, denied that Pol Pot carried out any mass killing in Cambodia in the 1970s???? Now THERE’S a credible reporter…..

    You did know all this, didn’t you Gummitch?


  68. hellinabucket Says:

    Shooting the messanger huh Exley? Is Phillip Giraldi wrong?


  69. hellinabucket Says:

    That would mean the American Conservative is wrong as well.


  70. PaulD Says:

    The sky if falling! Take a look at how this neo-con apologist from The Weekly Standard gets cornered on the NIE report and tries to spin himself out of it. This is beautiful.

    VIDEO
    Chris Matthews Roasts a Neo-Con on Iran
    http://test.redlasso.com/ service/ svc/ clip/ playClip?fid=9fcb21ca-effa-40b8-aa36-8856d7b71ea4


  71. VerbalKint Says:

    Joe Klein acts for all the world like he is employed by the Bush administration. What have they got on this guy to blackmail him with, I wonder?


  72. Jackie Says:

    Joe has to earn the money he’s given by the White House. It’s his job to spin blame and even lie to make sure the idiot President looks good. This time it’s impossible but Joe must try. Bush out right lied and the World saw it. Now the American people could care less about how much Bush lies. But as we see the foreign countries have moved on and started building their economy yet the US is left out. Right now the White House is looking to save Republican loyalist from the sub prime problem. Yes contact your representative if you vote for a Republican cross dresser/Mob King name Rudy, Paulson will save your home. Look it’s all about votes for the GOP. Want your home saved vote for another idiot Republican,. if not lose your home. Just as Bush is blackmailing Congress with either give the 178 Billion dollars or Government jobs will be lost. Welcome to America.


  73. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    It’s been quite a couple of weeks for Joke Line, hasn’t it?

    First his column of Neocon stenography gets exposed as a pack of lies, forcing him to retreat to the excuse that he has “neither the time nor the expertise” to get his facts right, then he tries to spin a blatant presidential lie into “an amazing moment of candor”.

    Yeah. And the phone-jamming scandal in NH in ‘04 was “an impressive Get Out the Vote campaign”.


  74. Exley Says:

    HiB,

    What “messenger” am I “shooting?” I have simply pointed out that Satyam has posted an erroneous and false claim that is completely undermined by an article in today’s New York Times to which ThinkProgress itself has linked in today’s “ThinkFast” section.


  75. moondancer Says:

    Joke Line should do the honorable thing. When he is arguing in defense of bush with Scarborough taking the moderate/progressive stance, its time for Joke Line to embrace fox entertainment channel and his new bedmate Bob Novak. Even by village pundits standards,you really suck.


  76. gummitch Says:

    You did know all this, didn’t you Gummitch?

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 12:21 pm

    The fact that the Times is reporting the story differently does not prove the earlier story is wrong, Exley. Surely you understand that.

    And you knew that: “But in an appearance on The Today Show in August 1978, Porter agreed that the Khmer Rouge regime was guilty of mass killings and mass starvation. He reiterated that view in articles during the 1980s in The Guardian, The Nation, and Foreign Affairs among others.”

    You knew that, right?


  77. Juan C. Says:

    Watch this video. Don’t let this propaganda machine make you forget what is/was really going on:

    http://www.noticias.info/ video/ video_play_ES.asp?Id=vTGf4X_Qjew


  78. Namtillaku Says:

    Joe Klein, liberal pundit eh?

    I’m sure most of you have followed the ‘Joe Klein VS. Truth’ story over at Salon, but if you haven’t, it’s a perfect example of how the GOP uses the willing MSM to subvert truth and dupe americans. Check it out…

    http://www.salon.com/ opinion/ greenwald/ 2007/ 11/ 21/ klein/


  79. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    Again I find Exley’s strategy fascinating in its discipline and rigor. Never does he was waver from picking nits, thus accomplishing the strategic goal of avoiding the larger issue.

    Has Bush been lying to the American public for the past four months about the threat posed by Iran? Doesn’t matter. TP made an error of fact in its framing of the issue. THAT’s the real concern.

    Exley, your performance is almost sublime in its obtuseness.


  80. hellinabucket Says:

    Exley stated ” Ummm, Gummitch, you do realize this IPS article is a month old and has been completely contradicted by the new information reported today by The New York Times (and passed along by ThinkProgress), don’t you?

    The messanger is the ISP article and Giraldi. Who wrote this in the American Conservative.

    So what are you going to believe?


  81. tombaker Says:

    Amazing in that it constitutes admission of trerasonous guilt, maybe. That kind of confessional candor from these liars really would be amazing.


  82. Exley Says:

    Gummitch,

    1). The New York Times story is more recent and contains new information. It supercedes the month old IPS article.

    2) The IPS story is written by a discredited and obviously biased “journalist,” who once denied genocide in Cambodia. He is hardly a credible source.

    (Moreover, he cites among his “sources” Ray McGovern– a figure so vile that even Howard Dean has to apologize for when McGovern made bigoted remarks at a Democratic event).

    Satyam needs better sourcing for his now-discredited claim.

    (Oh, and yes, I give Porter all the credit in the world for his decision to stop defending Pol Pot and finally admitting what the rest of the world already knew)


  83. tombaker Says:

    Oh sweet Jesus - not Assley again.

    Ex- blow it out your piehole, babe. I will dog every thread you dare sully, and I will flame your liar ass all over this place until you just can’t stand it any longer.

    Your deceptions are of the lowest order, as are your motives, you sorry s.o.b.


  84. hellinabucket Says:

    On Oct. 17th Bush made the WWIII reference. Bush didn’t have the intelligence (pun intended) to back this. Irresponsible of him.


  85. Juan C. Says:

    So the President was caught lying and he is still the President?

    Check and balances is a requirement of a democracy…so when do US get to be bombed because of his lack of democracy?


  86. hellinabucket Says:

    Is Giraldi lying then Exley?


  87. kharma Says:

    I’m Sorry but they have some serious shit on Klein. You know this administration has been using it’s illegal surveillance technology to spy on and get dirt on our so-called journalists and pundits. Klein must have some serious skeletons in his closet–most likely some kind of sexual oddity.


  88. OxyCon Says:

    Joke Line is a true embarressment. WTF is wrong with him? Did he fall down the stairs and crack his skull open?

    And Bush is spinning the NIE to his favour, btw.


  89. Xisithrus Says:

    I can never hear anything Joe Klein says….-Zooey

    Thats what I fell like watching Bolton, that Mustachio bobbles around casting its spell, and I dont hear [or care] what the heck he said.


  90. Juan C. Says:

    Your deceptions are of the lowest order, as are your motives, you sorry s.o.b.
    Comment by tombaker

    Nahhh, it just getting more boring. He is the kind of person that after his mom has a car accident, asks: OMG! How’s the car?

    You know, he can be circumventing all he wants, nobody should care after he has been discredited so many many times.


  91. moondancer Says:

    Watch that video again- with the knowledge that Sy Hersh wrote about this NIE a YEAR ago. Then tell me that Joke Line is a reporter.


  92. texaslady Says:

    So Bush lied and we are surprised how ? It has been six years of lie upong lie this is the policy of the Bush/Cheney administration. We should be surprised if they every spoke the truth.


  93. tombaker Says:

    Your opinions are of as much interest to folks here as the details of your rectum - save both and take them to your proctologist for examination - the public is only repulsed by both.


  94. Exley Says:

    HiB,

    You haven’t provided Giraldi’s article, so I can’t really comment on it. I will say that anyone who writes for “The American Conservative” and antiwar.com — two extreme isolationist, anti-Israel forums — is hardly an objective figure.


  95. tombaker Says:

    Sanctimonious fraud.

    Spinbot.

    Historical revisionist.

    Quisling.

    4 synonyms for Exley


  96. tombaker Says:

    “hardly an objective figure” - Exley presents his own synonym for himself - nice.


  97. Lefty Patriot Says:

    Problem is, exlax, Ray McGovern has been proven right, over and over again. Your very typical off-center cheap shot should be reserved for idiots who don’t know the score, like CHL, bigfoot, and yourself.


  98. Exley Says:

    #79, Heh! Ralph, I find it amusing that you accuse me of being obtuse when I have conclusively and unassailably shown that Satyam’s statement about the NIE being held up a year is completely conttradicted by an article by ThinkProgress itself — and yet despite this complete and devstating undermining of Satyam’s false claim by his own Web site, you folks refuse to admit it. As I said, very amusing.


  99. sacopenapa Says:

    FACISM is amazing isn’t it? Where everybody see a traitor, a lier, a war criminal, these Facists followers see “a moment of candor”.


  100. tombaker Says:

    97 - rhetorical sleight of hand is Ex’s major M.O.. He’s quite impressed with himself in that regard, and snickers into his sleeve with every spun-to-fine-thread post he writes.


  101. tombaker Says:

    It’s his conceit and arrogance that make it nearly plausible that he is, in fact, Karl Rove - the most vain and arrogant man ever to survive High School.


  102. Exley Says:

    Yeah, Lefty, it’s a real “cheap shot” to cite a historical fact that even Howard Dean had to apologize for and disown McGovern’s bigoted remarks.

    Soory, Lefty, but when you state a fact, it is not a “cheap shot.” I am sorry you are so embarrassed by McGovern (you should be).


  103. Lefty Patriot Says:

    As I said, very amusing.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 12:52 pm

    Of course it’s amusing, as it’s irrelevant to the subject at hand, just another “look over there” moment to deflect from the lies of your reviled, sleazeball deserter-in-chief. You should be dealing with the treason at the top of the chain, not some bullshit spin that your masters have put up.


  104. Shayne Says:

    Again I find Exley’s strategy fascinating in its discipline and rigor. Never does he was waver from picking nits, thus accomplishing the strategic goal of avoiding the larger issue.

    Comment by ralph the wonder llama — December 6, 2007 @ 12:33 pm

    Really all that nitpicking must be what makes me think that he is an actual baboon instead of a pretend one.


  105. tombaker Says:

    While the “common” trolls like CHL and Bigfoot bide their time parroting Rush and searching for kernels of corn in the Master’s excreta, Exley sifts their leavings for the undigested caviar, thus making him “specially qualified”.


  106. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    #98 and Exley extends his performance with triple axel — asserting that his obtuseness is NOT obtuse because the minor debatable error of fact that he’s using to distract from the topic has NOT BEEN ADMITTED TO BY COMMENTERS!

    Damn, Exlax, when it comes to obtuseness, you got game.


  107. tombaker Says:

    he’s the Charles Emerson Winchester of Trolldom.

    and aren’t we all just really impressed with that distinction.


  108. Shayne Says:

    All knowing and powerfull troll Exley, since you believe you are the arbiter of what is truth and what is fiction TP will run every topic by you before they post it ok. Because obviously you read every effing article in the entire freaking world and are the only one able to decipher which ones are fact and which are fiction. It is only your opinion that matters to anybody anywhere any more. Now run along and await your assignment.


  109. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    Actually, at this point, I’d be disappointed if Exley said something substantial about Bush lying to the American public for four months about the threat from Iran, or about Joke Line calling those lies “an amazing moment of candor”.

    It would be like Marcel Marceau turning and speaking to the audience.


  110. Shayne Says:

    Is the dumbass Exlax gone? I’m not getting my hopes up.


  111. Shayne Says:

    Yeah too bad Exley is a clown instead of a mime.


  112. Xisithrus Says:

    Exley is about as good as Seixon was when it comes to verbal ice skating.


  113. Exley Says:

    “All knowing and powerfull troll Exley”

    Oh, Shayne, you DO flatter me….But no, I am not “all knowing and powerful.”

    I am just a man — Just an incredibly well-read and knowledgeable man with an encyclopedic understanding of political, legal and world affairs.


  114. VerbalKint Says:

    Does it really matter anymore Exley? Bush is a congenital liar, and most Americans realize that now. He is obviously lying about the NIE. But suppose for the sake of argument that he isn’t. Do you really think you have a snowball’s chance in hell of convincing anyone but the loyalists that he isn’t lying? He looks like he’s lying, he acts like he’s lying, he sounds like he’s lying, therefore he is lying. That’s the political calculus here.


  115. texaslady Says:

    Now how is Klein going to spin the fact that Bush said he only heard about this report last week when it was really in August? Boy, the spin makers must be working overtime.


  116. Xisithrus Says:

    Just an incredibly well-read and knowledgeable man with an encyclopedic understanding of political, legal and world affairs.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 1:08 pm

    Which undercuts your need for ’spin’ I would say Exley. And I may be wrong here, and if so I apologize, but when you spin, as such, it looks as if your paid to do so.


  117. Severus Says:

    Exley, I’ll spin this republican style…So the reporter denied that Pol Pot comitted Gennocide in the 1970’s (has the guy changed his mind since then?) anyhow, here’s the way republicans spin…Pol Pot did not comitt genocide he did not kill anyone. Rouge elements, bad apples if you will, within his administration did the killing. They were promptly punished because the Khhmer ROuge do not comitt genocide, it will not be tolserated! (they were then pardoned annd awarded the medal of freedom)


  118. Exley Says:

    “but when you spin, as such, it looks as if your paid to do so.

    Comment by Xisithrus — December 6, 2007 @ 1:11 pm”

    I wish!


  119. tombaker Says:

    …just a man, packed to the roof of the cranial vault with bullshit and self-love…….


  120. McE Says:

    Joe ‘corrects’ ThinkProgress:

    http://www.time-blog.com/ swampland/ 2007/ 12/ misinterpreted.html

    Misinterpreted
    Posted by Joe Klein | Comments (25) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This

    This is wrong.
    OBviously, I was referring to the NIE itself as a remarkable moment of candor for the United States. I thought that Bush’s reaction to it was, literally, incredible. As in, not to be believed–which was made completely clear in my cover story. Again, here’s the link to that story and here is my actual evaluation of Bush’s utter failure to respond intelligently to the report:

    The NIE represented another promising opportunity missed. Imagine if the President had said, “This report means we don’t want war. We want to talk, and everything — including lifting of the economic sanctions and our acknowledgment that you are a major regional power — is on the table so long as you put everything on the table too. That means not only your uranium-enrichment program but also your support for terrorist organizations.” How could Iran have said no to that?
    But that would have required some other President. This President appears to lack the desire, creativity and patience to engage in the most important diplomacy that a nation can face — with its enemies — over issues that could mean the difference between war and peace.


  121. deebaser Says:

    Now how is Klein going to spin the fact that Bush said he only heard about this report last week when it was really in August? Boy, the spin makers must be working overtime.

    Comment by texaslady — December 6, 2007 @ 1:09 pm
    ——————

    What did the president know, and when did he know it?


  122. tombaker Says:

    few people know that the reason so many lost their heads in the French Revolution was that the Revolutionaries had to listen to shills like exley hold forth on behalf of the Royals for so long.

    by the time they did attain power, they were so aggravated by years of listening to exley-ian bullshit they went berserk, jailing anyone who so much as resembled him.


  123. Shayne Says:

    I am just a man — Just an incredibly well-read and knowledgeable man with an encyclopedic understanding of political, legal and world affairs.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 1:08 pm

    That’s the opinion of you we all have too. Now run along.


  124. texaslady Says:

    The problem is the President’s lies and Bs are becoming the norm and the public isn’t outraged anymore. And you have his water carriers that will “explain” what he really mean’t to say.


  125. texaslady Says:

    Exley - if you are extremely well read why are you a Bush supporter?


  126. Shayne Says:

    Ironic that Exley fancies himself well-read with an understanding of all but he didn’t read the sarcasm in my tone or even recognize where I called him a baboon and a clown. Well read indeed.


  127. Lefty Patriot Says:

    I am just a man — Just an incredibly well-read and knowledgeable man with an encyclopedic understanding of political, legal and world affairs.

    Comment by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 1:08 pm

    no proof of that here, ever. Sounds like more of your lies and spin.


  128. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    #120 — thanks for that link. McE.

    I saw the clip, and I read the “explanation” and Joke Line is full of sh!t once again.

    it’s fairly obvious from the clip that he is saying the administration’s reaction to the NIE —

    The Bush reaction to this — he didn’t try to block it. He didn’t try to postpone it. He didn’t spend weeks, he didn’t ask the intelligence community ‘give me a couple of weeks, let’s see if we can figure out some kind of negotiating initiative or some way to respond to this.’ He didn’t try to spin it to our advantage. This is an amazing moment of candor by the United States.

    is what he was referring to. Nowhere in that clip did he say anything like the President’s reaction being “literally, incredible”. Maybe he misspoke, maybe TP helped him realize was a dumba$$ thing it was to say, especially on the heels of his FISA fcukup, but this swampland “clarification” is bullsh!t.


  129. Uncle Ho Says:

    Exlax; If you are so well read and knowledgeable, why do you support Bush? He is, without question, the absolute worst head of state on the world stage since Adolf Hitler.


  130. tombaker Says:

    Lie me a river Ex - god knows you’re up to it.


  131. Xisithrus Says:

    My understanding is greater than yours Exley ,,nanna nanna boo boo!
    [joking, schoolyard taunt=]


  132. Juan C. Says:

    Just an incredibly well-read and knowledgeable man with an encyclopedic understanding of political, legal and world affairs.
    Comment by Exley

    Heh.


  133. patooty Says:

    Candor: I call it a psychotic break myself.


  134. ForTruth Says:

    When you have to tell people how awesome your are, instead of just showing them, maybe you’re really not very awesome.


  135. RUCerious Says:

    Didn’t Joseph really mean a ‘mountain of nose candy’?


  136. RUCerious Says:

    I am just a man — Just an incredibly well-read and knowledgeable man with an encyclopedic understanding of political, legal and world affairs.
    Comic Relief by Exley — December 6, 2007 @ 1:08 pm

    There, that’s better.


  137. McE Says:

    #128 #120 — thanks for that link. McE.

    No problem, Mr Llama.

    The comments to his ‘correction’ on Swampland are entertaining, too.


  138. PatrioticLiberalChristian Says:

    I tend to believe that Exlax is, indeed, “well read”. I mean, the rest of us have “well read” his tendency toward obtuse, nitpicking, and minimizing posts.

    Either that or “well read” could mean that Exlax has “read a lot” - cereal boxes, kool-aid packages, all of the Dr. Suess and P.D. Eastman books, and “My Pet Goat” at least ten times.


  139. zuch Says:

    Karl Rove obtained pictures of Joe Klein (a/k/a/ Joke Line) facking a goat, and the maladministration has been threatening to publish these pictures if Joke Line doesn’t sing along to the maladministration’s Mighty Wurlitzer.

    Joke Line denies it, of course, but I have neither the time nor legal background to figure out who’s right. OTOH, I heard it from a reputable source of unblemished non-partisanship and reputation, so I’d be remiss in not passing this information on.

    FWIW, Joke Line’s most famous stunt (outside of the above-recounted activities) was to anonymously write a pile’o'crapola pice of fiction (so what’s new?)

    Cheers,


  140. spider Says:

    Joe Klein: Beyond Stupid.


  141. krazeeinjun Says:

    Your high priests of punditry hard at work America. I give you Wanker Emeritus Bullshitterus Joe Klein. Like the Bushevik cronies and the wrong-wingnuts, he’s rewarded and promoted for constantly being wrong about everything. The MSM can’t scrape the barrel much deeper when it employs the likes of Joke Klein.


  142. jimijazz Says:

    Joe Klein is such a Bush toady, it’s embarrassing. Trying to give Bush credit for something he had no chioice but to do. Sooner or later the NIE report was going to be leaked and Bush and Cheney knew it.


  143. dim wit Says:

    HEY KLEIN,

    THIS ISN’T WRONG.

    The video of YOU talking is right there, up at the top of this page.

    How are WE wrong?


  144. Diana Moneymaker Says:

    When the heck will Bush get impeached? It’s a freakin’ farse of a government.

    -Diana


  145. Zooey Says:

    When you have to tell people how awesome your are, instead of just showing them, maybe you’re really not very awesome.
    Comment by ForTruth — December 6, 2007 @ 1:40 pm

    Bingo.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
image
View Most Popular
image
image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
image
image image image
What We're About
image
image
Featured
image
image
Subscribe to the Progress Report