http://www.queerty.com/news/huckabee-may-have-lost-weight-but-hes-still-a-pig-20071210

After all, everybody knows that God hates fags.

/sarc off

Wow, sounds like LAFWH is talking about Republicans here.

No surprise, though. It’s the man with the beam in his eye, talking about the splinter in someone else’s. Go figure.

#21- thanks for the definition

# 26- Huckabee hasn’t avoided anything. He responded, explained his position, and is standing by his comments. Your comment means nothing and shows your lack of information on the issue.

# 27- Were you or anyone you know here 100 million years ago? Any scientist will admit that dating could be flawed and we are always making new findings. That is the wonder of science; we don’t have all the answers. Therefore, your argument is flawed.

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

/narf / snark /sound-of-pig-grunting.,

Attempting to rewrite history is never going to be 100% effective unless or until you have access to a “Memory Hole” — and if people like me have anything to say about it, you never will. You may not want to admit that you said such things, but it’s a matter of public record — just because you’re ashamed of the truth doesn’t make it any less true. Especially now that you’re running for President, perhaps you should take this as an object lesson in learning to consider the potential impact of your words before opening your pie-hole — because if you think the attention is too close for comfort now, you’re not ready for the White House.

Comment by rastaman — December 9, 2007 @ 1:15 pm

that question answers itself.

Lie

…WWJD?

You gotta love the internet. It used to be that only newspeople could do research on what people said but now anyone can do it. One would think that kind of exposure would cause these people to think before they opened their mouths, but apparently not.

Huckabee is a typical Republiscum that thinks the way out of a hole is to keep digging.

(source – bill o’reilly, “journalist”, fox news)

For the details, see:
“Reagan Debunked Huckabee’s AIDS Bigotry – in 1987.”

Yeah, they know. They also know that the majority of us will never check. Sadly, I think they’re right.

If these candidates,like Huckabee and many others like him do not answer questions with complete honestry now,then electing one of these sweet talkers can lead us to a mess later , when he or she get elected and have the power of presidency.

Today on ‘Meet The Press’ Giuliani was spinning on when asked about how his mistress expenses were paid by taxpayer when he was Mayor of New York ; he kept saying..his family was in danger,and he needed protection .but when asked by Tim Russert that your mistress was not known to public then…he kept spinning the story.

The same with Hillary who was spinning her story that she voted to consider half of Iran’s army as terrorists to put pressure on Iran to start peace talking…while in fact it was a vote for war.

We have to look and care for honesty now…or we will pay heavy price later…

Not in so many words, no, but here’s what you did say:

Actually, you wrote it. Twice. You write that “we need to… isolate the carriers” of AIDS. If that isn’t quarantine I don’t know what is. You go on to write that “(i)t’s difficult to understand” why we don’t.
You then go on to suggest that, rather than increasing the federal contribution to AIDS research and treatment, multimillionaire celebrities, such as Elizabeth Taylor (and) Madonna” should take up the slack.

Now, there’s a “man of God” for ya!