Savage: 90% of Nobel board is ‘into child pornography.’
By on Dec 13th, 2007 at 4:43 pm
Savage: 90% of Nobel board is ‘into child pornography.’
On his radio show yesterday, right-wing talker Michael Savage attacked former Vice President Al Gore’s recent Nobel Peace Prize, saying that it was awarded to him by “the socialist perverts in Norway.” “90 percent of the people on the Nobel Committee are into child pornography and molestation,” proclaimed Savage. Listen to it:
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
133 Responses to “Savage: 90% of Nobel board is ‘into child pornography.’”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
Reports
In depth studies on select topics
<
typical wingnut projection; Savage is clearly a pedophile, as well as a traitor.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:44 pmSure, Savage is nuts.
So is Al Gore.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:44 pmUh, you projecting much lately Savage, it seems that people that say things like that are maybe into things like that, me thinks.
Bush/Cheney/Savage
Hague Trials ‘09
Buck Fush
December 13th, 2007 at 4:45 pmWow! What a lying prick!
December 13th, 2007 at 4:46 pmSomeone is going to slap Savage with a slander suit sooner or later. He’s clearly certifiable, spouting this crap.
And Charles James Napier? So are you.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:46 pmThought this site made you sick, Charles?
Let me tell you, I do hope that it makes you very sick, very, very sick, like the flu or worse. Your mind is already sick.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:46 pmSavage is just batsh!t crazy. The fact that he actually has an audience and people agree with what he says is what is really scary and revolting
December 13th, 2007 at 4:47 pmHey, Michael–They’re not the ones with the gay pornstar name…
December 13th, 2007 at 4:48 pmIt is time to start taking these people down. There should be a serious price to pay for these exaggerations. (The typical response is that it is not serious, just a way to highlight that they are liberal.) Treat them the way that abortion doctors have been treated. Indeed, was it alright to list their addresses and note the ones that died? How about doing that with these guys?
December 13th, 2007 at 4:49 pmDoes he have proof or is he looking for a slander suit?
December 13th, 2007 at 4:50 pmAnother coffin-nailer working overtime.
Thanks, Mike.
Congratulations, Righties - there’s the face your side shows the “sensible and independent mainstream American public”
December 13th, 2007 at 4:51 pmCaptain?
December 13th, 2007 at 4:52 pmHendler?
Southern?
Charles?
there we go - Frank wants to “own it”.
perfect. good luck with that “silent majority” you Righties claim ownership of.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:53 pmSavage is consumed with thoughts of deviant sexual behavior. Run a check on his hard drive and he’d be in jail, where he could enjoy his sexual fantasies, for life.
He’s a violent sociopath and and closeted nutjob.
-GSD
December 13th, 2007 at 4:53 pmYeah. Who cares about the freedom of speech when Al Gore and socialists are insulted…
Comment by Frank M — December 13, 2007 @ 4:52 pm
Freedom of speech doesn’t cover lies, idiot. We have laws about slander and libel — you’re not allowed to simply make things up about other people, especially nasty vicious comments about their personal lives.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:54 pmFrank - He’s very free to say that as far as I’m concerned - the more and the louder the better. In fact, I’m going to buy something advertised on his show, to encourage him to say it more.
I also think you should say what he says, to everyone you know, as many times as you can.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:56 pmIs that why “Landmark Legal Foundation Nominates Rush Limbaugh for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize”?
http://www.prnewswire.com/ cgi-bin/ stories.pl?ACCT=ind_focus.story&STORY=/ www/ story/ 02-01-2007/ 0004518421&EDATE=THU+Feb+01+2007,+01:27+PM
December 13th, 2007 at 4:56 pmCharles Napier!
I loved you in Silence of the Lambs and The Blues Brothers!
Charles played the lead man of The Good Old Boys!
-GSD
December 13th, 2007 at 4:57 pmThou shalt not bear false witness.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:58 pmNo surprise to hear this from the ‘filthy mouth’ award winner.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:58 pmSavage is just batsh!t crazy. The fact that he actually has an audience and people agree with what he says is what is really scary and revolting
Comment by Blue Stater — December 13, 2007 @ 4:47 pm
I’m convinced that Savage has got a bet going on with somebody. How else to explain that everything he says is crazier than the last?
Either that, or he wants the coverage Imus got for his slurs about the Rutgers women’s basketball team. He just figures that if he says something outrageous enough, then SOMEBODY will pay attention. Unfortunately, he’s become so much of a clown that nobody will.
Pathetic, really.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:00 pmThe US is trying to remove a reference to 25-40% cuts in carbon pollution by 2020 for developed countries, which remained in the draft roadmap released by the UN yesterday.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:01 pmDear Mr. Savage,
Carl Sagan once said: “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” I agree. Please provide proof to back up your claims. If you can’t do that your claims are nothing more than slander.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:01 pm90% of quoted statistics are made up on the spot.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:02 pmNow that Savage has proven he’s ready for the big leagues, I expect that CNN or Fox will move him into a show competing directly with Glenn Beck, and together with Rush, Gibson, Hume, Kristol, Krauthammer, Cavuto, and O’Reilly they can complain loudly about how liberal the mass media is.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:02 pmWe all know if youre talking child porn and 90% demographics….
it can only be one thing.
Republican politicians in Washington….
Eh Trent ??? ahhhh?
December 13th, 2007 at 5:03 pmFrank M. free speech shouldn’t mean free from rational thought speech. Savage is just a fearmonger and a liar. He ignorantly insults a board that has been created to promote peace. All for what? Using Savage’s same twisted view on the world one could say that 95% of all republicans fantasize about sex with their fathers and the other 5% their mothers or pets. Now we both know those numbers aren’t actually that high but just saying it now has to be defended against.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:03 pmLet him slander all he wants. Eventually, he will hang himself.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:03 pmWho would have thought that there would be somebody on this planet who could make Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, and Malkin all look downright rational.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:04 pmYou’re absolutely right, in a way, Frank.
Let Savage Weiner shout his message from the highest rooftops. i’m sure he’ll win converts among the reasonable middle, right?
Tombaker has it right: Frank wants to own this.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:04 pmIf so then Fingers Foley could be President of Norway and the rest of the GOP could be honored for their actions of being perverts and hiring prostitutes. The Republican party would fit right in to Norway culture.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:04 pmIf they except drunks, idiots and killers then Bush and Cheney would fit right in.
Savage knows because that is where he sends his child porn.
P.S. Don’t drink Rockstar Beverage, it is made by Savages’ son.
-GSD
December 13th, 2007 at 5:07 pmI had to laugh when I read that Savage justified his insane accusation with “according to scientific studies.”
That alone could be a story, if the members of the Nobel committee submitted to a scientific study to determine if they were pedophiles. I wonder who would fund such a study? Something this bizarre wouldn’t even be valid for a doctoral dissertation.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:08 pmIt’s pretty clear that Savage only “knows” this because he hangs out in the same online chat rooms as those alleged child pornophiles.
And after all, everyone knows that 90% of reich wingnuts like Savage (and a few select trolls here) are into baby eating and Hitler worshipping.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:08 pmWe can throw around all the esoteric arguments we want. All someone like Frank reall understands or pays heed are things to the effect of:
“takes one to know one”
That would get his goat, but none of the other stuff would penetrate the iron box he keeps his mind in.
And that’s what makes Righties wrong. Always.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:09 pmSavage is a loud mouth, big whoop.Media matters gets their panties in a bunch of everything, and no one cares.
Now if they were to discuss liberal loud mouth talk show host and part time child pornographer Bernie Ward, it might be interesting and newsworthy. Mediamatters is such a joke. They don’t have a single article about kidlover Bernie Ward except for an article where Savage criticizes him. Apparently jesting about the liberal wimps at Nobel being child pornographers is somehow worse than actually *being* a child pornographer. Typical leftwing reasoning, makes no sense of course.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:09 pmbannanas
December 13th, 2007 at 5:10 pmdesperate overstretch there, long name guy.
turdblossom’s proud of you nonetheless
December 13th, 2007 at 5:12 pmGod. That’s just disgusting.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:12 pmIs he really a jew?
Can jews be that facist? It doesnt seem possible?
His audience has to be 50% white supremacist / aryan nation. wtf?
December 13th, 2007 at 5:13 pmIt’s ok Frank - you and Savage can insult those things, too. Go ahead.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:14 pm#16: Don’t insult the God, country or family. Everything else goes.
Comment by Frank M — December 13, 2007 @ 5:12 pm
According to scientific studies, Frank M has sex with goats.
Billy goats.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:15 pmSavage can state and say any stastics he likes…because he creates them as he talks.
These people like Savage never abide by any rule,by data,by statsitcs,correlation etc. to prove or provide any facts,when they are on the air.
They just lash at anyone disagrees with their point of view,and they are paid to do this.
They are probably getting promotions and pay raise when they do this, just like Glenn Peck and others.
They are paid probably on pay/Insult ratio contract.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:15 pmSure, Savage is nuts.
So is Al Gore.
Comment by Charles James Napier — December 13, 2007 @ 4:44 pm
Sounds like you must be judging Former Vice-President Gore using the same type of “latest scientific studies” that Michael “Savage” Weiner made up for his pronouncements on the Nobel Prize Board.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:16 pmCharles Napier!
I loved you in Silence of the Lambs and The Blues Brothers!
Yeah. Lead singer and driver of the Winnebago of the ‘Good Ole Boys’. “We play both kinds of music here at Bob’s Country Bunker - Country & Western”.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:18 pmIf Michael (Savage) Weiner (hey, fans of his, you know that’s his real last name, don’t you? it’s true) has any actual proof for his statements, then he should tell us where we can find them. What frightens me is that he has the third highest rated radio talk show in the country. Further proof that you don’t have to be right to be popular.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:18 pmre 43:
hitler was jewish. it’s called self-loathing. Like larry craig really is gay. and george bush really is a coward. and tom delay was big government. And fox news really is msm.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:18 pmFrank,
Bush is not the country, unless you actually believe he is king….idiot
December 13th, 2007 at 5:21 pmThink about a liberal media radio host who said 90% of British politicians who went alomg with the Iraq invasion were into child porn…
think about it if Randi or Rachel or Sam Seder or Franken said that….
Think that would get a bit of coverage in the MSM?
Its not only taken for granted that repukes can and do say this thing…. but its OK for them to say it….
its cool for repubs to slander and viciously attack….
and then right wingnuts and Bush C@cksuckers like Punkinhead and Tweety say how “uncivil” the liberal blogosphere has become”
December 13th, 2007 at 5:22 pm#45: The President is this country. Feel good about attacking our country? I bet you do - liberals always do.
#46: Feel free to exercise your precious right to free speech.
Comment by Frank M — December 13, 2007 @ 5:18 pm
Frank M, proud of his ignorance. Only a wingnut can come up with somethong as completely wrong and unAmerican as the president is this country. if that’s the case, it’s now onder this country is the laughing-stock of the entire world, and is being sold to China a piece at a time. the president is this country, and this country is shit.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:24 pmThe President is this country? Every President? So, how about all those Republicanics who attacked Bill Clinton - were they attacking our country and feeling good about it?
The President is NOT this country. The Constitution and laws are this country. The people, as a whole - diverse and different, are this country. The values of individual freedom and accompanying responsibility are this country. Thus, THIS President is most definitely NOT this country.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:24 pmany president is the employee of this country
nothing more
i’ve never heard a real conservative or an honest republican talk the kind of nonsense Frank is treating us to.
this is really where moderators should should step in, rather than letting another thread descend into incoherent nonsense.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:25 pmThe President is this country. Feel good about attacking our country? I bet you do - liberals always do.
Comment by Frank M — December 13, 2007 @ 5:18 pm
Not much more need be said.
Frank M: Still not cutting it.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:25 pmBetter trolls please!
Mediamatters is such a joke. They don’t have a single article about kidlover Bernie Ward except for an article where Savage criticizes him.
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
Your ignorance is shining through, once again. Media Matters for America has as its mission to combat conservative misinformation in the media. You guys have all of right-wing talk radio out there spreading lies and misinformation about liberals and progressives. It’s because of people like Weiner (and Hannity and Limbaugh) that people still believe lies like “Saddam still had WMD in 2002″, “Saddam was working with al Qaeda” (not supporting terrorists ingerenal, but al Qaeda specifically) and “Iraq was involved with 9/11″. Conservative talk radio has done a tremendous disservice to this great country of ours. But to them, it’s no big deal, because they were able to make money off it.
So please stop bringing up the idiotic straw man arguments for which you are rapidly becoming famous.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:26 pm#45: The President is this country. Feel good about attacking our country? I bet you do - liberals always do.
#46: Feel free to exercise your precious right to free speech.
Comment by Frank M
Your rants are childish and juvenile. The president is this country? No, he is our employee. WE THE PEOPLE ARE THIS COUNTRY. Not the temporary squatter in the WH. Let’s get that straight right away.
Your reverence for the fool in the WH is YOUR problem, not ours. Very shortly, he will be gone and you will have nobody to worship - except folks like Savage.
Frank, frank, frank…When will you ever learn. You have strapped your wagon to a loser - pure and simple. In those lonely and dark places of your mind, you already know this though don’t you? That is why you are getting rather vile in your posts. You used to have a small amount of sanity which we could engage - but no more. It’s all self inflicted hate and loathing. I would suggest therapy. Maybe you and W could get a bulk rate. Check into it. Please.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:26 pmDon’t forget–Bush is not really President. So the title of Worst President Everâ„¢ technically escapes him.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:29 pmSatan must be so very proud of his beloved son, Michael WeinerSavage.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:30 pm#45: The President is this country. Feel good about attacking our country? I bet you do - liberals always do.
Comment by Frank M — December 13, 2007 @ 5:18 pm
The “pResident” is a TRAITOROUS boil on the azs of this country.
He is NOT the USA. He is a TREASONOUS scumback COXUCKER punk.
I am not attacking this country.
I am attacking its PRIMARY ENEMY, an AWOL coward TRAITOR named George W. Bush.
Only goose-stepping azs-lickers of the TRAITOR Bush, like YOU, would think otherwise.
REAL Americans do not, and KNOW that Bush is a TRAITOR.
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
P.S. I bet you would have said the SAME when Clinton was President, RIGHT?
You goose-steppers with the Jackboots always do…
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
December 13th, 2007 at 5:30 pm“Think about a liberal media radio host who said 90% of British politicians who went alomg with the Iraq invasion were into child porn…”
(good point - i agree with that post, and I add; moreover:)
The thing is, we never have to think about that, because they never do it. They also never hesitate to critique a Democrat’s position on an issue. They are fair, in a simple and straightforward way.
Sensibly-minded, independent-identifying, mainstream Americans DO NOT identify with Righty media-screechers (who only screech), and they ARE NOT alienated, by the sensible, classy, and witty dialogue Lefty media DOES ACTUALLY foster.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:31 pm-=GORE: BUSH BLOCKS BALI INTENTIONALLY=-
December 13th, 2007 at 5:32 pmDid I mention that Michael Savage is OBSESSED with gay sex?
OBSESSED I say.
-GSD
December 13th, 2007 at 5:32 pmNow if they were to discuss liberal loud mouth talk show host and part time child pornographer Bernie Ward, it might be interesting and newsworthy. Mediamatters is such a joke. They don’t have a single article about kidlover Bernie Ward except for an article where Savage criticizes him. Apparently jesting about the liberal wimps at Nobel being child pornographers is somehow worse than actually *being* a child pornographer. Typical leftwing reasoning, makes no sense of course.
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
I’ve never even heard of Bernie Ward until you brought him up. Can you provide us with a link to verifiable proof that he’s a “part time child pornographer”, BESIDES the MM article about Savage Weiner? Can Savage Weiner, or you, provide a link to those “latest scientific studies” that say that 90% of the Nobel Prize Board are child pornographers?
Can you provide a link that would prove to anyone that YOU’RE not a child pornographer, part-time or otherwise? Because, according to you and Mr. Weiner, I can stand up and tell the world that you’re a dick-smoking child pornographer, full-time, and the latest scientific studies will back me up. Right after this word from our sponsors.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:37 pmMr ShockJock Mickey the Thavage has every right to slander and libel anyone he wants. He just needs to understand that along with the right of free speech comes the responsibilty to live up to the consequences.
That said, he’s a bigoted, closeted, S&M monkey fu(ker.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:38 pmI’ve never even heard of Bernie Ward until you brought him up. Can you provide us with a link to verifiable proof that he’s a “part time child pornographerâ€, BESIDES the MM article about Savage Weiner? Can Savage Weiner, or you, provide a link to those “latest scientific studies†that say that 90% of the Nobel Prize Board are child pornographers?
Comment by Jane E. Schneider — December 13, 2007 @ 5:37 pm
Well, Bernie Ward has been charged with distributing child porn.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:40 pmComment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
Jane, you know this moron is a kid-rapist and molester, it’s obvious from his speech patterns and name. He’s just trying to throw us off the track, but we know that he’s another in a long line of GOP pedophiles, rapists and perverts; it’s a requirement these days.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:41 pm45: The President is this country..
Uhn, Nope, Francine, he’s not. Not my country, FU(K NO.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:41 pmWayne A. Schneider,
I understand that you might be frustrated that consumers consistently reject left wing radio talk shows. Perhaps if the left developed a sense of humor instead of spewing seathing hatred about Bush, then people *might* listen. Meanwhile, in the free market, liberalism continues to loose. Folks like the funders of Mediamatters, AirAmerica, etc have to pay to force their dark message out, where as the right wing radio is a thriving profit center.
My point, however, was that the only article on media maters about kidlover Bernia Ward was an article where Savage criticized him. That’s just funny to me, since it seems that mocking leftists is more serious to them than actually being a child pornographer. (or is it just that it is ok to be a kiddie porner if you’re a committed leftist?…either way is a bit pathetic)
December 13th, 2007 at 5:42 pmComment by RUCerious — December 13, 2007 @ 5:38 pm
Poor monkey.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:42 pmSeveral years ago, I was in the middle of nowhere and picked up this kook on the radio. He was blathering about “short haired women taking over the world”. I just figured it was a bit, but, their wasn’t any punchline.
After about three minutes I came to the conclusion that someone got drunk and took over a local, small town, AM station. Alas, he was their biggest syndicated show.
This guy either has a, sick, twisted sense of humor or he’s a psycho. Or both.
I find it incredible he hasn’t said enough to get himself booted on decency grounds. I would like to see a list of stations which have dropped him.
I don’t think there’s much hope for anyone who thinks his positions serve as any kind of moral guide. Unless your a “Rush-bot”, or worse, you won’t see any benefit to defending his message. He’s scum.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:43 pmComment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
You’re a riot. The “left” has no sense of humor? That would explain the hordes of conservative comedians and successful conservative comedy shows. Like that thing that bombed on Fox.
You’re pretty funny, but only because you’re so ridiculous. If you were a parody, you’d be worth a laugh, but you appear to be serious.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:45 pmPoor monkey.
Comment by hellinabucket — December 13, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
PETA just called, said I’d better watch my ass…
December 13th, 2007 at 5:46 pmComment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
And my point was that you know nothing about Media Matters and should not complain about what they do or do not cover. Try answering to that, instead of bringing up my alleged frustration with liberal media. Do you even know how to discuss a topic without making straw man arguments?
December 13th, 2007 at 5:47 pmDo you even know how to discuss a topic without making straw man arguments?
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider — December 13, 2007 @ 5:47 pm
Uh, that would be a big ass negatory, Wayne…
December 13th, 2007 at 5:52 pmComment by gummitch — December 13, 2007 @ 5:40 pm
Thank you, gummitch, for providing some of the information that I asked of CWIAD. As I said, I never heard of Ward, so I’m obviously not a fan of his, and I find his behavior disgusting. Just as any human, whether liberal or conservative, should.
So, CWIAD, you still need to explain why you believe that ALL liberal/progressives think that “jesting about the liberal wimps at Nobel being child pornographers is somehow worse than actually *being* a child pornographer. Typical leftwing reasoning, makes no sense of course.”
BTW, Weiner wasn’t “jesting”, and you know that as well as I do.
December 13th, 2007 at 5:55 pmSounds like slander to me
December 13th, 2007 at 5:56 pmBTW, Weiner wasn’t “jestingâ€, and you know that as well as I do.
Comment by Jane E. Schneider — December 13, 2007 @ 5:55 pm
That’s always the excuse. “You libs just don’t have a sense of humor. Rush/Ann/Savage/Bush was just joking!”
December 13th, 2007 at 5:59 pmIt’s socially wrong for someone with a platform like Wiener Savage to make these kinds of charges without backing it up. Being into child porn is a crime. I would like to see this freak substantiate accusations like that.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:00 pm77 - Doc - no doubt slander, which is why I’m encouraging all the Righties to take up his cause, and “shine the (icky) light” of his (icky)wisdom to as big an audience (of sane people) as possible.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:00 pmThis is not a joke - what a bullsh!t copout. Don’t even try it.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:01 pmHave you noticed that Ann Coulter has faded from the limelight? - she’s made a pariah of herself, as Savage will, and the more they all can be hastened down that path, the better.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:02 pmAnd every time they do it individually, they do it by degree to the overall righty enterprise.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:02 pmSavage obviously didnt pass journalism 101.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:03 pmIf any of the actual Nobel committee want to sue, they should, and I’d hope they could, and recover damages. Don’t anyone get me wrong here….
December 13th, 2007 at 6:03 pmWayne,
If you’d like me to agree with you that medimatter is a partisan site that only attacks conservatives, then sure, I agree with you.
You have to also agree with me that its ironic that kiddlover Bernie Ward, a liberal media figure, is also mentioned on media matters, but only in an article attacking Savage for criticizing Ward. Its just funny!
gummitch
Good try, but I was referencing conservative talk radio formats vs. liberal talk radio formats. AirAmerica is horribly depressing and lacks any sense of fun or humor. NO one listens to that.
Yes, I freely admit that many commedians are left-leaning, and they are sometimes pretty funny. The difference is that we on the right generally don’t hold up entertainers and celebrities as our intellectual spokespeople.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:05 pmThat’s always the excuse. “You libs just don’t have a sense of humor. Rush/Ann/Savage/Bush was just joking!â€
Comment by gummitch — December 13, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
I was “debating” with a right-wing friend of mine about taking Iranian threats against Isreal seriously enough to bomb them. I asked him if Muslims shouldn’t take just as seriously stuff like Ann Coulter’s “We should invade, kill and convert them” line.
His response? You guessed it. “She was only joking!” I sent him the link to her Sept. 13, 2001 column in NRO, where she originally said those words, and asked him to delineate for me exactly where in that piece she stopped being serious and switched to joking.
I never got a response.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:07 pmWow, I’m goin’ to Norway right away and get me one of them piece prizes.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:07 pmYes, I freely admit that many commedians are left-leaning, and they are sometimes pretty funny. The difference is that we on the right generally don’t hold up entertainers and celebrities as our intellectual spokespeople.
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 6:05 pm
Rush? Coulter?
You’re joking, right? This is one of those right wing funnies?
December 13th, 2007 at 6:08 pmBetter trolls please!
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — December 13, 2007 @ 5:25 pm
chuck, frank m… they’re the same person.
cold_hard_left is a housewife living in red hook, nj. posting comments is just one of her hobbies.
the real question we face is:
December 13th, 2007 at 6:09 pmwhere are the new trolls of tomorrow coming from today?
86 - Nor do you hold out Intellectuals as intellectual spokespeople - just aging MassComm majors with lots of hairspray on and no sense of humor.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:09 pmHave you noticed that Ann Coulter has faded from the limelight? - she’s made a pariah of herself, as Savage will, and the more they all can be hastened down that path, the better.
Comment by tombaker — December 13, 2007 @ 6:02 pm
She’s only really visible when she’s flogging one of her books. Plus, she spilled something nasty on her little black dress and has to wait until the dry cleaner can get to it.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:10 pmHey Frank M: Your president sucks and your god sucks. There you go. Now go have a good cry.
And, for good measure, here’s Michael Weiner Savage’s little postcard to Allen Ginsberg:
“Dear Allen Ginsberg,
December 13th, 2007 at 6:11 pmWatched a tourist from New Zealand taking pictures of Fijian people in the marketplace thought of inserting my cameras lens in your A hole to photograph the walls of your rectum.
I really do apologize But the thought did occur.
Michael Weinerâ€
You have to also agree with me that its ironic that kiddlover Bernie Ward, a liberal media figure, is also mentioned on media matters, but only in an article attacking Savage for criticizing Ward. Its just funny!
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 6:05 pm
Why is that funny? What has Bernie Ward done to draw the attention of mediamatters?
Mediamatters is NOT a news site. It is a media watchdog. it monitors and exposes conservative misinformation, and does it quite well. It focuses pretty closely on what people in the media SAY. It doesn’t attack Bill O’Reilly, for instance, for his proclivity to sexually harrass co-workers. It only deals with the content of his radio and TV show.
So, now that you understand what mediamatters does, maybe you can explain again, what has Bernie Ward done to draw the attention of mediamatters?
I mean, aside from offering you a convenient distraction from the embarrassment of having Michael Savage speak for your side.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:12 pmI understand that you might be frustrated that consumers consistently reject left wing radio talk shows. -CWIAD
I dont see that what Savage says is political. Its alot like Howard Sterns shock jock show and highly UN-informative
I guess some people think such vulgarity is funny. Frankly I find it alot like fart jokes and after about 15 minutes of such baseless crude and untrue bile spewing its time to tune it out.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:13 pmgummitch
December 13th, 2007 at 6:19 pmAgain you miss the point, something you appear to have a talent for.
While I agree Rush is formost an entertainer, comparing right wing radio commentators with folks like Chris Rock is kind of a stretch. But, you may have a point. Perhaps it is just that the outspoken leftwing celebrities, like Rosie Odonnel for example, tend to be outrageously uninformed.
Here is a list of people in the Republican Pervert Party-I shortened it for obvious reasons, if you want to know what they were, like senator and the like, google up- republican perverts and you will get the entire list.
Donald Fleischman was charged with two counts of child enticement, two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a child and a single charge of exposing himself to a child.
John David Roy Atchison was arrested for soliciting sex from a 5-year old girl.
John Bryan he had molested three girls, including two of his adopted daughters, ages 12 and 15.
Ted Klaudt was charged with raping girls under the age of 16.
Joseph Monteleone Jr. was found guilty of fondling underage girls.
Jeffrey Nielsen was arrested for having sex with a 14-year old boy.
Patrick Lee McGuire molesting girls between the ages of 8 and 13.
Larry Corrigan was soliciting sex from 13-year old girls.
Jeffrey Kyle Randall was molesting two boys — ages ten and 12.
Brent Schepp was molesting a 14-year old girl.
Mark Fole “sexually explicit” emails.
Randall Casseday soliciting sex from a 13-year old girl. Lou Beres molesting a 13-year old girl.
Larry Dale Floyd soliciting sex from an 8-year old girl. Mark Pazuhanich fondling a 10-year old girl.
Bobby Stumbo sex with a 5-year old boy.
Tom Randall molesting two girls under the age of 14.
Armando Tebano fondling a 14-year-old girl.
John Collins sexually molesting 13 and 14 year old girls.
Mark Seidensticker child molester.
Philip Giordano sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
Tom Adams distributing child pornography over the internet.
John Bryan molested three girls, including two of his adopted daughters, ages 12 and 15.
Ted Klaudt raping girls under the age of 16.
Joseph Monteleone Jr. fondling underage girls.
John Gosek soliciting sex from two 15-year old girls.
David Swartz molesting two girls under the age of 11.
Edison Misla Aldarondo raping his daughter.
John R. Curtin molesting an underage teenage boy.
Howard Scott Heldreth child rapist.
Dennis L. Rader sexual act on an 11-year old girl he murdered.
Nicholas Morency possessing child pornography.
Tom Shortridge taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
Mike Hintz sexual affair with a female juvenile.
Peter Dibble inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.
Carey Lee Cramer molesting two 8-year old girls.
Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
Donald “Buz” Lukens sex with a female minor.
Richard A. Delgaudio child porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.
Mark A. Grethen six counts of sex crimes involving children.
Randal David Ankeney sexual assault on a child.
Dan Crane sex with a female minor.
Beverly Russell ncestuous relationship with his step daughter.
Judge Ronald C. Kline child pornography on his home computer.
Robert Bauman sex with a 16-year-old boy.
Jeffrey Patti distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
Marty Glickman unlawful sexual activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.
Howard L. Brooks molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
John Hathaway sex with his 12-year old baby sitter.
Stephen White offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
Jon Matthews exposing his genitals to an 11 year old girl.
Earl “Butch” Kimmerling molesting an 8-year old gir.
Paul Ingram six counts of raping his daughters.
Kevin Coan soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.
Andrew Buhr first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
Keith Westmoreland seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 .
John Allen Burt molesting a 15-year old girl.
Keola Childs molesting a male child.
John Butler sexual assault on a teenage girl.
Richard Gardner molesting his two daughters.
Marine Jack W. Gardner molesting a 13-year old girl.
Merrill Robert Barter unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.
Fred C. Smeltzer, Jr. raping a 15 year-old girl.
Parker J. Bena possession of child pornography on his home computer.
Larry Jack Schwarz, child pornography was found in his possession.
Robin Vanderwall five counts of soliciting sex from boys and girls over the internet.
Mark Harris, sex with an 11-year-old girl.
Steve Aiken sex with two underage girls.
Nicholas Elizondo molested his 6-year old daughter.
Russell Harding possessing child pornography on his computer.
Richard A. Dasen Sr.raping a 15-year old girl.
Family values at work.
Buck Fush
December 13th, 2007 at 6:20 pm“You have to also agree with me that its ironic that kiddlover Bernie Ward, a liberal media figure, is also mentioned on media matters, but only in an article attacking Savage for criticizing Ward. Its just funny!”
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 6:05 pm
Did you pass Reading Comprehension, are are you just deliberately stupid? As Wayne told you, and as MediaMatters’ website clearly states, MM’s purpose is to expose the right-wing’s lies. Therefore, NO ONE would agree with you that it’s ironic, or funny, that MM has never mentioned Bernie Ward in any other context than the article about Weiner. Can you understand that?
Regardless, both Wayne and I have had enough of you. I know that you probably never intended to respond to the other questions I posed to you earlier, so don’t waste your tiny little mind trying.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:22 pmAgain you miss the point, something you appear to have a talent for.
While I agree Rush is formost an entertainer, comparing right wing radio commentators with folks like Chris Rock is kind of a stretch. But, you may have a point. Perhaps it is just that the outspoken leftwing celebrities, like Rosie Odonnel for example, tend to be outrageously uninformed.
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 6:19 pm
You’re the one missing the point. Who the hell ever gave Chris Rock any credence? Or Rosie? Just because these people mouth off, and the media gives them a forum to do so doesn’t mean anyone on the Left pays any attention at all. It’s mouth-breathing conservatives that confuse “entertainers” like Rush with sources of information.
And if you’re looking for “outrageously uninformed” you can stay closer to home: Hannity, O’Reilly, Beck, Savage - the list is pretty much endless.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:25 pm“So, now that you understand what mediamatters does…”
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — December 13, 2007 @ 6:12 pm
Ralph, you’re giving him too much credit.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:25 pmClinton-hater: “The difference is that we on the right generally don’t hold up entertainers and celebrities as our intellectual spokespeople.”
You’ve got one running for president, dumbass.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:26 pmPerhaps it is just that the outspoken leftwing celebrities, like Rosie Odonnel for example, tend to be outrageously uninformed.
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 6:19 pm
Unlike Rush “Neocon means Jews” Limbaugh. or Bill “Paris Business Review” O’Reilly. Or Michael “90% of the Nobel committee are pedophiles” Savage Wiener.
Right. Uninformed. Good point.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:26 pmHey “ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred”: Just a little reminder. The week Clinton was impeached, Gallup had his approval rating at 73%.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:28 pmMore uninformed that the White House Press Secretary?
I’ll bet you ten bucks that even Rosie knows what “the Cuban Missile Crisis” was.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:31 pmYou’ve got one running for president, dumbass.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — December 13, 2007 @ 6:26 pm
Heh. Good point.
Another one was their mostest favorite president of all time.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:31 pmAccording to scientific studies, Frank M has sex with goats.
Billy goats.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — December 13, 2007 @ 5:15 pm
You mean Billy Hill is a goat?
December 13th, 2007 at 6:39 pmgummitch
Did you miss when Chris Rock was giving “commentary” on Bush at the Obama event? I’ll see if I can find it on youtube. And Rosie is really not doing much for the left’s image. She still thinks that 911 was an inside job by Bush and Co. How rediculously insaine.
Sure, GOP has thompson runing. I am no republican, and I don’t support him. But, at least he’s informed. Although some celebrities on the left sound so dumb and naive when they speak about politics, although perhaps you don’t recognize that about them. I am specifically talking about folks like susan sarandon, tim robbins, sean penn, harry belefonte, etc. Those people are not doing your side any favors. I have to admit, neither is Culter doing our side any favors, she’s too mean for my taste. However, again the difference is that she is quite informed on politics and she’s famous for being political commentator, not just commenting on political issues because she’s famous.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:41 pmCWIAD is one of those “Independents” that R’s have been mass-morphing into….
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that is a WHOPPER, boy.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:43 pmsomebody get this kid a tootsie-pop wrapper hat.
HFS! - I had coffee squirt out my nose!! ouch!, btw…
December 13th, 2007 at 6:44 pmCrazy Clinton-hater: “But, at least he’s informed.”
Yes, Fred is SO informed that he thinks that the temperature changes on MARS has something to do with our planet’s climate change.
Crazy Clinton-hater: “I am specifically talking about folks like susan sarandon, tim robbins, sean penn, harry belefonte, etc.”
Yes, all of these people are concerned with economic justice and the health of our working class. All of them were against the invasion of Iraq. All of them think Americans should all have decent healthcare and good wages. Sure, to a crazy guy, this sounds crazy.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:47 pmClinton-hater, you’re deranged. Sarandon, Robbins, sean penn are very well informed on political matters. Just because their conclusions don’t match yours doesn’t mean they’re uninformed. Your accusations of such just mean that you’re not prepared to debate their points. just like you’re not prepared to really debate points here. They’re at least as informed as Ann Coulter, who claimed once that John Kerry owed more of his success to his family connections than George W. Bush. And they’re a lot less vulgar.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:47 pm#111: Once again, you said it better than I did, Colonel.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:48 pmCrazy Clinton-hater: “I support Bush and all of his programs, but I am no republican.” Sure, crazy Clinton-hater, sure.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:49 pmRalph, I’m just happy to be close to your wavelength.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:51 pmComment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 6:05 pm
Did you know that the founder, David Brock, of Media Matters was a CONSERVATIVE journalist before he got fed up and started the site. No you wouldn’t bother to know the facts, that’s a progressive thing.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:53 pmHey Crazy Clinton-hater: I saw Sean Penn renting boats and rescuing people and dogs from the Katrina disaster. I heard Savage call Katrina victims “animals.” You stick with Savage. I’m very proud to be on Penn’s side.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:54 pmHowever, again the difference is that she is quite informed on politics and she’s famous for being political commentator, not just commenting on political issues because she’s famous.
Comment by ClintonWasImpeachedAndDisbarred — December 13, 2007 @ 6:41 pm
Sure anybody who agrees with your myopic vision is informed. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Got it, jackass. Come back when you get a clue.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:56 pmYou mean Billy Hill is a goat?
Comment by Shayne
Goats love to find an elevated perch from which to survey their domain. From what I gather of this poster, I imagine his trailer perched on a barren dirt hillside, where every last shred of vegetation has long since been eaten, and even the junk cars have had the tires gnawed down to the steel belting.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:04 pmSure, Crazy Clinton-hater, Ann Coulter is your gal. And, as you say, she’s quite a political commentator. Just your style.
Ann Coulter’s well-thought out response to 9-11: “We should invade their countries and convert them to christianity or kill them all.”
Ann Coulter’s highly intelligent appraisal of John Edwards: “He’s a fag.”
Like I said, Crazy Clinton-hater, just your style.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:12 pm“Did you know that the founder, David Brock, of Media Matters was a CONSERVATIVE journalist before he got fed up and started the site.”
Comment by Shayne — December 13, 2007 @ 6:53 pm
Perhaps we should recommend Brock’s book, “The Republican Noise Machine” for CWIAD’s reading list?
December 13th, 2007 at 7:12 pmFrom what I gather of this poster, I imagine his trailer perched on a barren dirt hillside, where every last shred of vegetation has long since been eaten, and even the junk cars have had the tires gnawed down to the steel belting.
Comment by Nevar — December 13, 2007 @ 7:04
It’s nice when somebody shares my vision.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:14 pmI look forward to the response of the nuts if Rachel Maddow has a prime-time show before the election.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:15 pmAnd before “Noise Machine,” he wrote an account of his time working for the right wing called “Blinded by the Right.” It’s a hoot. Turns out Matt Drudge hit on him and Laura Ingraham got so drunk at a conservative cocktail party that she was crawling around on her hands and knees complaining that she wanted to DO Brock but he was gay. He nicely chronicles what a sick bunch they all are.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:18 pmI think the Crazy Clinton-hater had to take another oxycontin, lay down and have a good cry.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:27 pmCrazy Clinton hater has to take that oxycontin now so he can take his nap and then gobble up his viagra until he goes deaf as well as being dumb and blind to the facts.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:29 pmHas anyone asked or demanded that Michael Savage prove or attempt to document the charges?
December 13th, 2007 at 7:44 pm“perverts and child molesters”? I think he got his geography wrong. What he meant to say is that it’s the GOP which is rife with perverts, pervert enablers, and child molesters. See new Congressional Page scandal which was just aired today.
December 13th, 2007 at 7:47 pmApparently, one of the Nobel Committee members is only half a pedophile since there are only 5 members on the committee.
http://nobelpeaceprize.org/eng_com_five.html
I’m sure Frank M will counter by saying that the website is not reputable because their a bunch of pedophiles.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:04 pmBush is not the country, unless you actually believe he is king….idiot
Comment by Bobwurst
He’s not the Country but the Country is his as is the Government. He often refers to “his country” and “his government” like he owns them.
Bush, too, is certifiable.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:04 pmImus has stepped in it (again) already.
“You say you don’t like Huckabee? What are you, gay, or something?â€
reported on countdown minutes ago
December 13th, 2007 at 8:29 pmAnd they are having sex with the GOP and neocons.
December 13th, 2007 at 9:37 pmOn his radio show yesterday, right-wing talker Michael Savage attacked former Vice President Al Gore’s recent Nobel Peace Prize, saying that it was awarded to him by “the socialist perverts in Norway.†“90 percent of the people on the Nobel Committee are into child pornography and molestation,†proclaimed Savage.
******************************************
Sounds to me like someone has a case of sour grapes. “Gore was awarded the Nobel Prize and I don’t like it — so that must mean that the Nobel Committee must be collectively smeared and the entire process condemned as punishment because they did something I don’t like.” Ye gods…would Savage like some cheese to go with his whine?
Seriously, though…Savage had better make certain that he has a good lawyer, because it seems to me that what he said could potentially be considered grounds for a slander suit unless he can provide something to back up these claims (which I seriously doubt he can). If he has nothing upon which to base these claims, then how can it really be doubted that he said these things purely out of the desire to damage the reputation of the Nobel Committee?
December 13th, 2007 at 10:01 pmI wonder if Savage remembers that Bush was once nominated for the prize.
December 14th, 2007 at 12:13 amFreedom of speech doesn’t cover lies, idiot.
Comment by gummitch
Errr, actually it does…
http://www.projectcensored.org/publications/2005/11.html
December 14th, 2007 at 3:26 amMichael Savage = no talent ass clown
That’s all you need to know.
December 14th, 2007 at 12:17 pm