President Bush’s former spokesman Ari Fleischer today called Mike Huckabee’s Foreign Affairs comments “unwarranted and unwise“:
There is much to like about Mike Huckabee. But he will serve Republican primary voters, and our nation, better if he focused his criticisms on the Democrats who will run against our eventual nominee and not on the President who has kept us safe.
Yesterday, Mitt Romney also said that Huckabee “ought to be saying thank you to the president for keeping us safe these last six years.”

Cat fight!
December 16th, 2007 at 8:43 pmYeah, but what about that first year, when the twit and his admin ignored warning after warning?
December 16th, 2007 at 8:43 pm1 - and it’s going to last from now til next November. Pinch me!
December 16th, 2007 at 8:46 pmI’d say, git some pop corn, sit back, and enjoy tha show!
December 16th, 2007 at 8:49 pmI love all these comments from idiots that said that Saddam had WMDs…we never forget.
December 16th, 2007 at 8:50 pmWow, it’s gotta suck trying to get the votes of the small percentage of American’s out-of-touch enough to still support this president. Even professionals like Huckabee and Romney must strain at times to keep up the facade of actually believing in this nationalistic crap.
December 16th, 2007 at 8:50 pmIt’s a full on GOoPer civil war.
Break out the Gallagher style plastic and cover yourselves, this is gonna get bloody.
King George is so arrogant that he’ll sic his attack dogs on anyone who tries to distance themselves from him.
-GSD
December 16th, 2007 at 8:51 pmP.S. I thought this turd Fliescher had already been flushed out of the system.
Now he’s back like an accursed floater.
-GSD
December 16th, 2007 at 8:52 pmWhen, where, and how does hanging around at tee-ball games and clearing brush constitute keeping anyone safe?? Unless, of course, we’re safer when the president is doing that than we are when he’s in Washington messing with the buttons.
If the Cheerleader Prince were capable of protecting anyone other than his perverted, war-profiteer legislator friends, we’d have an intact New York City skyline.
December 16th, 2007 at 8:53 pmLaughing too hard to say anything deep here… You go, Ari!
December 16th, 2007 at 8:57 pmAri Flusher.
-GSD
December 16th, 2007 at 8:59 pmThey’re forgetting the Eleventh Commandment. But seeing as Rethuglicans nowadays seem to ignore the first ten, that’s not surprising.
Cheers,
December 16th, 2007 at 9:00 pmIt’s too bad bush didn’t keep us safe for 7 years.
December 16th, 2007 at 9:01 pmi think it’s time for ari to get on board the “huck” huckabee express!
December 16th, 2007 at 9:08 pmThat is the same threat that Dictator Air gave to Bill Maher after the war started.
We call it the Dixie Chick Syndrome here in Texas.
It is a bully threat but given by the biggest wussies on the planet earth……like hairless flesher
December 16th, 2007 at 9:13 pmThe money wing and the neo-cons are going to burst the Huckabubble before it gets too big.
They are sharpening their knives.
They wanna get on board the Liberman-McCain Crazy Train for more Middle East wars.
-GSD
December 16th, 2007 at 9:13 pmHarpy Flusher.
-GSD
December 16th, 2007 at 9:14 pmI’ll say it again:
1) Shrub kept us safe ?
2) First the dems couldn’t critique the Prez (note that I didn’t say criticise, I said critique, as in to grade). Now te repubs can’t. Who is left ?
December 16th, 2007 at 9:17 pm#16 GSD
Yah, but this could show up some serious, perhaps coalition busting, rifts in the gop.
It’ll be interesting to hear each side whine about the smear tactics they both regularly use on anyone and everyone who opposes them.
December 16th, 2007 at 9:18 pmLebowski,
Yep. Gonna be fun. The base really hates McCain and frankly Lieberdinkweed is only a favored mook because he loves him some wars.
How are the gonna stomach Al Gore’s right hand man?
This is the shuddering of the foundations of GOP-erville.
-GSD
December 16th, 2007 at 9:20 pmLike the logical fallacy that because Event B followed Event A, it means Event B was caused by Event A, so is its corrollary a logical fallacy, that because Event B failed to follow Event A, it means Event A prevented Event B. Neither are correct.
Just because we haven’t been attacked by terrorists since 9/11 (an event that was rare before), it does not mean it was because of anything the Bush Administration did.
December 16th, 2007 at 9:21 pmOsama Bin Laden, unlike Bush, is not stupid. Another attack on the United States would not only be redundant, it would be counterproductive.
Only an idiot would risk the death penalty by trying to murder an enemy well on his way to committing suicide.
December 16th, 2007 at 9:44 pmI was about ready to stand up and applaud the ‘ol Huckster (in my mind), then he went into “I’m one-with-Bush more than you are !” mode . I sat down . ;D
I wonder if Romney’s demand for an apology will win it for Huckabee , or vice versa. Even if it helps him with the nomination , I suspect it’ll come back to cost him in the main event .
Wayne , you are correct , but logic has never been a strong point with that bunch.
December 16th, 2007 at 9:45 pmA petition in support of Bernie Ward is now out there:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/33/justice-for-bernie-ward
December 16th, 2007 at 9:50 pmThou shall not insult Mien Fuhrer Bush.
December 16th, 2007 at 9:52 pmI have to admit it should prove to be amusing watching the Reps trip over themselves, trying to get turned around, to attack Bushco after the nomination. I can’t imagine any candidate trying to pull off a “I’m just like the last guy” campaign. Anyone who wants a single vote, outside the hardcore Reich, will have to take a “George screwed up. Here’s how I’m different”, approach.
If Hillary is indeed nominated; the Reps will find themselves running against two men, Georgie and Bill, neither of whom is in the race. Regardless of outcome such a race would provide great “snark” long after we’re gone.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:03 pmWe might be physically safe - no thanks to Bush - but our Constitution is, and has been, repeatedly raped by his administration. Add to this, the looting of our treasury and the commission of crimes, and you have very little but physical safety.
Thank Bush?
For what?
December 16th, 2007 at 10:10 pmsince bert never does anything but what we see above, can he just be flagged out of existence here?
December 16th, 2007 at 10:14 pmcan we not get a moderator to expunge serial poo-and-shoo perps?
December 16th, 2007 at 10:15 pmget foleyed Bert.
your juvenile doo is beneath comtempt
get a cardboard sign, a quart of wine, and go tell it at an overpass.
thanks for being a public disgrace. it saves me a lot of time.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:24 pmall those dead New Yorkers are really grateful to your cheerleader prince, for protecting them the way he did that day in september. what a hero.
that’s one guy i can think of that’s a much bigger public disgrace than you, so you can either take solace there’s someone worse, or feel inferior that you’ve been outdone at it. that’s sad, at best.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:28 pm#31 yippie
The depths of your idiocy are indeed impressive. You show a complete inability to reason or even, apparently, understand other posts.
They were saying you should be banned for (poorly executed) ad hominem attacks and failure to engage your brain.
However, with each post you prove what a moron you and most other right wingers. Post away, gravel brain.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:29 pmHow safe were we on 9/11? On August 6, 2001 Bush was advised in the PDB on that day that “bin Laden determined to strike inside US”. Given that message Bush decides to go fishing. Later, when the intelligence officer briefed him Bush responded “O.k., you’ve covered your ass”. When Andy Card told Bush America is under attack after the 2nd plane hit the WTC Bush first had a dumbfounded look on his face then continue to read “My Pet Goat” to a bunch of 1st graders. Tell me again how safe we have been under Bush the last 6 5/6 years. (You don’t get to drop that 5/6).
You might also ask Salt Lake City, Virginia Tech, Omaha and Colorado how safe 2007 has been.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:31 pmI’ll trade these last ‘6 years of being safe’ in favor of being unsafe, not spied on, the country not mired in massive debt, quagmired in Iraq, our CIA agents not being exposed because right wing political vendettas, etc etc…for bush actually doing his job that first year…and keeping us safe then.
Suffice it to say, the ‘6 years of being safe’ is just complete bullshit.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:35 pmyour guys failed, bud, not mine.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:35 pmi’m as grateful for the cheerleader prince’s “protection” as you were/are for clinton’s before that.
but you can’t handle that - all you can do is sound like a jr. high punk and make thinly(poorly) veiled insults at all in earshot.
you go right ahead, freely, and demonstrate what kind of dickhead you are.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:39 pmin fact, bring on the whole enchilada for us bert - your own personal righty manifesto. kind of a politically-tinted Joe Dirt story that i for one would love to hear in its entirety
December 16th, 2007 at 10:41 pm#36 yipping poodle guy
How to get this through that rock bucket you call a skull? As another poster noted, just because we haven’t been attacked doesn’t mean Bush has “kept us safe.”
You want to have it both ways. If an attack happened tomorrow, you’d blame everyone but Bush.
that makes you a hypocrite. Unless, of course, you’d state right now that another attack on Bush’s watch would be his fault…
December 16th, 2007 at 10:42 pmIf you don’t like Bert here, just flag him over and over again. I don’t know why admin is so slow to get rid of some of these cretins, but sooner or later, they’ll do it.
Just flag the f’-in’ every last time the smarmy creep shows up.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:42 pm#43 yipster
You’re seriously calling out Clinton for letting Bin Laden escape?
What do you think Bush did in Tora Bora and has been doing continuously for the last six year?
How dumb do you have to be when your idol still lets Bin Laden walk free after the attacks?
You probably also believe they found wmd in Iraq but it got censored as part of the big media conspiracy to suppress the “good news” from Iraq.
Thank you in advance for continuing to post your drivel.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:51 pmAll of “the opposition” I see here are incoherent unicorn humpers - all that show up here any more are of the same, woefully inferior quality. they piss everyone off, and next thing you know, punches are bring thrown amongst the good folk.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:52 pmAnd by the way, I’m no fan of the Clintons.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:52 pmThat cursed Bush, the nerve of the man, keeping us safe for 6 years.
Man you moonbats hate being safe huh?
Merry moonbat Christmas… Yippie-Ki-Yay
*bert
*
Comment by BERT CONVY
Bush has done absolutely nothing to make us safe. He has taken our National Guard, which we need in emergencies and sent them to occupy Iraq. He has done nothing to secure our ports or our power plants. He has done nothing much to secure our airports. Bush has made thousands of new terrorists by invading Iraq and by his bellicose attitude towards the Muslim countries.
Just because AQ or some other terrorist organization has not attacked the US since 911 doesn’t mean that Bush has made us safe. All it means is that they are sitting back and enjoying the show, watching Bush and Company destroy the United States from within. Why should they bother to attack us again? Bush is doing a bang up job of destroying this country for them.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:54 pmHUCKAVA JOB.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:56 pmbert - who was the president when 9/11 happened, and what did he do to stop it.
until you can offer a real answer for that, you’re not passing go.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:57 pmThat cursed Bush, the nerve of the man, keeping us safe for 6 years.
Man you moonbats hate being safe huh?
Merry moonbat Christmas… Yippie-Ki-Yay
*bert
*
Comment by BERT CONVY
But but but you dont trust our intelligence!
December 16th, 2007 at 10:57 pmAnd Yippie,
I’ll ask again: will you state unequivocally that if another attack happens during Bush’s term then it is his fault?
If not, you can’t give him credit because there hasn’t been an attack.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:57 pmand thanks for the little *sshole headers and footers on your posts bert - it makes them easier to find and report.
December 16th, 2007 at 10:58 pmYou know which presidents have kept us safe?
Every single one after Lincoln. Seriously. No terrorist attacks on mainland USA during the last oh 200 years or so.
Oh wait there was one notable exception. Who was president during the 9/11 attacks on World Trade Center and the Pentagon?
Hmmmmmmmmmm….
Perhaps Ari ‘AIPAC’ Fleischer got his history mixed up. It is understandable - most Israel first people display a VERY selective historical memory…
December 16th, 2007 at 11:00 pm
Now ‘Bill CAUSED 911′…yeah, TP needs a better class of trolls, these aren’t even ready for yahoo.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:00 pmC’mon yippie, what’s your answer?
You’re not afraid to answer are you?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:00 pmThat darn GW, showing up all the dems and going ahead and winning this war… the bastid. -Bert
If its WON, why are we still there? Without an exit plan there can be no victory -\/\/
December 16th, 2007 at 11:01 pmHey Bert where is Osama?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:03 pmBert Yippie,
tic toc, tic toc.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:03 pmsame p.o.s. troll, different day. fit to live in slavery, but not as a free american.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:05 pmWow. So sad.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:06 pmThat troll doesn’t want freedom, he wants safety. I bet he was a late weaner as well.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:07 pmThe idiot doesn’t even know there has been a democracy in the Middle East for some time.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:09 pmJesus, Bert. Go change your piss-drenched pants.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:10 pmC’mon yip’d, answer…
December 16th, 2007 at 11:10 pm“So we ought to be saying thank you to the president for keeping us safe these last six yearsâ€
Not according to the sixteen intelligence agencies of the USA who said that Bush’s Iraq policy made us less secure by opening up Iraq to the terrorists, giving them a recruiting tool and base of operations.
Are we also supposed to thank Bush because no major US cities have been destroyed for the past 2 years 3 months??? Are we supposed to thank Reagan, GHWBush, and the CIA for building up al Qaeda, bin Laden, Taliban, Mujahadeen in the first place?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:13 pma democracy in the middle east is a terrific success for this President and for the world. -Bert Convy
You call that corrupt non-functioning group of militant tribes a Democracy?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:14 pm#70 yipping poodle guy yay
Are you serious? Are you really that dumb or just striking a pose?
What about that do you not understand?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:14 pmDoesn’t matter what shape the democracy is in, as long as bert has him some safeties.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:15 pmBut it’s more important to the democrats that we lose this war, we have to, they (you) are completely invested in our defeat.
Its a FREEDOM OPERATION BERT
December 16th, 2007 at 11:15 pm#70 Yip you,
Quite a tactic — dodging a question by claiming to be too dense to understand it. Verrrry persuasive.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:17 pmBerppie,
For the fourth time
December 16th, 2007 at 11:18 pmComment by BERT CONVY — December 16, 2007 @ 11:16 pm
bert, did you think of that all by yourself? you should write for “the half hour news hour”.
oh wait, you can’t. it was cancelled.
eh?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:19 pmYou call that corrupt non-functioning group of militant tribes a Democracy?…
Yup… — BERT CONVY — December 16, 2007 @ 11:16 pm
Figures, the moral majority guy, Bert, here likes corruption. Cuningham and Abramoff are proud of you.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:21 pmI thought we had won the war on May 1, 2003. I thought it was just a few deadenders in their last throes! I thought it was just one guy stealing a vase![sarc]
When the Palestinians have a vote, they elect Hamas. When Iraqis have a vote, they elect a pro-Iranian, anti-US government. 90% want us out ASAP. 60% approve of attacks on our troops. Since we are still there, they don’t really have a democracy.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:22 pmBert’s little brain doesn’t seem to be able to think up an answer…
December 16th, 2007 at 11:22 pm….swimming to Cuba… a good start. LOL -Bert
Naw, Limbaugh flew and took Viagra on his visit with Castro.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:23 pmComment by Xisithrus — December 16, 2007 @ 11:21 pm
no, no. bert’s a larry craig kind of guy. a gop, men’s room, tap-tap, lover boy kind of guy.
right bert?
(don’t respond if you agree bert, we understand.)
December 16th, 2007 at 11:24 pmComment by BERT CONVY — December 16, 2007 @ 11:23 pm
you drank the whole bottle of cough syrup?!
December 16th, 2007 at 11:25 pmClinton had us safe for eight years. Zero troops lost. Yet you spin it until HE is responsible for 9/11.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:25 pmFrom Berts Wyoming site:
Hillary, like all the democrats/socialists, will increase the size of our government and double our taxes.
Bush increased the size of government by 35% and devalued the dollar by half!
December 16th, 2007 at 11:26 pmBert has apparently abandoned his earlier contention that Bush deserves credit for keeping us safe since he won’t assert the corollary that, by the same token, Bush would be responsible if we were attacked (again) during his term.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:26 pmComment by Xisithrus — December 16, 2007 @ 11:23 pm
Actually, Rush went to the Dominican Republic, famous for underage sex.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:27 pmActually, Rush went to the Dominican Republic, famous for underage sex.
Comment by Keith — December 16, 2007 @ 11:27 pm
oh yeah bert’s into that too but it’s just research for a sketch he’s writing for “the half hour news hour”. right bert?
(it’s still cancelled dude)
December 16th, 2007 at 11:30 pmComment by BERT CONVY — December 16, 2007 @ 11:29 pm
congrats bert. you’ve been con-trolled.
(i’m going for two. i think i can get you again.)
December 16th, 2007 at 11:31 pmBert knows Bush failed, but he’s another liar rightard, incapable of recognizing or telling the truth. wingnuts are mental defectives, by birth. nothing gets through to bert, bigfoot, CHL, or any of the other people that lie to themselves on a daily basis in order to prop up their empty, soulless lives while they wait for their “ship to come in”, instead of going out and fixing the disaster Bush has made of this country.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:31 pm#91 Bertie ki yay,
You are a truly entertaining troglodyte. How is it that you know this supposedly “secret code.”
Calling people ‘nancy’? You know what they say about people who always accuse others of being gay.
Don’t blame us for the fact you hate who you are.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:33 pmbert?
bert???
*?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:34 pmDon’t blame us for the fact you hate who you are.
Comment by lebowski — December 16, 2007 @ 11:33 pm
don’t be mean to bert. he slept with his sister, but it was an “accident”.
right bert?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:36 pmbert?
bert???
conservatism needs you bert… don’t quit now.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:36 pmFreakin hilarious!
December 16th, 2007 at 11:37 pmSharpen up the knives, boys and have each other for lunch!
Comment by BERT CONVY — December 16, 2007 @ 11:36 pm
that was easy.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:37 pmI’m going to miss him.
I really am.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:39 pmMan made global warming is a farce, it is natural and there is nothing we can do to stop it. So why mess up our economy doing so? -Wyoming Bert
Bush aready messed up the economy, gas is three times as high and the dollar is worth much less and the deficit is way way up there not to mention the Iraqi welfare state and a war fought by supplementals and loans from Commie China.
Damn Bert, you should read sites that arent so ad hominem
December 16th, 2007 at 11:40 pmAt last, you moonbats have sunk to the level of infantile sexual insults…-Bert
God created the moon Bert .
Infantile is the wyoming web site attached to your moniker.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:42 pmI’m going to miss him.
I really am.
Comment by lebowski — December 16, 2007 @ 11:39 pm
don’t worry tomorrow night he’s coming back for more, remember? he’s into humiliation (a real republican turn on) so let’s not disappoint him, ok?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:43 pmZep,
Poor “Bert” is skeert of the girls. He prefers “Ernie.”
December 16th, 2007 at 11:44 pm#105 joe
Yah.
I also enjoyed how he tried to spin it like he was attacked — they’re so into the victimage.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:48 pmComment by lebowski — December 16, 2007 @ 11:48 pm
he’s a “huck” huckabee kind of guy (or tranny) and i like it.
see ya tomorrow night bert, ya big, lovable, balloon knot licker!
December 16th, 2007 at 11:51 pmFirst this
At last, you moonbats have sunk to the level of infantile sexual insults…
immediately followed by this (in the same post,. no less!):
See you girls tomorrow.
Comment by BERT CONVY — December 16, 2007 @ 11:36 pm
This troll -like most trolls- is a little lacking in the self-awareness department. Funny how he plays the victim after he called everyone here “moonbats” in his very first post.
December 16th, 2007 at 11:54 pmI’m sure Bert is Mr. P
December 16th, 2007 at 11:57 pmBut [Huckabee] will serve Republican primary voters […] better if he focused his criticisms on the Democrats who will run against our eventual nominee
Translation: It doesn’t really matter if Huckabee has a point, or whether his criticism of Bush is valid. The only thing that matter is winning the election and keeping the voter’s attention away from Pres Bush’s disastrous record -which is why I won’t spend too much time on that subject… Look! Over there! Something shiny!
December 17th, 2007 at 12:00 amI wouldn’t be surprised, Keith.
Or his butt buddy, Ralph. He’s terrified of Hillary, too. :D
December 17th, 2007 at 12:00 am#111 Gregor
Good point. Fleischer’s like a real life troll — shift the questions people ask and it doesn’t really matter what the answers are.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:04 amAt last, you moonbats have sunk to the level of infantile sexual insults…
My work is done here..
See you girls tomorrow..
Yippie-Ki-Yay moonbatters
*bert
Yeah, yippie-ki-yay, you chickensh*t wingnut. Guess we’ll all go on loving freedom while you go back and suck Bush’s “safety” teat. Wipe yer mouth, baby.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:05 amFunny how he plays the victim after he called everyone here “moonbats†in his very first post.
Comment by Gregor Samsa — December 16, 2007 @ 11:54 pm
It’s the same schtick Li’l Footie runs whenever he stumbles onto a thread… come thru the door insuting EVERYONE w/ some generic, irrational stereotype, then play the victim when folks push back.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:12 amAri shouts from the cheap seats, with nothing on the line…nothing new here…
December 17th, 2007 at 12:15 am#115 RoS
Yah, sop for the pos.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:17 ambilbobaggins… how about that surge…? LOL
That darn GW, showing up all the dems and going ahead and winning this war… the bastid.
Comment by BERT CONVY
Yeah, how about that surge ole Bert. Fat lot of good it’s done. We’re still there, there’s no hope of bringing our boys home, we’re still bankrupting our economy, the Iraqi government no closer to getting their act together and oil is almost $100 a barrel. And, people are still dying every day in Iraq. Not as many as did before, but that’s probably more due to Al Sadar’s cease fire, the fact that ethnic cleansing has made it so there is no one to kill in your neighborhood, and we certainly can’t forget that we are paying our US tax dollars to Shieks so that they won’t continue to kill us.
Yep, that surge is working out quite well, if you are a Republiscum neoCON that is.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:17 amHey Zooey,
December 17th, 2007 at 12:18 amP would say”Yippie-Ki-Yay moonbats”.
Ralph was dumber than Bert and more verbally-challenged. Both had the strange Hillary fixation. Ralph said she was responsible for the destruction of the Minneapolis bridge–that her people placed bombs on it.
Any success of the troops is bad for the dems.
You must be so proud… but you’ll always have Murtha and Kerry.
*bert
Comment by BERT CONVY
Oh really? Have the Democrats poll numbers gone down? Have the poll numbers of the people who think that Iraq was a mistake and want us to leave gone down? No? Well, then, I guess that the so-called “success” of the troops wasn’t bad for the Dems. But, keep hoping. I’m sure that’s what keeps you going. I would love to be a fly on the wall the day after election 2008. Your head is going to explode and it isn’t going to be a pretty sight.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:21 amPat Buchanan was asked today by Wolf Blitzer what he thought of Huckabee’s quote. He said Huckabee was exactly right.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:33 amJoe Lieberman will endorse John McCain Monday.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:41 amOff topic:
Hey, bilbo, great job on the other thread defending us “nutjobs” for the 9/11 events.
I can’t understand why, even among progressives, there is such a blind faith that the govt is uncapable of even planning to kill its own citizens. I just can’t. During shock and awe, they wiped out entire villages full of kids and women, like that, as if they were (and still are) nothing, and renamed as collateral damage.
I guess that if they are white people is unconceivable to plan killing 3,000 of them. Riiight.
December 17th, 2007 at 12:42 amMaybe we should thank Bush for ignoring the warning they got about Bin Laden months before the attack.
It was their plan all along to just let it happen, or maybe even worse.
Bush/Cheney/Repukians
Hague Trials ‘09
Buck Fush
December 17th, 2007 at 12:47 amComment by Keith — December 17, 2007 @ 12:18 am
I didn’t know P used to say that. You’re right about Ralph, he was pretty stoopit. :-D
December 17th, 2007 at 12:49 amBubble Boy has kept us safe?
According to the official Bush Administration party line, the nineteen hijackers came from the following countries: Saudi Arabia (15), United Arab Emirates, the new home of Halliburton (2), Egypt (1) and Lebanon (1).
Excerpt from the July 15, 2007 edition of Editor and Publisher:
“The Los Angeles Times reports today that according to a senior U.S. military officer and Iraqi lawmakers, about 45% of all foreign militants “targeting U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians and security forces are from Saudi Arabia.†Only 15% are from Syria and Lebanon; and 10% are from North Africa. This is based on official U.S. military figures made available to newspaper by the senior officer.
Afghanistan and Iraq are not even mentioned as perpetrators in either of the two preceding paragraphs, however, the United States has invaded and occupies both of those countries, overlooking every country contributing hijackers to the 9/11 cause and foreign militants to Iraq.
The preceding may only make sense to the trolls.
Any trolls care to explain?
December 17th, 2007 at 1:06 amI’ll enjoy seeing what new praise Ari and Mitt have for the Bush administration next week. This weekend, Rep. Robert Wexler’s petition to begin impeachment proceedings immediately for Dick Cheney gathered 50,000 signatures in under 24 hours. Since then and up until this hour it has acquired 1-2,000 new signatures every hour. At this rate, the petition could have half a million signatures within 24 hours.This comes in response to Dennis Kucinich’s bill being sent to the house judiciary committee where democratic leaders had hoped it would vanish.
This response level will be impossible to ignore, and amounts to serious trouble for Bush and Cheney, even though the mainstream media hasn’t caught on yet. Break out the string mops and wringer buckets. Some big league bloodbathing is imminent.
December 17th, 2007 at 1:07 amSorry, my math is wrong. Nine days.
December 17th, 2007 at 1:14 amexactly as many as there have been persuasive, factual posts by righties(or republicans, or independents, or libetarians, or whatever you people are calling yourselves this week) on this website, frank.
but if you think it’s because terrorists are afraid of the cheerleader prince, you’re as vain and dumb as terrorists no doubt believe us all to be.
December 17th, 2007 at 2:07 amWell, there were bombings in Algeria this week. Not to mention the daily attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I would guess there have been thousands of attacks since 9/11.
-GSD
December 17th, 2007 at 2:43 amA country can’t be a democracy with tens of thousands of foreign troops occupying them during an election.
I mean that is what George W. told the Syrians in regards to removing Syrian troops from Lebanon.
Right?
-GSD
December 17th, 2007 at 2:47 am#129 –
Under whose watch did the attacks on 9/11 occur, 36 days after the report was given to Bubble Boy, stating, “bin Laden determined to strike”?
And given your self-admitted fascist preferences, he’s covered both ways. If we aren’t attacked again, its because Chimpy has kept us safe and if we are attacked, its because we haven’t surrendered enough freedoms yet.
You are no doubt comforted that your hero is the only Connecticut native to occupy the Oval Office, descended from a long line of Yankee bluebloods, a cheerleader at Andover Prep in MA, rejected by the University of Texas, went to Harvard and then Yale, extensively used alcohol/drugs, avoided serving in Vietnam, is afraid of horses and despite being over 60 years of age, routinely rides a bicycle — a true, macho Texan. Ever seen the statue of Andrew Jackson at the Tennessee State Capitol in Nashville, riding a horse, with both front legs elevated off the ground. Perhaps Texas, claiming this wannabe New England-bred cowboy as their own, will erect a statue of their former governor, riding a sting ray bicycle, popping a wheelie.
A couple of quotes by your hero, just for fun…
One of the great things about books is, sometimes there are some fantastic pictures. U.S. News & World Report (January 3, 2000)
Those in authority should take appropriate precautions to protect our citizens. But we will not allow this enemy to win the war by changing our way of life or restricting our freedoms. Remarks by the President In Photo Opportunity with the National Security Team, September 12, 2001 (he must have had his fingers crossed)
But all in all, it’s been a fabulous year for Laura and me. 12/21/2001 White House release
We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories. You remember when Colin Powell stood up in front of the world, and he said, Iraq has got laboratories, mobile labs to build biological weapons. They’re illegal. They’re against the United Nations resolutions, and we’ve so far discovered two. And we’ll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven’t found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they’re wrong, we found them. - George W. Bush, May 29, 2003
I’m a war president. On NBC’s Meet the Press, February 8, 2004
I want to be the peace president 21 July 2004
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we. 5 August 2004
The preceding is only a small sampling.
If he decides to leave office in 2009, why don’t you and those of like mind move to a special location, and hire Chimpy to be your dictator? Sounds like a marriage made in heaven.
December 17th, 2007 at 2:51 amAddendum to Post #133 —
One more quote…
I wasn’t happy when we found out there wasn’t weapons [of mass destruction in Iraq] 2nd Presidential Debate, October 8, 2004
December 17th, 2007 at 2:53 amAddendum to Post #134 —
Sorry, couldn’t resist…
A political candidate who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not a person you want as your commander in chief.
December 17th, 2007 at 2:54 amBush to supporters at an airport rally, October 27, 2004
Elections in South Korea: Right candidate is corrupt
Fist fight in Korean assembly
December 17th, 2007 at 3:23 amYawn…
December 17th, 2007 at 3:40 amLatest NSA synchro-2Pac
Latest NSA synchro
Latest NSA synchro
December 17th, 2007 at 3:57 amThere needs to be a song. I woke up one morning in the year 2000 and my country was showing signs of insanity. Then it got worse.
December 17th, 2007 at 5:37 am#129 Comment by Frank M — December 17, 2007 @ 2:00 am
Smoking your crack again… eh?
What’s that Frank? Did you just tell me to shut up or what… mail me some of your own powder. But remember, ever since the ANTHRAX ATTACKS they open your mail to inspect.
O.K… I exaggerated a bit.
I don’t think they open ALL the mail.
Please just go back to your bridge Frank.
.
December 17th, 2007 at 6:31 am.
Hay all,
See this neat trick?
Here’s some details about WHY Kucinich wasn’t allowed in the Iowa Debate, even though Allen Keys NEVER HAS HAD A STORE FRONT OFFICE in Iowa…
Hint: It wasn’t a Democratic Party debate, but instead, one hosted, run, and funded by PRIVATE INTERESTS!
Davis Fleetwood uncovers some truth, obfuscation, and deceit behind the curtain…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RXFWojq3Uc
If your not welcomed by your own Party to join their debate, hold your own forum…
http://www.ustream.tv/ BmuDUIseQhm0,GvG2ao47a3×2z1KUZHp.usv
It’s not getting pretty any time soon.
Sorry to interrupt… SHOP ON!!!
.
December 17th, 2007 at 6:41 amOops…
It’s Alan Keyes and he has NOT had that needed qualifier that kept Kucinich out.
.
December 17th, 2007 at 6:44 amRussia: Putin accepts pos as prime
Russia delivers nuclear fuel to Iran
Abdullah pardons rape victim
December 17th, 2007 at 8:46 amAnd every time we criticize Bush, the trolls remind us that Bush isn’t running for president in 2008. Yeah, we respond, but his ideology is.
So here we have a candidate who chooses to distance himself from a president who’s very unpopular with the American people, and his fellow Repubs are beating him up for it.
It appears that Bush is on the ballot in 2008 after all. No matter which Repub gets the nomination.
If the GOP was smart, they would be fighting to reclaim their party from the neocons who have driven it into the ground, instead of continuing to cheer the very ideas that the American people are running away from.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:52 am#129 Frankm
Bert was too chickenhawksh!t to answer this question. Would you like to try:
December 17th, 2007 at 10:24 amThe Repukes go where the money is (and all too many Dems as well), and would no more forgo that money than a heroin addict would pass up their next fix.
December 17th, 2007 at 10:26 amand of course, that should actually be “…because there hasn’t been another attack during Bush’s term.”
December 17th, 2007 at 10:35 amThe president has kept us safe?
Ho Ho Ho
Humbug
December 17th, 2007 at 10:45 amEnacting policies that act as recruitment fodder for radical Islam is making us……safer?
December 17th, 2007 at 10:54 amAssigning credit to the Bubble Boy for no attacks since 9/11 presumes that he had absolutely no involvement in either allowing it to happen or making it happen.
Seemingly reasonable people, many progressives included, are skeptical about nearly everything the Bush administration says, however, in this one case, are willing to believe and defend every word we’ve been told, to the point of ridiculing others who might have the audacity to say that we need more answers. And this has occurred despite the unprecedented benefits that the Bush administration has received from 9/11 having occurred.
Any reasonable person who studies what is known about this day would conclude that what our government has told us about 9/11 does not make sense. I don’t pretend to know all the answers regarding what occurred that day, however, I do contend that we haven’t been allowed to learn the answers to these questions. And the Bush administration has stonewalled any and all attempts to solve these mysteries at every turn.
Just because the conclusion of a thorough and searching investigation of 9/11 might produce a result that we might no want to face does not mean that we should pretend otherwise. Refusing to go down that path does not and cannot change what occurred on that day no more than refusing to undergo testing to diagnose a rapidly growing, malignant tumor will cause it not to exist.
“Only the small secrets need to be protected. The large ones are kept secret by public incredulity.” — Marshall McLuhan
“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”–George Orwell (O’Brien in 1984)
December 17th, 2007 at 10:54 am“Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.” — Blaise Pascal
December 17th, 2007 at 12:06 pm