Comments on: Judge rules White House logs are public in Abramoff case. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:55:34 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: RUCerious http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195982 RUCerious Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:00:32 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195982 Yup, those logs were really 'sensitive'. That's why they made great toilet paper! Yup, those logs were really ’sensitive’.

That’s why they made great toilet paper!

]]> By: WaltTheMan http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195872 WaltTheMan Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:03:30 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195872 Republicans say they are the party of treason. When they say it, the leading <strong>t</strong> is silent. Republicans say they are the party of treason. When they say it, the leading t is silent.

]]> By: judyinnm http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195848 judyinnm Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:48:58 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195848 Once upon a time, it was the American people who had a right to privacy; and we had a right to know what our government was doing. Since Georgejr took office, it's exactly the reverse - our president reserves for only himself and his henchmen the rights he has taken away from us. Wouldn't it be nice if some honest true red-blooded American NSA officer came forward with the wiretaps of the White House covering the past seven years? Once upon a time, it was the American people who had a right to privacy; and we had a right to know what our government was doing. Since Georgejr took office, it’s exactly the reverse – our president reserves for only himself and his henchmen the rights he has taken away from us.

Wouldn’t it be nice if some honest true red-blooded American NSA officer came forward with the wiretaps of the White House covering the past seven years?

]]> By: crassus http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195840 crassus Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:44:02 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195840 Comment by Frank M — December 17, 2007 @ 2:00 pm Not until we find all the witches. Comment by Frank M — December 17, 2007 @ 2:00 pm

Not until we find all the witches.

]]> By: crassus http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195836 crassus Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:43:08 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195836 That paper shredding contract just got worth another $million. That paper shredding contract just got worth another $million.

]]> By: MapleStreet http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195777 MapleStreet Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:00:08 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195777 How is it good for our country that we know whether someone connected with "influence" peddling / bribing had unseemly access to the WH ? Pay me a couple of million and maybe I'll change my mind. As Pinky would say, "NARF!" How is it good for our country that we know whether someone connected with “influence” peddling / bribing had unseemly access to the WH ?

Pay me a couple of million and maybe I’ll change my mind.

As Pinky would say, “NARF!”

]]> By: ForTruth http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195764 ForTruth Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:53:32 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195764 Yes the Gannon/Guckert visits are much more juicy. And Americans get really "get behind" a good sex scandal. Yes the Gannon/Guckert visits are much more juicy. And Americans get really “get behind” a good sex scandal.

]]> By: DenverOasis http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195725 DenverOasis Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:31:57 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195725 "the Bush administration tried to argue"... how many times have they tried to argue points that go against US law? let me count the ways... maybe if we're lucky they'll just create another executive order or signing statement to skirt the law. “the Bush administration tried to argue”…

how many times have they tried to argue points that go against US law? let me count the ways… maybe if we’re lucky they’ll just create another executive order or signing statement to skirt the law.

]]> By: Zimzone http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195718 Zimzone Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:22:41 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195718 What, me worry? <em>Alfred E. Neuman /</em> George W. Bush What, me worry? Alfred E. Neuman / George W. Bush

]]> By: zhoward http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195706 zhoward Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:11:07 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195706 Frank M: Public records are public records... Frank M: Public records are public records…

]]> By: desaparecido http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195701 desaparecido Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:09:16 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195701 The Insurgency manages a wry smile. www.tshirtinsurgency.com The Insurgency manages a wry smile.
http://www.tshirtinsurgency.com

]]> By: squidbilly http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195702 squidbilly Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:09:16 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195702 Can't wait to find how many times he Jack-off ed in the White House and with whom. Can’t wait to find how many times he Jack-off ed in the White House and with whom.

]]> By: The Republic of Stupidity http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195700 The Republic of Stupidity Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:07:49 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195700 So, where’s the breach of our Constitution in that? Comment by Marcus Aurelius — December 17, 2007 @ 2:22 pm Awww, it's just meant to be a distraction by this maroon, that's all. The topic of the thread is the court ruling, not what happened the better part of a decade ago.c= Let's try to stay on topic here, which is the continuing malfeasance and law-breaking of the Brusch Regime! So, where’s the breach of our Constitution in that?

Comment by Marcus Aurelius — December 17, 2007 @ 2:22 pm

Awww, it’s just meant to be a distraction by this maroon, that’s all.

The topic of the thread is the court ruling, not what happened the better part of a decade ago.c= Let’s try to stay on topic here, which is the continuing malfeasance and law-breaking of the Brusch Regime!

]]> By: gummitch http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195695 gummitch Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:05:13 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195695 <em>Bill Clinton’s log has been scrutinized quite closely by the GOPerverts. -GSD Comment by GSD — December 17, 2007 @ 3:01 pm</em> The Clenis! Bill Clinton’s log has been scrutinized quite closely by the GOPerverts.

-GSD

Comment by GSD — December 17, 2007 @ 3:01 pm

The Clenis!

]]> By: GSD http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195689 GSD Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:01:40 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195689 Bill Clinton's <strong>log</strong> has been scrutinized quite closely by the GOPerverts. -GSD Bill Clinton’s log has been scrutinized quite closely by the GOPerverts.

-GSD

]]> By: GSD http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195686 GSD Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:00:07 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195686 Jeff Gannon's private visits with George W. Bush are no ones business! -GSD Jeff Gannon’s private visits with George W. Bush are no ones business!

-GSD

]]> By: ScrewBush http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195681 ScrewBush Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:58:05 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195681 I can only assume that in the middle of any GOPer convention is a big sandbox, where all the little boys can play together and taunt each other with mommy and daddy barbs, honing their mastery of that classic tome -- Karl's Political Discourse. Hey GOPers, "What about Clinton..." is no way to start any sort of logical discussion. It's only a way of saying "I am a child. I just poopied my pants. Wanna see?" It’s the equivalent of "But Mommy, Johnny did it first." What is terribly telling and sad is that this sandbox level of discourse works for you guys. You all have just never developed an adult brain. Maybe that's why some GOPers enjoy comparing genitals with underage pages. I can only assume that in the middle of any GOPer convention is a big sandbox, where all the little boys can play together and taunt each other with mommy and daddy barbs, honing their mastery of that classic tome — Karl’s Political Discourse.

Hey GOPers, “What about Clinton…” is no way to start any sort of logical discussion. It’s only a way of saying “I am a child. I just poopied my pants. Wanna see?” It’s the equivalent of “But Mommy, Johnny did it first.” What is terribly telling and sad is that this sandbox level of discourse works for you guys. You all have just never developed an adult brain. Maybe that’s why some GOPers enjoy comparing genitals with underage pages.

]]> By: The Republic of Stupidity http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195676 The Republic of Stupidity Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:56:49 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195676 How is this decision good for the country? Comment by Frank M — December 17, 2007 @ 2:00 pm Uhhh... government transparency? Whatsammatta, Frankie, afraid we'll finally find out who Jeff Gannon was visiting over and over and over again? (My money's on KKKarl...) How is this decision good for the country?

Comment by Frank M — December 17, 2007 @ 2:00 pm

Uhhh… government transparency?

Whatsammatta, Frankie, afraid we’ll finally find out who Jeff Gannon was visiting over and over and over again?

(My money’s on KKKarl…)

]]> By: had enough http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195652 had enough Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:43:38 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195652 I noticed <strong><em>with hunt</em></strong> mentioned in a previous post... A bit off topic, but let me mention a <strong><em>real witch hunt going on:</em></strong> <strong>Bernie Ward, one of the very few liberal radio talk show hosts has been silenced for an error in journalistic research he did <em>years </em>ago. He may go to prison. Petition to sign: <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/33/justice-for-bernie-ward" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/33/justice-for-bernie-wardJustice for Bernie Ward</a></strong> I noticed with hunt mentioned in a previous post…
A bit off topic, but let me mention a real witch hunt going on:
Bernie Ward, one of the very few liberal radio talk show hosts has been silenced for an error in journalistic research he did years ago. He may go to prison.
Petition to sign:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/33/justice-for-bernie-wardJustice for Bernie Ward

]]> By: Pete Bogs http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4195625 Pete Bogs Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:30:57 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/12/17/judge-rules-white-house-logs-are-public-in-abramoff-case/#comment-4195625 wonderful... now let's get them released immediately or start making arrests... wonderful… now let’s get them released immediately or start making arrests…

]]>