House passes Veterans Guaranteed Bonus Act.
By on Dec 18th, 2007 at 5:20 pm
House passes Veterans Guaranteed Bonus Act.
Last month, Iraq war vet Jordan Fox revealed that some wounded soldiers were being asked by the Pentagon to return part of their enlistment bonuses. Today, the House passed the Veterans Guaranteed Bonus Act to ensure that future soldiers aren’t treated like Fox. The legislation will ensure that members of the armed services who are discharged as a result of combat-related wounds receive the full compensation to which they are entitled by the Department of Defense. Rep. Jason Altmire (D-PA), one of the bill’s primary sponsors, spoke on the floor this morning. Watch it:
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Bush Legacy
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
DADT
Economy
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Franken
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
International Relations
Iran
Iraq
Justice
Krauthammer
Kyl
LGBT
Limbaugh
McCain
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Public Plan
Race
Radical Right
Rove
Sanford
Sotomayor
Steele
Supreme Court
Terrorism
ThinkProgress
Tiller
Torture
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
I'm sure Chimpy will veto this.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:21 pmWell, if he'll veto health care for kids, and ignore the care that our vets get down the street at Walter Reed, why wouldn't he veto this?
December 18th, 2007 at 5:23 pmIt says it was a unanimous vote, so even if Bush somehow does veto this it will be overridden.
http://kdka.com/local/Enlistment.Bonuses.Veterans.2.613624.html
December 18th, 2007 at 5:23 pm#1...not a chance. He'd be over-ridden in a second and would look like a bigger tool than he already does if he tries to veto it.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:23 pmOh PLEEEEEEASE Veto this, Mr. President.
I dare ya. I double dare ya.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:24 pmBlue Stater,
Signing Statement then?
December 18th, 2007 at 5:25 pmReich-wing Hypocrisy 101: Perfect College Sinners
December 18th, 2007 at 5:25 pmI’m sure Chimpy will veto this.
Comment by Leftside Annie — December 18, 2007 @ 5:21 pm
It's essentially chump change, so he'll probably try to take credit for it. One of the chief sponsors is Jeff Sessions (R-AL) so you can figure that Bush and the Republicans will keep mentioning his name and give all credit to the Republicans.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:27 pmOh good - another embarrassing "veto-op" for dubbie. i wonder who will get the pen he signs that veto with? Erik, or Cookie, or Buzzie??
December 18th, 2007 at 5:32 pmIs there a roll call count yet on this?
December 18th, 2007 at 5:32 pmnever mind, I see it had no nay votes.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:34 pmVeto proof... nice
bush is so stupid, he'll just have to put in a signing statement that reads: 'If DEAD, wife must return all money,uniforms, and cash.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:39 pmSoldiers, do not allow yourselves be used as cannon fodder by your government. Resist by joining the IVAW [Iraq Veterans Against the War] and say NO to the war machine of the United States.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:40 pmThe fact that this bill was even necessary speaks volumes as to the callousness and greed of this administration.
Red states, are you listening?
December 18th, 2007 at 5:40 pmYES, it is about time that they did right by the guys stuck in this illegal, immoral war.
But of course the deserter will veto it, because he DOES NOT SUPPORT the Troops, like most armchair reichwing warriors.
Buck Fush
December 18th, 2007 at 5:51 pmHouse passed the increased CAFE standards bill. Hopefully they will take up the domestic power generation portion left out of this bill first thing next year.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:53 pmHouse passed the increased CAFE standards bill. Hopefully they will take up the domestic power generation portion left out of this bill first thing next year.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — December 18, 2007 @ 5:53 pm
Either start your own blog, or STFU on your off topic, stupid ramblings - aspergers boy! Your lack of proper 'socialization' skills explains why you're SUCH AN ABSOLUTE MORON - JUNIOR!
December 18th, 2007 at 5:55 pmHe’s not going to veto legislation he backed. This was bi-partisan. Get real.
Comment by cold_hard_left — December 18, 2007 @ 5:58 pm
But Jason, the SCHIP legislation was bi-partisan too. He vetoed that, didn't he?
December 18th, 2007 at 6:02 pm#19, rtwl,
When I post, I always use my own name. As much as you would like to bring me or others down through this association tactic, those who have read my posts for a long while recognize those other posts as written by some other author.
I have seen cases in which people will post blatantly racist, sexist, bigotted script, and sign my name, since they can't legitimately label me any of those things. Fortunately, TP mods and other posters recognized those imposters.
Guess you're going to have to work a little harder to defame anyone who challenges your beliefs.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:06 pmNext they should pass a bill saying that the military can't force the soldiers to pay for equipment that was either damaged or destroyed in combat. That's something else our compassionate leader of the military has perpetuated. If your gun and your body armor are left behind after a fire fight, the soldier has to pay for it. If your gun gets ruined in the 115 degree heat and sandstorms, the soldier has to pay for it.
A question for CHL - if the President supports this legislation, why didn't he do something instead of making Congress pass a law to make it happen. If he thought this was the right thing, then why didn't he, immediately upon hearing what was going on, issue an executive order to make sure that these soldiers are paid the money they were promised?
December 18th, 2007 at 6:07 pmI am disgusted that the Legislature, by law, has to stop this Administration from screwing our soldiers. The same soldiers this administration uses as bait to get more billions for no bid DoD contracts.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:07 pmGuess you’re going to have to work a little harder to defame anyone who challenges your beliefs.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — December 18, 2007 @ 6:06 pm
Jason Hitler, you lie.
Just another fact.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:10 pmGuess you’re going to have to work a little harder to defame anyone who challenges your beliefs.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler
I guess it's just a really big coincidence that you and CHL show up here at the same time and use the same phrasing and the same insulting nick-name for Senator Clinton.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:10 pmIt’s about f’in time! Next will they take up the issue for those soldiers whose VA benefits were nullified because their assignment orders were a single day short of requirements? After that, you have the maimed and shell shocked. It seems that when the Bushies say support our troops they are referring to bras and cod pieces.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:17 pmPoor attention deficit Jason. Can't stay on topic, must urinate all over each and every thread with off topic crap.
Kind of like a mutt marking its territory.
Anyone got a rolled up paper?
December 18th, 2007 at 6:22 pm#24, bulbous bubo,
Couldn't say if it is coicindence or some type of subterfuge. I just know it's not me.
Perhaps phrasing is similar, but content and argument is clearly not similar.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:26 pmPerhaps phrasing is similar, but content and argument is clearly not similar.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — December 18, 2007 @ 6:26 pm
yes it is, the same shit. You're a lousy liar, as well as a lousy American.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:34 pmHey folks, please, never criticize JMH, the only thing that he lacks is a brain cell.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:42 pmAny wonder why recruitment in in the terlet?
Besides providing cannon fodder for the never ending war on terra?
December 18th, 2007 at 6:43 pmActually, the House version does nothing for Vets like Fox - On Friday the Sessions-sponsored bill passed the Senate and it would be retroactive to 12 September 2001. The House version has no retroactive protections. I blogged about the two versions of the legislation earlier today. In reality, there has been no movement on compromise language, and it is likely that nothing will happen before Congress leaves town for the holiday.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:54 pmWhen I post, I always use my own name. As much as you would like to bring me or others down through this association tactic, those who have read my posts for a long while recognize those other posts as written by some other author.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — December 18, 2007 @ 6:06 pm
As much as I'd love to believe you, Jason, I just don't. Forgive me for believing my own lyin' eyes.
December 18th, 2007 at 6:59 pmHe’s not going to veto legislation he backed. This was bi-partisan. Get real.
Comment by cold_hard_left — December 18, 2007 @ 5:58 pm
He was against it before he was for it. The Pentagon asked for "their" money back from the wounded vets, remember? Who is Commander in Chief?
December 18th, 2007 at 7:04 pmHendler, since registration, no one has the ability to do what you are claiming. Registration was brought for that reason among others, actually, because it was a tactic your side used against the rest of us.
As for now, pardon us if we don't believe that 'you' are not a sock puppet among many sock puppets run by a single troll trying to disrupt the conversation.
Anyway, hopefully my little crusade of getting as many people to flag you and yours inappropriate posts will either shape you up or ship you out.
December 18th, 2007 at 7:08 pmAnyway, hopefully my little crusade of getting as many people to flag you and yours inappropriate posts will either shape you up or ship you out.
Comment by Jeremy in Denver — December 18, 2007 @ 7:08 pm
Probably won't see much of jason hitler here any more, since you have caught him dead to rights with the registration thing. too bad, he's good for a laugh, and a leading indicator of how disastrous the next election will be for the Bushreich.
December 18th, 2007 at 7:30 pmHendler comes in with a completely irrelevant post anyway, so why respond to the a-hole?
December 18th, 2007 at 7:31 pmIt’s about f’in time! Next will they take up the issue for those soldiers whose VA benefits were nullified because their assignment orders were a single day short of requirements?
And please don't forget all the injured veterans who were rated 29% permanently disabled rather than 30%. What's the difference you ask? If they are rated 30% permanently disabled, they will get lifetime health benefits. They are rating people who have lost a leg or an arm as 29% disabled. To them, if you have at least 71% of your body left intact, you are only 29% disabled.
December 18th, 2007 at 7:35 pmHouse passes Veterans Guaranteed Bonus Act
December 18th, 2007 at 7:53 pmThis is fine and good, but our Veterans still need more than what they are getting. And I am sure America would go along with it for reasons it is the right thing to do and because many Americans have feelings of guilt knowing the soldiers unfair multi tours in Iraq means the draft will not be brought back.
It's disgusting that it takes an act of Congress in order to force the Bushies to play fair.
December 18th, 2007 at 8:31 pmI think the majority of enlistees in Bush's Army come from rural areas, depressed areas, and red states. We often comment about people who vote against their own best interests.
December 18th, 2007 at 8:34 pmThe fact that this is even an issue is bull.
December 18th, 2007 at 8:56 pmAs a side note, just curious: How much did the GOP pay Larry Flynt to keep the lid on Lott's romp with a gay escort?
December 18th, 2007 at 11:59 pm#33, Jeremy,
Yes, registration prevents someone using my name, but it doesn't prevent someone trying to emulate my posts to achieve the same end. You act like you are so brilliant as to see similarity, then deny any ability to recognize counterfeit.
I suppose your other means of dismissing my posts on merit fail, so you then have to attempt some other misdirection.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:07 amI suppose your other means of dismissing my posts on merit fail, so you then have to attempt some other misdirection.
jeremy has never failed to destroy your asinine posts, Hitler. You've never actually made a cogent, actual, honest point. Don't blame others for your blind ignorance.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:13 am"I suppose your other means of dismissing my posts on merit fail, so you then have to attempt some other misdirection."
Are you kidding? Your posts are not even worth noting, much less dismissing.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:18 amBottom line: if it had not been for practices of DoD under the Cheney-Bush administration, led by the great Decider, to recoup bonuses from wounded troops, this legislation NEVER would have been NECESSARY!!!!!!!!!!!!
December 19th, 2007 at 7:19 amAt first, I wondered why Pres. Bush and his Administration obviously hate our soldiers enough to do nothing about actions of this nature.
Then I remembered, these are soldiers that can no longer fight the occupation in Iraq, and it made total sense why Pres. Bush did nothing at all to stop this egregious behavior. All Pres. Bush had to do was say "Hey, support our troops, stop this behavior!".
Pres. Bush only likes (relatively) healthy troops that he can send to foreign countries to secure the oil. Any other troops (veterans, disabled veterans, retired veterans) are nothing to Pres. Bush.
December 19th, 2007 at 8:05 amJust to make a point, but it is still possible to post as someone else. I just did it. I'm in no way support Hendler. But this registration hasn't stopped this kind of fake posting. btw, I'm not Jason M. Hendler.
December 19th, 2007 at 8:54 amSkip that. I see they blocked the method of posting under you nickname. Nothing to see here.
December 19th, 2007 at 8:56 amTake that BUSHCO!
December 19th, 2007 at 10:43 amI think the majority of enlistees in Bush’s Army come from rural areas, depressed areas, and red states. We often comment about people who vote against their own best interests.
Comment by Marie
Yes, but as liberals, we believe in protecting even dumbasses who vote against their own best interests.
December 19th, 2007 at 11:48 amJason Altmire happens to be my Congressman. Interestly, the veteran who was first affected lives in Mount Lebanon, PA, not in Mr. Altmire's district. The congressman for Mount Lebanon is Repug. Tim Murphy. It took a Democratic Congressman from a neighboring district to actually care about what happened to this veteran. Another shame on Republicans.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:41 pmThose were your exact words, Hendler. Notice the line at the bottom of my post that says 'Comment by Jeremy in Denver - Some Date @ Some Time'. THAT is the signature line. Nobody can sign as you since Registration. One of the reasons registration was created was because of you and yours would do this tactic to disrupt the conversation. You guys lost that war and Registration now protects you as much as it does us.
As for dismissing your posts on merit, you do that just fine all on your own. But your posts aren't intended to stand and fall on their own merit, but to disrupt, hence why I don't see any point in debating you on political issues.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:09 pm