The White House’s war on NYT.
The White House’s war on NYT.
Today, the New York Times reports that at least four legal staffers in the White House participated in discussions about whether to destroy the CIA tapes. The Hill reports:
The White House on Wednesday took the rare step of publicly asking The New York Times to change the sub-headline of a story on the destruction of CIA tapes showing the interrogations of suspected terrorists.
At issue is the story’s sub-headline that stated: “White House Role Was Wider Than It Said.” The White House called this sub-headline inaccurate and demanded that it be corrected.
The Corner has the White House press release. The White House’s main complaint appears to be that they never explicitly said their role was limited. “We have not described — neither to highlight, nor to minimize — the role or deliberations of White House officials in this matter,” the release states, seemingly conceding that more White House staffers could be involved.
UPDATE: In today’s White House Press Briefing, Dana Perino said the New York Times plans to “correct” its subheadline.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Where's Judith Miller when you need some judicious editing, eh?
December 19th, 2007 at 12:42 pmHey Frank... the White House isn't saying the story is false--only that they have never said anything publicly about it previously so it can't be "wider" than what they have let on.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:43 pmAh yes, Frank M advocating BIG GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP.
-GSD
December 19th, 2007 at 12:44 pmI agree with Frank M, the article should be pitched and and new one detailing ALL the crimes the bush adminstration has commited over the past 7 years should be detailed. The article, or special edition, should then call for the immediate impeachment of bush and cheney, then the trials of all the crooks.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:45 pmDEEEP AND WIIIIDE...
DEEEP AND WIIIDE ....
THERE'S CORRUPTION FLOWING DEEP AND WIIIIIDE....
December 19th, 2007 at 12:46 pm#7 comment more than cancels out #6...
December 19th, 2007 at 12:48 pmIf the sub headline was misleading, then change it, by all means, but EXPOSE the CORRUPT underbelly of this snake.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:48 pmFrank...real Patriots aren't afraid to stand up TO government, not only FOR government. I guess you'll go back to being a "patriot" when Hillary is elected.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:49 pmOnly a few more degrees of separation before the spotlight is solely on Dumbya...
C'mon Shrub, think of Impeachment as a badge of honor, like every other failure in your pathetic life.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:50 pmGive "Frank M" a break. He's a George Bush patriot which is different than an American patriot.
An American patriot values the constitution and the rule of law.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:51 pmPatriotism is knowing when your government is guilty of corruption, lies and cover up detrimental to a Democracy. Patriotism means cleaning house and ridding the virus killing our Nation. Doesn't matter Republican or Democrat....when sick...cure it.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:52 pmQuestion: Why does the White House get advance notice of what the NYT is printing? I would think that with true freedom of the press, content wouldn't have to be run through the WH filter before publishing.
Of course, it IS possible that the WH took issue with the subheading AFTER the paper was published, and demanded a correction for subsequent editions. Any citizen (including those in the WH) who feels a printed story (or headline) is inaccurate can voice an objection -- particularly if the story is about them. The paper can print a retraction, correct the story for subsequent editions of that paper, or ignore the request altogether.
In this case, the WH is contesting on a technicality -- did they ever "say" how wide the WH role was in the destruction of the tapes? If they didn't, then the NYT needs to change the headline and issue a correction (which will be somewhat hilarious, because the correction will say something along the lines of "the WH never claimed the conspiracy to destroy these tapes was less than it now appears to be").
Personally, I think the WH is in enough trouble. They should leave well enough alone.
December 19th, 2007 at 12:52 pmFrank - Take your head out of the sand and insert back into your tail!
December 19th, 2007 at 12:52 pmFrank M. George Washington was a liberal. Frank, you don't hate the father of our country do you? Do you think Washington's heart was black?
December 19th, 2007 at 12:57 pmEven if it was true, it’s still hurting the nation more than helping it.
Comment by Frank M
That sounds a lot like YOU frank!
December 19th, 2007 at 12:58 pmPlease don't let Frank and his willingness to destroy the Constitution for a false illusion of 'safety' so that he can enjoy his caffe latte derail this ....
The real issue is an attempt by the White House to censor, or at least alter, an article describing illegal activities under their watch. As has been said before, it's usually not the crime... its the coverup that gets you in trouble.....
December 19th, 2007 at 12:59 pmThey should correct the entire article - by deleting it.
Comment by Frank M — December 19, 2007 @ 12:40 pm
That would be double plus good indeed!
December 19th, 2007 at 12:59 pmEven if it was true, it’s still hurting the nation more than helping it.
Comment by Frank M — December 19, 2007 @ 12:45 pm
I heard a lot of this sentiment during the Watergate scandal. Many Americans (mostly Nixon fans) felt that to investigate the criminal doings of that White House only served to damage the country and should cease and desist.
This is like ignoring cancer. If you ignore it and allow it to fester and grow unimpeded, it will eventually destroy you.
Nixon's administration was thoroughly corrupt and needed to be rooted out and ended. And it was. We then had two honest presidents -- Ford and Carter -- who restored a sense of integrity to the office. Looking back, we see that shining a light on the Nixon administration and exposing it, though painful at the time, was far better for the country in the long run than just ignoring it.
Now we have another administration that stinks to high heaven. Every day seems to bring a new revelation of abuse of power. We need to perform some surgery on this, too.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:00 pmEven if it was true, it’s still hurting the nation more than helping it.
Comment by Frank M — December 19, 2007 @ 12:45 pm
You really do hate the Constitution and want censorship. You truly are un-American. I will pay for your flight to Seoul if you promise never to return, from there just head north to the country you must idolize and they practice what you so desire (BTW, dummy Seoul is in South Korea, I saved you having to use the Google)
December 19th, 2007 at 1:02 pmYeah, that damn 'librul' NYT.
You mean the paper that didn't run Chris Dodd's last minute stand against Telcom retroactive immunity?
Hey, NYT, how about a lead story on how Frank M. is continually licking Bush's ass?
December 19th, 2007 at 1:04 pmEven if it was true, it’s still hurting the nation more than helping it.
Comment by Frank M — December 19, 2007 @ 12:45 pm
Tell me, Frank -- did you make this same protest when the media were having a field day over Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky? I mean -- even if the stories about them were true, wasn't it hurting the nation more then helping it to report them?
December 19th, 2007 at 1:05 pmIs the WH stating that they way certain things are described can alter the content? Kind of like how GW changed his rhetoric about Iran from "they have nukes" to "they are attempting to acquire nuclear capabilities"?
Clear as mud.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:05 pmThe Resident claimed at the time this story came out that he didn't know anything about it and, "it will be interesting to see how it all turns out", (not an exact quote but close enough)
So that would indicate that "they" did originally downplay any involvement, thereby making the Times sub-header accurate!
And P.S. Frank M. is Anti-American!
December 19th, 2007 at 1:09 pmOIC. They're not liars. They're just crooks. Glad we got that straightened out.
You know, it might help if they "clarified" what it was that they did, and not just what they said.
And FWIW, if it's open season on demanding retractions or "clarifications" and getting them, then I assume that Joke Line and the WaPo are next in line to comply when others request it ... ha-ha-ha-ha-haaaa-heh, that was funny, Arne, you're such a jokester....
Cheers,
December 19th, 2007 at 1:10 pmyou mean like the way bush "planned" iraq, or the way bush "planned" to fire anyone in his administration who was involved in the treasonous outing of a CIA agent?
me thinks perino can take a long walk off a short cliff
December 19th, 2007 at 1:11 pmFrank M likens patriotism to blindly swallowing whatever the President says.
That is called serfdom.
-GSD
December 19th, 2007 at 1:12 pmFoolish Frank's post #6 is absolutely absurd. I've read some pretty ridiculous things from these reich-wingers, but this one is one of the worst. Pointing out corruption within this failure of an administration isn't helping the country??? Here's some news for you Frank, BushCo has been nothing but a detriment to our country since the day they took office. And ignoring the lies and corruption of these un-American, self-serving fascists doesn't help.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:17 pmWexler’s Impeachment “Petition?â€â€¦
can’t see the signatures…
links to contribute page…
signs you up to help with his campaign for re-election…
link to contribute side by side with the “petitionâ€â€¦
…and Wexler is not a co-sponsor of HR 333…
hmmmm, makes you think, huh?
Wexler’s Impeachment “Petition?â€: Ok… I signed… Now What?
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/ 2007/ 12/ 19/ wexlers-impeachment-petition-ok-i-signed-now-what/
December 19th, 2007 at 1:20 pmI should be deleted from humanity.
Comment by Frank M
I agree Frank M, you should be deleted from humanity, but I would be happy if you were deleted from just our country.
Up Yours Traitor.
Buck Fush
December 19th, 2007 at 1:24 pmWe should delete all the stupid articles running the White House methinks.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:32 pmChange the subtitle or Dana Perino will shoot your dog.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:33 pmFrank your comments do not help persuade people. A dirty house is a dirty house whether it is yours or mine. A strong person will admit his house needs cleaning.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:38 pmfrank prefers heavy starch on his brown shirts
December 19th, 2007 at 1:39 pmEven if it was true, it’s still hurting the nation more than helping it. Comment by Frank M — December 19, 2007 @ 12:45 pm
Please describe how it's hurting the nation? Cite all your examples. We are waiting.....
December 19th, 2007 at 1:40 pm"...Ms Perino also expressed the WH's disappointment that the Backwater-led dog shooting wasn't enough for the NYT to "get the message"
December 19th, 2007 at 1:41 pmFrank has already admitted, repeatedly, to being a fascist. His notion of what "the nation" means has little relationship to democracy. Substitute "the fatherland" for a more accurate assessment of his comments.
December 19th, 2007 at 1:47 pmA Canceled subscription to the NYT is a vote for Democracy.
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 1:57 pm
that's true, but only because it has capitulated to the Nazi White House. We realize how much you hate a free press, speaking of treason.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:00 pmThe New York Times? What’s that?
Oh I remember its the “paper of record†that has turned traitor against its country and now is worried about being prosecuted.
A Canceled subscription to the NYT is a vote for Democracy.
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 1:57 pm
Off your meds I see.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:01 pmThe "People's War on the White House Press Secretary" has been ongoing. Ms Perino opens mouth and out comes lies, misquotes, and disinformation. Yet if, and I still am unconvinced that the NYTimes mis-representing anything on this issue, they are dana-on-the-spot to try to have it corrected.
Don't the barn door hit you in your sorry a$$ on the way out of dodge, Bush Cabal! The people no longer can trust you or believe a word you say. Your credibility is shot, thanks to your own pathological lying on a daily basis.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:11 pmWas the dog shooting story a precurser or foreshadowing attempt by the WH?
December 19th, 2007 at 2:11 pmRighties who are down on the NYT obviously have never read it. It's done more to keep the Cheerleader Prince's "reign of terror" in business than they have, or any other newspaper has.
I guess that's reflective of the decline in literacy we've seen since the R's staged their coup-de-'tarde.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:13 pmI block all White House news at this point and my level of peace has increased. How many disgusting lies can an individual listen to without wanting to wretch in the nearest bathroom?? I did hear through the grapevine that the Chimp was all grins today regarding the new energy bill - a bill which he, incidentally, fought tooth and nail in order to protect his big Oil industry cronies. This guy is a total fraud and seems to get worse every day. I guess that's how it is when lying becomes pathological - the more you lie, the more you believe your own drivel.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:14 pmtombaker: I am rolling! coup de-'tard, indeed! Good one!
December 19th, 2007 at 2:15 pm"Lefty Patriot you think that the whitehouse is equal to the Nazi’s. ROFL!!"
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:05 pm
And you're equal to the spinless citizenry that let the Nazis come to power! You and all of the other Wingnutz that can't see the harm this administration and it's repugnicant and Media enablers have done to our once great Country!
We are now the country that Tortures!
When Facism comes to the US it'll be wrapped in the flag and thumpin' the bible!
What page are you on?
December 19th, 2007 at 2:15 pmIlliterate and Ignorant: Two qualifications for entry into the GOP or this White House administration.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:15 pmFrank is so hilarious. He starts by commenting that the NYT should delete an article because the government doesn't agree with it. Someone says, "Frank, you're advocating government censorship."
Frank's answer: "NO, I'M NOT!"
HILARIOUS!
December 19th, 2007 at 2:16 pmYes. I’m off my meds. LOL. Thanks for that tip.
Is that how you get through the night? Hide under the covers when the big bad boogyman has a differing idea? You use “Hate Speech�
Your so smart “Blue Staterâ€. Someday you should tell us how you do it.
Lefty Patriot you think that the whitehouse is equal to the Nazi’s. ROFL!!
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:05 pm
It's people like you who support Bush who live in fear and act like cowards. I happen to live and work in New York City, I don't allow the possibility of an attack deter me from going about my life. That's what you and your ilk do supporting an administration that is making a mockery of the Constitution, destroying the economy (have you looked at the value of the dollar), making our country hated throughout the world (I travel a lot outdside the country), and making us actually less safe.
And, lastly, it's not your, it's you're.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:17 pmI used to chafe at comparisons between this White House and Hitler, if only because, as an historian, I find the invocation of Hitler and that Nazis altogether too cavalier in contemporary political discourse.
I will say, however, that despite that, no informed individual could fail to note parallels between Bush's theory of the "unitary executive" and Hitler's "Fuhrerprinzip" (Leader Principle) administrative style. Both employed willful and occasionally malicious disregard for the national parliament/legislature, and both explicitly prized loyalty over competency, with equally disastrous results for the efficacy of the bureaucratic apparatus.
Bush is no Hitler, but his leadership style surely harbors echoes of Nazi political philosophy.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:21 pmLooks like chl/fas has yet another moniker.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:21 pmLefty Patriot you think that the whitehouse is equal to the Nazi’s. ROFL!!
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:05 pm
Can't you read plain English? I said the White House WISHES they were equal to the Nazi's. Are all of you rightards brain-damaged?
December 19th, 2007 at 2:22 pmCol Jack,
Shooting holes in rightwing troll logic is like hitting a billboard with an elephant gun.
-GSD
December 19th, 2007 at 2:24 pm"Lefty Patriot you think that the whitehouse is equal to the Nazi’s. ROFL!!"
This comment was made by someone who, in his name, refers to Hillary Clinton as "Hitlery."
Self-awarness is not a strong point for the sociopaths who support this lawless administration.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:25 pmGSD, I agree, but I can't help myself. They just scream for it. This guy crying hard tears over someone comparing the administration tactics to Nazis while referring to Hillary Clinton as "Hitlery" is simply the latest example. Could anyone get dumber?
December 19th, 2007 at 2:27 pmPlease, Please, Please tell all us regular folks what has been mocked.
And last. Did I EVER say I support President Bush? It is you “Brain Trusts†that jumped to that conclusion.
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:27 pm
so is it the case that you only read your own posts? Hitlery is not mockery of a sitting US Senator? i don't really care, nor does she, because we believe in free speech, but your hypocrisy paints you as pure Bushit. Along with your ignorance of Aemrican law and custom.
Just so you'll feel comfortable: Sig Heil!
December 19th, 2007 at 2:31 pmFoolish Bush cultist:
"Please, Please, Please tell all us regular folks what has been mocked."
Separation of powers, adherence to Treaty obligations, separation of church and state to name a few. I'm sure my liberal friends here can think of some more.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:32 pmHitlery: "Did I EVER say I support President Bush?"
Well, set us straight then smart guy. Who'd you vote for in 2000 and 2004?
December 19th, 2007 at 2:33 pmI’m sure my liberal friends here can think of some more.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — December 19, 2007 @ 2:32 pm
Basically, the whole idea of America has been mocked, as have all the founders. The goal of the Bushites and neocons is to weaken America until it is just their bank and employment office. They have shown, many times, that they have more loyalty to Saudi Arabia than to the USA, starting with the 9/11 failure, and enabling the Bin Laden family to escape without even being questioned. That's all I needed to know to push for impeachment, trial and hanging of the whole administration. These are the same people that fought freeing the slaves, women's suffrage, child labor laws, unions, public education, medicare, Social Security, WW2 involvement, and dozens more specifically American advances to freedom and civilized life for all. The wingnuts that visit here to leave their turds of wisdom have one thing in common: pure, screaming cowardice. Their motivation is fear, their fear is based on ignorance and blind loyalty to the very men that put them in danger in the first place.
My dog is smarter than they are.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:39 pm"You call me a coward? That’s great. I live just across the river.
hfdc"
I love it when rightards want to fight on the internet to show that they're not cowards. If they were real men they'd be in Iraq right now, but they're not. They're wearing blisters on their fingers typing for democracy.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:42 pmLet's add using the Justice Department for political purposes and rampant election fraud. And my favorite insignificant constitutional crime: breaking the terms of the 14th Amendment by claiming publically, over and over, that Treasury bills are "worthless pieces of paper."
And again, Hitlery, if you're NOT a Bush supporter, set us straight and tell us who you voted for in 2000 and 2004. I'll start. In 2000, I voted for Gore and in 2004, I voted for Kerry. Come on you sniveling little coward, put up or shut up and crawl back into your stinking little hole.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:44 pmHfDC - I think it's called the "Establishment Clause". It's not a "law" pe se, but something even more important - a "fundamental, or founding, principle".
If the Founders were less than clear on some of these issues, it is only because they could not envision anyone so craven and callow as to abjure those fundamental principles. Present-day Righties have proven them insufficiently pessimistic as to the eventual "character" of some players on the national stage.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:45 pmHitlery: "Col. Jack yopu first. Please tell all us dopes where you fine the “separation of church and state†in our beloved Constitution?"
It's in the Bill of Rights, dumbass. "Congress shall pass no law..." The administration's Faith-based charity operation arguably violates that part of the consitution. If you don't think it does, make a reasonable argument to that effect.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:46 pmI seriously doubt one such as you could inspire fear in anyone, HfDC, unless you're left at home with the children at times.
None of us are dumb enough to buy the line that the Republicans of the 1860's bear any resemblance to today's R's.
Too bad you have to go that far back in history to find an example of a good Republican. Too bad also, that you have the R's of today to represent you.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:48 pmDear Your mom is being chased by hillary
If you're really interested in understanding the separtion of church and state follow the link.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:48 pmhttp://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_reli.html
If you're really just interested in sputtering and spitting at your computer screen, bite me.
Hitlery, re-read your posts. You still haven't made an argument on anything. Do you have an argument or are you too stupid to formulate an argument on any of the nonsense you're vomiting out around here?
December 19th, 2007 at 2:49 pm"You fools are best medicine. Rarely do you read such conspiracy tinfoil hat nonsense. You call me a coward? That’s great. I live just across the river. We should meet and talk. HAHAHA"
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:27 pm
I'm your huckelberry, say when.
Coward.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:49 pmHitlery: "You mean like when Hitlery committed election fraud when she ran for Senate in NY?"
OK, now we could be close to an argument. Could you be more specific so someone with brains could respond?
December 19th, 2007 at 2:50 pmIt's pretty obivious that hircd is a sniveling moronic coward, even by troll standards. He has no game and isn't worth engaging.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:51 pmBut he THINKS he's so smart, Bob. Of course, you are right. I've been asking for an argument. If I don't see one soon, I promise I'll start ignoring him.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:53 pmI guess it should have been obvious that we were dealing with a crazy person. While referring to himself as "Hitlery..." he cried bitter tears over comparing the Bush administration to Nazis.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:55 pmOK, so no cogent argument is forthcoming. Time's up! Go get another oxycontin and take a nappy.
December 19th, 2007 at 2:58 pmI live just across the river. We should meet and talk. HAHAHA
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:27 pm
Why would I ever want to meet you, B & T
December 19th, 2007 at 3:01 pmI am so disappointed. Whenever someone wearing a tinfoil hat has their delusion confronted they become violent name callers.
Whew… My typing skills are being tested. So many morons so little bandwidth.
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:57 pm
ROTFL! Yeah, because you NEVER NAME CALLED in that post!!! ;)
December 19th, 2007 at 3:03 pmWhew… My typing skills are being tested. So many morons so little bandwidth.
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:57 pm
A member of the 24% dead enders, fanatics, bigots, religious zealots, and just plain dumb calling others a moron, that's rich.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:03 pmCol. Jack its so easy for you. When your delusion is confronted you simply say. “That guy is crazy†and continue to pick lint out of your navel.
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 3:02 pm
Well to be fair, that IS the correct response when confronted by someone that IS CRAZY ;)
December 19th, 2007 at 3:04 pmWell, it's just P, after all. There won't be a lick of sense, nor a word of truth, in any of Hitlery P's posts. Ignore and flag, it's all that can be done. She won't show up for a fight, she won't post any proof or links, she won't make any sense, and she certainly won't make America proud. She willlerect straw man after straw man, which anybody here will torch instantly and completely, and she will find another lie to spin.
flag and ignore.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:11 pmReligion and good morals are the only solid foundation of public liberty and happiness.†—Samuel Adams
Oh yea you HATE him he is one of those “24% dead enders, fanatics, bigots, religious zealots, and just plain dumb†just like you said.
This is so much fun!!
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 3:07 pm
The quote mentions Good morals. People who support torture, illegal wiretapping, rendition, outlawing habeus corpus, running up massive deficits, denying and attacking science, etc. do not have good morals. This is too easy.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:12 pmEven if it was true, it’s still hurting the nation more than helping it.
Comment by Frank M
No, that appears to be your job, Frank M.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:13 pmSee, I told you she wouldn't be able to prove any of her lies.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:14 pmLooks like poor P will be tortured for a good long time, since Hillary is either going to be a two-term president, or a senator for life.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:15 pmOf course, P will never be elected dog-catcher, since one has to be smarter than the prey.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:16 pmIts my nap time. THis has been too funny.
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 3:16 pm
You should be awake before you type, and yes, it's too funny, since Clinton left the largest surplus in history. Enjoy the presence of Mrs. Clinton on the political scene for many years to come, and enjoy the rest of your lifelong nap, P.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:18 pmOf course I'm feeling better. It always amuses me to shred you in public, even though it's no challenge to speak of. How you live with it bespeaks a very low self-esteem, but that goes with wingnuttia and rightardism.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:20 pm"It’s a shame you can answer my Hitlery Fraud claim. I was so hoping that you would.
hfdc"
I know i shouldn't respond, but, you're lying to change the subject. idiot.
"Oh yes “running up massive deficits†when the Clinton crime family did it was “For the good of the Countryâ€.
hfdc"
you really are mentally challenged aren't you. clinton managed to erase the reagan deficits, and his only crime was lying about cheating on his wife so he wouldn't get caught.
how is anything you've said even remotely connected to bush censoring the msm?
December 19th, 2007 at 3:24 pmHitlery?
Ohhh, you mean BUSHitlery!!!
Now I get it.
Just another azs-licker of MURDERER BusHitler the COXUCKER punk TRAITOR to the USA.
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
December 19th, 2007 at 3:26 pm# 78 Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 2:57 pm
What's the matter Hitlery. I am only accepting your invitation, "I live just across the river. We should meet and talk. HAHAHAâ€
Or was that just more of the same nonsense you've been spouting all day? Typical of you wingnut blowhards... make a threat then cry foul when you get called on it. More of the It's ok when we do it but when you do it, it's wrong mentality.
Crawl back up Cheney's ass you neocon turd.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:26 pmThe BEST thing about MURDERER BusHitler the COXUCKER punk TRAITOR to the USA is that when he finally DROPS DEAD and
goes to hell, he will be with his MASTER Satan for ETERNITY, who LOVES BusHitler's EVIL DOINGS.
Satan will SMASH BusHitler's face EVERY SECOND for ETERNITY!
WHAM! SPLAT!
WHAM! SPLAT!
WHAM! SPLAT!
WHAM! SPLAT!
WHAM! SPLAT!
WHAM! SPLAT!
WHAM! SPLAT!
WHAM! SPLAT!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
December 19th, 2007 at 3:30 pmre 101:
you hit the nail on the head with the "More of the It’s ok when we do it but when you do it, it’s wrong mentality." This is the logic behind every rightwingnut out there. From the pres, to the preachers, to politicians, to the pointyheadedtrolls. They can dish it out but they can't take it.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:31 pmBusHitler is a COXUCKER punk TRAITOR to the USA who will BURN IN HELL FOR ETERNITY for his EVIL DEEDS.
Along with MORON and TRAITOR Reagan.
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
December 19th, 2007 at 3:33 pmHere's another quote by Samuel Adams that is more apropos for this thread:
"How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!"
December 19th, 2007 at 3:35 pmre 102:
let's make a deal, you stop lying and I'll stop telling the truth.
If you think that the clinton economy was a train wreak, provide some evidence that backs up your assertion. If you think Clinton's adminstration had more scandals, mention some. It's not my job to make your arguments for you. idiot.
When are you going to honor your challenge to TheRadicalRightisRadicallyWrong?
December 19th, 2007 at 3:35 pmTRAITOR BusHitler will be going to JAIL for his TREASON against the USA.
Jailed for life, until he DROPS DEAD and goes to be with his
MASTER SATAN and TRAITOR MORON Reagan.
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
December 19th, 2007 at 3:35 pmBob,
What I have never been able to figure out is what kinda crazy upside down black is white, white is black world do they live on that they just can't seem to see the hypocrisy of their words and actions?
I mean for godsake, everytime you turn around another famliy-values-we-hate-gays-GOP-nuttbagg is falling out of the tree for having an affair with another person of either sexual persuasion. and yet these locksteppers just keep fallin' in line and repeating that mantra.
It would be funny if...they weren't destroying this country with their hatred and criminallity!
December 19th, 2007 at 3:39 pmI guess the NYT was winging it on that one. Oops, better get that advanced copy to the WH for review a bit sooner.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:40 pmYet another thread turned into troll attention-grabbing. "Hey! It's all about me!"
This troll is really good at it, and is getting plenty of enabling.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:42 pmNow I know why there used to be a liberal bias in the media. Every one knows that the truth has a liberal bias, now that the conglomerates control the news that liberal bias has gone the way of truth.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:42 pmTRAITOR MORON Reagan is BURNING IN HELL for his EVIL ACTS.
BusHitler will follow in due time...
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
December 19th, 2007 at 3:44 pmre 110
yeah, it's easier to just assume that whatever these people are railing against is what they're up to their asses in. Whether it's sexual "sin". political corruption, theocratic facism, anynomous buttsex, etc. I keep hoping that one of the republican cantidopes will come out against honesty. It's our only hope.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:45 pm"I am so scared right now. You have really crossed the line. I never expected a PeaceNik like you to be so violent.
Someone please help me. I’m being threatened."
Comment by Hitlery for Dog Catcher — December 19, 2007 @ 3:33 pm
I know you are, I can smell it on you. Smells like P_$$y. Bush wears that same scent when he's swaggering about "Bring 'em on" Cause he knows he doesn't have to do his own fighting. He'll send our brave men and women and then dress up and pretend to be tough, just like you're doing here.
I don't remember ever claiming to be a peacenik, though? Just more wishful thinking on your part so you wouldn't have to have that tugboat ass of yours back up that battleship mouth you've got going, I guess?
December 19th, 2007 at 3:47 pmre:116 You mean they haven't already? ;)
December 19th, 2007 at 3:51 pmWhitewater, right, Zero.
Blue dress, excellent, real national security issue, well worth the $50 million.
Biggest tax increase, Reagan.
Bombing an aspirin factory, which Clinton was the targeting officer?
White house travel office, nothing, zero.
FBI files, nothing, zero. Rose law firm, nothing, zero.
Sandy Berger, copies of his own writings. Deep, very deep.
Any more bullshit I can shoot down without trying?
December 19th, 2007 at 3:53 pmWhitewater: a twenty year old land deal that the clintons lost money on. that was worth the 80 million dollars to dig up.
Blue Dress:tied to the bj, see comment above about the value
Biggest Tax increase in history: Setting aside the "Biggest" part for the moment, this lead to the fastest growing economny the country ever experienced. Clinton was able to wipe out the rrecord breaking reagan deficet. I can see why you'd be pissed about that.
Bombing an asprin factory: A good faith effort to fight terrorists. I can see why you'd be against fighting Bin Laden seeing as how he and your boy bush are so tight.
Whitehouse Travel office: this is to petty, even for you. and Clinton fired those involved.
FBI Files: see above
Rose Law Firm records: see above
Having flunkys steal documents and then stuff them down their pants: this is a right wing fabrication. Berger didn't stuff them down his pants. (what is is with you wankers and other peoples' pants?) he accidently got some papers mixed up with his own, he's been prosecuted and paid his debt to society. Unlike Scooter, for instance.
If this is the sum of your list, you might want to go back to school. idiot.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:55 pmCome on , P, google is your friend. You should be able to find some more rightwing fantasies to post to show what a weak, deluded liar you are. We understand your envy, since you're stuck trying to live down the most incompetent, cowardly, dishonest administration in US history. Too bad, that's what you have to live with, it sucks to be you.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:56 pm"It’s easy to threaten a hate crime on an anon Blog. Lets see if you really mean what you say.
I need convincing!!
hfdc"
He merely responded to your threat whiny boy. back up your words coward. What is it about wingnuts and hatecrimes anyway? you cowards just have to fabricate them.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:57 pmYou can't say when, can you? You ain't no daisy.
I didn't make the threat. You did. But you're too stupid to see that.
Now slither away, little boy.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:58 pmTroll Haiku
Sitting in mom's basement
December 19th, 2007 at 4:09 pmunderpants dirty, mom's yelling
Don't stain the couch again
It's pathetic that trolls can't even take the time to come up with their own slogans, they have to borrow phrases like "Crime Family" from Mike Malloy and Thom Hartmann.
December 19th, 2007 at 4:12 pmPathetic.
TheRadicalRightisRadicallyWrong WHEN. Now dance coward.
HATECRIME!HATECRIME!HATECRIME!
Seriously, meet him in minnieapolis, third stall from the left in the airport. you know the place.
December 19th, 2007 at 4:16 pmhaiku no 2
Troll Logic
Look in the mirror
December 19th, 2007 at 4:17 pmhate the pimples, puss, and ugly
it's clinton's fault!
RUCerious: "It’s pathetic that trolls can’t even take the time to come up with their own slogans, they have to borrow phrases like “Crime Family†from Mike Malloy and Thom Hartmann."
No kidding. Truly an indication of a weak, uninformed mind. The Bush-Walker clan dates back to the 1830's. Bush was the 17th legacy from his family at Yale. It's a string of legacies which goes back to 1840.
By contrast, the Clinton family began in the 1980's. It dates back to.... Clinton marrying Hillary Rodham!
The Bush-Walker clan's history includes stealing the bones of Geronimoe from a national museum, complicity in an attempted coup in 1933, indictments under the Trading with the Enemy Act for providing banking services to the Nazis during WWII, numerous insider trading scandals over the decades.
December 19th, 2007 at 4:29 pmThe Bush-Walker clan’s history includes stealing the bones of Geronimoe from a national museum, complicity in an attempted coup in 1933, indictments under the Trading with the Enemy Act for providing banking services to the Nazis during WWII, numerous insider trading scandals over the decades.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — December 19, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Yup. The BusHitler TREASON FAMILY are COXUCKER punk TRAITORS to the USA, who ALL need to be TORTURED in Gitmo until DEAD.
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nutes
December 19th, 2007 at 4:48 pmThis Rabbinical hairsplitting distracts from the bottom line: four White House thugs were involved in an act of court-defying destruction of evidence of ciminal misconduct and international war crimes! Focus, damn you, focus! Keep your eyes on the sparrows!
December 19th, 2007 at 4:49 pmre: 134
You couldn't be more right!
What will it take to prosecute this criminal administration?
December 19th, 2007 at 5:25 pmRe: 129
Hitlery, With the when came an implied WHERE and WHEN
But you knew that. Smells like Teen Spirit...
December 19th, 2007 at 5:27 pmRe:130
I don't know where it is aside from the pictures I've seen but I would bet Hitlery does... ;)
December 19th, 2007 at 5:29 pm...I should read: "CIA destruction of evidence. WHITE HOUSE GUILTY!"
December 19th, 2007 at 9:37 pmIn Brazil, the 1.70 real is buying one US Dollar. In Brazil, the 1.70 real is buying one US Dollar.I'm sure Bin Laden is reading all this in some place in Saudi Arabia laughing his head off and thanking Alah for sending Bush to America!
December 19th, 2007 at 9:48 pm