Pentagon weighs Afghanistan surge.
By on Jan 9th, 2008 at 10:05 pm
Pentagon weighs Afghanistan surge.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is “considering sending some 3,000 additional marines to Afghanistan to boost forces ahead of a Taliban spring offensive. … Currently, there are 26,000 US troops in Afghanistan, most of them under the 40,000-strong NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.” Last year was the deadliest for U.S. troops in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Hannity
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
Kristol
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Maddow
McCain
Media
Military
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Public Plan
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
And you’ll lead the charge,right out front…right Mr. Gates?
January 9th, 2008 at 10:08 pmGeorge Bush: There’s no problem that can’t be solved if you throw enough lives at it.
January 9th, 2008 at 10:09 pmI wonder if there’ll be a spring 2023 Taliban offensive that we’ll be sending troops in to combat?
January 9th, 2008 at 10:11 pm“And we’ll fight them over there”, “and over there”, “and a few more over there”, “and those guys too, as long as we’re there”!
“Don’t worry”. “We’ll only need them there for a while”.
January 9th, 2008 at 10:13 pmI thought this was where the terrorists were when all of this horseshit started…what happened?!! Why Iraq? Why Iran? Why didn’t we go after Bin Laden, why didn’t we fight a war in Pakistan and Afghanistan? Some body hep me!
January 9th, 2008 at 10:13 pmoh… … you’re welcome…
January 9th, 2008 at 10:20 pmBlah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban blah blah blah surge blah blah blah taliban…
January 9th, 2008 at 10:23 pm“oceans no longer protect us”…
but we must “fight them over there so we don’t have to know how bad it is and can hide the coffins and fix the numbers and keep making money off the wasted bombs and bullets and keep the contractors busy cause we need to create jobs… doncha know… … ”
planned chaos…
January 9th, 2008 at 10:25 pm“We’re Making Enemies Faster than We Can Kill Them”
January 9th, 2008 at 10:27 pmGee, our Marines will get some much-needed R&R in Afghanistan to recuperate from their service in Iraq. And after awhile, they can go back to Iraq for some R&R from their service in Afghanistan.
January 9th, 2008 at 10:31 pmand, while on his “peace tour”:
JERUSALEM (CNN) – The war of words between United States and Tehran continued Wednesday, with President Bush repeating his assertion that Iran is “a threat to world peace.”
[...]
Bush’s criticism of Iran came Wednesday during a news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem. Bush is in the region to encourage the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.
[...]
as if peace with iran has nothing to do with all of that…
check out that picture there… always with the smirk…
January 9th, 2008 at 10:52 pmGDumbya’s First Law of the Universe:
“All I have is a hammer . . . so every problem must be a nail.”
Translation: “All I have is a bunch of botched wars . . . so every solution must be a surge.”
January 9th, 2008 at 11:02 pmI don’t wish to derail, but, what amazes me are the actual pictures of the “Iranian Speed-boat” incident. I was ecpecting something like a more modern T.V. show than McChale’s Navy.
No offense to the Iranian “Navy”, but I could buy a more formidable “Naval Vessel” from “Bob down off the Interstate”. And probably match their “firepower” from my own gun-safe and kitchen cabinet.
January 9th, 2008 at 11:07 pmImpolitics –> yup, that Iranian Navy is pretty provocative, isn’t it?
And now GDumbya is farting around in the Middle East and wagging his little finger at Iran over the “incident”. I don’t mind it so much when GDumbya makes himself look like the idiot that he is but now he’s making us all look bad. Again.
January 9th, 2008 at 11:11 pmBack on topic:
I haven’t seen anyone “connecting dots” between the reported “success”, of the surge, with the need for more troops in Afghanistan. (Though, as I recall, that would pretty much use up the number actually going home as a “draw-down” of the surge.)
Specifically, how many “terrorists” are “fighting us at home” in Afghanistan rather than “fighting us over there” in Iraq?
January 9th, 2008 at 11:12 pmComment by tom — January 9, 2008 @ 11:11 pm
I prefer to think that moderates are hoping he doesn’t represent the U.S. mainstream. And his international reputation, as a bumbling boob, is well established. He can still do some damage but I don’t think many take him that seriously anymore. I hope.
I still won’t feel comfortable until he, his family, his friends, parnters, co-conspirators and acquaintances are out of the chain of command.
January 9th, 2008 at 11:17 pmThe draft will be blamed on Clinton.
January 9th, 2008 at 11:25 pm“oceans no longer protect usâ€â€¦
Comment by katy — January 9, 2008 @ 10:25 pm
Don’t forget “We tried calm.”
As for your assertion of “planned chaos,” amen, sister…Amen!
January 9th, 2008 at 11:55 pmbtw…..the last i heard it was going to be marines only and because they project a spring uprise. meaning they know it will be one because they will start one. just in case my ass
January 10th, 2008 at 1:06 amThe draft will be blamed on Clinton.
Comment by Roket — January 9, 2008 @ 11:25 pm
Be careful when you mention the name “Clinton”, Roket. There are a lot of Clinton bashers lurking around this web site.
January 10th, 2008 at 1:28 amPoor delafield.
January 10th, 2008 at 1:30 amWhen you support a poorly disguised right-winger don’t be surprised if some liberals take issue with it. NAFTA.
January 10th, 2008 at 1:34 amPoor delafield.
Comment by Sabyen91 — January 10, 2008 @ 1:30
Hello Saby. How are you today?
January 10th, 2008 at 1:42 amI am a Liberal, but I beg to differ from the crowd. Gates is the sole bastion of sanity in the G. W. administration. G. H. W. slipped him in under Cheney’s line of fire and now the foxes are trying to get back into the hen house. Gates wants to refocus the war on terror back to where it deserves attention, Afghanistan (and potentially – Pakistan). Cheney wants to go back to where the oil is. For the last ten months, Cheney seems to have vanished into the woodwork, except for a few free-fire game hunts and fishing expeditions where dynamite is the preferred bait.
January 10th, 2008 at 1:46 amDandy, delafield. And in a pissy mood. I may be overly aggressive tonight and for that I apologize.
January 10th, 2008 at 1:50 amDandy, delafield. And in a pissy mood. I may be overly aggressive tonight and for that I apologize.
Comment by Sabyen91 — January 10, 2008 @ 1:50 am
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
I have to hit the hay. I took a sleeping pill about an hour ago and I can’t hold my head up anymore. I’ll catch you later. Sorry about that.
January 10th, 2008 at 2:11 amNight delafield. Have a good night’s sleep.
January 10th, 2008 at 2:12 amOkay, here’s the thing . . .
January 10th, 2008 at 2:44 amAny scumbag politician that provokes an invasion should be the first
one over there on the front line.
If he or she wants it . . . he or she better damn well step up and prove
that they believe in the action they’re calling for.
GWB is the weakest excuse for a ‘decider guy’ anyone has ever seen.
Do us all a favor Laura, throw his stupid ass under the moving bus.
No . . wait . . . it’s ‘decider’ and ‘commander guy’ . . sorry for the confusion.
January 10th, 2008 at 2:45 amSurge! The sequel. Coming to a desert near you! Spring 2008.
A follow up to the blockbuster you couldn’t get enough of.
January 10th, 2008 at 5:37 amAfghanistan’s a mess because Cheney-Bush wanted revenge on Saddam and siphoned needed forces away before finishing the job against bin Laden and the Taliban because, as draft-dodgers and AWOLer’s, they understood “victory” only as a slogan for election campaigns and “warfare” only as a cover to drain the treasury.
January 10th, 2008 at 6:59 amDoc Rock:
It’s all about the oil. Any other excuse Bush gives is a lie.
January 10th, 2008 at 8:34 amThe US has just dropped 40,000 pounds of bombs in Baghdad in 10 minutes to strike at “Al Qaeda” targets.
You know the Al Qaeda we were told was just about run out of Iraq in December.
Well, I hope the McCainiacs have plans for their children to be sent to Iran and Pakistan and Syria.
-GSD
January 10th, 2008 at 9:11 amWhy is a surge needed in Afghanistan?
I thought Afghanistan was this administration’s real success story…
/sarcasm off
January 10th, 2008 at 1:04 pm