Comment by good_golly

Did they state if any were traceable to the thousands of weapons (and tons of ammo) that the defense department says disappeared in Iraq?

That would be good news – of a sort.

But I thought the Army didn’t do bodycounts. Or is that so 2003?

Comment by RickS — January 14, 2008 @ 4:37 pm

Why assume anything they say is true? And why assume that the the dead were Al Qaeda? It says “suspected” militants. Since when are suspects murdered and the murderers praised? Besides in Giuliani’s new York, that is? What happened to Americans that the Rule Of Law has been trampled and tossed? is this the inevitable result of awarding the White House to a murderer and sociopath?

Wasn’t Jesus A Liberal?

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1019-24.htm

“I am here trying to inform liberals that liberalism is biblically wrong. There are moral and ethical guidelines that must be followed.”

Comment by Daryll — January 14, 2008 @ 10:25 am

Meanwhile Jesus was one of the most liberal of historical figures.

‘Liberalism as defined by Webster’s Third New International Dictionary: “a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of man, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for tolerance and freedom for the individual from arbitrary authority in all spheres of life…”’

‘Jesus was the ultimate liberal progressive revolutionary of all history.’

‘He aligned Himself with the poor and the oppressed. He challenged the religious orthodoxy of His day. He advocated pacifism and loving our enemies. He liberated women and minorities from oppression. He healed on the Sabbath and forgave adulterers and prostitutes. He associated with drunks and other social outcasts. He rebuked the religious right of His day because they embraced the letter of the law instead of the Spirit. He loved sinners and called them to Himself. Jesus was the original Liberal.’

Doesn’t sound like Jesus would condone a father torching his daughter (as daryll instructs us) if she turned to prostitution! Sounds like daryll and his church quote Jesus when it suits them and the old testament with that suits them even more!

“Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

“Blessed are the meek: for they shall posses the land.”

“Blessed are they who mourn: for they shall be comforted.”

“Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice: for they shall have their fill.”

“Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy……..”

(then, from the back of the multitude gathered)

Darryll: “Hey, I got one: ‘Blessed are the employed, for they won’t have to mooch off their friends!’ Get a damn haircut and a job, hippie!!!”

First off, kudos to US forces.

But I thought the Army didn’t do bodycounts. Or is that so 2003?

Let me guess: “Made in America, shipped with Allah’s blessing to our Wahabbi brothers in the Iraqi insurgency. Yours sincerely Saudi Prince xy or z”

P.S. “There’s another $20billion worth on the way, brothers”

You know, if I were a Congressman, I think I’d have to lead off with “Were these tapes destroyed because they showed some illegal activities being done? That’s the only rational explanation I could possibly conceive. Hasn’t it been a long-held concept of certain people in the White House and their allies in Congress that ‘if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn’t be afraid’?”

Comment by katy — January 14, 2008 @ 12:36 pm

That’s the thing about bias. It is so subjective

oh… just dropped by for a swift kick, huh…

actually, TP could use a bit MORE “censorship”, utilizing that red flag…

but the agenda has been there from the beginning…
that’s why we need more posters to help drown out that bias…
…

Comment by Daryll — January 14, 2008 @ 10:25 am

Actually, whether or not you realize it, Daryll, what you are trying to do is convince open-minded, 21st century people that words written thousands of years ago (you like to quote the Old Testament a lot) about how humans should behave, based on an ignorant understanding of the world and its inhabitants (they didn’t know that there were people living on this continent back then) should form the moral framework of how we live today. They didn’t know what they were talking about back then, and they know even less today.

Listen, I truly believe in the Good Samaritan, but I refuse to help people who continuously make mistakes.

Comment by Daryll — January 14, 2008 @ 10:28 am

Tell us, Daryll, how you know that the man lying on the side of the road has been making the same mistake over and over unless you first go offer to help him? You sound like you want to assume that every poor person, every person who finds himself in distress, is guilty of the repeatedly using bad judgment, and you appear to want to “pre-judge” all of them so that you don’t have to help. The Good Samaritan didn’t ask questions, he just helped someone in need. Shouldn’t you be doing that?

Jesus does not reward constant foolishness.

Comment by Daryll — January 14, 2008 @ 10:33 am

Then the logical conclusion would be that Jesus will not be rewarding President Bush or Vice President Cheney, will He?

It also appears that you also proceed from the false assumption that to have morals, one must believe God. This is probably one of the most incorrect of your beliefs. But don’t worry about me going to Hell. I won’t, because it doesn’t exist.

I hope the weather is nice in whatever reality you currently reside. Vaya con dios.

(Maybe MSNBC excluded Kucinich for not providing health care for his staff?)

Picture Caption: Look ma, no ethics, morals or truth!

If TP had included the part that said “with a president they found physically and sexually attractive”, I would not have jumped to the erroneous conclusion that there are Democrats out there who want to have sex with George Bush. Please, TP. Inlcude just a little more accuracy, please? Thank you.

Clinton=Cleveland…
Freudian slip?

LOL.

Good one, Wilco…

/wipe coffee from face

Comment by katy — January 14, 2008 @ 11:29 am

Secure undisclosed location – not commenting on TP these days, too much censorship and obvious agenda.