Think Progress

Huckabee equates homosexuality with bestiality.

By Faiz on Jan 17th, 2008 at 2:25 pm

Huckabee equates homosexuality with bestiality.»

TPM’s Greg Sargent notes that in a recent interview with Beliefnet, Mike Huckabee equated homosexuality with bestiality. Asked whether he wanted to bring the Constitution into conformity with the Bible, the former Arkansas Governor answered this way:

Well, I don’t think that’s a radical view to say we’re going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal.

Americablog has more.




Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

278 Responses to “Huckabee equates homosexuality with bestiality.”

  1. Red Pill Says:

    Did changing the “definition of marriage” to permit people of different ethnicities to marry lead to any of this? Will we ever escape Jim Crow or some variant therein? Huckabee is an affront to reason.


  2. And Yet... Says:

    Mike the Huck shit-cans himself yet again as a possible candidate, causing all but lunatic fringers to conclude, “Who in hell wants this in the WH?”

    Keep on talking, Huck. GO, Huck, GO…


  3. PatrioticLiberalChristian Says:

    Rick? Rick Santorum? Is that you, Rick?


  4. RUCerious Says:

    PLC, beat me to it dammit.~!~


  5. RUCerious Says:

    Here in the fine state of Washington, we had a guy killed while trying to hump a horse.
    Lightning would have been more appropriate, but I doubt Huck’s god hand a hand in this fellow’s demise.


  6. RUCerious Says:

    He left out the child/animal combo!


  7. zuch Says:

    Huckabee:

    “Well, I don’t think that’s a radical view to say we’re going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal.”

    Hmmmmm. A sly jab at someone there?!?!?

    Cheers,


  8. robbez_92107 Says:

    How about Man-on-Dog Santorum for Vice Huckabee?


  9. Shayne Says:

    I’m beginning to think this guy is a “parody candidate” because nobody could legitimately pull of loonier than W, could they?


  10. oldtree Says:

    He is an expert on the subject of both. He is particularly keen on the interaction of the two species. He is the first candidate to openly come out as an expert on perversion. He has to win for all mankind on dog.


  11. Badmoodman Says:

    “…a man and animal.”

    What, they have a problem with Platonic marriages? Hell, the Republicans should be VERY familiar with Platonic marriages, right Sen. Craig?


  12. Wayne Says:

    Lightning would have been more appropriate, but I doubt Huck’s god hand a hand in this fellow’s demise.

    Comment by RUCerious — January 17, 2008 @ 2:35 pm

    Sounds like a Darwin Award candidate.


  13. Shayne Says:

    Here in the fine state of Washington, we had a guy killed while trying to hump a horse.
    Lightning would have been more appropriate, but I doubt Huck’s god hand a hand in this fellow’s demise.

    Comment by RUCerious — January 17, 2008 @ 2:35 pm

    Horse - 1, Evangelicon - O


  14. republicans hate facts Says:

    Maybe that’s because when HUCK does it, he prefers it BEASTIE STYLE? ;)


  15. dim wit Says:

    Comment by RUCerious — January 17, 2008 @ 2:35 pm

    not to be picky, but I do believe the horse was humping him.

    Either way, I understand your point regarding sex outside of marriage.


  16. Wilco Says:

    RUC, was that a couple years ago?
    And if so, wasn’t he the hump-ee?
    And didn’t his good friend video tape it and multiple other acts of bestiality?
    And that story still makes me laugh. Died from a ruptured sphincter.


  17. Fred Says:

    and this is not facism?


  18. Shayne Says:

    I wonder if his son molested that dog before he hung him.


  19. Bobwurst Says:

    it’s just safer to assume that republicans really want to have interspecies sex. They’re the only ones who talk about it.


  20. Shayne Says:

    Maybe that’s because when HUCK does it, he prefers it BEASTIE STYLE? ;)

    Comment by republicans hate facts — January 17, 2008 @ 2:37 pm

    Have you seen his wife? I’m just saying …


  21. Tomas Says:

    I equate huckabee with gringoality.


  22. Wilco Says:

    Have you seen his wife? I’m just saying …

    Comment by Shayne

    That’s a little bit of a low blow.


  23. Shayne Says:

    Correction:

    horse - 2, retardicon - 0


  24. Red Pill Says:

    Stewart and Colbert don’t need their writers with this lot. The jokes write themselves!


  25. Shayne Says:

    That’s a little bit of a low blow.

    Comment by Wilco — January 17, 2008 @ 2:42 pm

    Well I’m a woman so I can get away with it, just don’t you try it. /sarc


  26. republicans hate facts Says:

    Have you seen his wife? I’m just saying …
    Comment by Shayne — January 17, 2008 @ 2:41 pm

    Well it DOES explain why he spends SO MUCH OF HIS TIME THINKING ABOUT GAY SEX!! ;)


  27. PatrioticLiberalChristian Says:

    If you go just below the surface of what some of the Christian Pharisees say about us liberals, they consider us all Satan’s (”the beast”) children. So, they probably equate sex with a liberal as bestiality, too.


  28. And Yet... Says:

    Hey, you don’t have the market cornered, RUCerious @ 5. Down here in CA we had a guy out in front of La Purisima mission near Lompoc who was…well just take a read:

    Lompoc, FROM SANTA MARIA TIMES
    Man arrested acting on sheep ‘fantasy’

    Santa Barbara County sheriff’s deputies found a bizarre scene Wednesday morning when they stopped outside the La Purisima Mission to investigate an empty car.

    Thinking they would find a suspect trespassing on state park property, deputies discovered 69-year-old Alfred Thomas Steven of Huntington Beach naked and coated in olive oil and oats in the sheep enclosure.

    When deputies confronted Steven, they found that he had a loaded .357 revolver, officials said. Steven also allegedly admitted that he was enacting a fantasy and he drove up to the mission, at 2295 Purisima Road, from Huntington Beach for that purpose.

    Steven was arrested on misdemeanor charges of trespassing on state park property, animal cruelty, sexually assaulting an animal, and possession of a loaded firearm, deputies said.

    Park rangers were called to help with the investigation, and Steven was eventually released with a citation, officials said.

    No animals were hurt in the incident, according to deputies.


  29. republicans hate facts Says:

    I wonder if his son molested that dog before he hung him.
    Comment by Shayne — January 17, 2008 @ 2:39 pm

    Only if it was a BOY DOG ;)


  30. Wilco Says:

    Shayne, see what you started?


  31. Shayne Says:

    Well it DOES explain why he spends SO MUCH OF HIS TIME THINKING ABOUT GAY SEX!! ;)

    Comment by republicans hate facts — January 17, 2008 @ 2:42 pm

    Apparently we’re not supposed to talk about his wife. Probably because the rethugs were so charitable to Hillary and Chelsea when Bill was president.


  32. JMOHR Says:

    No, you are denying God’s will. There is an absolute right and an absolute wrong. There is no in between, no compromise and no discussion to the issue. If it is God’s will to clamp down on these deviant sexual practices, then should we not execute all of those who have proclaimed themselves to be for family values while fornicating with wild abandon, seeking child brides, passing hands under the toilet stall, seeking relations with young men and boys, committing adultry, having sex outside of marriage, fathering or having children out of wedlock and other assorted sins. Hey, this gets rid of most of the Republican leadership. Next, let’s go after those who refuse to obey God’s instructions on supporting the poor and providing for the welfare of all of our brethern.


  33. Shayne Says:

    If you go just below the surface of what some of the Christian Pharisees say about us liberals, they consider us all Satan’s (”the beast”) children. So, they probably equate sex with a liberal as bestiality, too.

    Comment by PatrioticLiberalChristian — January 17, 2008 @ 2:43 pm

    Oh great, now they’re going to want to have sex with US, gross.


  34. Wilco Says:

    Shayne, that’s exactly why. The best way to show you’re better than the “rethugs” is to act better than them.
    Talking about the appearance of a candidate’s wife is beyond the pale. It should absolutely be out of bounds.


  35. Shayne Says:

    Shayne, see what you started?

    Comment by Wilco — January 17, 2008 @ 2:43 pm

    And oddly, I’m not really feeling all that guilty. Sorry.


  36. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    Have you seen his wife? I’m just saying …

    Comment by Shayne

    I actually like the fact that his wife looks like a normal, average, middle aged woman. The other Republicans’ wives all look like country club Stepford wives.


  37. republicans hate facts Says:

    Apparently we’re not supposed to talk about his wife. Probably because the rethugs were so charitable to Hillary and Chelsea when Bill was president.
    Comment by Shayne — January 17, 2008 @ 2:44 pm

    ROTFL!!! Yeah, then we have all of the trolls on here that constantly WHINE about Hillary (think misogyny he-man woman hater wimp Hendler) not being attractive… Ah, Republican Hypocrisy is the one thing we can ALWAYS count on! ;)


  38. Shayne Says:

    Comment by And Yet… — January 17, 2008 @ 2:43 pm

    But he used olive oil, it’s not like he had lanolin rubbed all over him. That would be sick.


  39. RUCerious Says:

    No animals were hurt in the incident, according to deputies.

    Comment by And Yet… — January 17, 2008 @ 2:43 pm

    One question, how does a naked guy pack a 357!!?


  40. Veritas Says:

    Huckleberry’s painting himself into a very tight, dark corner here which will further reduce his overall electability. He’s also showing his lack of comprehension of biblical teachings which espouse The Golden Rule above all else: Love thy neighbor as thyself which translates into “total tolerance” of the lifestyles of others. He’s a pretty textbook “christo-hypocrite” - most radical christofascists are!


  41. Wilco Says:

    Shayne, that came out wrong. It seemed like I was agreeing that the reps were indeed nice about Hillary and Chelsea. I was agreeing with your statement soaked in sarcasm.


  42. Shayne Says:

    Next, let’s go after those who refuse to obey God’s instructions on supporting the poor and providing for the welfare of all of our brethern.

    Comment by JMOHR — January 17, 2008 @ 2:45 pm

    Amen brother.


  43. RUCerious Says:

    HUCKABEE/DARYLL/DOG OR CAT 08!


  44. View from the Shire Says:

    Hey, the 8 dems and the teachers union in NV that sued to “stop” the process to make it easier for their competitors in the same party lost. EVERYONE can caucus a little easier now.

    Just like a Dem to sue another Dem to try and get an advantage.
    LOL


  45. Veritas Says:

    We knew Huckabuck’s cristo-hypocrisy was the “real deal” when he lied about the bookcase/cross behind him. This guy’s stooping to the level of “parlor tricks” to gain some steam. Only a fool woudn’t realize that he’s a sick, twisted, radical, bigoted fraud.


  46. Miles Tougeaux Says:

    Well actually we allow people under 18 (child by definition) to marry.

    And yes, when/if animals are considered consenting adults, granted citizenship, pay taxes and are guaranteed rights under the US constitution, I suppose they should be allowed to marry as well.


  47. Shayne Says:

    Shayne, that’s exactly why. The best way to show you’re better than the “rethugs” is to act better than them.
    Talking about the appearance of a candidate’s wife is beyond the pale. It should absolutely be out of bounds.

    Comment by Wilco — January 17, 2008 @ 2:46 pm

    You can’t win bringing a knife to a gun fight. And if he can’t stand the heat, well now would be the time for him to get out of the kitchen.
    Besides the party regulars don’t want Huckabee, I’m sure Rove and his buddies are going to come up with much worse than this.


  48. And Yet... Says:

    ROFLMAO, Shayne @ 38.
    It’s CA, hey, so more organic-friendly, too.

    The guy turns out to be a Repuke, I win several bets.


  49. Dr. Matt Says:

    Reich-wingers do seem to know a lot about sexual deviances.


  50. republicans hate facts Says:

    Just like a Dem to sue another Dem to try and get an advantage.
    LOL Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 2:51 pm

    WTF? Wow, you TARDS sure are BRAIN DAMAGED! Maybe that explains why you SUPPORT MORONS like HUCK, while WHINING NONSENSE LIKE THIS! Tell us, are you another MAN ON BEASTIE like HUCK, or do you just IDENTIFY WITH A FAT UGLY SPOUSE as a FITTING PARTNER to YOUR HIDEOUS SELF LOATHING FATNESS?


  51. Wilco Says:

    Comment by View from the Shire

    Did you hear Hillary’s defense of the suit, filed by her supporters?
    She said they didn’t want people to caucus in the workplace unless everyone could caucus in their workplace, all across the state.


  52. AngryOne Says:

    It’s hardly the first time Huckabee has voiced this position. In his 1998 book, Kids Who Kill: Confronting Our Culture of Violence, Huckabee declared:

    “Despite all our prosperity, pomp, and power, the vaunted American experiment in liberty seems to be disintegrating before our very eyes.”

    “Abortion, environmentalism, AIDS, pornography, drug abuse, and homosexual activism have fragmented and polarized our communities.”

    “It is now difficult to keep track of the vast array of publicly endorsed and institutionally supported aberrations - from homosexuality and pedophilia to sadomasochism and necrophilia.”

    For more on Mike Huckabee’s incendiary blend of zealotry and politics, see:
    “10 More Moments in Mike Huckabee’s Extremism.”


  53. Shayne Says:

    I actually like the fact that his wife looks like a normal, average, middle aged woman. The other Republicans’ wives all look like country club Stepford wives.

    Comment by Frosty Cupcake — January 17, 2008 @ 2:46 pm

    I look like an average middle age woman myself. And MY husband would be running for president over my dead body. You pay your money, you take your chances.


  54. republicans hate facts Says:

    Reich-wingers do seem to know a lot about sexual deviances.
    Comment by Dr. Matt — January 17, 2008 @ 2:52 pm

    Well they always say there’s no excuse for EXPERIENCE, and Huck seems to have a lot of BESTIALITY EXPERIENCE! ;)


  55. Veritas Says:

    Bible-thumpin’ Huckster knows all about the aberrant forms of sexual deviancy, that’s what this story tells us all. Of course, we all know that beastiality and incest are plastered throughout the Old Testament so I guess this former preacher is pretty well “versed” in it all. Huckster’s got a case of “you spot it/you got it (or are doing it)”.


  56. Shayne Says:

    One question, how does a naked guy pack a 357!!?

    Comment by RUCerious — January 17, 2008 @ 2:49 pm

    V E R Y carefully.


  57. LividLib Says:

    i equate huckabee with whitetrashiality


  58. Veritas Says:

    #54. That’s right. From the spate of Repuke hypocrites getting their day in the sunshine, it would appear that their hypocritical repression of their deviant ways is catching up with all of them. Huckster’s just another Repuke case of “he who doth protest too much” - along the lines of Fatass Hastert, Big Boner Boehner and the rest of the pedophile perverts the Repukes have representing them.


  59. RUCerious Says:

    Shayne, it must have been like:

    One false move and the ewe gets it!


  60. View from the Shire Says:

    Hey, Rep hate facts,
    Sound like you have enough hate for everyone inside you. It takes an uneducated and feeble intelligence to have such an excellent comeback as the filth that spews forth from your mind. LOL. Your are a true example of the folks that live under the bridge here at TP. And u call us trols. TRULY FUNNY!!! LOL!!!


  61. Veritas Says:

    It’s becoming clear that Huckabee has no intellectual substance as well. What we definitely DO NOT need is another buffoon in the white house! And Huckabee appears to not even have room temperature IQ.


  62. And Yet... Says:

    RUCerious @ 39- from a friend who lives in Lompoc, per the local Lompoc Record, he actually had the gun in his car.

    It’s so beautiful up that way. Now this perv’s soiled it for me…


  63. Veritas Says:

    Hey RU - RU ever bad today! Pshaw! Love it! We need some levity at this hour of the day.


  64. Veritas Says:

    Or is it: R Ewe ever bad!


  65. dim wit Says:

    I actually like the fact that his wife looks like a normal, average, middle aged woman. The other Republicans’ wives all look like country club Stepford wives.

    Comment by Frosty Cupcake — January 17, 2008 @ 2:46 pm

    I just looked at her online. She is no uglier than Huckabee himself. However, could make a good case for supporting eugenics.


  66. Veritas Says:

    And we have the nerve to condem radical islamo-fascists for preaching the same types of bigotry which Huckaberry spews every day of the week?? Nice double standard in this country, I’d say.


  67. Shayne Says:

    Abortion, environmentalism, AIDS, pornography, drug abuse, and homosexual activism have fragmented and polarized our communities.”
    Comment by AngryOne — January 17, 2008 @ 2:53 pm

    Environmentalism? Oh the horror.


  68. Shayne Says:

    Huckster’s got a case of “you spot it/you got it (or are doing it)”.

    Comment by Veritas — January 17, 2008 @ 2:54 pm

    In all fairness though, what else is there to do in the cultural mecca of Arkansas?


  69. RUCerious Says:

    Vertitas ~ that was baaaaad//.


  70. republicans hate facts Says:

    Abortion, environmentalism, AIDS, pornography, drug abuse, and homosexual activism have fragmented and polarized our communities.”
    Comment by AngryOne — January 17, 2008 @ 2:53 pm

    Don’t you mean IRRATIONAL REPUBLICAN MORALIZING and HYSTERIA and MANIPULATION OF TARDS like YOU on these ISSUES has FRAGMENTED our communities? How about you MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS and STFU you SELF RIGHTEOUS LITTLE PR!CK and then THE POLARIZING will GO AWAY! What about THAT - CHILD?


  71. republicans hate facts Says:

    Sound like you have enough hate for everyone inside you. It takes an uneducated and feeble intelligence to have such an excellent comeback as the filth that spews forth from your mind. LOL. Your are a true example of the folks that live under the bridge here at TP. And u call us trols. TRULY FUNNY!!! LOL!!!
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 2:57 pm

    ROTFL!!! Funny how the WINGNUTS always PROJECT THEIR HATE on OTHERS!! ;)


  72. shoeless Says:

    Huck seems to have a lot of BESTIALITY EXPERIENCE! ;)

    Comment by republicans hate facts

    He grew up on a farm, and he obviously kept a box handy in the barn.


  73. Winski Says:

    When do he and Ricky crawl back in 16th century hole they crawled out of??

    Move along..nothing to see here..just another wingnut flapping around in a mud hole…


  74. Shayne Says:

    One false move and the ewe gets it!

    Comment by RUCerious — January 17, 2008 @ 2:56 pm

    Probably but I’m sure he was oogling the rams not the ewes. The ewes would be almost wholesome for a rethug.


  75. republicans hate facts Says:

    Oh and ShireSh!t - TROLLS (that would be YOU) are the ones LIVING UNDER THE BRIDGE HERE!!! But I wouldn’t expect an anti-intellectual inbred MORON to UNDERSTAND BASIC ENGLISH well enough to REALIZE you CRITICIZED YOURSELF!! ROTFL!!!


  76. View from the Shire Says:

    Huck was actually compared and equated with radical islamo-fascists. WOW! Maybe next, he’ll charter a plane and fly it into Dem National Headquarters. “NOW THAT WOULD SOLIDIFY THE EQUASION!”


  77. LividLib Says:

    I just looked at her online. She is no uglier than Huckabee himself. However, could make a good case for supporting eugenics.

    Comment by dim wit — January 17, 2008 @ 2:59 pm

    she wouldn’t look out of place starting at right tackle on the razorback’s offense line.


  78. Shayne Says:

    TRULY FUNNY!!! LOL!!!

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 2:57 pm

    Glad we could amuse you.


  79. View from the Shire Says:

    Wingnut here, to all MOONBATS, talk to ya later!


  80. republicans hate facts Says:

    Huck was actually compared and equated with radical islamo-fascists. WOW! Maybe next, he’ll charter a plane and fly it into Dem National Headquarters. “NOW THAT WOULD SOLIDIFY THE EQUASION!” Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:05 pm

    You mean like BLOWING UP and FBI BUILDING full of CHILDREN with a BUNCH OF FERTILIZER? Or MURDERING DOCTORS with HUNTING RIFLES? Sorry TARD but you XTIAN EXTREMISTS have ALREADY EARNED the COMPARISON!! ROTFL!!


  81. Shayne Says:

    And Huckabee appears to not even have room temperature IQ.

    Comment by Veritas — January 17, 2008 @ 2:58 pm

    And he didn’t have the benefit of legacy parents who could get him the best education money can buy.


  82. republicans hate facts Says:

    Wingnut here, to all MOONBATS, talk to ya later!
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:06 pm

    ROTFL!!! Moonbats? How TARDED!!! You wouldn’t KNOW a MOONBAT any more than you could tell the difference between a COW, YOUR SISTER OR your LAST SEXUAL PARTNER!! ROTFL!!!


  83. View from the Shire Says:

    What a mental ward this place is. I weep for your children.


  84. shoeless Says:

    Maybe next, he’ll charter a plane and fly it into Dem National Headquarters. “NOW THAT WOULD SOLIDIFY THE EQUASION!”

    Comment by View from the Shire

    Ann Coulter, is that you?


  85. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    dim:

    Yeah, they look like they “go together”. As for the eugenics thing? I don’t care so much about looks as I do anti-modernism, anti-progress, anti-enlightenment. *Those* things I’d like to see eradicated from Americans.

    Shayne at 67:

    You beat me to it. Yeah, environmentalism ranks right up there with drug abuse alright.

    (Why no rolleyes emoticon here?! I could sooo use it.)


  86. republicans hate facts Says:

    He grew up on a farm, and he obviously kept a box handy in the barn. Comment by shoeless — January 17, 2008 @ 3:04 pm

    Well you GO with what you’re FAMILIAR WITH! It explains his attraction to BARNYARD LOOKING MATES! ;)


  87. republicans hate facts Says:

    What a mental ward this place is. I weep for your children.
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:08 pm

    Well TO BE FAIR to a NUTJOB LIKE YOU, EVERYONE must seem INSANE! Then again, PROJECTION is what INSANE LUNATICS like YOU - DO BEST!! ROTFL!!


  88. dim wit Says:

    What a mental ward this place is. I weep for your children.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:08 pm

    How ironic. I weep for yours!


  89. Menehune Says:

    Dear Jesus,
    Please grant our leaders the wisdom to STFU! Amen.


  90. View from the Shire Says:

    You wouldn’t KNOW a MOONBAT any more than you could tell the difference between a COW, YOUR SISTER OR your LAST SEXUAL PARTNER!! ROTFL!!!

    Comment by republicans hate facts — January 17, 2008 @ 3:08 pm

    Last sexual partner was your MOM, just after your WIFE.
    Now that I’ve sunk to your pathetic level, I’ll lock your cell for you.


  91. republicans hate facts Says:

    What a mental ward this place is. I weep for your children.
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:08 pm

    And TECHNICALLY SPEAKING, as long as NUTJOBS LIKE YOU are here - your POST is SOMEWHAT ACCURATE! What WE WEEP FOR - is CHILDREN-LIKE-YOU that are TOO STUNTED to know you AREN’T AN ADULT!! ROTLF!!


  92. robbez_92107 Says:

    What a mental ward this place is. I weep for your children.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:08 pm

    Sen. Boner, is that you?


  93. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    Please just ignore the trolls. Well, at least ignore the non interesting ones.


  94. View from the Shire Says:

    republicans hate facts

    We should caucus face to face? You up for it?


  95. republicans hate facts Says:

    Last sexual partner was your MOM, just after your WIFE.
    Now that I’ve sunk to your pathetic level, I’ll lock your cell for you.
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:10 pm

    ROTFL!! Sorry, but you’d have STAND ON A STOOL to LICK MY FEET - DUM BASS!!! As for LOCKING CELLS, more DELUSIONS from the LUNATIC ASYLUM!!! You CRACK ME UP - CRAZY CHILD! ROTFL!!


  96. cwillis Says:

    Mike “man and animal” Huckabee, meet Rick “man on dog” Santorum.

    What is it with certain Republicans and bestiality? Why is it that when someone brings up a civil-rights issue impacting a sizable plurality of Americans (that just happens to revolve around sexual orientation), their minds turn to the practice of zoophilic sex? This kind of non-sequitur is psych ward material, to say the least.


  97. republicans hate facts Says:

    republicans hate facts
    We should caucus face to face? You up for it?
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:12 pm

    Ah, PANSIE COWARDS like YOU - ARE ALL TALK!! ROTFL!! Come ON, MAKE ME LAUGH SOME MORE - COWARD!! ROTFL!!


  98. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    cwillis:

    It’s an instant attention grabber. And it must work with their base or it wouldn’t be their “go to” line.


  99. RUCerious Says:

    Daryll? Why aren’t you piping up and defending your
    PresiMinisterAllechht?


  100. View from the Shire Says:

    I choose to back up my loose talk, how bout you? Bet you would rather choose to hide behind the pads in your cell and remain a ghost, never to show what you really are.


  101. republicans hate facts Says:

    Funny how a LUNATIC - DEFENDS a LUNATIC that thinks HOMOSEXUALITY IS LIKE BESTIALITY - and PROJECTS his SAD, PATHETIC, SELF LOATHING LUNACY - ON OTHERS!! That’s the TRUE MARK of a SELF LOATHING FOOL!! ROTFL!! Poor SHIRE! How OFTEN have you WISHED you could participate in some of that ‘bestiality’? ROTFL!! Tap those FEET - LITTLE ONE!! ROTFL!!!


  102. LividLib Says:

    What a mental ward this place is. I weep for your children.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:08 pm

    and how’s your litter?
    more genetically diverse than the last one, i hope.


  103. republicans hate facts Says:

    I choose to back up my loose talk, how bout you? Bet you would rather choose to hide behind the pads in your cell and remain a ghost, never to show what you really are.
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:15 pm

    ROTFL!!! If you actually had any B@LLS, you wouldn’t be HIDING behind a FAKE ID, while MAKING THREATS! As it IS, you’re a PURE COWARD LIAR and HYPOCRITE!! ROTFL!!


  104. Shayne Says:

    Huck was actually compared and equated with radical islamo-fascists. WOW! Maybe next, he’ll charter a plane and fly it into Dem National Headquarters. “NOW THAT WOULD SOLIDIFY THE EQUASION!”

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:05 pm

    FUNDAMENTALISTS = FUNDAMENTALISTS

    It’s our fundie president that started a war based on lies that caused these deaths:

    “The authors of a peer-reviewed study, conducted by a survey team from Johns Hopkins University, claim that about 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died as a result of the war.

    Oh but he’s holier than thou because HE’s only killed brown people, right?


  105. View from the Shire Says:

    Instead, you’ll prob just have Judd block my IP and move on with your pathetic, hate filled, never really amount to anything life.


  106. shoeless Says:

    republicans hate facts

    We should caucus face to face? You up for it?

    Comment by View from the Shire

    Don’t do it. He has already called for an act of terroism against Americans. He might show up with a bunch of dynamite strapped to his waist.


  107. republicans hate facts Says:

    Instead, you’ll prob just have Judd block my IP and move on with your pathetic, hate filled, never really amount to anything life.
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:17 pm

    Post your CONTACT INFO, I’m SURE someone will be HAPPY to HELP EDUCATE YOU on what a COWARD YOU ARE! And TAKE YOU UP on your BLUFF!!! POOR LITTLE COWARD!! ROTFL!!


  108. Shayne Says:

    What a mental ward this place is. I weep for your children.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:08 pm

    That’s OK, our children weep over people like you.


  109. Wilco Says:

    View, what name did you used to go by?


  110. republicans hate facts Says:

    Typical Republican Coward! ZZZzzzzzzzzz…..


  111. View from the Shire Says:

    I’m a trucker and travel coast to coast. My truck is my home unless I stay in a motel. I truly do see both coasts in a months time, so direct me to your ward, and I bring a nurse to the caucus.


  112. Shayne Says:

    Instead, you’ll prob just have Judd block my IP and move on with your pathetic, hate filled, never really amount to anything life.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:17 pm

    Y A W N


  113. LividLib Says:

    I truly do see both coasts in a months time, so direct me to your ward, and I bring a nurse to the caucus.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

    you can just keep the blow-up nurse in the truck!


  114. Shayne Says:

    He might show up with a bunch of dynamite strapped to his waist.

    Comment by shoeless — January 17, 2008 @ 3:17 pm

    Hell no, he’s expect some poor kid to do that for him too. Just like he expects them to fight the war he loves. Right, View? You don’t want to get your hands dirty do you?


  115. ebbAndflow Says:

    Hmmm, plan on meeting View in a Texas boxing ring ~ “it” will never show but attempt to make us believe it was you who didn’t show!


  116. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    How is it that new trolls know more about the admins and banning around this place than I do? What ever could that mean?


  117. missmolly Says:

    I realize I’m late to this party, so if somebody else posted this, I apologize.

    Huckabee really needs to find some fresh new arguments to bolster his somewhat bizarre beliefs, because these retreads are getting tiresome.

    We have heard the argument that if you permit two people of the same sex to marry, soon people will be permitted to marry animals. This argument was used time and time again in this country to justify the prohibition of interracial marriage — up until 1967 when the Supreme Court finally declared any ban on interracial marriage to be unconstitutional. That was over 40 years ago, interracial marriages don’t even attract any attention anymore, and marriages between people and animals are still unrecognized.

    Just add this to the growing pile of Huckabee lunacy.


  118. Shayne Says:

    I’m a trucker and travel coast to coast. My truck is my home unless I stay in a motel. I truly do see both coasts in a months time, so direct me to your ward, and I bring a nurse to the caucus.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

    This one’s not even trailer trash, he’s semi trash. Impressive.


  119. View from the Shire Says:

    View, what name did you used to go by?

    Comment by Wilco — January 17, 2008 @ 3:20 pm

    Haven’t gone by any. The Judd reference made you ask? I investigate and dig a little before I act, or react. Use to be in IT, got fired and can’t hold position in field for certain unmentionable hack reasons. Now a trucker. Not as lucrative, but I get to see this country and meet folks like “Rep” from time to time.


  120. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    Thanks you,missmolly, for an on-topic post.

    And yes, I agree wholeheartedly about the interracial marriage history. No doubt the anti-modernists like Huckabee would have been against interracial marriage, too.


  121. Shayne Says:

    Hmmm, plan on meeting View in a Texas boxing ring ~ “it” will never show but attempt to make us believe it was you who didn’t show!

    Comment by ebbAndflow — January 17, 2008 @ 3:25 pm

    Wayne is still waiting for Dr. Dog or whatever his name was to show up for his ass whooping.


  122. View from the Shire Says:

    Shayne, without folks like me to bring you everything that moves in this country, you would have nothing.


  123. Shayne Says:

    Shayne, without folks like me to bring you everything that moves in this country, you would have nothing.

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:28 pm

    My husband’s whole family are truckers but oddly they managed to buy nice homes to live in. Do you people EVER get the point?


  124. shoeless Says:

    Shayne, without folks like me to bring you everything that moves in this country, you would have nothing.

    Comment by View from the Shire

    So, you haul things that move? You mean like animals?


  125. shoeless Says:

    View, what name did you used to go by?

    Comment by Wilco

    Ann Coulter


  126. LividLib Says:

    Shayne, without folks like me to bring you everything that moves in this country, you would have nothing.

    Comment by View from the Shire

    and we thank ya, View.
    mighty obliged, we are!
    don’t know what us MOONBATS would do without the likes of View and his trusty blow-up nurse doll.
    keep on truck’n!


  127. Tomas Says:

    My husband’s whole family are truckers but oddly they managed to buy nice homes to live in. Do you people EVER get the point?

    Comment by Shayne — January 17, 2008 @ 3:30 pm

    Jumbo mortgage they can’t afford, huh? That’s what I hate about Americans — consume, consume, consume.


  128. Buckie Boy Says:

    How can anyone this ignorant get anywhere near public office? It is just amazing that the ChristoFascist people, also ignorant and bigoted, would vote for these types of idiots.

    My dog loves me, but just for food and fetching toys.
    How much does your dog love you Phuckleberry? And why are you even thinking of such crap? You repukes are a very sick bunch for sure.

    Buck Fush


  129. dim wit Says:

    Just add this to the growing pile of Huckabee lunacy.

    Comment by missmolly — January 17, 2008 @ 3:25 pm

    Sorry, missmolly, thread has degenerated quickly.

    Its the old slippery-slope arguement - just a little more insulting. Why is it that somehow gay people get lumped into beastialitists? Comparing two men marrying to a man marrying an animal is akin to a vegetarian saying he doesn’t eat meat because he is not a cannibal.

    I do believe humans have the ability to distinguish between these “miniscule” little differences.


  130. View from the Shire Says:

    Don’t worry Tomas, Shayne’s family will most assuridly tax the system with another foreclosure. I know a drop house in Tucson, AZ that they can stay at. May be a little crowded, but hey, they prob advocate letting the Illegals stay, so why not BUNK UP!


  131. RUCerious Says:

    The Archbishop of Urine now drives a truck. How quaint. Quite the step down for you, isn’t it?


  132. republicans hate facts Says:

    I’m a trucker and travel coast to coast. My truck is my home unless I stay in a motel. I truly do see both coasts in a months time, so direct me to your ward, and I bring a nurse to the caucus.
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

    A HOMELESS MORON who REFUSES to DIVULGE HIS ID or LOCATION while POSTURING on a THREAD about HOMOSEXUALITY… CLOSET CASE!!! You’re SO BORING, TARD!


  133. bitblt Says:


    …
    Huckabee really needs to find some fresh new arguments to bolster his somewhat bizarre beliefs, because these retreads are getting tiresome.

    We have heard the argument that if you permit two people of the same sex to marry, soon people will be permitted to marry animals.
    …
    Comment by missmolly — January 17, 2008 @ 3:25 pm

    Preacher Huckabee knows that Leviticus 18 lists three reprehensible practices: child sacrifice, men on men sex, and bestiality. There is a suggestion that there is a hierarchy of depravity. If you say that abortion is child sacrifice and that homosexual relationship are tolerated, then why be surprised at the third one.

    Dr Dobson makes a point of showing how this can happen with polygamy. Note the authority for the appeal.

    http://www.citizenlink.org/ FOSI/ homosexuality/ A000004753.cfm

    …
    In Utah polygamist Tom Green, who claims five wives, is citing Lawrence v. Texas as the legal authority for his appeal. In January 2004, a Salt Lake City civil rights attorney filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of another couple wanting to engage in legal polygamy. Their justification? Lawrence v. Texas. The ACLU of Utah has actually suggested that the state will “have to step up to prove that a polygamous relationship is detrimental to society” — as opposed to the polygamists having to prove that plural marriage is not harmful to the culture.
    …

    If God says a marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman – this is what Christ confirms in Matthew 19 - then marriage is protected.

    If you say a marriage is whatever the government permits the governed to say it is, then marriage will become nothing – sex between people and animals.

    Simply substitue the word of your choice in the phrase, “…have to step up to prove that a _________ relationship is detrimental to society.”

    Progress toward becoming a nation that is not worth preserving.


  134. republicans hate facts Says:

    Shayne, without folks like me to bring you everything that moves in this country, you would have nothing.
    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:28 pm

    ROTFL!!! Sure we would, we just wouldn’t be OVERCHARGED SO MUCH FOR IT!!! ROTFL!!


  135. Tomas Says:

    Comment by View from the Shire — January 17, 2008 @ 3:37 pm

    Shayne is the Omarosa of Thinkprogress.org. The mutant is detrimental to the mission of progressivism. This poser believes that progressivism is an elite club with upscale homes and unrivaled cockiness.

    As a latino, however, I will have to disagree with your views on immigration. I am for open immigration to displace the likes of Shayne.


  136. Tomas Says:

    Comment by republicans hate facts — January 17, 2008 @ 3:42 pm

    Gringo, shut the f.u.c.k up.


  137. republicans hate facts Says:

    You know ShireSh!t, there’s supposed to be a lot of TOE-TAPPING between TRUCKERS - is THAT why you were drawn to THIS thread? ROTFL!!


  138. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    Threads never stop going to $hit when trolls are engaged in “debate”.


  139. republicans hate facts Says:

    Gringo, shut the f.u.c.k up.
    Comment by Tomas — January 17, 2008 @ 3:45 pm

    TARDO, TAKE YOUR OWN ADVICE ;)


  140. missmolly Says:

    Comment by dim wit — January 17, 2008 @ 3:37 pm

    Huckabee is pandering to people who are afraid of change. His strategy is two-fold — 1) make them even MORE afraid (”marriage will be destroyed”), and then 2) position himself as the savior who will prevent this calamity from happening.

    Right now, he’s preaching to a very loyal choir. He’s going to have to woo more than the evangelicals to get the GOP nomination. And even if he somehow manages that feat, he’ll have a hard time playing his greatest hits to a national audience of all parties without being tossed aside as a complete fool.


  141. republicans hate facts Says:

    As a latino, however, I will have to disagree with your views on immigration. I am for open immigration to displace the likes of Shayne.
    Comment by Tomas — January 17, 2008 @ 3:44 pm

    ROTFL!!! And WHO has the ELITISM, ARROGANCE again? You TARDS are SO PREDICTABLE!! YOUR PROJECTION just shows what a COMPLETE MORON you are though!! ROTFL!!


  142. dim wit Says:

    Progress toward becoming a nation that is not worth preserving.

    Comment by bitblt — January 17, 2008 @ 3:42 pm

    as the name may suggest, I’m a little slow. But what the fu(k are you talking about?


  143. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    missmolly:

    His populist economic stance virtually guarantee that corporate money will be arrayed against him should he even get close to the nomination.


  144. Wilco Says:

    But where is in American legislation is it stated that marriage is a solely Christian rite?


  145. republicans hate facts Says:

    Threads never stop going to $hit when trolls are engaged in “debate”.
    Comment by Frosty Cupcake — January 17, 2008 @ 3:45 pm

    To be FAIR there’s NOTHING TO DEBATE in this thread. Huck is a FOOL, and the MORON TROLLS that RESPOND to this thread are OBVIOUS SICKOS with some ‘ISSUES’ that are UNRESOLVED (we call that THE CLOSET among CIVILIZED - NON-TRUCKDRIVER TYPES) ;)


  146. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    Curse no editing capability!

    Should be “virtually guarantees”…


  147. zuch Says:

    #38 Shayne:

    But he used olive oil, it’s not like he had lanolin rubbed all over him. That would be sick.

    Indeed. Ashcroft would have approved. That’s the proper procedure for “anointment”. But Crisco is even more ‘Merkun.

    Cheers,


  148. Wilco Says:

    Why should marriage be completely dependant upon the Christian definition?


  149. RUCerious Says:

    Jefferson ~
    …(O)ur rulers can have no authority over such natural rights, only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. In neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg (Notes on Virginia, 1785.


  150. Tomas Says:

    Comment by republicans hate facts — January 17, 2008 @ 3:47 pm

    Gringo, move back to Europe.


  151. zuch Says:

    “No animals were hurt in the incident, according to deputies.”

    Nothing baaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhd happened.

    Cheers,


  152. imorgan82 Says:

    Just because the Bible had to lay it out that people shouldn’t marry animals (remember, back then we were about 3 hairs short of being babboons) doesn’t mean we liberals are currently stupid enough to find ourselves in the situation where we’ve got to pay alimony to the rabbit I have nightly sex with. We keep that shit on the side where it belongs.


  153. Wilco Says:

    Tomas, when are the latinos sgoing to take over the country?


  154. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    RHF:

    True…hence the quotation marks around the word debate.

    It’s really too bad that he comes from a fundamentalist background. (Yes? He is a fundamentalist?) It would be nice if another, saner, Republican candidate addressed economic disparity in this country.

    It’s real problem, one not addressed in the corporate news, and only Edwards and Huckabee are talking about it on the national, political level.


  155. zuch Says:

    Who say Huckabee on the Colbert Report? Now that was hilarious. Can’t say Huch doesn’t have a sense of humour … either that or the jokes went completely over his head. ;-)

    Cheers,


  156. zuch Says:

    “say” shouldda been “saw”


  157. zuch Says:

    #94 View from the Shire:

    [to “republicans hate facts”] We should caucus face to face? You up for it?

    Tsk-tsk…. Huckabee wouldn’t approve. Only doggie-style is permitted by the Good Book.

    Cheers,


  158. Tomas Says:

    Tomas, when are the latinos sgoing to take over the country?

    Comment by Wilco — January 17, 2008 @ 3:52 pm

    As soon as we conquer the likes of you. You believe Gibson is the only one?


  159. Wilco Says:

    Since non-Christians will go to hell just as surely as homosexuals, should they too not be kept from marrying? Isn’t their sin just as not up to God’s Standards as homosexuality?


  160. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    zuch:

    I always find Huckabee very charming and funny on the Colbert Report. I won’t vote for him, mind you, but he’s funny.

    And I liked those weird Huckabee/Chuck Norris fist commercials, too.


  161. Wilco Says:

    Tomas, you’re Joker, no?


  162. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    For some reason the fake Hispanic “Tomas” is cracking me up.

    Not sure why.


  163. republicans hate facts Says:

    As soon as we conquer the likes of you. You believe Gibson is the only one?
    Comment by Tomas — January 17, 2008 @ 4:00 pm

    ROTFL!!! It’s HYSTERICAL seeing FOOLS like YOU whine about ELITISM while DEFENDING THE GOP RACIST ELITISM!!! Especially on a THREAD about prejudice against GAY PEOPLE!!! HYSTERICAL!!! Wow you’re a DUMB ONE!


  164. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    Wilco:

    Joker was before my time here, though I hear the name from time to time. Was this his schtick?


  165. Tomas Says:

    Comment by republicans hate facts — January 17, 2008 @ 4:03 pm

    GOP racism? I’m here in the fight against racism on latino immigrants. That’s why I demand this party get on the road with the votes the latino community gave them in 2006 and approve an amnesty package.

    You better watch it white boy. You’ll be shipped back to Europe with your combative antics.


  166. Wilco Says:

    Frosty, depending on who he posts as, yes.
    Once he posted as a dead soldier and attacked the soldier’s friend on here.
    This might not be him. His writing style is slightly different but the latino revolution theme is certainly native to Joker.


  167. Tomas Says:

    For some reason the fake Hispanic “Tomas” is cracking me up.

    Not sure why.

    Comment by Frosty Cupcake — January 17, 2008 @ 4:03 pm

    Would that be because you’re a racist?

    We’re trying not to get you to laugh, but to give you a message: Get out of our country. Go back to Europe.


  168. Buckie Boy Says:

    I see the Rightards are in full march and the racist idiot Joker is here again, hey Joker, FUalltohellandback you sick racist phuck.

    Phuckleberry is not gonna win anything when he says pukes out crap like this.

    Buck Fush


  169. Shayne Says:

    Jumbo mortgage they can’t afford, huh? That’s what I hate about Americans — consume, consume, consume.

    Comment by Tomas — January 17, 2008 @ 3:35 pm

    Since we’ve all owned our homes for well over 20 years you obviously don’t know what you’re talking about, Joker. Say bye, bye.


  170. Wilco Says:

    How is America YOUR country?
    I mean, I can understand an argument about some southern lands ceded by Mexico being returned.
    But all of America?
    Yes, that’s laughable.


  171. Tomas Says:

    Comment by Wilco — January 17, 2008 @ 4:08 pm

    It’s a real joker to see you in my country, on my land. Might want to pack up. We’ll cover your travel expenses.


  172. Bobwurst Says:

    We should caucus face to face? You up for it?

    Comment by View from the Shire

    Those are hobbits, not trolls dummy. Why is you rethuglicans always talk tough when you don’t have to back it up?


  173. Frosty Cupcake Says:

    Ahh, thanks, Wilco. :-)


  174. Tomas Says:

    I say this because democrats have failed to push immigration reform. They like seeing people rounded up, so they need to leave along with every repub.


  175. Tomas Says:

    Comment by Wilco — January 17, 2008 @ 4:10 pm

    Interest accumulates over time. You stole the southwest, but tacking on interest gives us the entire country.


  176. alpuz3 Says:

    You better watch it white boy. You’ll be shipped back to Europe with your combative antics.

    Comment by Tomas — January 17, 2008 @ 4:07 pm

    oh man, sorry to repost this. but that there was one strange assed threat.


  177. Wilco Says:

    Frosty, sure thing.
    He’s generally a despicable human being.


  178. RUCerious Says:

    Tomas doesn’t sound like a Native American name.

    What the hell is he talking about ‘our’ country?


  179. bitblt Says:


    Progress toward becoming a nation that is not worth preserving.

    Comment by bitblt — January 17, 2008 @ 3:42 pm

    as the name may suggest, I’m a little slow. But what the fu(k are you talking about?

    Comment by dim wit — January 17, 2008 @ 3:47 pm

    U.S. Army drill sergeants wear, or a least they use to, a round badge on their right shirt pocket. The badge has thirteen stars and a slogan: “This we’ll defend.” The idea is that they’ll defend the American way of life.

    Is the American way of life worth defending?

    If the nation is not worth preserving, who’ll defend it? Who’ll think it’s worth continuing?

    Simply put, do you want to fight and die ( and pay taxes) and swear to defend the Constitution of the U.S. so that two guys in Massachusetts can commit perversion and called it a marriage? Do you want to fight and die( and pay taxes ) and swear to defend the Constitution of the U.S. so that a woman can express her freedom by destroying her unborn?

    People are united for a reason. When the reasons for unity go away, why should the people stay united?

    So called “homosexual rights” will be a nation breaker in this country.


  180. Wilco Says:

    Tomas, you need to check your history. The land wasn’t stolen. It was ceded by the Mexican government.
    Now, if you were pretending to be navite american instead of hispanic, then you’d have a much better argument about stolen lands.


  181. missmolly Says:

    Comment by bitblt — January 17, 2008 @ 3:42 pm

    1) Anyone using Leviticus to bolster an argument really needs to use ALL of it — not just the portions that support that person’s petty bigotries. If you are going to live by Leviticus 18, then you must also live by Leviticus 19, etc. When you are ready to also condemn wearing garments of more than one thread, growing more than one crop in a field, eating shellfish, eating pork, avoiding contact with menstruating women, stoning blasphemers to death, etc., I will take your Leviticus argument seriously. Until then, you are just cherry-picking.

    2) Abortion and “child sacrifice” are two completely different things. I know of no one who supports the right of women to make their own decisions during their first trimester who also supports the right to kill children already born. And your argument that someone who would tolerate homosexual relationships would also tolerate bestiality and killing children is baseless. Just because all are mentioned in the same chapter of Leviticus doesn’t make them some sort of “package deal”.

    3) Your argument regarding the ACLU and polygamy is mildly interesting, but has nothing to do with gay marriage. Not only that, but just because the ACLU is making a challenge doesn’t mean they are going to win. In fact, I’d say they have an uphill battle on this one. However, if the ACLU is making this argument now, in a state where gay marriage is illegal, how would legalizing gay marriage change anything? Gay marriage has nothing to do with polygamy, just as gay marriage has nothing to do with bestiality. Despite what Dobson says.

    4) Civil marriage (marriage recognized by the government) and religious marriage (marriage recognized by the church) are two different things. Our government has made it a practice to recognize church marriages as legal, but churches have never been under any obligation to recognize civil marriages (and in the case of the Catholic church not recognizing the marriages of divorced people, this happens a fair amount of the time). Churches would not be under any obligation to recognize marriages between gays just because the government does. Creating a legal definition of “marriage” based upon Christian scripture violates the establishment clause of the first amendment, anyway — so your argument of Matthew 19 has no merit. The words of Jesus may “protect” marriage as far as the church is concerned, but not as far as the government is concerned.

    One thing you fail to address in responding to my argument is the main point I had — that we heard all these arguments when the fight was against interracial marriage. Interracial marriage has been legal nationwide for 40 years now. And while the institute of marriage as a whole isn’t as respected as it used to be, that’s certainly not the fault of interracial couples. Allowing committed monogamous gay couples to marry won’t crush society, either.


  182. RUCerious Says:

    do you want to fight and die ( and pay taxes) and swear to defend the Constitution of the U.S. so that two guys in Massachusetts can commit perversion and called it a marriage? Do you want to fight and die( and pay taxes ) and swear to defend the Constitution of the U.S. so that a woman can express her freedom by destroying her unborn?

    I did fight for my country and to preserve the Constitution and laws of the land. If Massachussets wants to pass such a law, the 10th Amendment gives them the right to do so.

    Get over it.


  183. RUCerious Says:

    Daryll’s back from the banned, er damned!

    Dog help us!


  184. Shayne Says:

    Comment by RUCerious — January 17, 2008 @ 3:50 pm

    What did Jefferson know compared to that genius Chuckleberry?


  185. Wilco Says:

    Dog the dyslexic god!

    Or is it the other way around?


  186. robbez_92107 Says:

    That’s what I hate about Americans — consume, consume, consume.

    Comment by Tomas — January 17, 2008 @ 3:35 pm

    It’s okay - you’re loved in return. Hence the push for immigration “reform.” As for “your country,” the Mexican-American war had consequences, my friend.

    Remember the Alamo!


  187. Shayne Says:

    Gringo, move back to Europe.

    Comment by Tomas — January 17, 2008 @ 3:51 pm

    Your people didn’t learn Spanish from native Americans idiot. Go back to Spain.


  188. Frosty Cupcake Says: