Rightarded traitors are at times amusing.

Jonah Goldberg, he doth project too much.

.

Comment by SomeRandomGuy — January 17, 2008 @ 8:51 pm

probably not.

Actually to be kind all winners (losers?) should get the sharp stick in the eye because it’s sure better than reading this load of crap. I’m not the type that automatically dismisses the other side of the argument. I don’t believe all topics are simply black or white. There are cases though such as the ideas of a Jonah Goldberg that are the rare exception. I do dismiss him simply because his ideas are so devoid of rational thought that they make absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Having said all that…poor Doughy Pantload, he’s so misunderstood by us evil liberals. We just don’t understand his genius.

An entry I recall from a right wing site in ‘06: “bought myself a new woodchipper, wish I could throw a few libs in it just to break it in…”

Really? Have you ever gone to redstate.com, little green footballs, free republic, or any other political blog? It’s the same, or worse everywhere else.

I have a bonsai forum that I go to, and If you want calm, polite discussion I highly recommend. But any political forum is going to have angry people arguing. Kinda comes with the territory…

Empyrical demonstration: If you put a million monkeys with typewriters (in this case computer keyboards), one of them will write a book. Although it is undecipherable gibberish.

Whatever this ideology is, the posters on this page are some of the most vitriolic and intolerant I’ve ever come across. But maybe I’m more liberal and open-minded than most.

So, this was not a standard Daily Show interview and was not a standard editing.

Comment by Exley — January 17, 2008 @ 3:10 pm

The reason the Goldberg interview is longer than normal is that The Pastey Doughy Fat and Onoxious Pantload is full of more fully digested bovine excrement most of Stewart’s guests.
In fact, how could any interview with DP be in any way normal?

There is no such thing as “liberal totalitarianism.” That would be a contradiction in terms. There are examples of extreme leftist communist totalitarianism, but these are authoritarian leftists, not liberals. One of the first things Stalin did was round up liberals and send them off to gulags.

Comment by delafield — January 17, 2008 @ 4:50 pm

Only for Hillary if she runs against McPain, Mutt Rommel, or Ghouliani.

Republican Fascism, now there you have something real, Liberal Fascism…WTF…are you freaking nuts?

Buck Fush

a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

Liberal

a: of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism b: of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives

What’s your next useless stupid book going to be about , Jonah Shitstain ?
Neoconservatism and it’s acceptance and encouragement of outside influences and enlightenment ?

If the far right, (Jonah Goldberg, O’Reilly, Hannity, Bush, Cheney, Kristol, Rove, Limbaugh, etc…), hates Hillary Clinton this much then I’ll be voting for Hillary.

I want to be the exact opposite of scumbags like Jonah Goldberg, George Bush, and Dick Cheney.

they don’t really hate hillary. they want her to win if a republican can’t. she’ll keep their status quo like the clintons always do. the hate is just pretend play for the masses…

voting hillary is no different than a vote for bush/cheney as far as foreign policy goes…and most of the domestic as well…