Comments on: Clinton wins Nevada caucuses.

By: Fred

Fred — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:32:20 +0000

Beisdes, about 938 troops were killed during this war.

CreasyB,
Ex-American

Comment by creasybear

I’m afraid your credibility is much more suspect. Ex American is right. I guess you think that the link you attached to prove the lie is credible….

Second line at the top of the link…I swear to god:

“Observations of the World from the heart of Jesusland.”

guess we can disregard just about anything you say from now on…

I think you will find that no American soldiers were killed the Balkans

By: creasybear

creasybear — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:34:11 +0000

Dalefield is a bigger moron than the person hes trying to defend!
Bill ordered an unauthorized and illegal war in the Balkan and had a Blitz Fest in Iraq after the Lenwisky mess, all an act of persuading the almighty AIPAC and media who were crawling around his balls sniffing for evidence whether Blow-job-gate was more than just a lip-service from Monique. Beisdes, about 938 troops were killed during this war.
You think Hillary wont take you to another war if these same people try to blackmail her the same they blackmailed Mr. Corrupt her hubby?
Go ahead and vote for her. Another 4 years of big screw-ups would teach you all.

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/us-lost-more-soldiers-annually-under.html
http://mpinkeyes.wordpress.com/2007/02/20/military-casualties-during-the-bill-clinton-administration/

CreasyB,
Ex-American

By: delafield

delafield — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:56:37 +0000

Tell me more about her achivements

Comment by creasybear â€” January 21, 2008 @ 11:32 am

The Clintons were actually paying down the Federal deficits created by Reagan and Bush. We had record high employment during the Clinton years. We had so many jobs available during the Clinton years that we had to bring people in from other countries to fill them. When the Clintons left office, America had a $5 trillion projected budget surplus. Not one American soldier died in battle under the Clintons (Bush Sr. sent our troops to Somalia, not the Clintons). The DJIA went from 2,000 to 12,000. The Clintons tried to bring Universal Health Care to America (for some stupid reason, Americans wanted to stay with a corporate health care system where they pay twice as much for 1/2 the health care). Wages for the poor and middle class were going up because there was a huge demand for labor.

The Clintons raised taxes on the wealthiest Americans. Now that Bush is in office, the wealthiest Americans pay nothing. The wealthy Americans and corporations have stolen everything from the U.S. Treasury with Bush’s help. The U.S. Treasury is now $10 trillion in debt.

Vote for Ralph Nader again. That’s what Bush and Karl Rove want you to do.

By: Fred

Fred — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:14:37 +0000

367, 368
You make a lot of disparaging and depressing remarks but I don’t hear any solutions……suggestions….what do you think will change what you see to be a done deal..

you may see them as one and the same but I do see some serious differences and I have hope to be able to change things in the future…if the republicans maintain control that will be out of reach for us….

I never had to worry about unitary presidential powers under clintonâ€¦I never had to worry about unilateral premtive war with clintonâ€¦..all Iâ€™m saying isâ€¦..there are some serious differences.

By: shades59901

shades59901 — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:09:03 +0000

christ people when r u all going to wake up and smell the roses….this congress is the MOST CORRUPT…these people running for office r all bought and paid for by International Corps…..Hillary will win the bid for Pres. because the Fed. Reserve and the people that control it have already put her in just like that A– hole Bush…Cheney should be Impeached…Hell I could go on-and on….but the sad thing is , those people pushing for Gun Control will have their way when U wake up one morning and there will be a shortage of Bullets…think about it……..Christ wake up before it’s too damn late

By: creasybear

creasybear — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:32:03 +0000

Hi Lefty Patriot. I think you asked a very dumb question. My answers wont be dumb, so I guess you wont understand anyway.

Hilliary remains the biggest light of the current American Neocons. Beside receiving a big chunk of cash from AIPAC, and Mudroach (MAYBE YOU MORON WANT ME TO TELL YOU THAT MUDROACH OWNS FOX NEWS – A TV station that dragged our ass into Iraq.) Or maybe you dont know what AIPAC stands for?

Besides, her arm pits are far too dirty and her hands covered with slime, coz her history is far more blacker than Obama. She has dinned and went to bed with war profiteers, and she keeps calling these same bunch of losers “True Americans”, while Obama said he doesnt want them in his government. Hillary is crowing on their behalf, and the remain the hidden source of her funding. No wonder Bill said he would be touring the world with Bush Sr to fix the image of naught Jr. Bush. Maybe thats what Hillary would coming to do. Help redeem the image of I-love-to-Bomb-countries-up-George?

I would give up on trying to convince F****Kers like you to vote someone who could change the image of the country entirely, I guess Americans havent learnt anything from Bush. If we had we wont be voting a loser like Hillary whose overall achivement is in building a Hippie Museum in NY and supporting the war and giving her backing for another war in Iran…..
Tell me more about her achivements? Seems like her entire supporters are either racists, corrupt business men, and idiots who can’t think like her.

Congrats to Hillary on her victory. And congrats to the morons supporting her. And congrats to TP who hated Fox News so much yet, their #1 candidate is been funded by the Ceos of FOX.

By: Lefty Patriot

Lefty Patriot — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:15:42 +0000

She is a PHONY.

Comment by milesL â€” January 20, 2008 @ 8:26 pm

proof?

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:58:56 +0000

#355: My fear is that intense hatred for Hillary Clinton will unite the Republican party and push them into the White House.

Yep, I agree with you. Not only are there many Republicans who hate her, but also a lot of mainstream media types. Since Clinton and Obama are so similar on policy, that was my motivation for supporting Obama. I think he’ll generally receive fairer coverage, and I think he has a better chance of capturing undecided independent voters. I acknowledge, though, that much of the intense hatred directed at Hillary Clinton isn’t entirely her fault–much of it seems pretty irrational to me.

By: milesL

milesL — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:26:02 +0000

She is a PHONY.

By: Lefty Patriot

Lefty Patriot — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:05:14 +0000

My fear is that intense hatred for Hillary Clinton will unite the Republican party and push them into the White House.

Comment by Marie â€” January 20, 2008 @ 11:54 am

it’s not that many people, but they make a lot of noise. We could run Cher and destroy the old white men of the CorporoFascist party. Don’t worry, do your homework, help with GOTV when the time comes. i worked on Ned Lamont’s campaign, and we beat lieberman against all odds. Even though he threw in with the enemy, we still proved what could be done.

By: Lefty Patriot

Lefty Patriot — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:44:30 +0000

Then why did she vote for the Kyle-Lieberman resolution.

I take it you never have read it.

Or heard about it.

Comment by justasking â€” January 20, 2008 @ 2:40 pm

Why not? She’s gong to kick rightard ass for four, or eaight, years. it’s her due. I will enjoy it.

By: Fred

Fred — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:48:27 +0000

hey there justaskin……you ready to play some more?
your statement fact or fiction….doesn’t change my statement….bush is still much worse…nice try though for a troll. Please try to make a valid point in the future.

By: Fred

Fred — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:13:30 +0000

I mean I never had to worry about unitary presidential powers under clinton…I never had to worry about unilateral premtive war with clinton…..all I’m saying is…..there are some serious differences.

By: Fred

Fred — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:11:02 +0000

Well…..I do draw a distintion……..bush is much worse…just my opinion.

By: tarazan

tarazan — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:27:32 +0000

The election system does not allow outsiders in both parties…before someone thinks of running,he should understand how the system works…unless a candidate has big cash in the bank…big names behind him..,big connections and corporate backing….there no chance for any outsider to make it,brains comes secondery to that…and we have solid evidence of that..we are living it.

The media does not care to cover stories about Gravel, Kucinich, Nader, or Paul ….they like stories about Hillary, the Bush dynasty..the Kennedys..etc..etc…
So sit down and enjoy the new American dynasties’ show in action called elections….since 1988: Bush…Clinton…Bush… Clinton….

By: Marie

Marie — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:54:44 +0000

My fear is that intense hatred for Hillary Clinton will unite the Republican party and push them into the White House.

By: Fred

Fred — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:20:18 +0000

Fineâ€¦ then lets waterboard her just for the fun of it.

*bert

Comment by BERT CONVY

you will get lots of support for this idea……..lol

By: Fred

Fred — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:06:21 +0000

351 I understand your anx but you can’t even jail bush and as much as I dislike hillary…..she is not guilty of the crimes that bush has committed.

By: Lefty Patriot

Lefty Patriot — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:56:15 +0000

He only knows the liberal revisionist version of history, which of course, is faulty to itâ€™s very core.

In other words, Lefty Patriot is a known liar. But see how popular known liars are to their fellow liberal/progressives? Says a lot about how gullible liberal/progressive fellow travelers are, doesnâ€™t it?

Comment by O. Bigfoot â€” January 20, 2008 @ 10:26 am

oh I was there for the Reagan Revolution. The best part was the assassination attempt, too bad Hinckley was such a lousy shot. I was there when Reagan attempted to destroy the middle class, did his “cut and run” after allowing the deaths of 241 Marines in Lebanon, when he trades arms to terrorists for hostages, when he undercut the working people of America, and when he weakened the economic structure of the USA and started the selling out to China. Reagan was a cose second to Benedict Arnold as leading traitor of America, until the bushes came along. Only a family that happily and proudly dealt with the Nazis well into WW2 could eclipse Reagan’s treason. Your knowledge of histpry is, like y8our patriotism, non-existent, bigfoot. And you’re a coward.

By: Fred

Fred — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:53:19 +0000

FYI, the raygun era was a nightmare for America. Working class families sent thier mothers to work so they could survive…..can we say family values……

As usual when a repub pres is in office there was a devistating econoic corruption scandal. Can we say S&L

Oh, and selling arms to our enemies….Iran/contra thats not treason is it olly north..

unions backs were for the forseeable future…broken.