Last night, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney broke a WGA picket line and appeared on The Tonight Show. Jay Leno asked Romney, “Have you ever lost your cool? Have you ever just exploded at a guy?” Romney replied, “Absolutely, but not a reporter,” adding that he has nothing but “respect” for them. A look at what Romney and his campaign consider “respect” for the press:
UPDATE: TP commenter Bartlebee disagrees with our post: “I saw a very agressive reporter pressing him over and over trying to back him into a corner. I think the reporter was just doing his job, and was probably right, but he also was very agressive, and Romney smiled, was polite, calm and courteous.”
Another Liar-In-Chief in the making.
Taped evidence says otherwise than you & your spokespeople, Willard…
January 19th, 2008 at 3:11 pmCompare Romney’s robot-blowing-a-fuse performance this week with his reaction to a Boston Globe reporter confronting him over illegal aliens hired to landscape his home:
Asked by a reporter yesterday about his use of Community Lawn Service with a Heart, Romney, who was hosting the Republican Governors Association conference in Miami, said, “Aw, geez,” and walked away.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:14 pmThis makes a presumption that this person has ever been cool or has at least a generalized understanding of cool. This due is Raymond Shaw.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:24 pmComments by John Kerry
You’ve never had any cool to lose.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:26 pm.
Mittens…
Another self absorbed Christian who brags about how many people he’s put to death.
.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:27 pm“Due” looks like a lady. Sorry
January 19th, 2008 at 3:28 pmI have to agree with #8, this seems pretty trivial. Even if Glen was correct, which I’m sure he is, he was being out of line with his questioning and Mitt did a good job of maintaining his composure.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:29 pmComment by John Kerry
can you say olly north(indicted criminal)
January 19th, 2008 at 3:32 pmcan you say Scooter libby(same)
more of the same…..all repubs….hangem high.
I think TP owes Romney an apology on this one.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Mitty is an offense to the human race….when the repubs start apologizing for true offenses…..not just a bad call…..think about the media on the right bart…..have you seen any apologies for the way they have covered things?
January 19th, 2008 at 3:35 pmI saw a very agressive reporter pressing him over and over trying to back him into a corner. I think the reporter was just doing his job, and was probably right, but he also was very agressive, and Romney smiled, was polite, calm and courteous.
I think TP owes Romney an apology on this one.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
You are right, Romney did not lose his cool in that situation. The OTHER people around him (potentially on his staff) sure did. The old woman calling the reporter names, saying he was ugly and overly confrontational?
It is the JOB of the press to be confrontational. The problem today is that too many members of the press are not confrontational ENOUGH. The reporter was right, Romney was attempting to move the goalposts and change the frame in mid-sentence. Romney stated, “I don’t have lobbyists running my campaign. I don’t have lobbyists tied to my…” and was immediately confronted on such a falsehood. He instantly shifted the framing to make it appear that he ONLY said “running my campaign”, when in fact he also included “involved in.”.
He was busted, dead to rights.
He did not, however, come close to losing his cool.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:39 pmWhat is it with these idiots now days, that do not understand that we capture what they say/do on video and even they lie, we can re-run the truth over again, to point out they lie.
Does any one of these political fckwits have even one small bit of honor?
January 19th, 2008 at 3:40 pmHe did not lose his cool. He did intentionally mislead.
We need MORE media asking even tougher questions than this, not less.
Interrupting a staged monologue to demand clarification is the media’s JOB.
Romney ALMOST said “I don’t have any lobbyists involved in my campaign” – which would have absolutely been false.
Had he not been interrupted, he was about to lie.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:42 pmHe did not, however, come close to losing his cool.
Comment by Moderation — January 19, 2008 @ 3:39 pm
No, he didn’t lose his cool. He lied as coldly as any sociopath I have ever seen.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:43 pmI think your are probably an idealist and this is politics…..compare repub media treatment to dem media treatment and get back to me.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:44 pmOh Bla, Bla, Bla…..Hay TP can we have something of substance here to post on….Forget the rep. he said, Dem. she said and get on with the real new’s…….80 people died in Iraq…..How many more must die while the republican’s count their peices of gold hanging around bull shit’s neck given to him by the saudi prince that helped finance the bomber’s of 9/11..Who can lie enough and kiss media butt long enough to get elected is still ten month’s out…Blessings
January 19th, 2008 at 3:49 pmOne day Fred, people who think like you, and believe it or not, George Bush, will realize that part of being superior to the bad guy, is being superior to the bad guy.
:|
Think on that for a bit prior to responding.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
ok bart…..I’ll let it go now but please reflect on your own statement and honestly tell me that it is not the words of an idealist. You may be right about me……..but george???
January 19th, 2008 at 3:51 pmCan you libs say BJ Clinton interviewed by Chris Wallace?????
Can you say Howard Dean???
Can you say Hillary???
Comment by John Kerry — January 19, 2008 @ 3:23 pm
smatta, jk, still chafed over the destruction of wimp Wallace by the Big Dog? Wallace really cowered in that one, hahahahaha!
January 19th, 2008 at 3:51 pmsmatta, jk, still chafed over the destruction of wimp Wallace by the Big Dog? Wallace really cowered in that one, hahahahaha!
Comment by Lefty Patriot
it was one for the record books…..probably be a historic example for them…..don’t let this happen to you….
January 19th, 2008 at 3:55 pmHay, John Kerry…Back under the bridge with the muckie one’s…Troll.
January 19th, 2008 at 3:59 pmBartlebee, maybe were there already…..Blessings
January 19th, 2008 at 4:01 pmAnd who cares WHO wins at that point?
It won’t matter any more.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 3:57 pm
Agreed, we are better than that, or damn well should be.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:01 pmLying to win is what THEY do Fred, not us.
When we start doing what they do, then we’ll be them.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
I’m sorry bart, I re-read this and it just doesn’t sound like a smear. It just implies that he and his people were not very nice and threw it open for discussion. I refuse to allow you to compare that to what rush does which is to take something completely out of context and skew it to suit his needs…..not the same to me.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:02 pmGood Day to ya Wayne, good to read you here…..Blessings
January 19th, 2008 at 4:03 pmjk, who could possibly care what you think? nobody here, that’s for sure. your lies are your calling card, take them to redstate.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:10 pmI think Mitt did “lose his cool”, though it was minor and “composure” might be a better word. However, the real question is; how many MSM outlets will run a story about Mitt getting caught in a lie?
BTW, I think the reporter should have let him finish and hit him at the end, but, I can understand how one would become frustrated having to listen to these creeps day after day. Personally, If I were forced to listen to one of these stump speeches, I would probably end up screaming obscenities.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:11 pmI agree with everyone who says that the headline for this article is a mistake. Romney clearly didn’t “lose his cool”. Now, to be fair, the article leads up to the video with these words:
A look at what Romney considers “respect†for the press:
But even that isn’t really reflective of the video, because Romney and his staff treated the reporter with a modicum of respect.
What they DIDN’T respect was the truth. If the AP reporter had allowed Romney to finish his sentence, I think he could have caught him in a lie, because it sounded like Mittens was abut to say, “I don’t have lobbyists tied to my campaign“. Glen Johnson jumped the gun and allowed Romney the wiggle room to backtrack and cling to his “I don’t have lobbyists runnng my campaign” floatation device.
I mean, come on, why does a staffer (or “unpaid advisor”) have to “attend senior strategy meetings” in order to be considered part of a campaign?
Because that’s the only way that Mittens can skate out from under the snow cave of lies that was about to collapse on top of him.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:16 pmsomebody mentioned Howard Dean’s scream….still seems like a harmless bit of enthusiasm….Too bad we haven’t had 7 years of Dean is stead of the cr@p the GOP has to sell.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:16 pmAll he did was to defend his position after being wrongfully accused by the far left reporter who obviously was looking to make a name for himself with the libs.
what he did was lie. he’s the perfect candidate for a loser like you, jk.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:17 pmAll he did was to defend his position after being wrongfully accused by the far left reporter who obviously was looking to make a name for himself with the libs. Romney in NO WAY “blew his cool†and in fact I think SHOWED his “cool†in this instance!
Congratulations BARTLEBEE for recognizing the truth!!
Comment by John Kerry — January 19, 2008 @ 4:04 pm
Umm. Bart’s point that TPs headline should change is valid. It should change from, “Romney insists he has never ‘lost his cool’ with a reporter” to, “Romney caught on tape LYING about lobbyists in his campaign.”
Romney certainly didn’t lose his cool. Rather, he coolly and calmly LIED, stating, “I don’t have lobbyists tied to my [campaign].” He was called out by a reporter who was actually doing his job.
Bartlebee is 100% correct about TP needing to change the title of this thread. Bart is not, however, saying what you seem to be implying. Bart seems to recognize the truth: Mitt Romney was caught, on film, LYING to the press, and was called on it.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:18 pmIf we followed the media’s treatment of the Dean scream, who cares how cool Mittster is, just go ahead and deride him endlessly and shamelessly.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:18 pmToo bad we haven’t had 7 years of Dean is stead of the cr@p the GOP has to sell.
Comment by jb — January 19, 2008 @ 4:16 pm
that’s why the repigs have to steal every election they can. Dems are always making them look bad.
If you want another 9/11, vote Republican.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:18 pmSome $hit for brains troll is asking for fair treatment of the Mormon dude at the same time he is still carrying on about Dean’s “scream”. Typical hypocritical GOP stooge.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:21 pmI suppose it depends upon the definition of cool. Anyone under the spotlight will have incidents. The thing is Romney just isn’t cool. He is tragically waspy uncool at best
January 19th, 2008 at 4:21 pmI don’t like Romney in the least – he’s a skank. But I don’t consider the video evidence of him losing his cool with a reporter.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:25 pm.
GOP attacks care little for facts or being fair…they just keep trashing opponents until something catches the imagination of the media dead public.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:26 pm“BTW, I think the reporter should have let him finish and hit him at the end, but, I can understand how one would become frustrated having to listen to these creeps day after day. Personally, If I were forced to listen to one of these stump speeches, I would probably end up screaming obscenities.”
Comment by Impolitics
I do not agree. After Mitt would have been finished then the whole gaggle would have been led around by their nose, like they have been for so long, and the reporter would have been making his point (asking his question) into the wind. And we know we have seen the criminal bush/cheney cabal do this too effortlessly to think that a different tactic must be tried. I commend the reporter for speaking up at all, given them Neo-traitors around him
January 19th, 2008 at 4:28 pmFu(k Mitt, THAT IS Mitt loosing his cool. He is a friggin Mormon, moron.
If you vote Democrat, you may be in for a 1/19. Nice symmetry there, if you can consider the results nice. Martial law and cancellation of election results as Herr Fuhrer Bush assumes the reins of the nation for the thousand year whatever.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:30 pmWhat are you referring to walt?
January 19th, 2008 at 4:31 pmNothing cool about a money grubbing war monger.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:33 pmI have no problem with Romney’s handling of this situation. I don’t think he was rude or inappropriate. I think it’s fine if the press wants to investigate his claims to find out whether or not they’re true, but I don’t think this is an example of Romney “losing his cool.” This is a non-story.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:35 pmI’m pretty sure Walt is indicating the (albeit very small) possibility of Bush/Cheney refusing to leave office, by declaring martial law and putting his various executive orders in to motion.
Which, considering the last day of Bush’s presidency is 1/19, is indeed a nice symmetry to 9/11, the act which allowed the focus of power in to a unitary executive to come to fruition.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:36 pmErr, the DAY which allowed the focus, rather.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:37 pmAll he did was to defend his position after being wrongfully accused
Comment by John Kerry — January 19, 2008 @ 4:04 pm
He was not being “wrongfully accused”. He was asked a question, lied, got caught and then continued to lie. How can that be confusing for you?
January 19th, 2008 at 4:38 pmIf you want to turn troll and start smearing lipstick on this pig, thats your business.
But the headline is still nonetheless misleading at best, and misleading is a polite way of saying its lying.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Ok bart. If you can’t accept and allow me to have my point of view and resort to calling me a troll then I guess I understand. You speak eloquently of fairness yet my opinion seems not to matter…you have stated catagorically that I am wrong and that is the end of the disscussion with you apparantly. I’ve seen that tactic used here before. I was just trying to discuss it with you but you have decided that you should tell me exactly what is going on and you have. You even have support for your side of the discussion. Since the known trolls agree with you, you must be right……signing off.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:40 pmThis is a non-story.
Comment by Jim — January 19, 2008 @ 4:35 pm
I am not sure anyone claimed it was. Think of things like this more as the writing prompts your high school English teacher employed. TP was simply providing the basis of the discussion which ensued. Maybe the dust particle that provides the nucleus for cloud formation analogy, either way…
January 19th, 2008 at 4:40 pmComment by 99Luf Balloons — January 19, 2008 @ 4:28 pm
I agree with your post. The reporter actually accomplished something. And caught this lying sack of crap on tape doing it. If he hadn’t spoken up when he did the whole group would have been whisked away and absolutely nothing would have been accomplished. Mitt right now is talking about how Washington is broken while he has a lobbyist as one of his top advisors. We wouldn’t see the irony if this reporter hadn’t done his job.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:44 pmIf we’re gonna say it, lets say it right.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 4:35 pm
we all respect your sentiment here, bu we can expect no such gentleman’s rules when the GOP pigs open their mouth’s.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:46 pmBart, answering quickly by lying shows a lack of composure. Following up with an answer that shows you were lying but were using semantics to obfuscate shows a definite lack of reason. The kind that gets people convicted in a court of law when they are being questioned about a crime. Mitt got caught splitting hairs and now you’re doing the same here. Many of us consider a guy telling a bald faced lie to a reporter who knows the facts, on tape is losing his cool. You don’t have to like it, but it’s how we feel.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:48 pmI don’t think superior has anything to do with it bart….I think you simply must be right.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:49 pmActually, TP’s headline isn’t misleading at all. it’s just the truth as Romney sees it. TP never accuses Romney of losing his cool. TP points out that Romney’s “respect” for the press includes lying to them. Then Romney’s handler tries to insist that the reporter behave himself, as if that is some kind of requirement. TP is on the money here.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:49 pmI refuse to allow you to compare that to what rush does which is to take something completely out of context and skew it to suit his needs
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 4:02 pm
Sounds like its you thats refusing to “allow†me my opinion.
Which happens to be obviously correct.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
and taking statements out of context and posting them to suit your needs is exactly the way rush does it…..dishonestly.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:51 pmThats why being superior to the bad guys means BEING SUPERIOR TO THE BAD GUYS.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 4:47
No that’s bringing a knife to a gun fight. Some of us are tired of losing these battles. You play the game your way and we’ll play it ours. You don’t run this site do you Bart? Until you do the final dictate on every issue isn’t really your’s.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:53 pmTheres no “gray†area here Fred, and this isn’t Romper Room. Wrong is wrong.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
there is always a grey area unless you are a child or you have no respect for anyone’s opinion except your own.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:54 pmThe headline does not imply that Romney lost his cool in this instance. The copy does question Romney’s respect for reporters, and rightly.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:54 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 4:47 pm
Blessed are those who think themselves to be superior to those who think they are superior.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:55 pmI don’t think superior has anything to do with it bart….I think you simply must be right.
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 4:49 pm
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head here Fred. Not point in getting aggravated just know we see your point.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:55 pmBart, I respect greatly the value you put on right and wrong. I think we are both way off base today and would like to end this peacefully if possible. Can we just agree to disagree and move on?
January 19th, 2008 at 4:59 pmSure Bart we’re all wrong and you’re the only one right. How nice. It must be great to be you.
January 19th, 2008 at 4:59 pmSure Bart we’re all wrong and you’re the only one right. How nice. It must be great to be you.
Comment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 4:59 pm
Isn’t that always the way with Bart?
January 19th, 2008 at 5:01 pmI explained it once Bart and you chose to ignore it. By coming up with a quick reply that turned out to be a lie and then trying to spin the lie digging his whole deeper is losing his cool.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:01 pmWell f$#$k you all, and the donkey you rode in on.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:00 pm
how about you showing us where TP states that Romney lost his cool?
January 19th, 2008 at 5:02 pmEverytime you don’t like my opinion, in comes Shayne, Dbadass, and others, to pile on and attack.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:00 pm
Who is the “you” you are addressing Bart? Many of us didn’t agree with your opinion. Now it’s a vast leftist conspiracy. Because you are NEVER wrong.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:03 pmTell the truth, or be as much my enemy as the neocons.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:02 pm
Ooooh, we’re scared to death. WTF!
January 19th, 2008 at 5:04 pmTell the truth, or be as much my enemy as the neocons.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:02 pm
Well, you were going to move on after you lost the last fight you started. So much for the truth. But leave the Canadians alone. they didn’t do anything to deserve you.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:04 pmRead the fA$#King headline you stupid inbred hack.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:03 pm
Try that yourself, you pain is the ass. Nice to know that self-named liberals can be sociopaths too.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:05 pmMy apologies…….I had no idea.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:06 pmRomney insists he has never ‘lost his cool’ with a reporter.
Apparently, to Bart, this means exactly the same thing as “Romney lost his cool.”
January 19th, 2008 at 5:06 pmRomney insists he has never ‘lost his cool’ with a reporter.
Last night, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney broke a WGA picket line and appeared on The Tonight Show. Jay Leno asked Romney, “Have you ever lost your cool? Have you ever just exploded at a guy?†Romney replied, “Absolutely, but not a reporter,â€
Jay Leno asked the question, Mitt Romney answered the question and TP presents what was said on the show. Does the headline say Mitt Romney Loses His Cool? No it doesn’t.
Who’s the knuckle dragger here, Bart?
January 19th, 2008 at 5:07 pmApparently, to Bart, this means exactly the same thing as “Romney lost his cool.â€
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 5:06 pm
Not only that, in the body copy, TP points out that Romney treats reporters with respect, and demostrates that “respect” with the video. Apparently, bartie doesn’t bother with the small print.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:08 pmYou SICKEN me, and I swear to all that is I will never, ever side with dirty lying peice of shit like YOU.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:10 pm
Actually, you’re doing a good job replacing Mr. P, with meltdowns like that. Learn to read the whole post, you illiterate putz.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:12 pmYou make me sick.
I mean I want to PUKE.
Like a filthy inbred troll, you sit there, reading the headline and because it doesn’t come right out and say the exact words, ROMNEY LOST HIS COOL, you act like that isn’t the ENTIRE POINT OF THE ARTICLE.
You SICKEN me, and I swear to all that is I will never, ever side with dirty lying peice of shit like YOU.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:10 pm
This seems a little extreme, Bart.
I’m just sayin’…
January 19th, 2008 at 5:12 pmWell PROVE IT Miss Sally. PROVE it.
Don’t run your mouth. Show me where he lost his cool or admit you’re just a bunch of liars.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:06 pm
I’ve said it several times, I THINK him lying and getting caught is losing his cool. TP, on the other hand, NEVER says he lost his cool. And yet you’re insisting they did and ask for an apology. If you don’t like the way TP puts up it’s posts maybe you should go to a site that you can agree with 100% of the time because this site is obviously not here JUST to keep YOU happy.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:13 pmWell I have learned something here today. Theres not much difference on BOTH sides. BOTH of you are a bunch of dirty liars, and you both SICKEN me.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:13 pm
Well, then, I guess you’ll be done with us.
Please?
January 19th, 2008 at 5:15 pmHey Bart, it’s ok man. Let it go…..this is not as big a deal as you think. I want to discuss other things with ya on another day dude…..seriously man take a break and get some air.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:15 pmYou SICKEN me, and I swear to all that is I will never, ever side with dirty lying peice of shit like YOU.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:10 pm
Thanks, and that’s just the way I want it. You think you can bully everybody into agreeing with you and saying what you want to hear. Well this thread’s not about you. However every thread you’re on you try to make it about you. Which really shows if you’re not a troll you might as well be. Why not get paid for all the crap you spew. Can’t imagine with that attitude of your’s you can hold a regular job.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:16 pmBart, are you SURE you’re not a conservative?
I swear I’d recognize that black-or-white thinking anywhere.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:16 pmI swear I’d recognize that black-or-white thinking anywhere.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 5:16 pm
bullseye
January 19th, 2008 at 5:17 pmMaybe you should go f$#k yourself.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:14 pm
YOU FIRST.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:17 pmGo BARTLEBEE go!!!!
Comment by John Kerry — January 19, 2008 @ 5:16 pm
that’s what I said.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:17 pmWhat a terrific yet surreal examination of the “loss of cool”
January 19th, 2008 at 5:18 pmDon’t let the door hit you in the ass …
January 19th, 2008 at 5:19 pmGo BARTLEBEE go!!!!
Comment by John Kerry — January 19, 2008 @ 5:16 pm
Uh-oh… Bart’s drawn the endorsement of Troll JK. That’s kinda like Rush endorsing Joe Lieberman.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:19 pmMaybe I could try the Whigs.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:17 pm
Maybe you could try therapy.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:19 pmWhat a terrific yet surreal examination of the “loss of coolâ€
Comment by dbadass — January 19, 2008 @ 5:18 pm
Definitely a case study.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:19 pmI find it amusing that even when Bart posts something really amusing he never gets any recommendations. I bet he wonders why.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:20 pmI find it amusing that even when Bart posts something really amusing he never gets any recommendations. I bet he wonders why.
Comment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 5:20 pm
Maybe sometimes, in his more reasonable moments, he wonders why. But when he gets like this, I’m sure he blames it all on a vast liberal conspiracy.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:22 pmI am so sick of liars, and now, just out of PARTISANSHIP, here you guys are LYING, trying to defend an articles accusations that clearly has no defense.
So much for the progressives.
:|
Maybe I could try the Whigs.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:17 pm
Be careful everyone. Crazy Bart has pulled out his emoticons.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:23 pmOops. I guess I was wrong. he doesn’t blame it on a liberal conspiracy. He blames it on partisan hacks who are only here for a social club.
There is a difference.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:24 pmWhen the left loses its partisan HACKS like you we’ll be doing something.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:22 pm
Thanks for letting us Progressives be so inclusive. Is there anyone else you want to exclude from the Democratic Party?
hmmm…..
let me guess….
Of yeah, anyone who doesn’t agree with you.
So Bart are you going to do the thinking for all of us and then just tell us how we should think?
January 19th, 2008 at 5:26 pmwhen no SANE person could watch that video and decide that Mitt lost his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:24 pm
disqualified.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:26 pmSo Bart are you going to do the thinking for all of us and then just tell us how we should think?
Comment by dim wit — January 19, 2008 @ 5:26
he’s the model for Jonah Goldberg’s new “book”, Liberal Fascism.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:27 pmAnd just like before, all they have are their insults and lies, because not one of them can show where Mitt lost his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:24 pm
Its called an “opinion”
Some people think he “lost his cool” and others do not. But i forgot, you’re the only one who is allowed to be correct.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:28 pmall they have are their insults and lies
So says Bart, fresh off of calling others:
LIARS
partisan HACKS
Scumbag
dirty lying piece of shit
dicwads (sic)
pisspot
oh, and — “dirty LIARS”.
Well argued, Bart.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:28 pmAnd lefty Patriots always there too.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:27 pm
and always destroying your cockamamie ignorance. boo-hoo for you.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:28 pmno I’m Fred…..sorry bart…..I’m just Fred and I’m new here.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:28 pmAnd there he is.
POOF, its magic.
See folks, Fred is DIM WIT, like I said over a week ago.
And he’s also Ralph.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:26 pm
Sure but you have confused us all for others at one time or another
January 19th, 2008 at 5:30 pmHow did I know that?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:26 pm
Even paranoids have enemies, I guess. Everybody who disagrees with you is just one troll with 30 different names? Yeah, that’s the ticket.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:31 pmSee this peice of human shit, has followed me since getting his clock cleaned on a debate about atheism, and to this day, whenever he senses an opening, he attacks, under one of his many handles.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:26 pm
I am no one other than dim wit. I am not Fred or Shayne or anyone else.
And I “attack” you because you are child you goes off on flying rampages. I poke you with a stick not necessarily because I disagree with you, but rather, because I find you tyraids entertaining.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:31 pmno I’m Fred…..sorry bart…..I’m just Fred and I’m new here.
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 5:28 pm
Don’t worry, fred, bi-polar bart has decided to vent his spleen on all of us liars and partisans of the left. it’s not new, the only thing that’s new is that a few have decided to push back and show him the error of his ways, which is unacceptable to his authoritatrian side. he’s our resident Dr. Jerkoff and Mr. High. And, like most emotionally-stunted folks, he can’t stand to lose.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:33 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:31 pm
If you can just pace yourself you will be on track for beating out Daryll for the most coveted of awards: my Fav!
January 19th, 2008 at 5:33 pmReferring to yourself in the third person enhances your credibility, sure it does.
I’m going to just throw this out there but maybe there are a certain amount of us who don’t like being bullied or told what to think and we get our haunches up when you start your tactics. But don’t let reason stand in the way of your delusions.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:34 pmComment by dbadass — January 19, 2008 @ 5:30 pm
Its always the same group of inbred c0cksuckers.
And you’re one of them.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:31 pm
Welcome to the club db!
January 19th, 2008 at 5:34 pmBut don’t let reason stand in the way of your delusions.
Comment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 5:34 pm
Well, I’m sure he’ll be consistent in that respect.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:35 pmAll you’ve done is come in looking for trouble, and starting trouble.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:34 pm
Yep.
I couldn’t believe how lucky I was when I saw you on TP this afternoon.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:36 pmAll I said was Romney didn’t lose his cool, which he didn’t.
All you’ve done is come in looking for trouble, and starting trouble.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:34 pm
You expressed your opinion, based on a misreading of the post. You brought the trouble upon yourself, and in your typically stubborn fashion, refused to see that you misinterpreted the headline. You lose, again. Get used to it, or get lost.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:37 pmAnd I’m Ralph, no one else. And Bart, since you and I have tangled before and none of these others showed up (I think Lefty Patriot may have been there), I don’t know whether you’re deluded, or a liar.
I can see where it might make you feel better to think that all the posters who disagree with you (or at least your methods) are just manifestations of a single mischievous keyboard commando. It would be easier to accept, I suppose, than the fact that there are several people who disagree with you, people who tend to make thoughtful, if snarky comments on other threads and may even agree with you occasionally.
But sadly for you, you’re wrong. I haven’t posted under anything but this handle for months. Obviously I don’t know for sure about Lefty, dim wit, Shayne or Fred, but as they all have distinct voices on this forum, I strongly suspect they are all distinct people too.
People disagree with you. Get over it.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:38 pmI couldn’t believe how lucky I was when I saw you on TP this afternoon.
Comment by dim wit — January 19, 2008 @ 5:36 pm
Sometimes I see Bart as Joe Pesce in “Goodfellas” in the scene, “Am I a clown, you think I’m here to amuse you …” Entertaining as heck.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:40 pmOh but hes’ not one of you….
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:37 pm
Neither are you Bart, NEITHER ARE YOU.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:41 pmShow everyone, WHERE, or admit you’re just a bunch of liars.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:38 pm
show everyone where TP claimed that Romney lost his cool, as opposed to the “respect” they were demonstrating in the video. and if you don’t think that a frozen, fake, sociopathic smile while lying isn’t losing one’s cool, that’s fine, but it’s just your opinion. either way, you’ve misread the post, or misinterpreted the meaning of “cool”. Or both. Yeah, I’ll go for “both”, since you seem to be getting good at losing your foodfights.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:42 pmYou’re a dingleberry on my ass cheek, that I’ll wipe like I do everytime your inbred self starts shit with me.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:39 pm
Always the high road, doing liberals proud.
What a loser.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:44 pmPROVE I’m wrong, and show us where Romney lost his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:43 pm
It’s just your opinion, moron. And it’s becoming less and less valid as you stomp and pout. Watching the video, and watching your behavior, it’s becoming clear why you can’t see what’s clear to many others.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:46 pmEver since that day I beat Dim Wit in a debate.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:37 pm
I must have missed this epic battle but no doubt..
Many Shuvs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Slor that day, I can tell you
January 19th, 2008 at 5:48 pmAfter all, thats the entire premise of your attacks on me, (or are they just personal, as I stated earlier?) right?
PROVE I’m wrong, and show us where Romney lost his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
No bart the entire discussion started as a comparison between the way left and right leaning media handles things….I thought your demand for an apology from TP was a non starter…
by the way I have a dialup so I haven’t even seen the vidio…..
Bart, how are you going to be able to come back and enter a disscussion here now?
January 19th, 2008 at 5:48 pmIt is a clear challenge, and you prove what a LIAR you are, by even suggesting otherwise.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:45 pm
That’s your narrow, self-interested view of it. I’m not even saying it’s wrong, because it’s a viewpoint, but other viewpoints are no less wrong.
Especially mine, which is well thought-out, and includes the entire post. You can accuse TP of claiming that which it didn’t, but that makes you look like a troll. Romney’s behavior is despicable and very uncool in a democracy, and that’s a fact.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:49 pmBart’s world:
Bart’s opinion = Fact
Other’s differing opinion = Lies
hmm… kinda sounds like a troll’s world, doesn’t it? Kinda like Daryll maybe? Or O’Biggie? Maybe Southern Man?
Oh my God! They MUST ALL BE THE SAME PERSON!
January 19th, 2008 at 5:49 pmBart, how are you going to be able to come back and enter a disscussion here now?
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 5:48 pm
oh, he’ll bull his way in. he’s not always wrong, just sometimes.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:50 pmEveryone agreed with me,…..until you bozos stumbled in.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:50 pm
You’re even wrong about that. it just isn’t your day to bully everybody here. You have no grace.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:52 pmGee.
Everyone agreed with me,…..until you bozos stumbled in.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
I didn’t from the start Bart……
January 19th, 2008 at 5:52 pmBart, how are you going to be able to come back and enter a disscussion here now?
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 5:48 pm
Bart has no shame, he’ll show up another day like none of this happened.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:54 pmWhat is the best way to footnote #114
January 19th, 2008 at 5:54 pmSee, fred? he won’t be reasoned with. he’s fine as long as everybody agrees with him. I usually ignore him because to take issue with him results in this. Even in matters of opinion he has to be right. It’s his fatal weakness.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:55 pmGee.
Everyone agreed with me,…..until you bozos stumbled in.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:50 pm
Including me, as I’m sure you noted. I don’t agree with Shayne that Romney’s lying was losing his cool. But I sure as hell wouldn’t call her a “liar” over it.
The objection I have with you is your troll-like tantrum, your infantile insults and your refusal to treat language as if it means something.
Nothing in the TP copy for this thread says the Romney lost his cool, but you continue to insist that it does. You even copied-and-pasted it as if it supported your position. That’s a little weird.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:56 pmI think Mitt “lost his cool”, in a small way, and get called a liar. My 9 year old grandson thinks my 13 year old grandson is “old”. Should I call him a liar?
January 19th, 2008 at 5:57 pmSee, fred? he won’t be reasoned with. he’s fine as long as everybody agrees with him. I usually ignore him because to take issue with him results in this. Even in matters of opinion he has to be right. It’s his fatal weakness.
Comment by Lefty Patriot
been here for about a week and this took me completely by surprise….I may have accidentally added fuel to it and I promise I will not make that mistake again.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:58 pmComment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 5:48 pm
Same way I did last time I beat your ass Dim Wit.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:51 pm
You’re delusional.
Bart, I have told you before I post from work. I work 8am-5pm CT. That is when you find the majority of my posts.
I was just checking e-mail today when I decided to drop by TP. I haven’t the time or the inclination to post under any other name other than dim wit.
By the way, your opinion regarding Mitt is just that – an opinion.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:58 pmWhy just me?
:|
I know why.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:55 pm
Maybe YOU need to go back and READ every post and see where some of us disagreed with other. We’re tired of doing all your work for you. You get more trollish by the day.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pmEver since I kicked Dim Wits ass in the atheism debate.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:53 pm
Hard to tell as the atheists didn’t really believe in the debate
January 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pmIf this isn’t a PERSONAL attack on me, why didn’t you guys jump on Wayne?
Or Ralph?
Or lyonya?
Or Moderation?
Or any of the others who agreed that Romney clearly was composed and that the headline of the article was misleading?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:55 pm
Possibly because none of the others who agreed with you called those who had differing views “LIARS”. Not to mention “Scumbag”, “pisspot” or “dirty lying piece of shit”.
Just a thought.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pmANYONE.
Who was honest.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:57 pm
anyonewho was honest would see that TP never made a statement that Romney “lost it” with that reporter. ANYONE. Who wasn’t an illiterate.
January 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pmOnly a liar paints a gray area where there is none.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:57 pm
Only a fool or a troll sees no gray area where there is one.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:00 pmI promise I will not make that mistake again.
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 5:58 pm
it won’t matter. Bart has been losing his cool for quite a while, now. he wanted to be King, and turned out to be Jester, and may never get over it. Nt your fault. You are entitled to your opinion. I agree that Romney was sweating bullets and was insulting and desperate, and just framing away. like bart.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:02 pmMaybe YOU need to go back and READ every post and see where some of us disagreed with other. We’re tired of doing all your work for you. You get more trollish by the day.
Comment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 5:59 pm
No liar.
Maybe you do.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:01 pm
Watch out, everybody! Bart’s about to unleash his big artillery: the “I’m Rubber, You’re Glue” cannon.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:03 pmNo liar.
Maybe you do.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:01 pm
Ever hear the one about drinking 7-Up or the one about not making trash but burning it?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:04 pmRomney is clearly SEEN SMILING throughout the incident.
He is SOFT SPOKEN. He clearly controls himself like a pro.
Anyone saying or implying that he “lost his cool†in that video presented here, is simply LYING.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Well bart, the same cannot be said for you today can it. I would advise against running for office of any kind, just sayin…..
January 19th, 2008 at 6:04 pmComment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 6:04 pm
I think it’s fair to say that Bart “lost his cool” here, even if Romney didn’t.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:05 pmMitt starts to sound angry, to me, at the 14 second mark when he says, “did you hear what I said”. Then he looks angry. To me, that counts as “losing one’s cool”.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:08 pmAnd I still think Mitt is Raymond Shaw
January 19th, 2008 at 6:08 pmTHEY CLEARLY ARE TRYING TO IMPLY ROMNEY LOST HIS COOL.
And you prove you’re no better than the right wing when you sit here and try to LIE, because you’re too much of a wimp to admit you’re wrong.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:02 pm
Your accusations are as foolish as your behavior, since I agree with TP, and not with you. Your opinion is not something I value very highly, because you don’t think things through very carefully, you argue from emotion and personal viewpoint, and you are extraordinarily rude and insulting instead of reasoned and thoughtful. These are troll-like behaviors, so it isn’t surprising that you elicit anti-troll responses from the regulars here, who obviously are tired of your act. You have been soundly defeated in arguments here, so your bullyboy tactics have been exposed, and have lost their effectiveness.
Sucks to be you.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:08 pmWatch out, everybody! Bart’s about to unleash his big artillery: the “I’m Rubber, You’re Glue†cannon.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 6:03 pm
Of course I had already gone back and reread it before I suggested Bart do the same. A logical person might have figured that out. But we’re talking about Bart here.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:09 pmI think it’s fair to say that Bart “lost his cool†here, even if Romney didn’t.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 6:05 pm
That’s because “b*tches” like me and all the “liars” here have driven him to it. He has delicate sensibilities.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:11 pmSay, Bart… if I’m the same person as Fred, dim wit, Lefty Patriot, et. al. how do you account for the fact that I agreed with your assessment of Romney’s behavior in the video when the others did not?
(By the way, I noticed that when you copied-and-pasted my comment, you stopped just short of including the line where I point out that TP was actually using the video to demonstrate “respect”, not “losing one’s cool”. Curious why you chose that point to edit?)
January 19th, 2008 at 6:15 pmFact: We’re not interested in letting you dictate the rules here at TP.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:15 pmFact: Some of us will fight back just because we don’t like being intimidated.
Fact: Not everybody feels the same way on every issue you do.
Fact: You seem to be your own kind of troll.
All these posts, and nothing but insults to bart.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Bart, to be honest, you are the one that took it to this level.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:16 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:14 pm
Diet Pepsi or Diet Coke? Go nuts my man!
January 19th, 2008 at 6:16 pmFACT: the video attached to the article CLEARLY shows Romney did NOT lose his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:14 pm
Fact: Romney clearly loses his cool at 14 seconds in, and takes a full 6 seconds to recover.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:16 pmFACT: Ralph, Shayne, Dim Wit, Fred, Ddumbass, aren’t concerned with the “truthâ€. They’re only concerned with following Bartlebee to launch personal attacks whenever they smell an opening.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:14 pm
FACT: That’s not an “opening” we smell, Bart.
well… maybe in a sense, it is. There IS an opening down there. And it does smell like Bart’s arguments.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:17 pmThe “good guys†don’t get a pass on lying anymore than the bad guys.
Thank goodness most of us here get that.
Thank goodness its only you clowns, who do not.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:15 pm
Fact: You are not one of the “good guys”.
Fact: There is no “most of us” for you. You are on your own. You made it that way not us. Live with it or change.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:17 pm(By the way, I noticed that when you copied-and-pasted my comment, you stopped just short of including the line where I point out that TP was actually using the video to demonstrate “respectâ€, not “losing one’s coolâ€. Curious why you chose that point to edit?)
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 6:15 pm
That’s bart’s famous “framing”, learned from the Republicans. It shows his intellectual dishonesty and willingness to lie to win.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:18 pmFor the record; I haven’t “attacked” anyone and resent the implication that I have.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:20 pmThank goodness its only you clowns, who do not.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:15 pm
No thank you Bart.
We needed the Thought Police around here to dictate what we are allowed to think and thankfully you are always here to tell us.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:20 pmShame is a shame.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:19 pm
January 19th, 2008 at 6:21 pmToo bad you don’t have any. Romney clearly lost his cool 14 seconds into the video.
post 68
I refuse to allow you to compare that to what rush does which is to take something completely out of context and skew it to suit his needs
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 4:02 pm
Sounds like its you thats refusing to “allow†me my opinion.
Which happens to be obviously correct.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
and taking statements out of context and posting them to suit your needs is exactly the way rush does it…..dishonestly.
Comment by Fred
seems we’ve already been here today bart.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:22 pmBart, TP has the RIGHT to write any threads it chooses any way it wants to. And all readers have a right to come here or not, post or not, agree or not. You don’t have the right to tell them how to do their job until you work here. It is typical troll behavior to tell them what or how they should run the site. Not all progressives think the same just like not all Americans think the same. Tough luck if you don’t like it. If TP makes you unhappy and you’re not a troll, why do you stay here or keep coming back. Doesn’t make much sense. You must be a troll and that’s why you’re treated like one.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:23 pmWhat happened to Worfeus Bart, get banned for troll behavior?
For the record; I haven’t “attacked†anyone and resent the implication that I have.
Comment by Impolitics — January 19, 2008 @ 6:20 pm
Yes you have. Bartlebee said so.
He’s never been wrong. Ask him.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:23 pmAfter all, why would TP post an article showing Romney DID NOT lose his cool, like the wonderboy is trying to assert, lol.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
Please demonstrate where I tried to assert… well, maybe before you do that, you should explain what you think I was trying to assert?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:23 pmTrying to invent some obscure meaning that somehow NO ONE got that came into this thread, lol.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
Bart, I implore you.
Please don’t bring the dictionary into this debate.
I can’t handle another of Bartlebee’s dictionary debates.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:24 pm(By the way, I noticed that when you copied-and-pasted my comment, you stopped just short of including the line where I point out that TP was actually using the video to demonstrate “respectâ€, not “losing one’s coolâ€. Curious why you chose that point to edit?)
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 6:15 pm
That’s bart’s famous “framingâ€, learned from the Republicans. It shows his intellectual dishonesty and willingness to lie to win.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — January 19, 2008 @ 6:18 pm
:D
So lets get it straight.
Now Lefty is agreeing with the Wonderkind, that TP actually wrote this article with the intention of declaring Romney was “COOL†during the questioning, lol.
Lets get that on record.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:21 pm
Wow. If that’s the conclusion you reached from that exchange, I can understand how you can make the weird arguments you make. You’ve obviously got some cognitive difficulties you’re dealing with. I wish you the best of luck with that.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:25 pmNow Lefty is agreeing with the Wonderkind, that TP actually wrote this article with the intention of declaring Romney was “COOL†during the questioning, lol.
Lets get that on record.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:21 pm
wow! Now you’re a cheap republican whore! good try, but you’ve lost your footing. we know that all of your attacks are personal and made because of the anger and frustration that comes with being a LOSER.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:25 pmI can’t handle another of Bartlebee’s dictionary debates.
Comment by dim wit — January 19, 2008 @ 6:24 pm
Are you nuts? They are as phat as Daryll’s God.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:26 pm(eating popcorn)
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 6:23 pm
Don’t you have a bible to read? or maybe some gays to bash?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:27 pmI can’t handle another of Bartlebee’s dictionary debates.
Comment by dim wit — January 19, 2008 @ 6:24 pm
Are you nuts? They are as phat as Daryll’s God.
Comment by dbadass — January 19, 2008 @ 6:26 pm
Especially if you can get him in a position where his argument depends on NOT defining a term. Then you get accused of playing “word games”. It’s kind of amusing.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:28 pmWhat happened to Worfeus, Bart? Did he get banned as a troll. Or are you going to say you weren’t Worfeus before you were Bart.
And most people here may not remember Worfeus but you got piled on plenty under that name. Back then did people pile on you just because you were Worfeus or because they disagreed with you. Think Bart, think.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:29 pmThats why being superior to the bad guys means BEING SUPERIOR TO THE BAD GUYS.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 4:47 pm
I’m sick and tired of BEING SUPERIOR TO THE BAD GUYS as they walk away with the prize.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:30 pmEspecially if you can get him in a position where his argument depends on NOT defining a term. Then you get accused of playing “word gamesâ€. It’s kind of amusing.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 6:28 pm
And when you bring up the Oxford dictionary he has to run off before he pees on himself, that’s fun too.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:30 pmI gotta say, this trick of Bart’s to try to claim that we were all actually arguing that TP supports Romney has got to go on his highlight reel.
I wonder if he can stick the landing? Let’s all watch, shall we…
January 19th, 2008 at 6:31 pmI may be paraoid but that don’t mean they’re not after me…..
January 19th, 2008 at 6:31 pmHey Bart I asked you a question. Were you or were you not Worfeus? Everytime the subject gets a little tough for you you ignore it.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:32 pmAnd they were clearly wrong, in this example, because he was anything but “losing his coolâ€.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:28 pm
“And they were clearly wrong because Bartlebee dictated so”
Bart, you are the absolute last person I would trust to be the judge of whether someone is “losing his cool” considering you seem to do just that on a daily basis.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:32 pmI wonder if he can stick the landing? Let’s all watch, shall we…
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 6:31 pm
I suspect he’ll end on with a less than perfect 6 when he falls on his ass.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:33 pmWhat happened Bart, things getting too tough for you?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:34 pmThe topic is Worfeus, who is he and what happened to him.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:35 pmHellooooo, is anybody out there?
“I can’t handle another of Bartlebee’s dictionary debates.”
Comment by dim wit
Amen to that.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:36 pmSomeone must have pulled the plug on Bartlebee’s computer. No way he just ups and leaves; he can do this for hours (and hours and hours and ).
January 19th, 2008 at 6:36 pmMy two cents:
The TP thread is about Romney’s lack of respect for the media and the video (apparently since I can’t see it with my dial-up) demonstrates Romney ignoring the reporter, a form of disrespect for the media. The TP headline is a truth in that it stems from the talk with Leno, although it is a very poor choice for a headline given the rest of what TP presents.
Second, I find the posts by Bartlebee be a hundred times more disrespectful. He made a legitimate point to be considered, but who would want to consider it when it is couched in such arrogant, demeaning, tyranical, unappealing, disrespectful packaging?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:36 pmWhat happened Bart, things getting too tough for you?
Comment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 6:34 pm
He’s busting out the dictionary.
Once he starts posting definitions I’m out of here.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:36 pmOnce he starts posting definitions I’m out of here.
Comment by dim wit — January 19, 2008 @ 6:36 pm
where’s he going to find “lost his cool”? The Supreme Court?
Bwahahahaha!
January 19th, 2008 at 6:44 pmAfter reading Bartlebee’s tirades here and on the “atheism is a religion” thread, I understand why Bartlebee believes in God. It’s because he thinks he IS God.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:45 pmHe’s lurking, afraid to post. Watch, as soon as we stop he’ll be here to have the last say. But until he addresses the Worfeus issue he is disseminating.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:47 pmI may be paraoid but that don’t mean they’re not after me…..
Comment by Fred
“It’s not paranoia when they really are after you….”
(From the dust jacket of the DVD “Enemy of the State”
January 19th, 2008 at 6:49 pmGood movie, starring Gene Hackman and Will Smith.)
It’s because he thinks he IS God.
Comment by PatrioticLiberalChristian — January 19, 2008 @ 6:45 pm
That’s why he’s so insulted by people who don’t believe in God and takes it personally. Still it doesn’t explain why he thinks the lack of belief is a belief system. His dictionary speaks to him and tells him that. So God believes in the dictionary more than the bible, except for the Oxford dictionary which disagrees with him, he thinks that’s the Koran of dictionaries.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:49 pmgee….so hard
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:47 pm
Bart, pay attention. Worfeus, what happened to him and why did people pile on him when he wasn’t supposed to be a troll and he wasn’t Bartlebee?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:50 pmBart why are you such a coward that doesn’t answer any questions just keeps advancing the same bogus propositions?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:51 pmWow.
Who the hell knew the name Worfeus would shut Bartlebee up in a heartbeat?
Oh well, I’ve got dinner reservations. I’m gone.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:52 pmYou guys say TP was praising the republican presidential candiate by dedicating an entire thread to praising his composure….. and you’re really smart…….. but…….
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:49 pm
He’s really gonna try to pull it off…
This is like watching Evel Knievel attempting to jump the fountain at Caesars Palace…
Hey justasking, got any of that popcorn left?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:57 pmso bart, you really think that everyone that has been responding to you is just one person?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:57 pmI disagreed with you and used this name on the atheism debate, go look it up. And I argued with you on the Don Imus debate when you were Worfeus, look it up. You think I’m not who I say are are you just lying? Isn’t always the biggest liar who accuses other of lying?
January 19th, 2008 at 6:58 pmAnd the ridiculous LIE that TP meant to PRAISE ROMNEY, is laughable.
:D
It certainly isn’t plausible.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:55 pm
what part of your fevered brain came up with that? show us where that was offered, please. Or accept your loss and get out. You really should adjust to your losing status, it’s going to happen more and more often. You’ve been ridiculed across the entire lib blogoshere for your extremist and idiotic views on both atheism and “cool”, give it up already.
January 19th, 2008 at 6:58 pmThis is like watching Evel Knievel attempting to jump the fountain at Caesars Palace…
Hey justasking, got any of that popcorn left?
Comment by ralph the wonder llama
in slow motion
January 19th, 2008 at 6:59 pmIt would take more than a half wit like you dim wit, to shut me up.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:54 pm
sadly, that’s all too true. Nobody can contain the ego that is Bartlebee, the jester of all jesters.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:00 pmYou don’t get to ask me questions Dim Wit.
I only answer questions from honest folk.
Scum like you need not apply.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:56 pm
Awesome! Bart is attempting some mid-air rhetorical gymnastics and AT THE SAME TIME takes evasive manuevers to avoid Shayne’s troublesome question.
This is a virtuoso performance we’re witnessing, folks.
justasking, are you taking notes? THIS is how trolling is done.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:00 pmIsn’t always the biggest liar who accuses other of lying?
Comment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 6:58 pm
usually that happens in GOP-ville. Bart is borrowing from the lowest of the lowlifes. What does that say about him?
January 19th, 2008 at 7:01 pmBart you couldn’t find your own a$$ with both hands. How are you going to hand somebody else there’s? Only in your delusional mind. So why did you stop using the name Worfeus, because it was banned or because you were tired of getting piled on. Why don’t you switch names again and see how long it takes for the piling on to begin. And how long will it take you to realize it is your attitude that gets you piled on not your name.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:01 pmStraight from the atheism debate. And HE never lets it go.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 6:50 pm
What attheism debate? All I can remeber is some pretenuous and long winded nonsense that everyone else was politely hoping would just go away
January 19th, 2008 at 7:02 pmBecause for you Dim Wits, its not about whether Bartlebee was right or wrong.
For you, it is and always has been, about Bartlebee.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:01 pm
Not one, bart. just the facts. You have never stopped your barrage of ad hominem personal attacks, filth, cursing and lies. Your projection is becoming nearly professional.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:04 pmBecause for you Dim Wits, its not about whether Bartlebee was right or wrong.
For you, it is and always has been, about Bartlebee.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:01 pm
AND HE ADDS A MEGLOMANIACAL TWIST! CAN YOU BELIEVE THE AUDACITY! AND THE CROWD GOES WILD!
January 19th, 2008 at 7:05 pmot one iota of evidence to prove Bartlebee is wrong, other than the RIDICULOUS notion that TP wrote this article to “praise†Mitt Romney, lol.
You guys are a joke. Especially you Shayne. You’re so obvious, its laughable.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:04 pm
Romney clearly loses his cool 14 seconds in and takes nearly 10 seconds to recover. Your sick need to be right blinds you to the truth, as usual.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:05 pmAnd Mittens just pegged the LyingBastardOMeter again!
January 19th, 2008 at 7:05 pm#8 bartlebee – i agree – i don’t know what the big fuss was all about – romney seemed pretty calm and collected
January 19th, 2008 at 7:06 pmhey I thought I was Shayne…..
January 19th, 2008 at 7:06 pmWhat attheism debate? All I can remeber is some pretenuous and long winded nonsense that everyone else was politely hoping would just go away
Comment by dbadass — January 19, 2008 @ 7:02 pm
Oh great db, now he’s going to go drag out his dictionary again, yeesh.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:06 pmAnd so far, its Bartlebee 1, ClownCollege Grads, ZERO.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:05 pm
Put that on your Wall of Shame, bart. Declaring yourself the winner is a sure sign of losing, both the battle and your mind.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:06 pmBARTLEBEE IS THE –DARE I SAY IT — YES, HE’S THE MUHAMMED ALI OF TROLLDOM!
January 19th, 2008 at 7:06 pmRomney clearly loses his cool 14 seconds in and takes nearly 10 seconds to recover. Your sick need to be right blinds you to the truth, as usual.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:07 pmAnd so far, its Bartlebee 1, ClownCollege Grads, ZERO.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:05 pm
The nutjob doesn’t even know who the players are and now he’s keeping score. Whatever Bart, whatever.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:09 pm“Really? A minute ago you were claiming TP meant to PRAISE him for retaining his cool, lol.”
prove that, you liar. i never said any such thing. You’re a lying pig who will do and say anything to prevent the deserved embarrassment that you’re feeling.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:09 pmI thought he lost his composure but he was really cool about it……
January 19th, 2008 at 7:10 pmWas it the SMILING?
Is that what passes for “losing his cool†with a progressive now?
There is no smiling at 14 seconds, there is obvious anger and sweating. You are blinded by your ego.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:10 pmBecause its OBVIOUS this article is wrong, and that Mitt Romney did NOT lose his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:05 pm
And it’s obvious the article doesn’t say he does even though many of feel he does. Do you have a point other than you get paid to drive up the number of posts?
January 19th, 2008 at 7:10 pmA minute ago you were claiming TP meant to PRAISE him for retaining his cool, lol.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:07 pm
Uh, oh… the judges are conferring… it looks like Bart’s attempted rehtoric reversal has been disallowed. They rule that Lefty Patriot never argued that TP meant to praise Romney, as Bart claims, rather ridiculously.
Since the competition uses Bart’s own rules, and under those rules this infraction is technically a LIE, Bartlebee has been disqualified.
I’m betting he’ll lose all those endorsement deals, too.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:11 pmRomney is POLITE, and SOFTSPOKEN.
Anyone wanting to side with Lefty Idiot on this feel free to do so, and consign yourself to the realm of the hopeless LIAR.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:09 pm
You’re no judge of people if Romney can fool you that easily. You’re just like the fools and cultists that will vote for him if you buy his act. I didn’t think you were quite tht stupid, but you’ve proven me wrong. You are as gullible as any Romney voter.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:11 pmSince the competition uses Bart’s own rules, and under those rules this infraction is technically a LIE, Bartlebee has been disqualified.
I’m betting he’ll lose all those endorsement deals, too.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 7:11 pm
On behalf of the entire team, I accept the medal, and wish to share it among the sane here. Which is everybody except…
January 19th, 2008 at 7:14 pmIs it possible to grit your teeth and smile at the same time? Yes it is.
Is it possible to be a Romney supporter and a progressive at the same time. No it isn’t.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:14 pmSo Bart loses on two fronts.
1) TP says Romney lost his cool. WRONG
2) Romney didn’t lose his cool. WRONG
January 19th, 2008 at 7:15 pmI’m betting he’ll lose all those endorsement deals, too.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 7:11 pm
That’s good in a way, now he can stop taking all those steroids. Because if he doesn’t have “roid rage” who does?
January 19th, 2008 at 7:17 pmComment by BARTLEBEE
I’m sorry what was the question?
January 19th, 2008 at 7:18 pmSo either you agreed with Ralph the wonder liar that TP was posting the article to PRAISE Mitt, or you were PURPOSEFULLY LYING, just to side with him against me.
Which is it?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:16 pm
Now who’s the irony-impaired? Now who needs the dictionary definition of sarcasm? Now who’s the most obtuse egomaniac on TP?
Why, Bartlebee, of course.
What an idiot.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:19 pmAnd so is your pal RALPH?
Your pal RALPHS wrong too? Because he said it too dipshit.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:17 pm
Nobody has “pals” here Bart, this isn’t a social networking site. Focus, OK!
January 19th, 2008 at 7:19 pmI’m sorry what was the question?
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 7:18 pm
Hey Fred, for a newbie around here you are quite masterful.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:20 pmSo Waynes wrong too?
And so is Moderation?
And so is lyonya ?
And so is your pal RALPH?
Your pal RALPHS wrong too? Because he said it too dipshit.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
How can anyone be wrong bart…..it’s a discussion group….it’s about opinions….
January 19th, 2008 at 7:20 pmYour pal RALPHS wrong too? Because he said it too dipshit.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:17 pm
Actually, as I stated early on, everybody’s entitled to his or her own opinion. The problem here is that you won’t allow that. The issue isn’t Romney, you have made the issue Bartlebee and his reprehensible, juvenile, hateful behavior. I think Romney lost his cool, others don’t. TP uses the video to highlight the lack of respect Romney and his camp have for the press. Everybody agrees on that. But you have to have a black-and-white scenario to wrap your teeny little brain around. How sad.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:22 pmSo you’re clearly lying that he does.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:22 pm
As I said, you don’t possess my deeper understanding of human behavior or my powers of observation. Live with it.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:23 pmYou’re like dumb, dumber and dumberer.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:19 pm
You really don’t have much of a knack for the obvious do you Bart? We’re not here because of Romney, who really gives a sh*t. We’re here to watch go nuts, it’s like a very bad crash but you just can’t look away. People try to help you get out of the car, like Fred did, and you kick them in the teeth. Now we’re just watching the fireworks.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:23 pmI’m sorry what was the question?
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 7:18 pm
Hey Fred, for a newbie around here you are quite masterful.
Comment by Shayne
We have raised 3 kids…..be on your toes or else….
January 19th, 2008 at 7:23 pmYou’re like dumb, dumber and dumberer.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:19 pm
That leaves dumbest just for you, bart.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:24 pmWell, I’ve had my entertainment for the time being. Bart, you’re outgunned, outclassed, outwitted and just plain out of your head. Enjoy the hair shirt you’re weaving.
Rube.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:26 pmComment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 7:23 pm
Thanks for admitting it Dim Wit.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
hey, I thought I was dim wit……now wait….damn..
January 19th, 2008 at 7:28 pmSo I’m Dim Wit, that’s what you think? Who else am I Bart, enlighten me. But you still haven’t told us why you stopped being Worfeus.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:28 pmUm… Bart? Yeah, Lefty and Shayne disagree with my assessment of the video.
Unlike you, I don’t have a problem with them disagreeing with me. I respect their opinion, can see why they think that, and am comfortable thinking something different.
The thing with you is that you don’t even allow for anyone else’s opinion.
And obviously, you have some deficiency in reading comprehension, too, as demonstrated in your ridiculous interpretation of that exchange between me and Lefty.
Really, dude. Seek some help.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:28 pmYour version of “the truth” means very little to any body, Bart. That’s what happens when you’re delusional, duh.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:29 pmSo folks, Shayne the liar, just admitted that the TRUTH is of little concern
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:26 pm
Wait just a cotton-pickin’ minute — if Shayne is a LIAR, as Bart claims, then she couldn’t be telling the TRUTH as he also claims.
Looks like Bart, by his own admission, is a LIAR.
Heeheehee.. this is fun.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:31 pmComment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 7:28 pm
The pleasure of disagreeing with you Ralph is all mine.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:31 pmhey bart…no one has cared one little bit about the title or content of the thread for quite a while now….well over an hour. I have to agree with the following. You had me fooled for a day or two but this pretty well sums this thread for me too.
You really don’t have much of a knack for the obvious do you Bart? We’re not here because of Romney, who really gives a sh*t. We’re here to watch go nuts, it’s like a very bad crash but you just can’t look away. People try to help you get out of the car, like Fred did, and you kick them in the teeth. Now we’re just watching the fireworks.
Comment by Shayne
January 19th, 2008 at 7:32 pmPlaying bop Pavlov’s dogs on the nose isn’t fun when the dog is all distracted chasing his own tail. Could you try a little harder Bart, you’re starting to bore me.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:34 pmNo dickwad, you seek some help.
You’re the lamebrain thats been in here arguing with me about something you said yourself, dumbass.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:30 pm
(First response contemplated by Ralph:)
No, you!
(Second response contemplated and ultimately chosen by ralph:)
No, sad one, what I have been arguing about (in between simply making fun of you) is your misinterpretation of what I said. Whether that misinterpretation is willful or just the predictable result of limited brain function is up for debate.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:35 pmAnd Shayne, Ralph, Dim Wit, Dbaddass, Lefty Idiot, are all 2 or 3 guys who have been following Bartlebee from thread to thread, to start trouble.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:33 pm
Delusions of grandeur are a symptom of several mental illnesses as is paranoia. It’s not so much fun when it feels like we’re arguing with the mentally ill. You’re spoiling ALL the fun Bart.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:36 pmBy my calculations, the score stands thusly:
Crude indults:
BART 2,756
Everyone else 42
Straw men:
BART 9
Everyone else: 0
Yep. looks like Bart wins, all right.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:38 pmYou know Bart when you were Worfeus you had a couple of supporters. But since you’ve switched names you’re on your own. Do you think it’s the escalation of your bizarre behavior? No you probably don’t but the rest of us do.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:39 pmIt’s such a drag when the entire world is crazy and you’re the only sane one…..
January 19th, 2008 at 7:40 pmWe all know why you’re here.
To start shit with me.
Just like you do in EVERY thread you find me in.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:37 pm
So, tell me, Bart, if I could find a single thread in which I did NOT “start shit with you” and post a link, that would make you a LIAR, am I right?
January 19th, 2008 at 7:40 pmCompared to other exchanges in which I’ve seen Mitt participate, he “lost his cool”. It’s plain as a pikestaff. Calling me a liar, fool, moron, or any other undeserved name, won’t change my opinion.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:41 pmWell, I can’t speak for everyone but for myself, I’m getting kinda tired of getting my ass kicked by bart so I’m probably going to run for now…..
this is dim witted shayne…..fred…maybe a few others mixed in…signin off for now. peace
January 19th, 2008 at 7:42 pmMitt is in a constant struggle to maintain his “cool”.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:44 pmHe is a spoiled plasticine construct who has perfect hair and struggles for perfect composure.
He is false and fabricated man who has no inner foundation of spiritual strength.
And you clowns attacked me, you for no apparent reason other than your desire to attack me, as you yourself agreed with me.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:47 pm
“For no apparent reason”?
All evidence to the contrary, I guess:
The objection I have with you is your troll-like tantrum, your infantile insults and your refusal to treat language as if it means something.
Nothing in the TP copy for this thread says the Romney lost his cool, but you continue to insist that it does. You even copied-and-pasted it as if it supported your position. That’s a little weird.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 5:56 pm
January 19th, 2008 at 7:52 pmBart you are getting plain tiresome. I am going to put dinner on the table for my family. Just want you to know I’ve never seen you win an argument yet. Just embarrass yourself. But you keep spinning your victories, I’m sure your family is impressed by your brilliance.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:53 pmAnd you clowns attacked me, you for no apparent reason other than your desire to attack me, as you yourself agreed with me.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:47 pm
“For no apparent reason�
More evidence to the contrary:
If this isn’t a PERSONAL attack on me, why didn’t you guys jump on Wayne? Or Ralph? Or lyonya? Or Moderation?
Or any of the others who agreed that Romney clearly was composed and that the headline of the article was misleading?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:55 pm
Possibly because none of the others who agreed with you called those who had differing views “LIARSâ€. Not to mention “Scumbagâ€, “pisspot†or “dirty lying piece of shitâ€.
Just a thought.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 5:59 pm
January 19th, 2008 at 7:54 pmBart, by your own standards, you are every bit as much a LIAR as those you accuse of the offense. Most would say more so.
You’re a LIAR.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:56 pmOne of the amazing things about soap operas is (or was) that you could go on vacation, hell you could go away to school, and when you got back it would only take a day to pick up the plot, because nothing had really changed.
That’s how I feel about this kind of thread. I went grocery shopping, came back and checked the thread, then took a nap and came back and checked the thread and . . . maybe I’ll go fix dinner, decant this bottle of port and come back and check the thread.
Because nothing will have changed.
January 19th, 2008 at 7:59 pmMitt looks and sounds angry and “whiny”. He grits his teeth. His voice quavers and shows obvious strain. True, he didn’t yell, or shout obscenities, but, compared to other exchanges I’ve seen, he is: “flummoxed”, “flustered” and “discomforted”. He looks like he would rather be anywhere else.
That, to me, is “losing one’s cool”.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:02 pmThese c0cksuckers want trouble, they came to the right place
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 8:01 pm
What is this a gay bathhouse? Totally ridiculous and not even remotely tough guyish
January 19th, 2008 at 8:07 pmWell thanks Gummitch.
Unfortunately if that is an insinuation that I should just give up, even though I am clearly correct, sorry.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 8:01 pm
No, although I’m curious why you think it matters and what you think you’re proving.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:09 pmNothing in the TP copy for this thread says the Romney lost his cool, but you continue to insist that it does. You even copied-and-pasted it as if it supported your position. That’s a little weird.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 5:56 pm
See?
Ralph the Wonder Liar here actually is taking the position that TP meant to PRAISE Romney.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 7:56 pm
Need I point out AGAIN how the piece you cut-and-pasted does not say what you claim it says?
Yes, apparently I need.
Of course, explaining WHY it doesn’t say what you claim it does would be a waste of time and bandwidth, since if your reading comprehension is of such a level that you could misconstrue what I said as badly as you did the first time, there’s little hope of any further progress.
And then there’s your well-known obstinancy to factor in, too.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:15 pmI think I have had to tell you this before. It is spelled exactly as it sounds. dbadass. By the way you appear to be insane
January 19th, 2008 at 8:18 pmAt first I didn’t really think you were that lame ass bald guy grilling those steaks but I guess I was mistaken
January 19th, 2008 at 8:24 pmDumbass.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 8:21 pm
ah bartlebee, still lying, still crazy, after all these hours. dbadass is not to be confused with dumbass, although dumbass is a perfectly good translation of bartlebee. your paranoia is increasing, so should your meds. your doctor is doing a piss-poor job of controlling your psychosis. you can’t even see that Romney loses his cool 14 seconds into the video, loses his smile, tightens his voice, breaks into a sweat, then recovers. Too bad you’re so confused and psycho that you can’t see that, it would save you a lot of embarrassment.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:26 pmBart, I never said anything about what TP IMPLIED.
I said “Nothing in the TP copy for this thread says the Romney lost his cool”.
Show me where it says that Romney lost his cool.
You can’t.
All you have are your inferences about what the text meant. An inference is subjective. Understand now?
Y’know, Bart, I’m beginning to think that you’re not dishonest. I’m beginning to think that the problem is you’re not too bright. But clearly, it’s got to be one or the other.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:28 pmHe caught Romney in an obvious lie which is why he got upset.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 4:45 pm
How do we know he was upset? Because he looked, and sounded, upset. For a professional politician that counts as “losing his cool” in my book.
BTW, I have done/said foolish things on many occasions. This is not one of them. And? I gave up lying over fifty years ago.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:34 pmAnd then sit here arguing with me for hours saying the article doesn’t say that???
What kind of drugs are you on?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 8:30 pm
Maybe because the article DOESN’T say that, but the headline leads to that conclusion. Which is why I also said, in the post you copy so admiringly, Now, to be fair, the article leads up to the video with these words: “A look at what Romney considers “respect†for the press:”
You keep forgetting to copy-and-paste that part, don’t you?
In other words, in the same post that you think contradicts what I’ve said later, I point out that the text does not say that Romney “lost his cool”. My post is consistent and logical, but you apparently have a difficult time with complex thought. I see that now, and I feel sorry for you.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:46 pmDid I break your concentration?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 8:44 pm
talking to yourself, now, nutcase? look out, they’ll be coming after you. you’ve utterly lost it, like Romney. too perfect. like him, you’re a liar and possess little self-control.
January 19th, 2008 at 8:48 pmBart, I’ve already pinted out (in #389, above) how you have selectively cut-and-pasted pieces of my posts in a desperate effort to salvage any semblance of what once might have been a reputation. I pointed out how the post that you try to present as evidence that I later contradicted in fact contains the “however” that you desperately need it not to contain. (Only I didn’t use “however” — I used “Now, to be fair” instead).
I really don’t have anything to prove to anyone who’s been following this thread; you’ve established your character pretty solidly by now.
I think I’ll sit back now and watch you talk to yourself, like always do when your Bartlebee threads are abandoned by all other posters. I always enjoy the strings of six or eight consecutive Bartlebee posts, all saying roughly the same thing, over and over. It’s actually kind of impressive in its own way. You’re not an idiot savant, by the way, are you?
January 19th, 2008 at 9:00 pmBart, this has been going on for almost 6 hours…..I have been to dinner and came back and you are still going…
Listen to me bart. Just turn the computer off for the evening…nothing goin on here that can’t wait till tommorrow….please.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:01 pmThe only thing “won” today is contempt. Well deserved contempt.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:01 pmNo, although I’m curious why you think it matters and what you think you’re proving.
Comment by gummitch — January 19, 2008 @ 8:09 pm
Ooh I know one thing, even if you win the rat race you’re still a rat.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:03 pmHow “BUSTED†can one guy be?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:00 pm
Not as “busted” as you, you poor sap. you’ve set the standard for “busted”. You’re becoming famous throughout the blogosphere for your insane rants and foolish contrivances. People across the country are snickering at you, even now, as you blather on helplessly, creating persecution where there is only mockery, and spotlighting yourself as a target for scorn. Congratulations, you’re the Clown Prince, the graduate from the Clown College you like to assign your betters to. You’re a Joke. A sad, sick, twisted Joke.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:07 pmCan you explain why you were arguing with me, trying to play semantical games when you yourself came in here believing the article clearly implied Romney lost control?
Can you explain that mr holier than Bartlebee?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:07 pm
bart, I already showed everybody that you were wrong on both points. That’s why there’s nobody left, because you’ve been defeated, destroyed, humiliated and PWN3D.
But thanks for playing, and losing.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:09 pmHey Bart, you’re #1, you’re #1. Attaboy, you won, you get first place, woohoo. You showed us, yep you’re the man. Believe me the next time I consider having a discussion with you I’ll remember not to.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:12 pmIn ONE BREATH, you’re arguing with me that the article does not imply that Romney lost his cool.
But four hours earlier you declared that the article was wrong for implying Romney lost his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:05 pm
I think I’ve located the problem.
You have somehow equated “IMPLY” with “STATE”. You keep claiming that I argued that “the article does not IMPLY that Romney lost his cool” (emphasis mine).
I have never made such an argument. Perhaps you misunderstood that I was talking about the text of the article and what it expilcitly SAID, not what it implied.
Please try to keep these two concepts seperate in your future rantings. Thank you.
Now don’t let me interrupt; continue your monologue. As I write this, the best you’ve done so far is five comments in a row. I know you can do better.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:23 pmBecause now everyone reading this, sees what FAKE you really are.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Sure Bart everybody reading here thinks Ralph’s the problem. Glad you got it all figured out.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:24 pmSure Bart everybody reading here thinks Ralph’s the problem. Glad you got it all figured out.
Comment by Shayne — January 19, 2008 @ 9:24 pm
Quiet, Shayne. You’re a minion!
January 19th, 2008 at 9:33 pmBart, have you written to TP to complain? Seriously if you believe this strongly then surely you have taken action. I hope you’re not just the type to talk about it and do nothing. I’m sure they will welcome your opinion.
While you are at it I think you should complain about the abuse you have received here….especially since it is so well documented.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:35 pmCome on, gum, have a little respect. How’s Bart ever gonna get to double figures in consecutive posts if we keep interrupting him?
January 19th, 2008 at 9:36 pmI mean what is it that you so called progressives think is wrong with what I orignally said, that warranted the 6 hour attack on me by so many of you?
I’m waiting.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
It’s just me bart….I’m the only one here. I’m the only one that’s been here all along.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:44 pmust because Fred(DimWit) and Ralph decided to change their tunes and start attacking me?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:42 pm
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!
bart’s a loser! again!
he’s on a roll, he’s got a streak going!
LOSER!!!
January 19th, 2008 at 9:46 pmTell us what exactly about my saying the article is wrong for implying that Romney lost his cool, is wrong???
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:35 pm
Okay, okay, Bart, since everyone else keeps interrupting you too, I’ll tell you.
Nothing is wrong with your saying the article is wrong for implying that Romney lost his cool.
You have every right to say that, and I agree with you on that.
But you are wrong when you claim that the article said that Romney lost his cool. It didn’t say that. It implied it. If you can’t understand the difference between those two concepts, if that is mere “word games” to you, then I’m afraid I can’t help you any further. This saddens me, because you do need help.
Oh, and you are wrong when you said in this thread that various people who disagreed with you are liars and worse.
You were also wrong when you claimed that the reason I’m here is “To start shit with me. Just like you do in EVERY thread you find me in.” But then, you know that, don’t you?
January 19th, 2008 at 9:46 pmralph, the reasonable people here who have disagreed with each other have done so in good faith, and the world has kept on turning. bart is the only one who insists that his opinions be adopted by the group. bart is a fascist, and a lousy excuse for a liberal. he is also a troll, and no soubt will be treated like one henceforth. this is his own fault. all I can suggest at this juncture is what we all know is best for trolls: ignore him.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:49 pmFACT: Bartlebee ios wrong about several thing but has his mind made up.
FACT: No amount of logic, structured argument or evidence can change that one tiny bit.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:50 pmnotice that bart will never understand the subtleties of good discourse; with him, it’s “my way or the highway”, like another mewling little fascist we all know too well.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:51 pmnotice how bart will lower himself even further into the muck of his twisted id to make even more vicious personal attacks, on mothers, even, all the while supported only by other trolls. this indicates the depths of igniminy to which he has fallen in his vain attempt to shape the dialogue to suit his own sick needs, his delusion of adequacy.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:53 pmI’m losing you, Bartlebee, hold on while I switch trees…
There, that’s better…
What were you saying?
Romney has quietly proposed, even politely and repeatedly smiling?
January 19th, 2008 at 9:55 pm“It implied itâ€.
Didn’t BART say that hours ago?
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 9:49 pm
(sigh) another one…
No. Bart says that the article (headline, really) implied it, but he will never admit that it doesn’t actually SAY that Romney lost his cool. When challenged, he cannot quote a specific line that says “Romney lost his cool”. All he can do is copy-and-paste the whole article and hope that his claim of implication will snow people who aren’t paying close attention.
Do YOU think there is a difference between “implied” and “stated”?
January 19th, 2008 at 9:55 pmWow, I gotta tell you guys that I am 56 years old and I have never seen anything like this….
this just shows the miserable state of our health care system…..seriously poor bart needs to be monitored and he is not getting the care he needs.
This has been funny, annoying and finally just sad and a little sick. Why doesn’t someone care enough about bart to take care of him? So much for the republicans theory that family members should take care of these folks……someone has dropped the ball. Seriously.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:56 pmnotice that bart will never understand the subtleties of good discourse; with him, it’s “my way or the highwayâ€, like another mewling little fascist we all know too well.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — January 19, 2008 @ 9:51 pm
Notice? Notice?? it’s not like it’s a subtle feature of his persona that he’ll never understand the subtleties of good discourse. It’s actually kind of his defining characteristic.
But he is entertaining in his own way.
January 19th, 2008 at 9:57 pmI didn’t say anything bad about his mom. I said her “clients†were quite satisfied.
:|
Are you “implying†you can discern my meaning from that?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:56 pm
Well, Bart, I would never claim that you SAID anything derogatory toward anyone’s mother with that statement. I would, rather, say that it was a clumsy attempt at playground insults.
But, given your stated understanding of the rules of discourse, by your own standards, you could be accused of a pretty vile personal insult. Am I right?
January 19th, 2008 at 10:01 pmDo YOU think there is a difference between “implied†and “stated�
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 9:55 pm
You’re like that wonderful llama in Dr. Doolittle. The push-me-pull-you-llama that never could decide which way to go.
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 9:59 pm
So does that mean you can’t answer the question?
Do YOU think there is a difference between “implied†and “stated�
January 19th, 2008 at 10:01 pmNot that I want to interrupt or anything, but McCain is being projected as the wiener in South Carolina, besting Huckleberry by 3-5%. Romney and Thompson are wrasslin’ for third.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:02 pmbut he will never admit that it doesn’t actually SAY that Romney lost his cool.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 9:55 pm
No you lying twit, I admitted it the minute I said implied.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:58 pm
Oh, okay. I must have missed that. Then you essentially admit that you CANNOT show where the article said “Romney lost his cool”.
If you’d just come out and said that six hours ago, we could have spared ourselves all this entertainment.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:04 pmAll I said was that it was wrong to make that claim, when its clear that Romney didn’t lose his cool.
And not one of you morons can denounce that
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 10:02 pm
WRONG asswipe. I agreed with you that the headline was wrong to IMPLY that Romney lost his cool.
Fact: Bartlebee said “not one of you morons (supposedly referring to those who “attack” him) can denounce that
Fact: BARTLEBEE IS WRONG
AGAIN.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:08 pmAsk a question if “implied†and “stated†are the same?
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 10:06 pm
Seriously, assbreath, no one is interested in your joining the game.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:09 pmcan I buy an exclaimation mark?
January 19th, 2008 at 10:11 pmYes, Ralph. There’s a difference.
What will your other angle be?
Ask a question if “implied†and “stated†are the same?
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 10:06 pm
No “other angle”. Your earlier post made it sound like you, too, believed that a headline that implied something was the same as a headline that stated something. It just seemed an odd thing to defend.
Although I see Bart’s also given up that position now.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:11 pmseriously, a few drinks and this is starting to be fun again……wtf?
January 19th, 2008 at 10:12 pmheh, I have seven or eight people here…we were going to play some music but they got to looking over my shoulder and we started scrolling up so everyone could catch up…..bart…..you’re a hit!!!!!!!!!
January 19th, 2008 at 10:14 pmOh so people can’t be on my side now?
6 or 7 people against ONE guys not enough for you?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 10:12 pm
The troll is looking to be a minion, Bart. Are you that desperate?
Have you ever considered the possibility that people pile on you because of your behavior? I mean, instead of there being some kind of conspiracy, or a convention of sock puppets?
January 19th, 2008 at 10:16 pmSo much for the republicans theory that family members should take care of these folks……someone has dropped the ball. Seriously.
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 9:56 pm
My guess is that he drove his family away long ago.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:16 pmbut he will never admit that it doesn’t actually SAY that Romney lost his cool.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 9:55 pm
No you lying twit, I admitted it the minute I said implied.
Here, I’ll do it again. The article doesn’t come out and say the WORDS, (something I’ve already said if you scroll up numbnuts), but it CLEARLY IMPLIES IT.
There is NO DIFFERENCE, other than the MEANING is IMPLIED instead of spelled out.
And in my examples, was there any difference of my stating those things?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 9:58 pm
Here’s an interesting post.
Bartlebee says he admitted that the article doesn’t say Romney lost his cool “the minute (he) said it implied it”.
That, to me, says that the two are not the same thing. If when one uses one term it automatically cancels out the other, then they cannot be the same thing, right?
But then a coule lines later, he says, “There is NO DIFFERENCE”. kind of a contradiction. Oh, but then he follows with, “other than the MEANING is IMPLIED instead of spelled out.”
To me, and I think most of the people here, that is a pretty big difference. Not to Bart, apparently.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:17 pmTo me, and I think most of the people here, that is a pretty big difference. Not to Bart, apparently.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 10:17 pm
Well, one must remember we’re dealing with someone who engages in vile, personal, attacks against any who dare hold a different opinion.
Hey! Doesn’t that sound like a troll?
January 19th, 2008 at 10:20 pmconclusion here…
he’s either insane or he’s driving up the post count for whatever reason…….
couple of bowls and a few more drinks and we will have an update…..
starting a pool…
January 19th, 2008 at 10:20 pmyou spent 6 hours arguing with me that the article never implied it,
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 10:11 pm
You are WRONG.
I, unlike you, use words with some precision, and “implied” means something different than “stated”. I have never said the article didn’t imply your contention. I said IT DID NOT SPELL IT OUT, as you yourself admit.
So it comes down to this: I believe that there is a difference between something that is implied and something that is spelled out. You do not.
It’s that simple.
Well, you also believe in personal insults as a means to prove you’re right. Does that ever work for you?
January 19th, 2008 at 10:22 pmNo, justasking, it sonds like a troll. Impolitics is right.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:24 pminfiltrator at 3 oclock
if this goes to 500 posts I win 50 bucks…..
January 19th, 2008 at 10:30 pmSure, your opinion stands. We’re not all like Bart, after all.
But your opinion isn’t supported, in my view, by the evidence. It sounds like Southern Man, O. Bigfool, Frank M… the usual suspects.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:30 pmI still think Mitt did “lose his cool”. It is most obvious in the 10 seconds, or so, after the 14 second mark.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:32 pmomg……500 is going to be easy….
if it goes to 600 I will win 500 dollars….keep it up guys….I’m not allowed to contribute to the post count….
January 19th, 2008 at 10:32 pmWorks for the TP “regularsâ€. Why shouldn’t it work for him.
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 10:25 pm
hah, the emptiest of all trolls shows up to defend the lamest of all trolls. excellent team you two make, if you’re into LOSERS. whatever thread of credibility bart may have thought he had remaining is now blown away by the complete irrelevance of justasking. you two deserve each other. Mr. P is jealous.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:32 pmthis is a non issue. I didn’t see him “lose his cool”….actually…I thought he handled himself well.but this is the only good thing I can say about him…bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzztt!!!…..Thanks For Playin……..and now Beatrice…….Tell him what he’s won!
January 19th, 2008 at 10:33 pmI still think Mitt did “lose his coolâ€. It is most obvious in the 10 seconds, or so, after the 14 second mark.
Comment by Impolitics — January 19, 2008 @ 10:32 pm
just so.
I’ve got all night son.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 10:32 pm
of course you do. no surprise there.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:33 pmheh, I have seven or eight people here…
Comment by Fred
Hi everybody!
It’s more fun when you have your own keyboard!
January 19th, 2008 at 10:35 pmThis is one thing we DO recommend you try at home!!
Well done, Bart. You’ve copied-and-pasted convenient snippets of my posts how many times in one post?
That’s gotta be a record.
Of course, since I pointed out in post 389 that you neglected to include the line from my original post where I point out that the article doesn’t say what you want it to say, each and every one of those cut-and-pastes is an instance of you taking something out of context in order to make a dishonest point.
Now, who does that as a matter of habit? Rush Limbaugh, maybe? Bill O’Reilly? Michael Savage?
And what did Bartlebee say earlier in this thread?
I don’t tolerate lies from the other side so I’m sure as hell not going to support them from this side.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 3:48 pm
Ironic.
But very entertaining.
I predict that Bartlebee will still be keeping this thread alive tomorrow morning, talking to himself.
Very entertaining indeed.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:36 pmI hope I’m #500…………..
January 19th, 2008 at 10:37 pmI don’t think he could “argue” a hooker out of her knickers with a fistful of $100.00 bills.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:37 pmYippeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
January 19th, 2008 at 10:37 pmHi everybody!
It’s more fun when you have your own keyboard!
This is one thing we DO recommend you try at home!!
Comment by Nevar
Toast the board from the gang….yay. they say our tongues are too thick to talk but this is a riot….will probably get bored soon but will be back to check the post count soon….
In the meantime…….a few Eagles tunes….a few jim morrison tunes…..love riders on the storm……we have a couple of great singers. Wish you were here…..hey that’s pink floyde…..
January 19th, 2008 at 10:41 pmbartlebee……stop talking about yourself in the third person…….
January 19th, 2008 at 10:43 pmthis is a non issue. I didn’t see him “lose his coolâ€â€¦.
Comment by mudsharks buddy — January 19, 2008 @ 10:33 pm
And another one agrees with Bartlebees position.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 10:35 pm
Um. He was quoting you.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:44 pmSo Ralph, if the article didn’t say that, then why did you say the “the headline for this article is a mistake.â€
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — January 19, 2008 @ 4:16
Why was it a mistake Ralphy?
:)
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 10:37 pm
Ah, that reading comprehension again, Bart.
Do you understand the difference between a headline and an article?
No? Didn’t think so. Understandable, given your demonstrated lack of precision, and consistent obliviousness.
In my original post (in which I agreed with you) I pointed out that the headline was misleading. I said “mistake”. I should have said misleading, because the implication was misleading. But in that same post, Bart, I continued and pointed out that the article itself did not say that Romney lost his cool.
This has been my position all along.
The headline was misleading.
The article did not say Romney lost his cool.
Knowing your limited verbal skills and cognitive ability, I can understand that you have a difficult time grasping these two seperate concepts. That’s why i’m willing to be patient and explain it over and over again.
But I can also understand how much fun it must be for someone like you to throw your feces against the wall. Heck, you’re even throwing other people’s feces against the wall.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:44 pmI hope I’m #500…………..
Comment by Nevar
alright Nevar….toast ……….hell this is more fun than a chicken fight…….oh wait…it is a chicken fight….
hey, you owe me 50 bucks……don’t think you can distract me with that shot of tequila…….
January 19th, 2008 at 10:46 pmWish you were here…..hey that’s pink floyde…..
Comment by Fred
I’m approaching a comfortable numbness myself………..
January 19th, 2008 at 10:48 pmhey ralph….the feces ref is bringin the chicks down….heh..
January 19th, 2008 at 10:48 pmgotta go for a while….be back to check on ya….peace.
My. This has been fun. But, I’m gonna go catch the last set at the local watering hole. I still think Mitt “lost his cool”.
Happy weekend everyone. Go Chargers!
January 19th, 2008 at 10:49 pmNotice Justasking, how they automatically jump on you, ignorantly and rudely, like gummitch did, just for pointing out an obvious error in their claims against me.
Its par for the course.
This almost makes me feel sorry for the neocon trolls.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 10:31 pm
I’m rude?! You’re a scream, Bart. There’s some homily about glass houses, Bart, and you really ought to look it up.
I didn’t jump on him ignorantly, but rather because of his track record. Just because he’s suddenly sucking up to you, and you’re feeling persecuted (as usual), the troll is your little pal. I guess you really are that desperate.
If you two want to wash each other’s balls, maybe you could take it to email. It’s icky.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:56 pmstupid argument.
January 19th, 2008 at 10:58 pmWhy am I a “troll†in your opinion?
Are my views neoconservative?
Remember…don’t lie…you’re above that.
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 11:00 pm
You’re a troll. Politics are irrelevant. You’re defined as a troll by your persistent behavior.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:05 pmI may be in the wrong blog.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:01 pm
You said you were leaving after you lost the last fight, so what’s stopping you? Do you feel a need to lie about everything? And take justassing with you. You can both waste somebody else’s time with your overinflated egos and empty rhetoric.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:05 pmActually, me and Justasking have disagreed with stuff in the past if memory serves me correctly.
But the fact that they agreed with me and that bothered you, is quite telling gummitch.
Quite.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:05 pm
What is telling is that you evaluate everything in terms of yourself. Everything is not about you, Bartlebee.
And, as far as I know, justasking is not a “they”. Pretty sure there’s just the one.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:07 pmAnd now I’m a troll?
HA!
Comment by justasking
No, not really, you’re just a lonely pest who’ll pester anyone just to get some attention.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:12 pmDisagreeing with “regulars� And now I’m a troll?
HA!
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 11:08 pm
and a waste of bandwidth.
When it takes 5 to best one, the one is clearly the best.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:09 pm
Not if the one loses as completely as you did. You’re just the one loser. You were bested, dusted and busted. The only person in the world that thinks you won is you. If that doesn’t tell you how screwed up you are, nothing will. You are one of the most miserable little shits walking the planet, a shallow, empty shell whose only hope is that somebody, somewhere will allow you an imaginary “win” in your imaginary game. Your supporters tonight are the John Kerry troll and the justassing loser, who never has anything useful to bring to the conversation. That speaks volumes about what a loser you are.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:15 pmAnd now I’m a troll?
HA!
Comment by justasking
No, not really, you’re just a lonely pest who’ll pester anyone just to get some attention.
Comment by Nevar
No, I lurked on a late night thread that justasking was in with one other person the other night….justaskiing is definaltly a troll…..you remember me chiming in justasking?
January 19th, 2008 at 11:17 pmIt’s better than your overinflated rhetoric and empty ego.
Comment by justasking — January 19, 2008 @ 11:10 pm
Well, you’re all alone in that opinion.
“You all are like a little reichstag, attacking anyone who won’t dance to the courts tune.”
Classic projection. I’m wondering why P doesn’t appear when you’re here. hmmm.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:18 pmNo, I lurked on a late night thread that justasking was in with one other person the other night….justaskiing is definaltly a troll…..you remember me chiming in justasking?
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 11:17 pm
justassing is a classic troublemaker and shit-flinger. he never has a point to make or anything of value to add. a juvenile delinquent of the internet.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:19 pmAnd now I’m a troll?
HA!
Comment by justasking
No, not really, you’re just a lonely pest who’ll pester anyone just to get some attention.
Comment by Nevar
Do you remember me chiming in on the thread you and one other person were in by yourselves the other night(late) justasking??? you are definatly a troll judging by what you had to say about the regulars at this site. Why would you say those things and then try to act like you are not a troll?
January 19th, 2008 at 11:19 pmAnd, as far as I know, justasking is not a “theyâ€. Pretty sure there’s just the one.
Comment by gummitch — January 19, 2008 @ 11:07 pm
Sorry gummitch, nice try though. I have no idea who justasking is, and you’re welcome to ask Faiz, I post under ONE handle and ONE handle only.
I am BARTLEBEE.
:P
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:11 pm
Bartlebee, are you high? You’re the one who referred to justasking as “they”. Go ahead, look up there a bit. Where you get this other business about your handle is a mystery.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:21 pmjustassing is a classic troublemaker and shit-flinger. he never has a point to make or anything of value to add. a juvenile delinquent of the internet.
Comment by Lefty Patriot
yeah, the whole discussion was about why he (justaskin) would never commit to anything…..
January 19th, 2008 at 11:22 pmNo, not really, you’re just a lonely pest who’ll pester anyone just to get some attention.
Comment by Nevar — January 19, 2008 @ 11:12 pm
Which is one variety of troll we get around here. Consider the former Mr Pee.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:22 pmIt boggles the mind.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:22 pm
My mind is definitely boggled. Did you fail to notice the other half of that “seven hour” thing? You know, the part you played?
January 19th, 2008 at 11:23 pmWhat about Barltebee’s original statements that the article was wrong for implying Romney lost his cool, was wrong?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:19 pm
pointless. it’s an opinion. some agree, some disagree. you’re the one who started name-calling and strutting like some imaginary king. for the record, Romney loses his cool at 14 seconds in, recovering about ten seconds later. you see it differently. that, in the real world, is the end of it. only in bartlebeeville does that become a situation of insults to our mothers, vile name-calling, and defensive whining on your part. you want a referendum, then you lose. you attack, you get counter-attacked. you lose. like George Bush, whose behavior you model so beautifully.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:24 pmthink TP owes Romney an apology on this one.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:20 pm
You think wrong. Accept it, and move on. To another blog, as you promised.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:25 pmOn my worst day, I could handle you assclowns with one keyboard tied behind my back.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:26 pm
this must not be your worst day, then, since you’re the one who’s been “handled”. LOSER.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:27 pmAs Dim Wit…yeah…I remember that.
I said yopu have no business trying to comment on Theoritical Physics because of your name.
Then you left.
Comment by justasking
nope, you was saying a lot of negative things about the regulars and you guys were joking about how funny it was that no one knew about you….heh.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:28 pmI repeat, Bartlebee, are you high?
Actually, me and Justasking have disagreed with stuff in the past if memory serves me correctly.
But the fact that they agreed with me and that bothered you, is quite telling gummitch.
Where you get the “they” “them” business is another mystery.
I repeat, also: justasking isn’t a “they”.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:29 pmWhy don’t you try and make me?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:26 pm
How unexpected, another bartlebee lie, another promise broken. And in such a mature manner! Are you trying to become the laughingstock of the whole liberal world? You’re getting close. TP regulars certainly are snickering at your childish antics and tantrums.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:29 pmDamn. Someone got knifed at the bar and the band packed up. And I still think Mitt “lost his cool”. And I still haven’t “attacked” anyone.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:31 pmAs the video clearly shows.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:28 pm
it’s unlikely that Faiz will buy your insane mutterings, either. but knock yourself out; maybe he’ll take pity on the rest of us and throw your ass out. It’s a sure way to get some cash from me.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:31 pmwhere are ya justaskin…..you talked pretty tough the other night when no one was around…..maybe I can find the thread and post a link to it…..lots of folks here probably be interested in what you have to say behind thier backs….
January 19th, 2008 at 11:36 pmWhat did Mitt say at the 57 second mark? I think it’s “bull”. Then, at the very end, he has his stooge usher away the reporter, after Mitt turned his back, rather than answer for his (Mitt’s) lie.
Not Cool!
January 19th, 2008 at 11:42 pmnope, you was saying a lot of negative things about the regulars and you guys were joking about how funny it was that no one knew about you….heh.
Comment by Fred — January 19, 2008 @ 11:28 pm
what?
Get the other guy that was typing under this name.
You’re an AWFUL relief person.
Start by not saying “you wasâ€!
That’s a DEAD GIVEAWAY.
Comment by justasking
hmm….you’re guilty as sin……I’ve had a drink or two but it’s still me….Fred. I know who you are though justaskin..
January 19th, 2008 at 11:45 pmThis story is about Mitt. No one else. Mitt “lost his cool”, evaded the question, then, had his goon prevent further discussion.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:46 pmRomney NEVER ONCE raises his voice. Never. He is FIRM, but he NEVER, EVER gets rude, upset, out of hand, or anything even remotely associated with losing ones cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
yeah, barf. romney’s a real peach of a guy……..heh…..gawd damn son…give it up.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:52 pmI think Mitt did “lose his coolâ€, though it was minor and “composure†might be a better word. However, the real question is; how many MSM outlets will run a story about Mitt getting caught in a lie?
BTW, I think the reporter should have let him finish and hit him at the end, but, I can understand how one would become frustrated having to listen to these creeps day after day. Personally, If I were forced to listen to one of these stump speeches, I would probably end up screaming obscenities.
Comment by Impolitics — January 19, 2008 @ 4:11 pm
My first post on the subject. So, Bart, where’s the lie? Where’s my disregard for the important issue that Mitt lied?
January 19th, 2008 at 11:53 pmRomney did not lose his cool, but the sad part here, is the real story, that is, Romney lied, is lost on this red herring.
This lie.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:48 pm
Romney lost his cool, and lied. they are one and the same with Romney. You are a simpleton who has no understanding of human behavior. What does he have to do, pull a gun? just because you’re too self-involved and stupid to see that Romney lost it doesn’t mean everybody here is as sad a case as you. Get over yourself; you’re weak, simple and screwed up.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:55 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:55 pm
We all know that you can’t admit a mistake. it’s a character flaw you display constantly. Too bad you’re so wrong so often; it makes you look like a nutcase.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:57 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:57 pm
there is no lie in TP’s post. Too bad for you that your reading comprehension is on a 4th-grade level.
January 19th, 2008 at 11:59 pmooooo….this is gonna be fun.
Comment by justasking
where’d ya go oclare by another name…….what’s up with that anyhow? Do you have multiple personalities or something? Everyone seems to know who you are anyway and what your are up to so why live the lie…
bart. you sure you want this troll on your side?
January 20th, 2008 at 12:00 amA lie just to defend your lie is despicable behavior, bart. You should be ashamed, but you seem to lack the capacity. a sure sign of sociopathy.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:00 amI still think he did “lose his cool”. I haven’t lied. I haven’t “attacked”. I have clearly stated my opinion and the behavior which led me to this opinion.
Some agree. Some disagree. What’s the big deal? Is it possible that Bart, like a nut-case religious fanatic, can’t accept that someone might come to a different conclusion based on the same evidence? Perhaps he just can’t live with a dissenting opinion?
January 20th, 2008 at 12:04 ambut you’ve yet to identify one.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 11:59 pm
Your first mistake is claiming that TP’s post is a lie, when it clearly is not. Your second mistake is in taking an insulting, superior, holier-than-thou tone when you are caught in your mistake. Your third mistake is arguing with those who are obviously your intellectual superiors, getting beaten badly, and continuing your “dance”, as you called it, accurately. It certainly isn’t a fight, more like a ballet with you in a pink tutu and toe shoes, falling on your ass every minute or so.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:04 amShouldn’t TP be held to the same standards of journalism as any other media outlet if they expect to be taken seriously as a media source?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:01 am
What is that, some sick joke? What media source has standards higher than TP’s? Nobody in the mainstream, no television network, certainly. You’re a fool.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:06 amdid I insinuate you lied, bart? Sorry, I meant it as a clear statement: you are a liar in accusing TP of lying in this post.
Clear enough, liar?
January 20th, 2008 at 12:09 amLet me be clear I am making no judgement on his truthfulness but as far as “losing his coolâ€, I didn’t see that.
I think TP owes Romney an apology on this one.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
What about that comment is wrong?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:01 am
Well I, and others, did see Mitt “lose his cool”. So, you are wrong to think TP owes him an apology.
BTW, I still think he said “bull” at approx the 57 second mark, though, it’s difficult to say because it wasn’t picked up by the mike. I freely admit I may be mistaken, but, I didn’t lie.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:09 amHAHAHA!
WHAT?
Comment by justasking
yea…….justaskn….getting closer now aren’t we…..you were snipping on the regulars with Sappyen who seemed to think you were knowledgable…..I got the impression that Sappyen was just gullible…..I’m looking for that thread and I will find it……..k?
January 20th, 2008 at 12:10 am“Now I’m sure TP didn’t mean to lie. ”
that’s your own line, reprinted above by you, bart. it’s an accusation of TP lying, couched in the slimy newspeak of a troll. there is the clear proof of your lie.
Wear it, liar.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:10 amClear proof of your lie, in your own words. You have been owned, bart, you’re through. keep banging that empty, liar’s head against the wall, it won’t change your lie to truth.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:12 amthats it….600 posts…..that fender twin is mine……yay.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:14 amBecause I hold TP to the same standards of journalism that I, and they, hold Fox news to, does not make me the enemy. It makes me their friend.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:11 am
your lies make you a friend of the enemy, thus an enemy. You have painted yourself into a corner, and you are stuck there. You don’t hold anyone to any standards, since nobody listens to you. You imagine that you do, but obviously, nobody does, You are fully delusional. TP corrects its mistakes; in this case, there’s nothing to correct. Although if they banned you that would be a correction.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:15 amSee folks?
Comment by BARTLEBEE
who the hell are you talking to. You act like you have an audience.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:16 amAnyone looking again at the video, and still saying it, is a liar.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:13 am
Anybody who can’t see Mitt losing his cool is an idiot, and a gullible fool. Wear it, liar. Faiz isn’t going to pay any attention to your lunacy. Write away, TP knows what an ass you are.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:16 amI suggest you go back to troll school a little while longer before you decide to take me on again.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:14 am
I think the two defeats i have dealt you are well-acknowledged among the sane posters here. Only you cling to the false notion that you have accomplished anything besides proving your lunacy. You’re like the repigs: a sore loser, and a liar.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:19 amGo back to arguing TP was trying to PRAISE Romney.
:D
I liked that one.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:17 am
Oh, another lie. Thanks, I’ll add that to the score. you keep burying yourself deeper. It’s getting hard to tell if it’s because you’re pathological or stupid.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:20 amOh, did I write a Huckabee thread for TP? That will be a surprise to everyone. Well, I never wrote a post for TP. All I’ve done is clean your clock and send you running back to your momma with your tail between your legs. Twice.
LOSER.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:23 amWhere Pete Lefty Idiot?
Where’d “Petey†go?
lol
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:21 am
Did you forget your meds again? Or are you drinking heavily, to wash away the shame of your defeats at my hand? It’s OK, you’re young, inexperienced, stupid and insane. You can’t win against someone so clearly superior.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:26 amhey bart…..with your high moral standards and everything is black and white then why is your ally justaskin…..this individual is known to be blackhearted and a troll yet you ally yourself readily just because you are alone and have no one on your side……is this how low you are willing to go?
justaskin outed at this thread:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/13/snow-maher/#comments
still looking for the other one justaskin….you know I will find it sooner or later.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:28 amYour lame attempts at changing the subject are pathetic, transparent and boring, although somewhat justifiable, since you are taking such a beating. My legs are tired from kicking the shit out of you all night. And yet you are still full of it.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:28 amHow’d this post work out for you guys?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:29 am
Ah, posting your first loss. This one wan’t embarrassing enough for you. You are the sick one. that one had the whole liberal blogosphere laughing at you. I’d visit other sites, and your insanity was the talk of the town.
I guess you value attention more than reputation. Little kids are like that.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:31 amyou accuse me of trying to change the subject.
It boggles the mind.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:30 am
Then don’t do it. I didn’t bring up your complete humiliation on the Huckabee thread, you did. Liar. I didn’t bring up “Pete”, whoever that is, you did. I never said TP praised Romney, that’s another of your lies. How many lies are you going to tell on one thread?
January 20th, 2008 at 12:35 amI think TP owes Romney an apology on this one.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:32 am
No matterhow many times you post it, you’re dead wrong. No apology is owed. learn to read English.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:36 amRomney didn’t lose his cool.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:35 am
he certainly did. As have you, hundreds of times.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:36 amHe lied. And thats the real story thats being lost with this misleading story.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:36 am
and you lied. That’s the real story of your sick, pathetic whining.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:37 amOf course, I’m sure in your family what you just stated passes for honor.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:37 am
TP made no false statement. Honor is not something you have any familiarity with, we can see.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:38 amLet me be clear I am making no judgement on his truthfulness but as far as “losing his coolâ€, I didn’t see that. Emphasis added.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
That’s the whole point. YOU don’t see it. Others do.
And for that? We are called “fools”, “liars”, and worse. You, apparently, can’t leave it at, “I disagree”. That, in my opinion, reveals a character flaw.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:42 amYou have to SHOW where I lied, and so far you’ve failed to do that.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:38 am
I have pointed out all of your lies, and documented them. Your ignoring them isn’t going to make them go away. in fact, it just adds to their weight. Your mental laziness and your deep state of denial are your only protection from your own psychoses, obviously. You even repeatedly attributed a statement to me that I never said, implied or hinted at. You’re a liar, palin and simple. Naturally you’ll deny it, that’s what makes a liar. You’ve not corrected any of your lies, just denied them, as expected from pathological types like you. You’re all alone out there in the darkness, scared of everything. get help.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:43 amYou have to SHOW where I lied, and so far you’ve failed to do that.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:38 am
You have lied every time you accused me of lying.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:45 amAnd? I sill think Mitt “lost his cool”.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:48 amJustasking is Mr. President Bart and you’re his buddy. Everybody know his best buddy is CT so are you CT Bart? I thought cLara was CT but cLara’s not around this evening is he? TP’s going to let the trolls ruin the site and everybody will be gone like they were the last time. Bart if you’re not one of them then stop acting like them.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:53 amBart thinks he’s remaining cool and then believes that he can judge Romney losing his cool. Oh the irony.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:57 amrom now on its a truth-o-cution for you.
Because thats all you deserve.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:46 am
well, we won’t be getting it from you.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:57 amBart lacks the acumen to be such a pathetic liar. you have to be smart to get away with that crap, which is why he never does.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:58 amI’ve learned so much about the progressive mind this evening.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:57 am
You’ve learned nothing, as usual. You’re too stupid to learn.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:59 amYou’re paranoid.
Comment by justasking
What happened to justasking questions?
January 20th, 2008 at 1:02 amHe did not lose his cool.
Comment by plunger — January 19, 2008 @ 3:42 pm
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:59 am
that’s good, go back 9 hours to find someone who agrees with you. so what? We already determined that the discussion was about opinion, and that the argument was about your incivility and egomania. And your ever-burgeoning collection of lies and personal attacks, of course.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:02 amYou’re paranoid.
Comment by justasking
I may be paranoid but that don’t mean you’re not a troll…..
January 20th, 2008 at 1:02 amAgreed, we are better than that, or damn well should be.
Comment by Wayne — January 19, 2008 @ 4:01 pm
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:01 am
posting wrong opinions doesn’t strengthen your position, moron. You sound more like George Bush as the night rolls on.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:03 amWhat happened to “Pete�
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 12:29 am
I’ve been hanging out at sites which are competently moderated. Obviously my decision, since I haven’t been banned. Just a self-imposed exile to locals which have fewer idiotic children.. But, when “that fanatic MARTYRBEE at TP” was mentioned, I decided to grace you with my wisdom once more.
Ask and ye shall receive, sh!t-stain. Please refrain from mentioning me again. I want nothing to do with you foolish infants.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:04 amI certainly am not a Romney fan but if thats losing your cool, then the whole world must be on Prozac. I was impressed with his poise. He made his point forcefully, but respectfully. His aide looked like he was getting hot but Romney intervened. McCain would have told the guy to F$%K off! Huckabee supporters might have lynched the dude. I was looking for a little action there and got left hanging. Someone owes me 2 minutes for my time (10 bucks)
January 20th, 2008 at 1:04 amOpinions are like a$$holes Bart, everybody has one. And many of feel that Romney lost his cool. You don’t have to like it, it just is. And justasking outed himself as Mr. P the other day, you don’t have to like that either, it’s just the way it is. You can be friends with him until he gets kicked out again. It’s your business.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:05 amAsk and ye shall receive, sh!t-stain. Please refrain from mentioning me again. I want nothing to do with you foolish infants.
Comment by pete — January 20, 2008 @ 1:04 am
there you go, justassing, you clowns are again the laughingstock of the blogosphere.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:05 amYou have to SHOW where I lied, and so far you’ve failed to do that.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
bart, you have been shown to be unreasonable as well but you didn’t accept that either…..no matter what anyone did or said…they would be wrong….period, so what is the point?
January 20th, 2008 at 1:06 amExcept for EVERYONE who came in, until Fred\Aka\DimWit stumbled in.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:05 am
And yet everybody turned on you, because of your hateful, fascist bullshit. My, my, aren’t you just the charmer.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:07 am. Bart’s point that TPs headline should change is valid.
Comment by Moderation — January 19, 2008 @ 4:18 pm
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:06 am
Are you trying to prove that you aren’t alone in being wrong? Fine, you’re not the only one who can’t see the truth.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:08 amJustasking accuses me of being paranoid and thinks Bart is being reasonable. Everybody knows what you are justasking and your time here is limited. Let’s have at it before you get booted, again.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:11 amjust keep posting what people said bart…..that is their opinion.
Your attempt to deny me my opinion is offensive. Who the hell do you think you are? you may disagree with me but no amount of childishness on your part will deny me my right to my opinion….get over yourself. Who do you think you are g bush or some other facist dictator?
January 20th, 2008 at 1:14 amI still think Mitt “lost his cool” and still haven’t “attacked” anyone. I’m always open to disagreement, yet, I won’t tolerate being called a “liar” for stating an opinion. A simple “I disagree” would suffice.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:15 amA simple “I disagree†would suffice.
Comment by Impolitics — January 20, 2008 @ 1:15 am
And, a man would apologize.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:17 amOnly you few did that. From the moment you waltzed in.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:11 am
I think the numbers are against you, nevertheless. and they turned on you long before I waltzed in, I just came in for the kill. I am the Bartlebee-killer, your own personal ass-kicker, the exposer of your lies and pathology, the righter of your wrongs. I own you, you pathetic little tic. I’ll keep you dancing all night, if I choose. Your lies and attacks are nothing to me, you are weak and transparent.
and, unfortunately, really fu(king boring.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:17 amWho ARE you?
Comment by justasking
Such a question.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:18 amYour insistence with this question piques my curiosity.
No, I’m showing that practically EVERYONE but your “hole in the head†gang agreed with me.
And they didn’t “turn†on me dickhead.
Only you few did that. From the moment you waltzed in.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
This is a lie that can be verified by simply reading back through this thread. You are the one that turned on me. You decided that I was not entitled to an opinion on this and that is what started this. You immediatly resorted to namecalling….called me a troll and then you began an 8 hour marathon poor me session……gawd what a snivellling child. Grow up or go away. You will not deny me my opinion even if you think it is wrong. I am certainly not swayed by your petty childishness…..
January 20th, 2008 at 1:19 amComment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 1:16 am
What makes you think you deserve more than 5 seconds of my time, shithead? I am done with you, you’re toilet paper on my shoe. Or dogshit. You stink. I’m wasting no more time on you.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:20 amYou will not deny me my opinion even if you think it is wrong. I am certainly not swayed by your petty childishness…..
Comment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 1:19 am
My thoughts exactly.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:22 amYou will not deny me my opinion even if you think it is wrong. I am certainly not swayed by your petty childishness…..
Comment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 1:19 am
right on the money, Fred. bart always pulls this crap; he’s got more issues than National Geographic. Small brain, small dick, that sort of thing, makes him strike out at the world through his envy and paranoia. You don’t have to take it, he’s but flyshit on your heel. he’s becoming quite infamous for it, too.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:23 amLol, the fact that you’ve spent half the night arguing with him is a pretty good indicator, sparky.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:21 am
another lie to add to the pile of bart’s weak, cheap lies. you’d think he’d put some effort in, but no, he’s too damn lazy.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:24 amShayne.
You’ve got nothing.
You’re a bore.
Comment by justasking
You are worse than bart……I think he is mentally ill. You choose to be pus
January 20th, 2008 at 1:28 amwell, I do have to take the dog out for her nightly crap. it will be just like reading bart and justassing, only not as pointless. or as stinky.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:29 amAnd I’m an idiot for wasting my time arguing to idiots like you.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:27 am
Well, you got the first part right. And I have posted no more than 5 replies to justassing’s lies. half the time? do you know the difference between the big and little hands, child? I’m off, my puppy will deposit some more of your ideas in the woods.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:32 ambart, put aside your hurt feelings for a moment. Am I allowed to have an opinion? Even if you think it’s wrong.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:33 amEveryone else agreed with me, and left when they saw the fight starting.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:31 am
everyone abandoned you, knowing full well that I would win the day. But you spin away to your heart’s content. Your constant lies and fantasies can keep you company for the rest of the night.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:33 amyou have had your say for 8 hours or more bart….if you wish to be taken seriously then you must be fair. You have to address my one simple question. Am I allowed to have an opinion that is all my own?
January 20th, 2008 at 1:38 amI’m mentally ill, for saying, and sticking to my guns, the same thing that practically ever other blogger in here said, except for you few, who ALL were part of that Month long debate in the huckabee thread, and who have followed me ever since.
Its YOU, and only you, other than gummitch, who is always arguing with me anyway, who attacked me tonight. Everyone else agreed with me, and left when they saw the fight starting.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:31 am
There you go again. I didn’t “attack” you tonight, or any other. Yet? I still disagree. I don’t know, or care, what happened a moth ago. It has nothing to do with me. However, you’ve seen fit to, repeatedly, call me a “liar”, and worse, for stating an opinion you don’t share.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:40 amI find it kind of cosmic that the longest running thread of the evening has the same tenor of the candidate the thread began upon.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:43 amYou just keep pasting something that you think supports your side of the argument but will not discuss anyone elses viewpoint on the subject….you ignore reasonable questions and just paste your bs in instead.
That is not discussion or an argument bart. That is dictating…..you are trying to be a dictator and no one is allowing it. News flash bart, you are no dictator.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:44 amAm I allowed to have an opinion? Even if you think it’s wrong.
Comment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 1:33 am
Obviously, the answer to that is “no”. Bart only accepts the opinions of those who agree with him. Everyone else is a “liar” and/or an “idiot”. It must be a horrible way to live.
It’s a pity, really, all he would need to do is say, “I disagree. Sorry for the name-calling”. But, my guess is that’s not included in his character.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:45 amI never stopped you Fred.
Like I said 8 hours ago, you’re free to have your “opinionâ€, and I’m free to refute it.
And since your “opinion†is a blatant LIE, you can bet your ass I’m going to excercise my right to refute it.
No matter how much you whine little girl.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Is this you being reasonable bart? Seriously, what do you hope to accomplish here tonight?
January 20th, 2008 at 1:47 amThanks — I tend to agree with you. I’ll raise it with the person who
wrote that. Not sure what we can do about it now. Thanks for writing
Comment by BARTLEBEE
My insurance company says the exact same words to me on the phone, Bartee, when they are trying to get rid of me.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:50 amomg, I have been drunk, been to dinner. sobered up, Played music for 2 hours and got drunk again and have sobered up again and you are still acting like obigfoot.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:51 amI just got this email from Faiz.
Faiz Shakir
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Well then you should be able to get him to join us here tonight unless you’re lying about that too.
January 20th, 2008 at 1:55 am“…and have sobered up again and you are still acting like obigfoot.”
Comment by Fred
How does he do it?
January 20th, 2008 at 1:56 amAccuse Faiz of lying because his words don’t agree with your position.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
I don’t believe he will call me any of the vile names that you have called people here tonight just because they disagree with him. Are you absolutly sure you want anyone…..let alone Faiz to see the things you have said to people here tonight? I think you will be in for a big surprise if that should happen bart. I wouldn’t count on you and him being buddies…..
January 20th, 2008 at 2:02 amSo now you’re accusing Faiz of being just as disingeneous as an INSURANCE COMPANY?
That’s low.
Comment by justasking —
Sure, Faiz is lying to me.
Accuse Faiz of lying because his words don’t agree with your position.
Comment by BARTLEBEE —
Are you two in the same room together?
January 20th, 2008 at 2:03 amI can’t speak for anyone else here but I personally think your email from Faiz is a figment of your warped imagination. I am afraid you are delusional. I got an idea. Why don’t you log in as Faiz and try to fool us…….how about that….we might go for it.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:05 amOk bart….produce faiz or depart from us for the lier that you are……lets see if you can run two windows at one time and keep it straight.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:09 amThe facts don’t matter to them. Its all about me, and attacking me. Whatever position I take, they take the opposite. Their goal is to attack me, and try and drive me out, because I clearned their clocks in a debate on atheism.
I just posted comment after comment made by practically everyone in here today, that came in before the debate started, and they all agreed with me.
Now the blog owner also agrees with me, so whats their tactic?
Why smear the blog owner of course.
Discredit his intentions. Discredit his words.
Just like the neocons do.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:59 am
I still disagree with you as I suspect the author would too. I still haven’t “attacked” or “smeared” anyone. My only “beef” with you is your insistent attacks on all who express an opinion you don’t share due to your bizarre insistence that we are all in league because of a past argument.
Also, Faiz said he “tends to agree with you” and would discuss the story with the author. Not quite justification for your behavior. I would be willing to bet that the author will make the same points I did, and, possibly Faiz will concur. That, of course, is up to him and I will respect his decision should he change the story. Or not.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:13 amJust speaking for myself, I wish justasking would come back and listen to me answer her question: “Who AM I”
January 20th, 2008 at 2:13 amI guess she’s really not that interested.
Her questions are just used as a control drama, building blocks for the wall she builds around herself.
It’s easy to lob rocks at people over the fence when you can’t see who you are assaulting.
How exactly am I supposed to “produce Faiz†dickhead?
Here is his words, exactly as he wrote them.
Thanks — I tend to agree with you. I’ll raise it with the person who wrote that. Not sure what we can do about it now. Thanks for writing
RE: ThinkProgress
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:58:03 -0500
From: “Faiz Shakirâ€
So suck it.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Well hell bart, anyone could have come up with this little bit of text and a date…..not that tough even for you….why should we believe you? Where is the return email address? I think you are out of ideas and in over your head and this is a last ditch effort to save face…..pitiful just the same…
January 20th, 2008 at 2:21 amFurthermore I still think you’re wrong…..that’s just my opinion but I have just as much chance of being right as you do you little facist pig.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:23 amgood nite and good bye bart….may you and I never cross paths again. Live is much too short to indulge the likes of you. I feel sorry for you but I can’t help you. Good luck.
I will never acknowledge your existance again after this post. You do not exist.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:34 amThey should have run this clip. Maybe Faiz will make a change?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdGUSjd3Tmo
January 20th, 2008 at 2:38 amBTW, the Youtube clip has better audio. I was mistaken about Mitt saying “bull”.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:42 amHa, Ha. I just googled “Romney loses cool”. I’ve got my reading list for a couple days.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:54 amLOL !! Fred was quoting ‘Sappyen’.
I remember that thread. HAHAHA !!
∞
January 20th, 2008 at 4:45 amAnyone who would dedicate such an absurd amount of time and energy of such an idiotic line of circlular thought clearly has no experience whatsoever in the area the rest of us understand to be the concept of cool.
The votes are in and Daryll has lost out to this bizarro
January 20th, 2008 at 9:45 amThe termâ€losing ones cool†means losing a degree of self control.
And your inbred lame attampts to paint me as crazy for “dedicating time†to the debate, is laughable, since it is you too, who are still here making arguments.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 9:56 am
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
I think you have clearly shown by example your definition
As to you second statement. If we take out the personal attack on my kin and try instead simply counting the number of posts that carry the tag which you seem inable to spell properly and compare it to the ones that end with… comment by Bartlebee, we might have an interesting dataset. I went to sleep freakshow did you?
January 20th, 2008 at 10:04 amIts YOU, and only you, other than gummitch, who is always arguing with me anyway, who attacked me tonight. Everyone else agreed with me, and left when they saw the fight starting.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 1:31 am
Just as a point of pointless correction, Bartlebee. I am not “always” arguing with you because I rarely waste the time. In fact, even last night I didn’t “argue” with you other than to suggest that your approach to Truth needs some work. It’s only in your intense paranoia that anything I said to you could be construed as an “attack”, other than my comment about you and your would-be-minion’s little lovefest.
I hope this whole thread makes you happy and that you’ve convinced yourself that you’re victorious. What it is that you’ve won is clear only to you, judging from the responses, and your ability to ignore any suggestion that you would get farther by modifying your behavior and turn those suggestions into “attacks” is your problem.
And, no, I haven’t been hanging around arguing with your for the last 12 hours or more. In that period of time I did my grocery shopping, took a nap, fixed dinner, decanted some port, drank some 1998 Riesling, had dinner, watched a movie, read a few chapters of a novel and had a great night’s sleep. Now I’m off to do the laundry. You had better get some rest so you’re prepared for the next “attack” on your Fortress of Truth.
January 20th, 2008 at 10:24 amooo
look at all the fun I missed last night!
January 20th, 2008 at 11:06 amstill a stupid argument………….he wasn’t losing his cool.He was going ballistic,ranting and raving like some kind of maniac.Didn’t anyone see him start throwing stuff at the reporter?Didn’t anyone see him frothing at the mouth?…………..non issue……………………………..almost 800 comments on this non issue………..amazing.Surely there is better topics to focus on…Like the FBI lying and hiding a report debunking Irans Nuclear capabilities….years ago.
January 20th, 2008 at 11:08 amFun? I am not so sure? Bizarre! Definitely! I think he might be resting in the corner somewhere but I am anticipating a “triumphant” return
January 20th, 2008 at 11:10 amIs BARTLEBEE a dick?
Certainly.
Does he like the real world badgering him on that question? Obviously not.
But did he “lose it�
Hell YES.
Yes, Bartlebee did “lose itâ€.
Was he irritated by this? Does a dictionary tell the truth?
January 20th, 2008 at 11:13 amThe almost 800 comments have nothing to do with Romney. They are instead part of a graduate abnormal pysch course.
January 20th, 2008 at 11:14 amdecanted some port, drank some 1998 Riesling, had dinner, watched a movie, read a few chapters of a novel and had a great night’s sleep. Now I’m off to do the laundry. You had better get some rest so you’re prepared for the next “attack†on your Fortress of Truth.
Comment by gummitch — January 20, 2008 @ 10:24 am
Wait a second here. You decanted a Port and drank a Riesling? Am I to believe you drank a whole bottle of Port?
Who was the producer?
January 20th, 2008 at 11:21 amLBV or Tawny?
bizarre….definitly……port and riesling?…give me pinot noir…..but that’s just me……at any rate…..I’m outta here…..Have a nice day folks.
January 20th, 2008 at 11:35 amHe is no better or worse than any top tier candidate from either party.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:12 pmThe ones that could change the status quo have already been driven out by big business, the MSM and foreign interests. Why does no one mention that Obama’s campaign manager is a registered lobbyist for Big Pharma. Will that affect Obama’s health care plan? I fear that after all the dust settles we will have a new boss, the same as the old boss.
We won’t be fooled again, and again and again and again………..
Mitt Romney, not just a bigot, but also your best hope for the status quo! Vote Mitt if you think everything Bush has done is just peachy.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:14 pmVote Mitt if you think everything Bush has done is just peachy.
Comment by fletc3her — January 20, 2008 @ 12:14 pm
magic underwear is the key.
Fricking lunatic cultist.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:16 pmCould someone please wake up Bart. He must be recharged by now. Afterall it has been almost 3 hours.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:19 pmCould someone please wake up Bart. He must be recharged by now. Afterall it has been almost 3 hours.
Comment by dbadass — January 20, 2008 @ 12:19 pm
I can’t imagine he’s asleep. Crazy doesn’t sleep.
Maybe he’s working on his manifesto: Mein kmapf Part Zwei
January 20th, 2008 at 12:36 pmI don’t know what ddumbass was saying about TP but dbadass was saying that cool has never even come close to brushing up against you on a busy street corner. Try to keep people’s points a little clearer if you can in that fog
January 20th, 2008 at 2:06 pmSince it seems unlikely that you will learn to use people’s names with courtesy and since you seem a tad obsessed with Happy Days characters (as well as a bunch of other stuff), would you mind letting go of the Fonzie thing. I am way more of a Chachi type sort of fellow.
Overall you’re doing great champ. A couple hundred more and you can really show em by breaking that grand mark. Will it help if I say atheism three times fast?
January 20th, 2008 at 2:16 pmIf you’re looking for someone to misread a post, jump to an illogical conclusion and then meltdown defending it for 24 straight hours then look no further than BARTLEBEE.
He’s jumped to conclusions about my comments in the past and put words in my mouth, followed by name calling.
He insists that everyone here be polite to the other side and apologize for his misunderstandings while calling people names and insulting them.
He’s also a whining crybaby who complains to Faiz when he’s not getting his way.
No one should tolerate any further lectures from this s/he/it!! BARTELBEE is an example of the WORST the left/progressive side has to offer! It is not all of the rest of us as he claims repeatedly!!!
January 20th, 2008 at 2:20 pmMaybe you assclowns should go back to the argument that TP was actually trying to “PRAISE ROMNEYâ€, lol.
that was your argument, fruitcake. the meth has taken all of your sense.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:22 pm“…I can type faster than 6 of you at once merely points to your inferior breeding stock…”
–Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 2:22 pm
Y’all, all the proof you need that this is not a progressive. ONLY a RePugniScum TROLL could type that!!
Ignore this assh0le!!! Forever! TROLL ALERT!!!
January 20th, 2008 at 2:30 pmMight I add that all candidates should go on ad nauseum about stupid shit to show that they are totally under control about their weird loss of control about totally stupid shit.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:30 pmhow many phychiatrists does it take to change a light bulb?
It only takes one but the light bulb has to really want to change.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:33 pm198 to go! Come on crazy guy, you can make it. My apologies in advance to that weird lady down the street that has all those cats and talks to herself. In this case I just can’t help myself. It is sort of like the plastic fetus thing
January 20th, 2008 at 2:34 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 2:29 pm
If you hadn’t produced so many hundred comments it would be easier for you to go back and see that all initial insults came out of your mixed up brain chemistry.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:38 pmReally, at this point who gives a shit about any of it?
January 20th, 2008 at 2:47 pmGo f$ck yourself.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 4:57 pm
Di I really have to go through all those nonsensical paranoid everyone is ganging up on me comments. You consistently confuse people with other people. Get uptight, freak out and than tweak for hours on end. You won’t see my point here so why not print all this shit out if you have enough paper and take it to a professional for their unbiased opinion?
January 20th, 2008 at 2:48 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 2:40 pm
Why does dbadass receive the brunt of your vitriol? Don’t you still hate me too? I’m begining to feel a little left out.
:(
BTW, atheism is NOT a belief system. (My apologies for being off-topic)
January 20th, 2008 at 2:52 pmI just stood up to you, like I always do, and always will.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 2:50 pm
Actually, you collapsed into a pile of foaming rage and paranoia, as you always do, and always will.
January 20th, 2008 at 2:55 pmYou make me sick.
I mean I want to PUKE.
Like a filthy inbred troll, you sit there, reading the headline and because it doesn’t come right out and say the exact words, ROMNEY LOST HIS COOL, you act like that isn’t the ENTIRE POINT OF THE ARTICLE.
You SICKEN me, and I swear to all that is I will never, ever side with dirty lying peice of shit like YOU.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 19, 2008 @ 5:10 pm
Was everyone picking on you again?
January 20th, 2008 at 2:56 pmLIAR.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 2:52 pm
does it make him a liar, liar, pants on fire?
January 20th, 2008 at 2:58 pmBlessed are those who think themselves to be superior to those who think they are superior.
Comment by dbadass — January 19, 2008 @ 4:55 pm
TWO MINUTES prior to my comment which he claims now was me “starting the insults†he comes in and out of the blue INSULTS me.
FIRST.
And he has the nerve, to sit here this morning and claim I started with the insults.
No punk, I just told you to go do what you do every day, and go f$#k yourself, in RESPONSE to your insult of me.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 2:56 pm
oh, yeah, that’s the same as “go F$#k yourself”.
You’re lost, and out of control, like Romney.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:00 pmBesides, the one that you brought up for citation was an argument that was started by Dixie Blood when she wished for the death of Tony Snow, knowing full well that he is a cancer patient.
–Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 2:49 pm
A COMPLETE LIE!
I did not wish Tony Snow dead!! That’s your reading of my post and putting words in my mouth just like BARTLEBEE!!
My point, and let me be clear here for those who quickly jump to conclusions and look for fights!
I certainly wished him more suffering at the hands of this disease. I DID NOT WISH HIS DEATH!! That’s your misguided conclusion!
January 20th, 2008 at 3:01 pmNote that the comment our crazy friend cites makes nothing more than a statement which might or might not be taken as directed at a specific individual as per their ow psychcosis. It is also interesting to note the others who have mentioned the gentlemans predisposition to knee jerk reactionary comments and perceptions of being attacked in some self deluded idea of competition
January 20th, 2008 at 3:02 pmI think i’m done with this poking of bartlebee with a stick. It’s entirely too easy now; he’s thoroughly predictable and no challenge. besides, my legs are tired from kicking the stuffing out of him.
You folks keep at it, though. Maybe some day he’ll learn what adult behavior consists of.
No bets, though.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:03 pmDim Wit in fact is still trying to jumpstart the atheism debate, which he got his ass so cleanly handed to him on in our last 1600 comment debate.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 3:01 pm
See Bart, here you are wrong. I am not trying to jumpstate the atheism debate. I am simply trying to poke you with a stick to watch you fly off the handle.
But as you are the arbitrator of truth and fiction, I guess it is I who is wrong and you who is right.
Bartlebee, defender of truth. Do you fancy yourself a comic book superhero?
January 20th, 2008 at 3:06 pmI really liked the part about wanting to puke. So Bartlebee have you figured out yet that I am not dim wit or any othe the others you have mistaken me for yet? Remember the dumb shit about me being a pimply faced 19 year old in my mother’s basement? Your clueless
January 20th, 2008 at 3:07 pmI thought it was Republicans Hate Facts that was so not defeated in the epic Battle of Atheism”.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:09 pmHold on while I go get the quotes.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 3:03 pm
Please, take your time.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:10 pmHehehehe. As if I were being attacked by the whole population of TP, instead of bartlepee. bart the drama queen.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:12 pmDo you want me to post more?
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 3:11 pm
You may as well, since you’ve just proven yourself to be a liar.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:13 pmcome on, justassing, dig that hole a little deeper. you’re a liar, by your own hand you’ve showed us all. keep digging.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:14 pmI see bart is still doing the dance. with no partner.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:15 pmComment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 3:05 pm
actually Bart it probably means he is going to watch the Giants/Packers game which is what I’m going to do as well.
I gave you all morning to talk smack and you failed me. But now you decide to show up right as the game has started.
You can be so selfish. Have you no consideration that maybe some of us wanted to watch football later this afternoon?
January 20th, 2008 at 3:15 pmMy mistake: New England / San Diego
January 20th, 2008 at 3:17 pmCancer or no cancer Tony Snow is a Facist phu(kwad LYIN’ CO(KSU(KER from Davidson COLLEGE!! Just another Bushite MORON!!!
You would think that surviving a sometimes mortal illness, as all the well wishes from both sides of the political spectrum, would have helped this vampire reform just a touch!!
Nope, that’s why I’m now pulling for the cancer!!! Why does Tony Snow hate America?? Ask his cancer!! This GRINCH will never find his heart!!
Comment by dixie blood — January 13, 2008 @ 3:13 pm
This is what started the argument on the thread.
Do you want me to post more?
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 3:11 pm
As you can see by my own words I never wished “death” on Tony Snow. I said I was pulling for the cancer. The difference is that he might suffer more until he NOT an ENEMY of the PEOPLE!! No that he die!! That’s your misguided conclusion!!! READ AGAIN!! NO MENTION OF DEATH! NONE!!!
No death…none…you see how jumping to conclusions looks soooo stuuupiid!!
January 20th, 2008 at 3:17 pmcome on, justassing, show ussome more of your lies. you accused dixie blood of calling for Snow’s death, yet you have just proven you’re a liar. All you have is Snow-type attacks. are you cancer-ridden as well? it would be in your brain, judging from the low level of your thought process.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:18 pmToo bad Mitt and bart both lost their cool. it shows weakness of character. No surprise in either case, though.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:19 pmI don’t give a shit what Mitt did or did not lose which is why I did not take any position on that. I stand by my position that Bartlebee totally lost something but it wasn’t his cool. It was his mind and I think the 841 posts attest to my position.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:19 pmand the headline of this article is MISLEADING and NOT FACTUAL.
the headline is perfectly factual; Romney is quoted directly from the Jay Leno interview. bart is wrong on the facts, as usual.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:21 pmthat’s why I’m now pulling for the cancer!!!
Comment by dixie blood — January 13, 2008 @ 3:13 pm
Liars from the beginning.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 3:20 pm
So from that we must infer that nobody has ever survived with cancer.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:22 pmPretty lame, as usual.
You’re SO progressive.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 3:22 pm
hey, liars are subject to karma. you reap what you sow.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:23 pmBartlebee, would you be opposed to me making these comments available to some professionals and allowing them to make some assessments as to the mental state of all of the characters? I will be happy to post them without an bias or alteration and including myself.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:23 pmbart has a partner in the LOSER’S DANCE!
January 20th, 2008 at 3:24 pmWay to raise the discourse, bartie. used kotex, wow, how junior high school! you’re a pathetic weakling.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:25 pmJust so the BARTLEBEE assh0le doesn’t leave me out of context like so many others here (it’s one of his cheating methods) here we go again and I will leave it there. If this troll can’t read it then enough already. Moron is as moron does!
As you can see by my own words I never wished “death†on Tony Snow. I said I was pulling for the cancer. The difference is that he might suffer more until he NOT an ENEMY of the PEOPLE!! No that he die!! That’s your misguided conclusion!!! READ AGAIN!! NO MENTION OF DEATH! NONE!!!
No death…none…you see how jumping to conclusions looks soooo stuuupiid!!
Comment by dixie blood — January 20, 2008 @ 3:17 pm
January 20th, 2008 at 3:27 pmNote that the headline is a direct, factual quote from Romney on the Leno show.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:27 pmeverybody here is superior to bartlebee, except justassing, his favorite fellator.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:29 pmBy the way, Bartlebee
If you scroll up and read, you will find that I never made any such claim so try a different pronoun.
Crazy
January 20th, 2008 at 3:31 pmWhy don’t you copy and paste all of the comment.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 3:29 pm
justassing, you’re a proven liar, by your own hand. who should believe for one second your sob story? if you weren’t such a lying ass, maybe you’d get a little sympathy, but you have destroyed your credibility with your foul, vituperative act. nobody to blame but yourself. man up, crybaby.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:31 pmI don’t give a shit what Mitt did or did not lose which is why I did not take any position on that. I stand by my position that Bartlebee totally lost something but it wasn’t his cool. It was his mind and I think the 841 posts attest to my position.
Comment by dbadass — January 20, 2008 @ 3:19 pm
See?
Ddumbass just admits that he is a dirty, lying peice of shit.
Bartlebee
Hey Crazy guy, any chance of you explaining this? Can you show where I took a stand as per Romney or is your paranoa causing you to mistake me with someone else again?
If it helps I can spell it phonetically for you. Notice that I have yet to insult your name nor intentionally misspelled it.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:36 pmNotice that I have yet to insult your name nor intentionally misspelled it.
Comment by dbadass — January 20, 2008 @ 3:36 pm
No need. His name is guaranteed to evoke derisive laughter and snickers. he’s quite well-known as a nutcase throughout the left blogosphere.
justassing, on the other hand, is just an ass.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:40 pmHey Bartlebee,
January 20th, 2008 at 3:40 pmBy football, I assume you mean soccer as I have no interest in that other game. You’re mistaking me for Dim Wit again. Damn are you insane!
Y’all,
BUBBLEBUTT claims to be progressive but loves and defends all our enemiesand hates all of us. He loves and defends the lying, c0cksuker Tony Snow and moron Mitt Wit (Cut American Jobs) Romney.
Hell, this wimp would have served cucumber sandwiches to the Redcoats!!
January 20th, 2008 at 3:41 pmThose of you who claimed I was lying about Faiz, can now eat some more crow.
Losers.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
I have come to find the taste of crow to be a delicacy…..I at least can admit when I’m wrong….apparently you did actually get an email from him…I don’t see how that makes me a loser though…..I also don’t see how it makes your opinion more valid than mine…..they are opinions.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:47 pmBecause you can. Because you have no social morals.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 3:42 pm
i don’t believe you, because you lie at every opportunity, like bartlebee.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:51 pmOh my Bartlebee’s Army of One is ganging up on me with testicle jokes. What shall I do? Shall I go looney tunes for hours on end or maybe we can just find some more pictures of acrazy bald headed dude trying to grill some steaks.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:52 pmBartlebee is correct. It’s just about turning this site into a social group.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 3:51 pm
bartlebee is a lunatic ass, and you’re his asslicker. as if anybody should give a shit what jonah goldberg thinks. or you.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:53 pmI imagine the only balls you’re interested in are the ones you can fit into your mouth.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 3:46 pm
Faiz,
You unleashed a monster here for no reason. The story is correct as originally written. No, no, no correction or update required. BARTLEBEE played you and now is going to be your new unpaid site-monitor troll. Bad move.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:53 pmAnd if you think I was hard on this story, just wait till the MSM gets ahold of it.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 3:51 pm
now there’s a righteous equivalency: you and the professional, paid liars. excellent.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:54 pmNotice that TP didn’t change a single word of its post, bart, it merely exposed your foolishness a little more. and you think it’s a victory. what a droll little troll you are turning into.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:56 pmAfter 800 comments and over 24 hours, I’m still waiting for you to prove your “valid opinionâ€.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 3:55 pm
fred. don’t bother. bartlebee has proven many times that he’s blinded by his own perfection, and unable to see what adults can see.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:57 pmNotice that TP didn’t change a single word of its post, bart, it merely exposed your foolishness a little more. and you think it’s a victory. what a droll little troll you are turning into.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — January 20, 2008 @ 3:56 pm
That’s why I previously posted that Faiz should have just ignored this troll. Now he’s getting even more rude!
January 20th, 2008 at 3:59 pmbart is winning like Rudy is winning.
Bwahahahaha!
January 20th, 2008 at 3:59 pmI saw Romney lose his cool, as did many others, including TP. bart loses.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:00 pmLefty,
As in the thread about Tony Snow, Dixie Blood’s comments weren’t just offensive to Snow but to anyone that has survived cancer.
That’s what the crux of the arguement was. Read it. If you want to be informed.
Your insult to me doesn’t just offend me, but anybody that is now, will be or has survived cancer.
Comment by justaskin
You’re speaking for a lot of people there…some of us really are dealing with this problem and yet I am only offended by your self serving attitude about it…..funny how people like you show your colors in a blog like this and then want to demand respect….
January 20th, 2008 at 4:00 pmFaiz has made mistakes in the past, and, like today, shows that he’s still capable of making them. two worngs don’t make a right.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:01 pmYou’re just noisy.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 4:01 pm
hankie for you, crybaby?
January 20th, 2008 at 4:01 pmkeep on dancing, bart. a handful of people see what you see, a handful see what I see. your childish tantrums have changed nobody’s mind, ever, and have only served to cement the impression that you, like Romney, have lost your cool.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:04 pmI need no supporters, bart. I destroyed your puerile arguments single-handedly, and will continue to do so. Your idiocy and foul-mouthed vituperation are easy targets. You haven’t laid a glove on me, and never will.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:06 pmThis has had extremely little to do with Romney for quite some time. Print it out and have your local theather group adapt it. I think you might see something different
January 20th, 2008 at 4:08 pmOpinions, bart, simple opinions, held in good faith. what’s wrong is your insistence that everybody hold your opinion. nobody else who agrees with you has attacked everybody that doesn’t, so the problem, as usual, is you. not Faiz, not fred, not me, but you and your antisocial, immature, ill-considered ranting. and your “support” disappeared many hours ago, never to return. whaddya know about that.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:09 pmPerhaps you should go back to your argument that TP was actually trying to PRAISE Romney, lol.
:D
At least that one had a sense of comedy to it.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 4:08 pm
ah, back to your lies again. you can’t resist returning to your roots as a liar, can you? either way, you lose, because you’re a born loser, and a born liar.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:10 pmOh , yea, you and FRED.
You and FRED are all correct, and EVERYONE else, is wrong.
You’re correct, but Waynes wrong.
Plungers wrong.
Moderations wrong.
I’m wrong.
Faiz is wrong.
Pluege is wrong.
Lyona is wrong.
Jims wrong.
Even your PAL, RALPH the Wonder Idiot, is wrong.
And you TWO, are right.
:|
And you call me the crazy one, lol.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
sorry barty….you may not speak for me……show me proof…..since you’re so fond of demaning it from everyone else….where I said these people or you were wrong….I said I have a different opinion but I never tried to deny even you of your opinion…..why would you think I would let you deny me of mine?
See this boils down to opinions…..you ranted about how it is black and white but it’s not and you have a childs view of the world if you think it does.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:12 pmFrom 14 seconds in until 24 seconds in, Romney loses the smile, his throat tightens, he breaks out in a sweat, and fails to mask his anger and frustration. How blind are you, bart? Why was the video posted in the first place, if you are so damn right? Because you aren’t, that’s why. Typical pussy liberals, giving the enemy the benefit of the doubt, and all the time wondering why the incompetent repigs run all over you.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:14 pm“You on the other hand, just admitted what a dirty, lying scumbag you really are, in that you never were interested in the debate.
Only in starting trouble.
Well you got trouble dickwad.”
This, folks, is how a lunatic “talks about romney”. This is one of hundreds of examples of bart staying on topic. as you can see, the topid is bart’s anger, bart’s lack of control, bart’s rudeness, and bart’s immaturity. Nothing about Romney at all, just personal attacks on somebody who doesn’t share his opinion.
pretty sad. but very revealing.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:17 pmHow am I denying you of your opinion little Freddie?
:|
HUH?
HOW?
By CHALLENGING IT?
Comment by BARTLEBEE
by calling me a liar and telling me I am wrong in what I say is my opinion…….what is complicated about that?
January 20th, 2008 at 4:19 pmWell you got trouble dickwad.
Because I’m still here, and you’ve been proven to be moot.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 4:11 pm
If you mean trouble like when the crazy guy keeps following you down the boulevard maybe. If this is tough guy talk. Not so much. Anyway
So what where you toughts on my earlier idea….
Bartlebee, would you be opposed to me making these comments available to some professionals and allowing them to make some assessments as to the mental state of all of the characters? I will be happy to post them without an bias or alteration and including myself.
Comment by dbadass — January 20, 2008 @ 3:23 pm
January 20th, 2008 at 4:24 pmThe following is a copy of an email I sent to Faiz. I urge all of you, reasonable, people to send a similar message.
Hi Faiz
I could not be more disappointed in your decision to placate an infantile, abusive, disruptive, malcontent like BARTLEBEE. He is the worst of the “trolls” which plagues your site and should be removed. I think you owe an apology to all who have been subjected to the vicious, abusive, ravings of BARTLEBEE. I think you made a tragic mistake which damages the credibility of Think Progress and the Center for American Progress.
I hope, some day, you decide to raise the level of moderation to match your site’s content. As it is? TP is not a forum for the exchange of ideas. It’s a pitiful joke which serves only to foster ill will. A joke which is no longer amusing.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:25 pmHow am I denying you of your opinion little Freddie?
:|
HUH?
HOW?
By CHALLENGING IT?
Comment by BARTLEBEE
by calling me a liar and telling me I am wrong in what I say is my opinion…….what is complicated about that?
Comment by Fred
you need to address this bart….please try to think before you post and not slander…..try to actually make a point that makes sense and is logical
January 20th, 2008 at 4:26 pmYou comments offend anyone that has, and anyone that feels compassion to cancer patients and survivors.
Your discourse is ugly social unconsciousness.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 4:05 pm
Why is it that when some kid in Iraq gets blown to peices by American bombs we shrug it off as colateral damage, but when a piece of shit like Snow gets cancer and someone makes a comment about it now becomes offensive to anyone who has had cancer?
It must be the same hypocrisy that proclaims abortions as baby killing but also proclaims universal healthcare as government welfare.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:28 pmThe REST of us, who are just HONEST AMERICANS, want the TRUTH, and not their untenable “opinions†that they try to sell as truth.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 4:24 pm
The problem is that you don’t want the actual truth. You only want your version of it.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:31 pm923 Pete, I sent mine to Faiz.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:35 pmLooks like the JustAsking Bartlebee Show is going into re-runs already.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:37 pmHow am I denying you of your opinion little Freddie?
:|
HUH?
HOW?
By CHALLENGING IT?
Comment by BARTLEBEE
by calling me a liar and telling me I am wrong in what I say is my opinion…….what is complicated about that?
Comment by Fred
you need to address this bart….please try to think before you post and not slander…..try to actually make a point that makes sense and is logical
January 20th, 2008 at 4:39 pmShow us all your “truthâ€!
MAKE YOUR ARGUMENT!!!
You’ve had 800 comemnts and over 24 hours of insulting BARTLEBEE.
If you couldn’t present your “truth†in that time frame, its not our fault.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 4:34 pm
There is NO truth, you self centered fool.
Its an opinion. TP has posted the video and the person watching it gets to make the decision about whether they feel Mitt’s response is in line with his prior commentary.
But no. you don’t get this. You just have to be right. So YOU make it about right and wrong, truth and fiction. But thats just YOU. That doesn’t make this about anything more than what it really is, which is the decision of the viewer to decide.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:45 pmDoes it feel good when I’m back behin…I mean, backing you up, Bartlebee?
January 20th, 2008 at 4:46 pmJustasking…
They have no core beliefs or values. I don’t why they call themselves progressive liberals.
Someone must have told them it was cool or something.
Comment by justasking
your core beliefs seem to be that you have the moral authority to decide for all of us what is right and wrong….no discussion from you just judgement………now think of something to say that is not judgmental..but make some kind of legitimate point please.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:48 pmThere is NO truth, you self centered fool.
Its an opinion. TP has posted the video and the person watching it gets to make the decision about whether they feel Mitt’s response is in line with his prior commentary.
But no. you don’t get this. You just have to be right. So YOU make it about right and wrong, truth and fiction. But thats just YOU. That doesn’t make this about anything more than what it really is, which is the decision of the viewer to decide.
Comment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 4:45 pm
That just needed repeating…Thanks dim wit!
January 20th, 2008 at 4:50 pmSorry Bart. The “update” is not a retraction. Merely an acknowledgment that one “squeaky wheel” has a different opinion.
My opinion is that Mitt “lost his cool” and, if one views this clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdGUSjd3Tmo
It’s more obvious.
What’s more telling is that, at the end of the youtube/cnn video, Mitt goes after the reporter following the conclusion of the speech. He was plainly angry the reporter called him on his lie. I have no idea why TP used the clip they chose as it doesn’t show the second exchange and is of poor quality.
BTW, If one googles “Romney loses cool” there are a number of stories out there which reflect my opinion, and a few that don’t. Many people share my opinion, and many don’t. Personally, I have no problem with that. But, Bart is still WRONG for attacking people who, without attacking him, refuse to cave to his point of view. And? TP is DOUBLY WRONG for tolerating such behavior from anyone. Indeed they need to clean up this “cesspool”.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:52 pmThe TRUTH is the truth. And lefty idiot calling for tony snows cancer to WIN, is as disgusting as anything coming from the right.
He sickens me. They sicken me.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 4:32 pm
bart, do you want to see osama bin laden dead?
yes or no?
which is it? do you want to see another human being die (you sick bastard)or are you an al qaida sympathizer?
January 20th, 2008 at 4:53 pmFred.
I thought you were never going to respond to Bartlebee again. You were spouting that he was going to be non-existent to you.
Don’t make me go get THAT post.
Comment by justasking
What, another distraction rather than answer the question posed? You make my point for me. thanks….I already stated that I loved the taste of crow so you can go get it and post if if you would rather do that than actually enter into a dialog and answer our questions.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:55 pmFred.
I thought you were never going to respond to Bartlebee again. You were spouting that he was going to be non-existent to you.
Don’t make me go get THAT post.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 4:48 pm
Fred was talking about you.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:56 pmBut, Bart is still WRONG for attacking people who, without attacking him, refuse to cave to his point of view. And? TP is DOUBLY WRONG for tolerating such behavior from anyone. Indeed they need to clean up this “cesspoolâ€.
Comment by Impolitics — January 20, 2008 @ 4:52 pm
Faiz was plaayyed!!
January 20th, 2008 at 4:57 pmComment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 4:48 pm
Fred was talking about you.
Comment by Impolitics — January 20, 2008 @ 4:56 pm
I stand corrected.
January 20th, 2008 at 4:59 pmWe’re waiting for your opinionated evidence, but you fail to produce it.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Well I guess I need a definition…..My dictionary says this is not a word…….
opinionated
furthermore….opinionated evidence seems to contradict itself….much as you do bart.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:00 pmDon’t make me go get THAT post.
Comment by justasking
While you’re back there, how about some of your early postings to this blog; when you came on all caring and concerned, and begged us to be kind and civil to one another… come to think of it, that was about the same time your friend Bartee started to lose his cool.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:00 pmAre you sure you two aren’t in the same room together?
Like WHERE EXACTLY on the video does Romney do anything even remotely close to “losing his cool�
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 4:57 pm
14 seconds into the TP clip. He’s flustered. He changes his tune in mid word. He clenches his teeth. He flushes a bit. And, eventually, he just evades the issue with a cheap semantic trick. It’s more obvious in the CNN clip which also shows the second confrontation.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:04 pmThey have no core beliefs or values. I don’t why they call themselves progressive liberals.
Someone must have told them it was cool or something.
Comment by justasking
your core beliefs seem to be that you have the moral authority to decide for all of us what is right and wrong….no discussion from you just judgement………now think of something to say that is not judgmental..but make some kind of legitimate point please.
I’ve answered your questions…how about it…..you going to continue to be dishonest or are you going to try to be something besides an irritant?
January 20th, 2008 at 5:09 pmComment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 5:01 pm
You can post that comment forever. I STAND BY IT!!
I would have shot a Redcoat in the head. You would have the bastard live and loved and respected because he had CANCER!!!
Bahhhahahahah wwhahahah bbahahaa waahaha!!
January 20th, 2008 at 5:10 pm959 now what is the definition of irrational?
January 20th, 2008 at 5:12 pmBald Guy Grills Steaks
January 20th, 2008 at 5:14 pmFreddie needs a few more years on the Speak-N-Spell before we debate him again.
Otherwise, its like trying to explain Red Shift to a Chimpanzee.
:|
He just doesn’t get it, because he’s illiterate.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
now you’re just pickin on me…..you and justaskin….why…whatidIdo? How’s is sound coming from someone else bart?
January 20th, 2008 at 5:16 pmBlue Shift to a bonobo might be a lot easier. Weird freaking comparisons.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:21 pmMaybe Fred should cry like a little girl about his mistreatment at the hands of the forces aligned against him in an imaginary battle of Truth. That seems to keep em talking. Less than 50 to go Crazy Guy
But don’t you want the last word?
January 20th, 2008 at 5:24 pmtruth be told…….this is getting old……lots of people here have tried to help you back up on that rocker bart…too bad you can’t see the effort for what it is…….by the way justaskin isn’t really your friend…..she’s just using you…….think about it.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:25 pmMain Entry: opin·ion·at·ed
Pronunciation: \-yÉ™-ËŒnÄ-tÉ™d\
Function: adjective
Date: 1601
: unduly adhering to one’s own opinion or to preconceived notions
— opin·ion·at·ed·ly adverb
— opin·ion·at·ed·ness noun
——
:|
Now, hows that CROW tasting this morning?
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 5:07 pm
Only a mere 959 comments before Bart busted out the dictionary.
Fred, watch now as the Barlebee’s debate will turn to all of us agruing with the dictionary…..
January 20th, 2008 at 5:26 pmThat’s what makes your current comment so sick.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 5:27 pm
That’s nothing compared to the plastic fetus stuff
January 20th, 2008 at 5:31 pmSo I have instructed Faiz to remove my comments from the Article above and to disable my account.
I am done playing with wimps, who can’t stand up to a debate so they go running crying to mommy to complain.
So long suckers.
BARTLEBEE’s outta here.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — January 20, 2008 @ 5:22 pm
Who compained?
And I thought we were just getting started.
I guess JA, the Rastaman’s god, is going to have to step up to the plate now.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:31 pmI do believe that bart got himself banned….
January 20th, 2008 at 5:31 pmIF Fred is correct we need about 20 dozen comments
January 20th, 2008 at 5:34 pmWho compained?
And I thought we were just getting started.
I guess JA, the Rastaman’s god, is going to have to step up to the plate now.
Comment by dim wit
Pete sent and email to Faiz and suggested that others do likewise…..I sent one
January 20th, 2008 at 5:35 pmI mean 2 dozen.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:36 pmOf yeah, Atheism might actually be a belief ssystem
Screw this, now we need 400.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:37 pmBest to you all
Manners matter!
“Rastaman no give up”
January 20th, 2008 at 5:41 pmsee ya-
“But I’ll be sure to use this comment as back up of my original postings.”
Comment by justasking
Please don’t misunderstand me, we were not fooled by the meek and caring initial entrance.
This as a common ploy among trolls.
It was what attracted attention to your baiting tactics.
Not that I thought you were a newbie by any stretch of the imagination.
And, my comment is no substitute for your original postings.
January 20th, 2008 at 5:48 pmLOL
With all respect to Fred and Dim Wit. I prefer to be addressed as an individual
January 20th, 2008 at 5:51 pmWe were about to 1K. WTF happened? 634?
January 20th, 2008 at 5:53 pmstep lightly justaskin…..apparenly you can be asked to leave as bart has shown…..he really tried though and I don’t believe you have that kind of stamina…..you are a shadow troll….
January 20th, 2008 at 5:54 pmSorry dixie blood but I am afraid we broke his brain
January 20th, 2008 at 5:55 pmWe were about to 1K. WTF happened? 634?
Comment by dixie blood
I think bart was banned and his posts removed…..
January 20th, 2008 at 5:55 pmBartlebee has been deleted, that’s what happened….
January 20th, 2008 at 5:56 pm637-9,
That’s good news. I feel better now. I’m starting to calm down. Thanks to everyone….
January 20th, 2008 at 5:59 pmIt’s Jah.
I guess you’re going to go inot insulting Rastarfarians.
you’re so liberal.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 5:38 pm
Its JustAsking – JA
its a play on words. My My, you a touchy troll aren’t you.
Is this better:
I guess JA, the German word for yes, is going to have to step up to the plate now.
Ja, Ja, I imagine that would be much more approriate for you, ja?
And by the way, yes, I am sooooo liberal.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:06 pmI didn’t say substitute. I said it was evidence.
Comment by justasking
“Gee, Never. Thanks, though I don’t know who you are.
Your post reveals how I initially came to post on TP. I think you’re probably the only one of the “regulars†that can admit to that truth. They spin this neocon troll reasoning week after week about me because I don’t “want to be part of the groupâ€. I don’t know if you’ve ever joined in on that mantra, but you probably did change your opinion more than once to suit the collective thought or “group thinkâ€.
But I’ll be sure to use this comment as back up of my original postings.”
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 5:14 pm
I’m not finding the term evidence in your post….
And you did try to substitute my comment in lieu of a sample of your early posts….
(The evidence is your early postings. No one needs to take my word for it.)
January 20th, 2008 at 6:11 pmI know how to keep a database too.
Comment by justasking
What an odd statement….very telling.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:11 pmWell, kids, that’s what happens when you flag an idiot for being abusive and nasty. Bye-bye, bart, those were my flags that got your tossed. Now who’s the LOSER?
On your own, now, justassing. best of luck, you’ll need it.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:14 pmNo you’re not.
You’re prejudiced. shows in the way you “play†on words about other people’s religion.
Comment by justasking
You aren’t here to discuss anything and that is why you are irrelivant. You are just a troll here to try to pass judgement on your superiors.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:18 pmWell, kids, that’s what happens when you flag an idiot for being abusive and nasty. Bye-bye, bart, those were my flags that got your tossed. Now who’s the LOSER?
On your own, now, justassing. best of luck, you’ll need it.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — January 20, 2008 @ 6:14 pm
I helped! I flagged, copied, and pasted every single incident of, unprovoked, abuse (I should have counted them. It took hours.). Plus three emails to Faiz. The “dear departed” Bart was a stain on every person who visits this site. Far worse than any annoying little neocon troll.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:20 pmA lot of people here can only show that they’re liberal by the way they would cast a vote. ONE VOTE.
Not in a philosophical, social or intrinstic way of what being liberal really is.
Comment by justasking
another irrelevant baseless judgment call. Got any way you can prove such a generalization of such a large group of people.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:21 pmYou’re prejudiced. shows in the way you “play†on words about other people’s religion.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:10 pm
My apologies to Bart for thinking no one could be more off kilter than he. Clearly you have proven me wrong in this respect. You are a neo-con aren’t you. You use the Rush philosophy of taking everything out of context.
Exactly how did I offend the Rasta religion? hmmm? By referencing their god I am now somehow offending them? If that is the case every Republican on the campaign trail is an offense to Christianity.
Then again why are you even here? You have already noted ” I don’t “want to be part of the group” “
January 20th, 2008 at 6:24 pmI helped! I flagged, copied, and pasted every single incident of, unprovoked, abuse (I should have counted them. It took hours.). Plus three emails to Faiz. The “dear departed†Bart was a stain on every person who visits this site. Far worse than any annoying little neocon troll.
Comment by Impolitics
I also sent faiz an email advising him to monitor this thread. Flags helped too apparently.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:24 pmWhat does it tell you.
I bet you can’t even MAKE UP a good guess that will show you have any idea what you’re talking about.
Comment by justasking
I guess not since I can’t make any sense of this gibberish……is that spelled correctly….please correct me if not…..
January 20th, 2008 at 6:28 pmjustaskin…..you tryin to take barts place in the cookoo nest…your qualifications are showing.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:29 pmI don’t need to be part of the mediocre group that you’re in.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:26 pm
Hey, what group is that?
January 20th, 2008 at 6:31 pmA lot of people here can only show that they’re liberal by the way they would cast a vote. ONE VOTE.
Not in a philosophical, social or intrinstic way of what being liberal really is.
Comment by justasking
We’ve addressed your questions…how about just once you take a stance and argue your point…my assessment of your statement follows.
another irrelevant baseless judgment call. Got any way you can prove such a generalization of such a large group of people.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:34 pmAnd you spelling skills are not.
Comment by justasking
your petty judgmentalism is showing….please correct your grammer and re-submit.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:36 pmI don’t need to be part of the mediocre group that you’re in.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:26 pm
So go away assh0le! Who needs you? No one here!!! Just STFU you moronic, RePuginScum Ghoul-Aid guzzling, syphilis infected,( I could be wrong here—you know, no sex?), BLOG RAPER!!
January 20th, 2008 at 6:41 pm*sigh
“the mediocre groupâ€â€¦the one I’m not in, remember?
The one that knows what the name Zooey really means.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:37 pm
Really? It looks like you’re in the group — you’re always here.
Does Fred know what “Zooey” really means? You’re treating him like he’s in our “group.”
January 20th, 2008 at 6:41 pmThe one that knows what the name Zooey really means.
Comment by justasking
hmm. That seems unnecesarily uncivilized. More of your petty passing judgement. How is the view from under that bridge?
January 20th, 2008 at 6:41 pmAnd you spelling skills are not.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:33 pm
HAHA!
January 20th, 2008 at 6:43 pmYou’re passive aggressive. Which is wimpy.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:31 pm
And you’re wimpy. Which is sad. Are you still here, sniveling and boo-hooing?
“I don’t need to be part of the mediocre group that you’re in.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:26 pm”
Really? Gee, you’re here more than anyone else. I wonder who needs who?
January 20th, 2008 at 6:47 pmGee, Dixie.
Don’t you realize what you’re doing?
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:44 pm
Yes I do. And your point is troll?
January 20th, 2008 at 6:48 pmA lot of people here can only show that they’re liberal by the way they would cast a vote. ONE VOTE.
Not in a philosophical, social or intrinstic way of what being liberal really is.
Comment by justasking
We’ve addressed your questions…how about just once you take a stance and argue your point…my assessment of your statement follows.
another irrelevant baseless judgment call. Got any way you can prove such a generalization of such a large group of people.
still nothing from you except generalizations and judgment.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:51 pmdinner time…..justaskin..if you have time maybe you can address my last post and I’ll come back and see if you were up to the task or if you do as I suspect you will and dodge it…..heh….pretty sure I know how this will come out.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:55 pmI’ll let you make the point…please continue.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:54 pm
So basically, you have no point. I think I pointed that out many hours ago. Your a feces-flinger, a hit-and-runner, an empty vessel, right? Show us, in an intrinsic, philosophical, social way, what a real liberal is.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:57 pmComment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 6:41 pm
Fred,
“Zooey” doesn’t really mean anything. It’s just short for Zookeeper, which was the name I used when I first started posting here three years ago.
Wanna be in my “group” now? ;)
January 20th, 2008 at 6:57 pmYes I do. And your point is troll?
Comment by dixie blood — January 20, 2008 @ 6:48 pm
I’ll let you make the point…please continue.
Comment by justasking
dodge…..weave…..poke…jab….you’re a regular mohamed ali…..but transparent.
January 20th, 2008 at 6:58 pmI’ll let you make the point…please continue.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:54 pm
January 20th, 2008 at 6:59 pmLazy facist phu(k like always!!!
Comment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 6:41 pm
Fred,
“Zooey†doesn’t really mean anything. It’s just short for Zookeeper, which was the name I used when I first started posting here three years ago.
Wanna be in my “group†now? ;)
Comment by Zooey
I just knew it wasn’t what justaskin was implying……..I’m social……I like a drink and a song.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:01 pmBecause even after I corrected you that the spelling was “Jah†and not “Ja†you still had no reverence for your later comments.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 6:31 pm
Ha Ha Ha.
I have no reverance for my later comments!!!!
why do you?
(be sure to add this to you database for use against me at a later time)
January 20th, 2008 at 7:01 pmDing! Dong! BART is Gone! I have returned as promised.
A little bird told me, in his mad quest to be “right”, he refused a personal request from Faiz to cut out the BS. (Probably in a very nasty manner) I hope this doesn’t mean he’ll start prowling the streets. But, maybe his behavior will earn him the help he so obviously needs.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:04 pmY’all,
I’m gonna stop poking facist phu(k JustAnAss with a stick. I feel sorry for the reptile now. He’s so tiring and shallow. And he’s shedding his skin now that his BUBBLEBUT Buddy (BBB) has run away!
Bwahaahahaa!!
January 20th, 2008 at 7:06 pmSo, justasskissing. Do you have a point, aside from character assassination? Do you have an opinion on Mr. Romney’s composure? Or, are you just another nasty, feces-flinging, troll? The world awaits your sage words.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:08 pmI just knew it wasn’t what justaskin was implying……..I’m social……I like a drink and a song.
Comment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 7:01 pm
Then you’d like Friday nights on TheZoo — music night!
justasking is like a politician who’s been in DC for 25 years, but who wants to be known as an “outsider.”
Apparently justasking’s been around long enough to know me as Zookeeper, which I changed about 1.5 years ago, but he’s too chickenshit to admit what his name was before.
Maybe he’s “unbelievable!” Is that you unbe?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:08 pmMaybe you should google it.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:05 pm
It really doesn’t matter. Whatever “the Google” has to say about the name Zooey, it has nothing to do with my choice of the name.
What do YOU think it means? Hmmmm…?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:10 pmMaybe you should google it.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:05 pm
Why do you have to be such a prick? What kind of point are you trying to make by shoving your chosen meaning down her throat?
Talk about being an insensitive a$$hole….
What does my name mean? Should I use “the google” to figure it out or are you going to be a man and just tell me I’m ’stoopid’
January 20th, 2008 at 7:12 pmIt really doesn’t matter. Whatever “the Google†has to say about the name Zooey, it has nothing to do with my choice of the name.
What do YOU think it means? Hmmmm…?
Comment by Zooey — January 20, 2008 @ 7:10 pm
Damn, you beat me to it!
January 20th, 2008 at 7:14 pmThen you’d like Friday nights on TheZoo — music night!
Fill me in. Is this like the C&L LNMC music links. Or, are you streaming a mix? Videos?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:16 pmWhat’s up with you, justasking? Seriously.
It seems as if you’re of a fairly liberal mind (I could be wrong), but you never really say what you think. You just spend all your time stirring things up. What’s up with that?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:16 pmA lot of people here can only show that they’re liberal by the way they would cast a vote. ONE VOTE.
Not in a philosophical, social or intrinstic way of what being liberal really is.
Comment by justasking
We’ve addressed your questions…how about just once you take a stance and argue your point…my assessment of your statement follows.
another irrelevant baseless judgment call. Got any way you can prove such a generalization of such a large group of people.
still nothing from you except generalizations and judgment.
……………………………………………………………………………………..
Ding! Dong! BART is Gone! I have returned as promised.
A little bird told me, in his mad quest to be “rightâ€, he refused a personal request from Faiz to cut out the BS. (Probably in a very nasty manner) I hope this doesn’t mean he’ll start prowling the streets. But, maybe his behavior will earn him the help he so obviously needs.
Comment by pete
I followed your lead with and email to Faiz… I just suggested that he audit the thread…..see for himself.
bart basically said as much here Pete and then his posts all started dissapprearing.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:16 pmAnother troll obsessed with Zooey? Nah, just another coat of paint on a decrepit little shack of sh!t.
Comment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 7:12 pm
Hi dim wit. Looks like our old nemesis crossed the line. I’m amazed it took so long.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:17 pmThat’s a lot differnt than your other comments about me has been.
I’ve been consistent. What’s changed YOUR mind?
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:21 pm
Really? I guess I’d have some basis for comparison if I knew what name you’ve used in the past. You’ve been consistent? You’ve always stirred things up, and never offered an opinion of your own? Are you satisfied with that?
Actually, I haven’t changed my mind about anything. I’m just wondering why you engage people this way.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:26 pmComment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 7:16 pm
Greetings Fred. Nice to meet you. I admire your ability to “keep your cool”. I had the unfortunate experience of tangling with “MARTYBEE” once before. I even left the site rather than read his crap. Him or me. It was bad for my blood pressure.
You know. It’s actually a bit sad. If “MARTYBEE” had been able to distinguish between disagreement and “attacks”, he’s not too bad. But, he’s got problems. And he lies. And he spams. And denies the very existence of contrary opinions. And he even turns on people who try to agree with him.
Hmm? I guess he is that bad. I half expect he will appear under another alias when he sees me here. But, he shouldn’t be hard to spot.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:27 pmComment by Zooey — January 20, 2008 @ 7:26 pm
Hi Zooey. I’m baaack. Lots of catching up to do. How’s things in Zooey’s world?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:30 pmFar worse than any annoying little neocon troll.
Comment by Impolitics — January 20, 2008 @ 6:20 pm
i was only kidding; I know everybody helped. Excellent work, all around.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:32 pmComment by pete — January 20, 2008 @ 7:30 pm
Absolutely fantastic, as usual! Could do with a little less snow, but otherwise, can’t complain. You?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:36 pmI’ve been consistent. What’s changed YOUR mind?
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:21 pm
You’ve been consistent in your inability to fashion a thought or reach a conclusion. You have no philosophy, thus, no standing. You are only here because you’re so painfully lonely.
That’s what happens to liars. Everybody rejects them.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:39 pmComment by Zooey — January 20, 2008 @ 7:36 pm
Super! Recovering nicely from some health issues and enjoying some leisure time.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pmRight, Zooey.
At least you’re not drunk tonight.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:43 pm
Why would it matter to you?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:45 pmComment by pete — January 20, 2008 @ 7:43 pm
Recovering being the key word. I hope you continue along that road, Pete.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:46 pmLess than 300 hundred. Come on now gang do it for the B!.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:47 pmZooey get’s drunk when she rinses with Scope.
Comment by dbadass — January 20, 2008 @ 7:47 pm
You’ll notice a certain B is gone, dbadass.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:50 pmi was only kidding; I know everybody helped. Excellent work, all around.
Comment by Lefty Patriot — January 20, 2008 @ 7:32 pm
Plenty of credit to go around. I think we may have found a way to help “civilize” the site. Send in the offending posts (there couldn’t have been more than a few hundred!) along with heartfelt appeals to management.
Now? It’s time to give the football game my full attention.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:52 pmLater.
Don’t know if you and Zooey want me to go back to those first posts I received from you.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:48 pm
Your first as “justasking,” or your first as whoever you used to be?
You’re ignoring my questions.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:53 pmNo one need ask what your screen name is all about.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:54 pmWhy doesn’t it matter to you?
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:51 pm
It’s my own business. Why are you sticking your nose in?
January 20th, 2008 at 7:54 pmRecovering being the key word. I hope you continue along that road, Pete.
Comment by Zooey — January 20, 2008 @ 7:46 pm
I’m too damn stubborn not to.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:55 pmComment by Zooey — January 20, 2008 @ 7:50 p
The best part is the tingly freshness of the victory kiss
January 20th, 2008 at 7:56 pmDon’t know if you and Zooey want me to go back to those first posts I received from you.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:48 pm
JA uses his database like Barlebee used his emoticons.
(be sure to file this one JA)
- – - – -
I don’t have to tell you you’re “stoopidâ€. YOU picked the self explanatory name.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:17 pm
awe, golly, thanks!
January 20th, 2008 at 7:56 pmI’m too damn stubborn not to.
Comment by pete — January 20, 2008 @ 7:55 pm
Good!!
January 20th, 2008 at 7:56 pmThe best part is the tingly freshness of the victory kiss
Comment by dbadass — January 20, 2008 @ 7:56 pm
Heh. ;)
January 20th, 2008 at 7:58 pmDon’t know if you and Zooey want me to go back to those first posts I received from you.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:48 pm
I don’t care at all. Whatever I say, I stand by, especially if I was particularly rough on a poser like you. What’s your disease tonight? How about rectal-cranial inversion? that should be slightly more believable than whining about cancer to get some sympathy.
January 20th, 2008 at 7:58 pmWow, so BARTLEBEE is gone? He really did flip out about this issue, and the atheist issue previously. Once he started going off on everyone who disagreed, I had to leave the thread. Most of the time, BART was fine. But man, if you disagreed with him and refused to back down? Sheesh.
If you come back, BART, under whatever handle, please just calm down. When you are lucid, you make valid points. But there is a switch in you that is flipped, that you need to learn to flip back off. Such an incessant refusal to back down, and to essentially scream for 9+ hours straight is going to give you a heart attack, literally. :(
January 20th, 2008 at 8:00 pmYou’re drunk again.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 7:55 pm
Really? What evidence you have of that?
You know, I’m being decent to you, which is what you allegedly want from people on TP, and yet you are insulting me.
That’s not very consistent, is it?
January 20th, 2008 at 8:00 pmHmm? I guess he is that bad. I half expect he will appear under another alias when he sees me here. But, he shouldn’t be hard to spot.
Comment by pete — January 20, 2008 @ 7:27 pm
He’s a self-righteous phony with anger management issues. He doesn’t phase me in the least any more; it’s just a game he can never win. justassing has the same pathology, with even less of a center, and no morals whatsoever. they remind me of the old “michael” troll, who never had a point to make.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:01 pmIs that all you got? Hate of makind?
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 8:05 pm
Wow. Contradict yourself much?
January 20th, 2008 at 8:10 pmFYI: Bartlebee specifically requested that I “cancel” and “disable” his account. I have done so. Whenever an account is deleted, all the comments are also deleted.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:10 pmIn honor of this thread I suggest we all admit and describe a single time in life when we lost control.
I got super messed up mostly on alcohol and got washed off the seawall one time. If I hadn’t already been mush I could have been what with the wave action upon the stone jetty. I made it home but looked like a wharf rat.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:10 pmIs that all you got? Hate of makind?
Comment by justasking
Did you mean “mah kind”?
We don’t hate you.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:11 pmWe don’t hate mosquitos, either.
We just swat at annoying pests as a matter of course.
Comment by Faiz — January 20, 2008 @ 8:10 pm
Thanks for letting us know, Faiz.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:12 pmComment by dbadass — January 20, 2008 @ 8:10 pm
I threw a kitchen knife at my sister, and ended up murdering my mom’s kitchen curtain.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:15 pmThanks Faiz.
Farewell, Bartlebee.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:16 pmP.S. You forgot your pal…
All I did was fall into the sea. Zooey tried to kill the window treatments. Come on we, owe it to a crazy person that sometimes had something to say
January 20th, 2008 at 8:29 pmHey Bart, if you’re out there, when you quit this site, all of your comments went along with you.
As such, you no longer got the last comment on the Huckabee phone-call-from-God debate.
- – - – -
Like I said a month ago, they’re just a couple of idiots, arguing with the dictionary.
Comment by BARTLEBEE — December 25, 2007 @ 5:52 pm
I see you have chosen to ignore facts, reason, and logic and go back to your “the dictionary says I’m right†arguement.
Comment by dim wit — December 26, 2007 @ 1:04 pm
Thanks for the parting gift Bart!
You’ll be missed.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:36 pm“discompassionate”
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 8:05 pm
“discompassionate” ??? WTF? That’s not a word!
JustAnAss — Stupid much?
January 20th, 2008 at 8:39 pmThanks for the parting gift Bart!
You’ll be missed.
Comment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 8:36 pm
NOT!!!
January 20th, 2008 at 8:41 pmComment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 8:36 pm
Necessary?
January 20th, 2008 at 8:42 pmComment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 8:36 pm
Necessary?
Comment by Zooey — January 20, 2008 @ 8:42 pm
Necessary? Perhaps not. Yet, as one of “MARTYRBEE’s” targets, I think it’s justified. I have zero tolerance for someone who calls others liars, and much worse, for taking a contrary position on a subject which is in dispute.
So far as I’m concerned, he deserves every contemptuous remark sent his way.
January 20th, 2008 at 8:58 pmMaybe you should read this:
Compassion in a Discompassionate World, by Dr. Joseph Stowell
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 9:02 pm
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
now the good doctor is making words up, and justassing is buying it. Oh, well, no accounting for stupid.
January 20th, 2008 at 9:14 pmGreetings Fred. Nice to meet you. I admire your ability to “keep your coolâ€. I had the unfortunate experience of tangling with “MARTYBEE†once before. I even left the site rather than read his crap. Him or me. It was bad for my blood pressure.
You know. It’s actually a bit sad. If “MARTYBEE†had been able to distinguish between disagreement and “attacksâ€, he’s not too bad. But, he’s got problems. And he lies. And he spams. And denies the very existence of contrary opinions. And he even turns on people who try to agree with him.
Hmm? I guess he is that bad. I half expect he will appear under another alias when he sees me here. But, he shouldn’t be hard to spot.
Comment by pete
Hello yourself Pete. Much calmer discussion here it seems….thanks for taking a lead in resoving it. I honestly have never seen anything like what happened here and I agree that bart probably is in need of counciling at the very least.
Not too hard to stay cool once you realize that somone is literally round the bend but then what to do becomes the issue. Glad TP finally took a look. I’m pretty sure it wasn’t a hard decision that something had to be done.
January 20th, 2008 at 9:23 pmComment by Fred — January 20, 2008 @ 9:23 pm
Thanx, but, I don’t think I “took the lead”. I just saw an opportunity to give things a little push. I don’t think it would have worked without the calm approach displayed by you and a few others. Otherwise the complaint about baseless insults would not have held water.
January 20th, 2008 at 9:44 pmComment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 8:36 pm
Necessary?
Comment by Zooey — January 20, 2008 @ 8:42 pm
No. I didn’t mean it that way.
You’ll notice I clearly said this in the post before:
I’ll miss him and to be quite honest, I’m pissed everyone complained.
Comment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 8:26 pm
- – - – -
I never wanted to see Bart gone. While I disagreed with him, I think he had the “right” to post whatever crazy talk he wanted to. I didn’t complain to Faiz. I didn’t e-mail TP. I think its ironic he’s gone (it was his own doing) but I’m not taking credit for it.
As for the Huckabee post, Bart was right about one thing. I said I wouldn’t let him get the last word. Well I got lazy and didn’t post for a day or two and that bastard DID get the last word, thereby proving me wrong. I think it is only comic irony that since HE quit, and he took all of his posts with him, HE gave me the last word.
So, for the record, I wasn’t taking a parting shot at him.
January 20th, 2008 at 10:55 pmstill a non issue…..and what happened to my previous comments?…oh…ok………nevermind.Greetings Zooey….mudshark signing off……adios.
January 20th, 2008 at 11:04 pmRastarfaians have already been joked about on this site.. Please just be intelligent/sophiscated in your response, Lefty.
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 9:28 pm
Really. Where?
January 20th, 2008 at 11:25 pmI never wanted to see Bart gone. While I disagreed with him, I think he had the “right†to post whatever crazy talk he wanted to. I didn’t complain to Faiz. I didn’t e-mail TP.
Comment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 10:55 pm
I did. Disagreement and trollish insults are one thing, but, out and out slander is quite different. Argue all you wish, but, unjustly calling someone a “liar” for holding a contrary opinion is inexcusable. I was able to live with him slandering me and was content to avoid TP comments. However, when he was mentioned on another site doing the same thing again with a fresh set of victims? I had no hesitation “dropping a dime on him” so to speak. And, if he returns to pull the same crap? I’ll do it again. And again.
G’night dw.
January 21st, 2008 at 12:01 amI’m with Pete. Bart totally derailed this thread and slandered most of the people here…..complaints to TP did not include requests to ban him…at least I didn’t and when TP approached Bart and requested that he tone it down he refused and so that’s how that went. I would do it again. There is really no excuse for any blog or discussion group allowing that kind of behavior and I am appalled that the trolls have almost free reighn here.
I too believe that bart needs some serious mental health assistance and I don’t believe what was going on here (apparently on multiple occations)was beneficial for him in any way. I think it nearly destroys him. That in itself is enough reason in my opinion to put a stop to it. So, bottom line, if you really cared abut Bartlebee you would have wanted to end this for Barts sake.
January 21st, 2008 at 12:40 am“discompassionate†??? WTF? That’s not a word!
JustAnAss — Stupid much?
Comment by dixie blood — January 20, 2008 @ 8:39 pm
Maybe you should read this:
Compassion in a Discompassionate World, by Dr. Joseph Stowell
Comment by justasking — January 20, 2008 @ 9:02 pm
The word in not in the dictionary (www dot m-w dot com) so Stowell is an idiot too!
January 21st, 2008 at 6:20 amThis is a public service announcement from Bartlebee to Pete and anyone else boasting of getting Bartlebee banned. This is NOT a message from the author of this comment.
Bartlebee was NOT banned.
Bartlebee asked Faiz to cancel his account, which Faiz did per Bartlebees request. At no time was Bartlebee ever banned or threatened with being banned.
Only Bartlebee banned Bartlebee, because as I told you guys before, I would decide when it ends, not you. And I decided to end it today, and I stated that. Only you can’t see my comments because they were deleted when my account was deleted. Its as if I never existed, which is after all, what some of you wanted. Thus, I have granted your wish.
So while Pete thumps his chest and struts like a proud peacock, and the others mock and insult and slander a man who is no longer here to defend himself, nor are his words, just remember this.
I decided when it ended, not any of you, regardless of the lies of the braggarts like Pete, who bark like a strutting peacock at empty air.
I decided when it ended, and it ended here today.
So I thus for the last time, bid you my bragging, self congratulatory former opponents, good morning.
January 21st, 2008 at 8:37 amSo, bottom line, if you really cared abut Bartlebee you would have wanted to end this for Barts sake.
Comment by Fred — January 21, 2008 @ 12:40 am
Damn Fred. that hurt worse than anything Bart ever said to me.
As for you Bart, I read your last posts before they were deleted. You last words were “Free at Last” which I don’t fully understand considering there was never anyone or anything here which forced you post on TP. Its not as if you were somehow imprisoned by TP or its posters. You were always free.
And Holly, while I don’t think you are Bart, you have sullied your name. Your future comments will always be read with a Barlebee-tinged suspicion.
January 21st, 2008 at 9:48 amSo I thus for the last time, bid you my bragging, self congratulatory former opponents, good morning.
Comment by Holly
It is totally irrelivant whether bart was banned or left on his own. The quote at the beginning of this post says it all for me. Bart is in need of medical care Holly and if you are not Bart and you know him in real life then I reccommend that you do all you can to help Bart get the help he desperatly needs.
Bart has no opponants here. He is his own opponant. Until this incident I thought we were in this together for the most part against what I would consider collective opponants……bush supporters, etc.
January 21st, 2008 at 10:42 amthe reporter was right to call him on his hypocrisy regarding lobbyists… but I don’t think Mitt lost it here…
January 21st, 2008 at 11:01 amWhether or not The Romney replicant lost sight of its temper control protocols…
January 21st, 2008 at 11:40 amI would be happy if it did. Reporters can be obnoxious, and too much power has been ceded to them by public figures.
And I don’t think the press is too liberal, far from it.
As personified by Tim Russert, the arrogance of the press needs to be trimmed back.
They phrase the question “Isn’t it true that…” instead of “is it true that” making a queation an insinuation, placing the person on the defensive before they even respond.
They are no better than politicians – they are in business to create spin and controversy and horse races to sell papers and air time for “HEAD ON-APPLY DIRECTLY TO FOREHEAD”
It’s all a foul symbiosis and the reporters deserve no special treatment or special respect for their noble and hallowed profession. And candidates should be allowed free speech even if it is testy in tone.
This is a public service announcement from Bartlebee to Pete and anyone else boasting of getting Bartlebee banned.
This is NOT a message from the author of this comment, nor does the author of the comment in any way endorse or represent the content. This comment was written entirely by BARTLEBEE.
Bartlebee was NOT banned.
Bartlebee asked Faiz to cancel his account, which Faiz did per Bartlebees request. At no time was Bartlebee ever banned or threatened with being banned.
Only Bartlebee banned Bartlebee, because as I told you guys before, I would decide when it ends, not you. And I decided to end it today, and I stated that. Only you can’t see my comments because they were deleted when my account was deleted. Its as if I never existed, which is after all, what some of you wanted. Thus, I have granted your wish. And yet here you are, boasting how you got Bartlebee banned, which is a lie.
And now you claim its unimportant whether I left on my own or was banned, yet here you are, bragging about how you got me banned.
Which further demonstrates your collective comfort with dishonesty.
So while Pete thumps his chest and struts like a proud peacock, and the others mock and insult and slander a man who is no longer here to defend himself, nor are his words, just remember this.
I decided when it ended, not any of you, regardless of the lies of the braggarts like Pete, who bark like a strutting peacock at empty air.
I decided when it ended, and it ended when I decided, on my timetable, not yours. So enjoy bantering about how messed up Bartlebee is. After all, your pal who’s too afraid to admit the handle he debates me under, deleted them all, so as to cover up his embarrassment. Its what I’ve come to expect from you, as this story above, which is clearly misleading, talks volumes to your character, or lack thereof.
The high standard you clowns hold Fox news to somehow escapes your own code of conduct.
There are those of us out here who do not side with liars. Neither on the left, or the right. And you are liars, for promoting a story that is a lie, for your own political gain, which relegates ThinkProgress into nothing more than Think TABLOID.
And alas, for BARTLEBEE, it is thankfully become Think EGRESS.
So I thus, gladly and for the last and final time, bid you my boasting, bragging, self congratulatory truth challenged nimrods, good morning.
:|
oh….and in case I don’t see ya, good afternoon, good evening and goodnight.
BARTLEBEE
———–
January 21st, 2008 at 12:25 pmRomney didnt lose his cool, he kind of smirked and smiled and might have come across as somewhat condescending or a little sarcastic but in no way did he lose his cool. The premise that Romney getting CAUGHT lying was the same thing as him losing his cool borders on the riddiculous and shows some of you are grasping at straws, getting caught lying is no more losing your cool thasn getting caught speeding or soliciting a prostitute is and its slimy and misleading to imply otherwise.
Also saying something misleading about Romney on a liberal site does nothing to hurt Romney since the vast majority of left wingers who frequent this site would never vote for Romney anyway and the few Right Wingers that do visit here would never be influenced by that anyway. however while dishonesty like that wont serve to hurt Romney it can serve to hurt the credibility of TP and other left wing sites………..we SHOULDNT try and imitate Fox News or Karl Rove we should strive to be better than them and to be the side of truth, facts and integrity, rather than lies and slimy deceptions. Sure you might quibble that the article title was “Romney insists he never lost his cool”……..but thats misleading because he clearly didnt lose his cool he got caught spinning and or lying about an uncomfortable premise that clearly undermines his position and campaign.
January 21st, 2008 at 3:44 pmLosing his cool shouldnt have even been an issue because it never happened the issue is Mitt is guilty of hypocrisy and lying…….spinning and sensationalizing things only serves to diminish our credibility not his……and when he already diminished his own credibility by getting caught there was no need for us to do likewise and risk hurting our cause.
January 21st, 2008 at 3:49 pmComment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 12:25 pm
LIAR!
January 21st, 2008 at 4:02 pmComment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 3:49 pm
c’mon Bart, I thought you quit.
Now you’re going to channel yourself through mike831?
this is getting sad.
January 21st, 2008 at 4:13 pmI never wanted to see Bart gone. While I disagreed with him, I think he had the “right†to post whatever crazy talk he wanted to. I didn’t complain to Faiz. I didn’t e-mail TP.
Comment by dim wit — January 20, 2008 @ 10:55 pm
I did. Disagreement and trollish insults are one thing, but, out and out slander is quite different. Argue all you wish, but, unjustly calling someone a “liar†for holding a contrary opinion is inexcusable. I was able to live with him slandering me and was content to avoid TP comments. However, when he was mentioned on another site doing the same thing again with a fresh set of victims? I had no hesitation “dropping a dime on him†so to speak. And, if he returns to pull the same crap? I’ll do it again. And again.
G’night dw.
Comment by pete — January 21, 2008 @ 12:01 am
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse”
So you are calling me a liar like a slimy little troll just because i hold a different opinion.
Oh and BTW Dim Wit……………great name, i couldnt think of a more appropriate one………i’ll leave you dim wits with this the mark of a troll is someone who attacks the person rather than responding to what they said……..i see you two clowns couldnt refute what i actually said so you had to rresort to calling me a liar and claiming i’m someone else without offering a shred of proof to support your riddiculous “claims” like a typical Rovian repug would.
January 21st, 2008 at 4:32 pmComment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 4:32 pm
A brand new troll…just like the old troll…It’s BARTLEBEE or Michael or CT or Mighty AssOMighty or sEXXion or ???
Y’all,
IGNORE MIKE831 THE INSTANT TROLL!
January 21st, 2008 at 4:46 pmLook at the the little inbred troll calling me a liar and saying to ignore me because he is a liar who isnt intelligent enough to even TRY to refute or disprove my arguments.
In a democracy with real freedom of speech the best ideas and strongest arguments that are based in truth and facts win out………thats why ignorant little pricks like GWB, Rove and cheney and YOU try to smear and silence the opposition because their positions are based on lies and ignorance……………its laughable how you call ME a troll and a liar and piss and whine that others should ignore my points while you havent disproved or refuted ANY of them…….must really suck to be that afraid of someone that you have to whine to ban them or ignore them like a spoiled 9 year old brat.
January 21st, 2008 at 5:01 pmComment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 5:01 pm
IGNORED!
January 21st, 2008 at 5:16 pmComment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 5:01 pm
TROLL ALERT!
January 21st, 2008 at 5:19 pmComment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 5:01 pm
CLEANUP ON AISLE 666!
January 21st, 2008 at 5:23 pmHi mike831. Nice to meet you
January 21st, 2008 at 7:56 pmi see you two clowns couldnt refute what i actually said so you had to rresort to calling me a liar and claiming i’m someone else without offering a shred of proof to support your riddiculous “claims†like a typical Rovian repug would.
Comment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 4:32 pm
Welcome back Bartlebee. I don’t think I called you a liar – I believe my contention was that this post represented an opinion. You can either agree or disagree with the opinion, but that doesn’t make the opinion either true or false.
oh well. Enjoy your opinion.
January 21st, 2008 at 9:45 pmNice to meet you to dbadass!
January 21st, 2008 at 10:47 pmComment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 3:49 pm
c’mon Bart, I thought you quit.
Now you’re going to channel yourself through mike831?
this is getting sad.
Comment by dim wit — January 21, 2008 @ 4:13 pm”
Its not an “OPINION” Dim WIT…………..its the factual truth, you stated I was Bart without a shred of truth to support your lie and that inbred troll labeled me a “liar without a shred of evidence to support his delusional lie……………i realize it is difficult for people of your limited intelect to distinguish between the truth which is clearly supported by factual evidence and lies and mere opinions but that doesnt change the fact that it is evident to ANYONE else observing the thread who is credible and deals in facts and truth and who is the slimy liar who deals in slander, deceptions, inuendo and bogus ridduculous claims with no factual evidence to back up those claims……….you wanna act like Karl Rove your gonna get treated like Karl Rove little troll!
January 21st, 2008 at 10:55 pmOh and bTW DIM WIT you still havent refuted a goddamn thing i said……….better try harder Karl!
January 21st, 2008 at 10:57 pmDimwit said “You can either agree or disagree with the opinion, but that doesn’t make the opinion either true or false.”
Really so now your “claiming” that its your “opinion” that Romney lost his cool……….you cant ALMOST catch a train pal, either you do or you dont……….according to you if I claim the sky is polka dot or that you screw goats that would be my opinion and it would be neither true or false?
January 21st, 2008 at 11:46 pmKarl? Oh no… The Germans!!!!
January 21st, 2008 at 11:47 pmxxx
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:03 amI’ll bet your an atheist who thinks he can PROVE god doesnt exist Dimwit……….the self righteousness and blind faith are a dead giveaway.
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:04 amAccording to you, you could claim Romney is a child molestor because he gave a little girl a lolipop and that would be neither true nor false but your opinion………..sorry pal but claims have to be backed up by facts and reality or else they are smears and slanders.
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:30 amIt is very simple, if the truth means anything then;
If it was wrong when Lee Atwater and Karl Rove campaigned dishonestly, and had others telling untruths or twisting talking points and spin for them;
it is wrong when the we do it.
If we as progressives want to be “better” then they were, we HAVE to act like it.
January 22nd, 2008 at 1:41 amHey Clif, i see you made it into the land of the delusional trolls, who wouldnt know the truth or a fact if it bit them on their snouts.
January 22nd, 2008 at 1:53 amHey Dim Wit and Dixie Dunce, i’m just curious, how many alias’s do you clowns post under to give your lies and delusions more weight?
January 22nd, 2008 at 2:07 amHey Dim Wit and Dixie Dunce, i’m just curious, how many alias’s do you clowns post under to give your lies and delusions more weight?
Comment by mike831 — January 22, 2008 @ 2:07 am
Hey mike831/Bartlebee/clif/Holly/etc.,
I only post under one name. We’ve had this conversation before.
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:09 pmThere you go again, lying like a pathetic little punk, We’ve NEVER had this conversation before because untill yesterday I didnt know you even existed. Your also lying again that i’m Bart, Holly, Clif etc…..without a shred of proof to back up your pathetic lies and delusions………..you arent big on the facts, the truth or the evidence are you?
In fact I think you should see a psychologist because you seem to be suffering from paranoia and delusions that anyone who doesnt agree with you is this Bartlebe guy…..either that or Bart scares you so much you feel the NEED to lie to try to attack his credibility and/or drive off anyone who might agree with him because you KNOW your “ideas”, and twisted logic cant stand up to factual truths that are easily proven.
I am not Bartlbe, Clif, Holly or Anyone one else loser………….but I DO find it interesting that many different people would all independently conclude that you and Dixie Dunce are gutless punks using multipiple handles.
Unlike you I deal in facts and truth not lies you have not addressed nor refuted one thing I have said in here……….Like I said yesterday you cant defeat the message so you attack the messenger.
I seriously think you need professional help dude………..you seem to be obsessed with this Bartlebe Character.
January 22nd, 2008 at 5:42 pmAhhh. Its so refreshing to have you back.
So “mike831″ why do you speak as if you don’t know who Bartlebee is? You note in your last post “that anyone who doesnt agree with you is this Bartlebe guy” and then “you seem to be obsessed with this Bartlebe Character” yet post 761 is from Bartlebee (its signed by Bartlebee) but is listed as:
Comment by mike831 — January 21, 2008 @ 12:25 pm
So clearly you must know Bartlebee. Otherwise, is”this Bartlebe Character” posting under your handle without permission?
Curiously, your arguments also always seem to mirror Bartlebee’s arguments. Are you a Bartlebee protege? Maybe a “friend” or alterego of his? Either way you tried to distance yourself from him in the last post while exhibiting behavior in prior posts which suggest you know him.
And to think you call me delusional….
look, this post is getting inconvienent. so feel free to attack me in a more current post. I’ll read this post once more at the end of the day and then I’m not coming back – if you want to have the last word you can have it – I’ll read it, but won’t respond.
January 23rd, 2008 at 9:25 amDelusional sure seems to fit TROLL………there you go again lying and venturing in to the riddiculous to assign me a position that is in no way based in reality, fact or truth. your spinning like a top punk.
I NEVER ONCE stated I didnt know Bartlebe, what i did state is I am not him and since that is reality you seem to have a difficult time grasping that concept. I’ll make this REAL simple so even a Simple Simon like you can possibly grasp it…………..it would be utterly absurd for me to post a response for a person I didnt even know…………Yet that is your delusional position along with the completely contradictory fact that myself and several other distinct people ARE Bartlebe.
Your arguments are all over the place and quite incoherrent like a delusional schizophenic……….i’ll lerave you with this DIM WIT……..please either show a shred of proof that I either dont know Bart or that I am Bart or STFU and stock spewing lies like Karl Rove would.
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:21 pm