Mukasey: no special prosecutor for CIA tapes.
By on Jan 25th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
Mukasey: no special prosecutor for CIA tapes.
Attorney General Michael Mukasey today told reporters that “he doesn’t plan for a special prosecutor to investigate whether the CIA broke the law when it destroyed videotapes of terror interrogations, defying some in Congress who want an independent look” at the case. “Speaking tersely and in an even, low tone,” Mukasey refused to say “whether he has seen any evidence that destroying the interrogation tapes violated court orders or otherwise interfered with any case.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Corruption.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:20 pmThis could have been predicted.
∞
January 25th, 2008 at 1:23 pmthe troll at #2 has no idea what justaskin is saying about him when he’s not around…
January 25th, 2008 at 1:27 pmAnyone surprised? This clown will give the illusion of being the AG but he’s actually part of the bush/cheney gang and will not expose anyone in the administration to independent judicial review. We know which senators to again thank for chipping away at governmental accountability.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:30 pmOh, the irony…
January 25th, 2008 at 1:30 pmShould we tell him Fred? OK, I said that alphastupidityomega wasn’t fit to sleep with the pigs and justaskin said he was.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:31 pmMukasey is just another loyalist helping to sweep dirt under the rug.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:31 pmCorruption Personified in the form of Mukasey! Another “inside job”! I just hope the people remember the names and crimes of all of these charlatans and sleazebags to bring charges against them for “obstruction of justice” – and, yes, Muck-Muckasey, that means you!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:31 pmIt makes you think there’ll never be another Janet Reno who appoints a special prosecutor.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:32 pmjb: He wouldn’t have been nominated for the job unless he assured the Chimp that he’d cover his ass. Let’s be truthful here. We shouldn’t let american incredulity and a spiritual sense of altruism EVER cloud what our gut tells us and it’s been telling us that they’re all “in on it”.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:32 pmIt appears to me that the entire corporate media just got busted and the the entire charade of a Democracy and election process has been revealed to be a totally contrived, controlled and scripted sham, in that NBC had to have been in on the audio feed in the first place, botched it, then covered it up.
EVERY candidate is likely given a coach, and the entire thing is a fraud on the American People, with David Rockefeller’s CFR at the controls behind the curtain.
MSNBC blames Romney whisper on microphone malfunction
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/MSNBC_blames_Romney_whisper_on_microphone_0125.html
January 25th, 2008 at 1:33 pmShould we tell him Fred? OK, I said that alphastupidityomega wasn’t fit to sleep with the pigs and justaskin said he was.
Comment by Shayne
I liked the one where she said that she was much more intelligent than alpa……that we could be more real with him. I have a database started and I could probably post a link to it pretty easily.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:34 pmBush may become the first president to be impeached and sent to prison. Since day one, he’s done everything to cover his tracks and cover his ass. Unfortunately for him, more of his dirtywork has been outed and is yet to be outed before he’s able to run out of office. He may think that he wants another year in office; in actuality, the amount of dirt which will come out and totally blacken his name in history over the next year will do far more long-term damage to the Bush name than if he’s agree to leave because he’s hated and a lameduck. But then, his false sense of bravado always trumps his logic!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:34 pmI’m frankly a little surprised by this announcement.
Not for its naked disregard for truth and the rule of law, oh no no no — that’s to be expected.
No, what surprises me is that appointing a Special Prosecutor would give the administration the opportunity to claim that they can’t comment on an “ongoing investigation”.
But I guess they’re afraid they might unwittingly appoint another “renegade, out-of-control prosecutor” (i. e. one who respects the law) and the investigation might actually go somewhere.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:35 pmthey’re all “in on itâ€.
Comment by Veritas — January 25, 2008 @ 1:32 pm
This government needs a major house cleaning. Lets hope the Supreme Court Justices can hold on to retire under a Dem administration and Congress. I hope the voters have finally seen enough and will turn out the bums.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:36 pmMukasey refused to say “whether he has seen any evidence that destroying the interrogation tapes violated court orders or otherwise interfered with any case.â€
- – -
Mukasey reminds me of that monkey with his hands over his eyes:
“see no evil”
January 25th, 2008 at 1:38 pmkaty:
I think it may be time for you to republish your open letter to Barmaid Shayne; you know, the one telling her to stop acting like a 7th grader.
In the meantime, I’ll take your advice and ignore these “regular” trolls.
∞
January 25th, 2008 at 1:38 pmNo, what surprises me is that appointing a Special Prosecutor would give the administration the opportunity to claim that they can’t comment on an “ongoing investigationâ€.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama
They are not going to give a straight answer anyway Ralph…..they won’t even speak on record…..at a college….let alone in front of congress….
the trolls would say we are stalking them but I say that if they don’t have anything to hide………
January 25th, 2008 at 1:38 pm… just ANOTHER Bush laky ….
January 25th, 2008 at 1:39 pmplunger: The word IS getting out that our election system is a scam and our media is a sham. More people are cancelling their newspapers making the print media almost totally irrelevant; talk radio is becoming a thing of the past, and the television is only there for watching reality shows and good movies. I’d say the corporate whoring sycophants who call themselves “news media” played their last hand and lost.
http://www.bradblog.com and blackboxvoting.org will show you what a total scam our voting system currently IS and has been for the past two elections….you be the judge! But the evidence is now clear and nothing’s being done to protect our vote from hacking.
Paper ballots (ala hand counted style) is the ONLY WAY our votes will be counted properly. It’s the new “retro movement”! And why not since the paper ballots using a Diebold OptiScanner has been and will be easily hacked and unless a demand for a hand count of the paper behind it all takes place, these elections will still be hacked.
The reichwing nuts wet dream is having Hillary as their opponent so watch how they hack the various states to ensure their goal. They don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of standing up to Obama or Edwards or the combination of the two and they know it. They also are preparing the swiftboating ads about Foster’s death and WhiteWater right now and know that it will tank the Billary Candidacy.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:39 pmthat’s http://www.blackboxvoting.org – check it out to see how easily your voting machines are being hacked.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:40 pmAnd, of course, I left out Billary’s attendance at the AIPAC meetings!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:41 pmdimwit: The monkey Mukasey analogy is far too flattering for this old fart who can’t see past his own nose and is corrupt as the day is long.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:42 pmPaper ballots, hand count!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:43 pmThey also are preparing the swiftboating ads about Foster’s death and WhiteWater right now and know that it will tank the Billary Candidacy.
Comment by Veritas
I’ve been around a while Veritas…..I think the repubs are through for a while no matter what we send in……
January 25th, 2008 at 1:43 pmFred: But they’ll go to their graves trying – too much to lose for many rethugs.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:43 pmThe reichwing hates Hillary and yet all they’re doing these days is trying to push her up above Obama any chance they get. Do they really believe that the rest of the country doesn’t see what they’re doing?
January 25th, 2008 at 1:45 pmDon’t worry, once there’s a Democratic administration you’ll see Special Prosecutors being assigned every other week or so.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:45 pm25 I agree with that……they are scared and they should be
January 25th, 2008 at 1:46 pmPaper ballots, hand count!
Comment by jb — January 25, 2008 @ 1:43 pm
That’s all we have in my state, thank goodness. Not that it matters in the second reddest state in the union. *sigh*
January 25th, 2008 at 1:47 pmjb: You got it. We did it in Iraq to “ensure their democratic vote” so why not here? It’s the way it was done before the reichwing figured out how they could 1) mandate the use of touch screen machines by prostituting the handicap lobbies and 2) find a donor like Diebold who could “put in the fix” through their machines which were mandated for use by each state (along with two others). What a plan!! And, we all fell for it – hook, line, and sinker; after all, Diebold’s ATM’s seem to function properly, don’t they??
If we can ensure the vote of the Iraqi people to support our occupation, then we can damn well ensure the vote of our own people! We even had armed guards at the voting sites in Iraq to make sure everything was on the “up and up”….time to get “Retro” here! Demand HAND COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS now before it’s too late and the Repukes put in the fix on the 08 elections!
In ohio in 04, they ran their totals through a server in a bank building cellar in Tennessee (owned by the RNC) …. we can’t permit this to happen again.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:49 pmThe Bush administration will not be held accountable for their crimes until after they are removed from office.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:49 pmCLINTON / (Wesley) CLARK ‘08
∞
January 25th, 2008 at 1:49 pmIf the majority of americans had the evidence that their votes have been hacked by the Republicans in the elections of 2000 and 2004, they will be out in the streets!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:50 pmIf I were a criminal I would surely prefer I investigate myself than someone else.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:50 pmSo why dosesn’t your democrat controlled Congress appoint one? That’s what you voted them in to do isn’t it?
Comment by Gin
Would you care to show us the legal authority under which our Democratic congress can appoint a special prosecutor. I would love to see where you are getting that from.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:50 pmAnd a Republican president would never again occupy our white house for decades to come!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:50 pmBilbo: Obviously Gin hasn’t a clue about how government functions…no fool like a troll fool!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:50 pmCLINTON / (Wesley) CLARK ‘08
∞
Comment by alphainfinityomega — January 25, 2008 @ 1:49 pm
I understand Clark, he seems like a good guy, but why Clinton?
January 25th, 2008 at 1:51 pmSo why dosesn’t your democrat controlled Congress appoint one? That’s what you voted them in to do isn’t it?
Comment by Gin
So Gin, if the Bush Administration has done nothing wrong, why are they afraid of having a Special Prosecutor appointed? Bill Clinton allowed his Attorney General to appoint a Special Prosecutor whom he knew was going to be investigating him. Bill Clinton showed he had integrity as the President whereas Bush has done nothing but show that he is a criminal.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:52 pmMoo-Cow-ski: traitor to America, traitor to the Bill of Rights, traitor to the Constitution, but loyal to the lying, election-stealing, torturing Bush gangster regime…
January 25th, 2008 at 1:53 pmwas there ever any doubt that murkasey would not hire an independent prosecutor? I think not. With an independent prosecutor, murkasey wouldn’t be able to suppress the truth and the bush/cheney regime could never tolerate the American people to know the truth about their actions.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:53 pm.
30
January 25th, 2008 at 1:53 pmthis troll thinks congress can appoint a special prosecutor…….interestingly dumb…..
lefty: Just like the Big Pharma scan on Business Week this week about Lipitor, we now find that 8 of the 9 people reviewing these bogus studies had a “vested interest” in the company producing the drug. Now they’ve found that women don’t benefit from statins AT ALL and that men over 65 have no cardiac benefits from these drugs. Amazing since every senior I know is on a cholesterol drug.
Notice how these drug companies are quaking? Jarvic’s ad for Lipitor has been running non stop and Merck has been taking out full page ads for their drugs in every newspaper. It’s OVER FOR THIS CHARADE.
Imagine this: If you doc called you into his office and told you that you could spend thousands of dollars on a cholesterol drug (which may lower cholesterol but the studies have not shown that cholesterol numbers mean anything related to heart disease) that does nothing for women of ANY AGE and nothing for men over 65, would you take it??? Shit no!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:54 pm#2,
I’m pretty sure it was.
Given the overwhelming evidence of the stuffing of the DOJ with not just political cronies intent on turning Justice into a wholly owned subsidiary of the GOP and its business investors but also religious conservatives intent on turning secular law into religious law, at all levels of the department, and the record of Bush presenting only those two types of candidate for such appointments I was baffled ( yet sadly not surprised) that the Dems accepted Mukasey as Gonzalez’s replacement. The problem was just with the DOJ’s leader but with the institution as a whole.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:55 pmIt was clear from his testimony that Mukasey was never going to ‘reform’ the DOJ in the slightest but apparently the Democrats chose optimism and generosity of faith over reason.
IMHO I don’t understand why the AG postion had to be filled so urgently–the competent professional staff of the DOJ might have been relieved of interference and the incompetent cronies/insurgents would have been leaderless. Along with the state of things in Congress–the priorites and balance of power) the AG postion could have been frankly been left open ( not sure iof that would have been actually legal)–or at least left undecided for a while.
Instead sod all has changed and real justice and professionalism in the DOJ has been definitvely delayed until 2009.
Who the heck is Mukasey anyway? A loyal subject of the King, or an employee of the American people?
January 25th, 2008 at 1:55 pmScrew him.
Shocking!! Just Shocking!! oh, wait. no it’s not. nevermind.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:55 pm“Nothing to see here, move along, move along….”
And aeternal damnation and calumny on those stoopid “Democratic” Senators that approved this guy…..
Cheers,
January 25th, 2008 at 1:55 pmComment by Zooey — January 25, 2008 @ 1:51 pm
Zoo, I’m probably not telling you anything you don’t already know, but the consensus is that this alphabet character is a particularly insincere troll who pretends to be a progressive, then attacks TP regulars. It appears to have a familiarity with TP regulars much longer than its visible tenure as a commenter.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:56 pmMore Bush Loyalty Oath signer cover ups?
Go figure, and just why is Murkasey in the AG spot anyway, it now appears that he is unqualified for the job…
Oh, forgot, he’s a Bushie and Bushies don’t need no stinking laws or stinking badges for that matter.
Buck Fush
January 25th, 2008 at 1:56 pmMusk Rat was put in the job to stall any indictments against his bosses. Musk Rat knows the crimes have been committed but like Gonzales before him, he must do as he’s told by the White House. We have no Justice System in the US today. Nothing has changed used the names the crimes will continue as always. Musk Rat was once an honest Judge/lawyer but he made a deal with the Devil and sold his soul for the money. Musk Rat will keep things going until we have a new President.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:56 pmWe need to give the fascist the “heave” and recover our country from their clutches – Big Oil, Big Pharma and Big Insurance. That’s why John Edwards makes the most sense. He’s got the political gravitas to get the job done. Billary is in their camp and Obama doesn’t have the clout.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:56 pmMukasey’s no better than Gonzo. He’s just the older fart edition.
January 25th, 2008 at 1:57 pmPosts by Zuch: Nothing to see here…..cheers! Don’t let the internet door slap you in the a$$ on your way out, Zuch!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:58 pmZuch: Be that as it may, it’s the Republican senator scumbags in the majority so let’s call a spade a spade here…Cheerio!
January 25th, 2008 at 1:59 pmTP: I hope to see something on the Lipitor scam soon. It’s gracing the cover of Business Week and the horse is now out of the stall. Can we get something on this soon? Thx.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:00 pmbut why Clinton?
Comment by Zooey — January 25, 2008 @ 1:51 pm
Because she can win.
The right wing will decimate Obama.
They are only going easy on him now because they want Hillary defeated.
Anything they throw at Hillary will roll right off, she’s already been through the right wing grinder.
∞
January 25th, 2008 at 2:00 pmDoes anybody notice the silence of Senators Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein when it comes to AG Mukasey. !!
Gonzalez was a daily target of Schumer.
I wonder why?!!
January 25th, 2008 at 2:00 pmOK, we’ll wait until Feb 09, then we’ll see about appointing a special prosecutor…
January 25th, 2008 at 2:02 pmI hope the next president doesn’t give these asscolonics a pass on their lawbreaking…
RALPH
The question is – who are you? LOL
∞
January 25th, 2008 at 2:05 pmIf the majority of americans had the evidence that their votes have been hacked by the Republicans in the elections of 2000 and 2004, they will be out in the streets!
Comment by Veritas — January 25, 2008 @ 1:50 pm
Let’s not forget about all the non-technical ways to rig an election: caging lists, “disappearing” provisional ballots, dumping of broken voting machines in minority districts, opening too fewpolling centers in minority districts, and voter intimidation. These were all used in 2000 and 2004.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:05 pmWell Feingold…how did that plan to send his nomination to the Senate floor work for you? I can tell you how it worked for the US citizens! Vote against the incumbent across the board!!!!!!!!!!!
January 25th, 2008 at 2:06 pm30
this troll thinks congress can appoint a special prosecutor…….interestingly dumb…..
Comment by Fred
Well, goon_golly thought that Edwards was a sitting Senator. Don’t expect much out of our trolls and we won’t be disappointed because they are a particularly dumb lot.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:07 pmAnything they throw at Hillary will roll right off, she’s already been through the right wing grinder.
∞
Comment by alphainfinityomega — January 25, 2008 @ 2:00 pm
It’s your thinking that if Obama gets the nomination, the gloves will come off, and we’ll have 4-8 years of Republican scum?
You could be right. I imagine the right is holding off on Obama until the nominations are in. Pretty sad, actually.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:08 pmLet me see if I have this straight, the department investigating the CIA tapes as its #1 man who can’t decide if waterboarding is torture and #2 man (Bradbury) who has shown his predjudice by issuing opinions that justify the CIA “harsh interrogagion” ????????
January 25th, 2008 at 2:09 pmthis troll thinks congress can appoint a special prosecutor…….interestingly dumb…..
Comment by Fred
Well, goon_golly thought that Edwards was a sitting Senator. Don’t expect much out of our trolls and we won’t be disappointed because they are a particularly dumb lot.
Comment by bilbobaggins
gg was trying to pass the easter egg preacher(plagerized from juan) as credible earlier today…..what a maroon.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:11 pmWhere did gin go? Typical neoCON troll. Proven wrong and they scuttle back under their bridges.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:12 pmMukasey refused to say “whether he has seen any evidence that destroying the interrogation tapes violated court orders or otherwise interfered with any case.â€
U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy ordered Justice Department lawyers to appear before him Friday at 11 a.m. to discuss whether destroying the tapes, which showed two al Qaeda suspects being questioned, violated a court order. (That was on 12/18/2007)
January 25th, 2008 at 2:14 pmWhere did gin go? Typical neoCON troll. Proven wrong and they scuttle back under their bridges.
Comment by bilbobaggins — January 25, 2008 @ 2:12 pm
The REAL hardcore trolls like Gin can’t stand sunlight for more than a few minutes at a time.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:22 pm# 63 Zooey:
Yep.
Hillary can (and will) win.
But any of the Dems. are preferable to the Repub. candidates.
They have a much better chance of beating Obama; why else would Rove be giving him advice?
Clinton / Clark ‘08
January 25th, 2008 at 2:24 pmI thought Mukasy was supposed to have integrity. Just another Gonzalez.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:25 pmbut….but….but Clinton got a BJ. Quick! Appoint a special prosecutor! Convene impeachment hearings!
oh, wait, already done that.
January 25th, 2008 at 2:29 pm#53 Veritas:
Posts by Zuch: Nothing to see here…..cheers! Don’t let the internet door slap you in the a$$ on your way out, Zuch!
Can it, m’kay? Don’t know what’s bothering you, but maybe you need to tune up the Sarcasm-o-Meter™ a bit.
Cheers,
January 25th, 2008 at 2:33 pm#61 billyjoejimbob What does Feingold have to do with this? Don’t you mean Feinstein?
January 25th, 2008 at 2:35 pm#54: Veritas:
Zuch: Be that as it may, it’s the Republican senator scumbags in the majority so let’s call a spade a spade here…Cheerio!
True, but we didn’t vote for them. We can expect horrible behaviour from the Rethugs (and we can expect them to circle the wagons for whatever vile machinations might help save their sorry a$$es from the butt-kicking that’s deservedly coming, we hope), but why shoudl we put up with ‘Democrats’ knuckling under to (or actively abetting) the Dubya regime?!?!?
Cheers,
January 25th, 2008 at 2:38 pmMukasey still can’t define ‘troture…’
January 25th, 2008 at 2:54 pmI think it may be time for you to republish your open letter to Barmaid Shayne; you know, the one telling her to stop acting like a 7th grader.
Comment by alphainfinityomega
Mommy, mommy, the regulars are bashing me.
January 25th, 2008 at 3:09 pm# 31 Veritas, you are right on the money. Florida , Ohio and new Mexico were stolen, not only by machine, but by disqualifying many voters who couldn’t produce their birth certificates, and by giving ‘provisional’ ballots in order to a) pacify them or b) shorten the waiting ( 2006 Toledo 1-3-machines were removed which made the wait hours long). Provisional ballots were universally rejected.
January 25th, 2008 at 3:28 pmEven if we win, we’ll lose.
able as
Comment by alphainfinityomega
Mommy, mommy, the regulars are bashing me.
Comment by Juan C. — January 25, 2008 @ 3:09 pm
They are such infants our trolls, aren’t they Juan?
January 25th, 2008 at 3:36 pmAm I the only one who doesn’t care what the CIA does? I just feel, that, what they do foreignly should be taken as is. However, I don’t think it’s the CIA’s place to be digging around for terrorists though. I think they should leave that up to the military, FBI, and/or whoever. I just think the CIA should stick to preventing wars, assassinating whoever, taking down corrupt countries, etc. Call me a Republican, conservative, and right winger, I could care less.
January 25th, 2008 at 3:45 pmSo why dosesn’t your democrat controlled Congress appoint one? That’s what you voted them in to do isn’t it?
Comment by Gin — January 25, 2008 @ 1:48 pm
Since when is the congress controlled by democrats? Your republiscum traitors won’t let a thing get done that doesn’t protect them from the law of the land. You haven’t been paying much attention, as usual.
January 25th, 2008 at 4:26 pmCall me a Republican, conservative, and right winger, I could care less.
Comment by zol — January 25, 2008 @ 3:45 pm
OK.
January 25th, 2008 at 4:27 pmAbout Congress appointing a special investigator, I’ll have to side with the minority here – I don’t know of anything that expressly forbids that. And if the dems are going to make any headway, they’re going to start having to start pushing the envelope as the WH pushes things so far in the other direction.
Of course, the WH can try to hide items under executive priviledge – but perhaps a few sworn depositions may start unraveling the pile of spaghetti.
January 25th, 2008 at 4:53 pm.
Q U E S T I O N:
Who signed the arrest warrant of Jose Padilla?
What evidence was the warrant based on?
ANSWER:
Mukasey and erased tapes.
THAT is the reason he refuses to proceed with an investigation.
.
January 25th, 2008 at 5:05 pmOf course Mukasey would do this… Jews thrive on torturing Arabs.
January 25th, 2008 at 5:07 pmThe reichwing nuts wet dream is having Hillary as their opponent so watch how they hack the various states to ensure their goal.
Comment by Veritas
Wrong. Hillary is their “wet dream” because she’s a Neocon at heart.
January 25th, 2008 at 5:11 pmWhat part of hired particularly or employed generally by different branches of the government is confusing to you?
Why doesn’t the democrat controlled Congress hire a special prosecutor if they think they have a case?
Comment by Gin
Congress: The United States Constitution vests all legislative power to and in the Congress.
Legislative power means “pass laws”.
Do you want to explain exactly how the Democrats would be able to hire a Special Prosecutor? Do you think they could pass a law to hire a Spacial Prosecutor? Even if they could do that, which I doubt, the Republiscums wouldn’t let them get away with it.
So, since you think you are so smart, exactly how would Congress appoint a Special Prosecutor?
January 25th, 2008 at 6:46 pmSen. Chuck “The Schmuk” Shumer (D-NY) brought us this DISASTER!!! Thanks for nothing you useless DemoRAT!!
Chuck is a SELL OUT!!!
January 25th, 2008 at 8:13 pmMukasey is as bad as his predessecor. Just another corrupted criminal. Like Bush… Like Pelosi… Like Chenney… Like Rice… Like….
January 26th, 2008 at 1:40 am