Think Progress

Right Wing Attacks Khalilzad For Not Defending Bolton’s Honor: ‘A Lack Of Testicular Fortitude’»

khalLast Saturday, Zalmay Khalilzad, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, participated in a panel discussion on Iranian foreign policy with two high-ranking Iranian officials at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The New York Times reports that the White House and Condoleezza Rice were “angered” by Khalilzad’s move because he did not receive explicit authorization. (Watch video of the event here.)

The moderator of the forum joked that Khalilzad has a “really formidable advantage of having a name that is not John Bolton.” Because Khalilzad let that comment stand without repudiating it, right-wing bloggers have erupted in full rage that Khalilzad did not jump to defend Bolton’s honor (as they surely would have). Thus, Khalilzad’s behavior was “disgusting,” “an insult to the United States” and showed “a lack of testicular fortitude”:

Powerline: “The moderator begins the panel with an insult to former United States Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton. Rice is apparently angry that Khalilzad participated in the panel without administration authorization. I am angry that Khalilzad participated after the insult to his predecessor in office. Disgusting.

Captain’s Quarters: “The moderator noted in his effusive introduction of Khalilzad that among his outstanding qualities was “the further, really formidable advantage of having a name that is not John Bolton.” Regardless of whether Khalilzad had prior authorization, allowing the insult to Bolton to stand unchallenged represents an insult to the United States and a lack of testicular fortitude on the part of his replacement.

During the panel discussion, Khalilzad “did not veer from the U.S. position” and “stuck to the administration playbook” during the entire event.

So, despite the fact that Khalilzad adhered to the Bush administration line on Iran during the discussion, the right-wing bloggers found it reprehensible that an American official would have the temerity to sit in the same room with an Iranian official and let a mild dig at John Bolton go undefended.

UPDATE: Newshoggers writes, “Poor Zalmay. He’s been a loyal neocon for years and they lauded him for his work in Afghanistan and Iraq when he was up for the UN post. … But let a slur on the Almighty Moustache slide and he’s neocon toast.”

Digg It!

62







Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

62 Responses to “Right Wing Attacks Khalilzad For Not Defending Bolton’s Honor: ‘A Lack Of Testicular Fortitude’”


  1. Fan of Man Says:

    hell, these same a$$holes are the ones that are foaming at the mouth for war but won’t dare enlist.


  2. po Says:

    Truth hurts, don’t it. Those in attendance understood the joke. And one of the best things going for the US at the moment is that John Bolton is no longer Ambassador to the UN. I can only hope that the first words out of the next Commander in Chief’s mouth are something akin to our long national nightmare is ending.


  3. fletc3her Says:

    John Bolton is mad and John Bolton’s mustache is really mad. You don’t want to see John Bolton’s mustache when it’s angry!


  4. Democrat Soldier Says:

    I just love it when the neo-cons “eat their own”!

    Infighting on the side of the ultra-radical right-whiners is nothing but fantastic news for average Americans!


  5. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Well, surely this is justification for bombing Iran back into the Stone Age, right? Right? Common, back me up here, guys… right?


  6. leftcoast Says:

    I’m sure a cell is being prepared at GITMO.


  7. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Of course, that photo begs the question, what was Zalmay talking about when he made that gesture?


  8. MrBlueSky Says:

    Who cares what the lame duck thinks (and the righties think too)?

    They are on their way out of power to many long years of minority status (where they belong!)

    For once, the UN Ambassador from the US is doing what the vast majority of Americans want him to do.

    “To jaw jaw is better than to war war.”


  9. katy Says:

    it was an insult to john bolton only, and deserved…

    well played, mr. khaliazad.


  10. CitiDC Says:

    How could the Right support him?

    Khalilizad is a Muslim. And Muslim = Terra-ist.


  11. galmud Says:

    I’m angry Rice hasnt apolgized for her predecessors lies in the UN security council insulting the entire world. Disgusting.


  12. Fred Says:

    John Bolton went to the UN with the explicit purpose of offending everyone there. He succeded in a grand way. His distain for the UN is known by all. Fortunatly, most there understand that these people are on their way out……thank god and not a moment too soon.


  13. Zooey Says:

    **yawn**

    These people attacked a child over S-CHIP, but jump to defend the honor Bolton’s mustache.


  14. Buckie Boy Says:

    He rightfully ignored it knowing full well what a POS Walrus-boy is.

    And really should anyone with any morals really care what the FK Rice says.

    Buck Fush


  15. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    Yes, I can understand why the wingnuts are disappointed in Khalilzad’s performance.

    After all, what good is a diplomat who won’t immediately get in the face of someone on the other side of a table who makes a joke? I mean, really — who needs a diplomat who will try to, y’know, work with others?


  16. GSD Says:

    Pam Oshry of Atlas Shruggs for UN Ambassador!

    -GSD


  17. leftcoast Says:

    Edwards to speak about dropping out of race in a moment.


  18. missmolly Says:

    Two questions –

    1) What “honor” does Bolton have that’s worth defending?

    2) Why does the right wing tend to make everything have to do with genitalia?


  19. PatrioticLiberalChristian Says:

    Hey, Mr. Bolton, you’ve got a little Khalilzad crumb on your moustache.


  20. Evil Spaniard Says:

    But Mr. Bolton is only a private citizen now, isn’t? And really never was confirmed as UN embassador. What’s the problem then? They were jocking about a private citizen who has never been an official embassador.

    Too bad, neoconnies, all the world knew that.


  21. oldtree Says:

    Why do eunuch’s that volunteer to have them removed talk the most about testicles?


  22. tom Says:

    I can hardly wait for the reaction from these knee-jerk, ditto-head neo-cons when President Obama is introduced before his first speech to the U.N. and it is noted that among his positive qualities is “the further, really formidable advantage of having a name that is not George Bu$h.”


  23. ForTruth Says:

    Size does matter.


  24. nitpicker Says:

    They should have known this about the guy. When he was in Afghanistan, Khalilzad was always showing up at events acting like the Americans–and, in many cases, he personally–was responsible for whatever good news was being covered. In many cases, we’d had nothing to do with it. By putting an American face on event, Khalilzad was actually working against our best interests, which were to show a strong, functioning government working for its people.


  25. Evil Spaniard Says:

    Comment by tom — January 30, 2008 @ 1:08 pm

    “Clinton did it”.


  26. Roket Says:

    Bolton is mad alright. Not the angry kind of mad either. The psycho babble kind. As in loony toon.


  27. Fred Says:

    23 they are going to be really offended at a lot of things like that….I am going to enjoy it as much as they enjoy the sound of human beings screaming…


  28. Evil Spaniard Says:

    Comment by Zooey — January 30, 2008 @ 1:03 pm

    Hi, Zooey :)


  29. BillinChicago Says:

    John Bolton needs to go back to doing the only thing he’s any good at . . . being everybody’s favorite gimp at Plato’s Retreat.


  30. A Patriot Acting Says:

    I guess there won’t be any more mustache rides for Khalilzad. Jeez, the guy actually does something “diplomatic” while carrying the Administration’s tainted water and they dog-pile all over him. And Condi’s pissed that he didn’t storm out of the conference. Classic!


  31. Loonie Says:

    “John R. Bolton” and “honor” in the same sentence. Bizarre.


  32. Miles Tougeaux Says:

    Why do we assume the moderator was joking?


  33. Zooey Says:

    Comment by Evil Spaniard — January 30, 2008 @ 1:16 pm

    Hello, Senor Evil. :)


  34. Uncle Ho Says:

    I find it utterly amazing that the foaming-at-the-mouth warmongers who talk about the lack of testicular fortitude’ of others suddenly lose their own(if they ever had any to begin with) when it comes to joining the army themselves to put their bodies where their mouths are.


  35. po Says:

    We assume the moderator was at least half-joking because he laughed when he said it. One of the Righties has a full clip up. The moderator laughs as does the audience. Seems to me, that’s the truly telling part of the whole affair — a room full of foreigners laughing at the person who was the de facto mouthpiece for Cheney’s foreign policy. Heckuva job, Johnny.


  36. GSD Says:

    How dare ZalBama KhalilBinLaden insult Dearest John Bolton, The bravest most strongest scambassador ever!

    -GSD


  37. Uncle Ho Says:

    comment by missmolly @ 1:05 pm

    I guess their preoccupation about size is due to their own deficiencies.


  38. Juan C. Says:

    represents an insult to the United States and a lack of testicular fortitude on the part of his replacement.”

    So that’s the organ you use when you defend someone?

    I thought it was the brain.


  39. Wayne A. Schneider Says:

    John Bolton was nothing more than just another one of Bush’s Rejected Recess Appointments. And he was rejected by the Senate because he was a terrible diplomat! And everybody on the planet knows that John Bolton was one of the most undiplomatic people in the world! (Yes, at times, even the “World’s Worst Person in the World!”)

    I wouldn’t have defended John Bolton if they insinuated he was a child molester! I would have simply said, “Everyone’s entitled to their opinion.” That’s how the neo-cons defend their inhuman views.


  40. Leporello Says:

    And what, precisely was he supposed to do in response to the ‘insult’? Challenge the moderator to a duel to the death? Rip off his shirt and attack the moderator with a steel chair? Its amazing to hear the locic and rationale defying rhetoric coming from the neocons. If only they took threats to the Constitution as seriously as they do to one of their real icons.
    Impeach Cheney and Bush and Save the Constitution.


  41. Veritas Says:

    Doing something without the blessings of the Dictator is problematic, eh? They’d better get used to it.


  42. Veritas Says:

    Now John Bolton and Captain Kangaroo in the same sentence might make some sense.


  43. Keltoi Says:

    Tempest in a Teapot. Someone made a joke, big whup.

    What I don’t get is why TP cares what is said on “right wing blogs”


  44. VerbalKint Says:

    Further proof that the Powerline guys are Bush bootlicking idiots. I recall that Powerline was one of the right wing blogs that a White House memo identified as publishing whatever they were told to publish by the White House.


  45. A Patriot Acting Says:

    What I don’t get is why anybody cares what Keltoi says on TP.

    Fixed it for ya’


  46. katy Says:

    I can hardly wait for the reaction from these knee-jerk, ditto-head neo-cons when President Obama is introduced …
    Comment by tom — January 30, 2008 @ 1:08 pm

    yea… i wonder if my ditto-head-in-law will replace his
    “I Stand Behind President GWB (or some such)” bumper sticker with
    “I Stand Behind President BARACK OBAMA”

    ah hahahaha! … aaahhhh… … no i don’t…

    can’t wait to find the appropriate thread to copy/paste his latest screed…
    yer gonna luv it…


  47. republicans hate facts Says:

    Tempest in a Teapot. Someone made a joke, big whup.
    What I don’t get is why TP cares what is said on “right wing blogs”
    Comment by Keltoi — January 30, 2008 @ 1:45 pm

    Typical Hypocritical WINGNUT. What YOU DON’T GET is WHY YOU CARE what’s posted on a PROGRESSIVE BLOG enough to BE HERE ANNOYING EVERYONE while WHINING why you don’t understand why people care what’s on a RIGHT WING BLOG. KillMoron.


  48. Wayne A. Schneider Says:

    What the right-wing posts on their blogs matters because too many people believe what they read there to be based on facts, which is highly unlikely. The Right Wing tends to treat its ideology as fact (which it isn’t), and is even willing to send good men and women to their deaths based on those falsehoods. We like to know what our moronic fellow citizens (the ones who believe the Right Wing blogs) are being told so we can better prepare them for the truth. And John Bolton was one of the worst people to ever be chosen as an unconfirmed UN Ambassador.


  49. dim wit Says:

    Tempest in a Teapot. Someone made a joke, big whup.

    What I don’t get is why TP cares what is said on “right wing blogs”

    Comment by Keltoi — January 30, 2008 @ 1:45 pm

    Oh, the sheer irony, is just unbelievable.

    Your comment just begs the question: “why do you care what TP puts on their post?”


  50. Keltoi Says:

    Your comment just begs the question: “why do you care what TP puts on their post?”

    Comment by dim wit — January 30, 2008 @ 2:00 pm

    Um…I like reading the threads and posting to them?


  51. Uncle Ho Says:

    comment by Veritas @ 1:44 pm

    Don’t go insulting Captain Kangaroo. He was a bona fide war hero. Iwo Jima.


  52. dim wit Says:

    Um…I like reading the threads and posting to them?

    Comment by Keltoi — January 30, 2008 @ 2:03 pm

    Well there you go. TP likes reading right wing blogs and putting snipets on their blog so that all of us can read and comment upon them.


  53. Zimzone Says:

    John Bolton is to diplomacy what Michael Bolton was to music.

    And just for the record, Bolton was never the Ambassador to the U.N.

    He was an interim appointment, done under cover of congressional absence on a dark rainy night in the Cheney Horror House.

    And he was NEVER confirmed…


  54. Keltoi Says:

    Well there you go. TP likes reading right wing blogs and putting snipets on their blog so that all of us can read and comment upon them.

    Comment by dim wit — January 30, 2008 @ 2:06 pm

    K.


  55. dim wit Says:

    Comment by Keltoi — January 30, 2008 @ 2:17 pm

    dw


  56. nofltwlt Says:

    Rice will not stand up for women gang raped by KBR or Valarie Plame a highly valuable secret agents outed by Bush/Cheney, but she will stand up for a scum-bag like Bolton.

    Maybe she would feel differently if KBR got their hands on her.


  57. NoMoreBush Says:

    I can see the feigned outrage of right wingnuttia is alive and well. They have to justify their existence by some new outrage everyday.


  58. bilbobaggins Says:

    So, despite the fact that Khalilzad adhered to the Bush administration line on Iran during the discussion, the right-wing bloggers found it reprehensible that an American official would have the temerity to sit in the same room with an Iranian official and let a mild dig at John Bolton go undefended.

    If you are not a good lock-stepping brownshirt to the neoCONs, you are against them. It comes from the “your’re either with us of against us” mentality. This is part of the reason why the the Republiscum party is in such disarray. Too bad they can’t see it.f


  59. bilbobaggins Says:

    Um…I like reading the threads and posting to them?
    Comment by Keltoi

    Loon troll Keltoi thinks that the left shouldn’t care what the right wingers post on their blogs in yet he spends an inordinate amount of time here on TP, the left wing blog that he loves to hate. Loon Keltoi doesn’t explain why he is keeping an eye on a left wing blog but TP shouldn’t be keeping an eye on right wing logs.

    Irony is certainly lost on this troll tool fool.


  60. Arn Gunnutes Says:

    Bolton is a COXUCKER punk TRAITOR to the USA.

    Just like MURDERER Bush.

    I hope a soldier wounded permanently in Iraq because of the LIES of Bolton and Bush

    does Bolton in…


  61. FearandSmear Says:

    Tough sh**. Bolton is an international joke and a buffoon.

    His presence in that position was one big FU to the UN and by proxy the world at large.

    Typical of these cat turds, they cry and whine and play victim when someone calls them on their own arrogance.

    COWBOY UP, you quivering-lipped sissies.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
image
View Most Popular
image
image
Visit Our Affiliated Site
image
image image
What We're About
image
image
Featured
image
image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



image
image
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



image
Reports
image
image
imageTopic Cloud
image

image
imageArchives
image

image
imageBlog Roll
image

imageAbout Think ProgressimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage