On Fox News Sunday today, the Fox “all stars” discussed the possibility of Hillary Clinton being chosen as a vice president. Bill Kristol argued that Clinton would not be a valuable vice presidential pick because she lacks support beyond the “Democratic establishment and white women.” The “establishment” can be ignored, Kristol argued, but “white women are a problem.” He added, “But we all live with them.” “Not me,” said Juan Williams. Brit Hume chimed in, “For the record, I like white women.” “I know, I shouldn’t have said that,” Kristol concluded. Watch it:
Keep it up, guys.
February 3rd, 2008 at 11:59 amYou look like the fools you are.
There’s a lot of things you should have never said, Kristol. This is only one. But thanks again for demonstrating your bone-crushing stupidity for all to see.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:00 pmMore from the Comic bigots….”Not me”..Juan Williams…lololol.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:12 pmMouth meet foot…tasty toes.
Fascist bigots just can’t engage mind before mouth.
Buck Fush
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:13 pmHume and Kristol.. what contemptible asses. How does anyone else sit at the same table with those pigs?
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:14 pmBrit Hume chimed in, “Where all the white women at?â€
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:14 pmThe misogynist reich-wing is in full swing on Super Bowl Sunday.
Comment by Dr. Matt — February 3, 2008 @ 12:13 pm
They can all get drunk and beat up their wives.
BTW, who is playing in “Super American Standard?”
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:16 pmMethinks Hume protesteth too much.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:18 pmShit Fume emits more gas.
Is Juan Williams a POW?
-GSD
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:19 pmWhat does Bill Kritol know about “white women”?
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:22 pmAnd the Fixed Noise hits just keep on a-coming.
Prepare for more of this horse shit from the “best” Fox Opinion Channel has to offer as the general election nears. Remember, THIS IS THE BEST THEY CAN DO- PREPARE FOR KKKARL ROVE’S BILGE ON THE FOLLOWUP…
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:24 pmGood god…it’s like listening in on the conversation inside a junior high boy’s locker room.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:24 pmBTW, who is playing in “Super American Standard?â€
Comment by Brain From Planet Arous
I think it’s the Yankees and the Bulls.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:24 pmWhat an incoherent rant. It goes without saying these fratboys are worth millions of bucks a year. Fox knows how to retain its talent.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:28 pmI think it’s the Yankees and the Bulls.
Comment by Nevar — February 3, 2008 @ 12:24 pm
Thanks for the clarification.
I thought it was the Rams and the Oilers.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:35 pmBTW, while I know it’s still too early for the results, I have to applaud progressives around the nation for its efforts to derail the clinton election machine. This country doesn’t need another 4-8 years of triangulating politics, or giving republicans the benefit of every deal.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:36 pmThis is really to much information as now these guys are coming out of the closet. As for woman well we’re sister regardless of color but if you don’t like woman then you must prefer men. As for Brit Hume he had to speak up as he got his job because his wife gave it to him. With Mrs. Hume, Brit would be jobless. Right Brit you don’t bite the hand that feeds you. Now these sickos should join up with Tweety and O’Reilly. That would be a comedy show with the highest ratings.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:42 pmAll the idiots, racist, woman haters and closet people all together to air their sick views representing their Republican Party. Maybe Ann would join in too.
I wonder what Laura Bush thinks of the comment about White woman isn’t she white?
McWars, ask yourself can Obama handle the republicans? I have my doubts.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:42 pmMcWars, ask yourself can Obama handle the republicans? I have my doubts.
Comment by wisedup — February 3, 2008 @ 12:42 pm
I think he can. I think he can peel off a good portion of the evangelical vote that’s currently going to the Republicans.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:44 pm…“efforts to derail the clinton election machine.”
Comment by McWars
It won’t work, though; This Fox noise machine and hate radio, along with false flag terrorism, would decimate Obama’s chances.
Clinton / Clark ‘08
A∞Ω
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:50 pmMcWars, ask yourself can Obama handle the republicans? I have my doubts.
Comment by wisedup — February 3, 2008 @ 12:42 pm
I mentioned to a big Obama supporter two things:
1 – His saying Reagan brought the country together
2 – His cozy relationship with AIPAC.
His answers were (1) On he didn’t say that, he meant Reagan was a great communicator. This is out of the mouth of a so-called “liberal”. Reagan, who started this free market insanity, busted Unions, Iran-Contra, and favored the rich. And (2) He said, “Obama will pull the rug out from AIPAC when he gets in”. This is Naive beyond description. EVERY candidate that has a chance is being endorsed by AIPAC. O-Bomb-ya says to get out of Iraq because it is such a miserable failure, but bombing Iran is not out the question.
We are being duped again. McCain or Romney vs Obama or Clinton. More wars on the horizon.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:51 pmI, too, think Obama can handle the Repugnicans.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:53 pmClinton, unfortunately, is so polarizing (undeservedly) that the Repugs will remain ceaseless in keeping the nation divided. Even people who like her and fondly remember the nineties are eager to move forward and not revert back to the last decade.
That hope that Obama touts is real; he does offer a change and I think he can have a positive effect on the nation, not only at home, but internationally as well.
McWars, ask yourself can Obama handle the republicans? I have my doubts.
Comment by wisedup
My point, exactly.
I posted after seeing your reply.
Anything they throw at Hillary will roll right off. Wes. Clark will take care of the national defense issues.
I like Obama, but the Reich will cream him.
Clinton / Clark ‘08
A∞Ω
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:58 pm2 – His cozy relationship with AIPAC.
I’m tired of seeing this and not challenging it. Why do you think you can make blanket statements like #2 above to justify saying that it will automatically result in endless wars.
Sorry but that just don’t fly. I hate the fact that the relationship exists too but it don’t mean they will take us to war because of it….necessariily
gw bush so far is the only one that had these close relationships that fell for it and went to war on thier behalf.
Even his dad resisted, as did rayguy…..damn that was hard to say but mostly true except his dad did attack just not occupy…..he just didn’t swallow……….
so how in the hell do you get from bill clinton to hillary and obama resulting in endless war…..didn’t happen under Bill….
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:59 pmHis answers were (1) On he didn’t say that, he meant Reagan was a great communicator. This is out of the mouth of a so-called “liberalâ€. Reagan, who started this free market insanity, busted Unions, Iran-Contra, and favored the rich.
Well, it’s true. Reagan was a great communicator. He was an actor, for pete’s sake – of course he was a great communicator.
Great communicator is not the same as great President. Adolf Hitler was a great communicator, too – that doesn’t mean he was good for Germany.
And (2) He said, “Obama will pull the rug out from AIPAC when he gets inâ€. This is Naive beyond description. EVERY candidate that has a chance is being endorsed by AIPAC. O-Bomb-ya says to get out of Iraq because it is such a miserable failure, but bombing Iran is not out the question.
Comment by Brain From Planet Arous — February 3, 2008 @ 12:51 pm
No candidate can win without AIPAC’s blessing, unfortunately. I trust Obama far more than “bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb McCain.”
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:04 pmSimply put, Obama is the best alternative out there. In fact, he is the only alternative. The first thig that has to be dealt with is undoing the harm Bush has foisted on this nation. Obama will make mistakes (they all do) but his mistakes will not begin to equal the grave sh!t pile our current pResident has given us.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:12 pmso how in the hell do you get from bill clinton to hillary and obama resulting in endless war…..didn’t happen under Bill….
Comment by Fred — February 3, 2008 @ 12:59 pm
Fred, normally I respect your views, but I will counter challenge your challenge.
Obama has said he would use force against Iran for his Zionist handlers.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/281249,CST-NWS-OBAMA03.article
Now, Hillary is even more in bed with AIPAC. Look at the State of the Union last week. She stood up and clapped when Bush mentioned more wars.
Bush has been such a miserable failure that even Snoop Dog could be elected if he ran.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:14 pmA brick wall, long posts, and blindfolds for these guys wouldn’t be too unseemly, would they?
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:15 pm“I know, I shouldn’t have said that,†Kristol concluded.
———
Yeah right Kristol. You know you should have said it when the cameras were off so you can keep the deplorable traits of right wingers concealed.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:18 pmNow, Hillary is even more in bed with AIPAC. Look at the State of the Union last week. She stood up and clapped when Bush mentioned more wars.
Comment by Brain From Planet Arous — February 3, 2008 @ 1:14 pm
~~~~~~~~~~
All of the Presidential candidates have pledged their allegiance to Israel. So you disagree with America’s support for Israel?
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:21 pmAll of the Presidential candidates have pledged their allegiance to Israel. So you disagree with America’s support for Israel?
Comment by delafield — February 3, 2008 @ 1:21 pm
I do! I do!
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:27 pmAll of the Presidential candidates have pledged their allegiance to Israel. So you disagree with America’s support for Israel?
Comment by delafield — February 3, 2008 @ 1:21 pm
I do too. I detest what we are part of there with the palastininans. There has to be a way to broker some kind of peace there that doesn’t create a situation where its us and Israel against the world.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:32 pmA brick wall, long posts, and blindfolds for these guys wouldn’t be too unseemly, would they?
Comment by Doc Rock
Let’s not forget a last cigarette, the tobacco lobby will insist.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:39 pmLet’s not quote from the SunTimes.
Comment by justasking
I liked you better when you asked the stupid, inane questions.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:41 pmI’ve never liked you. Period.
Comment by justasking
Ahhhh, the sweet words of success……….
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:45 pmok kids…
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:45 pmI guess they want women barefoot and naked slaving over a hot stove.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:46 pmI guess that’s the epilogue to your book “Stalking for Dummies.â€
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 1:48 pm
No one has to stalk dummies around here, because you all just wander in on your own.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:56 pmSo you disagree with America’s support for Israel?
Comment by delafield
America supports many countries, I dont think we should, however, ‘pledge’ to any of them. Israel can protect itself and like a child growing into an adult there comes a time for them to stand up, support themselves and cut the umbilical cord.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:57 pmWhen actually the saying is “barefoot and pregnantâ€. -JA
I suppose you missed the modifier “I guess they want” which isnt a projection. As for the saying I know how it goes and didnt want to repeat the same tired saying verbatim.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:59 pmoksure. Comment by justasking
Kfine.
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:01 pmThere has to be a way to broker some kind of peace there that doesn’t create a situation where its us and Israel against the world.
Comment by Fred — February 3, 2008 @ 1:32 pm
My solution would be to give all the land that Israel stole back to the Palestinians and then give Texas to the Jews. All the Jews move out of the Middle East to Texas (now renamed Israel) and all the Palestinians return to their homeland.
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:16 pmI, too, have reservations about Senator Obama’s plan to “reach out” to Republicans. Those bastards have done nothing to seek accommodation with Democrats for decades. They have sought to defame and derail us at every turn (Remember the pathetic Clinton impeachment?)
I am reminded of the parable about the scorpion who persuaded the frog to give him a piggyback ride across the pond. The frog was reluctant, to say the least, but the scorpion promised he would not sting the frog. Half way across the water, the scorpion slammed his stinger into the frog. Stunned, the frog asked, “Why, oh why, did you do that? Now both of us will drown!” The scorpion replied, “I couldn’t help it: it is my nature.”
It is the nature of Republicans to screw over Democrats — and the American people — at every turn. I am very uneasy at Obama’s plan to reach out to them.
Senator Clinton, on the other hand, has looked into the fiery eyes of the Republican beast. She knows exactly who and what they are. She bears the scars from two decades of battles and she — and her husband — have beaten them time and time again.
Since John Edwards, who promised to give no quarter to the Republcian money barons, has dropped out, my support goes to the Senator from the Empire State of New York.
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:21 pmWhat I find contradictory is that so-called liberals jump up and down, waving arms when Exxon and Lockheed lobby Right-Wing politicians, but are silent with AIPAC’s just as large sums of money to Democrats and republicans.
I also DO NOT like my tax dollars supporting Zionist ideals on Foreign Policy.
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:25 pmAll of the Presidential candidates have pledged their allegiance to Israel. So you disagree with America’s support for Israel?
Comment by delafield — February 3, 2008 @ 1:21 pm
Yes, just as I disagreed with Prescott Bush, Nixon, and Joe McCarthy supporting the Nazis before and after they invaded Poland.
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:28 pmSenator Clinton, on the other hand, has looked into the fiery eyes of the Republican beast. She knows exactly who and what they are. She bears the scars from two decades of battles and she — and her husband — have beaten them time and time again.
Comment by Don in Texas
Exactly !!
Clinton / Clark ‘08 or Clinton / Webb ‘08
A∞Ω
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:38 pmSpeaking as a “white woman”, I found this remark and especially the following laughter offensive.
And if Fox finds “white women” to be problematic, then start firing all the white women that work for Fox News. Here’s some problematic “white women”, Lynn Cheney, Laura Bush, Ann Coulter and Dana Perino to start with. Condi, is only 1/2 problematic because she is a black “woman”.
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:39 pmI also DO NOT like my tax dollars supporting Zionist ideals on Foreign Policy.
Comment by Brain From Planet Arous — February 3, 2008 @ 2:25 pm
“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this
and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear:
Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.
We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Ariel Sharon – Prime Minister of Israel – 10/3/2001
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:47 pmAriel Sharon – Prime Minister of Israel – 10/3/2001
Comment by delafield
Is he dead…………yet ?
A∞Ω
February 3rd, 2008 at 2:57 pmNo one has to stalk dummies around here, because you all just wander in on your own.
Comment by gummitch
They’re like the BB-gun arcade at the carnival midway.
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:19 pmThey rattle along on their chain, popping up to get shot at.
“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this
and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear:
Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.
We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.â€
Ariel Sharon – Prime Minister of Israel – 10/3/2001
Comment by delafield — February 3, 2008 @ 2:47 pm
Yes, he sure did say that, and we know it.
Don’t forget this. The sailors who survived sure didn’t:
http://www.gtr5.com/
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:21 pmDon’t forget this. The sailors who survived sure didn’t:
http://www.gtr5.com/
Comment by Brain From Planet Arous — February 3, 2008 @ 3:21 pm
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nice website, Brian. I especially liked the last sentence on the home page.
“In the case of USS Liberty, The United States of America is in default of its obligations.”
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:31 pmIs he dead…………yet ?
A∞Ω
Comment by alphainfinityomega — February 3, 2008 @ 2:57 pm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Believe it or not, he’s still alive. The evil ones die hard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:37 pmdelafield, I am sick and tired of Oil, Military, and Zionists dictating where our dollars go. This “You are Anti-Semitic” if you question Israel’s motives is a crock of sheet, much like if you question gangsta rap you are “racist”. I know many Jews who detest the current Likud/Zionist insanity, and I know African-Americans who like Jimi Hendrix, Sam Cooke, and Dionne Warwick much more than 50 Cent. Sort of like questioning the Bush administration, and you are labeled “Un-American” by Neo-Conartists and their brain damaged followers.
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:40 pmI am reminded of the scene in Blazing Saddles where Sherrif Bart and the Waco Kid crash Hedley Lamarr’s rogue signing line with the famous gag line…
“Where’s all the white women?”
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:50 pmThose problematic white women should invite these dumbballs to their next Tazer party.
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:54 pmThose problematic white women should invite these dumbballs to their next Tazer party.
Comment by Nevar — February 3, 2008 @ 3:54 pm
Finally, a good use for Tasers. :-D
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:57 pmRUC, I can never decide if Mel Brooks’ masterpiece was Blazing Saddles or Young Frankenstein.
February 3rd, 2008 at 3:58 pmguess that’s the epilogue to your book “Stalking for Dummies.â€
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 1:48 pm
That’s “Stalking The Dummies”, just for you.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:02 pmMAKE SURE YOU EMAIL THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THANK THEM FOR SUPPORTING KRISTOL AND GIVING HIM A PLATFORM FOR HIS PROPAGANDA
executive-editor@nytimes.com, krugman@nytimes.com, vannatta@nytimes.com, tiwein@nytimes.com, miwein@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com, liptaka@nytimes.com, bobherb@nytimes.com, public@nytimes.com, dabrooks@nytimes.com, dakirk@nytimes.com, dasang@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com, erschm@nytimes.com, febarr@nytimes.com, foreign@nytimes.com, justice@nytimes.com, cushman@nytimes.com, markoff@nytimes.com, letters@nytimes.com, ligree@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, mossm@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, pekilb@nytimes.com, ropear@nytimes.com, rotone@nytimes.com, stolberg@nytimes.com, slabaton@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com, lewin@nytimes.com, tiwein@nytimes.com, topurd@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com, safire@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, president@nytimes.com
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:15 pmI know many Jews who detest the current Likud/Zionist insanity
Comment by Brain From Planet Arous — February 3, 2008 @ 3:40 pm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The last Jew who took criticized Likud got his brains blown out (by a right wing Jew).
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:22 pmRePugniScums hate all women. The darker and poorer you are the more that hate you!
And they are empowered by the reich-wing Christianistas in their corrupt empire!!
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:23 pmNo wonder all of the candidates campaigns that you supported flopped.
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 4:14 pm
really? Like bill clinton?
I thought sure he had two elected terms.
thanks for losing again, justassing. you’re a born loser.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:24 pmI forgot to post the link with message #71…..
The man who confessed to killing Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin appeared in court for the first time Monday. Jewish law student Yigal Amir told the judge the assassination was meant to halt the Mideast peace process.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:24 pmhttp://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9511/rabin/umbrella/
Maybe Brit hasn’t been with alot of black women like Bill Clinton has.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:25 pmMaybe Brit hasn’t been with alot of black women like Bill Clinton has.
Comment by Ricl077
I love it when you guys bring up the billster…….he really rubbed salt in the gashes didn’t he? He was a sucess despite every dirty underhanded thing that you guys came up with…ha.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:31 pmVampire Kristol: “White women are a problem.â€
Somebody should give Kristol the Foot-in-the Mouth Award. Nothing surprises me from the Clown Network that have two asses instead of one.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:31 pmThis election term. This is 2008. Not the ’90’s. Bill will not get a third term.
Though any day I expect him to say “F this!…I’m running!â€
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 4:28 pm
I haven’t stated my support for any candidate, so you’re yanking it out of y8our ass…again. as usual. Try again, when you have a fact at your disposal instead of one of your runny turds.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:34 pmMaybe Brit hasn’t been with alot of black women like Bill Clinton has.
Comment by Ricl077
so, give us the lowdown on bill’s black girlfriends. names, pictures, dates, etc. You threw it out here, you must have some backup.
or not, right, liar?
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:35 pm“Where are the white woman at”?
I love that movie. The satirical racism is timeless
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:37 pmRic got this from a statement by former ambassador Andrew Young. He made this faux pas in correlation to Obama and Clinton by saying Clinton is probably more black than Barack Obama by virtue of Clinton probably has “been with†more black women.
And he’s supposed to be a Clinton supporter!
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 4:37 pm
that’s bullshit.
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:40 pmObama is endorsed by Senators Ben Nelson, McCaskill, Kennedy, Leahy, Kerry, Johnson, Conrad and Durbin.
His endorsements by Governors include Napolitano, Sebelius, Doyle, Blagojevich, Patrick and Kaine.
He also has endorsements from a couple of dozen members of the US House.
How then, can these Fox News guys consider Obama to be “anti-establishment?”
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:49 pmScary huh?
Comment by justasking
BOO!
February 3rd, 2008 at 4:59 pmBOO!
Comment by Nevar — February 3, 2008 @ 4:59 pm
Uh oh. Change of underwear necessary for a troll.
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:04 pmLooks like I hit what I was aiming at.
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:08 pmI’ll take the giant stuffed panda bear, please.
True.
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:11 pmSeems as though you’ve got a firm grip on the gas pipe however…
Is that supposed to be some kind of hiaku or something?
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:33 pmWrong again, Nevar.
You’re always wrong.
Comment by justasking
…Lord knows I have no attachment to being right………
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:42 pmsome kind of hiaku
(I think with justaskank it’s hookah)
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:44 pmYou must be old, Nevar.
Comment by justasking
Don’t tell me what to be…
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:47 pmsorry, I meant skink
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:48 pmBut you’re justright.
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:50 pmsorry, I meant skink
Comment by Nevar — February 3, 2008 @ 5:48 pm
Isn’t this kind of mean to skinks?
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:53 pmThere was no relationship implied between the corruption of your screen name and the implication of the source of your utterances.
I know, I know, this won’t make sense to you………
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:53 pmWell, skinks are lizards and Carlos Castenada once told of getting two lizards together and sewing the eyes of one of them shut and then letting them go out and be the eyes and ears of the knowledge seeker. I also just figured he had been at the hookah too long.
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:54 pmIsn’t this kind of mean to skinks?
Comment by gummitch
Yes, I was pretty sure I was going to get called on this as well.
February 3rd, 2008 at 5:56 pmMy apologies to skinks everywhere, especially the ones in my garden
“…not doing a good enough job covering your ass.”
Comment by justasking
I’ll acknowledge that.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:01 pmI don’t spend much time perfecting neo-con talents.
what about the Jimson weed and Diviner’s sage?
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:04 pmIf you people spent as much time attacking Neoconservatives as you spent attacking each other, our economy would be as strong as it was during the Clinton years and all of our troops would be out of Iraq and Afganistan.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:16 pmI’m back, sorry, I wasn’t paying attention, did you miss me?
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:17 pmActually, I stepped out for a moment to do precisely that.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:19 pmThere is one less neo-conservative on my block now.
Is Kristol right about ANYTHING?
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:22 pmI’m back, sorry, I wasn’t paying attention, did you miss me?
Comment by Nevar — February 3, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
Did you figure out yet what a “hiaku” was? I figured it might be what happened when you dropped a haiku out the window, but I’m not completely sure.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:23 pmuh…there is no more Neo conservative party.
It takes awhile for the news to reach middle America…
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:27 pm“hiaku”
I thought it was the sound justasking makes when it sneezes.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:28 pmI think he can. I think he can peel off a good portion of the evangelical vote that’s currently going to the Republicans.
Comment by toasterhead — February 3, 2008 @ 12:44 pm
Well, the portion he can peel off are the Black Evangelicals. The problem is, that to do so, he has to throw gays off his bus (and he made a pretty good start at doing just that when he signed Donnie McClurkin on to that little tour last year).
Obama won’t make any inroads into the White Evangelicals because they’ll back whichever of the GOPers gets the nod. McCain’s sucked up enough to the Evangelical tit/ass that he can still get that vote. Romney’s “Mormon problem” won’t be that much of one (I live in Alabama and I’ve seen more signs of support for Romney than any other GOP candidate*); Mormons are, for the Evangelicals, the “new Catholics”, and we’ve all seen how tied together the Evangelicals and Catholics have been in the last few Presidential election cycles. Huckabee? Well he IS an Evangelical. No way in hell that he’ll get less than 95% of the White Evangelical vote in November if he’s the GOP nominee (I would say that he’d get the full 100% but every group’s got its dissenting voices); if Huckabee has the GOP nomination, he could easily undo Obama’s hard-fought “gains” with Black Evangelicals (in which case Obama will have that McClurkin problem with the LGBT community). (Ron Paul won’t get the nomination so it’s pretty pointless considering him, but on the very off chance he should, the whole of the Evangelical community, Black AND White, will probably sit out the election, unless some strong Evangelical name launches a late 3rd party effort.)
*By signs of support, I mean the type in people’s yards and on their car bumpers, not the stuff that’s anonymously slapped onto utility poles.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:32 pmuh…there is no more Neo conservative party.
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 6:24 pm
I guess that means that George Bush, Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill O’Reilly, and Michael Savage are now Liberals.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii……………………….
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:35 pmI think you’re just plain ol’ self-righteous.
Comment by justasking
But then I’d have to be right…
AAAAAAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii…………….
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:37 pmStupid double vowels and diphthongs.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:37 pmOMG I’M PWNED
USING NETSPEAK CONSTANTLY
O SHIT WTF
just one of my favs from badhaiku.com
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:41 pmRemember, no double dipping at the Stupid Bowl party, and thongs belong at the Tazer party next door…
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:43 pmy’all are dull.
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 6:45 pm
Yeah. you’re right. Where can a fellow turn for some inane rants about atheism when they feel the need?
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:50 pmI wish BARTLEBEE was here.
Comment by justasking
You could go look for him…………
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:54 pmy’all are dull.
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 6:45 pm
The whine of the troll.
I’d suggest it was time to get a life, but that ship has sailed.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:54 pmHere’s a hiaku:
Comment by CaptainMantastic
Yikesee.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:59 pmTwo in a row.
haha! I knew mentioning Bartlebee would get the pseudo intellectuals going.
Comment by justasking
Yep.
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:01 pmYou almost lost us to boredom there.
Thank gawd you can pull up an absent party.
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 6:55 pm
My Nature…?
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:02 pmI think the Who pretty much summed that up with “I am the Sea”. Bashing isn’t my thing. Questioning is.
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 7:02 pm
Get over it. I mispelled it first
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:03 pm*sigh*
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 7:07 pm
yes, justassing, all those posts, and you’ve yet to make a point of any salience. some things never change. we don’t need bartlebee, we have you for irrelevance and emptiness.
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:09 pmYou took the time to type that?
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:12 pmOld and in the way.
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:13 pmI’ll happily step aside and watch you trip headlong into the ditch.
And walk across on your youthful springy carcass.
Hope you don’t mind.
Damn I’m good!
Two repartees, to a single post, in a row, from the same poster, who wasn’t even directly addressed!
A round of Geritol for everyone!
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:23 pmA round of Geritol for everyone!
Comment by Nevar — February 3, 2008 @ 7:23 pm
Perhaps you should just sit back and see if the eejit can do a bartlebee and just carry a conversation with itself. It’s only up to two comments, but you never know . . .
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:26 pmIt’s only up to two comments, but you never know . . .
Comment by gummitch — February 3, 2008 @ 7:26 pm
well, it certainly seems to be on that very path.
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:27 pmsee #157
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:28 pmDeflect what?
Oh, I’m sorry, I didn’t ask you about the path you’re walking down..
What is it?
Cowpath?
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:33 pmPath of no return?
Pathogen?
Psychopath?
in remberance of BARTLEBEE.
:]
Comment by justasking
correction: remembrance
don’t mention it, justryingtohelp……..
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:39 pmIt took you THAT long to get up and pretend you were quick on your feet?
Comment by justasking
I had to let some young whippersnapper check his e-mail…………
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:43 pmNo one has to stalk dummies around here, because you all just wander in on your own.
Comment by gummitch
gummitch – that has to be one of the best comebacks I’ve ever read. You rock, brother.
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:51 pmdbadass, Nevar – if only the troll new :) Ha!
And to add to an above comment, the white Evangelies will NOT be voting this November. They’ve already been told to stay home or write-in Hucklebee.
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:05 pmAnd yes, I do take offense to men trashing women in public. If Fox News finds white women so problematic, then Ann Coulter along with countless other white women will never appear on this network. That should take care of the problem of “white women”.
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:07 pmThere was a time when I didn’t want Fox commentators to get any air time. Of late, I have been wishing they would be on 24/7 in every living room in the country. They are SO out of touch and SO ignorant and SO buffonish that the country needs to see them for exactly what they are. Keep talking morons!
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:12 pmClinton, unfortunately, is so polarizing (undeservedly) that the Repugs will remain ceaseless in keeping the nation divided. Even people who like her and fondly remember the nineties are eager to move forward and not revert back to the last decade.
Comment by Marie — February 3, 2008 @ 12:53 pm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If Marie thinks that Hillary is polarizing, what does she think will happen if Obama gets the nomination? Do you think that the Republicans will be kind, loving, generous, and helpful to Obama?
If Obama gets the nomination (which is exactly what the GOP wants) they will make Obama look more evil than Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Josef Stalin combined.
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:23 pmja – gummitch would excuse my “typo”. I know it should be “knew” and not “new”.
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:24 pmTo who?
Comment by justasking
Your friends…
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:31 pmThe interviewer asked if he was going to endoHe is does not practice endorsing candidates. But that’s what they all say at first. This interview took place just before Edwards dropped out.
Comment by justasking — February 3, 2008 @ 8:27 pm
Remember Michael Dukakis in 1988? They’re going to be asking the same question about Obama’s run in 2008 if he gets the nomination.
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:33 pmNice deflection, Nevar.
What is this deflection stuff all about?
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:37 pmDeflection from what?
“To who” was your question, I offered an answer.
WTF is wrong with you?
Your bashing me was the deflection.
Comment by justasking
That’s all I wanted to know.
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:45 pm(No need to get all huffy about it, I was justasking……….)
Old Man Troll!
Comment by justasking
OK, you win, I’ll go take out my teeth, put them in the jar, and get ready for bed.
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:49 pmThank you for the afternoons diversion, I hate football…..
get a room somewhere.
Comment by CaptainMantastic
How ’bout your place?
February 3rd, 2008 at 8:57 pmI just don’t get it.
Comment by CaptainMantastic
It’s ritualized combat.
February 3rd, 2008 at 9:00 pmKeeps the rabble distracted from the actual atrocities.
Bread, anyone?
I am so tired of the Daily Kos and its pro Obama site, its really getting old.
It would be nice if this site had a daily open thread that wasn’t pro anything or subject guided.
I usually read the front page but have been posting to a particular board rooted since 1997. I dabbled on Kos but I can’t stand it anymore.
February 3rd, 2008 at 10:07 pmCactus Jack, TP has an open thread each weekday morning called “Think Fast.”
February 3rd, 2008 at 10:14 pmLooks like weekends are slow as hell on TP, what with all three threads up.
February 3rd, 2008 at 10:52 pmFootball is like chess, except with pads and lots of violence.
Not that I have’n't seen some violent chess games…
Geez, people…get a sense of humor! If Fox News said the sun is hot, most of the commenters here would accuse them of sexual harrassment. And if they made a joke about it, they would be bigots and fascists as well.
February 5th, 2008 at 8:28 am*BertConvy..? More like “Bert and Ernie”
“hildebeast” Well, at least she’s not a lying BASTARD like Bush…or a racially ignorant “can bill dance like a brother” Obama.
February 5th, 2008 at 11:35 amAs for woman well we’re sister regardless of color but if you don’t like woman then you must prefer men. As for Brit Hume he had to speak up as he got his job because his wife gave it to him. With Mrs. Hume, Brit would be jobless. Right Brit you don’t bite the hand that feeds you. Now these sickos should join up with Tweety and O’Reilly. That asus m3000n battery,asus m3000np battery would be a comedy show with the highest ratings.
October 15th, 2008 at 3:56 amAll the idiots, racist, woman haters and closet people all together to air their sick views representing their Republican Party. Maybe Ann would join in too.
I wonder what Laura Bush thinks of the comment about White woman isn’t she white?