Savage: Lantos used Holocaust ‘as a weapon.’
Discussing the death of Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA) on his radio show yesterday, conservative talker Michael Savage said he “detested” Lantos. Savage called him “a scoundrel” who “survived the Holocaust of World War II and used it as a weapon the rest of his life”:
SAVAGE: Who died? What’s his name? Lantos? You know, that’s a tough one for me to deal with. You’re not supposed to talk badly about the dead. I generally wouldn’t do it. But in the case of Tom Lantos, I’ll make an exception. I think he was one of the most — he was a scoundrel. And I’ll tell you why I detested Tom Lantos. The man survived the Holocaust of World War II and used it as a weapon the rest of his life. That’s why. Do you understand what I just said to you? You can’t have it both ways. You can’t suffer such a horror, and then use it as a weapon without people noticing it. You know what I’m saying to you? I didn’t like Tom Lantos.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
91 Responses to “Savage: Lantos used Holocaust ‘as a weapon.’”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Register
RSSLogin
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog RollAbout Think ProgressContact Us
Donate
What a hateful idiot. Why is he still on the air? Are there any ‘real’ americans who still listen to him?
We have fallen so far, it makes me weep. In the old days, he would have been dragged from his office and fired.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:53 pmNo wonder sponsors are dropping his disgusting, hate-filled radio show like a hot potato!
What a scumbag.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:54 pmhe didn’t like Lantos? That’s about the highest praise one can conceive of for Lantos. Who would ever want to be liked by Weiner?
February 12th, 2008 at 7:56 pmAny company that has advertising on this vile scums show should really rethink what they are supporting.
Agreed, what a scumbag…I think Justanass just might be Savage’s TP name here.
Buck Fush
February 12th, 2008 at 7:57 pmDoes this surprise anybody?
February 12th, 2008 at 7:58 pmWeiner really is one self hating prick. If weiner hated Lantos that much it may cause me to re-evaluate my opinion of Lantos
February 12th, 2008 at 7:58 pmThere’s nothing like trashing Holocaust survivors to appeal to the Republican base. It’s an innate part of the right wing psyche to resent and demonstrate contempt for victims. The ideological ancestor of the Republican party, the NAZI party, thrived on their contempt of the weak, defenseless, sick, poor and downtrodden. Yes, we’re in a different country in a different time, but right wingers are the same any time any place.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:58 pmKeep it up Jackass, and soon enough you won’t have enough advertisers to power up that mic of yours.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:59 pmSavage Weiner traffics in the same grotesque hate-kabuki that Mann Coulter peddles. I don’t think they even believe it themselves, they just know what sells to their audience.
But Snowball is right — they hate a victim, don’t they? And they really resent the moral authority that victimhood naturally carries.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:02 pmThat’s the key to it wonder llama, the resentment of the moral authority victim hood imparts, but more than that, it’s outright envy.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:06 pmThey hate victims but they love casting themselves as victims.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:06 pmBoohoo they won’t let me practice my religion.
Boohoo the liberal media is out to get us.
Boohoo the loony left want to take away my guns.
On foreign policy, what could Savage hate about Lantos? He was for every war we started or sponsored against Muslims.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:07 pmThis man is beyond sick. He is so full of hate it must be eating him up inside. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to hear he comes down with cancer soon.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:08 pmComment by Snowball — February 12, 2008 @ 7:58 pm
Yes, we’re in a different country in a different time, but right wingers are the same any time any place.
Yes the ideology remains the same. But to succeed, fascism takes a different form in each country that it is applied. As has often been stated, and beautifully so IMO, “When fascism comes to the USA it will be wearing a flag and carrying a cross.”
February 12th, 2008 at 8:10 pmMany people across a broad spectrum sypathize with these sentiments towards Jews who are so-called “professional victims”. Certainly many on this blog, myself included.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:10 pmSavage: Lantos used Holocaust ‘as a weapon.’
Because Lantos called for an invasion of Germany ?
Sanctions ?
Any type or form of retribution ?
Weiner is a brainless , hateful nitwit…………
February 12th, 2008 at 8:10 pmSo, I can assume that Michael “Savage” similarly views the Jews who used survived and then used the horrors of the Holocaust to form the nation of Israel, as “scoundrels” and likewise “detested” them.
Ohhhhhh, wait…let me guess. Only if you use a genocide such as the Holocaust to support right-wing ideals and policy, or use such such horrors to justify warfare or other terrible acts visited upon your fellow man, is it acceptable. If you use a horrible tragedy such as the Holocaust to PREVENT further horrible tragedies like THE HOLOCAUST from occuring again, you are using that terrible atrocity as a “weapon”.
The rank hypocrisy really knows no bounds, does it? I truly hope that Michael Weiner…err “Savage” loses every single solitary advertiser he has on every single station on which his show is broadcast. Every damned one! This person is, quite simply, one of the most vile, disgusting, hateful, contemptible individuals within the entire entertainment community.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:11 pmI might add it is still a disgrace mocking the dead, and I’m sure God will punish Savage~
February 12th, 2008 at 8:11 pmLantos, who told an Israeli MP: “My dear Colette, don’t worry. You won’t have any problem with Saddam. We’ll be rid of the bastard soon enough. And in his place we’ll install a pro-Western dictator, who will be good for us and for you.”
Why would Savage hate this guy? Because he repented at the end and opposed the surge?
February 12th, 2008 at 8:11 pm“I didn’t like Tom Lantos.”
That’s nice , Weiner ; there’s a lot more who don’t particularly care for you……….
February 12th, 2008 at 8:13 pm#17, that’s the rub. On foreign policy, Lantos did use the Holocaust to support right-wing ideology. He was a war-Dem.
Savage’s hatred of him is bizarre in that context.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:13 pmGuido, can you explain why you see Rep. Lantos as a “professional victim”?
Or am I reading your comment wrongly?
February 12th, 2008 at 8:13 pmDisrespecting the dead? IOIYAR.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:13 pm#14, Roosevelt’s VP also said American fascism would attempt to control the media and means of information rather than use jackboots in the streets.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:14 pmoh wow!
we’ve seen this before with the 9/11 widows, the katrina survivors and the wild fires in california.
just “die hard” him.
stick him in he middle of israel with a lunchboard sign
February 12th, 2008 at 8:14 pmServe Savage up some frontier justice:
http://nosavage.org/
Let the butt-kissing advertisers lose some cash until they come to their senses and realize people won’t tolerate an @sshole like Savage.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:15 pmI’m sure Weiner Savage wouldn’t mind if someone disrespected the VP if he keeled over because his ticker finally gave out. What? He would consider it “hate speech?” How rich.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:16 pmI didn’t know Mr. Lantos but I must say, a holocaust survivor would have to work very hard not to be angry about their experience. This is just my opinion but to jump on the guy when he’s dead is slightly over the top. He’s not here to defend himself and in all probability he has a grieving family somewhere that wouldn’t want to hear this nasty stuff. To quote a famous witness who was called to appear before the charlatan Senator Joe McCarthy, a most disingenuous individual to say the least, “Have you no shame sir, have you no shame!”
February 12th, 2008 at 8:19 pmAnother tidbit about Lantos.
Remember that Kuwaiti “nurse” that claimed that Iraqis stole incubators leaving babies to die on the hospital floor, and the story later proved to be a fabrication and the girl the Kuwaiti ambassador’s daughter?
Lantos was the one who championed her and her testimony, and appears to have been the recipient of Kuwaiti lobbyist money for it.
Not to disrespect the dead, but again, what beef could a mouth-breather like Savage have with Lantos? He seems to have done everything right in Savage’s world-view.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:24 pmOne last one: Lantos was the guy who whined to Dutch legislators that they were making a bigger deal over Guantanamo than anyone did over Auschwitz at the time.
Isn’t this sort of thing right up Savage’s alley?
February 12th, 2008 at 8:26 pmI’m still waiting for him to call out Bush and the Republican party. Suffering something like 9/11 and then using that as a weapon…isn’t that a pretty similar case? I guess he only has a problem if the person wielding the weapon is someone he dislikes.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:27 pmOnly the Nazi sympathizers are allowed to say anything without consequence. Weiner is not a whore pure and simple.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:33 pmProfessional Victims:
Palestinians, Israelis, Neocons, FOX employees. And some of the Dallas Mavericks from the early 80’s.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:37 pmdon’t forget trolls guido…
February 12th, 2008 at 8:47 pmAll decent people should make his advertisers aware of his hateful stance. Savage is what his name says that he is- A savage. That this man can continues to be able to broadcast on American airwaves is in and of itself a disgrace, I would love to have him say these things to my face, but alas, he wouldn’t dare, because, thus is to cowards….
February 12th, 2008 at 8:49 pmThere’s nothing like trashing Holocaust survivors to appeal to the Republican base. It’s an innate part of the right wing psyche to resent and demonstrate contempt for victims. The ideological ancestor of the Republican party, the NAZI party, thrived on their contempt of the weak, defenseless, sick, poor and downtrodden. Yes, we’re in a different country in a different time, but right wingers are the same any time any place.
True, the Republicans have a contempt for “victims” and they love to hate. However, I don’t think the Jews living in early WWII Nazi Germany were weak, defenseless, sick, poor and downtrodden. They were selected by the Nazi’s because they didn’t fit into the Aryan mold of perfection. They were forced into those death camps.
I don’t know about living in a different country in a different time…
Today, we can be renditioned at anytime for any reason, with no legal recourse. We have a state sanctioned media and electoral machine. Our justice system resembles something the Third Reich would admire. Our vote no longer counts; only those appointed by The Party will make the selection for us. Thanks to the Senate, the government can now spy on us without a warrant. We cannot travel without “our papers”.
Seems like 6 degrees of Prescott Bush.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:52 pmReeeelax, folks. Much like Anne Coulter, Michael Savage is just getting increasingly DESPERATE to hold onto his, ahem, “position” in the world, and he, like the rest of the Reich-wing Hate-osphere, is sinking, slowly but surely, into his own muck.
Remember when Rush Limbaugh got kicked off of MNF for his “controversial’ remarks about Donovan McNabb and the NFL’s vested interest in seeing a black quarterback succeed? Same routine.
Did anyone actually WATCh Rush in his brief moments on the show?
Talk about out-of-place. The real commentators, who usually were ACTUAL athletes, kept looking at him like, “Whoa, what’s this pointless blob doin’ here?” I think Rush knew he was in over his head and it was only a matter of time before they sacked him for all the right reasons, and he just tried to save face by being “too hot to handle”.
I was rather surprised and disappointed he got away w/ it so easily. And in my opinion, that’s all Savage is doing here… yanking people’s chains, hoping it boosts his sinking ratings.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:59 pmOnly a coward would wait till a man’s death to attack him like this. Lantos was a victim of the Holocaust, and lived to become a Representative in the US Congress, let’s let it be at that. Savage, on the other hand, is still a living, hate-filled, divisive, coward as of this moment in time.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:03 pm“Hate Hurts America”
http://thinkprogress.org/ 2008/ 02/ 11/ five-advertisers-drop-savage/
February 12th, 2008 at 9:03 pmUnbelievable - or, on the other hand, I guess not. What I don’t get is where are scums like Savage going with all this hate? It’s depressing, and disgusting to think that there are actually living, breathing human beings out there that will agree with this POS.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:06 pmTrashing Holocaust survivors does not appeal to Neocons.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:09 pmEver see those McCain tv ads where they show footage of his return from his ordeal?
February 12th, 2008 at 9:16 pmReich-wingers use their constant whining as a weapon.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:19 pmI’d bet anyone $1 that the Weiner/Savage never said this to Lantos’ face.
Ever.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:21 pmSavage is an arshloch!
February 12th, 2008 at 9:21 pmI’d bet anyone $1 that the Weiner/Savage never said this to Lantos’ face.
Ever.
Comment by Zooey — February 12, 2008 @ 9:21 pm
And if he had, Lantos would have respectfully explained in thoughtful even tones that he was a fool. Savage would have missed the point.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:25 pmComment by muzz — February 12, 2008 @ 9:06pm
It’s depressing, and disgusting to think that there are actually living, breathing human beings out there that will agree with this POS.
What is really disgusting is that they are given the platform and a megaphone to “rouse the rabble” out there. And only “the people” can take it away from them. Sadly, as was mentioned here, complacency rules and the powerful, like runaway cancer, have taken charge of the store.
It will take time and some massive doing to bring back reality, compassion and compassion as the basis for ruling our country.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:25 pmSavage would have missed the point.
Comment by dbadass — February 12, 2008 @ 9:25 pm
Savage would ridicule him for being a gentleman.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:26 pmDoes this man like ANYONE? Ever? At ALL?
February 12th, 2008 at 9:35 pmEven a little?
February 12th, 2008 at 9:35 pmThis comment…to hate a man to get ratings for your show…should show how crazed the right-wing has become. To attack a genuine hero who stood for something all because he isn’t “on your side” and making you money and getting you interviews is now our era’s yellow journalism. Greed, hate and blood lust are the GOP’s original sins that have cast millions into supporting a regime of unpatriotic, immoral and outright lying scum that circumvent our greatest document to err with darkness and intolerance that many of our finest citizens fought against…and the enemies they say they fight.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:36 pmComment by LibertyLover — February 12, 2008 @ 9:35 pm
rumor has it he’s pretty fond of himself.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:37 pmTruthfully, Joe?
I’d say Savage-Weiner is so chock full of self-loathing it trickles out his ears all day long.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:48 pmI hate Savage, but Lantos is not without his faults. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Lantos was an Israel first type of guy.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:57 pmMore here:
http://www.antiwar.com/zunes/?articleid=12195
Not a very “hateful” site, it’s got antiwar in it’s name.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:01 pmI find the amount of enmity that Mr Savage contains unhealthy.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:02 pmBoycott the energy drink ROCKSTAR. It’s Savage invention. His son is the president, his “wife” is the CFO. Hit em where it hurts.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:06 pmLantos had his faults, and was by no means perfect, but there’s no reason to dance on his bones in full view of his grieving family.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:07 pmThis low-life POS should be kicked off the air for his hatefilled rants that appeal to the radical fringe. He makes no sense, has no logic, he simply spews bile.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:13 pmHe is losing his sponsors one after the other - he’s desperate to attract attention to his show.
anti-war.com is a Libertarian site, they need to have an all powerful international Jewish conspiracy to deflect attention away from their precious corporations. US imperialism goes way farther back than the birth of the Zionist movement or the establishment of the state of Israel. The Zionist conspiracy stuff at anti-war can’t explain the long history of the US overthrowing democratically elected governments in Latin America, Asia and elsewhere that interfered with American corporate interests. At worst, the invasion of Iraq was a coming together of the US desire to control the middle easts resources and right wing elements in the Zionist movement. The US Military Industrial Complex and Big Oil are the major players here, not a small group of rabid Isreal firsters.
And for the record, most Libertarians I’ve talked to would invade Venezuela in a heartbeat (despite their “anti war” rhetoric). We can’t have those “Socialists” nationalizing their natural resources, can we?
February 12th, 2008 at 10:16 pmDamn those nations that want to develop for the better and get out from under our thumb!
February 12th, 2008 at 10:31 pmComment by IndyWillie — February 12, 2008 @ 9:57 pm
Agreed. Still, decorum and manners matter!
February 12th, 2008 at 10:36 pmBTW, I was an antiwar.com reader for quite awhile before I started to notice weirdness about it that didn’t jive with my leftist views or anything I associated with being Progressive. I finally got suspicious and checked out who they were.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:39 pmOne thing was when I started checking out who Paul Craig Roberts was and found his stuff at the far right anti-immigrant sight VDare.com. I then found out he was a right wing nativist similar to Pat Buchanan who was part of the Reagan administration.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:47 pmYeah, some of these “groups” that are online can be tricky. I’ve been fooled a few times by the softer right-wing news sites. All it takes is the backing of what seems to be a credible university or url title. That’s why we all need to read the fine print or come to sites like this.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:51 pmIf you like Paul Craig Roberts at antiwar.com, you’ll love him at http://vdare.com/
Check it out!
February 12th, 2008 at 10:51 pmFor those who prefer to think for themselves, once you go to Antiwar.com, click on the “Who We Are” link located at the upper left of the sidebar. The site is no more promoting Zunes’ article that TP is the comments you are reading here. There are many writers, from many differing points of view that are included on the site. The site itself has been promoting non-intervention since the Bush Sr. days. Belittling the site and accusing the members of the Libertarian Party, without any basis in fact, of pro-interventionist leanings toward Venezuela is disingenuous at best. We live in times when we need to question authority and the best way of doing so is to decide for yourself, not merely be guided by the ignorance of others.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:51 pmIf you want to ally yourself with corporatist proto-Fascists, I guess that’s your business.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:58 pmLibertarianism, aside from being corporate political astroturf, is supremacist oligarchy with a joint in its left hand and the iron fist of corporatism on the right.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:02 pmComment by Snowball — February 12, 2008 @ 11:02 pm
Libertarianism, aside from being corporate political astroturf, is supremacist oligarchy with a joint in its left hand and the iron fist of corporatism on the right.
Spot on Snowball!
February 12th, 2008 at 11:05 pmLibertarianism doesn’t question authority, it’s a psy-ops tool of corporate interests. Yes, they’ll say you can smoke pot and proclaim themselves “non-interventionists” (read old school right wing isolationist) but you can’t use the democratic instrument of government to regulate corporations in the public interest or organize effective unions. Try talking to a Libertarian about global heating or civil rights. You’ll get the same right wing claptrap you get from Republicans.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:11 pmWhy don’t you try and dispute the claims in the article? Sheesh
February 12th, 2008 at 11:13 pmYou seem to want a straw man argument. You are arguing against Libertarianism as though someone was actually debating that subject with you. The subject being debated here is “non-interventionism”, whether you are from the right left, or Pluto. The Anti-war site is by far the best news site regarding American interventionism around the world, that is available on the web. Then, some are happy sitting on sites like TP and waiting for the next juicy from the MSM, so they can comment as though they had someting interesting, intelligent, or different to say.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:18 pmI’m not saying Lantos was above and beyond criticism or that some of his views towards that Arab? Israeli conflict were all that great. Actually, in some of his positions, he was relatively moderate towards the middle east situation in comparison with many. I’m just saying, all roads don’t lead to a Zionist conspiracy. The US empire is far greater than any Israeli lobby. Israel is just a strategic hamlet for US interests, not the other way around.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:21 pmnumber 7 hits the nail on the head.I am waiting to hear a word from Bush Limbaugh,Mann Coulter and the rest of the BUSHCO crime family (The Nazi Party).The hate filled remarks by Savage just tells me that this non-human REICH Winger is a far cry from the REICH.This man does not deserve to to be on the air muchless breath it.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:22 pmArab/Israeli. That was a typo.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:22 pmAnd the problem I have with antiwar is where they place the onus of responsibility for global conflict. See much criticism of Exxon-Mobil there? I haven’t.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:29 pmA quick search of the Anti-war site yielded 4 pages of articles on Exxon-Mobil. None of them supportive!
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=742 - 59k
This is only one example from that extreme Libertarian, Justin Raimondo ( with whom I have a great deal of disagreement in terms of politics)
February 12th, 2008 at 11:43 pm#18 Guido OBGYN Lover: I don’t care to wait for God to punish Savage. I’d much rather a human do it now!
February 12th, 2008 at 11:46 pm“Speaking of things creepy, the pattern with these neocons is always the same: backed up against a wall, they simply yell “fascist” as a last resort. While the supposedly “brownshirted” Buchanan deplores the humanitarian catastrophe caused by our ongoing war on the Iraqi people, “anti-fascists” like Stuttaford and Foreman can’t wait to unleash American hellfire on the Arab peoples of the entire region. It’s funny that all the cruelty, the lust for power and conquest is on the “anti-fascist” side – now why do you think that is?
By the way, what is so “undemocratic” about not excluding the military from the national debate? The neocons sure wanted those military votes during the Florida recount, going so far as charging that the anti-military Democrats were trying to disenfranchise the troops, and demanding that the voice of the troops be heard loud and clear.
What a difference a war makes.
Now they are supposed to shut up and send their soldiers to die – and for what? So that Exxon-Mobil and British Petroleum can pump oil out of the soil of a “democratic” Iraqi? So that every country in the Middle East can be transformed into a Jeffersonian republic at gunpoint? So that Israel’s enemies are smitten, one by one, with the blunt end of American power, and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians can proceed under cover of the resulting conflagration? ”
From Justin Raimondo: http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j090402.html
Read more at anti-war.com
February 13th, 2008 at 12:07 am“Do you understand what I just said to you?”
“You know what I’m saying to you?”
Um, no one understands your diatribes Weiner. But keep talking bud, your sponsors must love this,… it makes their decision to bail on you that much easier.
February 13th, 2008 at 12:30 amForget about antiwar.com. Why not address the war mongering israel first positions that Lantos put forth. Sheesh
February 13th, 2008 at 12:39 amOT-This from the Daily Kos
Obama Beat the Republicans
by Devilstower
Tue Feb 12, 2008 at 09:10:25 PM PST
Barack Obama didn’t just beat Hillary in Virginia. He didn’t just get more votes than John McCain. In “red” Virginia, Obama got 142,000 more votes than all the Republicans put together. And that was with Hillary Clinton taking 100,000 more votes than John McCain.
He kicked butt, took names, and did it with both hands tied behind his back.
Oh, and in Maryland, with 40% of the vote in, Hillary is beating all Republicans put together while losing by 27%. You could probably limit Democrats to only left-handed voters, or red-haired voters, or left-handed red-haired voters whose names start with ‘Q,’ and the Republicans would still be in trouble.
February 13th, 2008 at 12:51 amI live right next to Lantos district. I was glad he was not my representative because I didn’t support him. I used to have a bumper sticker on my car against Lantos because he was a hawk. But I would not say that he was totally bad. On some issues, he voted right. The district is very Democratic and will be represented by Spier, a change for the better.
February 13th, 2008 at 2:20 amThis information needs to be released to EVERY
Holocaust victims-associated groups WORLDWIDE.
Let THEM tale on the sponsors or the Weiner.
February 13th, 2008 at 2:20 amLet THEM take on the sponsors of the Weiner.
Oy. Nitol!
February 13th, 2008 at 2:21 amI think there are a lot of Republicans voting for Obama on the Democratic side. They would rather face Obama than Hillary in the general election. Remember, the members of the “Free Republic†web site were celebrating when Obama won the Iowa caucus.
Comment by delafield — February 13, 2008 @ 2:16 am
That isn’t possible in every state. Many have more stringent, lengthy requirements to switch which party you vote for in a primary. No last-minute sort of thing. Moreover, many of the Republican turnouts are average, but the Democratic turnouts are breaking records. This isn’t just freak Republican spoiler votes.
If the Republicans ARE trying to vote Obama in because they think he’d be easier to defeat in the general election, I think they are making a horrific tactical mistake on the GOP’s part. Hillary has topped out at around a 40-45% approval rating for years now, when in the White House and when in the Senate. That seems to be her popularity cap. Obama does not have the same problem. In this case, his “inexperience” (not politically, merely his inexperience at being in the public spotlight) is in all likelihood a strength, not a weakness. Hillary Clinton’s existence in the public spotlight for 15+ years, and all of the accompanying vitriol she is endlessly subject to, is a weakness in her campaign, not the strength she no doubt wishes it were.
February 13th, 2008 at 3:01 amMIchale Weiner (Savage) was born and that hateful act is tantamount to humanity puking. He has used this hurtful act of birth the remainder of his life to bring nothing but hate and pain to all of humanity. I pray for his RAPTURE every day.
February 13th, 2008 at 7:25 amWait one minute here! Savage(less) attacks a man, who suffered a horrific life of unforgivable memories, after he dies???
Did he ever attack this man when he was alive?
Kind of sums up the chicken hawks, doesn’t it? Only attack when you are guaranteed of no counter!
Meanwhile, my thoughts and prayers go out to the family of Rep. Lantos. May he finally have peace.
February 13th, 2008 at 8:15 amIs there *anyone* who Savage doesn’t hate? When did being an all-round bastard qualify one for a radio show?
February 13th, 2008 at 9:43 am#
A quick search of the Anti-war site yielded 4 pages of articles on Exxon-Mobil. None of them supportive!
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=742 - 59k
This is only one example from that extreme Libertarian, Justin Raimondo ( with whom I have a great deal of disagreement in terms of politics)
Comment by Quizmos — February 12, 2008 @ 11:43 pm
That article is about Russian Oil, nothing about the middle east.
February 13th, 2008 at 6:28 pm