Purporting to give the “cold hard truth about international organizations” while speaking to students at Yale University yesterday, conservative hawk John Bolton said that the United States is the only country “that’s going to stop nuclear proliferation and the threats presented by Iran and North Korea.” Bolton, who once served as UN ambassador, said that when he was at Yale, he “didn’t take any courses at all on international law” and added, “frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.”
“frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Just the Brain Delivery Reunion.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:47 amYeah, why would international law matter when dealing with other countries?
February 15th, 2008 at 11:48 amWhat a spectacular choice for UN Ambassador. I’m glad to see that his utter contempt is not only reserved for the United Nations, but extends to the 5.7 billion people in this world who are not United Statesians.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:48 amHas Bolton followed through on his threat to blow up the U.N. building yet?
A∞Ω
February 15th, 2008 at 11:51 amBolton: ‘I didn’t take any courses at all on int’l law.’
No kidding.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:52 amthe United States is the only country “that’s going to stop nuclear proliferation and the threats presented by Iran and North Korea.â€
Ahhh, the little fishes again.
Hey, Bolton, take the shot with Russia and China.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:52 amAbout says it all. Shove him off in a rowboat without any oars and let the sharks take care of him. Sharks don’t follow internaitonal law either.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:54 amBolton, who once served as UN ambassador, said that when he was at Yale, he “didn’t take any courses at all on international law†and added, “frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
February 15th, 2008 at 11:56 amJust another example of a Chimpy administration member’s overwhelming qualifications……….
Is this the beginning of the “Last Throes” of the necons?
February 15th, 2008 at 11:57 amHe is not an enabler to terrorism.
Comment by Daryll
No, that is God.
God is enabling terrorists, otherwise there would be no terrorists.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:57 amSorry for feeding the troll. I will stop now.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:58 amBolton, who once served as UN ambassador, said that when he was at Yale, he “didn’t take any courses at all on international law†and added, “frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Correction : “frankly I don’t think” , is what Bolton actually meant to say……..
February 15th, 2008 at 11:58 amI do know one thing about Mr. Bolton. He is not an enabler to terrorism.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 11:56 am
Sure he is.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:59 amBolton… said that when he was at Yale, he “didn’t take any courses at all on international law†and added, “frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Ah, yes, Ignorance as a Virtue.
A time-honored Republican position.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:59 amI do know one thing about Mr. Bolton. He is not an enabler to terrorism.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 11:56 am
February 15th, 2008 at 11:59 amYeah , he’s just an enabler of stupid people ; as is obvious by your posts and appearance……..
I do know one thing about Mr. Bolton. He is not an enabler to terrorism.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 11:56 am
How does one become an enabler to an abstract concept, exactly? Is it like being a personal assistant to hubris or something?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:00 pmI do know one thing about Mr. Bolton. He is not an enabler to terrorism.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 11:56 am
Daryll has the shakes this morning. What he meant to say was ” I DON’T know one thing about Mr. Bolton.”
Daryll, Bolton isn’t a terraist enabler, he’s just a terraist, period.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:01 pmIs it like being a personal assistant to hubris or something?
Comment by toasterhead — February 15, 2008 @ 12:00 pm
That would be Mr Rove’s department.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:01 pmi shall let pass without comment that george bush also attended yale.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:02 pmYou and the other enablers should be added to the FBI list.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:01 pm
And you are the blithering idiot you project onto other people. Your comment is too silly to need refuting.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:03 pmAnd you kept it so well hidden.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:05 pmRumsfeld: “I didn’t take any courses at all on military strategy. Frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Gonzales: “I didn’t take any courses at all on the Constitution. Frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Brownie: “I didn’t take any courses at all on disaster management. Frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Cheney: “I didn’t take any courses at all on civics. Frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Bush: “I didn’t take any courses at all. Frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
February 15th, 2008 at 12:05 pmAnd you are the blithering idiot you project onto other people. Your comment is too silly to need refuting.
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — February 15, 2008 @ 12:03 pm
Yeah, but it’s hysterically funny.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:06 pmhe “didn’t take any courses at all on international law†and added, “frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Honest to goodness, the best course I ever did at university was International Law.
But I understand why Bolton might not be interested, putting constraints on the use of military force and elevating the rights of the individual just really isn’t his thing.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:06 pm“didn’t take any courses at all on international law†and added, “frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Well, if he never intended to follow international law then he probably didn’t miss anything he’ll need.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:06 pmComment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:01 pm
you speak for god?
how dare you :)
February 15th, 2008 at 12:07 pm“You enable these organizations by not allowing operatives to tap phones and utilize waterboarding.” Idiotic Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:01 pm
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
— Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), Letter to Josiah Quincy, Sept. 11, 1773.
Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not
February 15th, 2008 at 12:09 pmhave, nor do they deserve, either one.
— President Thomas Jefferson. 1743-1826
Wouldn’t that remark, made to an audience at a university he attended be, somewhat of a slap in the face, if you will?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:10 pmSee? Daryll is a parody.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:10 pmSchool is for losers.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:10 pmWe don’t need no smarty pants in the gubimint!
How dare you categorize God as a supporter of terrorism. You sir are a terrorist.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:01 pm
I like to think of myself as more of a terroirist, actually. It’s very important for wines to reflect the climate and soil composition of the regions in which they are grown.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:12 pmYou enable these organizations by not allowing operatives to tap phones and utilize waterboarding.
Saint Daryll, the Constitution Hater
Your support for trashing the Constitution makes Bin Laden the winner. His entire MO was to have Bush scurry under the table and lash out at the entire Muslim world, and have us give up our freedom so’s we wouldn’t be askeert.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:12 pmCongratulations, prick.
Why should criminals be treated like respectable people?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
Jesus was a criminal.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:13 pmYou’re right Daryll, we should throw your Constitution hating ass in jail and let the big boys have at you.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:13 pmComment by toasterhead — February 15, 2008 @ 12:12 pm
how anti-negotiante of you.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:14 pmNo, I am not, but you are an enabler. Why should criminals be treated like respectable people?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
If we torture our captives, then our soldiers will be tortured when captured. By not torturing we set an example for the rest of the world and are able to put pressure on other countries to treat our troops well when they are captured.
Also, torture has been PROVEN not to work.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:15 pmNo, I am not, but you are an enabler.
Comment by Daryll
…and we will…we will…rock you! pssssss….
*White Goodman’s Dodgeball Team*
February 15th, 2008 at 12:15 pmComment by DigDug
How dare you quote such radical leftists as the Founding Fathers to defend your position. Don’t you know that if you support the Constitution, the terrorist win!
oh….wait…
February 15th, 2008 at 12:16 pmOf course he is not talking about diplomacy. He is talking about annihalation. But then again he is wrong.
John is a bag of AIPAC blabber.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:17 pmWow, I didn’t know that freedom, democracy, and liberty had expiration dates.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:18 pmCut the bull, that was then, this is now. We are in a totally different situation that warrants these types of actions.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:17 pm
Why do you hate freedom, Daryll?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:18 pmComment by gummitch — February 15, 2008 @ 12:06 pm
True, gummitch, true. This has got to be a parody.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:18 pmDaryll is a criminal, therefore, does NOT deserve respect.
Quite logical, really.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:19 pmYale doesn’t make those courses a requirement for their degree in “belligerent asshattery”, so no surprise yosemite john didn’t take them.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:19 pmNo, I am not, but you are an enabler. Why should criminals be treated like respectable people?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
I was under the impression that we were a humane society. Has that changed since Bush stole office?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:19 pmNo, I am not, but you are an enabler. Why should criminals be treated like respectable people?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
February 15th, 2008 at 12:19 pmUmm , actually Dimwit , you are ; you support the Shrub crime family , don’t you ?
“Cut the bull, that was then, this is now. We are in a totally different situation that warrants these types of actions”
WRONG!
February 15th, 2008 at 12:19 pmAlso, torture has been PROVEN not to work.
Comment by DigDug — February 15, 2008 @ 12:15 pm
has But that’s the whole point, DigDug… nothing else BruschCo has tried worked. Torture that doesn’t work was the next logical step.
We’re # Do-h! We’re # Do-h! We’re # Do-h!
February 15th, 2008 at 12:21 pmCut the bull, that was then, this is now. We are in a totally different situation that warrants these types of actions.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:17 pm
No. The founders were in a worse situation then.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:21 pm“Cut the bull, that was then, this is now. We are in a totally different situation that warrants these types of actions.”
Anti-American Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:17 pm
Real wisdom is universal and eternal.
And anyway, I’d take the opinions Benjamin Franklin and President Thomas Jefferson over yours any day, no matter how long ago they lived.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:22 pmWow, you are too soft.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:21 pm
Aw, com’on Daryll.. admit it. The idea of torturin’ folks just gives you a chubby. I mean, if the process doesn’t produce valid intel, why else?
Daryll… our resident psuedo-Christian S&M freak!
February 15th, 2008 at 12:23 pmCut the bull, that was then, this is now. We are in a totally different situation that warrants these types of actions.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:17 pm
Sounds exactly like “situational ethics” to me.
So much for legal standards.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:23 pmWow, I didn’t know that freedom, democracy, and liberty had expiration dates.
Comment by raynman
January 21, 2001
February 15th, 2008 at 12:24 pmAl Queda does not recognize the Geneva convention. This a not a formal military organization. These are criminals!!!!! Do you remember the beheadings? Wow, you are too soft.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:21 pm
They’re not criminals until they’re put on trial and convicted by a jury. Until then, they’re merely suspects.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:24 pmJuan C I think you just made Daryll piss himself again. Bolton has had his hands dirty since his behind the scenes work in the Iran Contra scandals. He’s got his nose deep up the asses of such wholesome groups as PNAC, the AEI and JINSA (maybe they like the way his mustache tickles their collective taints. If that’s not enough, he is a second cousin to Michael Bolton (you wanna talk about torture/terror try listening to some of his crap). All in all this longtime fascist and supporter of the Zionist cause deserves nothing but ridicule for his years of bullying and blind devotion to the special interest groups he so avidly supports. He is no patriot and cares not for the advancement of the American populace. His interests lie solely in his advancement of fascist causes.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:24 pmThis Daryll is either a bad satirist,or completly loonie.I suspect the latter.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:24 pmHey wait, Daryll. By your logic, the teachings of Jesus would be invalid because, after all, that was then and this is now.
You godless atheist!
February 15th, 2008 at 12:25 pmAl Queda does not recognize the Geneva convention. This a not a formal military organization. These are criminals!!!!! Do you remember the beheadings? Wow, you are too soft.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:21 pm
February 15th, 2008 at 12:25 pmFor someone who prattles on incessantly about “God” , you sure as hell post crap that shows a complete lack of understanding of what “God” is ; not to mention a huge penchant for inhuman behavior ………
Al Queda does not recognize the Geneva convention.
Why would terrorists recognize the Geneva Conventions? If that were the case, they wouldn’t be terrorists.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:25 pmso daryll’s a parody, eh?
i knew it!
February 15th, 2008 at 12:25 pmWhy do you hate freedom, Daryll?
Comment by toasterhead
Freedom is scary. Only the courageous at heart are brave enough for true freedom.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:25 pmHey wait, Daryll. By your logic, the teachings of Jesus would be invalid because, after all, that was then and this is now.
You godless atheist!
Comment by raynman — February 15, 2008 @ 12:25 pm
And, unlike the Guantanamo detainees, Jesus was a convicted felon.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:26 pmI was under the impression that we were a humane society. Has that changed since Bush stole office?
Comment by Nat — February 15, 2008 @ 12:19 pm
Let me guess. You are receiving insight for George Soros? Bill O’Reilly had a chapter about your Secular-Progressive views in his book, “Culture Warâ€.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:24 pm
February 15th, 2008 at 12:26 pmSo George Soros is less credible or worth listening to than a perverted , lying bubblehead ?
I know there’s been some debate about this, but I don’t think Daryll is a parody.
I can see why some would come to that conclusion. But I think Daryll’s just a particularly dim bulb who thinks that by repeating the same right-wing talking points over and over, he can convince the rest of us where we’re wrong.
Hence the “dim bulb” conclusion.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:27 pmActually, Daryll, you do seem to get excited.
It’s okay, Daryll. Own it. Yer an S&M freak.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:27 pmAl Queda does not recognize the Geneva convention.
Comment by Daryll
Neither do you. Are you a member of al Qaeda?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:28 pmLet me guess. You are receiving insight for George Soros? Bill O’Reilly had a chapter about your Secular-Progressive views in his book, “Culture Warâ€.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:24 pm
Unlike conservatives who need their leaders to give them insight and direction (the lemming mentality), I have my own.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:28 pmComment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:21 pm
Aw, com’on Daryll.. admit it. The idea of torturin’ folks just gives you a chubby. I mean, if the process doesn’t produce valid intel, why else?
Daryll… our resident psuedo-Christian S&M freak!
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — February 15, 2008 @ 12:23 pm
I do not become excited towards using torture methods or going to war, but if they must be utilized to save lives, so be it.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:26 pm
February 15th, 2008 at 12:28 pmUmmm NO
There is no justification for it on any level ; and for someone like yourself who claims , along with the rest of the imbeciles that back the GOP , to being a “Christian” , shows your utter phoniness and lack of understanding of what a Christian is truly supposed to be …….
Exactly, so how would treating terrorists in a respectable way affect the way that they treat our POW’s?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:27 pm
If we don’t respect the Geneva Conventions, we’re no better than the people we’re fighting against.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:30 pmso how would treating terrorists in a respectable way affect the way that they treat our POW’s?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:27 pm
Uh… because we’re supposed to be better than them?
The experts all say… torture doesn’t work. So what purpose does it serve? Just punishment? (pssst… that makes us just like them…)
Or is it easier on your “Christian conscience” **cough** to just drop white phosphorus on them from above, so’s you don’t have to look first hand at the grotesque results of your actions?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:30 pmExactly, so how would treating terrorists in a respectable way affect the way that they treat our POW’s?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:27 pm
It wouldn’t. But it would take away several of the talking points they use to recruit impressionable young Muslims to join them. Namely, all the stuff about the United States being a nation of hypocrites who preach freedom and democracy but practice torture and indefinite detention.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:30 pmIs this liberalism?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
No, but your comment is incomprehensible.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:31 pmIn my book they were felons.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
Yeah
“My Pet Goat”
February 15th, 2008 at 12:31 pmJesus was convicted by individuals who did not believe in him and wanted to worship other idols. Is this liberalism?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
No, it’s actually conservatism. He broke the law. He was punished for it. End of story. Whether the law was just or not is irrelevant.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:32 pmIn my book they were felons. Jesus was convicted by individuals who did not believe in him and wanted to worship other idols. Is this liberalism?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
Odd. In the Book, it’s clear that the people who convicted him were other Jews, who had no intention of worshipping idols. Either you’ve never actually read the Bible or you’re lying. Which is it?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:33 pmSorry, I am against terrorisst, and If I saw one on the street, I would turn him in, unlike you.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:32 pm
How would you know that this person you saw on the street was a terrorist? Is he wearing a t-shirt that says “I USE VIOLENCE AGAINST CIVILIANS TO ACCOMPLISH STATED POLITICAL AIMS”?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:34 pmSorry, I am against terrorisst, and If I saw one on the street, I would turn him in, unlike you.
Comment by Daryll
And how would you identify him as a terrorissssst? The brown skin maybe?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:34 pmSorry, I am against terrorisst, and If I saw one on the street, I would turn him in, unlike you.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:32 pm
Give a scenario where you would see a terrorist on the street.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:35 pmIn my book they were felons. Jesus was convicted by individuals who did not believe in him and wanted to worship other idols. Is this liberalism?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
No that is crackpotism.
On what basis do you judge detainees to be felons?
On what evidence? On what rules of law?
You judge detainees, most of whom have never even been charged with a crime, to be felons, yet you judge a completed trial, conducted almost two thousand years ago, to be fraudulent based on your imagined motivations of the prosecutors.
You have an interesting take on the Rule of Law, Daryll. Not a very coherent one, but it is entertaining, in a “America’s Favorite Home Videos” kind of way.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:35 pmDISGUSTING!!!!
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:35 pm
I live in Berkeley, nimrod. I hate to burst yer fantasy bubble (not really… I rather enjoy it…) but I haven’t seen any marines nailed to any crosses around here of late.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:37 pmSorry, I am against terrorisst, and If I saw one on the street, I would turn him in, unlike you. -Daryll
Gazing into a crystal ball Daryll? Please stop projecting your unrealistic imagination on others.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:37 pmDoes anyone know if military recruiters were at CPAC?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:39 pmDaryll and his fellow Bush apologists are still trying to rule by fear. Romney made some comment yesterday, in endorsing McCain, about how this is the most dangerous time in our nation’s history. Daryll makes the same silly excuse for indecent behavior and the violation of human rights.
Romney’s comment is mind-boggling in its stupidity. I mean, hellllo! The Civil War? The Great Depression? World War II? Hell, the Cuban Missile Crisis?
The attacks of September 2001 were frightening and the loss of life was very sad. The Republicans have used this to frighten the American people into willingly giving up their rights by blowing it entirely out of proportion, and people like Daryll are the result.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:40 pmGive a scenario where you would see a terrorist on the street.
Comment by Nat
On vacation in northern Pakistan maybe?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:40 pmIs this liberalism?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
No, but your comment is incomprehensible.
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — February 15, 2008 @ 12:31 pm
For example, Jesus was nailed to the cross for his beliefs. In Berkely, CA, you liberals are nailing the Marine Corps to the cross by informing them to move out of that town, and are disabling them to restore/increase their military population. DISGUSTING!!!!
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:35 pm
You’re comparing someone that was tortured and executed for speaking up about God as the equivalent of 1 town that doesn’t want the Marines to spread propoganda and lies about how “great” the military and their benefits are out of hundreds of thousands of towns they could (re)locate to ?
Wow……….Someone desperately grasping for anything to say is quite painful to view.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:40 pmIn my book they were felons.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
Matthew 7.1-5, Daryll. Matthew 7.1-5.
Read. Contemplate. Pray. And read again.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:41 pmIn my book they were felons. Jesus was convicted by individuals who did not believe in him and wanted to worship other idols. Is this liberalism? -Daryll
In your book? Who made you a judge?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:41 pmI live in Berkeley, nimrod. I hate to burst yer fantasy bubble (not really… I rather enjoy it…) but I haven’t seen any marines nailed to any crosses around here of late.
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — February 15, 2008 @ 12:37 pm
They’re all over on Shattuck, TRoS. The sailors are nailed up down on San Pablo.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pmDoes anyone know if military recruiters were at CPAC?
Comment by Nat
No, they can’t afford to waste their time. They are too busy finding recruits.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pmIf you read G. Gordon Liddy’s book, you will notice that this issue is discussed. They are now recruiting people from the western part of the world.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:39 pm
And a convicted GOP criminal (figures) , is some sort of “speaker of truth” ?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pmFigurative speech. But you and other liberals are disabling them from accomplishing their recruiting requirements.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:41 pm
No. You can thank Bush for that.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pmYou would probably try to negotiate with the authorities to ensure that they are treated as respectable people. They are not respectable. THEY ARE CRIMINALS!!!!!!!!
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:32 pm
Respectability doesn’t enter into it. They are people, however, and should be granted the basic human rights of due process, legal representation, and protection from torture. If they are the criminals you allege, then this must be proven in a court of law.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:43 pmFigurative speech. But you and other liberals are disabling them from accomplishing their recruiting requirements.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:41 pm
I guess refuting lies with fact could somehow be construed as “disabling” ………….
February 15th, 2008 at 12:44 pmAnyone else ever notice how weird Daryll’s syntax is?
“You are disabling them”??? WTF???
“Informing them to move out of that town”???
This guy just might be a foreigner… is the RNC still outsourcing its trolling?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:44 pmThey are not respectable. THEY ARE CRIMINALS!!!!!!!!
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:32 pm
Matthew 7.1-5
February 15th, 2008 at 12:44 pmHere’s lesson #1, Mr. Bolton
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;
International law, that is the body of treaties we have signed and ratified, are OUR law.
Class dismissed.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:44 pmThere are believed to be a few individuals, who are terrorists or support terrorism in the United States.
Comment by Daryll
John Bolton and Ann Coulter, for instance.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:45 pmComment by MCMetal — February 15, 2008 @ 12:42 pm
To some people, apparently so, MC.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:45 pmBut you and other liberals are disabling them from accomplishing their recruiting requirements.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:41 pm
Actually, that’d be the two losing wars this administration embroiled us in. The Marines are not accomplishing their recruiting requirements because fewer and fewer people want to risk their lives on a lost cause.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:45 pmComment by gummitch — February 15, 2008 @ 12:42 pm
Well, that ’splains that, gummitch. Haven’t been down on San Pablo recently. Perhaps I should walk by, taunt a few, mebbe poke ‘em w/ a spear.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:47 pmComment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:47 pm
God lord… seek help, man.
This last comment is too idiotic for words.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:48 pmDoes anyone know if military recruiters were at CPAC?
Comment by Nat — February 15, 2008 @ 12:39 pm
Chicken Hawk Central??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA… now, THAT’s funny.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:48 pmThey didn’t believe/support Jesus, and the town of Berkeley doesn’t support the military.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:47 pm
Wow. I have NEVER before seen a statement by a purported “Christian” so whacked-out that they compared the military to Jesus.
I think Daryll’s gone bye-bye.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:49 pmAnd this scum bag is getting air time because……?
The walrus needs to go eat oysters….till he pukes.
Buck Fush
February 15th, 2008 at 12:49 pmOne, it is upper to the individual to conduct thorough research on this military organization before they enlist so do not blame the recruiters. Second, the actions committed by the citizens of Berkely are equivalent to the individuals who nailed him on the cross. They didn’t believe/support Jesus, and the town of Berkeley doesn’t support the military.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:47 pm
The recruitment problems are due to Bush. He has treated the military with such disdain.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:50 pmThere are believed to be a few individuals, who are terrorists or support terrorism in the United States. Comment by Daryll
The guilty dog barks first. Are you hiding a McVeigh type in your dwelling?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:51 pmGaryll’s mind went bye-bye a long, long time ago.
Why even try and debate with the sheet stain? He is touched in the head.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:54 pmOne, it is upper to the individual to conduct thorough research on this military organization before they enlist so do not blame the recruiters. Second, the actions committed by the citizens of Berkely are equivalent to the individuals who nailed him on the cross. They didn’t believe/support Jesus, and the town of Berkeley doesn’t support the military.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:47 pm
15 , 16 and 17-year old kids are easily impressionable and very readily misled.
Especially if they come from some sort of deprived , dysfunctional or less than desired background.
But even those who might live in “comfort” can be fed lies and start thinking/dreaming in a manner not consistent with reality.
And anyway ; Jesus didn’t lie about anything.
You cannot make the same claim about military recruiters ; to try and compare the 2 totally disparate and unrelated situations is disingenuous at best.
PS
February 15th, 2008 at 12:54 pmThat still doesn’t mean the people of Berkeley do not support the military or our troops.
Only to you partisan GOP/Chimpy backing ignoramuses …….
“Exactly, so how would treating terrorists in a respectable way affect the way that they treat our POW’s?”
Clueless Comment by Daryll
That’s not what I said.
I said by not torturing we set an example for the rest of the world and are able to put pressure on other countries to treat our troops well when they are captured.
There are other potential threats in the world other than AQ. Will will be at war with other countries at some point as well, and need to not have tunnel vision, only worrying about tyhe current fight.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:54 pmComment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:39 pm
And a convicted GOP criminal (figures) , is some sort of “speaker of truth†?
Comment by MCMetal — February 15, 2008 @ 12:42 pm
Who am I supposed to trust? An apologists towards terrorism like Barrack Osama.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:52 pm
When has Mr Obama ever “apologized” for terrorists or their acts ?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:55 pmWho am I supposed to trust? An apologists towards terrorism like Barrack Osama. -Daryll
Can you prove anything you post here?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:56 pmHe could take some courses on grooming.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:56 pmDaryll, seek help. Please.
Reading the Bible won’t do it, because you’re obviously incapable of understanding the text. You need a mental health professional, I’m afraid.
I only say this becaue I care.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:57 pmWow. I have NEVER before seen a statement by a purported “Christian†so whacked-out that they compared the military to Jesus.
I think Daryll’s gone bye-bye.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — February 15, 2008 @ 12:49 pm
You and other liberals just cannot accept the truth, and this has been proven by people like Bill O’Reilly.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:54 pm
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yeah , that bastion of truth and virtue , Dildo O’Lielly ; the same Dildo O’Lielly that is married and making perverted calls to a young lady who was a co-worker ?
You sure no how to pick your heroes , Daryll……..
February 15th, 2008 at 12:57 pmYou and other liberals just cannot accept the truth, and this has been proven by people like Bill O’Reilly. Comment by Daryll
Why would you as a Christian listen to a man that sexually harasses a woman?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:58 pmDaryll has to be pulling our collective legs.
His impersonation of a rightie is just too perfect, too on-message.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:58 pmThe recruitment problems are due to Bush. He has treated the military with such disdain.
Comment by Nat — February 15, 2008 @ 12:50 pm
Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
No, it is due to lies from Secular-Progressives like George Soros. At least we have stations like Fox News who try to rectify these lies.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:57 pm
FAUX Comedy Channel is a propoganda tool for the GOP…….Nothing more.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:58 pmThey are about as truthful as the Chimpy administration.
No, it is due to lies from Secular-Progressives like George Soros. At least we have stations like Fox News who try to rectify these lies.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:57 pm
It’s the Bush administration. Once Clinton or Obama wins the presidency the recruitment problems will subside.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:59 pmAgain, Daryll is what the RNC gets for trolling when they contract out to the lowest bidder.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:59 pmJesus was not for war or empire Daryll and he would allow recruiters for war into his Church if he were here today. You should BACK Berkelys choice.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:59 pm**he would NOT ALLOW
February 15th, 2008 at 12:59 pmDoes he have something to hide?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:59 pm
Wow… just… wow.
What twisted logic… no wonder the conservative movement is collapsing faster than a bad souffle in a cheap French restaurant.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:00 pmDaryll has to be pulling our collective legs.
His impersonation of a rightie is just too perfect, too on-message.
Comment by PeterW — February 15, 2008 @ 12:58 pm
If so, he’s got incredible discipline. You’d think that after this many posts, at least once he’d lose his concenration and let some intelligence slip through. But no, nothing but a steady refrain of simplistic arguments and right-wing talking points.
Daryll, if you are a parody, I salute you.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:00 pmHe doesn’t believe in waterboarding/wiretapping so, in a sense, he is apologizing to those incarcerated in Guantanmo Bay. Does he have something to hide?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:59 pm
A strong majority of this country is against water torture and no one is against wiretapping.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:01 pmHe doesn’t believe in waterboarding/wiretapping so, in a sense, he is apologizing to those incarcerated in Guantanmo Bay. -Daryll
McCain, himself, said he does not believe in torture, is he an apologist?
After months of opposition, the White House agreed Thursday to Republican Sen. John McCain’s call to ban torture by US personnel.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:01 pmhttp://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/15/torture.bill/index.html
no one is against wiretapping.
Comment by Nat — February 15, 2008 @ 1:01 pm
As long as it’s done legally…
February 15th, 2008 at 1:01 pmDaryll, if you are a parody, I salute you.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — February 15, 2008 @ 1:00 pm
I have to say, it certainly is entertaining.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:02 pmno one is against wiretapping.
Comment by Nat — February 15, 2008 @ 1:01 pm
Right. It’s the “warrantless” part we have a problem with.
Mainly because it’s in violation of the Constitution.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:03 pmDaryll thinks Jesus was the son of Pandera, the Roman Warrior and should go into battle and kill for the empire.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:03 pmThe empire crucified Jesus Daryll, why in Gods name would Jesus kill for the empire???
February 15th, 2008 at 1:04 pmHey Daryll, did the good reverand come over for a visit today?
February 15th, 2008 at 1:04 pmDid he suggest you try to save the godless folk here in the internets?
Did he and your wife slip off for some “private” soul searching?
Do you hear bed springs squeaking?
When has Mr Obama ever “apologized†for terrorists or their acts ?
Comment by MCMetal — February 15, 2008 @ 12:55 pm
He doesn’t believe in waterboarding/wiretapping so, in a sense, he is apologizing to those incarcerated in Guantanmo Bay. Does he have something to hide?
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 12:59 pm
Obama doesn’t believe in waterboarding because it is AGAINST THE LAW ; can you comprehend that ?
And your claim that he’s against wiretapping is simply an outright lie ; Jesus would not approve………..
February 15th, 2008 at 1:06 pmAt least we have stations like Fox News who try to rectumfy these lies.
Comment by Daryll
February 15th, 2008 at 1:06 pmHey, where’d Daryll go? Sumpin’ go wrong w/ tha Internets in his part of world? Another cut cable, perhaps?
February 15th, 2008 at 1:06 pmNo, it is due to lies from Secular-Progressives like George Soros. At least we have stations like Fox News who try to rectify these lies.
Comment by Daryll
What!?! How the heck does that logic work???
February 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pmComment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
Again, Daryll, I salute you in your parodic enterprise. Be strong, my friend.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pmComment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
Yet more incomprehensible gibberish…
February 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pmNo, it is due to lies from Secular-Progressives like George Soros -Daryll
George Soros is Jewish you anti-semite.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:08 pmNo, it is due to lies from Secular-Progressives like George Soros.
Comment by Daryll
This is the craziest comment yet. What lies specifically from George Soros is fueling terrorism???
February 15th, 2008 at 1:09 pmHere’s the point, until you stop supporting the proposal of bills to prohibit waterboarding/wiretapping, you will be referred to as terrorists -Daryll
Daryll thinks McCain is a terrorist?
[scroll back and read the URL I posted again]
February 15th, 2008 at 1:09 pmHere’s the point, until you stop supporting the proposal of bills to prohibit waterboarding/wiretapping, you will be referred to as terrorists. Wiretapping/Waterboarding is useful in obtaining key sensitive information from terrorists. Your views on this board indicate that you want terrorists to continue to commit their criminal acts.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
You’re pretty pathetic and an outright liar………
No one is against wiretapping here ; they are against WARRANTLESS WIRETAPPING OF FELLOW AMERICANS AND IMMUNITY FOR TELCO COs FOR COLLUSION WITH THE CHIMPY ADMINISTRATION PRIOR TO 9/11…….
Again , waterboarding is torture ; torture is illegal.
We are against illegal activities.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:09 pmSorry if that isn’t okay with you ; we’ll live , despite your disapproval
Here’s the point, until you stop supporting the proposal of bills to prohibit waterboarding/wiretapping, you will be referred to as terrorists.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
Only by the fringe Right. I can live with that.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:10 pmHere’s the point, until you stop supporting the proposal of bills to prohibit waterboarding/wiretapping, you will be referred to as terrorists. Wiretapping/Waterboarding is useful in obtaining key sensitive information from terrorists. Your views on this board indicate that you want terrorists to continue to commit their criminal acts.
Comment by Daryll
Here’s the point: until you offer any evidence that water torture is useful you are a terrorist. Until you offer any proof that bush needs warrentless wiretaps you are a facist. Your views on this board indicate that you want my government to be able to terrorize me and commit criminal acts without consequence. and your wife is cheating on you with your preacher.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:10 pmYa know, this thread was about John Bolton’s lack of education, not Daryll’s nutty, self-serving interpretation of the Bible.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:10 pmand your wife is cheating on you with your preacher.
Comment by Bobwurst — February 15, 2008 @ 1:10 pm
And that’s only fair, because Daryll is cheating on her w/ his inflatable sheep. Daisy sez “Daryll is a ba-a-a-a-d man… a ba-a-a-a-d man.”
February 15th, 2008 at 1:12 pmYa know, this thread was about John Bolton’s lack of education, not Daryll’s nutty, self-serving interpretation of the Bible.
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — February 15, 2008 @ 1:10 pm
Yeah, but the only difference that I see between the two is that Bolt-on tries to dress up his psychosis in a bizarre mutation of the Constitution, and Daryll uses a bizarre mutation of the Bible.
Otherwise, they’re exactly the same.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:13 pmno one is against wiretapping.
Comment by Nat — February 15, 2008 @ 1:01 pm
As long as it’s done legally…
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity
US law is fueling terrorism!!!!!
If we don’t break the law, the terrorists win!!!!!!
February 15th, 2008 at 1:14 pmI thought Daryll was Bolton ROS!!
February 15th, 2008 at 1:14 pmAfter months of opposition, the White House agreed Thursday to Republican Sen. John McCain’s call to ban torture by US personnel.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/15/torture.bill/index.html
Comment by Xisithrus
Since Daryll left, I’ll say it for him. That was then, and this is now. Everything has changed since 2005.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:16 pmI find it quite ironic that (R) McCains flip-flopping negates (R) Darylls flawed rational. [And funny too!]
February 15th, 2008 at 1:17 pmHere’s the point, until you stop supporting the proposal of bills to prohibit waterboarding/wiretapping, you will be referred to as terrorists.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
And as long as you continue spreading the “terror” doctrine, you are a piss-soaked troll, Chimpy-leg-humper, terrorist-enabler, IDIOT.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:17 pmTrue, ralph, true.
As a student of the absurd, you are living in The Golden Age.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:17 pmA Golden Age indeed, TRoS.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:19 pmI thought Daryll was Bolton ROS!!
Comment by Xisithrus — February 15, 2008 @ 1:14 pm
I know Bolton is a complete equine rectum, but Daryll’s sytnax is so jumbled, I kinda suspect he’s a foreigner. But then, Bolton is kind of foreign, in his own right.
Perhaps yer right… is that you, John? Giving out mustache rides?
February 15th, 2008 at 1:20 pmWhat did Will Rogers once say about coming up w/ new material, Ralph?
“All I have to do is open up the newspaper and see what Congress (and Herr Brusch) have done today…”
February 15th, 2008 at 1:22 pm“frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
You don’t know what you don’t know.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:22 pmGood Gosh Guys, GAYRLL is a total dumbass, ignore him, can you not see that he is not right in the head?
Don’t pick on the mentally challenged, it’s not nice.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:22 pmAw, Buckie… in honor of the Clemens thread, let’s put this into baseball terms.
Think of Daryll as the fungo game for those of us tuning up for the start of the 2008 Pro/Am Whack-A-Trollâ„¢ tour!
February 15th, 2008 at 1:28 pmGood Gosh Guys, GAYRLL is a total dumbass, ignore him, can you not see that he is not right in the head?
Don’t pick on the mentally challenged, it’s not nice.
Comment by Buckie Boy
Yeah, he’s pretty out of it.
What I wonder is does he really think he’s changing anyone’s mind on anything?
February 15th, 2008 at 1:32 pmCause to me it seems like the more he talks the more he just convinces everyone here that the people on side he represents are all complete clueless, wrong, idiotic, and dangerous.
Here’s the point, until you stop supporting the proposal of bills to prohibit waterboarding/wiretapping, you will be referred to as terrorists.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
Hmmm… Nope. Not gonna happen. Feel free to call me a terrorist as much as you like. :)
February 15th, 2008 at 1:35 pmHere’s the point, until you stop supporting the proposal of bills to prohibit waterboarding/wiretapping, you will be referred to as terrorists.
Comment by Daryll — February 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
Bush/Cheney/Mukasey have all sworn to defend the Constitution. They haven’t. In fact they have spent considerable time and effort finding inventive ways of undermining our laws. Bush/Cheney collaberated in the outing of a covert agent in a time of war (treason) for purely political puposes. Progressives support the unwavering defense of our Constitution and the rule of law. Daryll-of-monkeys refers to us as terrorists. Maybe Daryll-the-dim should stop reading books written by some of the most corrupt tools of the Right Wing and actually read the Constitution. I’m sure there are books available that explain our laws in a way that even Daryll would understand. Try the Children’s Books section of your local library. They may not issue a library card to someone who constantly comes in reeking of his own urin, though.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:45 pmCause to me it seems like the more he talks the more he just convinces everyone here that the people on side he represents are all complete clueless, wrong, idiotic, and dangerous.
Comment by DigDug
Nah, we already knew that.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:48 pmIt’s only appropriate that Darnell be the star of this thread. After all it is about uneducated buffons.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:48 pmOther classes Bolthead never took:
-Logic
-Geography
-History of the World Parts 1,2, and 3
take care
tony and guidedog Lido
Bush/Cheney/Mukasey have all sworn to defend the Constitution. They haven’t.
Comment by A Patriot Acting
That’s because the Constitution is fueling terrorists!!!!!
Only terrorists support the Constitution!!!!!
February 15th, 2008 at 1:50 pmcan’t expect much from a guy who thinks a 3rd-rate silver-spooner from with a fake redneck accent is “the messiah”
blasphemer – that’s all the other brother Daryll is from the divine pov.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:52 pmWow – has Daryll ever showed his true colors today. There’s no way this guy is really a Christian.
February 15th, 2008 at 2:18 pmyoud think a guy with that much power could get a better haircut.
think he sits down in the chair and tells Floyd the barber, “Give me the Howdie Doodie, please.”?
February 15th, 2008 at 2:42 pmDaryll–what form of toture do you feel Jesus prefers?
February 15th, 2008 at 2:45 pmDaryll is a cum-bubble.
February 15th, 2008 at 2:55 pmYeah… it shows!
February 15th, 2008 at 3:03 pmhe “didn’t take any courses at all on international law†and added, “frankly I don’t think I missed a thing.â€
Typical arrogance and ignorance from the another of the embarrassing fools in the boy-king’s administration.
February 15th, 2008 at 3:12 pmLogan’s Law: the stupider the right-winger, the smarter he thinks he is.
February 15th, 2008 at 3:21 pm194Comment by Perry logan
Your comment is sooooo funny!!!!! Thank you! If I may, I’ll be using that in the future!!!! It is soooo true! Thank you!
February 15th, 2008 at 3:31 pmhe “didn’t take any courses at all on international law†and added, “and I didn’t pay a damn bit of attention in the courses I DID take, either.”
February 15th, 2008 at 3:55 pmHe did, however, take every single “International Crime” course.
February 15th, 2008 at 4:06 pmWho would Jesus kill?
No, wait, that’s not right….
Who would Jesus torture?
No, that’s still not it.
Who would Jesus hate?
Damn, I’m having a hard time here.
And Bolton is the biggest tool out there. PNACer extraodinaire! How far our Ivy League schools have fallen.
All this stuff about Jesus loving you and all. I’m so confused!
February 15th, 2008 at 4:08 pmComment by tombaker — February 15, 2008 @ 4:06 pm
And he cheated on his finals, too!
February 15th, 2008 at 4:10 pmWho would Jesus kill?
No, wait, that’s not right….
Who would Jesus torture?
No, that’s still not it.
Who would Jesus hate?
Damn, I’m having a hard time here.
And Bolton is the biggest tool out there. PNACer extraodinaire! How far our Ivy League schools have fallen.
All this stuff about Jesus loving you and all. I’m so confused!
Comment by Ms_Joanne
Bolton is Jewish…….he don’t see Jesus the same way American fundies do……now you should be really confused…..or not.
February 15th, 2008 at 5:46 pmBolton is PNAC. ‘Nuff said.
February 15th, 2008 at 5:47 pmWhile we’re posting PNAC, this is their mission statement. American global domination (read: Empire) anyone?
The Project for the New American Century is a non-profit educational organization dedicated to a few fundamental propositions: that American leadership is good both for America and for the world; and that such leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy and commitment to moral principle.
The Project for the New American Century intends, through issue briefs, research papers, advocacy journalism, conferences, and seminars, to explain what American world leadership entails. It will also strive to rally support for a vigorous and principled policy of American international involvement and to stimulate useful public debate on foreign and defense policy and America’s role in the world.
William Kristol, Chairman
February 15th, 2008 at 6:36 pmit’s Wingnut Affirmative Action…except that these wingnuts are NOT qualified, and better personify that right-wing myth that the only beneficiaries of AA are D and F students…
February 15th, 2008 at 9:07 pm“I didn’t take any classes in International law.”
Yep. One can tell. Obviously Bolton missed the classes on Diplomacy as well.
February 15th, 2008 at 10:22 pmWhy doesn’t this weirdo Bolton stop trying to take out his frustrations on the rest of the world and do want he really wants to do which is go out on tour with a revival of the Village People. He can be the construction worker.
February 17th, 2008 at 7:35 pmLove that moustache…….not!