Think Progress

Christie, Ashcroft refuse to testify.

By Satyam on Feb 20th, 2008 at 4:55 pm

Christie, Ashcroft refuse to testify.»

PolitickerNJ reports that U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie and former attorney general John Ashcroft will not testify in front of a House Judiciary subcommittee next week about a lucrative federal monitoring contact Christie gave to Ashcroft. The Justice Department is refusing to say whether or not it barred Christie from testifying. The hearing has been postponed until next month.

UPDATE: Marcy Wheeler has more.




Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

31 Responses to “Christie, Ashcroft refuse to testify.”

  1. Leftside Annie Says:

    How about a litte more “contempt of Congress” fellas?

    It’s about time for another Repuke walkout.


  2. Cats r Flyfishn Says:

    Is there a statute of limitations on these investigations? Can the new Congress pursue these criminals in January 2009?


  3. Wayne Says:

    Can you spell “Contempt”?


  4. Uncle Ho Says:

    Is there no end to this buffoonery?

    Arrest them now!


  5. missmolly Says:

    Can Bush claim “executive privilege” in this situation? Will he try?


  6. Xisithrus Says:

    Cmon congress, so you been blackmailed, lets get it out in the open so America can heal itself. Its not like white collar prison is all that bad, Ney is already about to be out.


  7. Buckie Boy Says:

    Come on Congress the chimpster is down to 19%, we want you to UPHOLD THE LAW.

    Use your Inherent Contempt Law, and get your Sargent at Arms and go ARREST these Bush Toadies that are giving you the finger.

    Oh, you’re gonna write a stern letter, well that’s so much better then.

    Buck Fush


  8. Bush Cover Ups Says:

    Clinton cheating

    Bloomberg: New York count ‘fraud’
    Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:07:12

    New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg
    Mayor Michael Bloomberg says the results for the New York Democratic presidential primary suggest that ‘fraud’ has been committed.

    The New York mayor was pointing to unofficial results in which Senator Barack Obama reportedly recieved no votes in nearly 80 New York State districts.

    “If you want to call it significant undercounting, I guess that’s a euphemism for fraud,” said Bloomberg.

    Election officials have claimed that the result was but a mere ‘error’.

    Unofficial tallies have given the rising Democratic presidential hopeful no votes in 78 out of more than 6,000 election districts.


  9. Xisithrus Says:

    Get out the tin foil hats and limbaugh truth detectors!!!


  10. Shinning Light Says:

    Where is a US Marshall when you need him/her?

    Did Congress forget to fund the service?

    Oh, I forgot, they’re building the Great Wall of Texas and riding planes! - The routes to the South must be especially sought after this time of year. ……………….


  11. Wayne Says:

    Unofficial tallies have given the rising Democratic presidential hopeful no votes in 78 out of more than 6,000 election districts.
    Comment by Bush Cover Ups — February 20, 2008 @ 5:05 pm

    The most telling, not one vote tallied for Obama in Harlem’s districts where estimated 80% supported Obama.


  12. tombaker Says:

    @3 - yes - it is spelled: r-e-p-u-b-l-i-c-a-n


  13. Bushie Says:

    Did anyone expect these either of these bozos to waltz into a committee without being subpoenaed? Gumless/gaumless Conyers knew better. What game is he playing?


  14. Pursang Says:

    Give a call to the GAO, I’m sure they’d love to send an audit team to review the contract.


  15. webslinger Says:

    remember that Ashcroft is now a private citizen…..he cannot claim executive privilege (not that he could have anyway….). If he refuses to testify (or at least plead the ‘fif’), then he’s really screwed (at least until the pardon).

    And for all the trolls….its stuff like this that causes the 19% approval rating….so yeah, its pretty legit despite your claims!


  16. RUCerious Says:

    Should these jackasses be subjected to extraordinary rendition to a secret location in Eastern Europe, to have enhanced interrorgation techniques applied until they spill their guts?

    All in favor?


  17. RUCerious Says:

    Let’s show Ashcroft some Inherent Contempt, and see how he likes the DC jail.


  18. gus smith Says:

    Hearing postponed because Ashcroft and Christie refuse to testify? What sort of investigative system is that? The more obvious and corrupt, the greater opportunity to slip through the cracks of the system. Instead, call for an immediate hearing telling the possible criminals that they must appear and have the ultimatum delivered by the Federal Marshall’s Office.


  19. Doc Rock Says:

    Actually, its impeachment time!


  20. Marcus Aurelius Says:

    “I don’t want to.”

    I don’t want to? Did they say, “I don’t want to?”

    Since when is answering a summons a choice?

    These clowns need to be hauled before Congress in chains, have their bank accounts seized, and then be taken to a secret location for at least a year with no access to family, lawyers, or anyone else.

    Goddamned criminals.


  21. webslinger Says:

    Marcus (6:11pm),

    Actually….answering a summons is ALWAYS a choice. The named party can ALWAYS refuse service……but there are ALWAYS consequences. Well, at least for the rest of us normal folks.

    The worst part of Congress’ lack of action is the precedent it is setting by not performing its constitutionally mandated duties…watch, in the future every defendant will simply say, “I chose not to comply because in the case of Congress v. Ashcroft, Meirs, Bush, Cheney, etc, the courts held that defendants may use a subpoena or summons as toilet paper.”.


  22. bilbobaggins Says:

    The lawlessness of this administration knows no bounds. Time for Inherent Contempt. It’s the only thing that will work. If Congress allows them to throw this stuff into the court system, they will run out the clock.

    I really want to see these people put into handcuffs by the Sargent at Arms and frog marched down into the jail in the cellar.


  23. bilbobaggins Says:

    remember that Ashcroft is now a private citizen…..he cannot claim executive privilege (not that he could have anyway….). If he refuses to testify (or at least plead the ‘fif’), then he’s really screwed (at least until the pardon).
    Comment by webslinger

    Harriett Meiers is a private citizen and Bush claimed EP for her.


  24. leftcoast Says:

    Not to be an apologist, but to postpone is not refusal. TP, lets not jump the gun.


  25. Marie Says:

    The former Attorney General of the United States has put himself in contempt of court.
    Every one of these Bush cronies feels he is above the law.
    Of course, the laws are written only for us peons, not the elite.


  26. zuch Says:

    Can’t they just “plead the Fifth” and be done with it, so we’ll know what kind of a maladinistration you gte when you elect Rethuglicans?

    Cheers,


  27. billyjoejimbob Says:

    Did somebody say “Letter time”?


  28. Ms_Joanne Says:

    If the dems in congress don’t start to enforce these things, they are not doing their job of oversight.

    Screw the letters…send in the US Marshals and get that jail cell in the congressional building all prepped for all of these damned criminals.

    This is getting old.

    DO SOMETHING!


  29. questioneverything Says:

    If any Senator who voted to confirm Mukasey believes he is “independent,” I have an island in New York they might want to buy. Would that be you, Senator Schumer? Oh, what a mess we are in. I continue to believe there is some kind of stupid juice chemical weapon being given to members of congress. Can’t anybody do anything?


  30. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    I really want to see these people put into handcuffs by the Sargent at Arms and frog marched down into the jail in the cellar.

    Comment by bilbobaggins — February 20, 2008 @ 6:30 pm

    I would die a happy Republic… **sniff…**


  31. Wayne Says:

    I really want to see these people put into handcuffs by the Sargent at Arms and frog marched down into the jail in the cellar.
    Comment by bilbobaggins — February 20, 2008 @ 6:30 pm

    Wouldn’t that be a pre 911 We 911 Gonna 911 Die! cowardly pants-pissing belly-flopping lapdog “Tableless Nancy” Congress?

    I wish this Congress would grow that much spine……


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image image
What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



Reports

imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll