Here’s the link to the information:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56626

If he passes the lie detector test Obama will be finished. McCain will go under with the lobbyist fiasco. A big trial in California has just been put on the docket naming Hillary and Bill Clinton as defendants. She’ll be done. Let’s see, who’s left?

Ralph Nader.

He’s done nothing wrong. You’re just being emotional and erratic. No surprise there.

Comment by thirdparty — February 23, 2008 @ 1:27 pm

He dishonored himself during Viet Nam, so start with, and dishonored himself again as one of the Keating 5, and dishonored himself again by giving Bush blowjobs after the character assassiantion against him in 2000, and dishonored himself again by lying about his payoffs and favors for the dozens of lobbyists that purchase his whores for him. He’s filthy, as dirty as they come. Y*ou can defend him down in the muck, you seem comfortable in the gutter.

Comment by Lefty Patriot — February 23, 2008 @ 5:02 pm

I think it’s funny how you edited my statement that you quoted, which began with: “Care to back any of that up?” Instead, you don’t provide any proof on your Keating attacks or your Swift Boating of his Vietnam record (oh, never mind, can you really call it a Swift Boating when you don’t even pretend to make up evidence?). You talk about lying about “payoffs” and “favors.” Care to identify the lie? All that’s come out is a question on whether he ever met with Paxson about the letters; he never denied writing the letter. But as we’ve seen, Paxson has been contradicted by a former executive of his.

I think you’re the dishonorable one. Well, not like honor matters when you can be an armchair character assassin.

Comment by thirdparty — February 23, 2008 @ 1:27 pm

He dishonored himself during Viet Nam, so start with, and dishonored himself again as one of the Keating 5, and dishonored himself again by giving Bush blowjobs after the character assassiantion against him in 2000, and dishonored himself again by lying about his payoffs and favors for the dozens of lobbyists that purchase his whores for him. He’s filthy, as dirty as they come. Y*ou can defend him down in the muck, you seem comfortable in the gutter.

it’s going to help Mccain into a prison cell. he is one of the dirtiest of all conservative politicians, and that’s really dirty. McStain has been a hypocrite, liar and thief his entire career, including his hotel vacation in VietNam, a complete sham.

Comment by Lefty Patriot — February 23, 2008 @ 12:51 pm

Care to back any of that up? He’s done nothing wrong. You’re just being emotional and erratic. No surprise there.

Comment by thirdparty — February 23, 2008 @ 3:49 am

it’s going to help Mccain into a prison cell. he is one of the dirtiest of all conservative politicians, and that’s really dirty. McStain has been a hypocrite, liar and thief his entire career, including his hotel vacation in VietNam, a complete sham.

Comment by good_golly — February 23, 2008 @ 11:38 am

Thanks for showing us the Obama has no connection whatsoever to Rezko’s troubles. Well done.

Three political aides on Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) payroll were registered lobbyists for dozens of corporations, including Wal-Mart, British Petroleum and Lockheed Martin, while they received payments from his campaign, according to public documents.

The presence of political operatives with long client lists on Obama’s campaign contrasts with his long-held stand of campaigning against the influence of special interests. Obama has even refused to accept contributions from lobbyists or political action committees (PACs).

It’s amusing to me that the left wants to assail McCain’ on ethics, when in fact he has arguably the best record on ethics in politics. Between campaign finance and pork barrel spending, what he’s done has been admirable.

So what to make of the NY Times story? For one, it helps McCain with conservatives. Also, I think that whenever the conversation is about ethics, it helps McCain.

[h/t] Me?
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/22/mccain-witholds-judgment-on-renzi-indictment#comment-4276505

.

I would have voted for this guy in 2000, now I’m realizing I was duped.

Barf…

Comment by Zooey

Recently I gave a cell phone that was no longer used to charity [abused homeless women] so they could call 911 without having to activate a phone. And they said to make sure to delete all the cell phobe pics because some guys, apparently, were sticking their tallywhacker inside Hot Dog buns and photographing them.

Yeh, true. =P

I believe a lot of things that never would have occurred to me. :)

Comment by Zooey

Can you believe that some people abuse jars of Peter Pan peanut butter like that

I get it — he’s nucking futs.

Pick your Facist…

Corp Facist? MSM? Israeli Suckups?

or

Rush Limbaugh Type Urine Soaked, Knee Knockin’, Fanatical, Jesus Mongering, Racist, Lily-White Male, Ghoul-Aid Guzzling, Misogynist, Child Molesting, Uber-Gay, Mouth Breathing, Christianista Criminals?

Of course the Corp, MSM, Israeli Suckup Facist will use the other facist for whatever gains can be achieved!!!!

It’s hard to sort out the 2 piles of Facist sh|t most of the time!!!