Lets say I agree that it is a hit piece. Not that Billo doesn’t do his hits every day on radio and TV at his enemies expense. But so I agree its a hit piece.

-So we kill the hitter.

-Is the piece true or false?

-If true, it wasn’t a hit after all.

This is the conservative ideology here. Look at President Bush’s policy on “Whistle Blowers”.
If a person sees a crime, reports it, The person stopping the stopping the crime become the criminal………

Conservatives world of justice….

Larry Sinclair took his polygraph lie detector test today and results will be out Monday or Tuesday.

By the way, that is who O’Reilly was talking about most probably. He allegedly did drugs and had sex with Barack Obama in 1999. This man has also filed a law suit in Minnesota. Should be very interesting to see if Obama is actually telling the truth here.

“And that Democrat’s name is Gary Hart. Shocking.”

I agree, if we have people like Bay Buchanan who say with a straight face that they expect GOP candidates to be loyal to their families because adultery is only a Democratic Party thing, then yes, his infidelity in addition to his connection with lobbyists is fair game…

Comment by good_golly — February 22, 2008 @ 11:48 am

Oh and gone_goofy, as a second generation, lifelong Chicago, Larry Sinclair or al Cracker, is no Chicagoan. His hotel room in Gurnee that is almost in Wisconsin that’s over an hour north of Chicago and 5 hours north of Springfield. Freakin’ Gurnee! You mean Larry Sinclair has been to Bass Pro Shops, gee who could have guessed by looking at him. You, O’Reilly, Snow – BRING IT ON. If you think the NYTimes article rallied conservatives around McCain, try smearing Obama over sex and drugs. We’re progressives, we LIKE sex and drugs, dumbass.

Go ahead, O’Reilly. If you peddle a rumor off on some Democrat, then you’ll find out very quickly what a Slander lawsuit feels like. Now, if McCain feels the article in the NYT has no basis in fact, he’s certainly free to file a Libel suit. I’m all for this asshat having his day in court. Discovery should go very well into figuring out if he did this or not. If he didn’t, well, then he’ll get justice and we’ll see this is just another instance of politicking. If he did, then…well, sucks to be him, and he’ll lose the support of the republican fundies they need to win.

As for the trolls, I like SHayne’s idea…both flag them AND send the posts through ‘Contact Us’. Also, the trolls are fighting SOO hard to turn this into a non-issue. Why here? Who cares what ‘a bunch of loonie moonbats’ think? Could it be that they’re rightly afraid that our posts reflect the majority of the US today? Are they afraid that they’re going to lose the presidency? I think so.

THe Republicans are suffering today because of their choices in the past. Had Bush stuck to Afghanistan, followed the rule of law, balanced the budget, used decorum when dealing with our friends and foes internationally, and basically didn’t trample our liberties, then you trolls wouldn’t hear any arguements from us Independents about him. But no, he decided to run this country into the ground. The chickens are coming home to roost, and some little article from the NYT won’t make a hill of beans difference on that.

Hint: THis is just icing on the cake. The cake? It spells out one word. It’s four letters long, starts with a B, and ends with an h.

Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — February 22, 2008 @ 12:27 pm

The fastest way to get rid of posts is to copy them and go up to the contact us window and ask them why they’re letting this stuff stay. Just flagging them doesn’t seem to work as well. Morning fluffy.

No one else benefits from the timing of this story but McCain.