Think Progress

Fallon: Afghanistan is bad, but Iraq is worse.

On CTV’s Question Period yesterday, Centcom chief Adm. William Fallon claimed that “we’re not nearly as bad as some would have you believe in Afghanistan.” Though he acknowledged that there has been a “huge upsurge in horrible things that go on in Afghanistan,” Fallon said he’s not fazed by the increase because it pales in comparison to Iraq:

I look at Iraq and what I’ve been dealing with over there, and there’s no comparison in the magnitude of the number of events and so forth.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/FallonAfghanistanIraq.320.240.flv]


30 Responses to “Fallon: Afghanistan is bad, but Iraq is worse.”

  1. tombaker says:

    So both are going pretty poorly.


  2. missmolly says:

    What is this — a contest to see which area of the world we’ve messed up the most?


  3. hellinabucket says:

    I agree with the Adm. The amount that’s been f%$ked up in Iraq is so much more than what’s been f#$ked up in Afghanistan. That’s not a vote of confidence for either front.


  4. McWars says:

    Write it on your surgescription pad, Admiral.


  5. McWars says:

    2. More like which still needs more of our attention.

    Comment by good_golly — February 25, 2008 @ 4:09 pm

    Only the caves containing Bin Laden and his cohorts deserve our attention. The Iraqi people don’t think we deserve anything, so our attention isn’t needed there. It’s time to relieve the stress on the forces and use our military resources wisely. Right behind the troops, cutting insane spending at DoD is another priority.


  6. belac says:

    The Surge is working!
    As soon as we get the oil flowing then we can turn our attention to the Afgan pipeline… got to prioritize.


  7. RUCerious says:

    Uh, Admiral, you’re swiftboat is arriving at Pier 86…


  8. impeachcheneythenbush says:

    Frankly, I couldn’t find any reference to his saying “horrible things” in the linked article. However, I did find something I found quite ironic.

    “He did caution that the Taliban “pays close attention” to what happens in countries that supply troops to Afghanistan and gain confidence “if they perceive there’s little commitment – or it’s words and not a lot of action to back it up.”

    “And that’s certainly not the mindset we want to leave them with,” Adm. Fallon said”

    What kind of impression do you suppose our committing very few troops to Afghanistan early on or now, then changing our focus to Iraq, left on the Taliban?


  9. tombaker says:

    Let’s borrow 100 trillion dollars from the chinese and use it to send all the 18-40 year olds to Iraq forever – then we will surely win.


  10. Bush Cover Ups says:

    Afghanistan is lost , were all leaving once Bush gets out of power


  11. Leftside Annie says:

    Yeah, gee, that’s exactly like asking someone, “what would *you* rather die from, a heart attack or cancer?”

    Well, like, um, they both involve death and they BOTH suck….kinda like our two-front war.


  12. Bush Cover Ups says:

    Europeans are tiring of their role as an European proxy for America’s legions, and the NATO commander speaks of a NATO defeat in Afghanistan.

    NATO was an alliance created to resist a Soviet invasion of Europe. The U.S. has kept an unnecessary NATO alive for 18 years as a source of troops for its foreign adventures. Europeans dislike being mercenaries for an American empire, especially one that slaughters civilians.


  13. Bush Cover Ups says:

    Desperate for troops, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates is trying to scare Europeans with the threat of “international terrorism,” but Europeans know that the best way to bring terrorism to Europe is to send troops to fight Muslims for the Americans. Whether Gates will get the German and French soldiers that he so desperately needs depends on whether the U.S. can give the German and French leaders, Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy, enough billions of dollars to divide among their parties to embolden them to override public opinion and send their soldiers to die for U.S. and Israeli hegemony in the Middle East.


  14. Bush Cover Ups says:

    What a total crock of ignorance and deception the Bush regime represents. Bush, defeated in Iraq, defeated in Afghanistan, with Pakistan crumbling in front of his eyes, is now reduced to begging the French, whom it was such grand sport for his neocon officials to denigrate, to send soldiers to save his ass in Afghanistan.


  15. Little Freep Goofballs says:

    More like which still needs more of our attention.

    Comment by good_golly — February 25, 2008 @ 4:09 pm

    gg’s contribution to the war on islamofascism – paying attention.


  16. Bush Cover Ups says:

    ‘Libya will not vote for Iran sanction’

    Libya’s UN ambassador, Giadalla Ettalhi, says his country cannot support further UNSC sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.


  17. Bushie says:

    In a few weeks Adm. Fallon will announce his retirement to “spend more time with my family”.


  18. tombaker says:

    0-2 – maybe dubbie should hurry up and find a smaller country to take on so he doesn’t go down as the first Pres. ever to start and lose 2 wars.


  19. BillinChicago says:

    Yes, the violence in both Afghanistan and Iraq goes on and on, with no end in sight. Could that possibly be because we have a traitor for a President who refuses to lift a finger against those actually attacking us?

    http://www.asecondlookatthesaudis.com


  20. Wayne says:

    Shorter Fallon: “Afghanistan is bad, but Iraq is totally f_cked up”


  21. robertoroberto says:

    Yes. Compared to Iraq, Afghanistan looks good. Excellent point. That’ll make those doubters swallow their words. I just did an interview with Toronto Star writer Linda McQuaig on the issue of Afghanistan and she’s as concerned about the mess in Afghanistan as i am. It looks as if Canada will be taking somewhat of a lead-role over there too. Tragic.


  22. gummitch says:

    TP. Fallon is “not fazed”. Not “not phased”, unless he’s the admiral on a Star Trek episode.


  23. Badger says:

    I truly wish Admiral Fallon had been head of Centcom from the beginning. He strikes me as one CANDID admiral.


  24. williamf says:

    This almost sounds like straight talk? What’s up with this? Can we get some of this from our grammar disabled President? Huh?


  25. mary says:

    I just did an interview with Toronto Star writer Linda McQuaig

    Comment by robertoroberto — February 25, 2008 @ 5:04 pm

    Cool!

    Yes, Canada has been pulled into the quagmire that is Afghanistan. Canadian troops have traditionally been only for peacekeeping and now they’re part of the killing.


  26. robertoroberto says:

    “Yes, Canada has been pulled into the quagmire that is Afghanistan. Canadian troops have traditionally been only for peacekeeping and now they’re part of the killing.”

    Exactly! We discussed the evolution of the America-Canada relationship and what it means now for North America. The idea being that America is dragging other countries along for its dangerous ride. Unfortunately you don’t here much kicking and screaming from Mr.Harper over here though. It’s the same story as America really – Weak opposition party giving the party in power free reign, meanwhile the Canadian death toll in the country rises now almost on a weekly basis.


  27. osage says:

    Bush is deliberately pertpetuating a no-win scenario so that Democrats must manage the unmanageable chaos he has created. And then, of course, he’ll blame them for all death and destruction created by his failures! Bush should be tried for crimes against humanity and sentenced to solitary confinement for the remainder of his murderous miserable life.


  28. Max-1 says:

    .

    Another: “Bring it on…” mentality at play.

    .


  29. SeattleJoe says:

    This is the guy most responsible for keeping us from attacking Iran, probably.

    Fallon:Not on my Watch.

    Canada and a lot of European countries are having second thoughts about having troops in Afghanistan. Presumably that is why he is on Canadian TV.


  30. robertoroberto says:

    Exactly SeattleJoe, many Canadians are against the combat mission in Afghanistan. As a peacekeeping nation, Canadians feel they should be working with nations to solve crises by diplomacy. Their Prime-minister has other ideas. There’s a large disconnect between Canadians and their politicians on this issue.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll