Think Progress

EPA Staff Urged Administrator To Resign If He Denied California Emissions Waiver

bushjohsn.gif In December, EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson denied California a waiver that would have allowed 16 states to implement landmark automobile greenhouse emissions reductions — against the advice of EPA staffers, who told Johnson that “California met every criteria” for the waiver request.

According to documents released by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today, EPA staff members believed Johnson “might have to consider resigning” if he turned down the waiver. A staff memo prepared for the head of EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality to present to Johnson urged:

The eyes of the world are on you. … You have to find a way to get this done. If you cannot, you will face a pretty big personal decision about whether you are able to stay in the job under those circumstances. This is a choice only you can make, but I ask you to think about the history and the future of the agency in making it. If you are asked to deny this waiver, I fear the credibility of the agency that we both love will be irreparably damaged.

In a press conference today, Boxer displayed a document from May 1, 2007, when Johnson was to meet with White House staff to discuss the waiver. Johnson carried papers “in his pocket” urging him to grant the waiver, but he buckled to the White House, Boxer remarked:

A funny thing happened on the way to the White House. … Mr. Johnson goes into the White House with a briefing that tells him to fight for the waiver. And then, the waiver’s not granted.

Staff even thought they made headway with Johnson. “I think Johnson now better appreciates that there are additional conditions in CA that make them vulnerable to climate change,” said a Climate Change division staff on October 31, 2007. Nevertheless, Johnson overrode their advice in the end.

Johnson’s injection of President Bush’s politics into science is notorious. Earlier this year, he censored documents with white duct tape on the EPA’s decision-making process on the California waiver. Asked whether global warming was “a major crisis” facing the world, Johnson replied, “I don’t know what you mean by major crisis.”

Ironically, Boxer said today that the documents revealed an EPA “in crisis.”



37 Responses to “EPA Staff Urged Administrator To Resign If He Denied California Emissions Waiver”

  1. RUCerious says:

    “If you are asked to deny this waiver, I fear the credibility of the agency that we both love will be irreparably damaged.”

    Mistake #1: Assuming Johnson loved anything other than swallowing BushitCo ejectum.


  2. toasterhead says:

    Heckuva job, Johnnie.


  3. Theresa says:

    Something familiar, something peculiar
    Something for everyone: a comedy tonight
    Something appealing, something appalling
    Something for everyone: a comedy tonight

    Lyrics by Stephen Sondheim


  4. A Patriot Acting says:

    Looks like our friend Dick sat Johnson down and showed him some of the incriminating stuff that the Administration has data mined on him. “Now get in line Stephen and do our bidding. Nothing to see here, unless of course you don’t cooperate.”


  5. McWars says:

    The good people in this country are imprisoned by corporate whores, and Bush the corrupt warden leads the way with his fellow criminal cohorts, or the guards.

    There’s no shortage of psychopathic, money-grubbing trash in America, unfortunately.


  6. robbez_92107 says:

    A Bush appointee worried about credibility? Never.
    You sign away that concern in the “loyalty agreements.”


  7. For Whom The Bell Tolls says:

    Please REMEMBER, it’s not our politicians that will do the work. Greed is alive and well in America. It is “WE THE PEOPLE” that must stand together to MAKE SURE our desires are met; Not the politicians.

    Be the change you want to see in America, and the World.


  8. dictatortot says:

    The Bushies also circumvented California’s medicinal marijuana law. What good is a referendum (in this case, a reefer-endum) if the feds can overturn it so easily?

    http://newsprism.wordpress.com


  9. Zimzone says:

    I watched Johnson ignore the truth in the congressional hearing on this.

    No matter how they presented the case for emission controls in CA, he ignored the realities of the proposal & impact of doing nothing.

    This is the only waiver never granted by the EPA, even though he himself admitted it met all established criteria.

    This rings a familiar tone heard at the Justice dept, where staffers encouraged the ‘big guy’ to do the right thing.

    Doing the right thing is a concept the Bush WH is unfamiliar with.


  10. shoeless says:

    A funny thing happened on the way to the White House. … Mr. Johnson goes into the White House with a briefing that tells him to fight for the waiver. And then, the waiver’s not granted.

    If was esay. They simply showed him Dick Cheney’s empty man-sized safe and wa la, waiver not granted.


  11. natisman says:

    So do ya think he want to spend more time with the family, looking out over amber waves of grain? I think not!


  12. shoeless says:

    The Bushies also circumvented California’s medicinal marijuana law. What good is a referendum (in this case, a reefer-endum) if the feds can overturn it so easily?

    Comment by dictatortot

    Oh, you leftys and your foolish dreams of democracy. Didn’t you learn in Nov. 2000 that your votes no longer count.


  13. Mr. Evil says:

    I just cannot understand why one person, just one, could have an epiphany and simply stand up and say, “I can’t take it anymore!” And reveal just what Bush and Cheney and the other neocons have really been up to all along (besides what we already know). One person, to become human again. To realize that the constitution is not just a piece of paper. To wake up and understand the morality is much more than just blind faith in another man’s ideology. One person, under oath, to expose the mountain of lies and deceit once and for all. Isn’t there just one?

    As for our Democratic presidential hopefuls don’t count on too much “change.” Just follow their money trail and find out who their pimps are. This country is in trouble.


  14. Wayne says:

    “To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.

    The deliberate betrayal of its trust by the Republican party, the fatal incapacity of the Democratic party to deal with the new issues of the new time, have compelled the people to forge a new instrument of government through which to give effect to their will in laws and institutions.”

    That was from the Progressive Party platform of 1912.
    Too bad they gave up on the party back then, because “The Song Remains the Same”.


  15. RUCerious says:

    Wayne, do you suppose it’s too late to resurrect this, one hundred years later?
    Nader sure as hell isn’t the answer, except to the question, who got McCain elected in 08?


  16. bilbobaggins says:

    If you are asked to deny this waiver, I fear the credibility of the agency that we both love will be irreparably damaged.

    And that is exactly what has happened.

    Oh well, President Obama will turn it all around.


  17. bilbobaggins says:

    “President Obama”. Isn’t it nice to have something to look forward to for a change?


  18. Keith H. says:

    Ironically, Boxer said today that the documents revealed an EPA “in crisis.”

    The EPA must be a little late in joining the ‘in crisis’ party that the United States has been involved in since the day junior was installed.

    Memo to Nancy:

    Shit or get off the pot sweetheart.


  19. Mr. Evil says:

    Nancy Pelosi is useless.


  20. bilbobaggins says:

    I just cannot understand why one person, just one, could have an epiphany and simply stand up and say, “I can’t take it anymore!” And reveal just what Bush and Cheney and the other neocons have really been up to all along (besides what we already know).

    I suspect it is because these people know that, if they stood up and told the world what the Bush Cabal has been doing, they would have to go into the Witness Protection Program if they had any chance to stay alive.


  21. tombaker says:

    Our Civil professionals aren’t going to know what to do with themselves once the blight of Republican corruption is removed from their Agencies. I hope enough of them remain from “before the darkness” to help get back on track, and doing the work all Americans need them to do.


  22. raynman says:

    I think that before we can talk about climate change in this country… we’re going to need a regime change….


  23. Wayne says:

    Wayne, do you suppose it’s too late to resurrect this, one hundred years later?
    Nader sure as hell isn’t the answer, except to the question, who got McCain elected in 08?

    Comment by RUCerious — February 26, 2008 @ 2:00 pm

    Too late for 2008, but is it is started early 2009, and if the Democrats still act like they have in the 110th Congress, we may have a chance to try to replace some ineffective Congressional idiots in 2010 and maybe run a presidential candidate for 2012.

    But we will need some good people with name recognition to put themselves behind such a movement, if there are any that haven’t been bought out yet.


  24. Wayne says:

    Oh well, President Obama will turn it all around.

    Comment by bilbobaggins — February 26, 2008 @ 2:02 pm

    He is getting my vote, so we shall see.

    Dodd came out today endorsing Obama. I got the email from Dodd this morning ( I was one of his campaign donors ).


  25. Mr. Evil says:

    If Obama chooses John Edwards as his veep then he has my vote.


  26. Wayne says:

    Memo to Nancy:

    Shit or get off the pot sweetheart.

    Comment by Keith H. — February 26, 2008 @ 2:03 pm

    You have to get one of her Corporate donors to tell her that for it to be effective.


  27. Doc Rock says:

  28. impeachcheneythenbush says:

    This isn’t directly related to the EPA issue, but is simply one more horrible example of what this administration has done and continues to try to do to our nation’s heritage. And Pelosi took impeachment “off the table?” The House needs new, more progressive and more courageous leadership, that’s for sure!

    Bush Administration Strips Protections from America’s Largest Forest
    Pristine Areas Targeted for Logging

    Juneau, AK (January 25, 2008) — Today, the Bush administration took its third swipe in recent weeks at opening protected areas in America’s national forests to logging before it leaves office. A Bush plan announced today puts a “for sale” sign on trees in vast swaths of the nation’s largest national forest – the Tongass rainforest in Alaska.

    This move by Bush officials to reverse roadless area protections joins two others made recently in the national forests located in Idaho and Colorado.

    “The few remaining roadless areas of our national forests are some of the only safe harbors for America’s wildlife. As global warming threatens to change dramatically the landscape we must have the foresight to preserve these last remaining pristine forests for future generations,” said Mary Beth Beetham at Defenders of Wildlife. “It’s folly for the Bush administration, in its last few months, to work to destroy these areas.”

    The Bush administration’s just-released management plan for the Tongass National Forest in Alaska puts millions of pristine acres in this ancient rainforest on the auction block to the timber industry, yet will raise no revenue for the U.S. government, as the U.S. taxpayers themselves will have to pay to build the roads the timber companies need to access the forest. The Tongass is the largest national forest in the country.

    http://www.nrdc.org/media/2008/080125a.asp


  29. DieNowForPeace says:

    Somebody, somewhere, please exhibit some integrity.

    I was once given a similar option (do what we say, or resign).

    Money has never been my life’s focus, rather, quality of life as I see fit.

    So I told them to go to hell, and my life’s been so much better than if I had “towed the line”.

    Far too many put money ahead of the morals.


  30. Wayne says:

    Memo to Nancy:

    Shit or get off the pot sweetheart.

    Comment by Keith H. — February 26, 2008 @ 2:03 pm

    Have to add:

    Remember when Cindy Sheehan and Think Pink, tried to deliver an Impeachment petition to Nancy, when she refused to see them, they delivered to Conyers, then Sheehan was arrested.

    Pelosi doesn’t give a damn what the people have to say


  31. Wayne says:

    An impeachment petition with over a million signatures didn’t matter to Pelosi, probably because it didn’t come with a campaign donation…..


  32. VerbalKint says:

    “If you are asked to deny this waiver, I fear the credibility of the agency that we both love will be irreparably damaged.”

    Well, damaging the credibility of EVERY federal agency is the explicit goal of the Bush administration. They are determined to prove that government can’t work, by undercutting it in every possible way at every possible opportunity.

    Why isn’t this treason?


  33. DrColes says:

    Over 400 World Wide Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007. See http://tinyurl.com/2dv6nz


  34. Lefty Patriot says:

    Over 400 World Wide Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007. See http://tinyurl.com/2dv6nz

    Comment by DrColes — February 26, 2008 @ 5:58 pm

    What, this crap again. A small group of oil-funded morons, again?


  35. skimadsa says:

    Check this link from Techfun – to “dispute” the “disputed”!



  36. batteries says:

    And reveal just what Bush and Cheney and the other neocons have really been up to all along (besides what we already know). One person, to become human again. To realize that the constitution is not just a piece of paper. To wake up and understand the morality is much more than just blind faith in another man’s ideology. One person, under oath, to expose acer travelmate 3200 battery,acer 3ur18650f-3-qc151 battery the mountain of lies and deceit once and for all. Isn’t there just one?

    As for our Democratic presidential hopefuls don’t count on too much “change.”



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll