Monica Goodling, the former White House Liason for the Justice Department who played a central role in the U.S. attorney scandal, is reportedly engaged to RedState founder Michael Krempasky. The “story” of Goodling and Krempasky — whom Above the Law deigns a “power couple” — “goes back more than a decade and originates outside the Beltway.”
yeah..both their moms belonged to a freedom haters support group. that’s how they met.
February 26th, 2008 at 10:05 amhttp://www.tshirtinsurgency.com
Truly a match made in hell.
February 26th, 2008 at 10:07 amThere’s a strong argument for mandatory sterilization if there ever was one.
February 26th, 2008 at 10:14 amThe “story†of Goodling and Krempasky — whom Above the Law deigns a “power couple†— “goes back more than a decade and originates outside the Beltway.â€
February 26th, 2008 at 10:15 amUnfortunately, neither can recall the exact circumstances surrounding their first meeting- neither can recall the exact wording used in Krempasky’s proposal- and neither can recall exactly whose idea the marriage was in the first place… the couple is registered at Macy’s and will make their home at an undisclosed location.
I have the perfect wedding gift to send–a bag of dogshit.
February 26th, 2008 at 10:21 amget married fast monica…..otherwise your honeymoon might be pre empted by the high crimes tribunal
February 26th, 2008 at 10:22 amComment by Uncle Ho — February 26, 2008 @ 10:21 am
Shoot and I was all set to order them monagramed matching orange jumpsuits… :0
February 26th, 2008 at 10:30 amRadRight; hey, those gifts would compliment each other (:-D)
February 26th, 2008 at 10:35 amI think I’m going to be sick. For the first time ever I’d actually rather read about anything related to Britney Spears.
February 26th, 2008 at 10:38 am“This just in: the super-fabulous Monica Goodling,” this is a quote from the Above the Law web site. Super-fabulous huh, sounds like a quote from a teeny bopper magazine.
February 26th, 2008 at 10:58 amDo they allow conjugal visits in federal prisons?
February 26th, 2008 at 11:02 amWill her wedding vows or her oath of loyalty to GWB trump?
February 26th, 2008 at 11:04 amI hope she have every happines which she deserves!
February 26th, 2008 at 11:04 amThanks a lot, Shayne. There’s goes any chance I had of keeping breakfast down this morning.
February 26th, 2008 at 11:04 amMonica Goodling: Future Stepford Wife.
February 26th, 2008 at 11:12 amAwwwww. Isn’t that special?
February 26th, 2008 at 11:22 amHow convoluted will there vows be? I wonder if they are having Gonzales write them?
February 26th, 2008 at 11:27 amThanks a lot, Shayne. There’s goes any chance I had of keeping breakfast down this morning.
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — February 26, 2008 @ 11:04 am
Well if they tape the visits we could sell them as a diet aid, partner.
February 26th, 2008 at 11:29 amI hope this marriage brings them everything they deserve.
February 26th, 2008 at 11:38 amI hope this marriage brings them everything they deserve.
Comment by Zooey — February 26, 2008 @ 11:38 am
Well they’re getting each other …
February 26th, 2008 at 11:41 amThe Best Man-toy, Jeff Gannon.
February 26th, 2008 at 11:52 amSo what is her name going to be after marriage.
Monica Goodling-Criminal-Pokemon, it’s long but fitting.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:02 pmA request for immunity during their wedding vows seems to be in order.
BTW, does this mean Monica and Dana have less bubbly shopping time on weekends?
February 26th, 2008 at 12:05 pmOh, and I had the same thought now as when I read that Jenna Bush was engaged…Oh, how lovely. they are going to breed and give us more little Nazis. Isn’t that special.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:07 pmGo on Monica and Michael, run off to your gated enclave, create more illiterate, narrow-minded children the world doesn’t need, then watch soon-to-be permanent progressive majority formally render all of you irrelevant.
GFYs.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:09 pmComment by Ms_Joanne — February 26, 2008 @ 12:07 pm
More legacy admissions, more talking points, more stealing elections. It runs in the reich family.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:11 pmgag…cough….choke….cough….puke.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:12 pmComment by Gin — February 26, 2008 @ 12:12 pm
I get your point, but Reich Goodling doesn’t even deserve children –
February 26th, 2008 at 12:22 pmmarried or single. We don’t need more satanic parents corrupting youth by teaching children to think alike and only alike.
Comment by Cheap Gin — February 26, 2008 @ 12:12 pm
And once again, Cheap Gin calls the troll’s favorite third-and-long play-action pass: imagine what a progressive would mean or say, then criticize the imagined, projected response as if it were real.
Oh, too bad, the defense didn’t bite on the fake and they buried the QB for a big loss.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:26 pmNice try llama, I’m sure I must have misread the intent of that post.
Comment by Bathtub Gin — February 26, 2008 @ 12:58 pm
Can you point out where in that post Zooey suggested anything like what you implied that she suggested?
No. Zooey made a simple statement. She did not elaborate on it. You, Cheap Bathtub Gin, assumed and attributed your assumptions to her.
Then you criticized her for it.
Pretty pathetic, when you think about it.
Of course, if you don’t think about it, you can probably get away with thinking it’s fine. SOP for trolls.
February 26th, 2008 at 1:07 pmNice dodge.
On second thought, it wasn’t even a nice dodge. It was a pretty sad dodge.
February 26th, 2008 at 1:15 pmAh. A match made in heaven….or a different, much warmer place, as the case may be…
February 26th, 2008 at 1:51 pmcome 2009, those two will be lucky to get the rent paid selling diet-pills.
February 26th, 2008 at 2:29 pmShouldn’t both of them “Be Fixed?’
February 26th, 2008 at 2:33 pmDumbest. Babies. Ever.
February 26th, 2008 at 2:34 pmReich Goodling doesn’t even deserve children –
Comment by McWars — February 26, 2008 @ 12:22 pm
So a good “progressive†would decide who does or doesn’t “deserve†children? Maybe a democrat president and congress will honor us with new legislation to codify that sentiment.
Comment by Gin — February 26, 2008 @ 1:12 pm
Why not ?
Shitbags like yourself have been claiming to know what a woman can or should do with her own body and an unknown guppy that you insist are children………….
February 26th, 2008 at 2:42 pmWHOOP!! WHOOP!!
STRAWMAN ALERT AT 35!!!!
WHOOP!! WHOOP!!
February 26th, 2008 at 2:43 pmSituation in hand, Annie.
Bathtub Gin has been sent packing.
February 26th, 2008 at 2:57 pmComment by Gin — February 26, 2008 @ 12:12 pm
If that’s what YOU think they deserve….
Anyone want to join me in roasting marshmallows over the strawman fire?
February 26th, 2008 at 4:07 pmPass me a marshmallow, Zoo. I’ve got a pointed stick.
February 26th, 2008 at 4:22 pm1. Two adults have been dating for a decade — abstinence only?
February 26th, 2008 at 4:58 pm2. The thought of their parenting little clones of themselves is
a frightening prospect for future generations.
Comment by Bathtub Gin — February 26, 2008 @ 5:29 pm
Oh, it’s “misinterpreting”, is it?
Is THAT what you call it when you make sh!t up and project it onto others, then criticize them for your imaginings?
Troll linguistics fascinates me.
February 26th, 2008 at 7:50 pmWhen will we hear the pitter-patter of little green boogers?
February 27th, 2008 at 1:12 am