Comments on: FLASHBACK: In 2000, Bush Criticized McCain For Lobbying On Behalf Of Campaign Contributor http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:45:11 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: mircsevda http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-5527353 mircsevda Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:57:41 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-5527353 <a href="http://www.neomanera.com/" title="la martina" rel="nofollow">la martina</a> <a href="http://www.sevgisesi.net/" title="hi5" rel="nofollow">hi5</a> <a href="http://www.mircsevda.com/yahoo-chat/" title="yahoo sohbet" rel="nofollow">yahoo online chat</a> <a href="http://www.mircsevda.com/avrupa_chat/" title="avrupa europe sohbet" rel="nofollow">avrupa chat</a> la martina

hi5

yahoo online chat

avrupa chat

]]> By: eskiyam http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-5477456 eskiyam Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:27:19 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-5477456 <a href="http://www.iyiturk.net" title="sohbet siteleri" rel="nofollow">sohbet siteleri</a> <a href="http://www.iyiturk.net" title="netlog" rel="nofollow">netlog</a> <a href="http://www.iyiturk.net" title="turk chat" rel="nofollow">turk chat</a> <a href="http://www.Gulchat.Com" title="chat" rel="nofollow">chat</a> sohbet siteleri
netlog
turk chat
chat

]]> By: eskiyam http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-5477360 eskiyam Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:58:07 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-5477360 <a href="http://www.iyiturknet" title="sohbet siteleri" rel="nofollow">sohbet siteleri</a> <a href="http://www.iyiturk.net" title="netlog" rel="nofollow">netlog</a> <a href="http://www.iyiturk.net" title="turk chat" rel="nofollow">turk chat</a> <a href="http://www.Gulchat.Com" title="chat" rel="nofollow">chat</a> sohbet siteleri
netlog
turk chat
chat

]]> By: mircsevda http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-5443312 mircsevda Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:35:09 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-5443312 <a href="http://www.mircsevda.com" title="netlog" rel="nofollow">netlog</a> <a href="http://www.mircsevda.com/almanya_chat" title="almanya chat sohbet" rel="nofollow">almanya chat</a> netlog

almanya chat

]]> By: batteries http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-5284078 batteries Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:18:28 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-5284078 Why does the MSM feel they have to give these lying politicians a pass when the evidence is so easily uncovered? Most of all, why does the MSM always seem to give the Republicans the pass while hammering the Democrats? Maybe the MSM will wake up and finally become journalists instead of entertainment reporters or Republican party shills. I’m not naive though because over time the newspapers and TV stations have been consolidated <a href="http://www.batterylaptoppower.com/acer/squ-410.htm" rel="nofollow">acer squ-410 battery</a>,<a href="http://www.batterylaptoppower.com/acer/ferrari-4000.htm" rel="nofollow">acer ferrari 4000 battery</a> under just a few individuals/corporations. The truth is controlled now by people who believe in or benefit from the neocon ideology. Until these monopolies are broken up the truth will never come from the MSM. Why does the MSM feel they have to give these lying politicians a pass when the evidence is so easily uncovered? Most of all, why does the MSM always seem to give the Republicans the pass while hammering the Democrats?

Maybe the MSM will wake up and finally become journalists instead of entertainment reporters or Republican party shills. I’m not naive though because over time the newspapers and TV stations have been consolidated acer squ-410 battery,acer ferrari 4000 battery under just a few individuals/corporations. The truth is controlled now by people who believe in or benefit from the neocon ideology. Until these monopolies are broken up the truth will never come from the MSM.

]]> By: hellinabucket http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283990 hellinabucket Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:34:40 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283990 The G(FL)OP. The G(FL)OP.

]]> By: tarazan http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283953 tarazan Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:35:56 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283953 Talking heads on major telvision networks and newspapers are telling us how experienced McCain is in foreign policy, but when the war in Iraq issue surfaces, McCain does not want to talk about the past,when Obama raised the issue of going to Iraq in the first place, McCain said yesterday:"that was in the past". McCain does not want to face his war vote in 2002 supporting invading Iraq. McCain has no foreign policy experience..he only voted for wars in the Senate. McCain made few trips to Iraq and came back painting a rosey picture. He has been telling us for so many years that we are winning...now he is telling us that we should stay 100 years in Iraq. Is this his vision of Iraq,and at what cost? Surrounding himself with war mongers Neocons like Lieberman,Podhoritz and others , McCain wants to wage more wars in the Middle East,because he believes every foreign policy issues should be solved by starting a military conflict and muscle flexing . He will put us in more than one military conflict in short period of time if he elected. The price will be very high to pay,economically and in lives, something McCain might not look at when he pushes the button of another war. Talking heads on major telvision networks and newspapers are telling us how experienced McCain is in foreign policy, but when the war in Iraq issue surfaces, McCain does not want to talk about the past,when Obama raised the issue of going to Iraq in the first place, McCain said yesterday:”that was in the past”.
McCain does not want to face his war vote in 2002 supporting invading Iraq.
McCain has no foreign policy experience..he only voted for wars in the Senate.
McCain made few trips to Iraq and came back painting a rosey picture. He has been telling us for so many years that we are winning…now he is telling us that we should stay 100 years in Iraq.
Is this his vision of Iraq,and at what cost?

Surrounding himself with war mongers Neocons like Lieberman,Podhoritz and others , McCain wants to wage more wars in the Middle East,because he believes every foreign policy issues should be solved by starting a military conflict and muscle flexing .
He will put us in more than one military conflict in short period of time if he elected.
The price will be very high to pay,economically and in lives, something McCain might not look at when he pushes the button of another war.

]]> By: Chocolate Jesus http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283914 Chocolate Jesus Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:24:55 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283914 >Remind you of someone running for office in 2008. yes, with the minor caveat that this guy makes sense, has shown good judgement in the past, and doesnt have the shambling, quivering abortion of a track record like heir dumbya. id rather bet on a less experienced guy with good judgement than i would anyone whose made such poor decisions as supporting this groteque waltz toward armageddon the iraq war has become. >Remind you of someone running for office in 2008.

yes, with the minor caveat that this guy makes sense, has shown good judgement in the past, and doesnt have the shambling, quivering abortion of a track record like heir dumbya. id rather bet on a less experienced guy with good judgement than i would anyone whose made such poor decisions as supporting this groteque waltz toward armageddon the iraq war has become.

]]> By: OxyCon http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283867 OxyCon Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:33:26 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283867 Bush ran against "Washington insiders"; was totally naive on foreign policy; had a giant sized ego; was very inexperienced; was surrounded by millions of irrational, sycophantic worshipers; used people as props to hold new slogan signs for every event. Remind you of someone running for office in 2008? Bush ran against “Washington insiders”; was totally naive on foreign policy; had a giant sized ego; was very inexperienced; was surrounded by millions of irrational, sycophantic worshipers; used people as props to hold new slogan signs for every event.

Remind you of someone running for office in 2008?

]]> By: Pursang http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283807 Pursang Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:31:13 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283807 Why can our blogs research and come up with these examples of hypocricy and our MSM can't? Why does the MSM feel they have to give these lying politicians a pass when the evidence is so easily uncovered? Most of all, why does the MSM always seem to give the Republicans the pass while hammering the Democrats? Maybe the MSM will wake up and finally become journalists instead of entertainment reporters or Republican party shills. I'm not naive though because over time the newspapers and TV stations have been consolidated under just a few individuals/corporations. The truth is controlled now by people who believe in or benefit from the neocon ideology. Until these monopolies are broken up the truth will never come from the MSM. Why can our blogs research and come up with these examples of hypocricy and our MSM can’t? Why does the MSM feel they have to give these lying politicians a pass when the evidence is so easily uncovered? Most of all, why does the MSM always seem to give the Republicans the pass while hammering the Democrats?

Maybe the MSM will wake up and finally become journalists instead of entertainment reporters or Republican party shills. I’m not naive though because over time the newspapers and TV stations have been consolidated under just a few individuals/corporations. The truth is controlled now by people who believe in or benefit from the neocon ideology. Until these monopolies are broken up the truth will never come from the MSM.

]]> By: Doc Rock http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283782 Doc Rock Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:25:16 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283782 Left, right, and center--they're all insiders or they don't get in the door. Left, right, and center–they’re all insiders or they don’t get in the door.

]]> By: ForTruth http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283763 ForTruth Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:33:31 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283763 Its all politics. Nothing to see here. Its all politics. Nothing to see here.

]]> By: Xisithrus http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283736 Xisithrus Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:54:07 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283736 McCain was a collaborator in 2000 and now the same people call him a hero. Hypocrisy squared. McCain is a collaborator, McCain has always been a collaborator. [2000] McCain is a hero. McCain has always been a hero. [2008] McCain was a collaborator in 2000 and now the same people call him a hero.

Hypocrisy squared.

McCain is a collaborator, McCain has always been a collaborator. [2000]

McCain is a hero. McCain has always been a hero. [2008]

]]> By: singe_101 http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283710 singe_101 Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:36:20 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283710 #11 I disagree, this is anecdotal evidence and not a big sample but for GLBT folks who are voting and involved, maybe 25 I've met, Hillary is the overwhelming winner on past reputation with Bill and uncertainty on Obama (not that supporting alternative lifestyles would get him great African-American support... sorry, it's true). If he gets more votes, that further crushes Hillary and they would be more supportive and active later, not just voting D out of obligation. #11

I disagree, this is anecdotal evidence and not a big sample but for GLBT folks who are voting and involved, maybe 25 I’ve met, Hillary is the overwhelming winner on past reputation with Bill and uncertainty on Obama (not that supporting alternative lifestyles would get him great African-American support… sorry, it’s true). If he gets more votes, that further crushes Hillary and they would be more supportive and active later, not just voting D out of obligation.

]]> By: Mr. Evil http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283695 Mr. Evil Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:26:21 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283695 Only a sad-sack marshmallow would suck up to Bush after what he did to McCain in the 2000 campaign. McCain is such a whore he'd even blow the town he's in and offer Larry Craig a job. Only a sad-sack marshmallow would suck up to Bush after what he did to McCain in the 2000 campaign. McCain is such a whore he’d even blow the town he’s in and offer Larry Craig a job.

]]> By: Buckie Boy http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283683 Buckie Boy Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:17:18 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283683 Where's McInsane's other hand? Groping GW's butt maybe? GW looks like he is enjoying it. If he puts it a little further up there he might find GiGi's head. Where’s McInsane’s other hand?

Groping GW’s butt maybe?

GW looks like he is enjoying it.

If he puts it a little further up there he might find GiGi’s head.

]]> By: Jackie http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283671 Jackie Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:04:04 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283671 First things first McCain has to get Bush to change the words in the US Constitution. Only a Natural born US Citizen can be a US President. Now all the talk about Hillary/Obama History making well McCain has one better. As McCain wasn't born on US soil he will be the first President not a natural born citizen. Look for Putin to take the citizenship test and run for President under the new rules. California Governor Arnie could get the spot but first he has to learn how to speak English but then again Bush doesn't speak English and his Father paid for his College Degree so who knows. First things first McCain has to get Bush to change the words in the US Constitution. Only a Natural born US Citizen can be a US President. Now all the talk about Hillary/Obama History making well McCain has one better. As McCain wasn’t born on US soil he will be the first President not a natural born citizen. Look for Putin to take the citizenship test and run for President under the new rules. California Governor Arnie could get the spot but first he has to learn how to speak English but then again Bush doesn’t speak English and his Father paid for his College Degree so who knows.

]]> By: Little Freep Goofballs http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283662 Little Freep Goofballs Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:53:12 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283662 McCain gets endorsement from America's favorite vote suppressor- <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV5a7eNvstU" rel="nofollow">Ken Blackwell</a> McCain gets endorsement from America’s favorite vote suppressor-

Ken Blackwell

]]> By: RUCerious http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283647 RUCerious Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:33:24 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283647 McCain's Open letter to gays would be a scarlet H. McCain’s Open letter to gays would be a scarlet H.

]]> By: Marie http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-4283645 Marie Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:30:54 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/bush-mccain-2000/#comment-4283645 OT, but an important issue for equality: Obama pens an open letter to the gay community. Americablog.com has two excerpts, and links. Don't hold your breath for McCain or any republican to do the same. OT, but an important issue for equality:
Obama pens an open letter to the gay community.

Americablog.com has two excerpts, and links.

Don’t hold your breath for McCain or any republican to do the same.

]]>