Comment by raymundohpl — March 4, 2008 @ 3:11 pm

R.I.P. = ROT IN PRISON!!

Did you ever wonder why after each victory of John McCain in the primaries the media serves the same images of a few dozen people “cheering”?
The answer: McCain is supported by as many people as George W. Bush, i.e. 1 pct of the population. He did not manage to ever break the 1,000 barrier for an audience, including the large share of paid campaign personnel.

Why did the illuminati stage the 2008 US elections as John McCain losing to Hillary Clinton, supported by less than 5 pct of the population, after staging the “close as it can get” victory of Clinton against the “hope of change for America”, supported by 80 pct of the “voters”, “black” “ex-muslim” Obama (1)?

Why did the illuminati openly tell the sheep in 2006 some of the truth about 9/11, e.g. that the WTC towers were demolished? (2)

See Notes and Answer here:
http://end-times-data.blogspot.com/2008/02/loser-john-mccain-to-clinton-horrible.html

Comment by bilbobaggins — March 4, 2008 @ 6:09 pm

He’s sort of morphed into a hybrid. I’ve noticed a concerted effort on his part to actually discuss stuff sometimes, instead of just always dropping troll turds in the walkway like he used to do. He doesn’t always make sense, but he seems to be trying. Sometimes.

Southern Man isn’t a troll? When did that happen? When did he morph from a troll to not a troll?

That’s exactly the kind of Rovian tactic that I so despise. I am so disappointed in the campaign she has run that I am angry with her. I hope and pray she is not the nominee.
When she is in a tight spot, she fights dirty.

I’ll be there tonight to speak up, when necessary.

Comment by katy — March 4, 2008 @ 4:44 pm

Not necessarily. I think there’s a real benefit to a good fight for the nomination. One, it keeps the candidates in the forefront of the news. Two, the winning candidate may be made stronger for the general election. It certainly drives fundraising more vigorously and for a longer period of time. Plus I don’t think the wounds inflicted in the primaries are generally that deep and they heal quickly once the general campaign begins.

“one of Clinton’s laws of politics… you better vote
for the person who wants you to think and HOPE”

YAY!!!!!

http://samsedershow.com/node/2554

Yes, primary, not general.

Now excuse me. I gotta go check to see if my roast crow is done yet.

(Damn trolls, makes me mad so I lash out at people I shouldn’t)

OMG, that is so Republican. If you can’t win honestly, cheat. God I hope she gets her ass kicked today. She deserves it.

Comment by Perry logan — March 4, 2008 @ 1:17 pm

Really? I like it. Alot. :-)

Rush Limbaugh is urging his listeners in Texas to vote for Hillary Clinton saying it helps the Republicans if the Democratic race remains unsettled for weeks to come.

(link doesn’t work – but you can find one… you know it’s true)

as randi opines, limpballs expects hillary to do the dirty work of
sliming obama for the repugs…

sounds logical to me…

Clinton’s Texas strategy: Take control of caucus sign-in sheets and vote tallies especially “if our supporters are outnumbered.”
.

Hillary Clinton and her campaign is pushing for precinct captains for Texas’ 8,000 Democratic polling places. They need to train folks to lead the caucus sessions that will determine more than 60 delegates after the primary voting is over.
In training materials being handed out by the Clinton campaign, it is clear that they want to control those caucus sessions.
The materials say in part, “DO NOT allow the supporter of another candidate to serve in leadership roles.
[...]
http://trailblazers.beloblog.com/archives/2008/03/caucus-strategy.html

Comment by Southern Man — March 4, 2008 @ 4:26 pm

Some people have proposed an open primary ballot with the top two vote getters going on to the general election, regardless of party affiliation. I’m not sure it would work, but I have to admit it’s fascinating. Party officials, obviously, hate the idea.

Comment by Southern Man — March 4, 2008 @ 3:51 pm

It’s a primary ballot, not a general election ballot. People are voting to determine who will represent that party in the general election. So, yes, everyone on the ballot is from the same party.

For instance, I am an independent. Though I support Obama for President (and wouldn’t vote McCain as dog-catcher), my support for Obama in the primaries is limited to a sign in my window, because I do not identify myself as Democrat. Also, since I’m not Republican either, I couldn’t spoil the election and vote for Ron Paul, the ONLY Republican candidate I would think about voting Dog-catcher…

I have a similar friend and situation. She already voted for Obama as well as her life-long Republican voting parents.