Think Progress

FBI director confirms privacy violations.

In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today, FBI Director Robert Mueller confirmed that his agency “improperly used national security letters in 2006 to obtain personal data on Americans during terror and spy investigations.” More details will be outlined in the coming days in a new Justice Department Inspector General report.



46 Responses to “FBI director confirms privacy violations.”

  1. Nevar says:

    I’m sure AG Mukasey will be jumping right on this one….


  2. davemartin7777 says:

    Damning indeed.

    Score one for our side.


  3. Fritz says:

    In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today, FBI Director Robert Mueller confirmed that his agency “improperly used national security letters in 2006 to obtain personal data on Americans during terror and spy investigations.

    This is not news…Of COURSE they did.


  4. jpoke42 says:

    hey dems, I think its time for another strongly worded letter…


  5. po says:

    Having admitted to violating one law, he then went on to demand that Congress rubberstamp and backdate previous lawbreaking by the Unitary Executive. The Democratic leadership will craft the necessary bills later this evening over a meal of shredded Constitution with a demiglaze of Independence.


  6. davemartin7777 says:

    Fox News:

    FBI director confirms 2006 spying on terrorists.


  7. tom says:

    Now I understand why GDumbya was tap-dancing at the north portico while waiting for McSame today . . . he’s practicing!


  8. Uncle Ho says:

    How long before the trolls come on to say no one’s rights were violated?


  9. DieNowForPeace says:

    Nope. No abuses here. Nothing to see folks, move along:

    “Everybody wants to stop terrorists. But we also, though, as Americans, we believe in our privacy rights and we want those protected,” Leahy said. “There has to be a better chain of command for this. You cannot just have an FBI agent who decides he’d like to obtain Americans’ records, bank records or anything else and do it just because they want to.”

    National security letters, as outlined in the USA Patriot Act, are administrative subpoenas used in suspected terrorism and espionage cases. They allow the FBI to require telephone companies, Internet service providers, banks, credit bureaus and other businesses to produce highly personal records about their customers or subscribers without a judge’s approval.

    Former FBI agent Michael German, now a national security adviser for the American Civil Liberties Union, said Mueller’s admission that the bureau violated laws for the fourth year in a row underscores the need to have a judge sign off on the subpoenas.

    “The credibility factor shows there needs to be outside oversight,” German said after the hearin


  10. bilbobaggins says:

    I believe that we already knew this. And it will now, have as much affect as it did the last time we were told this. That would be nothing.

    I certainly hope that President Obama investigates each and every one of these violations of our privacy when after he takes office.

    No, you may not have my rights. I’m still using them!


  11. Zooey says:

    Uh oh, someone is going to receive a stern letter about this.


  12. DieNowForPeace says:

    p.s. the FBI are a bunch of clowns. National Men in Blue, nothing more, and more often, a lot less.


  13. Mr. Evil says:

    Hey Zooey, just in case you missed my reply on the McSame thread, you should see this to help prove your point. http://blog.wired.com/ 27bstroke6/ 2008/ 03/ did-the-clinton.html



  14. bilbobaggins says:

    Mueller, noting senators’ concerns about Americans’ civil and privacy rights, said the new report “will identify issues similar to those in the report issued last March.” The similarities, he said, are because the time period of the two studies “predates the reforms we now have in place.”
    He added: “We are committed to ensuring that we not only get this right, but maintain the vital trust of the American people.”

    Sorry Mueller, you lost the trust of the American people a long time ago and are not going to regain it. It will take a new director under a Democratic administration to regain this kind of trust.


  15. robbez_92107 says:

    Sounds like a great reason to give the telecoms immunity, doesn’t it?


  16. IgnoranceIsNotBliss says:

    Tell me something didn’t know.


  17. Zooey says:

    Comment by Mr. Evil — March 5, 2008 @ 1:25 pm

    We did a post on that at TheZoo yesterday. :-)

    Thanks, Mr Evil!


  18. ForTruth says:

    Those National Security Letters are bullshit! I can’t say if I got one.


  19. ForTruth says:

    Zooey wassup with you? Having fun?


  20. Zooey says:

    Hey ForTruth, it’s almost Spring Break — definitely having fun. :)

    You?


  21. Max-1 says:

    .

    This write itself:

    Incompetence is as incompetence does.

    .

    So,
    What is the deterrent to such violations?
    What is in place to act as consequential response?

    Congress…
    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…

    .


  22. tombaker says:

    Let’s get the tapdancer and his puppetmaster in irons then – right now.


  23. Buckie Boy says:

    And were they really spys or terrorists? Or were they Democrats running for office, reporters who just might actually report, Journalists who might actually not spew WH talking points, Protesters?

    That is the problem with this sort of activity, they can say one thing and do something just the opposite.

    Bush would say, “It’s secret.”

    Bush/Cheney
    Hague Trials ‘09


  24. Bluestocking says:

    I think it’s safe to say that those of us who have been voicing concerns over the past couple of years about the potential for the federal government to misuse and abuse the powers it has granted itself have now had those concerns at the very least partially vindicated. How much clearer does it really need to be that this administration cannot and should not be trusted?


  25. WiretapThis says:

    Gosh, I am so, so, very surprised that our government would violate privacy laws, abuse power, and ignore the 4th Amendment. I just can’t believe that they would do this!

    /sarcasm

    Impeach. Now.


  26. DieNowForPeace says:

    You can bet that anyone who posts here is in the NSA database.

    Do we need to post the U.S. Constitution here, just to make sure they’ve read it?


  27. Max-1 says:

    .

    See,
    The Patiot Act works…

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    .


  28. Marcus Aurelius says:

    Improperly or illegally?


  29. Uncle Ho says:

    DNFP; hint, hint

    those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable- John F. Kennedy


  30. DieNowForPeace says:

    Comment by Uncle Ho — March 5, 2008 @ 2:01 pm

    Excuse you?

    The moniker, if you will, is a jab at the complete oxymoron of the phrase, “without war, there can be no peace.”

    It’s usually the most confusing, as was intended, to the Neoturdocons.


  31. DieNowForPeace says:

    …as in “once we kill ya, we’ll have some peace!”


  32. Uncle Ho says:

    DNFP; Whoa! Did not intend to offend you. The JFK quote is meant for the NSA spooks listening in. What I meant was that I concur that we are being watched.


  33. 2MillionLightYearsToAndromeda says:

    This is not news…Of COURSE they did.

    Comment by Fritz — March 5, 2008 @ 1:17 pm

    You won’t hear Brian and Katy mention it on their evening entertainment/propaganda shows today. So it must not be news.


  34. DieNowForPeace says:

    Uncle,

    Sorry, did not intend to sound offended.

    I’m a little “tap happy” (keyboard wise) myself today, after last nights local caucus.


  35. jb says:

    FBI finally confirms what the whole f-ing world has known all along.


  36. DieNowForPeace says:

    INDICT.
    IMPEACH.
    IMPRISON.

    enjoy!


  37. Uncle Ho says:

  38. Uncle Ho says:

    DNFP; it don’t mean nothing. :-)


  39. DieNowForPeace says:

  40. Dave von Ebers says:

    Kinda makes me miss the good ol’ days, when Republicans used to mock us with sarcastic comments like “I’m from the government … I’m here to help.” Now they expect us to buy that crap.

    The difference, of course, is that we liberals believed not only in the use of government for the good of the people, but we respected Constitution’s limits as well.

    Bad things happen when you jettison the Bill of Rights, fellas.


  41. stateofthedivision says:

    How does one find out if they were on the list?


  42. ForTruth says:

    Hey Zooey,

    Yup I’m havin’ more fun than a pig in shit.


  43. Zooey says:

    Yup I’m havin’ more fun than a pig in shit.
    Comment by ForTruth — March 5, 2008 @ 3:07 pm

    That’s a hell of a lot of fun, Truth. :)

    I’ll be in touch soon.


  44. WaltTheMan says:

    How does one find out if they were on the list?

    Comment by stateofthedivision — March 5, 2008 @ 3:05 pm

    Two indicators – this site will go down and you will hear a knock on your front door on the first Wednesday next November.


  45. RUCerious says:

    I’m sure someone will receive a stern letter.

    **crickets chirping softly**



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll