He certainly help make it easy on Coulter. This is some of her best work.

.
.
.
Spitzer can’t go to the restaurants he used to frequent. He can’t go to the Whitney Museum near his apartment. He can’t go to track meets at his daughters’ expensive private school. He can’t show his face in public.
.
.
.
The golden boy’s disgrace is deep and subliminal; it can’t be expunged.
.
.
.
It’s absurd to talk about legal defenses. This guy has fallen from the pinnacle of New York society to being a disgrace to his class. He’s the Ivy League version of Paris Hilton.

That was always the advantage Clinton had: We never expected any better. He went from Skunk Trot, Ark., to Skunk Trot, Ark. Spitzer fell from Fifth Avenue to Skunk Trot, Ark.

Ann Coulter’s “Whoreable behavior” at

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/coulter031308.php3

Cal Thomas also gets in some easy licks with “Sex and the Marriage Governor” at

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/coulter031308.php3

Thomas quotes some applicable scripture.

So when you start doing that — learning?

If you’ve already started, what have you learned here?

No one’s buying it, stone pile. Might as well pack it in, change your handle again.

‘Course, your act is so obvious that it won’t take us long to spot you then, either.

Idiot.

How do these politicians get away with it? If any of us were caught going to prostitutes, there would be no question that we would get arrested.

Not Spitzer. Not Vitter. The only reason Larry Craig got arrested is because they didn’t know he was a Senator.

Still waiting for the proof of your allegations, loser.

What are you – a third grader? Annie said “blow job”!! Annie said “blow job”! Neener, neener, neener!!

Idiot.

So, does the “Vitter” name give similar type protection to Sen. Vitter?

Not that he raped anyone, but the man did confess that he visited prostitutes. Why does Gov. Spitzer have to resign with Republicans calling for his impeachment, while Sen. Vitter gets a free pass?

Comment by ralph the wonder llama — March 12, 2008 @ 3:14 pm

Real arguments are okay, ralph. We just SOOOOO rarely get ‘em here.

And I have to admit… I just like snarkin’ around here, at times.

Comment by ralph the wonder llama — March 12, 2008 @ 2:54 pm

I’d be lyin’ if I said I didn’t like playin’ Whack-a-Trollâ„¢, ralph. I don’t like a lot of what SM says, but I don’t flag him the way I flagged Bert Convey or cairgnman. Trolling is a strange phenomenon as far as I can tell and I’m not quite sure what it’s about.

I usually only flag someone, like the above mentioned twits, when I’m sure they’re ONLY here to flat out screw w/ folks heads. Some trolls, like SM, keltoi, Ex-lax, & g_g, can be annoyingas hell, but they don’t flat out drive me up the wall the way Bert did.

I was here during Mr P’s meth rampages and that one was destroying the place. Free speech is a strange thing.

in the world of law where you work as a copy boy maybe.

Well, wasn’t the Pres. Clinton the “tat” for the Pres. Nixon “tit”?

I always thought the main reason the Republicans hounded Pres. Clinton for as long as they did was because he was so popular and they wanted to “get the Dems back’ for Pres. Nixon resigning when he was caught breaking the law.

When it’s handy to be southern, he’s from nola,

and when it’s inconvenient to be southern, he’s from “South Jersey”

otherwise, not somebody I’d put in the same basket with gg et al.

Maybe it’s just because I wish there were more conservatives here who would stand up for their beliefs and make solid arguments for them, instead of Clinton Did Itâ„¢ all the time.

Okay, it probably won’t be a popular opinion at the moment, but I don’t count SM as a real troll anymore.
Just my opinion.

Comment by ralph the wonder llama

I thought so too Ralph…..my obersvation was directed mostly at SM who has said he doesn’t consider himself to be a troll. My judgment was based only on his perfomance in this thread today…….time will tell.

Waiting while the crickets chirp. See in the world of the law where I work, you actually have to prove your allegations, not pull them out of your arse. Furthermore, spare me your moral fiber bs. In your simplistic world, I suppose people lack moral fiber because we disagree with you. Well thank you very much, that I disagree with your simpleton views, means that I have substance and not participating in an echo chamber. Enjoy your simplistic little conclusions, loser.

T U-nit !!

After all, it’s not a lie, or a crime, if it’s committed in service of the Cheerleader’s Glorious GWoT.