Think Progress

White House: Confusion Over Long-Term Agreement With Iraq Resulted From A Sloppy Arabic Translation»

bushmaliki3.jpg In November, President Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki signed a non-bindingDeclaration of Principles for a Long-Term Relationship” that committed America to defending Iraq:

Supporting the Republic of Iraq in defending its democratic system against internal and external threats. […]

Providing security assurances and commitments to the Republic of Iraq to deter foreign aggression against Iraq that violates its sovereignty and integrity of its territories, waters, or airspace.

At the time, the White House said that the unprecedented arrangement would not need “input” from Congress.

After facing intense criticism from lawmakers, the White House backed off, recently stating that arrangement is “not going to have a security guarantee.” Officials are now trying to come up with excuses to explain away their initial bumbling as well. Their latest? The long-term agreement was incorrectly translated from Arabic to English. Politico reports:

But the senior administration official, who briefed two Politico reporters on the condition that he not be identified by name, said that the “security assurances” phrase “was something we struggled with, it really was.” He said the original Arabic phrase was “translated in kind of an interesting way,” and that a better translation might have been, “We’ll consult.”

This excuse seems unlikely. First, White House officials have never before mentioned it. Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) said that the administration “certainly did not speak to this unfortunate translation from Arabic” when it briefed senators on the planned agreement recently. Rep. Bill Delahunt (D-MA) also said that he hadn’t heard the argument.

Second, Assistant Secretary of State Jeffrey Bergner recently stated that Bush does have “constitutional authority” to “continue combat operations” in Iraq without Congress’s authorization. As evidence, he cited the 2002 authorization of force against Saddam Hussein and the resolution passed after 9/11. Clearly, Bergner never thought there was an Arabic mistranslation.

Both Webb and Delahunt also have their doubts about the administration’s newest excuse:

Delahunt said he suspected that the administration, having been “outed, if you will” by congressional oversight, has decided that it’s the “safe course” to argue that the words aren’t what they appear to be. Webb’s spokeswoman, Jessica Smith, wondered why the White House didn’t “retranslate” the offending language before releasing the Declaration of Principles.

This distrust is understandable; in January, Bush attached a signing statement to a defense authorization bill saying that he would disregard a provision that “bars funding for permanent bases in Iraq.”

The truth is that White House officials tried to undermine Congress on Iraq and were forced to muster a weak excuse when they were caught.

43







Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

39 Responses to “White House: Confusion Over Long-Term Agreement With Iraq Resulted From A Sloppy Arabic Translation”


  1. hussein toasterhead Says:

    I wonder if the original Arabic text is available somewhere. I’d love to debunk this one…


  2. shoeless Says:

    Wow, I didn’t know that the Constitution was written in Arabic. Here is an accurate translation. Would someone please send this to the White House, so there is no more “confusion”.

    The United States Constitution

    Article. II. - The Executive Branch

    Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments

    He [The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;


  3. flavorino Says:

    Let’s not wait until next January for these idiots to leave.
    It’s time to fire these clowns, NOW.
    We should start by impeaching (which means starting the investigative process)Dickhead Cheney.


  4. belac Says:

    It would seem to me that when you are working on International treaties you would want to be sure that the translations are correct before you sign anything… of course, I probably have more than one auditor who spoke Arabic working on the books as well…


  5. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    I don’t know if it was part of the plan or, they just made lemonade, but this administration has stumbled on a gold mine of excuses. They can blame almost anything on Incompetence. Standy idly by while an American city is destroyed… “faulty intelligence” leads exactly where the neocons wanted to go all along (Iraq)… 12 billion in cash “goes missing” in Baghdad…is there ANYTHING they can’t lay off on the fact that Republicans are terrible at governing???


  6. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    What… no “Clinton Did it”™?

    Wait… wait… the dog at the translator’s homework!

    Hmmm… mebbe it was one of those “gay” translators ‘n he, or she, was out ta undermine tha President…


  7. flavorino Says:

    Providing security assurances and commitments to the Republic of Iraq to deter foreign aggression against Iraq that violates its sovereignty and integrity of its territories, waters, or airspace.

    So it’s not ok for any else to commit acts of aggression and violate the integrity of it’s territories……
    but it’s ok when we did it.


  8. belac Says:

    Seems like the White House was pretty clear last November about what it meant…


  9. Leporello Says:

    What’s really depressing is that this Administration is such an amazing collection of inept buffoons that I’m tempted to take their explanation at face value. New lows reached, once again. When, oh when, will Congress remember that Oversight is one of their duties?
    Impeach Cheney and Bush and Save the Constitution!

    Abu Ben Hussein Leporello


  10. RUCerious Says:

    OK, OK, so the chymp thought a treaty was something he made Barney do trickeys for.


  11. tombaker Says:

    test


  12. shoeless Says:

    flavorino Says:

    So it’s not ok for any else to commit acts of aggression and violate the integrity of it’s territories……
    but it’s ok when we did it.

    Well, yeah. I mean, just because a guy beats his wife doesn’t mean he is going to let other guys beat her.


  13. tombaker Says:

    ha! - like they ever cared what, or didn’t dictate exactly what it says. what a sorry bunch of excuse-makers.


  14. JMOHR Says:

    When will we see the big headlines on all of the MSM decrying the fact that the administration once again resorts to revisionist history and lies to cover its own miserable record? Will we see the Democratic party response to the President’s saturday radio address calling him on this lie and questioning why we should believe him on any topic?


  15. WaltinTexas Says:

    Total incompetence- a Bush/Cheney administration trademark.


  16. belac Says:

    Wolfie was pushing for a permanent presence in 1998


  17. Fan of Man Says:

    BULLSHlT!!! THE HEAT IS ON MOFO’S!



  18. Tobie Tall Says:

    1/ Doubts linger in Big Oil’s mind over signing time for new deals

    Iraq is unlikely to sign technical support contracts with oil majors for work on some of its biggest oilfields until the summer

    Technical support contracts are shite they last two years and get paid in Oil ……… meanwhile China get a real contract

    ITS OVER 82% of Iraqis want the US out

    America is using Turkey to justify long term contracts to stay to Protect Iraq from turkey


  19. Tobie Tall Says:

    Iraq has cut the official selling price of its Basra Light crude for April loading by $2.20 a barrel to European buyers and raised prices for the United States

    its all here

    http://iraqoilreport.com/


  20. Tobie Tall Says:

    It is international law which states that the occupying forces have no right to impose laws which reflect their interests only, and do not reflect the interests of the occupied people and that such laws are null and void if any future elected Iraqi parliament declares them to be so.

    Iraq just has to sit its time


  21. Tobie Tall Says:

    More people now think Britain invaded Iraq to gain control of the country’s oil than for any other reason, a new poll reveals today.

    http://www.bushagenda.net/article.php?id=478


  22. Tobie Tall Says:

    Iraqi oil should be used to rebuild Iraq, not to swell the profits of oil multinationals.

    Fifth anniversary of the Iraq war
    Saturday, 15 March 2008 – global demonstrations, including London and Glasgow


  23. Marie Says:

    Eddie Haskell is in the Oval Office. The Bushies have been lying to us from the first day when they claimed all the typewriter keys were missing the “W” key. That was a school-boy lie — they progressed to international lies and subterfuge.
    The obvious exposure of the latest lie by the gang that can’t tell the truth, causes them to tell even another lie to cover it up. They were caught with their pants down and they are scrambling to recover. They simply cannot tell the truth — ever. They lied, they were caught, they lied again.


  24. help.me.jebus Says:

    I speak good enough Arabic to tell you, that even the worst translator wouldn’t translate “security assurances” to “we’ll consult”.

    Sorry but this is Bullsh*t


  25. belac Says:

    You Dem’s couldn’t run a ferrous wheel?
    Is this some new type of iron amusement/torture that you republicans are inflicting on each other?


  26. belac Says:

    Tell me oh, stone-pile on the wall…
    Who is the Ferrous Maiden of them all?
    Iron Maiden?!? Sweet!!!


  27. belac Says:

    I’ll make you a deal, al Stone-pile…
    We’ll let you guys run the Ferris Wheels and all other amusement park rides and you guys stop running the country into the ground and leave governing to grown-ups… Deal?


  28. John Kerry Says:

    JEREMIAH WRIGHT??????


  29. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    “You Dem’s couldn’t run a ferrous wheel…”
    __________

    Ah yeas… the sad, sad results of home schooling…


  30. belac Says:

    Stone-pile…
    Can you and your two friends tell me why the President’s office can’t translate documents into English?
    Based on your posts, I know you couldn’t but considering there are at least two people on this thread who could- why do you think this administration can’t? Is their learning somehow impeded by their education?
    Or perhaps you can offer a compelling reason that the president must lie about our permanent presence in Iraq… I’ll let you three chew that over before assigning you your Carnival duties…


  31. Tstatguy Says:

    Yeah, we all got a kick “outta” that. You’re too funny. Not much of a speller, though.


  32. Buckie Boy Says:

    Thecairngman Spews:
    You Dem’s couldn’t run a ferrous wheel. Your no different than Obama or the KKK. All you need is a common enemy to hate so your little pathetic lives can be justified.

    Ok, tard let’s take a look at your ignorance of the english language again today, shall we.

    Ferris not ferrous, You’re not your. Hell even you spelled your name wrong, idiot.
    Thecaringman not Thecairngman.

    You really don’t need to post here and embarrass yourself all day long. When you can’t do better than a 3rd grader then you won’t be taken seriously on anything you post, idiot.


  33. Merlin Says:

    BushCo does whatever its corporate handlers want it to do. There is no other reason. Now if what they do does not get by scrutiny, be it illegal, immoral or fattening, the program is to exaggerate, lie, evade, avoid, and hide through secrecy. They expect that the public will raise a stink, which they will ignore, manning their guns that all is OK.

    We, blame them for being inept, stupid, incompetent, etc. when in fact those judgments are totally off base. They LIKE it when we do that! It diverts us from the reality that everything that they do is done on purpose, for selfish reasons, and the country be damned!

    We need to loudly proclaim that they are NOT stupid or inept! We (the Congress) need to grow the balls to confront this crap EVERY TIME they do it, and press them like prosecutors seeking a conviction! We the people, need to grow the balls to vote out these weak and compliant Dems (think Blue Dog) so we can stop these criminals from dragging our country into the mud.

    First things First!… Impeach Cheney!


  34. had enough Says:

    Wasn’t there a group of military personnel kicked out of the military for being gay that could translate Arabic? My now disbelieving and questioning mind says the Bush crime family got rid of them because they could translate Arabic.


  35. Max-1 Says:

    I guess they need to fire that lone translator then.

    .


  36. Evil Spaniard Says:

    “White House: Confusion Over Long-Term Agreement With Iraq Resulted From A Sloppy Arabic Translation”

    See kids? This is what happens when you don’t have translators hired, because you’re too idiot to compagine the concepts “fluent in arab language” and “faithful american” in your little Presidunce mind, resulting in idiotic policies.


  37. woodguy Says:

    Thecairngman Says:
    March 14th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
    Sounds great!! I have no party affiliation so me and my 2 friends will be glad accommodate!

    “Me…will”? “Will be glad accomodate”? Come back when you learn basic grammar. Oh, and hurry please, I’m over fifty, so time is short.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
image
View Most Popular
image
image
Visit Our Affiliated Site
image
image image
What We're About
image
image
Featured
image
image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



image
image
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



image
Reports
image
image
imageTopic Cloud
image

image
imageArchives
image

image
imageBlog Roll
image

imageAbout Think ProgressimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage