abu grahb?
what about:
- 4000 U.S. troops dead
- many times more innocent Iraqi civilians killed
- a million or 2 displaced Iraqis
- hundreds of billions of taxpayers dollars wasted

yup! i’d say that’s FAR worse than anything saddam did!

btw, are you be willing to give your life or the life of a loved one to continue the occupation?

~LividHusseinLib

p.s. i wasn’t worried about iraq. not at all and i’m not worried about iran either!

Well I suppose maybe that is possible. God knows we have heard enough different explainations from those who started it so far.

1 in 10 have lost an arm or a leg

1 in 5 displaced are the lucky ones

There was nothing to be worried about in Iraq. They were doing just fine. What happend at Abu Ghrab was far worse than anything Sadam had done, right?

Yes. Yes, it was. Abu Ghraib was far worse than anything Saddam had done.

The Iraqi people knew where they stood with Saddam. Yeah, he was a nasty dictator, but if you kept your mouth shut and your nose clean in the old Iraq you could stay out of those horrible prisons and torture chambers.

In the new Iraq, we rolled in with promises of regime change and freedom and democracy and liberation. The United States – land of the free – was going to come in and rescue Iraq from this cruel dictator.

And then what did we do? We shot innocent Iraqis on the street in cold blood. We raided their houses and took away their family members. We tortured Iraqi prisoners. We beat Iraqi prisoners to death. We humiliated them and threatened their families and detained them indefinitely, often without any cause whatsoever. Just because some Iraqi wanted to settle a grudge or collect reward money and fingered a guy from a rival tribe or family as an “insurgent.”

All the while, still promising freedom and democracy to the people of Iraq. We replaced a cruel dictator with a cruel farce of democracy.

Yeah, I think that’s far worse.

The US has a habit of seeing enemies of our enemies as friends, in the middle east. These relationships never last, and end up in a bitter break up. That’s what happened with Saddam. We still play this game to this day.

So this war was started because the American Govt just love’s to kill people.

Yup. And it’s proven this time and time again since 1953. If there’s a profit motive involved, it doesn’t matter how many foreign people have to die.

give it up!

We got us one of them “couldn’t find their a$$hole with a map and a flashlight” types here.

Absolutely. There’s no way this one make the full 10 cents per post.

The Bush lickspittle cultists moan about “moral relativism”, all the while defending Bush by saying that he isn’t as bad as Saddam. “Just a little better than Saddam is good enough for me!” Talk about lowering the bar.

Verbal, the GOOP has made an art form of “lowering the bar” these last seven years. It must be said to have been a sound strategy to enhance their electoral prospects. In fact, it may have been the only strategy open to them.

The American Government wants what it wants and if it doesn’t get what it wants, then it has no problem killing people to get what it wants.

This latest troll has proven far less interesting than even Rotgut Gin. I’d go so far as to say that this once-a-stone-pile troll is the most boring we’ve ever seen here at TP.

To look up things like “insurgent”, “guerilla war” and “freedom fighters”.

Translation: “Four million displaced, one million dead, chaos in the streets, that’s just fine with me!”

Pathetic, disgusting, grasping sicko.

We got us one of them “couldn’t find their a$$hole with a map and a flashlight” types here.