Think Progress

Kagan claims Democrats want to ‘profit on this war.’

During Gen. David Petraeus and Amb. Ryan Crocker’s testimony last week, lawmakers from both parties pointed out that U.S. taxpayers “are carrying a staggering burden” to pay for reconstruction in Iraq at the same time Iraq “rakes in massive amounts of oil revenues.” On his radio show last night, Hugh Hewitt asked surge architect Fred Kagan for his “assessment of that critique.” Kagan responded by wildly misinterpreting it, saying that critcs want “to make a profit on this war“:

KAGAN: Well, golly gee, I mean, you know, I thought it was no blood for oil, right? I mean, do we actually have an imperialistic party in this country? And is it actually the Democratic Party? I didn’t think that we’d gone into Iraq to make a profit on this war.

Listen here:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/04/KaganIraqProfits.320.40.flv]

Over at Attackerman, Spencer Ackerman mocks Kagan’s “energetic non-sequitur” and points out that it’s war hawks who have actually profiteered from the war.



44 Responses to “Kagan claims Democrats want to ‘profit on this war.’”

  1. Nevar says:

    Huh.. I didn’t know Halliburton, KBR, and all the other security contractors had ties to the Democratic Party… must be some of Hillary’s friends, huh?
    …and “golly gee”?
    Is Kagan hanging out with Rumpsfelt?


  2. BushHater says:

    I think we ought to make a buck or two. Halliburton, Blackwater and the rest of the war business have.

    Bushco – spreading freedom, democracy and makin’ money!


  3. RUCerious says:

    I didn’t know KBR and Halliburton were Democratic strongholds?


  4. RUCerious says:

    Nevar, sorry for the toes…


  5. williamf says:

    This man is not serious is he? Look at the facts that’s all. When this whole thing started it was a Republican majority that put it in motion and it’s contracts by the billions for the likes of Halliburping and Sewerwater or whatever. This is laughable. Fiction once again from the pie holes for fascism.


  6. gummitch says:

    Interesting interpretation. Apparently, the desire not to drive the country into penury equates to war profiteering. Someone light a match, because this gasbag needs to be ignited.


  7. SP Biloxi says:

    “Kagan claims Democrats want to ‘profit on this war.’”

    That’s a joke. Did he check Dick Cheney’s mattress and portfolio and the rest of the GOPs’ wallet, piggy bank, and assets?


  8. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    This is too dumb to even reply to. The Republicans are becoming increasingly desperate and are grasping at straws. They haven’t learned yet that a piece of straw is pretty hard to hang on by.


  9. Sachem says:

    Golly Gee…unadulterated horseshit.


  10. Sachem says:

    Has anyone seen my muzzle?


  11. barfly says:

    Is Kagan hanging out with Rumpsfelt?

    Too graphic! Now, I need a stiff drink to erase that mental image.


  12. Zooey says:

    Thanks for not running a picture of Kagan.

    **shudder**


  13. Chocolate Jesus says:

    Sounds familiar.. like the trolls here trying to explain to us how Al Gore is just making things about global warming up to sell books, but somehow Exxon mobil is bringing us the unbiased truth out of the goodness of thier heart. Nevermind that, legally speaking, corporations are unable to have hearts.


  14. Anacher Forester says:

    The nerve of that fat little PNAC prick.

    -AF
    Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud


  15. Merlin says:

    I didn’t think that we’d gone into Iraq to make a profit on this war.

    This must be “opposite day.”


  16. ucsbclassics53 says:

    Nothing projects like a Neo-con or a Republican…


  17. Frank White says:

    Kagan is right in a way. If it wasn’t for Iraq, the Progressive movement would still be marginalized. In a way we owe Bush for the fact we are on the Cusp of a historic victory that will lead to a Progressive America. The Iraq war has been a blessing in disguised.


  18. nofltwlt says:

    Please, someone sodomize this guy with the fat end of a baseball bat! Preferably it will be a soldier back from Iraq.


  19. Merlin says:

    From Wiki:

    Kagan authored the “real Iraq Study Group” report as the AEI’s hawkish rival to the ISG report of James Baker and Lee H. Hamilton in December 2006. The AEI report, titled Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq, was released on January 5, 2007, and Kagan was said to have won-over the ear of President George W. Bush,[3] strongly influencing his subsequent “surge” plan for changing the course of the Iraq War. Along with retired Gen. Jack Keane, retired Col Joel Armstrong, and retired Maj Daniel Dwyer, Kagan is credited as one of the “intellectual architects” of the surge plan.[4]

    And he snarkily says this…

    “KAGAN: Well, golly gee, I mean, you know, I thought it was no blood for oil, right? I mean, do we actually have an imperialistic party in this country? And is it actually the Democratic Party? I didn’t think that we’d gone into Iraq to make a profit on this war.”

    Wouldn’t you like to have a beer with this hometown sort of guy? I mean golly gee…


  20. Merlin says:

    Frank White Says:
    In a way we owe Bush for the fact…

    No, Bush is simply the end player. It has taken the American public fully 25 years to finally see reality. The neocon movement was well under way by 1980 when Raygun was head puppet. 41 pushed it along beautifully although he does not get the “credit” he deserves. It should have stopped in 1992 except that Clinton let the criminals off the hook shutting down the on going investigations of the Iran/Contra affair.


  21. aarrgghh says:

    I didn’t think that we’d gone into Iraq to make a profit on this war.

    translation: ok, so the war’s turned into a money pit — so what? ok, so you lost the home and the retirement fund — so what? the important thing is i’ve still got mine. don’t be such a greedhead!


  22. questioneverything says:

    Turning into a money pit? That was their agenda from the start. Remember the scene in Fahrenheit 9/11 with the young corporatists at the conference dividing the spoils in advance? Where did Blackwater come from out of the blue? Can’t someone in congress have their staffs connect the dots? Do they know what a dot looks like? How much more evidence do you need? Stealing? From the American people and the next three generations of American people? Bitter, no. Just very, very angry. Impeach now.


  23. Xisithrus says:

    This must be why they accuse others of wanting to cut and run. Profits. [Snark]


  24. aarrgghh says:

    22. questioneverything Says:
    “Turning into a money pit? That was their agenda from the start.”

    i’m not disagreeing but i think their agenda from the start was to turn iraq into a “money tree”. a money tree is an investment that keeps on giving. a “money pit” is an investment that consumes more capital than it produces.

    money tree = good, mmmm
    money pit = bad, doh!


  25. vat694848 says:

    Will Kagen finally go away? I swear-to-God, this chicken hawk is everywhere, T.V., radio, and print. He’s selling a failed strategy and no-one is buying.


  26. ForTruth says:

    Some Democrats probably do profit from the war. Any of them with investments in defense contractors, like Diane Feinstein.


  27. ForTruth says:

    Kagan still has a blubbery chin anyway.


  28. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    One more time… Frank White is a troll.


  29. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    I’ve pointed out at least a half dozen times here now how Feinstein, thru her husband’s business dealings, has profited from this war .


  30. Doc Rock says:

    Iraq=3 reasons: 1) Dubya’s revenge on Saddam; 2) Cheney’s payback to Halliburton for his asbestos settlement: and Chevron, et al.’s desire for favorable (cheap) acces to Iraq’s oil. Repugnant greed for American blood and taxpayer’s gold.


  31. flavorino says:

    On what basis does this fat slob, mental case Kagan get so much publicity?
    Military historian? Bulls***, he’s just a weirdo that’s spent a lot a time alone reading books and fantasizing about armies and war.
    In the words of Teddy Roosevelt….I could carve a better man out of a banana.


  32. tombaker says:

    golly gee i’m a big fat wingnut welfare queen, and i hope the Boss is satisfied with my most recent pack of lies.


  33. Cal Malenky says:

    Well, golly gee, Paul Wolfowitz and other neocons said that the Iraq thing would pay for itself. That’s how they sold the war when the fear factor wasn’t working enough. But now Fred Kagan thinks it’s OK for the American people to spend a trillion dollars on Bush’s folly. Especially insulting on tax day.


  34. 1984 says:

    From wiki:
    “Frederick along with his brother Robert Kagan, who is a member of the Aspen Strategy Group, and their father Donald are all signatories to the Project for the New American Century manifesto titled Rebuilding America’s Defenses (2000).[2]”
    A guy tied to PNAC talks about profits from war…and in that document these people call out for a new Pearl Harbor. So Kagan, how did you celebrate the New Pearl Harbor?


  35. hussein toasterhead says:

    Frank White Says:

    In a way we owe Bush for the fact we are on the Cusp of a historic victory that will lead to a Progressive America.

    April 15th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
    _____

    Enough with this “cusp” stuff. This election ain’t a sure thing yet. It’s like that old adage: don’t count your chickens before they’ve nuked Iran.


  36. old_hack says:

    anyone who thinks there’s a difference bewteen democrats and republicans doesn’t have their head screwed on right. they’re all crooked bastards that want to rip off the public.


  37. Max-1 says:

    .

    Kagan projects as much as he makes me eject my lunch.

    .



  38. republicanSScareme says:

    Every time these neo-cons open their mouths they prove what idiots they are.


  39. Bullsmith says:

    Um, who’s the ex-CEO of Halliburton again? A Democrat?

    Republican projection knows no bounds.


  40. americangoy says:

    I just lost it.

    How can they lie so effortlessly?

    How can they distort reality 180 degrees?

    It is not the Democrats who sit on Bechtel, Halliburton boards and have stock in them…


  41. singe_101 says:

    If our government is profiting, then what would losing look like?

    He’s right, no blood for oil. No blood for $114 oil and Iraqis keeping it in reserve (putting out less than before the war) either.

    If they’re sovereign then let them be more responsible.


  42. GeeDubs says:

    They lie and lie and lie because they know the more they do it, the more people will believe it. There’s a cartoon that has Cheney sitting next to Plato and arguing, ‘But surely you must agree, the truth comes from the repetition of a lie.’


  43. Squeaky Wheels says:

    “I’ve pointed out at least a half dozen times here now how Feinstein, thru her husband’s business dealings, has profited from this war .”

    And so all Dems in and out of government are guilty by associaton and have no business criticizing the Bush admin’s war policy?



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll