Think Progress

Fratto Rewrites Bush Climate Policy, Claims President Called For Halting Carbon Emissions»

fratto.jpgYesterday, President Bush gave a speech on the environment in which he called for a “national goal” to halt the growth of U.S. carbon emissions by 2025. In other words, Bush would allow unchecked and unlimited growth in carbon emissions for the next 17 years, and only at that point would he have the “goal” to halt the rate of growth of those emissions.

Today, however, White House spokesman Tony Fratto rewrote Bush’s policy. In the press gaggle this morning, Fratto insisted that the media was ignoring “the major news” Bush made yesterday: a “goal to halt carbon emissions”:

I think some people have overlooked the major news that the President made yesterday, which was committing a national economy- wide goal to halt carbon emissions. That was a very important piece of the puzzle to lay out there as we move forward in the international arena and domestically in addressing this issue.

Of course, Bush proposed nothing close to a goal to “halt carbon emissions.” He announced merely a goal to halt the growth of emissions, explaining that emissions should “peak within 10 to 15 years, and decline thereafter.” For this reason, Bush’s proposal was ridiculed by the international community — and recognized as a catastrophic approach by leading climate scientists:

To keep temperatures from rising above 3.5 degrees, the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] said, industrialized countries would need to reduce emissions by 25 percent to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. The European Union has recommended doing that.

Bush’s goal would allow emissions to be 28 percent above 1990 levels in 2025, according to calculations made by the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, that are based on U.S. government projections data.

Considering that Bush’s proposal would do nothing to mitigate the disastrous effects of global warming, it’s no wonder Fratto instinctively sought to significantly strengthen the president’s goals.




Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

26 Responses to “Fratto Rewrites Bush Climate Policy, Claims President Called For Halting Carbon Emissions”

  1. RUCerious Says:

    The chymp never met an emission he wouldn’t suck up to.


  2. celtic cynic Says:

    Tony FratBoy: We’re gonna do nothing for the next 17 years, and then a miracle happens.

    WTF


  3. old_hack Says:

    Bush called for halting Emissions just like how he called for “intelligence” on Iraq…

    you guys seen all the people that compare Bush to Hitler. ever wonder why Hitler gets so much respect as far as militarism goes?

    me too…


  4. SWBob Says:

    Fratto must be submitted samples of his “historic” writings in hopes of snagging a job at the GWB “Library.”


  5. Marie Says:

    OT - I wonder if Fratto supplied the quip the boy-king offered to the pope after his address: “holiness, awesome speech.”
    What a turd - a walking turd is this Bush — and all who continue to work for him, stand by him and defend him.
    A comedian said we have a Will Farrell president.


  6. StratRat Says:

    Farto lives on the planet like the rest of us. Maybe he wants to have a healthy planet for his grandkids to enjoy? Nah.


  7. satirev Says:

    StratRat: I didn’t see your name for Fratto - I really didn’t until after I wrote about flatulence. Too funny!


  8. specialist f Says:

    Bush/co study concludes that Global Warming has nothing to do with carbon emmisions but instead the shrinking number of PIRATES!;) ARRRRG!
    http://www.venganza.org/piratesarecool4.gif


  9. www.regimeofterror.com Says:

    Is there anything Bush could do that you guys wouldn’t scream bloody murder about? Honestly.


  10. specialist f Says:

    11
    http://www.regimeofterror.com Says:
    Yes….RESIGN AND TAKE TRICKY DICK 2 WITH HIM!


  11. mary Says:

    good one specialist f! That works for me!

    maybe #11 will go back to his obsession with saddam hussein now.


  12. robbez_92107 Says:

    “I think some people have overlooked the major news that the President made last week, which was that he personally approved of the torture of U.S. detainees, which constitutes a war crime.”
    There - I fixed it for you, Tony.


  13. specialist f Says:

    Oh and I read some of the PROPAGANDA that you link to. Was good for a laugh. How about links to Saudi Arabia??? You know where 15 of the 9-11 hi-jackers came from? How many were from Iraq again?


  14. specialist f Says:

    Well Mary,I guess we could reanimate SH and try him for his terrorist links.Then hang him AGAIN!


  15. Namtillaku Says:

    As an humanistic atheist, I’ve pondered how a non-humanistic one would behave. Now I know, we can add Bush, Cheney, Fratto (of course I could go on and on) to the likes of Stalin, Hitler, etc.

    If there is no post-life consequence, then the object of life is to go out on ‘top’, no matter the cost. It’s the only thing I can come up with to explain the immorality of these.


  16. pbg Says:

    ROT:
    the no-call list was great.
    Firing Rumsfeld was also a good idea.


  17. specialist f Says:

    lessbrains=joey2times. You know it sucks you waste bandwidth with your first drivel filled post,but did you have to repeat it.


  18. Doc Rock Says:

    The Big Lie is alive and well in Cheney-Bush!


  19. Luis M Says:

    lessfree Says:
    Global Warming is the kind of irrational ideas that we want to keep out of our leadership.

    Where’s the irrationality? And who said anything about shutting down all coal based power plants?


  20. specialist f Says:

    Let me guess lessthanzero is the guy who dumps his used motor oil down the kitchen sink.


  21. blue state bob Says:

    Less than smart says: Articles like this really show TP’s true colors. Do you expect Bush to shut down all coal based power Plants? For a theory? Global Warming is the kind of irrational ideas that we want to keep out of our leadership. Happy 4/20!!!!!!!!!!

    Gravity is also a theory. Go jump off a bridge and prove that one isn’t true either. Please. Pretty please. Pretty please with sugar on top….


  22. Tired of being lied to Says:

    News flash for Fratto: No one can get too excited about a President who promises something (and very little at that) which requires him to do absolutely nothing. And 17 years from now? Good crap, we could have three different occupants of the White House by then.

    If Bush had bucked up and said he was going to HALT carbon emissions STARTING TODAY, and will have a plan to CUT them by NOVEMBER 2008 - now, people could get excited about that.


  23. Keith Says:

    They let it slip out. It was supposed to be a secret. Bush is going to be president for the next 17 years!!!


  24. Briseadh na Faire Says:

    What did I say about Bush wanting to enact a law now before he leaves office, and then the Republicans would block any changes?

    True to form…..


  25. Evil Spaniard Says:

    “Fratto Rewrites Bush Climate Policy, Claims President Called For Halting Carbon Emissions”

    In what world?


  26. specialist f Says:

    In what world?

    BIZZARO WORLD. Where up is down,
    black is white,
    torture is OK,
    the Constitution is optional,
    and shrub & dick are still not in prison!


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



Reports

imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll