Administration’s New Fuel Economy Rules Quietly Smack Down States’ Emissions Reduction Efforts
Administration’s New Fuel Economy Rules Quietly Smack Down States’ Emissions Reduction Efforts
Today, The New York Times reports that the administration has proposed raising “car and truck fuel economy standards substantially faster than required” by Congress. But what appears to be a positive development will sharply reduce states’ efforts to regulate greenhouse gases.
Tucked away in the 417-page report, as the San Francisco Chronicle notes, the Department of Transportation (DOT) declares that more stringent limits on emissions from states are an “obstacle to the accomplishment” of federal standards and conflicts with federal law:
(b) As a state regulation related to fuel economy standards, any state regulation regulating tailpipe
carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles is expressly preempted under 49 U.S.C. 32919.(c) A state regulation regulating tailpipe carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles, particularly a regulation that is not attribute-based and does not separately regulate passenger cars and light trucks, conflicts with:
1. The fuel economy standards in this Part
2. The judgments made by the agency in establishing those standards, and
3. The achievement of the objectives of the statute (49 U.S.C. Chapter 329)
But Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) won assurances that the energy legislation passed in December “would be neutral on whether California and other states could proceed with their own rules.” Pelosi reiterated yesterday that Congress has already decided to “reject the Administration’s position.”
The assault from the administration comes despite a federal judge in Vermont ruling in September that the state rules do not conflict with federal mileage standards, and a Fresno court in December saying California and the EPA can set limits on vehicle emissions. In the document, DOT said an appeal has been filed by carmakers, adding:
We respectfully disagree with the two district court rulings.
California lawmakers are outraged by the decision. State Attorney General Jerry Brown, for example, called it a “covert assault” on California’s greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Pelosi also condemned it as “completely unjustified.”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
“Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) won assurances…”
From whom with any credibilty in this administration?
And she’s braggin’ ’bout this?
She’s a Loser!!!
April 23rd, 2008 at 6:52 pmBut Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) won assurances that the energy legislation passed in December “would be neutral on whether California and other states could proceed with their own rules.”
And they’re surprised that this administration stabbed them in the back.
April 23rd, 2008 at 6:56 pmShit, they look like pincushions the amount of daggers and stilletos poking out of their backs.
Over the last 7+ years, one would think the congresscritters would simply stop accepting the words of the administration as anything but BS. Why on earth would they stand and be lied to over and over? Go to the steps of Congress and shout to the world all the lies that have been spoken by the administration. The American people will understand this. They are angry at Congress – almost more than bush – because the Congress stands there and gets pushed around. The American people WANT Congress to stop the administrations over-reach, but it will not. I have no idea why not.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:08 pmBottom line, our government and the people that run it are evil. I doubt they think of themselves that way, but with every single action on their part they are hurting people while enriching themselves.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:11 pmWhat the fu(k happened to “State’s Rights”? Oh. That’s right. The rights of the States are subservient to the profits of the energy industry.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:14 pmBush is trying a bit hard to flaunt the law this publicly in his last year. He’s acting more like a dictator trying to cement power than a “Lame Duck”.
Congress is sitting with their thumbs parked in their nether regions, mostly looking the other way.
None of the candidates are really addressing these issues.
Something stinks…… . . bad.
“Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t after you.”
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:20 pmpete Says:
What the fu(k happened to “State’s Rights”? Oh. That’s right. The rights of the States are subservient to the profits of the energy industry.
Republican “States Rights” has meant one thing since the 60s.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:26 pmRacism. The right to keep non whites separate.
It has never meant anything else to them.
Gee, I sorta thought that the Courts in this country were trump. Doesn’t the last word belong to the Courts of Law, final arbiter of what’s legal under our system of laws? Don’t we have, here, a Sec of Transportation expressly flouting official Judicial opinion? Aren’t there actual sanctions built for defying a judge? I’m pretty sure they would put MY ass in jail for that, why not his? You realize it’s not just presidential power that is greatly expanded and untouchable now, it’s also Executive Branch power. How can Pelosi be so stupid or complacent that she doesn’t realize that they’re taking all the power of the congressional branch right out from under her. I’m halfway convinced that by the time the next president get inaugurated there won’t actually be any government structure left to be president OF.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:28 pmWayne Says:
——————————————————————————–
Bush is trying a bit hard to flaunt the law this publicly in his last year. He’s acting more like a dictator trying to cement power than a “Lame Duck”.
Congress is sitting with their thumbs parked in their nether regions, mostly looking the other way.
None of the candidates are really addressing these issues.
Something stinks…… . . bad.
“Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t after you.”
It’s the RePugniScum, corporate facist takeover of America that you smell. Burning the Constitution!! It’s rancid!!!! And burns over the ashes of our once great Democracy!!
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:29 pmFeinstein & Pelosi know better than to be this naive and gullable. They have been in Congress too long not to know how the game is played. If it is not in writing; then you lose. Assurances mean nothing to this administration.
I see, Bush is working very hard on (not) reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Like anyone believes he takes Al Gore’s plan seriously. He obviously doesn’t care what shape the planet will be in for his children and future grandchild.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:36 pmThis insertion into the rules after agreeing the bill would remain neutral, remind me of signing statements…a disregard for the other branches of government by the administration and a disregard for the rights of states, as a favor to the auto-industry.
A capitulation to profits over reducing globlal warming.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:37 pmWhen will congress learn that assurances from the Bush crime family are meaningless?
This is a blatant attempt to appear as though they are vigorously installing emissions controls – which the obedient media will herald for them – while they squelch individual states in their efforts to be more stringent.
Bush is accustomed to signing statements — advocating one thing and doing another — this is par for the course for him.
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:41 pmMy calendar says 272 more days. That’s a long time yet.
Georgie sure knows how to pick ‘em…
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:50 pmsatirev Says:
“Whoa! For a minute, I thought Harriet Miers was back with the new blonde airhead being pawed by the Chimp on the photo.”
Hey Sat, it’s OK, she’s not wearing her blue dress today!
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:56 pmBut Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) won assurances that the energy legislation passed in December “would be neutral on whether California and other states could proceed with their own rules.”
From whom , exactly ?
This completely dishonest administration ?
Chimpy appointed judges and politicos ?
You’d have a better chance of playing Russian Roulette with 5 bullets and coming out of it alive ……………..
April 23rd, 2008 at 8:36 pmMopnsters wrapped in flags wearing their religions on their sleeves while they steal, ravage, and ignore in their blissful arrogance. The curtain can’t fall on their dumb show, too quickly.
April 23rd, 2008 at 8:36 pmSinclair Lewis said it long ago:
April 23rd, 2008 at 9:13 pm“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross” …
Listen up states, you’re gonna burn that oil, you’re gonna burn it all, you’re gonna make us rich and you’re f’ing do it with an f’ing smile!
April 23rd, 2008 at 9:36 pmI guess I better get a 2010 Chevrolet Camaro before the muscle car is legislated out of existence…
April 24th, 2008 at 12:35 amAll of Bush’s “environmental policy” decisions include the caveat that what we do must not hinder “economic growth.” I wonder what kind of growth we’ll have when peak oil and global warming hit us in full force.
http://progressiveworldreview.com
April 24th, 2008 at 11:14 amferrarimanf355 Says:
I guess I better get a 2010 Chevrolet Camaro before the muscle car is legislated out of existence…
April 24th, 2008 at 12:35 am Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
You mean substituteofaregularsizeddick cars?
April 24th, 2008 at 1:52 pmI’m just going to completely ignore that comment. I take it that you want to see all the cars off the road and everybody riding a bike to work. I don’t want that to happen. Uh, you are aware of my handle being ferrarimanf355, right?
April 28th, 2008 at 10:46 pm