Read somewhere 59 wolve’s have been shot since they were taken off the list a short while ago,,One snowmobieler chased a wolf 35 mile’s to gun it down….Those of us that care work long and hard to save live’s of people and wild life just to have some warmonging fool stop the live’s short….Look what we have bacome, a nation run by killer’s and fool’s….Blessing’s can’t stop madness.

Zimzone Says:
The solution to this dilemma is simple. The next time you incur a NeoConman, ask him to keep his mouth & ass closed.

Isn’t that redundant?

misshusseinmolly Says:

topgun Says
April 29th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Less polar bear’s mean less global warming. After we do away with polar bear farts we can move on to the next animal like Donkey’s!
_____________________________________________

I realize this was a snark post (at least, I HOPE you aren’t serious), but there are many who can’t see that protecting the polar bear is that big a deal.

You are giving topsnot way too much credit. Everything he knows about science he learned from Rush Limpbowel.

octamethyl Says:

Bush should be fed to a polar bear on Jan. 20 ‘09

Polar bears don’t eat shit.

I’m too choked up to talk about it right now…

Come back when you have a relevant and cogent argument to make. Otherwise, find something else to do when you tire of masturbating to internet porn.

The EPA refuses to regulate these creatures’ omissions, as does the Supreme Court.

One report stated that global warming has accelerated exponentially since our flatulent friends took office in 1994.

The solution to this dilemma is simple. The next time you incur a NeoConman, ask him to keep his mouth & ass closed. You’ll be safer, the Planet will benefit immensely and the overall noise level will be reduced dramatically.

In other words, GOPers should just STFU.

it is well past that time.
it it time to put somebody up against a fookin wall…

Why wait?

I realize this was a snark post (at least, I HOPE you aren’t serious), but there are many who can’t see that protecting the polar bear is that big a deal.

There’s a bit more to the story than that. The polar bear happens to be the top of the food chain for the entire arctic ecosystem — they feed on ringed seals, which feed on polar cod and other fish, which feed on plankton and krill, which feed on bacteria and provide balance to the oxygen and carbon dioxide in our oceans. Killing off one link in that chain can throw the whole chain out of whack with other species either dying off or becoming too abundant. And yes, what happens to a large ecosystem on one part of our planet can affect the rest of the planet through a domino effect.

However, this is pretty much lost on Bushco. And even if Bush and his merry men did understand the consequences of upsetting ecological balance, he probably wouldn’t be concerned, because after all, The Rapture is right around the corner (snark).

That wasn’t an argument, troll. It read like a cheap cartoon.

My apologies to cheap cartoons.

P.S.– Elbert Hubbard thinks you should shut your f ucking mouth.

April 29th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

What “argument” have you made or presented , jackass ?

All you’ve done is posted stupid petty shit that is neither relevant , intelligent or even applicable to the topic/thread……Get a clue.

Less polar bear’s mean less global warming. After we do away with polar bear farts we can move on to the next animal like Donkey’s!

April 29th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

See last sentence of post #6.