Think Progress

WSJ oversight committee informed of editor’s resignation ‘after the fact.’

Marcus Brauchli recently stepped down as the Wall Street Journal’s managing editor — just four months after Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. bought the newspaper. WSJ union members reportedly viewed Brauchli’s resignation as a “loss of ‘a buffer who would maintain editorial independence.’” Editor and Publisher reports that “[t]he special committee formed to oversee editorial independence” at the WSJ “claims it was improperly informed of [Brauchli's] resignation after the fact, according to a report the group released Tuesday”:

The report states that learning about the resignation “after the fact failed to meet the letter and the spirit of the agreement” between Dow Jones and News Corp. over editorial independence.

It went on to add, “Mr. Brauchli expressed ‘regret’ that the committee ‘learned of my resignation late in the process.‘” Brauchli resigned on April 22.



9 Responses to “WSJ oversight committee informed of editor’s resignation ‘after the fact.’”

  1. Zooey says:

    Imagine that…

    **eyes rolling**


  2. ralph the wonder llama says:

    I’m shocked — SHOCKED! to learn that Murdoch would violate “the letter and the spirit of the agreement”.

    Not even Condi Rice could have foreseen that.


  3. marlow says:

    WSJ is the corpse, dumped in Morlock’s vat of acid with a bull…t promise that nothing will change. It just takes a little time, that’s all.


  4. schrank says:

    My, my….how unlike Mr. Murdoch! WSJ Page 3 girls aren’t far away.


  5. cavjam says:

    The WSJ oversight committee : Rupert Murdoch
    :: Congress : Dick Cheney


  6. Bobwurst says:

    It’s not about the paper, it’s about the dishonesty milligram. No one expects you to get that. idiot.


  7. Bobwurst says:

    And quit waving your magic wand, the keyboard is sticky.


  8. Doc Rock says:

    Abandon all hope ye that worketh at the WSJ. Newsday is next! NYC will soon be under the Dark Prince of Journalism’s evil sway!


  9. barfly says:

    So a guy resigned from a paper none of you read but didn’t tell someone irrelevant.

    And this guy is always claiming that we make stuff up?

    I read the Journal, so I guess your assertion just got Cheneyed in the face.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll