Think Progress

Former CIA official indicted for accepting bribes of ’sexual companionship.’

Filed Under: Ethics

By Amanda on May 21st, 2008 at 2:31 pm

Former CIA official indicted for accepting bribes of ’sexual companionship.’»

AP reports that former #3 official at the CIA, Kyle “Dusty” Foggo, is facing a new indictment in the ethics scandal involving former congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham. The new indictment alleges that Foggo “received bribes in the form of ‘sexual companionship‘” in exchange for helping friend Brent Wilkes get multimillion-dollar contracts from the CIA. Allegations that Foggo received the “enrichment of a mistress,” however, were not “detailed in the indictment.”

Comments

23 Responses to “Former CIA official indicted for accepting bribes of ’sexual companionship.’”

Leftside Annie Says:

More Repuke “family values”!!
May 21st, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Max-1 Says:

.

I thought Foggo left his post to spend more time with his family…

.
May 21st, 2008 at 2:36 pm
DieNowForPeace Says:

Well, when you’re sick and tired of sucking your own dick, time to hire someone to do it for ya…
May 21st, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Badmoodman Says:

Former CIA official, Dusty Foggo, indicted for accepting bribes of ’sexual companionship.’

- -You couldn’t make up a porn name better than Dusty Foggo, unless you went for the VERY obvious.
May 21st, 2008 at 2:40 pm
JMOHR Says:

Once again we see the party of family values in action.
May 21st, 2008 at 2:40 pm
lokidog Says:

Hey Dusty, your jar of vaseline is in the mail - just a “house” warming gift you’ll be able to use in your new “home” with your butt buddy Ol’ Duke.

And the good news is you won’t have to pay anyone for some good ol’ GOP back door lovin’ there. It’s FREE!

BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
May 21st, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Tired Of Fighting Says:

What about Porter Goss?

Anyone remember him?

RIP
SGT Stephen R. Sherman
C CO 1-5 IN (STRYKER)
KIA 3 Feb 2005
Mosul, Iraq
May 21st, 2008 at 2:59 pm
StratRat Says:

The right side values something; but it sure isn’t the ‘family’. Every sunrise the repubs ruin their brand just a little bit more. Companionship? Is that what the right side calls a whore?
May 21st, 2008 at 3:18 pm
justme Says:

First of all, ewwww. Have any of you actually seen what Dusty looks like?

Second of all, ewwww.

Third of all, what, this is somehow surprising?

Fourth, while it’s nice, and all, that we’re slapping down the streetcorner crack dealers of Republican malfeasance, I am still waiting for a kingpin or three to get their comeuppances. Yeah, I know. Keep waiting. I suspect that I’ll see the heat death of the universe before that happens.
May 21st, 2008 at 3:20 pm
Shayne Says:

This story can’t be true as it implies there was heterosexual favors involved. That’s so NOT Republican.
May 21st, 2008 at 3:29 pm
CitiDC Says:

To this day, Porter Goss’ departure from the CIA was abrupt, stealth and unexplained.

We know he brought on a bunch of inexpeienced political appointees who wreaked havoc.

We know that he approved Foggo.

And we know he’s connected to voting fraudster Mark F. Thor Hearne, II in a financial transaction.

Just don’t know why.
May 21st, 2008 at 3:43 pm
DRxJ Says:

With a name like Dusy Foggo, you probably would have to accept bribes for sexual relations.
Lawd knows you wouldn’t be able to have them on your own.
Just saying….
May 21st, 2008 at 3:52 pm
mary Says:

This guy is just the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

If you’re feeling brave do a little research. The line of dots leads one to surprising places.
May 21st, 2008 at 3:57 pm
able as Says:

Hey, justme 9. On 27 May Vincent Bugliosi CA’s great prosecutor has a new book that demands GW be indicted for the murder of 4000+ American soldiers. This is the prosecutor who was able to get Chas. Manson, along with his family, indicted for the Sharon Tate, and LaBianca murders. I’m hoping something will come of this!
May 21st, 2008 at 4:00 pm
GeeDubs Says:

I really don’t want to connect those dots…as justme said…ewwwwwww.
May 21st, 2008 at 4:01 pm
RUCerious Says:

“Enrichment” of a mistress? That’s what they call getting skull from a prostitute? That’s rich.
May 21st, 2008 at 4:08 pm
mary Says:

GeeDubs - I must admit I’m a little surprised in you. The dots I referred to do not just lead to sexual impropriety. But, considering who indicted one used to work for, I do not blame you for being wary.
May 21st, 2008 at 4:36 pm
Freedom Rebel Says:

Just another day at the office; where officials getting indicted every other day. No wonder the government has been hiring so many people, under the Bush Administration. Who will be next that is the question?
May 21st, 2008 at 5:20 pm
Jackie Says:

The DOJ did as much as possible to save the sex scandal from this case. The DOJ even gave Smokin Gun per documents claiming Jean Palfrey the one who ran the Prostitution ring. The Media and the Public brought the lie hook, line and sinker. Even the Judges was fixed for the DOJ. Now looks like Jean’s case isn’t over yet. I can’t wait for the information about the tampered jury. All this to same Law Makers who used prostitutes. Now the one name that must be saved by any means necessary is running for the Oval Office. Yes Jean Palfrey had a Fantasy Sex Business that anyone can fine in the Yellow Pages as their are many to chose from. Yes she had a contract signed by her girls that said not sex is done in her business. Now you’ll see some young ladies worked for the Wilks/Foggo. Yes Jean was set up by both the Republican Judges/DOJ to save the Party. But the public didn’t know the difference from a Prostitution Business from a sex Fanstcy business. I guess it’s easier to believe what your told then to look it up and learn something. The Media compaired Jean’s business to the Emperor Sex Club with Spitzer paying 5,500 per hour. Jean’s none sex business was 275 dollars per hour. I guess some people think that they look alike, no wonder we’re in a recession it’s the math we don’t understand.
May 21st, 2008 at 6:53 pm
pbg Says:

Wasn’t Foggo the one with the hot tub that was never cleaned?
May 21st, 2008 at 6:57 pm
kassandrasduplex Says:

When is the media going to report on Diane Feinstein’s voting FAT WAR PROFITEER CONTRACTS for her husband…?
Could it be that because she is not a Gentile like Cummingham and Wilkes she gets special treatment?
May 21st, 2008 at 9:18 pm
kassandrasduplex Says:

Here’s the scoop on Feinstein. She and hubby made BILLIONS:
http://www.wnd.com/ news/ article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54932
May 21st, 2008 at 9:20 pm
Evil Spaniard Says:

In a hardly translatable words game, “Dust” means “sexual intercourse act” in Spanish slang. So “Dusty” had it coming…
May 22nd, 2008 at 8:31 am