Wasserman-Schultz on arresting Rove: ‘Well, if that’s what it takes.’
By on May 28th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Wasserman-Schultz on arresting Rove: ‘Well, if that’s what it takes.’
In an interview with MSNBC’s Dan Abrams yesterday, Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) said that the House Judiciary Committee would be willing to arrest Karl Rove if he continues to refuse to testify about his role in the U.S. attorney scandal and prosecution of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman. The Hill reports:
“Well, if that’s what it takes,” she said. “I mean we really cannot allow the co-equal branch of government, the legislative branch, to be trampled upon by the executive branch. The founding fathers established three branches of government. We are a co-equal branch, and this is an administration that essentially has ignored and disrespected the role of the legislative branch for far too long.”
Watch it:
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
So what in the hell are you all waiting for ?
May 28th, 2008 at 6:32 pmYou mean, it hasn’t worked so well thus far?
May 28th, 2008 at 6:35 pmRove will invoke the rights of unitary executive privilege and then…oh crap he’s not the President…hmmmm what now?
May 28th, 2008 at 6:37 pmThey should have been using inherent contempt long ago, and used it many times. These repukian criminals are going to walk without paying one second of prison time that they deserve.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:40 pm“..willing to arrest Karl Rove..”
The most harmonic words were ever spoken in American History; somebody put them to music.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:40 pmI’ll believe it when I see it. With McClellan’s book out, if the charges in that aren’t enough for impeachment than I don’t know what is.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:42 pmThank you, Representative Debbie for finally seeing the fact that this administration doesn’t believe you will hold tham accountable.
Well, right after the 4th of July Rove is suppose to make his appearance. It would be nice in a way if he doesn’t show. I think most of us would love to see him handcuff and humiliated being shoved into the back of a police car. That would definitely be cause to have a big party..
May 28th, 2008 at 6:44 pm“Well, if that’s what it takes.”
Let’s not kid anybody, that is what it will take.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:46 pmWow– Debbie actually does something I agree with, finally! If she backs up Wexler, then I’ll REALLY give ‘er some love.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:50 pmNow we’re starting to hear some sense.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:50 pmIf they need handcuffs, I’ll go out and buy some and mail it to them. Gees, do something… I’m waiting for the breaking news and the picture of traitor Rove in handcuffs. After what was revealed in Scotty’s book, I more convinced than ever that Karl Rove is a traitor to the Constitution of the United States and he betrayed our nation.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:50 pmWhy the long wait, Deb? The Executive Branch has been shitting on the Constitution for 8 years.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:51 pmAre you listening, John Conyers & Co over @ HJC? This had better not be just hot air.
Don’t forget, dear Democratic Reps, it’s an election year.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:52 pmDebbie does Karl~! Go girl, INHERENT contempt, as much as it takes to match the contempt that the executive branch and it’s current clown club have for your branch.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:52 pmDr. Zoidberg Says:
Wow– Debbie actually does something I agree with, finally! If she backs up Wexler, then I’ll REALLY give ‘er some love.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Um, where is Wexler on his big ole petition to impeach?
**crickets**
May 28th, 2008 at 6:53 pmAnyone hear Jonathan Turley on Randi Rhodes today? When asked why nothing has happened yet he said he thought the Dem leadership knew all along what was going on and won’t do anything to implicate themselves. Nothing will happen because they want to win. I think that if they try to do anything to this current administration, their house of cards will come tumbling down. I am just so disgusted by this all. If it turns out that Dem. leadership did have foreknowledge of some of the illegal activities (torture, wiretapping) they won’t move on ANYTHING.
May 28th, 2008 at 6:53 pmFR~!~
I think most of us would love to see him handcuff and humiliated being shoved into the back of a police car. That would definitely be cause to have a big party..
I’d second that with fireworks!!
May 28th, 2008 at 6:53 pmMemo to HJC: Time to stop flapping your gums and arrest McTreason Rove.
Release the hounds!
May 28th, 2008 at 6:54 pmI think that if they try to do anything to this current administration, their house of cards will come tumbling down. I am just so disgusted by this all. If it turns out that Dem. leadership did have foreknowledge of some of the illegal activities (torture, wiretapping) they won’t move on ANYTHING.
You make perfect sense. The Bush administration was only able to destroy the Constitution because the dems allowed it – at least after Novembers elections, and before. I fear it is the win at any cost philosophy which is driving our entire political process. The dems will let the thugs get away with the crimes because some of the dirt will fall onto their leadership for sitting on their hands for so long. I think it is time to completely start over with our political parties. We need more than just two or three parties competing for our votes.
May 28th, 2008 at 7:08 pm#17 RUCerious Says:
FR~!~
I think most of us would love to see him handcuff and humiliated being shoved into the back of a police car. That would definitely be cause to have a big party..
I’d second that with fireworks!!
The hits for the YouTube video would be in the millions. July can’t get here quick enough for me..
May 28th, 2008 at 7:08 pmDo we honestly believe that we will see an actual attempt to enforce the law? We have not seen it through two terms of the Bush presidency. The Republicans abdicated their responsibility by failing to make any attempt to reign is Bush. Something they could have done when in control of Congress. They could have done it to save the republic and to avoid embarrassment to their own party. But we did not see it.
We see the Democrats take charge in 2008 and still no substantive action to put an end to the antics of this White
May 28th, 2008 at 7:12 pmHouse. I doubt that we see it now.
#19 Stratrat
I was just talking about starting over with a good friend. Many years ago even politicians were considered “civil servants.” I think the whole concept of public service has gotten twisted and mangles by career politicians who will do anything to preserve their greed for power. I am really angry about all of this – I wish I knew where it is all going. Someone needs to step up and do the job they swore to do.
May 28th, 2008 at 7:14 pmWhat if the House Judiciary Committee places a couple strips of bacon where Rove is supposed to sit? Will that work?
Because, otherwise, we all know he’s going to evade arrest, hiding in Sean Hannity’s basement.
May 28th, 2008 at 7:16 pmUnbelievable that it has taken this long since the Alberto Gonzales testimonies for something to happen. His performance in his testimonies were a sure sign that something major was being completely covered up and that the administration were willing to sacrifice any staffers by ordering them to completely shut up when put under oath.
Also I hope the Siegelman case gets looked into at the same time. A man with a perfect track record gets jailed for corruption. The key witness had been interviewed and questioned more than 70 times by the prosecutors, who also had him “repeatedly write out his testimony, because they were frustrated with his recollection of events” (according to 60 Minutes). If that doesn’t make a couple of alarms go off, I don’t know what does.
May 28th, 2008 at 7:16 pm#6 tanglewood Says:
I’ll believe it when I see it. With McClellan’s book out, if the charges in that aren’t enough for impeachment than I don’t know what is.
It’s hearsay until someone from Congress asks him to go on the record. Let’s see what Congress does after reading the book.
But, I agree with you, we have yet to see them stand up to this administration at all. Most will pay for that by not being re-elected. I have Kucinich in Ohio so I personally can’t complain, he at least has tried.
May 28th, 2008 at 7:16 pmRove’s subpoena is for July 10.
Is it bad karma to wish for inherent contempt charges, and a video of Rove being led away in handcuffs that very evening?
May 28th, 2008 at 7:24 pmI meant to say, since July 10 is my birthday, is it bad karma to make that my wish?
May 28th, 2008 at 7:25 pm#22 And the beat goes on Says:
I was just talking about starting over with a good friend. Many years ago even politicians were considered “civil servants.” I think the whole concept of public service has gotten twisted and mangles by career politicians who will do anything to preserve their greed for power. I am really angry about all of this – I wish I knew where it is all going. Someone needs to step up and do the job they swore to do.
The problem is we need term limits, I think 12 years is perfectly reasonable. One term in the Senate and 3 in the House of Representatives, or two terms in the Senate. That would end career politicians from getting this powerful. I don’t think we would as many abuses that are currently happening. Plus, that would really hurt the Lobbyists. They are part of this nightmare; they get their hooks into members of Congress and we see them not looking out for the citizens they are suppose to be representing.
May 28th, 2008 at 7:28 pmI’ll kick in some karma to give you that happy birthday, Kestrel Bright Eyes!
May 28th, 2008 at 8:58 pmThe Constitution gives the Congress power in Article I, and the President power in Article II.
May 28th, 2008 at 9:46 pmSo, mr. utterly useless pile of protoplasm dinckledoofus booooosh, which one is more “basic?”
“I mean we really cannot allow the co-equal branch of government, the legislative branch, to be trampled upon by the executive branch. The founding fathers established three branches of government. We are a co-equal branch, and this is an administration that essentially has ignored and disrespected the role of the legislative branch for far too long.”
********************************************************
Oh, puh-leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze!! What Ms. Wasserman-Schultz has apparently utterly failed to recognize is that there’s a very simple explanation why Bush has been ignoring and dismissing Congress — because they’ve let him get away with it! It’s been my experience that if you show people you’re willing to be satisfied with dregs, that and no more is exactly what most of them will give you. As often as not, if you want other people to respect you in this life, you have to fight for it and refuse to accept anything less — which goes triple when dealing with a proven bully like Bush. The only way to earn a bully’s respect is to fight him — and unfortunately, even that doesn’t often work when dealing with the kind of utterly narcissistic bully who’s determined to win at literally any cost. For pity’s sake, what good does it do Congress to have teeth if they won’t use them?!?!? If they want Bush to give them the respect which is their due as an equal power in the government, then they should start acting like one instead of rolling over and playing dead whenever Bush snaps his fingers!
May 28th, 2008 at 10:27 pm.
If Rover has no bone to hide…
Then why is he so resistant to play catch with Congress?
Paul Rothstein argues that ONLY criminal activity in the Executive Office ISN’T protected by Executive privilege. However, how can one prove such criminality if witnesses are shielded from testifying about the truth? What remains but speculation of guilt – OR INNOCENCE. Why obstruct Justice if you are innocent – What is there to hide…
If there’s nothing to hide… ? ? ?
Back at ‘cha Carl.
.
May 29th, 2008 at 1:25 amWho would physically arrest Rove? Who would give the order? The Ag? The FBI? No one knows. Or “they” can always say “I thought you meant DON’T arrest Rove”. Better yet, “no one agency has juristiction”, kind of like being in 2 branches of goverment at the same time. The excuses can be endless. Back to the original question…Who would arrest Rove?
May 29th, 2008 at 2:53 amThis whole thing is like a “professional” wrestling match. The bad guy vs the good guy. After the Main Event they all go out and have a beer together.